Textron Inc. (TXT) — Q2 2026 Earnings Preview

Company

Textron Inc. (TXT)

Earnings Date

July 28, 2026 — Pre-Market (8:00 AM ET Call)

Reporting Period

Q2 2026 (quarter ending June 30, 2026)

Prepared

July 27, 2026

Sector ETF Benchmark

XLI (Industrial Select Sector SPDR)

1. Earnings Preview

Key Takeaway: The setup favors a beat on EPS and Aviation deliveries, but the single biggest swing factor is whether Bell’s commercial volume recovery materializes as guided and whether the Army has secured supplemental GFY26 funding for the MV-75 Cheyenne program.

Heading into Q2 2026, the bar for Textron is achievable but not low: consensus sits at roughly $1.55 adjusted EPS and $3.81 billion in revenue, both representing meaningful year-over-year growth off a solid Q2 2025 base. Management’s posture on the Q1 call was constructive but measured — they explicitly guided for sequential improvement in Aviation deliveries and margins each quarter, with the margin peak in Q4, and flagged that Bell commercial volume would normalize throughout the year in a pattern similar to prior years. Estimate revisions have drifted modestly lower since the Q1 print (consensus EPS for Q2 2026 has slipped from ~$1.54 at the post-Q1 baseline to ~$1.55 currently, essentially flat), suggesting the Street has largely digested the guidance and is not pricing in a meaningful beat or miss. The stock has underperformed XLI since the April 30 earnings date — TXT is roughly flat to slightly higher while XLI has rallied — meaning the stock has not pre-run a beat, and the multiple at ~16x NTM P/E remains at a discount to pure-play defense peers, reflecting lingering execution risk around the MV-75 LRIP transition and Aviation margin recovery. The key wildcard is the MV-75 GFY26 supplemental funding: management said on the Q1 call that the Army was “actively pursuing additional funding,” and any confirmation of those funds — or absence thereof — will be the dominant narrative on the July 28 call, with the potential to move Bell’s revenue and the stock meaningfully in either direction.

2. KPIs & Consensus Expectations

Key Takeaway: Consensus is a moderate bar — achievable if Aviation deliveries step up sequentially as guided and Bell commercial volume normalizes. Aviation segment margin is the bigger swing factor; Bell revenue is the wildcard tied to MV-75 funding.

Table 1 — Q2 2026 Current Quarter Snapshot

KPI

Q1 2026 Actual

Q2 2025 Actual (Prior Year)

Q2 2026 Consensus Estimate

YoY Change

FY 2026 Guidance (Mgmt)

Consensus vs. Guidance

Adjusted EPS (Diluted)

$1.45

$1.55

$1.55

0.0%

$6.40–$6.60

~−1% vs. midpoint ($6.50)

Total Revenue

$3,695M

$3,716M

$3,813M

+2.6%

N/A — no explicit quarterly guide

N/A

Textron Aviation Revenue

$1,485M

$1,522M

$1,585M

+4.1%

FY ~$6.50B (implied)

~−0.3% vs. FY midpoint run-rate

Textron Aviation Segment Profit

$154M (10.4% margin)

$170M (11.2% margin)

$180M (~11.4% margin)

+5.9%

Sequential improvement each quarter; peak Q4

Tracking guidance trajectory

Bell Revenue

$1,070M

$1,016M

$1,040M

+2.4%

FY ~$4.44B (consensus)

N/A — no explicit quarterly guide

Bell Segment Profit

$72M (6.7% margin)

$80M (7.9% margin)

$82M (~7.9% margin)

+2.5%

FY 8%–9% margin

Tracking low end of guide

Total Backlog

$19,162M

$16,923M

$19,193M

+13.4%

N/A

N/A

Manufacturing Free Cash Flow

–$240M (seasonal use)

$317M

$162M

−48.9%

FY $700M–$800M

FY consensus $670M vs. $750M midpoint (−11%)

Source: Visible Alpha consensus and actuals data. All figures in USD millions unless noted. Adjusted EPS excludes LIFO inventory provision and intangible amortization per Textron’s non-GAAP definition. Q2 2026 consensus as of July 27, 2026.

Table 2 — Beat / Miss History (Last 8 Quarters, Top 2 KPIs)

Top 2 KPIs: Adjusted EPS (Diluted) and Textron Aviation Revenue

Quarter

KPI

Reported

Consensus Est.

Surprise %

Result

Q1 2026

Adj. EPS

$1.45

$1.30

+11.5%

Beat

Q1 2026

Aviation Revenue

$1,485M

$1,357M

+9.4%

Beat

Q4 2025

Adj. EPS

$1.73

$1.71

+1.2%

Beat

Q4 2025

Aviation Revenue

$1,754M

$1,737M

+1.0%

Beat

Q3 2025

Adj. EPS

$1.55

$1.44

+7.6%

Beat

Q3 2025

Aviation Revenue

$1,479M

$1,545M

−4.3%

Miss

Q2 2025

Adj. EPS

$1.55

$1.44

+7.6%

Beat

Q2 2025

Aviation Revenue

$1,522M

$1,522M

0.0%

In-Line

Q1 2025

Adj. EPS

$1.28

$1.13

+13.3%

Beat

Q1 2025

Aviation Revenue

$1,216M

$1,243M

−2.2%

Miss

Q4 2024

Adj. EPS

$1.34

$1.37

−2.2%

Miss

Q4 2024

Aviation Revenue

$1,282M

$1,525M

−15.9%

Miss

Q3 2024

Adj. EPS

$1.40

$1.49

−6.0%

Miss

Q3 2024

Aviation Revenue

$1,339M

$1,418M

−5.6%

Miss

Source: Visible Alpha consensus and actuals data. Pattern: TXT has beaten adjusted EPS in 5 of the last 8 quarters, but Aviation revenue has been a persistent source of misses — missing in 4 of the last 8 quarters, often by wide margins. The Q1 2026 beat on both metrics was the cleanest print in several quarters and sets a higher bar for Q2.

3. Guidance & Commentary Evolution

Key Takeaway: Guidance is unchanged since the April 30 Q1 2026 earnings call — no post-earnings 8-K, conference, or investor day has revised the numbers. Management tone was constructive but cautious, flagging the MV-75 GFY26 funding gap as a near-term risk while expressing confidence in the Army’s ability to secure supplemental appropriations.

Metric

Initial Guidance (Q1 2026 Earnings Call, Apr 30)

Revised Guidance

Current Consensus

Note

FY 2026 Adjusted EPS

$6.40–$6.60

$6.48

Unchanged; consensus near midpoint

FY 2026 GAAP EPS

$5.39–$5.59

N/A

Unchanged

FY 2026 Mfg. Cash Flow (before pension)

$700M–$800M

$670M

Unchanged; consensus ~11% below midpoint — Street more cautious on cash conversion

FY 2026 CapEx

$650M

N/A

Unchanged

Aviation Deliveries Cadence

Sequential increase each quarter; ~200 total jets for year; margin peak Q4

N/A

Unchanged; management reallocating R&D into supply chain/factory to drive throughput

Bell FY 2026 Margin

8%–9% for full year; commercial volume to normalize with Q4 peak

~7.8% implied by consensus

Unchanged; consensus tracking low end of guide

MV-75 FY 2026 Revenue

Roughly flat year-over-year; Army pursuing supplemental GFY26 funding

N/A

Near-term funding gap flagged; FYDP calls for $2.3B in FY27 scaling to $3.8B in FY31

MV-75 LRIP Catch-Up Charge

$60M–$110M; timing depends on LRIP CLIN exercise — could be H2 2026 or H1 2027

N/A

Unchanged; timing uncertainty remains a key risk

Industrial Segment Separation

Targeting completion within 12–18 months; sale or tax-free spin-off

N/A

No update since April 30 announcement; process ongoing

4. Guidance vs. Estimate Revision Tracker

Key Takeaway: Estimates for Q2 2026 and FY 2026 have been essentially stable since the Q1 print — a slight drift lower on EPS but no meaningful revision in either direction. The Street is tracking guidance closely, with the primary gap being on manufacturing cash flow where consensus sits ~11% below the guidance midpoint, suggesting the market is more cautious on cash conversion than management.

KPI (Period)

Estimate ~5 Days Post Q1 Earnings (May 7, 2026)

Current Consensus (Jul 27, 2026)

Estimate Δ (%)

Initial Guidance (Q1 Call)

Current Guidance

Guidance Δ

Consensus vs. Guidance (%)

Adj. EPS — Q2 2026

$1.54

$1.55

+0.6%

No quarterly guide

No quarterly guide

N/A

N/A

Adj. EPS — FY 2026

$6.48

$6.48

0.0%

$6.40–$6.60

$6.40–$6.60

Unchanged

−0.3% vs. midpoint

Total Revenue — Q2 2026

$3,803M

$3,813M

+0.3%

No quarterly guide

No quarterly guide

N/A

N/A

Total Revenue — FY 2026

$15,587M

$15,603M

+0.1%

No explicit FY guide

No explicit FY guide

N/A

N/A

Aviation Revenue — Q2 2026

$1,570M

$1,585M

+1.0%

No quarterly guide

No quarterly guide

N/A

N/A

Aviation Revenue — FY 2026

$6,478M

$6,497M

+0.3%

~$6.5B implied (~200 jets)

Unchanged

Unchanged

~−0.1% vs. implied guide

Bell Revenue — Q2 2026

$1,042M

$1,040M

−0.2%

No quarterly guide

No quarterly guide

N/A

N/A

Bell Revenue — FY 2026

$4,440M

$4,441M

0.0%

MV-75 flat YoY; commercial normalizing

Unchanged

Unchanged

Tracking guidance

Mfg. FCF — FY 2026

$664M

$670M

+0.9%

$700M–$800M

Unchanged

Unchanged

−11% vs. midpoint — Street more cautious

Source: Visible Alpha consensus and actuals data. Post-Q1 baseline uses consensus as of May 7, 2026 (5 trading days after April 30 earnings). The revision picture is remarkably stable — estimates have barely moved since the Q1 print, suggesting the Street has high conviction in the guidance framework but is not yet willing to model above the midpoint on cash flow, where MV-75 CapEx and LRIP timing uncertainty create downside risk.

5. Stock Performance

Key Takeaway: TXT has lagged XLI since the Q1 earnings date despite a strong beat-and-raise print, suggesting the market is discounting the Industrial separation optionality and MV-75 execution risk rather than rewarding the Q1 beat. The recent 1-month rally (+8%) is multiple-driven (EV/EBITDA expanded ~9%), not estimate-driven, indicating sentiment improvement rather than fundamental revision.

Chart: TXT vs. XLI vs. S&P 500 — Indexed to 100 at April 30, 2026 (Last Earnings Date)

Date

TXT (Indexed)

XLI (Indexed)

SPY (Indexed)

Apr 30, 2026 (Base)

100.0

100.0

100.0

May 15, 2026

92.5

98.2

102.9

Jun 1, 2026

93.4

98.8

105.6

Jun 22, 2026

90.6

104.1

103.6

Jun 30, 2026

95.6

106.1

103.9

Jul 16, 2026

94.5

103.2

104.5

Jul 24, 2026

99.6

104.6

102.8

Jul 28, 2026 (Pre-Earnings)

100.2

104.9

102.8

Source: Yahoo Finance / Stock Price Data. Base = April 30, 2026 closing prices (TXT: $95.96, XLI: $174.58, SPY: $718.66). Current prices as of July 28, 2026 pre-market (TXT: $96.13, XLI: $183.20, SPY: $739.09).

Performance Summary (Apr 30 → Jul 28, 2026): TXT +0.2% | XLI +4.9% | SPY +2.8%. TXT has meaningfully underperformed XLI since the Q1 earnings date, despite the strong beat-and-raise print. The stock dipped to a low of ~$86 in late June (roughly −10% from the earnings date) before recovering sharply in July as defense peers (LMT, RTX, NOC) reported strong Q2 results and raised guidance, lifting sentiment across the A&D sector. The 1-month performance of +8% is almost entirely multiple expansion (EV/EBITDA expanded ~9% per the stock performance decomposition data), not estimate revision, suggesting the recovery is sentiment-driven and could be fragile if Q2 results disappoint.

Key Events Since Apr 30: (1) Apr 30 — Q1 2026 beat + Industrial separation announcement (stock surged pre-market). (2) May 1 — Annual shareholder meeting (directors, auditors, executive pay approved). (3) Jul 1 — TXT announced Q2 results release date of July 28, 2026. (4) Jul 13–23 — Defense peer earnings season (LMT, RTX, NOC all beat and raised guidance), lifting A&D sector sentiment and pulling TXT higher into its own print.

6. Material News & Developments

Key Takeaway: The most important development since Q1 earnings is the wave of defense peer beats-and-raises (LMT, RTX, NOC) confirming robust defense demand, strong backlogs, and improving supply chains — all positive read-throughs for TXT’s Bell and Systems segments heading into Q2. The Industrial separation process is ongoing with no update, and the MV-75 GFY26 funding gap remains the primary company-specific risk.

7. Peer Commentaries / Read-Throughs (Last 60 Days)

Key Takeaway: Defense peers reporting Q2 2026 results in the last two weeks have universally beaten and raised guidance, confirming robust defense demand, record backlogs, and improving supply chains. Commercial aerospace peers (GE Aerospace, Honeywell Aerospace) confirm resilient aftermarket demand and improving supplier delivery. These are strong forward-looking read-throughs for TXT’s Bell, Systems, and Aviation segments heading into Q2.

Note: Only forward-looking commentary about Q2 2026 or beyond, or commentary made after peers’ own Q2 2026 earnings reports, is included below. Stale commentary about prior-quarter conditions has been excluded.

Lockheed Martin (LMT) — Q2 2026 Earnings Call, July 23, 2026

Relevance to TXT: Bell (helicopter competition / defense demand), Textron Systems (defense electronics, munitions backdrop)

RTX Corporation — Q2 2026 Earnings Call, July 23, 2026

Relevance to TXT: Bell (defense helicopter demand), Textron Aviation (commercial aerospace aftermarket), Textron Systems (defense electronics)

Northrop Grumman (NOC) — Q2 2026 Earnings Call, July 21, 2026

Relevance to TXT: Textron Systems (Sentinel Tier 1 supplier), Bell (defense budget / Army spending)

GE Aerospace — Q2 2026 Earnings Call, July 16, 2026

Relevance to TXT: Textron Aviation (commercial aerospace supply chain, aftermarket demand, business jet market backdrop)

Honeywell Aerospace — Commentary, July 20–23, 2026

Relevance to TXT: Textron Aviation (avionics, aftermarket), Bell (defense helicopter systems)

8. Insider Transaction Activity

Key Takeaway: One notable open-market buy by a director (Thomas Kennedy, ~$1M) shortly after the Q1 earnings print is a modestly positive signal. The single open-market sale by director Kerry Clark is small and appears routine. No clustered selling or unusual activity — insider activity is not a meaningful signal in either direction heading into Q2.

Name

Title

Transaction Type

Value (Approx.)

Date

Note

Thomas A. Kennedy

Director

Open Market Buy

~$1.0M (10,300 shares @ ~$97)

May 1, 2026

Discretionary purchase; day after Q1 earnings beat. Constructive signal — director buying at post-earnings price.

R. Kerry Clark

Director

Open Market Sale

~$240K (2,517 shares @ ~$95)

May 6, 2026

Discretionary sale; small relative to holdings (8,611 shares remaining). Routine in size; not flagged as 10b5-1 plan.

Source: SEC Form 4 filings. Only open-market buys (code P) and open-market sells (code S) are included. No 10b5-1 plan initiations were identified for TXT in the period. No executive-level (CEO, CFO, COO) transactions were filed in the window since the Q1 earnings date.

The director buy by Thomas Kennedy (former Raytheon CEO) on May 1 — the day after the Q1 beat and Industrial separation announcement — is the most notable transaction. Purchasing ~$1M of stock at the post-earnings price suggests conviction in the strategic direction and valuation. The Clark sale is small and does not appear to be part of a pre-planned program. No executive-level selling was disclosed, which is a neutral-to-positive signal heading into Q2.

Appendix: Key Valuation Context

Metric

Current (NTM)

3 Months Ago

12 Months Ago

Commentary

EV / EBITDA

10.35x

9.81x

10.49x

+5.5% multiple expansion over 3M; discount to pure-play defense peers

P / E (NTM)

15.99x

15.55x

15.08x

Modest re-rating over 12M; still at discount to A&D peers

P / FCF (NTM)

20.91x

20.28x

17.58x

+19% expansion over 12M; reflects elevated MV-75 CapEx in near-term FCF

EV / Sales

1.16x

1.10x

1.19x

Low absolute multiple; reflects conglomerate discount pre-Industrial separation

1-Month Price Change

+7.96%

Almost entirely multiple expansion; not estimate-driven

12-Month Price Change

+18.81%

Driven by mix of multiple expansion and earnings growth

Source: Stock performance decomposition data (NTM multiples as of July 27, 2026). Primary valuation metric for TXT is EV/EBITDA given the multi-segment industrial/A&D structure. Post-Industrial separation, the company would likely re-rate toward pure-play A&D peers at 12–14x EV/EBITDA, representing meaningful upside from the current 10.35x.

Disclosures: All consensus and actuals data sourced from Visible Alpha. Stock price data sourced from Yahoo Finance. Insider transaction data sourced from SEC Form 4 filings. Peer commentary sourced from earnings call transcripts and press releases filed with the SEC. This document is prepared for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Prepared July 27, 2026.