Company | Ball Corporation |
Ticker | BALL (NYSE) |
Reporting Period | Q2 2026 (quarter ended June 30, 2026) |
Earnings Date | August 4, 2026 |
Prepared | August 3, 2026 |
Last Earnings | May 5, 2026 (Q1 2026) |
Sector ETF Benchmark | XLB (Materials Select Sector SPDR) |
Key Takeaway: The setup into Q2 2026 is constructive — management guided explicitly to mid-single-digit enterprise volume growth (the tenth consecutive quarter of growth) and confirmed South America's sharp April/May recovery, making the bar achievable; the biggest swing factor is whether $35M of Millersburg/NS domestication start-up costs land as guided or surprise to the upside in Q2 vs. Q3.
Ball enters Q2 2026 with a well-telegraphed setup: management guided to mid-single-digit enterprise volume growth at the Wells Fargo Industrials Conference (June 10), which would mark the tenth consecutive quarter of volume expansion, and consensus EPS of $0.97 sits modestly above the prior-year Q2 actual of $0.90 — a reasonable bar given the strong operating leverage trajectory. Guidance tone has been consistently confident since the Q1 beat, with the CEO reaffirming the 10%-plus comparable diluted EPS growth algorithm for full-year 2026 and accelerating the $500M productivity program delivery to year-end 2026, a year ahead of schedule. Estimate revisions have been stable-to-slightly-positive since the Q1 print, with Q2 EPS consensus edging up from $0.958 to $0.971 — tracking guidance rather than diverging, which limits both upside surprise and downside risk. The stock has outperformed meaningfully since last earnings (+14.1% vs. XLB -1.0% and SPY +4.7%), suggesting the market has already priced in solid execution, compressing the reward for an in-line beat. The key wildcard is the timing and magnitude of Millersburg start-up and NS ends domestication costs ($35M guided for Q2-Q3, heavily weighted to Q3) — if more of these costs land in Q2 than expected, operating leverage in North America could disappoint even against a modest volume backdrop.
Key Takeaway: Consensus sets a moderate bar — Q2 EPS of $0.97 implies ~8% YoY growth, below the full-year 10%+ algorithm, leaving room for upside if operating leverage again exceeds the 2x target. Revenue is the bigger swing factor given the pass-through of higher aluminum costs (CCK's Americas beverage revenue rose 21% in Q2 on aluminum pass-through alone), while EPS will hinge on whether start-up costs are front- or back-half weighted.
KPI | Q1 2026 Actual | Q2 2025 Actual (Prior Year) | Q2 2026 Consensus Estimate | YoY Change | Guidance | Consensus vs. Guidance |
Revenue ($B) | $3.603B | $3.338B | $3.642B | +9.1% | No specific Q2 revenue guidance provided | N/A |
Adj. EPS (Diluted - Operating) | $0.94 | $0.90 | $0.971 | +7.9% | 10%+ full-year EPS growth algorithm | ~In line (implies ~8% YoY, slightly below 10%+ FY target) |
Operating EBITDA ($M) | $509M | $519M | $536M | +3.3% | 2x operating leverage on volume growth | N/A (no explicit EBITDA guidance) |
Operating Income ($M) | $387M | $402M | $406M | +1.0% | 2x operating leverage on volume growth | N/A |
Free Cash Flow ($M) | -$938M (seasonal) | $236M | $621M | +163% | >$900M full-year FCF | N/A (quarterly FCF not guided) |
Revenue - N. America ($B) | $1.776B | $1.613B | $1.735B | +7.6% | 1-3% vol. growth (low end); capacity constrained | N/A |
Revenue - EMEA ($B) | $1.111B | $1.123B | $1.236B | +10.1% | Above top end of 3-5% range (Benepack); 2x op. leverage | N/A |
Revenue - S. America ($B) | $0.585B | $0.477B | $0.547B | +14.7% | Low-double to teens growth (CEO guided at Wells Fargo conf.) | ~In line / slightly below midpoint |
Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data. All consensus figures as of August 3, 2026. Q1 2026 actuals are the most recently reported figures. Q2 2025 actuals represent the prior-year comparable period.
Quarter | Reported | Consensus | Surprise % | Result |
Q2 2024 | $0.74 | $0.687 | +7.7% | Beat |
Q3 2024 | $0.91 | $0.848 | +7.3% | Beat |
Q4 2024 | $0.84 | $0.782 | +7.4% | Beat |
Q1 2025 | $0.768 | $0.686 | +12.0% | Beat |
Q2 2025 | $0.90 | $0.864 | +4.2% | Beat |
Q3 2025 | $1.026 | $1.012 | +1.4% | Beat |
Q4 2025 | $0.91 | $0.891 | +2.1% | Beat |
Q1 2026 | $0.94 | $0.830 | +13.3% | Beat |
Quarter | Reported ($B) | Consensus ($B) | Surprise % | Result |
Q2 2024 | $2.959B | $3.112B | -4.9% | Miss |
Q3 2024 | $3.082B | $3.166B | -2.6% | Miss |
Q4 2024 | $2.880B | $2.935B | -1.9% | Miss |
Q1 2025 | $3.097B | $2.904B | +6.6% | Beat |
Q2 2025 | $3.338B | $3.119B | +7.0% | Beat |
Q3 2025 | $3.379B | $3.336B | +1.3% | Beat |
Q4 2025 | $3.347B | $3.142B | +6.5% | Beat |
Q1 2026 | $3.603B | $3.332B | +8.1% | Beat |
Pattern: BALL has beaten adj. EPS consensus in each of the last 8 quarters, with beat magnitude ranging from +1.4% to +13.3% — a remarkably consistent track record. Revenue beat/miss is more mixed: three consecutive misses in Q2-Q4 2024 (when aluminum pass-through was lower and volumes were soft) gave way to five consecutive beats from Q1 2025 onward as volumes accelerated and aluminum cost pass-through inflated the top line. Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data.
Key Takeaway: Guidance has been unchanged since the Q1 2026 earnings call — management reaffirmed all key metrics at the Wells Fargo conference (June 10) with no revisions. Tone remains confidently on-track, with the CEO explicitly stating the company is “right on track” for all January 2026 commitments.
Metric | Initial Guidance (Q1 2026 Earnings, May 5, 2026) | Revised Guidance | Current Consensus | Note |
Full-Year Adj. EPS Growth | 10%+ comparable diluted EPS growth | — | $3.967 (+10.5% vs. FY2025 $3.59 implied) | Reaffirmed at Wells Fargo conf. June 10; tone unchanged and confident |
Full-Year Free Cash Flow | >$900M | — | $937M | Reaffirmed at Wells Fargo conf. June 10; described as “record year on top of record year” |
Shareholder Returns (FY2026) | ~$800M total; ≥$600M buybacks | — | N/A (not tracked by VA) | Unchanged; on track per Q1 call |
Year-End Net Debt / EBITDA | ~2.7x (path to 2.5x) | — | N/A | Reaffirmed at Wells Fargo conf. June 10; from 2.8x at end of 2025 |
Enterprise Volume Growth (FY2026) | Towards top end of 2-3% range | — | N/A (not a VA-tracked KPI) | Reaffirmed at Wells Fargo conf.; Q2 specifically guided to mid-single-digit growth |
N. America Volume Growth (FY2026) | Low end of 1-3% range (capacity constrained) | — | N/A | Unchanged; “right on track” per Wells Fargo conf. |
EMEA Volume Growth (FY2026) | Above top end of 3-5% range (Benepack); 2x op. leverage | — | N/A | Unchanged; “high end of range” per Wells Fargo conf. |
S. America Volume Growth (FY2026) | Low end of 4-6% range; 2x op. leverage | — | N/A | ↑ Upgraded at Wells Fargo conf. to “low double, maybe teens” for Q2 and full year; April +20%, May equally strong |
Start-up / Domestication Costs (FY2026) | $35M (Millersburg + NS ends); Q2-Q3 weighted, heavily Q3 | — | N/A | Unchanged; key watch item for Q2 vs. Q3 timing split |
$500M Productivity Program | Delivered by end of 2026 (1 year early) | — | N/A | Reaffirmed at Wells Fargo conf.; framed as “one waypoint” with ongoing annual productivity thereafter |
Key Takeaway: Estimates have moved modestly higher since the Q1 2026 print — Q2 EPS consensus is up ~1.3% and FY2026 EPS up ~0.4% from the post-earnings baseline — tracking guidance rather than diverging. The gap between consensus and the 10%+ EPS growth algorithm is narrow, suggesting the street is giving management credit for execution without pricing in meaningful upside.
KPI (Period) | Estimate ~5 Days Post Q1 Earnings (as of 5/12/26) | Current Consensus | Estimate Δ (%) | Initial Guidance (Q1 Call) | Current Guidance | Guidance Δ | Consensus vs. Guidance (%) |
Adj. EPS — Q2 2026 | $0.958 | $0.971 | +1.3% | 10%+ FY EPS growth algorithm (no specific Q2 EPS guidance) | Unchanged | — | ~In line (implies ~8% YoY) |
Revenue — Q2 2026 | $3.644B | $3.642B | -0.1% | No specific Q2 revenue guidance | Unchanged | — | N/A |
Operating EBITDA — Q2 2026 | $532M | $536M | +0.7% | 2x operating leverage on volume growth | Unchanged | — | N/A |
Adj. EPS — FY2026 | $3.953 | $3.967 | +0.4% | 10%+ comparable diluted EPS growth | Unchanged (reaffirmed June 10) | — | ~In line with 10%+ algorithm |
Revenue — FY2026 | $14.434B | $14.420B | -0.1% | No specific FY revenue guidance | Unchanged | — | N/A |
FCF — FY2026 | $958M | $937M | -2.2% | >$900M | Unchanged (reaffirmed June 10) | — | Consensus above guidance floor (+4.1% vs. $900M) |
Estimates have drifted only marginally since the Q1 print, with Q2 EPS up ~$0.013 and FY EPS up ~$0.014 — the street is essentially holding its position rather than chasing guidance higher. FCF consensus has edged down slightly but remains comfortably above the >$900M guidance floor. The lack of meaningful upward revision despite a strong Q1 beat and confident management tone suggests the market is waiting for Q2 execution to confirm the trajectory before re-rating estimates. Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data.
Key Takeaway: BALL has outperformed sharply since the Q1 beat (+14.1% vs. XLB -1.0% and SPY +4.7%), driven by a combination of estimate revisions and multiple re-rating as investors gained confidence in the profit-per-can improvement story. The stock’s outperformance relative to both the sector and the market suggests sentiment has shifted from skeptical to constructive, raising the bar for a positive reaction on Q2.
BALL vs. XLB vs. S&P 500 — Indexed to 100 at Q1 2026 Earnings (May 5, 2026). Source: Yahoo Finance / Stock Price Data.
BALL closed at $65.15 on August 4, 2026 (earnings day), up from $57.11 at the Q1 2026 earnings close on May 5, 2026 — a gain of +14.1% over the inter-earnings period. The XLB Materials ETF declined -1.0% over the same period, and the S&P 500 (SPY) gained +4.7%, making BALL’s outperformance approximately +15pp vs. XLB and +9pp vs. the market. The stock’s rally was not linear: BALL drifted lower through mid-June (touching ~$52.62 on June 8) before reversing sharply from June 23 onward, coinciding with improving macro sentiment and the Wells Fargo conference reaffirmation. The late-June/July rally of ~+20% from the June trough reflects both the constructive guidance update and broader sector rotation into materials. Source: Yahoo Finance / Stock Price Data.
Key Takeaway: Peer Q2 2026 earnings calls provide a broadly constructive read-through for BALL — Crown Holdings (CCK) reported 5% global beverage can volume growth and raised full-year guidance, while Alcoa (AA) confirmed resilient aluminum demand and packaging as the strongest end market. The one cautionary note is CCK’s Brazil softness (volumes down 10% in Latin America in Q2), which partially conflicts with BALL management’s bullish South America commentary.
Relevance: CCK is BALL’s closest direct peer in global beverage cans. CCK’s Q2 results are the single most important read-through for BALL’s volume and pricing environment.
Relevance: AA is BALL’s primary aluminum supplier read-through. AA’s commentary on aluminum demand, pricing, and supply dynamics directly informs BALL’s input cost environment and pass-through model.
Relevance: SLGN is a packaging peer with metal container and dispensing/closure exposure. Less directly comparable to BALL’s beverage can business, but provides read-through on consumer demand, Brazil, and packaging cost dynamics.
Relevance: Pre-quarter commentary from AA management on aluminum market conditions heading into Q2 2026.
Peer | Key Signal | BALL Read-Through | Direction |
CCK (Q2 2026) | Global bev. can volumes +5%; N. America +5%; Europe +7%; raised FY guidance | Supports BALL’s mid-single-digit Q2 volume guidance; confirms tight European market | Positive |
CCK (Q2 2026) | Latin America volumes -10%; Brazil lower-end consumer soft | Partial negative for BALL’s South America “low double/teens” guidance; watch customer mix | Cautionary |
CCK (Q2 2026) | World Cup ~2% of N. America volumes; won’t recur in Q3 | Modest Q2 tailwind for BALL N. America; Q3 comp headwind | Mixed |
AA (Q2 2026) | Packaging is strongest aluminum end market; demand resilient in N. America & Europe | Confirms structural demand tailwind for BALL’s beverage can volumes | Positive |
AA (Q2 2026) | LME prices fell sharply in late June; regional premiums strengthened | Lower LME may reduce BALL’s pass-through revenue; limited EPS impact given pass-through model | Neutral/Minor |
SLGN (Q2 2026) | Brazil volumes -15% YoY; recovery expected Q4 2026 | Second data point on Brazil softness; raises risk to BALL’s bullish S. America guidance | Cautionary |
SLGN (Q2 2026) | CPG customers promoting more; “much greater focus on volume” | Supports BALL’s promotional tailwind thesis (World Cup, America 250) | Positive |
Key Takeaway: The most important development since Q1 earnings is the Wells Fargo conference reaffirmation (June 10) where CEO Ron Lewis upgraded South America guidance to “low double, maybe teens” for Q2 and the full year — a meaningful positive revision that drove the stock’s late-June rally. No analyst rating changes were found in the period.
Key Takeaway: No open-market buys or discretionary sells by executives or directors since Q1 earnings. The only Form 4 activity reflects routine deferred compensation plan conversions and RSU settlements by two directors on June 15, 2026 — these are obligation-driven and carry no informational signal about management’s view of the stock.
Name | Title | Transaction Type | Security | Shares | Date | Note |
Ross, Cathy D. | Director | Deferred Comp. Plan Conversion (Acquisition) | Deferred Comp. Co. Stock Plan | 102 | June 15, 2026 | Routine plan conversion; not a discretionary open-market buy |
Ross, Cathy D. | Director | RSU Settlement (Disposition) | Restricted Stock Units | 102 | June 15, 2026 | RSU vesting/settlement; obligation-driven, not a discretionary sale |
Sapp, Betty J. | Director | Director Compensation Grant (Acquisition) | Deferred Comp. Co. Stock Plan | 229 | June 15, 2026 | Annual director compensation grant; routine |
Sapp, Betty J. | Director | Deferred Comp. Plan Conversion (Acquisition) | Deferred Comp. Co. Stock Plan | 1,145 | June 15, 2026 | Routine plan conversion; not a discretionary open-market buy |
Sapp, Betty J. | Director | RSU Settlement (Disposition) | Restricted Stock Units | 1,145 | June 15, 2026 | RSU vesting/settlement; obligation-driven, not a discretionary sale |
All Form 4 activity on June 15, 2026 relates to routine director compensation plan mechanics (deferred compensation conversions and RSU settlements). These transactions are obligation-driven and carry no informational signal. There were no open-market purchases (Form 4 code P) or discretionary sales (Form 4 code S) by any executive officer or director during the period from May 5 to August 3, 2026. The absence of insider buying despite the stock’s +14% rally is neutral — not a negative signal given the stock’s strong performance. Source: SEC Form 4 Filings / Insider Transaction Data.