Company | Constellation Energy Corporation | Ticker | CEG |
Upcoming Earnings | Q2 2026 (reporting imminently) | Prepared | August 5, 2026 |
Last Earnings | Q1 2026 — May 11, 2026 | Sector ETF | XLU (Utilities Select Sector SPDR) |
Key Takeaway: The setup is moderately constructive — consensus sits at $2.31 adjusted operating EPS for Q2 2026, a bar CEG has consistently cleared, but the bigger swing factor is whether management signals progress on hyperscaler deal closings and provides any color on the upper half of FY2026 guidance ($11–$12/share).
Heading into Q2 2026 results, the bar for CEG looks beatable on the core nuclear operations side — the fleet ran at a 92.3% capacity factor in Q1 and the company has a track record of operational outperformance — but the stock has already given back roughly 11.5% since the Q1 print (vs. XLU −3.3% and SPY +4.1%), suggesting the market is pricing in execution risk rather than a clean beat. Management affirmed FY2026 adjusted operating EPS guidance of $11.00–$12.00/share on the Q1 call but explicitly noted it needed “at least another quarter of data” before expressing confidence in the upper half of the range, leaving the tone cautious-to-neutral. Estimate revisions have been modestly positive since the Q1 print, with the Q2 2026 consensus moving from $2.47 (as of May 16) to $2.31 currently, a slight downward drift that likely reflects the absence of new hyperscaler deal announcements and softer near-term power price dynamics in ERCOT. The stock’s de-rating from its post-Calpine close highs reflects multiple compression as the market awaits regulatory clarity on co-location rules from FERC and PJM, with the PJM capacity auction result of $325/MW for 18,875 MW of CEG capacity (announced July 14) providing a meaningful earnings tailwind for 2028–2029 that is not yet fully in near-term numbers. The single biggest wildcard is whether management provides any signal on imminent hyperscaler deal closings or upgrades its confidence in the upper half of FY2026 guidance — either would likely re-rate the stock sharply higher from current levels.
Key Takeaway: Consensus sets a manageable bar on adjusted operating EPS ($2.31 for Q2 2026 vs. $1.91 in Q2 2025), but the bigger swing factor is nuclear capacity factor and any forward commentary on commercial margins and hyperscaler deal pipeline — the latter is not in consensus numbers but will drive the stock reaction.
KPI | Q1 2026 Actual | Q2 2025 Actual (Prior Year) | Q2 2026 Consensus Estimate | YoY Change | FY2026 Guidance | Consensus vs. Guidance Midpoint |
Adj. Operating EPS ($) | $2.74 | $1.91 | $2.31 | +21.2% YoY | $11.00–$12.00 (FY) | N/A (quarterly vs. FY) |
Total Revenue — Operating ($B) | $10.01B | $6.01B | $8.25B | +37.2% YoY | N/A (no quarterly rev. guidance) | N/A |
Nuclear Capacity Factor (%) | 92.3% (actual: 83.96%) | 78.9% | ~87.97% (VA consensus) | +~9 ppts YoY | N/A (no explicit guidance) | N/A |
Capacity Revenue ($M) | $1,058.6M | $569.1M | $1,058.6M (VA consensus) | +86.0% YoY | N/A (no quarterly guidance) | N/A |
O&M Expenses — Operating ($B) | $1.849B | $1.541B | $1.788B (VA consensus) | +16.0% YoY | ($6,900M) FY adj. O&M | N/A (quarterly vs. FY) |
Free Cash Flow ($B, analyst pub.) | ($0.383B) | $0.770B | $0.787B (VA consensus) | N/M (Q1 typically negative) | N/A (no quarterly guidance) | N/A |
Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data. Q2 2026 consensus as of August 5, 2026. Q1 2026 actuals from Q1 2026 earnings release (May 11, 2026). FY2026 guidance from Q1 2026 earnings call (May 11, 2026). Note: Q1 2026 total capacity factor actual per VA is 83.96%; the 92.3% figure cited by management refers specifically to the nuclear fleet capacity factor.
Quarter | Reported ($) | Consensus ($) | Surprise % | Result |
Q1 2026 | $2.74 | $2.34 | +17.1% | Beat |
Q4 2025 | $2.30 | $2.27 | +1.5% | Beat |
Q3 2025 | $3.04 | $3.13 | −2.9% | Miss |
Q2 2025 | $1.91 | $1.82 | +4.9% | Beat |
Q1 2025 | $2.14 | $2.26 | −5.3% | Miss |
Q4 2024 | $2.44 | $2.14 | +14.0% | Beat |
Q3 2024 | $2.74 | $2.39 | +14.6% | Beat |
Q2 2024 | $1.68 | $1.51 | +11.3% | Beat |
Pattern: CEG has beaten adjusted operating EPS consensus in 6 of the last 8 quarters, with beats averaging ~+12% and misses averaging ~−4%; the two misses (Q1 2025, Q3 2025) were driven by higher-than-expected outage days and cost headwinds, suggesting operational execution is the primary beat/miss driver rather than pricing.
Quarter | Reported (%) | Consensus (%) | Surprise (ppts) | Result |
Q1 2026 | 83.96% | 76.77% | +7.2 ppts | Beat |
Q4 2025 | 78.34% | 71.29% | +7.1 ppts | Beat |
Q3 2025 | 83.81% | 73.27% | +10.5 ppts | Beat |
Q2 2025 | 78.94% | 70.89% | +8.0 ppts | Beat |
Q1 2025 | 82.33% | 71.94% | +10.4 ppts | Beat |
Q4 2024 | 78.23% | 69.60% | +8.6 ppts | Beat |
Q3 2024 | 82.04% | 71.77% | +10.3 ppts | Beat |
Q2 2024 | 78.28% | 67.56% | +10.7 ppts | Beat |
Pattern: CEG has beaten nuclear capacity factor consensus in all 8 of the last 8 quarters by an average of ~9 percentage points, reflecting a consistent structural underestimation by the Street of fleet operational performance. This persistent beat pattern suggests the Q2 2026 consensus of ~87.97% may again prove conservative.
Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data.
Key Takeaway: FY2026 adjusted operating EPS guidance of $11.00–$12.00/share was affirmed on the Q1 2026 call with no revision; management’s tone was cautious-to-neutral, explicitly noting it needed another quarter of data before expressing confidence in the upper half of the range — the key watch item for Q2 is whether that language shifts.
Metric | Initial Guidance (Q1 2026 Call — May 11, 2026) | Revised Guidance | Current Consensus | Note |
FY2026 Adj. Operating EPS | $11.00–$12.00/share | Unchanged | $11.86/share | Affirmed; management noted “at least another quarter of data” needed before confidence in upper half of range |
FY2026 Adj. O&M (excl. perf. incentive adj.) | ($6,900M) | Unchanged | N/A — not tracked in VA | Affirmed on Q1 call; no post-earnings update |
FY2026 Commercial Power Margins | $4.25–$4.35/MWh on 245M MWhs | Unchanged | N/A — not tracked in VA | Affirmed on Q1 call; management noted margins tracking above long-term averages |
FY2026 Total Nuclear Volumes | 179M MWhs; 15 planned refueling outages | Unchanged | N/A — not tracked in VA | Affirmed on Q1 call; Q1 completed 2 outages (avg. 23 days) |
FY2026 Base EPS Growth Target (2026–2029) | 20%+ CAGR; 10%+ rolling 3-yr minimum | Unchanged | N/A | Long-term framework reiterated; no post-earnings update |
Hyperscaler Deal Pipeline | No new deal announced; pipeline active; regulatory clarity needed | Unchanged | N/A | AWS Calvert Cliffs open house (late March 2026); PUCT approved CyrusOne/Freestone co-location (first regulatory approval); Nvidia/Emerald AI partnership announced; no formal deal signed |
Key Takeaway: Q2 2026 EPS estimates have drifted slightly lower since the Q1 print (from $2.47 to $2.31, −6.5%), likely reflecting the absence of new hyperscaler deal announcements and softer ERCOT power prices; FY2026 estimates have held relatively firm near the midpoint of guidance, suggesting the Street is not yet pricing in the upper half of the range.
KPI (Period) | Estimate (May 16, 2026 — ~5 Days Post Q1 Print) | Current Consensus | Estimate Δ (%) | Initial Guidance (Q1 2026 Call) | Current Guidance | Guidance Δ | Consensus vs. Guidance (%) |
Adj. Operating EPS — Q2 2026 | $2.47 | $2.31 | −6.5% | N/A (no quarterly guidance) | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Adj. Operating EPS — FY2026 | $11.86 | $11.86 | 0.0% | $11.00–$12.00 | $11.00–$12.00 (unchanged) | Unchanged | −1.2% vs. midpoint ($11.50) |
Adj. Operating EPS — FY2027 | $13.56 | $13.56 | 0.0% | 20%+ CAGR from FY2026 base | Unchanged | Unchanged | Consistent with 20%+ CAGR target |
Total Revenue — Operating, Q2 2026 | N/A (not available as of 5/16) | $8.25B | N/A | N/A (no quarterly guidance) | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Nuclear Capacity Factor, Q2 2026 | N/A (not available as of 5/16) | ~87.97% | N/A | N/A (no quarterly guidance) | N/A | N/A | N/A |
The slight downward drift in Q2 2026 EPS estimates (−6.5% since the Q1 print) likely reflects the absence of new hyperscaler deal announcements and softer ERCOT power prices (NRG noted ERCOT Houston around-the-clock prices averaged $33/MWh in Q2, well below planning assumptions). FY2026 consensus has been remarkably stable at $11.86, sitting just below the guidance midpoint of $11.50 — the Street is not yet pricing in the upper half of the range, which represents potential upside if management upgrades its tone on Q2.
Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data. Baseline as of May 16, 2026 (~5 trading days post Q1 2026 earnings). Current consensus as of August 5, 2026.
Key Takeaway: CEG has underperformed both XLU (−3.3%) and the S&P 500 (+4.1%) by a wide margin since the Q1 2026 earnings print, declining 11.5% from $299.69 to $265.12 — the de-rating reflects multiple compression driven by the absence of new hyperscaler deal announcements, the Calpine lockup expiry (June 30), and softer near-term power price dynamics, not a deterioration in underlying fundamentals.
CEG vs. XLU (Utilities ETF) vs. S&P 500 (SPY) — Indexed to 100 at Q1 2026 Earnings (May 11, 2026). Source: Stock Price Data (Yahoo Finance).
Key observations: CEG peaked at ~$301.57 (indexed ~100.6) on May 26 before a sharp selloff through mid-June, bottoming near $242 (indexed ~80.8) on June 10. The stock partially recovered through late June on PJM market reform optimism, then sold off again through July 1 (indexed ~78.9) before recovering to the $265–$275 range. The PJM capacity auction result ($325/MW, 18,875 MW cleared) announced July 14 provided a brief lift but did not sustain a re-rating. The Calpine lockup expiry on June 30 (first tranche) coincided with the trough, suggesting technical selling pressure was a meaningful contributor. XLU has been broadly flat to slightly down (−3.3%) while SPY has rallied +4.1%, highlighting that CEG’s underperformance is company-specific rather than sector-driven.
Key Takeaway: Q2 2026 earnings calls from NEE, NRG, EXC, ETR, D, and DUK collectively confirm that power demand is accelerating faster than supply, PJM capacity markets remain structurally tight (third consecutive auction at the FERC price cap), and hyperscaler deal activity is robust — all constructive read-throughs for CEG’s nuclear and capacity revenue outlook. The key negative read-through is NRG’s commentary on soft ERCOT power prices ($33/MWh in Q2 vs. $52 planning assumption), which is relevant to CEG’s Calpine gas fleet.
Read-through relevance: Positive for CEG’s nuclear and capacity revenue outlook; confirms accelerating power demand and premium pricing for clean energy.
Read-through relevance: Mixed — positive on hyperscaler deal structure and PJM market tightness; negative on ERCOT power prices (relevant to CEG’s Calpine gas fleet).
Read-through relevance: Positive for CEG’s PJM capacity market thesis; confirms structural supply shortfall and scarcity pricing dynamics.
Read-through relevance: Positive for CEG’s nuclear asset value (Millstone read-through) and data center demand durability in the Mid-Atlantic/PJM region.
Read-through relevance: Positive for CEG’s data center demand thesis and nuclear asset scarcity value; confirms accelerating load growth and the need for all-of-the-above generation.
Read-through relevance: Positive for CEG’s hyperscaler demand thesis; confirms broad-based industrial and data center demand growth across multiple regions.
Theme | Direction | Key Data Point | Source |
PJM capacity market scarcity | Positive | 3rd consecutive auction at FERC price cap; 6.8 GW shortfall; uncapped price ~$555/MW-day | EXC Q2 2026 |
Record power demand / peak events | Positive | PJM record 168 GW peak (July); Dom zone 9 of top-10 all-time peak days in 2026; prices surged to $800/MWh | EXC, D Q2 2026 |
Hyperscaler deal activity accelerating | Positive | NRG signed 1.2 GW BYOP deal; NEE has 30 hubs in discussion; D added 5 GW of contracts since year-end; ETR pipeline "very, very active" | NRG, NEE, D, ETR Q2 2026 |
Premium pricing for clean/reliable power | Positive | NEE recontracting at +$20/MWh premium; Millstone PPA saving CT customers $300M+ this year | NEE, D Q2 2026 |
New nuclear: high barriers, long lead times | Positive (for existing fleet) | DUK: "additional financial protections needed before proposing new nuclear"; NEE: risk-sharing structures required | DUK, NEE Q2 2026 |
ERCOT power prices soft | Negative | NRG: ERCOT Houston ATC prices $33/MWh in Q2 vs. $52 planning assumption; "market is not valuing anything right now" | NRG Q2 2026 |
Key Takeaway: The most important development since the Q1 2026 earnings call is the PJM 2028–2029 capacity auction result — CEG cleared 18,875 MW at $325/MW, locking in a substantial capacity revenue stream that is not yet fully reflected in near-term consensus estimates. The CEO being named Board Chair on the day of Q2 earnings is a notable governance development to watch.
Key Takeaway: No open-market buys or sells by insiders were identified in the period since the Q1 2026 earnings call (May 11, 2026 through August 5, 2026). The only Form 4 filing was a routine deferred compensation award to a director — nothing notable to flag.
Name | Title | Transaction Type | Value | Date | Note |
Charles L. Harrington | Director | Award (Code A) — Deferred Compensation | 146 phantom share equivalents | June 30, 2026 | Routine deferred compensation award; not an open-market transaction. Not a buy or sell signal. |
No open-market buys (Form 4 Code P) or open-market sells (Form 4 Code S) were identified for CEG insiders in the period from May 11, 2026 through August 5, 2026. The absence of insider selling ahead of earnings is a neutral-to-slightly-positive signal. Note that management repurchased approximately 1.2 million shares at the corporate level shortly after the March 31, 2026 call at prices management described as compelling — this corporate buyback activity (not insider Form 4 activity) was the more meaningful signal of management conviction.
Source: Insider Transaction Data (SEC Form 4 filings).