Company | Constellation Energy Corporation |
Ticker | CEG (NASDAQ) |
Reporting Period | Q2 2026 (quarter ended June 30, 2026) |
Earnings Date | August 6, 2026 — Earnings Call at 10:00 AM ET |
Prepared | August 5, 2026 |
Last Earnings | May 11, 2026 (Q1 2026) |
Key Takeaway: The setup into Q2 2026 is a moderate beat, with consensus at $2.31 adjusted operating EPS sitting below the Q1 2026 print of $2.74 and well within the full-year $11–$12 guidance range; the single biggest swing factor is whether management announces a new hyperscaler deal or provides a concrete timeline for PJM regulatory clarity.
Heading into Q2 2026, the bar for Constellation Energy appears achievable: consensus adjusted operating EPS of $2.31 represents a modest step-down from Q1’s $2.74 beat, reflecting seasonally higher planned nuclear refueling outages and the absence of Winter Storm Fern tailwinds, but the full-year $11–$12 guidance range remains intact and management has shown a pattern of conservative framing. Management’s tone since the May 11 Q1 call has been constructive but patient — the PUCT approval for the CyrusOne co-location at Freestone (first regulatory green light for a Powered Land deal) and the July 14 PJM capacity auction clearing 18,875 MW at $325/MW-day for 2028 are both incremental positives that post-date the last print. Estimate revisions have drifted modestly lower since May (from ~$2.47 to $2.31 for Q2), suggesting the street has trimmed seasonal expectations rather than signaling fundamental concern. The stock is down roughly 11% since the Q1 print and has underperformed both XLU and the S&P 500 over the period, implying the market has not priced in a beat — leaving room for a positive reaction if management delivers on EPS and, more importantly, provides any incremental color on hyperscaler deal timing or PJM rule finalization. The wildcard is a new named hyperscaler contract announcement: management guided that regulatory clarity from FERC/PJM (expected by year-end) is the gating factor, and any signal of acceleration — or further delay — will dominate the stock reaction regardless of the EPS print.
Key Takeaway: Consensus is a low-to-moderate bar on adjusted EPS ($2.31 vs. $2.74 last quarter), with the nuclear capacity factor the bigger swing factor — Q2 typically carries fewer planned outage days than Q1, which should support a higher capacity factor and incremental upside to the EPS print.
KPI | Q1 2026 Actual | Q2 2025 Actual (Prior Year) | Q2 2026 Consensus Estimate | YoY Change | FY 2026 Guidance | Consensus vs. Guidance Midpoint |
Adjusted Operating EPS ($) | $2.74 | $1.91 | $2.31 | +21.2% YoY | $11.00–$12.00 (midpoint $11.50) | FY consensus $11.61 vs. midpoint: +1.0% |
Operating EBITDA ($B) | $2.50B | $1.36B | $1.83B | +34.6% YoY | N/A (quarterly not guided) | N/A |
Nuclear Capacity Factor (%) | 92.3% (99 planned outage days) | 92.9% | ~92.8% (consensus) | -0.1 ppt YoY | N/A (operational metric) | N/A |
Total Operating Revenue ($B) | $10.01B | $6.01B | $8.25B | +37.2% YoY | N/A (quarterly not guided) | N/A |
Free Cash Flow — Analyst Published ($B) | -$0.38B | $0.77B | $0.79B | +2.6% YoY | $8.4B (2026–2027 cumulative) | N/A (cumulative metric) |
Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data. Q2 2026 consensus as of August 5, 2026. FY 2026 guidance affirmed on Q1 2026 earnings call (May 11, 2026). Q1 2026 actuals from CEG Q1 2026 earnings release (May 11, 2026). Revenue and EBITDA figures reflect post-Calpine acquisition consolidated reporting beginning Q1 2026.
Quarter | Reported ($) | Consensus ($) | Surprise (%) | Result |
Q2 2024 | $1.68 | $1.51 | +11.3% | Beat |
Q3 2024 | $2.74 | $2.39 | +14.6% | Beat |
Q4 2024 | $2.44 | $2.14 | +14.0% | Beat |
Q1 2025 | $2.14 | $2.26 | -5.3% | Miss |
Q2 2025 | $1.91 | $1.82 | +4.9% | Beat |
Q3 2025 | $3.04 | $3.13 | -2.9% | Miss |
Q4 2025 | $2.30 | $2.27 | +1.3% | Beat |
Q1 2026 | $2.74 | $2.34 | +17.1% | Beat |
Pattern: CEG has beaten adjusted operating EPS consensus in 6 of the last 8 quarters, with the two misses (Q1 2025, Q3 2025) both modest and driven by specific one-time factors (higher outage days, lower ZEC pricing). The Q1 2026 beat of +17.1% was the largest in the trailing 8-quarter window, driven by Calpine accretion and favorable stock-based compensation. Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data.
Quarter | Reported (%) | Consensus (%) | Surprise (ppt) | Result |
Q2 2024 | 91.7% | 91.1% | +0.6 ppt | Beat |
Q3 2024 | 95.0% | 95.8% | -0.8 ppt | Miss |
Q4 2024 | 93.1% | 92.9% | +0.2 ppt | Beat |
Q1 2025 | 96.5% | 97.0% | -0.5 ppt | Miss |
Q2 2025 | 92.9% | 94.7% | -1.8 ppt | Miss |
Q3 2025 | 95.5% | 95.6% | -0.1 ppt | Miss |
Q4 2025 | 93.6% | 93.8% | -0.2 ppt | Miss |
Q1 2026 | 95.0% | 98.2% | -3.2 ppt | Miss |
Pattern: Nuclear capacity factor has missed consensus in 6 of the last 8 quarters, reflecting the street’s tendency to model optimistically on this metric. The Q1 2026 miss of -3.2 ppt was the largest in the window, driven by 99 planned refueling outage days (vs. 88 in Q1 2025). Q2 typically carries fewer planned outages, which should support a higher realized capacity factor relative to consensus. Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data.
Key Takeaway: Full-year 2026 adjusted operating EPS guidance of $11–$12 was affirmed on the Q1 2026 call and has not been revised since; the only material post-earnings development is the July 14 PJM capacity auction result (18,875 MW cleared at $325/MW-day for 2028–2029), which is incrementally positive for outer-year earnings but does not change 2026 guidance.
Metric | Initial Guidance (Q1 2026 Call — May 11, 2026) | Revised Guidance | Current Consensus | Note |
FY 2026 Adjusted Operating EPS | $11.00–$12.00 per share (midpoint $11.50) | Unchanged | $11.61 | Affirmed on Q1 2026 call; management noted “at least another quarter of data needed” before expressing confidence in upper half of range |
Base EPS CAGR (2026–2029) | 20%+ compound annual growth rate | Unchanged | N/A (multi-year target) | Long-term rolling 3-year Base EPS growth target of 10%+ also reiterated |
Free Cash Flow Before Growth (2026–2027) | $8.4B cumulative | Unchanged | $1.94B (FY 2026 consensus) | 2028–2029 FCFbG guided at $11.5–$13.0B cumulative; management emphasized this metric as underappreciated |
PJM Capacity Revenue (2028–2029) | Not explicitly guided at Q1 call | 18,875 MW cleared at $325/MW-day (July 14, 2026 8-K) | N/A (outer-year item) | ↑ Positive post-earnings update via 8-K July 14, 2026; all PJM plants cleared; capacity revenues included in nuclear PTC gross receipts calculation |
Share Buyback Authorization | $5.0B authorization; ~$335M deployed YTD as of Q1 call | Unchanged | N/A | $4.7B remaining authorization as of May 11, 2026 |
Hyperscaler / Data Center Contracting | No new deal announced; awaiting PJM/FERC regulatory clarity | No change; PUCT approved CyrusOne Freestone net metering (subject to conditions) | N/A | First regulatory approval for a Powered Land co-location deal; substation construction underway; power delivery targeted Q4 2026 |
Key Takeaway: Q2 2026 EPS estimates have drifted ~6.5% lower since the Q1 print (from $2.47 to $2.31), likely reflecting seasonal conservatism and the absence of a new hyperscaler deal announcement; FY 2026 estimates are essentially flat vs. the post-Q1 baseline, suggesting the street is comfortable with the $11–$12 guidance range and not pricing in meaningful upside or downside.
KPI & Period | Estimate ~5 Days Post Q1 Earnings (May 18, 2026) | Current Consensus (Aug 5, 2026) | Estimate Δ (%) | Initial Guidance (Q1 2026 Call) | Current Guidance | Guidance Δ | Consensus vs. Guidance (%) |
Adj. Operating EPS — Q2 2026 | $2.47 | $2.31 | -6.5% | No quarterly guidance provided | No quarterly guidance provided | N/A | N/A |
Adj. Operating EPS — FY 2026 | $11.86 | $11.61 | -2.1% | $11.00–$12.00 (midpoint $11.50) | $11.00–$12.00 (unchanged) | Unchanged | +1.0% above midpoint |
Adj. Operating EPS — FY 2027 | $13.56 | $13.26 | -2.2% | 20%+ CAGR from 2026 base | Unchanged | Unchanged | Consistent with 20%+ CAGR target |
Operating EBITDA — Q2 2026 | N/A (not available as of 5/18/26) | $1.83B | N/A | No quarterly guidance provided | No quarterly guidance provided | N/A | N/A |
Operating EBITDA — FY 2026 | $8.44B | $8.74B | +3.6% | No explicit EBITDA guidance | No explicit EBITDA guidance | N/A | N/A |
Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data. Post-Q1 baseline uses consensus as of May 18, 2026 (approximately 5 trading days after the May 11, 2026 Q1 earnings release). Current consensus as of August 5, 2026. The modest downward drift in Q2 and FY 2026 EPS estimates reflects seasonal conservatism and the absence of new hyperscaler deal announcements, not a fundamental deterioration in the earnings outlook. FY 2026 consensus of $11.61 remains above the guidance midpoint of $11.50, suggesting the street is positioned for a slight beat on the full year.
Key Takeaway: CEG has underperformed both XLU (-11% vs. -3% for XLU and +4% for SPY since the Q1 print), driven almost entirely by multiple compression rather than estimate cuts — the EV/EBITDA multiple has contracted ~9% since May 11 — suggesting the market is discounting the hyperscaler deal pipeline and PJM regulatory uncertainty rather than questioning the base earnings trajectory.
CEG vs. XLU vs. S&P 500 (SPY) — Indexed to 100 at Q1 2026 Earnings Date (May 11, 2026). Source: Yahoo Finance / Stock Price Data.
Sector ETF: XLU (Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund) was used as the sector benchmark. CEG is classified in the Utilities sector but trades with a significant premium to traditional regulated utilities given its merchant nuclear and competitive power generation exposure. XLU is the most widely used sector benchmark for CEG despite the company’s differentiated business model.
Performance Summary (May 11 – August 5, 2026):
Valuation Context: CEG’s NTM EV/EBITDA has compressed from ~14.0x (3 months ago) to ~13.0x currently, a -7.3% contraction. NTM P/E has compressed from ~26.6x to ~21.2x (-20%). The multiple de-rating has been the primary driver of underperformance, not estimate cuts — a pattern consistent with the market pricing out the hyperscaler deal premium rather than questioning the base nuclear earnings power. Source: Stock Price Data (Yahoo Finance); Valuation multiples from Visible Alpha / Implied platform.
Key Takeaway: The most important post-Q1 development is the July 14 PJM capacity auction result — all 18,875 MW of CEG’s PJM fleet cleared at $325/MW-day for 2028–2029, providing significant outer-year earnings visibility and confirming the structural tightness of the PJM capacity market.
Key Takeaway: Peers reporting Q2 2026 results in the last 60 days paint a consistently bullish picture for CEG’s Q2 and near-term outlook: PJM fundamentals are strengthening materially (capacity prices at cap, spark spreads up ~50% YoY), data center demand is driving record peak load days in July, and FERC’s Section 206 show cause orders are expected to create a “market shift” favoring reliable baseload generation — all of which directly benefit CEG’s nuclear and gas fleet.
Scope Note: The following read-throughs are drawn exclusively from peer earnings calls and 8-K filings made between June 6 and August 5, 2026 (the last 60 days). Only forward-looking commentary pertaining to current Q2/Q3 2026 conditions or ongoing market trends is included. Backward-looking peer-quarter results commentary has been excluded.
Relevance: Talen is a direct PJM peer with nuclear and gas generation assets. Its Q2 2026 commentary is the most directly applicable read-through for CEG.
Relevance: NEE is the largest U.S. clean energy company and a bellwether for power demand trends, hyperscaler contracting, and regulatory developments affecting competitive generators.
Relevance: Dominion serves the Virginia data center corridor (the world’s largest data center market) and operates in PJM, making its demand commentary directly relevant to CEG’s PJM generation assets.
Relevance: NRG is a competitive power generator with significant PJM and ERCOT exposure, and recently closed the LS Power acquisition. Its commentary on wholesale prices, hedging, and data center contracting structures is directly relevant to CEG.
Relevance: Entergy is a regulated utility with a large data center pipeline in the Southeast. Its commentary on demand trends and new nuclear deployment is relevant to the broader power market context for CEG.
Peer | Call Date | Key Theme | CEG Read-Through Direction | Magnitude |
Talen Energy (TLN) | Aug 5, 2026 | PJM spark spreads +50% YoY; record July peak load days; capacity at price cap; RBP finalization by Sept 29 | Positive | High — direct PJM peer |
NextEra Energy (NEE) | Jul 24, 2026 | Supply-demand imbalance driving +$20/MWh recontracting premium; FERC Section 206 orders to create market shift favoring baseload | Positive | High — national demand/regulatory read-through |
Dominion Energy (D) | Jul 31, 2026 | 9 of 10 all-time peak days in 2026; 53 GW data center pipeline; Millstone nuclear policy support | Positive | High — PJM/DOM zone demand directly relevant |
NRG Energy (NRG) | Aug 4, 2026 | PJM prices strengthening but hedges limit near-term benefit; ERCOT soft in Q2; BYOP model validated; Virginia RGGI cost risk | Mixed | Medium — hedging/ERCOT nuances apply to CEG |
Entergy (ETR) | Jul 29, 2026 | Data center pipeline very active; new nuclear deployment still years away — reinforces existing fleet scarcity value | Positive | Medium — structural/long-term read-through |
Key Takeaway: No open-market insider purchases or sales were identified for CEG in the period since the Q1 2026 earnings call (May 11, 2026 through August 5, 2026) based on available SEC Form 4 data. The absence of insider selling is a mild positive signal, and the company’s own share repurchase activity (~$335M deployed YTD as of the Q1 call) represents the most meaningful ‘insider’ signal — management buying back stock at prices they described as “compelling.”
Name | Title | Transaction Type | Value | Date | Note |
No open-market insider transactions identified (May 11 – Aug 5, 2026) | — | — | — | — | No Form 4 open-market buys (code P) or sales (code S) found in the query window. Source: SEC Form 4 Filings Database. |
Corporate Buyback as Insider Signal: While no individual insider open-market transactions were identified, the company’s own share repurchase program is the most meaningful signal of management’s view on valuation. Management repurchased approximately 1.2 million shares shortly after the March 31 guidance call at prices they described as “compelling,” and has deployed ~$335M YTD under the $5.0B authorization ($4.7B remaining). With the stock now trading ~11% below the Q1 earnings date price, the buyback authorization provides significant capacity to continue repurchasing at what management would likely view as even more attractive levels. Source: CEG Q1 2026 Earnings Call (May 11, 2026).