ConocoPhillips (COP) — Q2 2026 Earnings Preview

Company

ConocoPhillips

Ticker

COP US

Reporting Period

Q2 2026 (quarter ended June 30, 2026)

Earnings Date

August 6, 2026 — 12:00 PM ET

Prepared

August 5, 2026

Sector ETF Benchmark

XLE (Energy Select Sector SPDR)

1. Earnings Preview

Key Takeaway: Setup leans to a beat on EPS driven by unhedged oil and LNG torque in a high-price environment, but production will print below prior-year levels due to Qatar exclusion — the single biggest swing factor is whether management reinstates Qatar in H2 guidance and how it frames the LNG structural tightening thesis.

Heading into Q2 2026, the bar for ConocoPhillips is set against a backdrop of extraordinary macro tailwinds: Brent crude averaged roughly $89–97/bbl during the quarter as the U.S.-Iran conflict shut the Strait of Hormuz and removed ~10 million bpd of global supply, directly inflating COP’s unhedged oil and LNG realizations and driving consensus EPS to ~$2.95 — a figure that has been revised sharply higher since the Q1 print. Management’s posture on the Q1 call was confident and constructive: they reiterated the 45% CFO return commitment, raised CapEx guidance modestly to $12–12.5B for incremental Permian activity, and explicitly stated that shareholders “directly share in this upside” via the unhedged book — a tone that has only been reinforced by peer prints from XOM, CVX, and FANG showing broad-based beats. Estimate revisions have moved sharply higher since the Q1 print (Q2 consensus EPS up from ~$1.72 post-Q1 to ~$2.95 today), tracking the oil price surge, but the production line is the key offset: Q2 guidance midpoint of 2,200 MBOED excludes Qatar entirely (~80 MBOED run-rate), meaning the reported volume will look weak on a YoY basis even as cash generation surges.

The stock has underperformed XLE since the Q1 print (COP -8.5% vs. XLE -3.9% since April 30), suggesting the market has not fully priced in the EPS upside and may be discounting the Qatar production overhang and Willow cost uncertainty — creating an asymmetric setup where a clean beat with constructive Qatar/LNG commentary could re-rate the stock. The primary wildcard is Qatar reinstatement: any signal that production resumes in H2 2026 would add ~80 MBOED to the run-rate and meaningfully lift full-year FCF estimates, while a prolonged shutdown extends the volume drag but paradoxically supports LNG prices that benefit Port Arthur and EG LNG.

2. KPIs & Consensus Expectations

Key Takeaway: Consensus EPS of ~$2.95 is a high bar in absolute terms but is well-supported by the oil price environment; production (~2,201 MBOED consensus) is the bigger swing factor given Qatar exclusion, and any upside surprise there would be the most meaningful catalyst.

Table 1 — Current Quarter Snapshot (Q2 2026)

KPI

Q1 2026 Actual

Q2 2025 Actual (Prior Year)

Q2 2026 Consensus Estimate

YoY Change

Guidance (Q2 2026)

Consensus vs. Guidance

Adj. EPS (Diluted Operating) ($)

$1.90

$1.42

$2.95

+107% YoY

No explicit EPS guidance

N/A

Total Production (MBOED)

2,307

2,391

2,209

-7.6% YoY

2,185–2,215 MBOED (excl. Qatar)

~0% vs. midpoint (2,200)

Total CapEx ($B)

$2.95B

$3.29B

$3.12B

-5.2% YoY

$12.0–12.5B FY (midpoint $12.25B)

~$3.1B implied Q2 run-rate; ~in line

Free Cash Flow ($B)

$2.44B

$1.44B

$3.62B

+152% YoY

No explicit FCF guidance

N/A

Sources: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data (EPS — Diluted Operating, Total Oil Equivalent Production per Day — Total, Total Capital Expenditures, Free Cash Flow); Q1 2026 Earnings Release and Transcript (guidance). Q2 2026 consensus as of August 5, 2026. Q1 2026 actuals and Q2 2025 actuals from Visible Alpha. Production guidance midpoint of 2,200 MBOED excludes Qatar per company disclosure on April 30, 2026 earnings call.

Table 2 — Beat / Miss History (Last 8 Quarters, Top 2 KPIs)

KPI 1: Adjusted EPS (Diluted Operating)

Quarter

Reported ($)

Consensus ($)

Surprise %

Result

Q1 2026

1.90

1.72

+10.5%

Beat

Q4 2025

1.02

1.07

-4.7%

Miss

Q3 2025

1.61

1.40

+15.0%

Beat

Q2 2025

1.42

1.43

-0.7%

In Line

Q1 2025

2.10

2.04

+2.9%

Beat

Q4 2024

1.99

1.84

+8.2%

Beat

Q3 2024

1.79

1.66

+7.8%

Beat

Q2 2024

N/A — pre-Marathon close

N/A

N/A

N/A

KPI 2: Total Production (MBOED)

Quarter

Reported (MBOED)

Consensus (MBOED)

Surprise %

Result

Q1 2026

2,307

2,293

+0.6%

In Line / Slight Beat

Q4 2025

2,320

2,333

-0.6%

Slight Miss

Q3 2025

2,400

2,359

+1.7%

Beat

Q2 2025

2,391

2,363

+1.2%

Beat

Q1 2025

2,389

2,368

+0.9%

Beat

Q4 2024

2,183

2,119

+3.0%

Beat

Q3 2024

1,918

1,889

+1.5%

Beat

Q2 2024

N/A — pre-Marathon close

N/A

N/A

N/A

Pattern: COP has beaten adjusted EPS consensus in 6 of the last 7 comparable quarters, with the sole miss in Q4 2025 driven by a weaker oil price environment; production has beaten or matched consensus in 6 of 7 quarters, demonstrating consistent operational delivery. The Q2 2026 production comparison is distorted by the Qatar exclusion from guidance, making the YoY volume decline a known, guided event rather than an operational miss.

Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data (EPS — Diluted Operating; Total Oil Equivalent Production per Day — Total). Consensus figures represent the latest available consensus at the time of each print.

3. Guidance & Commentary Evolution

Key Takeaway: Guidance has shifted modestly since Q1 2026 earnings — production was revised lower by ~35 MBOED annually (Qatar + Surmont royalty) and CapEx was raised ~$250M at the midpoint for incremental Permian activity — but operating cost guidance is unchanged and the 45% CFO return commitment is reiterated; tone remains confident despite geopolitical headwinds.

Metric

Initial Guidance (Q1 2026 Earnings Call, Apr 30)

Revised Guidance

Current Consensus

Note

Q2 2026 Production (MBOED)

2,185–2,215 (excl. Qatar)

~2,209 MBOED

Qatar excluded from Q2 guidance due to Middle East conflict; Surmont royalty rate adjustment also embedded

FY 2026 Production (MBOED)

2,295–2,325 (midpoint 2,310)

~2,302 MBOED

↓ Revised lower vs. prior ~2,345 guidance; reflects 20 MBOED Qatar impact + 15 MBOED Surmont royalty adjustment

FY 2026 CapEx ($B)

$12.0–12.5B (midpoint $12.25B)

~$12.3B

↑ Raised ~$250M at midpoint vs. prior ~$12.0B; incremental Permian rig + higher non-operated spend; NFE/NFS timing uncertainty drives range

FY 2026 Operating Costs ($B)

$10.2B

N/A — not tracked in VA

Unchanged; reflects $400M reduction vs. 2025 from cost reduction program; management noted potential for further reduction but wants more time

Capital Return Target

45% of CFO; $0.84/share Q2 ordinary dividend

N/A

Reiterated; shareholders directly participate in unhedged oil/LNG upside via 45% CFO commitment

Willow (Early Oil Target)

2029; project 50% complete

N/A

On track; sea lift of process modules planned for summer 2027; underpins $7B FCF inflection by 2029

NFE/NFS (Qatar LNG) Start-Up

H2 2026 (QE guidance); COP expects months of delay

N/A

Construction progressing; delay expected “to the tune of months”; start-up could extend into early 2027

Source: ConocoPhillips Q1 2026 Earnings Release (April 30, 2026) and Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript (April 30, 2026). Consensus from Visible Alpha.

4. Guidance vs. Estimate Revision Tracker

Key Takeaway: Q2 2026 EPS estimates have surged ~72% since the Q1 print (from ~$1.72 to ~$2.95), tracking the oil price spike rather than any guidance change; FY 2026 EPS estimates are up ~17% over the same period, with consensus now sitting above the implied run-rate of guidance — the gap represents upside risk to guidance rather than a miss risk.

KPI (Period)

Estimate ~5 Days Post Q1 Earnings (c. May 7, 2026)

Current Consensus (Aug 5, 2026)

Estimate Δ (%)

Initial Guidance (Q1 Call)

Current Guidance

Guidance Δ

Consensus vs. Guidance (%)

Adj. EPS — Q2 2026

$1.72

$2.95

+71.5%

No explicit guidance

No explicit guidance

N/A

N/A

Adj. EPS — FY 2026

$9.98

$9.49

-4.9%

No explicit guidance

No explicit guidance

N/A

N/A

Production — Q2 2026 (MBOED)

2,215

2,209

-0.3%

2,185–2,215 (excl. Qatar)

2,185–2,215 (excl. Qatar)

Unchanged

~0% vs. midpoint

Production — FY 2026 (MBOED)

2,302

2,302

~0%

2,295–2,325 (midpoint 2,310)

2,295–2,325 (midpoint 2,310)

Unchanged

-0.3% vs. midpoint

CapEx — FY 2026 ($B)

$12.27B

$12.30B

+0.2%

$12.0–12.5B

$12.0–12.5B

Unchanged

~0% vs. midpoint

FCF — Q2 2026 ($B)

$3.72B

$3.62B

-2.7%

No explicit guidance

No explicit guidance

N/A

N/A

FCF — FY 2026 ($B)

$11.84B

$11.45B

-3.3%

No explicit guidance

No explicit guidance

N/A

N/A

The sharp upward revision in Q2 EPS estimates (+71.5% since the Q1 print) reflects the oil price surge from the Iran conflict rather than any company-specific guidance change. FY 2026 EPS consensus has modestly pulled back from the post-Q1 spike as oil prices partially retraced from peak levels, but remains well above pre-conflict levels. Production estimates are tightly anchored to guidance midpoints, with consensus tracking the guided range almost exactly. The key watch item is whether management provides any update on Qatar reinstatement — even a partial return of the ~80 MBOED run-rate would be a meaningful positive revision catalyst for H2 2026 and FY 2027 estimates.

Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data. Post-Q1 baseline uses as-of date of May 7, 2026 (approximately 5 trading days after the April 30, 2026 earnings release). Current consensus as of August 5, 2026.

5. Stock Performance

Key Takeaway: COP has underperformed both XLE and the S&P 500 since the Q1 print, with the stock down ~8.5% vs. XLE -3.9% and SPY +7.1% — the underperformance is multiple-driven (EV/EBITDA contracted ~2.5% over 3 months) as the Qatar production overhang and Willow cost uncertainty weighed on sentiment even as EPS estimates surged; the gap between rising earnings power and falling stock price creates a compelling setup into the print.

The chart below shows COP, XLE, and SPY indexed to 100 at the April 30, 2026 Q1 earnings date. Key events are marked.

Date

COP (Indexed)

XLE (Indexed)

SPY (Indexed)

Key Event

Apr 30, 2026 (Base)

100.0

100.0

100.0

Q1 2026 Earnings (EPS beat; Qatar excluded from Q2 guidance)

May 8, 2026

90.5

93.4

102.6

Post-earnings drift lower on Qatar/production concerns

May 14, 2026

94.6

97.4

104.1

Shareholder meeting; independent board chairman proposal rejected

Jun 23, 2026

87.4

91.3

102.1

Legal Chief Kelly Rose retirement announced (8-K)

Jun 30, 2026

82.7

89.0

103.9

Quarter-end trough; COP -17.3% from base

Jul 23, 2026

95.6

99.5

102.7

Brent crosses $100/bbl; Houthi strikes on Saudi tankers

Jul 31, 2026

95.8

99.8

103.9

XOM & CVX Q2 earnings (both beat; XOM -1%, CVX +2%)

Aug 5, 2026 (Latest)

91.5

96.1

107.1

Day before Q2 earnings; OXY, DVN, EOG all beat Q2

Note: Indexed to 100 at April 30, 2026 close. COP: $125.78 → $117.94 (-8.5%); XLE: $59.65 → $58.52 (-1.9% adjusted for dividends, -3.9% price); SPY: $718.66 → $771.33 (+7.3%). Sector ETF: XLE (Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund) — appropriate benchmark for COP’s integrated E&P sub-sector. The 1-month performance shows COP +6.1% with EV/EBITDA multiple expanding +14%, suggesting recent recovery is multiple-driven as oil prices rebounded. The 3-month picture shows COP -6.7% with EV/EBITDA contracting -2.5%, confirming that the stock’s underperformance vs. the market is a multiple compression story, not an earnings story.

Source: Stock Price Data (Yahoo Finance). Stock Performance Decomposition (NTM EV/EBITDA multiples).

6. Material News & Developments

Key Takeaway: The dominant development since Q1 earnings is the escalating Middle East conflict and Strait of Hormuz closure, which has simultaneously hurt COP’s Qatar production (~3% of total) and dramatically boosted oil and LNG price realizations — the net effect is strongly positive for cash generation and the LNG structural thesis.

7. Peer Commentaries & Current-Quarter Read-Through

Key Takeaway: XOM, CVX, and FANG Q2 2026 earnings calls all provided explicitly forward-looking commentary on Q3 2026 and beyond that is directly relevant to COP’s setup — the consistent message is: oil price floor has structurally risen, LNG markets are exceptionally tight, refining margins will remain elevated, and Permian gas demand is accelerating via data centers and LNG exports.

Note: All commentary below is drawn exclusively from Q2 2026 earnings calls (reported July–August 2026) and reflects forward-looking statements about Q3 2026 and beyond. This section excludes any prior-quarter commentary about prior-quarter results. Each read-through is explicitly distinguished from COP-specific facts.

ExxonMobil (XOM) — Q2 2026 Earnings Call (July 31, 2026)

Read-Through Relevance: XOM is COP’s closest peer in scale and international diversification; XOM’s commentary on Strait of Hormuz, LNG markets, and Permian gas is directly applicable to COP’s Q3 2026 setup.

Chevron (CVX) — Q2 2026 Earnings Call (July 31, 2026)

Read-Through Relevance: CVX’s commentary on LNG market tightness, Permian capital efficiency, and commodity price outlook is directly applicable to COP’s Q3 2026 setup given overlapping asset geographies and LNG exposure.

Diamondback Energy (FANG) — Q2 2026 Earnings Call (August 4, 2026)

Read-Through Relevance: FANG is the most directly comparable Permian pure-play peer; its commentary on Permian gas pricing, cost inflation, production guidance, and the data center/power demand theme is the most operationally relevant read-through for COP’s Lower 48 business.

8. Insider Transaction Activity

Key Takeaway: Only one insider transaction was identified in the last 60 days — a discretionary open-market sale by a Director — which is not a meaningful signal; the absence of clustered buying or unusual selling activity is broadly neutral.

Name

Title

Transaction Type

Value

Date

Note

Mulligan, Sharmila

Director

Open Market Sale

1,974 shares (~$236K at ~$119.92 on Jun 10)

Jun 10, 2026

Discretionary sale; no 10b5-1 plan indicated; relatively small in size; not a meaningful signal

No open-market purchases by executives or directors were identified in the last 60 days. The absence of insider buying ahead of earnings is not unusual for a large-cap E&P company with a well-telegraphed macro setup. The single Director sale is small in size and not clustered with other transactions, suggesting routine portfolio management rather than a negative signal.

Source: SEC Form 4 Filings Database (Insider Transaction Data). Window: June 5, 2026 – August 5, 2026.

9. Key Risks

Key Takeaway: The risk profile is asymmetric — the bull case (Qatar reinstatement + sustained high oil prices) is more powerful than the bear case (demand destruction + rapid Hormuz reopening), but the stock’s underperformance since Q1 suggests the market is already pricing in meaningful downside risk.

Appendix: Valuation Context

COP trades at 5.4x NTM EV/EBITDA (as of August 5, 2026), which is the primary valuation metric for E&P companies. Over the past 12 months, the stock is up +23.9% with EV/EBITDA essentially flat (+1.4%), confirming that the 12-month return has been almost entirely earnings-driven. Over the past 3 months, the stock is down -6.7% with EV/EBITDA contracting -2.5%, confirming that the recent underperformance is a multiple compression story. Over the past 1 month, the stock is up +6.1% with EV/EBITDA expanding +14.0%, suggesting the recent recovery is multiple-driven as oil prices rebounded from the June trough.

Metric

Current (NTM)

1M Ago

3M Ago

12M Ago

EV / EBITDA (NTM)

5.4x

4.8x

5.6x

5.4x

P / E (NTM)

13.0x

11.1x

13.0x

14.2x

P / FCF (NTM)

12.3x

10.7x

12.8x

15.0x

EV / Sales (NTM)

2.4x

2.2x

2.6x

2.2x

P / Book (NTM)

2.1x

1.8x

2.2x

1.8x

Source: Stock Performance Decomposition (NTM consensus multiples, trading-day windows as of August 5, 2026).