Company | DaVita Inc. |
Ticker | NYSE: DVA |
Reporting Period | Q2 2026 (quarter ending June 30, 2026) |
Earnings Date | August 4, 2026 (after market close) |
Prepared | August 3, 2026 |
Key Takeaway: Setup is constructive — consensus is a manageable bar after Q1's large beat, and the biggest swing factor is whether the Fresenius patient-transfer tailwind fully materializes in Q2 volume, which management guided would be the peak benefit quarter.
DaVita heads into Q2 2026 earnings with momentum from a strong Q1 beat (adjusted OI ~$50M ahead of forecast, adjusted EPS of $2.87 vs. consensus ~$2.37) and a subsequent guidance raise, yet the bar for Q2 is now higher — consensus sits at ~$3.85 adjusted EPS and ~$580M adjusted OI, both modestly above the implied Q2 run-rate embedded in the raised full-year range of $2.15–$2.25B. Management guided that OI would be "about evenly split" across the three remaining quarters, implying a Q2 target of roughly $550–$580M, so consensus is tracking near the high end of that range. The tone from the May 12 BofA Healthcare Conference was confident: CFO Joel Ackerman reiterated the 3–7% OI growth algorithm, confirmed ~$50M phosphate binder OI contribution for 2026, and noted that the Fresenius clinic closures — expected to be "largely closed by end of Q2" — would deliver most of their patient-transfer benefit in Q2 and Q3, with the annualization point around end of April/May. Estimate revisions have been essentially flat since the post-Q1 reset (EPS consensus moved from $3.87 to $3.85 in the week after earnings and has not moved since), suggesting the street is comfortable with the bar but not aggressively raising numbers. The stock has re-rated sharply (+53% since Q1 earnings), trading at ~14.7x NTM P/E vs. ~10.5x three months ago, meaning the multiple has done most of the work and the stock needs the volume/RPT story to hold. The key wildcard is the
ACA enhanced premium tax credit headwind: management held its $40M full-year headwind assumption despite Q1 commercial mix coming in flat, and Q2 is the quarter where the headwind was expected to begin building — any upside surprise here (or confirmation that the headwind is tracking below $40M) could be the incremental positive catalyst, while a worse-than-expected commercial mix deterioration would pressure RPT and the full-year guide.
Key Takeaway: Consensus is a
Key Takeaway: Consensus is a moderately high but achievable bar — the Q1 beat was unusually large and some timing benefit reverses in Q2, but the Fresenius transfer tailwind and continued labor productivity should offset.
Treatment volume growth is the bigger swing factor: Q2 is the peak Fresenius benefit quarter, and any shortfall there flows directly to OI.
KPI | Q1 2026 Actual | Q2 2025 Actual (Prior Year) | Q2 2026 Consensus Estimate | YoY Change | FY 2026 Guidance | Consensus vs. Guidance Midpoint |
Adjusted Operating Income ($M) | $482M | $551M | $580M | +5.3% | $2,150–$2,250M (mid: $2,200M) | ~+2.4% vs. mid (annualized run-rate) |
Adjusted EPS (Diluted, Operating) | $2.87 | $2.95 | $3.85 | +30.5% | $14.10–$15.20 (mid: $14.65) | ~+5.1% vs. mid (Q2 implied share) |
Number of Treatments (K) | 7,030K | 7,186K | 7,215K | +0.4% | +25 to +50 bps growth (FY) | Tracking within guidance range |
Revenue Per Treatment (RPT, $) | $417.59 | $404.58 | $414.21 | +2.4% | +1% to +2% YoY (FY) | Consensus slightly below Q1 level; consistent with guided step-down |
Patient Care Cost / Treatment (Operating, $) | $280.10 | $268.29 | $270.97 | +1.0% | Total cost CAGR 1.25–2.25% (FY) | Consensus below Q1 actual; implies continued productivity gains |
Sources: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data
Top KPI 1: Adjusted Operating Income (OI) | Top KPI 2: Adjusted EPS (Diluted, Operating)
Quarter | Adj. OI Reported ($M) | Adj. OI Consensus ($M) | OI Surprise % | Adj. EPS Reported ($) | Adj. EPS Consensus ($) | EPS Surprise % | Result |
Q2 2024 | N/A — not in VA | N/A | N/A | N/A — not in VA | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Q3 2024 | $535M | $538M | -0.6% | $2.59 | $2.72 | -4.8% | Miss |
Q4 2024 | $491M | $470M | +4.5% | $2.24 | $2.16 | +3.7% | Beat |
Q1 2025 | $439M | $440M | -0.3% | $2.00 | $1.95 | +2.6% | In-Line / Slight Beat |
Q2 2025 | $551M | $524M | +5.2% | $2.95 | $2.74 | +7.7% | Beat |
Q3 2025 | $506M | $574M | -11.8% | $2.51 | $3.24 | -22.5% | Miss |
Q4 2025 | $586M | $562M | +4.3% | $3.40 | $3.26 | +4.3% | Beat |
Q1 2026 | $482M | $434M | +11.0% | $2.87 | $2.37 | +21.1% | Large Beat |
Pattern: DVA has beaten on OI in 5 of the last 7 reported quarters, with the two misses (Q3 2024, Q3 2025) driven by timing/seasonality rather than structural deterioration. The Q1 2026 beat was the largest in recent history (+21% EPS surprise), setting a higher bar for Q2. Sources: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data.
Key Takeaway: Guidance was formally raised on May 5 (Q1 earnings) and has not changed since; the May 12 BofA conference confirmed the same numbers with a
Key Takeaway: Guidance was formally raised on May 5 (Q1 earnings) and has not changed since; the May 12 BofA conference confirmed the same numbers with a confident tone. The only open question is whether the ACA headwind tracks below the $40M placeholder, which management flagged as trending slightly better but chose not to formally revise.
Metric | Initial Guidance (Q4 2025 Earnings, Feb 2026) | Revised Guidance | Current Consensus | Note |
Adjusted Operating Income (FY 2026) | $2,110–$2,210M | $2,150–$2,250M | $2,244M | ↑ Raised at Q1 2026 earnings (May 5, 2026); +$40M at midpoint; driven by higher volume and labor efficiencies |
Adjusted EPS (FY 2026) | $13.50–$14.60 | $14.10–$15.20 | $14.88 | ↑ Raised at Q1 2026 earnings (May 5, 2026); consistent with OI raise plus buyback benefit |
Treatment Volume Growth (FY 2026) | Flat (0%) | +25 to +50 bps | Tracking within range | ↑ Raised at Q1 2026 earnings (May 5, 2026); ~half from Fresenius transfers, ~half from better underlying mortality |
Revenue Per Treatment Growth (FY 2026) | +1% to +2% | — (unchanged) | $417.76 FY consensus | Unchanged; ACA headwind ($40M) still embedded; binder ASP decline a 40 bps drag; confirmed at BofA conference May 12 |
ACA / Enhanced Premium Tax Credit Headwind (FY 2026) | ~$40M commercial mix headwind | — (unchanged formally) | N/A — not a consensus line item | Trending slightly better than $40M per Q1 call; management holding placeholder pending greater clarity on effectuation rates |
Total Cost CAGR (FY 2026) | +1.25% to +2.25% | — (unchanged) | Patient care cost/tx consensus: $278.25 FY | Unchanged; labor productivity better than expected in Q1; AI investment a net cost through 2026 |
Key Takeaway: Estimates have been remarkably stable since the post-Q1 reset — Q2 EPS consensus moved from $3.87 to $3.85 in the first week after earnings and has not moved since, suggesting the street is comfortable with the bar but sees limited upside from here. The full-year OI consensus of $2,244M sits near the top of the raised guidance range ($2,150–$2,250M), implying the street is already pricing in a slight beat on the year.
KPI (Period) | Estimate ~5 Days Post Q1 Earnings (May 12, 2026) | Current Consensus (Aug 3, 2026) | Estimate Δ (%) | Initial Guidance (Q4 2025 Earnings) | Current Guidance (Post Q1 Raise) | Guidance Δ | Consensus vs. Current Guidance (%) |
Adj. EPS — Q2 2026 | $3.87 | $3.85 | -0.5% | N/A (quarterly not guided) | N/A (quarterly not guided) | N/A | N/A |
Adj. OI — Q2 2026 ($M) | $583M | $580M | -0.5% | N/A (quarterly not guided) | N/A (quarterly not guided) | N/A | N/A |
Adj. EPS — FY 2026 | $14.96 | $14.88 | -0.5% | $13.50–$14.60 (mid: $14.05) | $14.10–$15.20 (mid: $14.65) | +4.3% at midpoint | +1.6% above raised midpoint |
Adj. OI — FY 2026 ($M) | $2,254M | $2,244M | -0.4% | $2,110–$2,210M (mid: $2,160M) | $2,150–$2,250M (mid: $2,200M) | +1.9% at midpoint | +2.0% above raised midpoint |
Estimates have been essentially frozen since the post-Q1 reset, with both Q2 and FY consensus drifting only ~50 bps lower in the 12 weeks since earnings — a sign of high conviction in the current bar rather than creeping skepticism. The full-year OI consensus of $2,244M sits near the top of the raised guidance range, implying the street is already embedding a modest beat on the year; any Q2 shortfall would therefore require a meaningful H2 acceleration to hold the full-year number. Sources: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data.
Key Takeaway: The DVA re-rating since Q1 earnings has been almost entirely
Key Takeaway: The DVA re-rating since Q1 earnings has been almost entirely
Key Takeaway: The DVA re-rating since Q1 earnings has been almost entirely multiple expansion (+40% P/E expansion over 3 months), not estimate revisions — the stock has outperformed XLV by ~40 percentage points since May 5, meaning the bar for Q2 to sustain the move is high and the stock is now pricing in execution, not just optionality.
DVA closed at $157.04 on May 5, 2026 (Q1 earnings day), and reached $240.09 by July 31, 2026 — a gain of +52.9% in approximately 60 trading days. Over the same period, XLV (Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF, the appropriate sector benchmark for a large-cap healthcare services company) gained approximately +11.9%, and the S&P 500 (SPY) gained approximately +3.2%. DVA's outperformance vs. XLV of ~41 percentage points is almost entirely attributable to multiple expansion: the NTM P/E expanded from ~8.2x at the time of Q1 earnings to ~14.7x currently, while NTM EPS estimates moved only modestly. The stock briefly pulled back in mid-May (to ~$192) and again in early June (to ~$188) before resuming its uptrend, with the June–July leg driven by continued momentum and the Berkshire/Weschler portfolio narrative. The stock is now trading near its 52-week high and at a meaningful premium to its historical average multiple, making Q2 execution critical to sustaining the valuation.
Sector ETF used: XLV (Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF) — appropriate for DVA as a large-cap US healthcare services/dialysis provider. Source: Stock Price Data (Yahoo Finance).
Date | DVA (Indexed) | XLV (Indexed) | SPY (Indexed) |
May 5, 2026 (Base) | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
May 6, 2026 | 123.5 | 100.1 | 101.4 |
May 15, 2026 | 127.2 | 99.9 | 102.1 |
Jun 1, 2026 | 120.9 | 101.7 | 104.8 |
Jun 15, 2026 | 133.6 | 105.2 | 104.3 |
Jun 30, 2026 | 141.7 | 109.2 | 103.2 |
Jul 15, 2026 | 147.5 | 108.9 | 104.3 |
Jul 31, 2026 | 152.9 | 111.9 | 103.2 |
Note: Indexed to 100 at May 5, 2026 close. Data through July 31, 2026 only. DVA +52.9%, XLV +11.9%, SPY +3.2% over the period. Source: Stock Price Data (Yahoo Finance).
Key Takeaway: The most important post-Q1 development is the
Key Takeaway: The most important post-Q1 development is the confirmation that Fresenius clinic closures are proceeding on schedule (largely complete by end of Q2), which is the primary incremental volume driver for Q2 and the key upside catalyst heading into the print. No guidance changes or negative surprises have emerged since May 5.
Key Takeaway: The most direct read-through comes from
Key Takeaway: The most direct read-through comes from Fresenius Medical Care (FMS), which reported Q2 2026 results today (August 3) and confirmed its full-year 2026 outlook unchanged, with Care Delivery OI up 23% at constant currency — a strong positive signal for dialysis industry economics. Broader healthcare peers (DGX, LH, UHS) provide useful context on ACA/payer-mix trends and US healthcare utilization, but are less directly comparable to DVA’s dialysis-specific dynamics.
Note on scope: Only commentary about the current reporting quarter (Q2 2026) or forward-looking commentary made after Q1 2025 earnings is included below. Backward-looking Q1 2025 results commentary from peers is excluded.
Relevance: HIGHEST — Direct dialysis peer, same calendar quarter.
Relevance: MODERATE — Broader healthcare services; kidney testing partnership with FMS; ACA/payer-mix read-through.
Relevance: MODERATE — Broader healthcare services; ACA/payer-mix and utilization read-through.
Relevance: LIMITED — Acute care hospital operator; ACA/payer-mix and labor cost read-through only.
Key Takeaway: The insider picture is dominated by
Key Takeaway: The insider picture is dominated by post-earnings open-market sales by the CEO and CFO at prices well below current levels (~$193–$211 vs. ~$240 today), which is notable but not alarming given the post-blackout timing. The Berkshire sale was contractual (pre-existing repurchase agreement). No open-market buys have been filed since Q1 earnings.
Name | Title | Transaction Type | Shares | Date | Note |
Rodriguez, Javier | CEO & Director | Open Market Sale | 30,000 shares | Jun 15, 2026 | Discretionary; no 10b5-1 plan flagged; sold at ~$208–$211; 6 weeks post-Q1 earnings (post-blackout window) |
Rodriguez, Javier | CEO & Director | Open Market Sale | 39,407 shares | Jun 16, 2026 | Discretionary; no 10b5-1 plan flagged; sold at ~$208–$211; consecutive-day sale with Jun 15 transaction |
Waters, Kathleen Alyce | Chief Legal & Public Affairs Officer | 10b5-1 Planned Sale | 15,405 shares | Jun 15, 2026 | Pre-planned 10b5-1 sale; obligation-driven; not a discretionary signal |
Maughan, David Paul | Chief Operating Officer, DKC | Open Market Sale | 7,073 shares | May 11, 2026 | Discretionary; no 10b5-1 plan flagged; sold at ~$199; 6 days post-Q1 earnings |
Maughan, David Paul | Chief Operating Officer, DKC | Open Market Sale | 13,456 shares | May 12, 2026 | Discretionary; no 10b5-1 plan flagged; sold at ~$200; consecutive-day sale with May 11 transaction |
Ackerman, Joel | CFO & Treasurer | Open Market Sale | 51,471 shares | May 7, 2026 | Discretionary; no 10b5-1 plan flagged; largest single insider sale in the period; sold at ~$193–$199; 2 days post-Q1 earnings |
Hearty, James O. | Chief Compliance Officer | 10b5-1 Planned Sale | 2,184 shares | May 6, 2026 | Pre-planned 10b5-1 sale; obligation-driven; not a discretionary signal |
Buffett, Warren E. (Berkshire Hathaway) | 10% Owner | Open Market Sale (Contractual) | 1,220,376 shares | May 1, 2026 | Pursuant to DVA’s pre-existing share repurchase agreement with Berkshire; contractual/planned, not a discretionary sell signal; Berkshire retains ~28.9M shares |
Analysis: The cluster of discretionary open-market sales by the CEO (69,407 shares combined), CFO (51,471 shares), and COO (20,529 shares) in the days and weeks immediately following Q1 earnings is worth flagging. All three sold at prices in the $193–$211 range — well below the current ~$240 level — suggesting they did not anticipate the subsequent 15–20% additional appreciation. This is not unusual behavior for executives selling in the post-blackout window after a large earnings beat, but the concentration of discretionary sales (vs. 10b5-1 planned sales) across three senior executives in a short window is notable. The Berkshire sale is contractual and should not be read as a negative signal. No open-market buys have been filed by any insider since Q1 earnings. Source: Insider Transaction Data (SEC Form 4 Filings).