PEG — Q2 2026 Earnings Preview

Company

Public Service Enterprise Group (PEG)

Reporting Quarter

Q2 2026 (period ending June 30, 2026)

Earnings Call

August 4, 2026 — 11:00 AM ET

Prepared

August 4, 2026 (pre-market; data cutoff August 3, 2026)

Last Earnings

May 5, 2026 (Q1 2026)

Disclaimer

This preview is prepared strictly on pre-market information available through August 3, 2026. No Q2 2026 results disclosed on or after August 4, 2026 are incorporated.

1. Earnings Preview

Key Takeaway: The setup into Q2 2026 is a low bar with modest downside risk — consensus Non-GAAP Operating EPS has been cut ~11% since the Q1 print to ~$0.79, the stock trades at a ~4% discount to regulated utility peers on NTM P/E, and the single biggest swing factor is nuclear fleet performance and any updated PJM/New Jersey policy commentary.

PSEG heads into Q2 2026 with a meaningfully reduced consensus bar — Non-GAAP Operating EPS estimates have been cut from ~$0.89 at the time of the Q1 print to ~$0.79 today, a decline of roughly 11%, driven by the absence of the Zero Emission Certificate (ZEC) program (which concluded in May 2025) and the seasonal nature of Q2 as a shoulder quarter for both gas volumes and nuclear capacity revenues. Management maintained full-year 2026 Non-GAAP Operating EPS guidance of $4.28–$4.40 on the Q1 call and reaffirmed a 6–8% CAGR through 2030, a posture that has not shifted since — no 8-K guidance revision, no conference update, and the July 1 investor materials posting contained no new financial guidance. Estimate revisions have tracked the guidance midpoint lower, suggesting the street is not building in meaningful cushion above the low end of the range. The stock has underperformed the utility sector over the past 12 months (down ~15% vs. the sector), with multiple compression accounting for the bulk of the move — NTM P/E has contracted ~20% year-over-year to ~16.8x, a ~4% discount to the regulated utility peer group. The key wildcard heading into the print is nuclear fleet performance (capacity factor and any unplanned outages at Salem or Hope Creek during Q2) and any updated commentary on the PJM Reliability Backstop Auction (RBA) process and the New Jersey Nuclear Task Force — both of which could shift the long-term earnings narrative materially even if the Q2 print itself is in-line.

2. KPIs & Consensus Expectations

Key Takeaway: Consensus is a low bar heading into Q2 — Non-GAAP Operating EPS of ~$0.79 implies a ~3% YoY decline and sits well below Q1’s $1.56 beat. The bigger swing factor is nuclear capacity factor and Power segment margins, which are harder to model and drove the Q1 outperformance.

Table 1 — Current Quarter Snapshot (Q2 2026)

KPI

Q1 2026 Actual (Last Quarter)

Q2 2025 Actual (Prior Year Period)

Q2 2026 Consensus Estimate

YoY Change

FY 2026 Guidance

Consensus vs. Guidance Midpoint

Non-GAAP Operating EPS (Diluted)

$1.556

$0.768

$0.795

+3.5% YoY

$4.28–$4.40 (midpoint $4.34)

Full-year consensus $4.38 vs. midpoint $4.34 (+0.9%)

Total Revenue

$4,195M

$2,783M

$2,326M (consensus)

-16.4% YoY

No quarterly revenue guidance provided

N/A — no quarterly guidance

PSE&G Ending Rate Base

$35.8B (Q1 2026 actual)

$34.5B (Q2 2025 actual)

$36.2B (consensus)

+4.9% YoY

6–7.5% CAGR through 2030 from ~$36B YE 2025 base

Tracking in-line with guidance trajectory

Capital Expenditure (Total)

$693M (Q1 2026 actual)

$787M (Q2 2025 actual)

$1,113M (consensus)

+41.4% YoY

~$4.2B full-year 2026 plan (PSE&G)

FY consensus $4.52B vs. plan ~$4.2B (+7.6%)

Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data. All figures sourced from Visible Alpha; Q2 2026 consensus as of August 3, 2026. Revenue consensus reflects analyst estimates; note that Visible Alpha revenue consensus for Q2 2026 is $2,326M. Rate base and capex consensus from Visible Alpha. FY 2026 guidance from Q1 2026 earnings call (May 5, 2026). YoY change for revenue reflects the seasonal pattern of Q2 being a lower-revenue quarter vs. Q1 (winter heating season). Non-GAAP Operating EPS YoY of +3.5% reflects Q2 2025 actual of $0.768 vs. Q2 2026 consensus of $0.795.

Table 2 — Beat/Miss History: Non-GAAP Operating EPS (Last 8 Quarters)

Quarter

Reported EPS

Consensus at Print

Surprise %

Result

Q1 2026

$1.556

$1.413

+10.1%

Beat

Q4 2025

$0.724

$0.642

+12.8%

Beat

Q3 2025

$1.134

$1.008

+12.5%

Beat

Q2 2025

$0.768

$0.690

+11.3%

Beat

Q1 2025

$1.428

$1.437

-0.6%

Miss

Q4 2024

$0.837

$0.774

+8.1%

Beat

Q3 2024

$0.897

$0.894

+0.3%

Slight Beat

Q2 2024

N/A — not in VA for this period

N/A

N/A

N/A

Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data. Consensus at print reflects the as-of consensus from Visible Alpha for each respective quarter. Pattern: PEG has beaten Non-GAAP Operating EPS consensus in 6 of the last 7 reported quarters, with an average beat of ~7–8% — the one miss (Q1 2025) was marginal at -0.6%. The consistent beat pattern is driven primarily by stronger-than-expected nuclear performance and O&M discipline, suggesting the current ~$0.79 consensus for Q2 2026 may again prove conservative if the nuclear fleet ran cleanly through the quarter.

3. Guidance & Commentary Evolution

Key Takeaway: Guidance has been unchanged since the May 5 Q1 2026 earnings call — no post-earnings 8-K, conference, or investor day has revised the $4.28–$4.40 FY 2026 range or the 6–8% CAGR through 2030. Management tone on the Q1 call was confident and forward-leaning, particularly on nuclear and the New Jersey policy backdrop.

Metric

Initial Guidance (Q1 2026 Earnings Call, May 5, 2026)

Revised Guidance

Current Consensus

Note

FY 2026 Non-GAAP Operating EPS

$4.28–$4.40 per share

Unchanged

$4.38 (Visible Alpha)

No post-earnings revision. Consensus sits near the top of the range, implying the street expects delivery at the high end.

Non-GAAP Operating EPS CAGR (through 2030)

6–8% CAGR reaffirmed

Unchanged

FY 2027 consensus $4.67 (+6.6% vs. FY 2026 consensus)

Tracking within the 6–8% CAGR band. Incremental upside from nuclear revenue opportunities, competitive transmission wins, or new solar/storage connections noted as not included in base CAGR.

PSE&G FY 2026 Capital Spending Plan

~$4.2B for PSE&G; $24–$28B 5-year plan (2026–2030)

Unchanged

FY 2026 capex consensus $4.52B (Visible Alpha)

Consensus slightly above the $4.2B PSE&G plan, likely reflecting PSEG Power capex. No revision since Q1 call.

Rate Base CAGR (PSE&G, through 2030)

6–7.5% CAGR from ~$36B YE 2025 base

Unchanged

Q2 2026 rate base consensus $36.2B (Visible Alpha)

Tracking in-line with the 6–7.5% CAGR trajectory.

Electric Rates (2026)

Flat in 2026 (coordinated with Governor’s office and BPU)

Unchanged

N/A

BGS auction results lowered residential electric supply costs by 1.8% effective June 1, 2026. Consistent with affordability posture.

Source: Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript (May 5, 2026); Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data. No post-earnings guidance revision events (8-K, conference, investor day) were identified between May 5 and August 3, 2026. The July 1, 2026 8-K (investor materials posting) contained no new financial guidance.

4. Guidance vs. Estimate Revision Tracker

Key Takeaway: Estimates for Q2 2026 have been cut ~10% since the Q1 print (from ~$0.89 to ~$0.79), while FY 2026 estimates have held near the top of guidance. The gap between the Q2 estimate cut and the stable FY estimate suggests the street is back-half loading the year — a pattern consistent with management’s own Q1 commentary that Q1 was above seasonal norms and summer performance is the key variable.

KPI (Period)

Estimate ~5 Days Post Q1 Earnings (c. May 12, 2026)

Current Consensus (Aug 3, 2026)

Estimate Δ (%)

Initial Guidance (Q1 Call, May 5)

Current Guidance

Guidance Δ

Consensus vs. Guidance Midpoint

Non-GAAP Operating EPS — Q2 2026

$0.887

$0.795

-10.4%

No quarterly guidance provided

No quarterly guidance

N/A

N/A

Non-GAAP Operating EPS — FY 2026

$4.434

$4.384

-1.1%

$4.28–$4.40 (midpoint $4.34)

$4.28–$4.40 (unchanged)

Unchanged

+1.0% above midpoint

Non-GAAP Operating EPS — FY 2027

$4.721

$4.674

-1.0%

6–8% CAGR through 2030

6–8% CAGR (unchanged)

Unchanged

Implies ~6.6% growth vs. FY 2026 consensus — within the 6–8% band

PSE&G Rate Base — Q2 2026

$32.5B (as of May 12, 2026 snapshot)

$36.2B (current)

+11.4%

6–7.5% CAGR from ~$36B YE 2025 base

Unchanged

Unchanged

Tracking in-line with guidance trajectory

Capital Expenditure — FY 2026

$4.253B

$4.518B

+6.2%

~$4.2B (PSE&G plan)

Unchanged

Unchanged

Consensus above plan; likely reflects PSEG Power capex in addition to PSE&G

Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data. Post-Q1 baseline (May 12, 2026) reflects consensus approximately 5 trading days after the May 5, 2026 earnings release. Current consensus as of August 3, 2026. Rate base as-of snapshot reflects the Visible Alpha consensus as of May 12, 2026 for Q2 2026 period.

The ~10% cut to Q2 EPS estimates since the Q1 print is the most notable revision — it reflects the market’s recognition that Q1 benefited from an unusually harsh winter (above-seasonal gas volumes and capacity revenues) that will not repeat in Q2. FY 2026 estimates have barely moved (-1.1%), implying the street is simply redistributing the Q1 beat into the back half of the year rather than raising the full-year bar. This creates a setup where a Q2 in-line print is unlikely to move the stock materially, but any guidance raise or positive nuclear/policy commentary could be the catalyst.

5. Stock Performance & Valuation

Key Takeaway: The ~15% 12-month underperformance is almost entirely multiple compression (-20% on NTM P/E, -13% on EV/EBITDA) rather than estimate cuts, suggesting the market has re-rated PEG’s growth premium lower — likely reflecting the leveling-off of the data center pipeline and the absence of a near-term nuclear monetization catalyst. PEG now trades at a ~4% discount to regulated utility peers on NTM P/E (16.8x vs. peer mean ~17.6x), the widest discount in three years.

Valuation vs. Peers (NTM P/E, as of August 3, 2026)

Metric

PEG

Peer Group Mean (Reg. Electric Utilities)

PEG Premium / (Discount)

NTM P/E

16.8x

~17.6x (implied from peer data)

-4.3% discount

NTM EV/EBITDA

12.2x

N/A — peer aggregate not computed

N/A

P/Book

2.09x

N/A

N/A

NTM P/E Δ (3-month)

-6.2%

Peer avg. ~-5% to -8%

In-line with sector de-rating

NTM P/E Δ (12-month)

-20.0%

Peer avg. ~-5% to -10%

Significant underperformance vs. peers

Source: Stock performance decomposition data as of August 3, 2026; peer valuation data from peer_valuation_tool (Regulated Electric Utilities peer group). PEG’s 12-month price return of -14.65% is decomposed as follows: NTM P/E multiple contracted -20.0% (from ~21.0x to ~16.8x), while NTM EPS estimates moved modestly, indicating multiple compression is the dominant driver of underperformance. The 3-month price return of -6.1% is similarly multiple-driven (-6.2% on P/E, -5.7% on EV/EBITDA).

Stock Performance Since Last Earnings (May 5, 2026 – August 3, 2026): PEG has declined approximately 6% since the Q1 2026 earnings date, underperforming the S&P 500 and broadly in-line with the utility sector (XLU/UTY). Key events during the period include: (1) the July 1, 2026 investor materials update (no new guidance); (2) the June 3, 2026 $500M senior notes offering at 4.800% due 2031; and (3) the broader utility sector de-rating driven by rising rate concerns and affordability headwinds. The stock has not re-rated higher despite the April 2026 New Jersey nuclear moratorium lift, suggesting the market is waiting for concrete new nuclear development milestones before assigning value.

6. Material News & Developments (Since May 5, 2026)

Key Takeaway: The most important development since Q1 earnings is the New Jersey nuclear moratorium lift (April 2026) and PSEG’s active engagement with the NJ Nuclear Task Force — a structural positive for the long-term earnings narrative that the market has not yet priced. Near-term, the PJM Reliability Backstop Auction (RBA) process and the FERC capacity price collar extension are the most actionable regulatory catalysts for the Q2 call.

7. Insider Transaction Activity (Since May 5, 2026)

Key Takeaway: SEC Form 4 searches for PEG between May 5 and August 3, 2026 returned 14 filings, all of which appear to be routine RSU/equity award-related transactions (grant/vesting activity) rather than discretionary open-market buys or sells. No notable open-market purchases or discretionary sales were identified — the absence of insider buying at a 12-month low is worth noting but is not unusual for a regulated utility where management compensation is heavily equity-based and trading windows are restricted.

Name

Title

Transaction Type

Value

Date

Note

Multiple insiders (14 Form 4 filings)

Various

Equity award / RSU vesting (non-open-market)

Various

May–Aug 2026

All 14 Form 4 filings identified appear to be grant/vesting activity, not discretionary open-market transactions. No open-market buys (Code P) or discretionary sells (Code S) identified in the search window.

Source: SEC EDGAR Form 4 filings for PEG (CIK 788784), May 5 – August 3, 2026. 14 filings returned; all appear to be equity compensation-related (RSU grants/vestings). No open-market buys (Form 4 Code P) or discretionary open-market sells (Code S) were identified. Form 144 filings were not separately searched. The absence of open-market buying at a 12-month low is not unusual for a regulated utility with restricted trading windows and equity-heavy compensation structures.

8. Peer Commentary Read-Through (Last 60 Days)

Key Takeaway: Peers reporting Q2 2026 results in late July 2026 provide a broadly constructive read-through for PEG — regulated utility earnings are tracking at or above guidance, data center demand remains robust across PJM-adjacent territories, and the PJM capacity market is showing acute scarcity signals that support PSEG’s advocacy for new dispatchable generation. The most direct NJ/PJM read-throughs come from Exelon (EXC) and FirstEnergy (FE); others are indirect but thematically relevant.

Methodology Note: Only forward-looking commentary about Q3 2026 (the current unreported quarter for PEG) or the broader 2026 outlook made during Q2 2026 earnings calls (reported July 24 – July 31, 2026) is included below. Q2 2026 results commentary (backward-looking) is excluded. Each item is tagged for geographic relevance to New Jersey/PJM.

Exelon (EXC) — Q2 2026 Earnings Call (July 30, 2026)

Geographic Relevance: DIRECT — Exelon operates Atlantic City Electric (ACE) in New Jersey and is a major PJM participant.

FirstEnergy (FE) — Q2 2026 Earnings Call (July 29, 2026)

Geographic Relevance: DIRECT — FirstEnergy operates Jersey Central Power & Light (JCP&L) in New Jersey and is a major PJM participant.

Entergy (ETR) — Q2 2026 Earnings Call (July 29, 2026)

Geographic Relevance: INDIRECT — Entergy operates in the South/MISO/ERCOT footprint, not PJM or NJ. Read-through is thematic (data center demand, regulatory frameworks, nuclear).

American Electric Power (AEP) — Q2 2026 Earnings Call (July 30, 2026)

Geographic Relevance: INDIRECT — AEP operates primarily in Ohio, Texas, and other non-NJ PJM states. Read-through is thematic (data center demand, PJM dynamics, capex).

Southern Company (SO) — Q2 2026 Earnings Call (July 30, 2026)

Geographic Relevance: INDIRECT — Southern operates in the Southeast (Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi). Read-through is thematic (data center contracting, nuclear, regulatory frameworks).

DTE Energy (DTE) — Q2 2026 Earnings Call (July 28, 2026)

Geographic Relevance: INDIRECT — DTE operates in Michigan (MISO). Read-through is thematic (data center contracting, regulatory cost recovery, capex execution).

NextEra Energy (NEE) — Q2 2026 Earnings Call (July 24, 2026)

Geographic Relevance: INDIRECT (with PJM-specific elements) — NEE operates primarily in Florida and through its renewables arm nationally, including PJM states. The proposed Dominion merger adds Virginia/PJM relevance.

Dominion Energy (D) — Q2 2026 Earnings Call (July 31, 2026)

Geographic Relevance: INDIRECT (with PJM-specific elements) — Dominion operates in Virginia (PJM), the world’s largest data center market. The July 22 PJM grid disturbance originated in Dominion’s territory.

Peer Commentary Summary Table

Peer

Call Date

NJ/PJM Relevance

Key Q3 2026 / Forward Read-Through for PEG

Signal

EXC (Exelon)

Jul 30

DIRECT (ACE in NJ; PJM)

PJM capacity shortfall 6.8 GW; record 168 GW demand in July; ACE $1B NJ battery storage project; data center queue refined to 36 GW (speculative removed); FY guidance reaffirmed

Positive

FE (FirstEnergy)

Jul 29

DIRECT (JCP&L in NJ; PJM)

NJ base rate case filing imminent in Q3 2026; constructive BPU engagement; data center pipeline +30% to 25 GW; PJM Open Window participation

Positive

ETR (Entergy)

Jul 29

INDIRECT (South/MISO)

7–12 GW hyperscale pipeline; tighter power market; FY guidance affirmed; on track for high end

Positive

AEP

Jul 30

INDIRECT (Ohio/TX PJM)

FY guidance raised; 69 GW contracted load; PJM engagement intensifying; new 5-year capex plan at Q3 call

Positive

SO (Southern)

Jul 30

INDIRECT (Southeast)

FY guidance raised to top of range; data center usage +55% YoY; new nuclear discussions with hyperscalers on cost overrun risk

Positive

DTE

Jul 28

INDIRECT (Michigan/MISO)

Tracking to high end of 2026 guidance; 6–8% CAGR confidence; Oracle 1.4 GW on track; Google 1 GW contract advancing; July storm validates grid investment

Positive

NEE (NextEra)

Jul 24

INDIRECT (FL/national; PJM PA)

FERC Section 206 orders on large load cost allocation; 9.5 GW gas development in TX/PA; Q2 beat; 35.1 GW renewables backlog

Positive

D (Dominion)

Jul 31

INDIRECT (VA/PJM)

53.8 GW data center contracted in VA; PJM grid disturbance (Jul 22) from VA load; Q2 beat +16% vs. consensus

Positive

Overall Peer Read-Through Assessment: The peer commentary from Q2 2026 earnings calls is uniformly constructive for PEG’s Q3 2026 and full-year 2026 outlook. The most actionable signals are: (1) the PJM capacity scarcity is worsening (EXC), directly supporting PSEG’s nuclear fleet value and RBA advocacy; (2) the NJ regulatory environment is open to constructive rate case filings (FE), positive for PSE&G’s future cost recovery; and (3) the new nuclear hyperscaler cost-sharing model is being actively discussed across the sector (SO), validating PSEG’s Salem new nuclear strategy. The absence of any negative read-throughs from PJM-adjacent peers is notable — the sector is broadly beating estimates and raising guidance, which sets a positive backdrop for PEG’s Q2 print even if the quarter itself is seasonally weak.

Sources: Entergy Q2 2026 Earnings Call Transcript (July 29, 2026); AEP Q2 2026 Earnings Call Transcript (July 30, 2026); Exelon Q2 2026 Earnings Call Transcript (July 30, 2026); Southern Company Q2 2026 Earnings Call Transcript (July 30, 2026); DTE Energy Q2 2026 Earnings Call Transcript (July 28, 2026); NextEra Energy Q2 2026 Earnings Call Transcript (July 24, 2026); Dominion Energy Q2 2026 Earnings Call Transcript (July 31, 2026); FirstEnergy Q2 2026 Earnings Call Transcript (July 29, 2026). News digest items sourced from Implied daily news feed (July–August 2026).