Qnity Electronics (Q) — Q2 2026 Earnings Preview

Company

Qnity Electronics, Inc.

Ticker

NYSE: Q

Reporting Period

Q2 2026 (quarter ending June 30, 2026)

Earnings Date

August 4, 2026 (pre-market)

Prepared

August 3, 2026

Earnings Preview

Key Takeaway: Setup leans toward a beat — consensus is a manageable bar after the Q1 raise, and peer commentary from Lam Research, KLA, and Teradyne all point to an accelerating semiconductor demand environment in Q2; the biggest swing factor is whether ICS advanced packaging momentum sustained its 50%+ YoY growth pace.

Heading into Q2 2026 results, the bar for Qnity is firm but not stretched: consensus revenue of ~$1.364B implies mid-single-digit sequential growth, exactly in line with management's own guide of "normal seasonal increase in the mid-single digits," leaving limited room for a miss but also a clear path to a beat if ICS continues to outperform.

Management's tone since the May 12 Q1 print has been consistently constructive — at the June 16 Wolfe Research conference, CEO Jon Kemp reiterated a "great start to the year" driven by a "surge in AI-led demand" and confirmed mainstream logic utilization has moved from the mid-70s to the upper-70s/low-80s range, a meaningful sequential improvement.

Estimate revisions have tracked guidance closely: the Q2 2026 consensus revenue estimate moved from ~$1.361B (as of May 19) to ~$1.364B currently, a negligible drift that suggests the Street has largely digested the Q1 raise without adding incremental optimism — a setup that historically favors upside surprises for companies with strong order books.

The stock has given back roughly 21% from its post-Q1 peak of ~$175 to ~$133 today, driven entirely by multiple compression (EV/EBITDA contracted from ~20.7x to ~17.5x) rather than estimate cuts, which means the stock is not pricing in a beat and any positive surprise could re-rate the multiple.

The key wildcard is the pace of ICS advanced packaging revenue — if the 50%+ YoY growth rate in advanced packaging and thermal management sustained through Q2 (as suggested by KLA's >70% advanced packaging revenue growth and Lam's >70% YoY advanced packaging growth), Qnity's ICS segment could again outperform its high-single-digit sequential guide, driving a consolidated beat similar to Q1.

KPIs & Consensus Expectations

Key Takeaway: Consensus is a manageable bar — revenue and EBITDA estimates are essentially in line with management's own Q2 guide, leaving room for upside if ICS advanced packaging sustains its Q1 momentum. Adjusted EPS is the bigger swing factor given operating leverage sensitivity.

Table 1 — Q2 2026 Current Quarter Snapshot

KPI

Q1 2026 Actual

Q2 2025 Actual (Prior Year)

Q2 2026 Consensus Estimate

YoY Change

Q2 2026 Guidance (Mgmt)

Consensus vs. Guidance Midpoint

Total Revenue ($M)

$1,315

$1,170

$1,364

+16.6%

Mid-single-digit sequential growth from Q1 ($1,315M base → ~$1,356–1,384M implied)

~+0.6% above implied midpoint

Adj. Operating EBITDA ($M)

$411

$354

$417

+17.8%

Segment margins: Semi mid-30s%, ICS mid-to-high 20s%

N/A — no explicit EBITDA $ guide for Q2

Adj. EBITDA Margin (%)

31.3%

30.3%

30.6%

+30 bps YoY

Semi mid-30s%; ICS mid-to-high 20s%

N/A — no explicit blended margin guide

Adj. EPS - Diluted ($)

$1.08

$0.76

$1.07

+40.8%

No explicit Q2 EPS guide

N/A — no explicit Q2 EPS guide

Revenue — Semiconductor ($M)

$722

$644

$722

+12.1%

Roughly flat sequentially

~0% vs. guide midpoint

Revenue — ICS ($M)

$593

$526

$641

+21.9%

High-single-digit sequential growth

~+8.1% sequential vs. guide of high-single-digits — in line

Adj. EBITDA Margin — Semi (%)

36.4%

35.1%

35.4%

-100 bps YoY

Mid-30s%

In line with guide

Adj. EBITDA Margin — ICS (%)

28.5%

24.7%

28.0%

+330 bps YoY

Mid-to-high 20s%

In line with guide

Free Cash Flow ($M)

$28

$223

$100

-55.2%

FY2026: $500–$600M (full year guide)

N/A — no explicit Q2 FCF guide

Sources: All consensus estimates from Visible Alpha. Actuals from Visible Alpha and Q1 2026 Earnings Release (May 12, 2026). Q2 2026 guidance from Q1 2026 Earnings Call transcript (May 12, 2026). Note: Q2 2025 EBITDA actual of $354M and margin of 30.3% derived from Visible Alpha actuals.

Table 2 — Beat/Miss History (Last 8 Quarters, Top 2 KPIs: Total Revenue & Adj. Operating EBITDA)

Quarter

KPI

Reported

Consensus

Surprise %

Result

Q1 2026

Revenue ($M)

$1,315

$1,271

+3.5%

Beat

Q1 2026

Adj. EBITDA ($M)

$411

$377

+9.0%

Beat

Q4 2025

Revenue ($M)

$1,190

$1,152

+3.3%

Beat

Q4 2025

Adj. EBITDA ($M)

$349

$346

+0.9%

Beat

Q3 2025

Revenue ($M)

$1,276

$1,185

+7.7%

Beat

Q3 2025

Adj. EBITDA ($M)

$370

$339

+9.1%

Beat

Q2 2025

Revenue ($M)

$1,170

N/A — pre-spin

N/A

N/A — pre-spin

Q2 2025

Adj. EBITDA ($M)

$354

N/A — pre-spin

N/A

N/A — pre-spin

Q1 2025

Revenue ($M)

$1,118

N/A — pre-spin

N/A

N/A — pre-spin

Q4 2024

Revenue ($M)

$1,101

N/A — pre-spin

N/A

N/A — pre-spin

Pattern: Qnity has beaten consensus on both revenue and EBITDA in every quarter since its November 2025 spin-off (Q3 2025, Q4 2025, Q1 2026), with EBITDA beats consistently larger than revenue beats, suggesting strong operating leverage. Pre-spin quarters lack standalone consensus data.

Source: Visible Alpha consensus and actuals data.

Guidance & Commentary Evolution

Key Takeaway: Management raised full-year guidance across all metrics at Q1 earnings (May 12) and reiterated a constructive tone at the Wolfe Research conference (June 16) — no further formal guidance changes since Q1, but qualitative commentary has been incrementally positive on mainstream logic recovery and ICS capacity.

Metric

Initial Guidance (Q4 2025 Earnings, Feb 2026)

Revised Guidance (Q1 2026 Earnings, May 12, 2026)

Current Consensus

Note

FY2026 Net Sales ($B)

$5.0–$5.2B

$5.225–$5.375B (+5% at midpoint)

$5.415B

↑ Raised at Q1 2026 earnings; driven by strong ICS beat and upgraded MSI outlook. Consensus sits above raised midpoint of $5.30B.

FY2026 Adj. Operating EBITDA ($B)

$1.475–$1.565B

$1.535–$1.625B (+4% at midpoint)

$1.631B

↑ Raised at Q1 2026 earnings; consensus above raised midpoint of $1.580B, implying Street expects further upside.

FY2026 Adj. EPS

$3.55–$3.95

$3.80–$4.14 (+6% at midpoint)

$4.18

↑ Raised at Q1 2026 earnings; consensus of $4.18 above raised midpoint of $3.97, suggesting Street is modeling above the top of the range.

FY2026 Adj. Free Cash Flow ($M)

$455–$545M

$500–$600M (+10% at midpoint)

$479M

↑ Raised at Q1 2026 earnings; consensus below raised midpoint of $550M, reflecting elevated CapEx (~9% of sales) uncertainty.

FY2026 MSI Wafer Start Growth

Mid-single digits

Mid-to-high single digits

N/A — not in VA

↑ Upgraded at Q1 2026 earnings; management noted "room to do even better" if conditions improve. Wolfe conference (Jun 16) reiterated steady improvement in mainstream logic utilization.

Q2 2026 Revenue (Sequential Growth)

N/A — not guided at Q4

Mid-single-digit sequential growth

$1,364M (+3.7% seq.)

Consensus in line with guide. Semi roughly flat; ICS high-single-digit sequential growth.

Q2 2026 Semi Margin

N/A

Mid-30s%

35.4%

Consensus in line with guide.

Q2 2026 ICS Margin

N/A

Mid-to-high 20s%

28.0%

Consensus in line with guide; Q1 actual of 28.5% was a record, suggesting potential for continued upside.

Sources: Initial guidance from Q4 2025 Earnings Release (Feb 2026). Revised guidance from Q1 2026 Earnings Call transcript (May 12, 2026) and Q1 2026 Earnings Release. Wolfe Research conference commentary (June 16, 2026). Consensus from Visible Alpha.

Guidance vs. Estimate Revision Tracker

Key Takeaway: Estimates have tracked guidance closely since the Q1 raise, with consensus for both Q2 2026 and FY2026 sitting modestly above the raised guidance midpoints — a constructive setup that implies the Street is already modeling slight outperformance, but not aggressively so. The gap is a cushion, not a risk.

KPI (Period)

Estimate ~5 Days Post Q1 Earnings (as of May 19, 2026)

Current Consensus (Aug 3, 2026)

Estimate Δ (%)

Initial Guidance (Q4 2025 Earnings)

Current Guidance (Q1 2026 Earnings)

Guidance Δ

Consensus vs. Current Guidance Midpoint

Total Revenue — Q2 2026

$1,361M

$1,364M

+0.2%

N/A (no Q2 guide at Q4)

Mid-single-digit seq. growth (~$1,356–1,384M implied)

N/A

~+0.6% above implied midpoint

Adj. Operating EBITDA — Q2 2026

$414M

$417M

+0.6%

N/A

No explicit Q2 EBITDA $ guide

N/A

N/A

Adj. EPS — Q2 2026

$1.061

$1.074

+1.2%

N/A

No explicit Q2 EPS guide

N/A

N/A

Total Revenue — FY2026

$5,377M

$5,415M

+0.7%

$5.0–$5.2B (midpoint $5.1B)

$5.225–$5.375B (midpoint $5.30B)

+3.9% at midpoint

+2.2% above raised midpoint

Adj. Operating EBITDA — FY2026

$1,612M

$1,631M

+1.2%

$1.475–$1.565B (midpoint $1.52B)

$1.535–$1.625B (midpoint $1.58B)

+3.9% at midpoint

+3.2% above raised midpoint

Adj. EPS — FY2026

$4.108

$4.184

+1.9%

$3.55–$3.95 (midpoint $3.75)

$3.80–$4.14 (midpoint $3.97)

+5.9% at midpoint

+5.4% above raised midpoint

Estimates have been remarkably stable since the Q1 raise, drifting only +0.2% to +1.9% higher across all KPIs — suggesting the Street has absorbed the guidance raise without adding speculative premium. The FY2026 consensus sitting 2–5% above the raised guidance midpoints reflects a reasonable expectation of continued outperformance, consistent with Qnity's track record of beating its own guidance in every quarter since spin-off.

Sources: Visible Alpha consensus data (as of May 19, 2026 and August 3, 2026). Guidance from Q4 2025 Earnings Release and Q1 2026 Earnings Call (May 12, 2026).

Stock Performance

Key Takeaway: The stock's +38.6% six-month gain was driven by multiple expansion on the back of the Q4 2025 guidance raise, but the subsequent -21% pullback from the June peak has been entirely multiple compression — estimates have barely moved, meaning the stock is now cheaper on fundamentals than it was at the Q1 print.

Since the Q1 2026 earnings date (May 12, 2026), Q has underperformed both the PHLX Semiconductor Index (SOXX) and the S&P 500. The stock opened at $153.24 on May 11 (pre-earnings), surged to $168.36 on May 12 (earnings day, +9.9%), then trended lower through the summer, closing at $133.30 on August 4, 2026 — a net decline of approximately -20.8% from the earnings-day close. Over the same period, SOXX declined from $515.99 to $507.68 (-1.6%) and SPY rose from $738.18 to $757.67 (+2.6%), making Q a significant underperformer since the Q1 print.

Indexed Performance Since Q1 2026 Earnings (May 12, 2026 = 100)

Date

Q (Indexed)

SOXX (Indexed)

SPY (Indexed)

Key Event

May 12, 2026

100.0

100.0

100.0

Q1 2026 Earnings — Beat & Raise

May 22, 2026

93.2

104.1

101.0

Jun 1, 2026

90.2

110.8

102.8

Jun 16, 2026

90.4

114.6

101.6

Wolfe Research Conference (CEO fireside chat)

Jun 22, 2026

104.3

126.9

100.8

Q peak post-earnings at $175.64

Jul 1, 2026

91.1

116.2

101.0

Term loan repricing 8-K filed

Jul 29, 2026

73.3

90.1

98.8

Lam Research & Teradyne earnings (sector selloff)

Aug 4, 2026

79.2

98.4

102.6

Q2 2026 Earnings Day

Sector ETF used: SOXX (iShares Semiconductor ETF / PHLX Semiconductor Index) — appropriate for Qnity's semiconductor materials sub-sector. Note: SOXX data available through July 31, 2026 from FRED; August 4 figure estimated from available data.

Valuation context: NTM EV/EBITDA has compressed from ~20.7x (3 months ago) to ~17.5x currently, while NTM P/E has compressed from ~35x to ~28x. The 6-month period shows +38.6% price appreciation driven by multiple expansion (+19.4% on EV/EBITDA) following the Q4 2025 guidance raise. The recent pullback is entirely multiple compression — estimates have been stable — suggesting the stock is now pricing in a more normalized growth premium.

Source: Stock price data from Yahoo Finance. SOXX and SPY price data from Yahoo Finance. Valuation multiples from Implied stock performance decomposition tool.

Material News & Developments

Key Takeaway: The most important development since Q1 earnings is the July 1 term loan repricing, which reduces annual interest expense and is a direct positive for adjusted EPS and free cash flow — a modest but clean tailwind heading into Q2 results.

Insider Transaction Activity

Key Takeaway: Only one open-market transaction was identified in the post-Q1 window — a small discretionary sale by a director. No clustered buying or unusual selling activity; the absence of insider purchases at current prices is neutral, not alarming, given the stock's post-Q1 pullback.

Name

Title

Transaction Type

Shares

Date

Note

Steven Sterin

Director

Open Market Sale

400 shares

June 5, 2026 (filed June 8, 2026)

Discretionary sale; not under a 10b5-1 plan. Retained 12,195 shares post-transaction. Small in size relative to holdings.

Source: SEC Form 4 filing, Steven Sterin (Q), filed June 8, 2026. Search window: May 12 – August 3, 2026. Only open-market buys (code P) and sells (code S) included.

Peer Commentary Read-Throughs

Key Takeaway: All three peers — Lam Research, KLA, and Teradyne — reported in late July 2026 and delivered uniformly bullish forward-quarter guidance, with WFE spending raised to the low-$150B range for 2026 and advanced packaging growth accelerating well above prior expectations. The read-through for Qnity Q2 2026 is strongly positive across all key demand vectors.

Note: Only forward-looking commentary about the September 2026 quarter and beyond is included below. Historical reported-quarter results from these peers are excluded as they do not constitute read-throughs for Qnity's Q2 2026 (June quarter) results.

Lam Research (LRCX) — Reported July 29, 2026

Relevance to Qnity: Lam is a leading wafer fab equipment supplier with deep exposure to etch, deposition, and critical cleans — the same process steps where Qnity's CMP pads, slurries, and cleans are consumed. Lam's WFE outlook and advanced packaging commentary are the most direct demand read-through for Qnity's Semiconductor and ICS segments.

KLA Corporation (KLAC) — Reported July 28, 2026

Relevance to Qnity: KLA is the leading process control equipment supplier, with revenue directly tied to wafer starts and technology node transitions — the same demand drivers as Qnity's consumables. KLA's WFE market outlook and advanced packaging commentary are highly correlated with Qnity's volume and mix trends.

Teradyne (TER) — Reported July 29, 2026

Relevance to Qnity: Teradyne is a semiconductor test equipment supplier with broad exposure to memory, compute, auto/industrial, and advanced packaging test — providing a demand signal for the end markets that drive Qnity's wafer starts and materials consumption.

Peer Read-Through Summary Table

Theme

Signal

Relevant Qnity Segment

Source

2026 WFE raised to low-$150B range

Strongly positive

Semiconductor (consumables volume)

LRCX, KLAC

2027 WFE ~$190B (mid-20s% growth)

Strongly positive

Both segments (FY2027 estimates)

KLAC

Advanced packaging growing >70% YoY in 2026

Strongly positive

ICS (advanced packaging materials)

LRCX, KLAC

Memory TAM >40% larger in 2026 vs. 2025

Positive

Semiconductor (DRAM/HBM CMP & cleans)

TER

NAND inflecting for 2027 capacity additions

Positive (2027 setup)

Semiconductor (NAND CMP & cleans)

LRCX, TER

HBM intensity rivaling advanced logic

Positive

Semiconductor (HBM CMP content/wafer)

KLAC

300mm wafer production +5–10% annually

Positive

Both segments (MSI proxy)

TER

Auto/industrial recovery; mature node utilization rising

Positive

Semiconductor (mainstream logic)

TER

Mobile softness in H2 2026

Modest negative

ICS (consumer electronics PCBs)

TER

Supply chain lead times "challenging"

Neutral / watch

Both segments (raw material costs)

LRCX