Vistra Corp (VST) — Q2 2026 Earnings Preview

Company

Vistra Corp

Ticker

NYSE: VST

Reporting Period

Q2 2026 (quarter ended June 30, 2026)

Earnings Date

August 7, 2026

Prepared Date

August 6, 2026

Last Earnings

May 7, 2026 (Q1 2026 — Beat)

1. Earnings Preview

Key Takeaway: The setup into Q2 2026 is moderately constructive — consensus sits at a manageable bar on Adjusted EBITDA (~$1.64B) against a backdrop of reaffirmed full-year guidance, but the single biggest swing factor is ERCOT weather and power price realization during the quarter, which was the second warmest Q1 on record and may have carried into Q2 softness.

Heading into Q2 2026, Vistra's setup is one of a company with strong structural tailwinds but near-term commodity noise. Consensus Adjusted EBITDA of ~$1.64B represents a modest step-up from Q2 2025's $1.35B actual, a bar that appears achievable given higher PJM capacity revenues (the 2028/2029 auction cleared at $325/MW-day for ~10.9 GW of Vistra capacity, announced July 14) and continued nuclear fleet strength. Management's tone on the Q1 call was confident — CEO Jim Burke declared "2026 is off to a fast start" and reaffirmed full-year 2026 Adjusted EBITDA guidance — and there has been no post-earnings guidance revision, suggesting the company is comfortable with the range. Estimate revisions since the Q1 print have been modestly positive for the full year (+1.6% on FY2026 EBITDA) but slightly negative for Q2 specifically (-3.5%), reflecting the market's concern about mild ERCOT weather and soft near-term power curves that peers like NRG and Constellation also flagged. The stock is down ~8% since the Q1 print (vs. XLU -4%, SPY +5%), suggesting the market has already discounted some weather/price softness and the stock is not priced for perfection. The key wildcard is the Cogentrix acquisition close timing and any incremental nuclear contracting announcement — either could serve as a positive catalyst that resets the narrative from near-term weather noise to long-term structural value creation.

2. KPIs & Consensus Expectations

Key Takeaway: Consensus sets a manageable bar on Adjusted EBITDA (~$1.64B vs. $1.35B in Q2 2025, +21% YoY), but the bar on EPS ($1.51) is well below Q2 2025's $0.81 actual on a reported basis — Adjusted EBITDA is the primary swing factor and the metric management guides to; EPS is noisy due to mark-to-market derivatives.

Table 1 — Q2 2026 Current Quarter Snapshot

KPI

Q1 2026 Actual (Last Quarter)

Q2 2025 Actual (Prior Year)

Q2 2026 Consensus Estimate

YoY Change

Guidance

Consensus vs. Guidance

Adjusted EBITDA ($B)

$1.494B

$1.349B

$1.638B

+21.4%

FY2026: $6.5B–$7.5B (midpoint $7.0B); no Q2-specific guidance

N/A (no Q2 guidance)

Total Revenue ($B)

$5.640B

$4.250B

$5.513B

+29.7%

No Q2-specific guidance

N/A

EPS — Diluted ($)

$2.87

$0.81

$1.51

+86.4%

No Q2-specific guidance

N/A

Capacity Revenue ($M)

$122M

$130M

$402M

+209%

No Q2-specific guidance

N/A

Capital Expenditures ($M)

$883M

$690M

$497M

-28.0%

FY2026: ~$2.1B

N/A (FY only)

Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data. All consensus figures as of latest available (August 2026). Q2 2026 Adjusted EBITDA consensus of $1.638B; Total Revenue consensus of $5.513B; EPS consensus of $1.51; Capacity Revenue consensus of $402M; CapEx consensus of $497M.

Table 2 — Beat/Miss History (Last 8 Quarters, Top 2 KPIs)

Top 2 KPIs: Adjusted EBITDA and EPS — Diluted

Quarter

KPI

Reported

Consensus

Surprise %

Result

Q1 2026

Adj. EBITDA

$1.494B

$1.478B

+1.1%

Beat

Q1 2026

EPS — Diluted

$2.87

$2.12

+35.4%

Large Beat

Q4 2025

Adj. EBITDA

$1.726B

$1.683B

+2.6%

Beat

Q4 2025

EPS — Diluted

$0.55

$3.09

-82.2%

Miss (MTM)

Q3 2025

Adj. EBITDA

$1.564B

$1.741B

-10.2%

Miss

Q3 2025

EPS — Diluted

$1.75

$2.64

-33.7%

Miss (MTM)

Q2 2025

Adj. EBITDA

$1.349B

$1.383B

-2.5%

Slight Miss

Q2 2025

EPS — Diluted

$0.81

$0.98

-17.3%

Miss (MTM)

Q1 2025

Adj. EBITDA

$1.240B

$1.065B

+16.4%

Beat

Q1 2025

EPS — Diluted

-$0.93

$0.85

N/M

Miss (MTM)

Q4 2024

Adj. EBITDA

$1.934B

$1.588B

+21.8%

Large Beat

Q4 2024

EPS — Diluted

$1.09

$0.79

+38.0%

Beat

Q3 2024

Adj. EBITDA

$1.427B

$1.372B

+4.0%

Beat

Q3 2024

EPS — Diluted

$5.25

$1.27

+313%

Large Beat

Q2 2024

Adj. EBITDA

$1.388B

$0.550B

+152%

Large Beat

Q2 2024

EPS — Diluted

$0.90

$0.36

+153%

Large Beat

Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data. Note: EPS misses in Q3 2025, Q4 2025, Q1 2025, and Q2 2025 are largely driven by mark-to-market (MTM) derivative accounting, which is excluded from Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA is the primary operating metric management guides to and analysts focus on.

Pattern: VST has beaten Adjusted EBITDA consensus in 6 of the last 8 quarters, with the two misses concentrated in Q2–Q3 2025 when ERCOT weather was unfavorable; EPS is highly volatile due to MTM accounting and is a poor predictor of operational performance.

4. Guidance vs. Estimate Revision Tracker

Key Takeaway: FY2026 Adjusted EBITDA estimates have risen +1.6% since the Q1 print (from $7.27B to $7.38B), tracking above the guidance midpoint of $7.0B — the gap is a cushion, not a risk; Q2 2026 estimates have drifted slightly lower (-3.5%) since the print, reflecting mild weather concerns flagged by peers.

KPI & Period

Estimate (5 Days Post Q1 Print, ~May 12, 2026)

Current Consensus

Estimate Δ (%)

Initial Guidance (Q1 2026 Call)

Current Guidance

Guidance Δ

Consensus vs. Guidance (%)

Adj. EBITDA — Q2 2026

$1.698B

$1.638B

-3.5%

No Q2-specific guidance

No Q2-specific guidance

N/A

N/A

Adj. EBITDA — FY2026

$7.270B

$7.385B

+1.6%

$6.5B – $7.5B (midpoint $7.0B)

Unchanged (reaffirmed May 7, 2026)

0%

+5.5% above midpoint

Adj. EBITDA — FY2027

$8.264B

$8.320B

+0.7%

Midpoint opportunity range maintained (no formal range)

Unchanged

0%

N/A (no formal range)

EPS — Diluted, Q2 2026

$1.832

$1.513

-17.4%

No Q2-specific guidance

No Q2-specific guidance

N/A

N/A

EPS — Diluted, FY2026

$8.979

$8.919

-0.7%

No formal EPS guidance

No formal EPS guidance

N/A

N/A

Total Revenue — Q2 2026

$5.044B

$5.513B

+9.3%

No Q2-specific guidance

No Q2-specific guidance

N/A

N/A

Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data. Baseline as of May 12, 2026 (5 trading days post Q1 2026 earnings). Current consensus as of latest available (August 2026).

The divergence between Q2-specific estimate drift (-3.5% on EBITDA) and full-year stability (+1.6%) suggests the market is treating Q2 as a weather-impacted quarter but not revising the structural earnings power story. FY2026 consensus of $7.38B sitting 5.5% above the guidance midpoint of $7.0B implies the street expects Vistra to execute toward the high end of its range, consistent with the Q1 beat and management's confident tone.

5. Stock Performance

Key Takeaway: VST is down ~8.2% since the Q1 2026 earnings date (May 7) vs. XLU -3.9% and SPY +5.1% — the underperformance is sentiment and multiple-driven, not estimate-driven, as FY2026 EBITDA estimates have actually risen +1.6% over the same period; the stock appears to have already priced in Q2 weather softness.

VST vs. XLU vs. S&P 500 — Indexed to 100 at May 7, 2026 (Q1 2026 Earnings Date). Source: Stock Price Data.

Sector ETF used: XLU (Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund) — appropriate for VST given its classification as an integrated power generation and retail electricity company in the utilities sector. VST peaked at $168.98 on July 23, 2026 (+9.8% from earnings date), driven by the PJM capacity auction results ($325/MW-day for 10.9 GW, announced July 14) and the Helix Digital Infrastructure partnership announcement (June 11). The stock then sold off sharply from late July through early August, giving back all gains and more, likely on broader market volatility and profit-taking ahead of earnings. The stock's underperformance vs. SPY (+5.1%) is notable given that FY2026 EBITDA estimates rose +1.6% over the same period, suggesting the de-rating is multiple compression rather than earnings deterioration — a potentially attractive setup if Q2 results confirm the structural story.

6. Material News & Developments

Key Takeaway: The most important post-Q1 development is the PJM 2028/2029 capacity auction clearing at $325/MW-day for 10.9 GW of Vistra capacity (July 14) — a direct, quantifiable earnings tailwind for future periods that validates the scarcity value of Vistra's dispatchable fleet.

7. Peer Commentaries — Q2 2026 Read-Throughs

Key Takeaway: Peers reporting Q2 2026 results (CEG, NRG, EXC, ETR) collectively confirm ERCOT near-term softness is well-understood and expected, PJM capacity scarcity is intensifying, and hyperscaler engagement remains robust — all directionally positive read-throughs for VST's Q2 print and long-term positioning. The most important signal: CEG's 920 MW of new nuclear deals signed in Q2 at 18.5-year average duration confirms the nuclear contracting market is active, which is directly relevant to VST's ~3.2 GW of uncontracted nuclear capacity at Beaver Valley and Comanche Peak.

Constellation Energy (CEG) — Q2 2026 Earnings Call (August 6, 2026)

Relevance to VST: Highest read-through. CEG is VST's closest nuclear peer and competes in the same PJM markets.

NRG Energy (NRG) — Q2 2026 Earnings Call (August 4, 2026)

Relevance to VST: High read-through. NRG is a direct competitor in ERCOT retail and PJM generation markets.

Exelon (EXC) — Q2 2026 Earnings Call (July 30, 2026)

Relevance to VST: Moderate read-through. EXC is a regulated utility operating in PJM markets (ComEd, PECO, BGE, Pepco). Provides insight into PJM grid stress and capacity market dynamics.

Entergy (ETR) — Q2 2026 Earnings Call (July 29, 2026)

Relevance to VST: Lower direct read-through (ETR is a regulated utility in the Gulf South, not a direct competitor), but provides useful color on hyperscaler demand trends and new nuclear development.

Disclaimer: This earnings preview is prepared for informational purposes only and is based on publicly available information including SEC filings, earnings call transcripts, and third-party consensus data from Visible Alpha. All consensus estimates are sourced from Visible Alpha and are as of the dates noted. Stock price data sourced from Yahoo Finance. Insider transaction data sourced from SEC Form 4 filings. This document does not constitute investment advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results.