Moderna Announces Positive Phase 3 Results for Seasonal Influenza Vaccine

Analysis reveals significant industry trends and economic implications

Release Date

2025-06-30

Category

Clinical Trial Event

Reference

Source

Breakthrough Clinical Results

Moderna announced positive Phase 3 results for its seasonal influenza vaccine candidate, mRNA-1010. The study demonstrated a 26.6% higher relative vaccine efficacy compared to a standard-dose flu vaccine in adults aged 50 and older. Strong efficacy was observed across different influenza strains and subgroups. mRNA-1010 showed a consistent efficacy across age groups, risk factors, and prior vaccination status. The safety profile was consistent with previous studies, with mostly mild side effects. Moderna plans to submit these findings to regulators and publish them in a peer-reviewed journal.

Key Highlights

  • mRNA-1010 demonstrated 26.6% higher relative vaccine efficacy than a standard-dose flu vaccine in adults 50+.
  • Strong efficacy observed across all influenza strains included in the vaccine.
  • Consistent efficacy across various subgroups (age, risk factors, prior vaccination status).
  • Safety and tolerability profile consistent with previous Phase 3 study, with mostly mild side effects.

Economic Burden

Economic Burden of Influenza in the USA and Europe

According to the available information, in the USA economic costs of influenza range, depending on the epidemic season, from 76 billions to 167 billions US dollars. This appears to be the only specific economic cost estimate for influenza treatment burden in the United States mentioned in the source material.

It's worth noting that no specific timeframe or year is provided for these cost estimates in the source material, and there are no more recent or detailed breakdowns of these economic costs available in the provided information.

Regarding Europe, the provided information does not contain specific economic burden estimates for influenza treatment in European countries.

While there is information about economic burden in other countries like Armenia, Colombia, and Japan, as well as general statements about economic impact, there are no specific recent estimates for Europe in the provided texts.

Study Design Parameters

Influenza Study Design Parameters and Endpoints

Study Designs

Influenza research employs various study methodologies to evaluate prevention, treatment, and epidemiology:

  • Randomized controlled trials comparing favipiravir (1800 mg BID on day 1, 800 mg BID on days 2-5) versus placebo in adults with uncomplicated influenza
  • Cross-sectional studies for assessing vaccination coverage among healthcare personnel
  • Prospective global study (HARTI) conducted in adults hospitalized with acute respiratory tract infection across 40 centers in 12 countries
  • Phase IIIb-IV, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trials
  • Double-blind, placebo-controlled trials
  • Retrospective cohort studies
  • Real-world studies using national health databases
  • Quantitative analysis of media coverage on influenza and immunization-related topics
  • Real-time RT-PCR methods for influenza virus detection (subtypes A(H1N1)pdm09, H3N2, and influenza-B)
  • In vitro and in vivo testing of treatments such as equine polyclonal immunoglobulin fragments (F(ab')2)
  • Suspension microbead array (MBA) analysis for detecting influenza-specific antibodies

Study Populations

Research has focused on diverse populations:

  • Adults with uncomplicated influenza in favipiravir trials (N=827 for favipiravir, N=419 for placebo)
  • Adults 65 years of age or older in high-dose vaccine trials
  • Healthcare personnel in vaccination coverage studies
  • Adults hospitalized with acute respiratory tract infections
  • BALB/c mice challenged with H5N1 for testing treatments
  • Patients with influenza-like-illness for cytokine studies (350 patients screened)
  • Caregivers of hospitalized children (N=522; 88.9% response rate)
  • Otherwise healthy adults with influenza-like symptoms and fever of ≤48 hours (favipiravir trials)
  • High-risk outpatients aged ≥6 months with acute respiratory illness
  • Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years

Primary Endpoints

Key primary endpoints in influenza studies include:

  • Time to illness alleviation when 6 influenza symptoms were self-rated as absent or mild and fever was absent (favipiravir trials)
  • Laboratory-confirmed influenza caused by any viral type or subtype associated with protocol-defined influenza-like illness (high-dose vaccine trial)
  • Neutralizing titers against H1N1 virus (subjects classified as responders if titers increased ≥4-fold at D14 compared to D0)

Secondary Endpoints and Efficacy Measurements

Studies evaluate multiple secondary outcomes:

  • Viral titers in nasopharyngeal samples measured as log10TCID50/ml
  • Viral titers and RNA load area under the curve over days 1-5
  • Median times to cessation of virus detection
  • Plasma concentrations of favipiravir with target average Cmin ≥20μg/ml
  • Hemagglutination-inhibition (HAI) titers
  • Seroprotection rates (percentage of participants with HAI titers ≥1:40)
  • Antibody responses to influenza
  • Prevention of influenza-associated illnesses, medical visits, hospitalizations, and deaths
  • Relative vaccine effectiveness (RVE) in preventing hospital encounters
  • Cytokine levels (IL-6, IL-8, IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-10) measured by cytometric-bead-array with flow cytometry
  • mRNA expression of cytokines quantified by real-time RT-PCR
  • Vaccination coverage rates among different healthcare worker categories
  • Survival rates in mice treated with F(ab')2 against H5N1 (60% increase with optimal protocol)
  • Length of hospital stay and supplemental oxygen use in respiratory infections
  • Readmission rates (20-33% within 3 months post-discharge)
  • In-hospital mortality for RSV (2.5%), influenza (1.6%), and hMPV (2%)
  • Influenza vaccine acceptance among caregivers of hospitalized children (30.3%)

Safety Assessments

Safety monitoring includes:

  • Serious adverse events during safety surveillance period
  • In high-dose vaccine trial: 8.3% of participants in IIV3-HD group vs 9.0% in IIV3-SD group reported at least one serious adverse event (relative risk, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.85-0.99)
  • Asymptomatic hyperuricemia noted in favipiravir trials

Statistical Analyses

Analytical approaches include:

  • Intention-to-treat analysis
  • Relative efficacy calculations with 95% confidence intervals
  • Poisson regression
  • Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)
  • Test-negative design for estimating vaccine effectiveness
  • Compartmental model to estimate numbers of influenza-associated outcomes prevented by vaccination
  • Multivariate analysis to identify independent risk factors
  • Mann-Whitney nonparametric tests for comparing antibody responses
  • Multivariable logistic regression to examine associations between survey responses and vaccination status
  • Chi-square tests to compare vaccination coverage between different healthcare professions
  • Post-hoc analyses to assess frequency of reaching target drug concentrations and association with antiviral efficacy

Biomarkers and Correlates

Studies utilize various biomarkers:

  • Immunoglobulin levels (IgA1 and IgG1) as markers of immune response
  • Cytokine profiles as indicators of disease severity
  • T-705-M1 to favipiravir ratio as marker of drug metabolism

mRNA-1010 Clinical Development Beyond Influenza

Based on the available information, there is no evidence that mRNA-1010 is being trialed for any indications other than influenza. The comprehensive review of data indicates that mRNA-1010 is exclusively being developed as a seasonal influenza vaccine candidate.

Without any documented clinical trials exploring alternative therapeutic applications, there are consequently no intervention models or clinical trial design methodologies to report for non-influenza applications of this specific messenger RNA vaccine candidate.

The development focus of mRNA-1010 appears to remain solely directed toward addressing seasonal influenza as its target indication.