Median overall LLM-judge: 8/10 · mean 7.92/10 · per-axis medians: layout 9, color 9, typography 7, content 10.
Out of scope for the Tendril Battle (Image-to-code is excluded). Reported for transparency only.


Nearly identical; the regenerated version omits the final 'This is a website. Look at it. You've never seen one before.' heading at the bottom.


The regenerated version is missing the profile photo (shows a black circle instead) and lacks the textured/grunge background overlay present in the original.


Layout and text content match closely, but the lighthouse image is a blurry abstract gradient instead of the original photographic lighthouse.


Regenerated version is missing the Legal Disclaimer and Copyright footer text visible in the original.


Very close reproduction of the Hacker News-style listing; minor differences in spacing/density and a slightly different footer area.


Slightly tighter row spacing and a marginally smaller gap between the date column and the link column in the regenerated version.


Content is faithfully reproduced but the regenerated layout has excessive whitespace and a misplaced logo, unlike the original's compact, narrow layout.


The regenerated version uses a wider viewport with more whitespace, but the layout structure, orange header, and text content closely match the original.


Layout and content match closely, but the profile photo and emoji/icon images are rendered as abstract color blocks instead of the actual images.


Regenerated version is much taller/wider with expanded content visible, while the original is a compact thumbnail showing the same page at smaller scale.


Nav button styling differs slightly (regenerated buttons appear lighter/flatter without the bevel of the original).


Headings use a regular sans-serif instead of the original's small-caps serif/slab font, making titles like 'Derek Sivers' and section headers visually different.


Regenerated version is nearly identical with matching layout, colors, typography, and content; only minor differences in vertical spacing/proportions due to taller canvas.


Layout and text content closely match, but the profile photo is replaced by an abstract orange/brown shape instead of the actual portrait.


The yellow circle is positioned and sized differently (smaller, shifted right) and a black bracket shape replaces the partial letter on the right edge.


Content and structure match closely, but the regenerated version uses a much wider viewport with extra whitespace, while the original is more compact.


Regenerated version has slightly more vertical spacing pushing content lower, otherwise nearly identical.


Regenerated grid preserves structure and most tile content but lacks the original illustrations and decorative imagery within tiles.


Layout and content closely match, but the regenerated card images are simplified vector approximations rather than the originals' detailed artwork.


Logo icon differs (stylized rocket/pencil in original vs plain 'X' in regenerated) and toolbar icons vary slightly.


Layout and panel match closely; main divergence is the missing 'tldraw' wordmark next to the logo (only 't' icon shown).


Layout and content are similar but the regenerated version uses a dark brown/black background instead of the original's light cream/yellow background, inverting the color palette.


Regenerated version has slightly larger spacing/font sizing pushing the search box and footer lower, but layout, palette, and content are nearly identical.


Regenerated version preserves overall layout and color palette but lacks the prominent search bar, browser scores table styling, and some visual polish present in the original.


Nearly identical layout and content; only minor differences in font rendering and slight spacing/positioning.