{
  "legislationId": "119_HRES_1062",
  "lastUpdate": "2026-04-24T11:14:42.848Z",
  "history": [
    {
      "timestamp": "2026-04-24T11:14:42.848Z",
      "source_url": "https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/hres1062/BILLS-119hres1062ih.htm",
      "model": "gemini-flash-lite-latest",
      "prompt_sent": "\nROLE: Fact Checker.\nZADANIE: Porównaj SOURCE (oryginał) i SUMMARY (streszczenie przygotowane przez inne AI).\n\nTwoim celem jest wykrycie \"ZMYŚLONYCH KONKRETÓW\" (Fabricated Entities) w SUMMARY.\n\nSOURCE:\n[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H. Res. 1062 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. RES. 1062 Denouncing statements by President Donald J. Trump that he may ``nationalize,'' commandeer, or otherwise assume direct control over elections. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES February 12, 2026 Mr. Mfume submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary _______________________________________________________________________ RESOLUTION Denouncing statements by President Donald J. Trump that he may ``nationalize,'' commandeer, or otherwise assume direct control over elections. Whereas the Constitution of the United States vests primary authority over the times, places, and manner of Federal elections in the legislatures of the several States and Congress, and does not assign to the President any power to directly control or administer elections; Whereas section 4 of article I of the Constitution of the United States provides that ``The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations,'' underscoring State control over electoral administration; Whereas public statements by President Donald J. Trump urging members of one political party to ``take over the voting'' and calling for Republicans to ``nationalize the voting,'' including a Federal takeover of election processes in ``at least many, 15 places,'' represent a proposal that would require the Federal executive branch to displace the constitutionally assigned role of State and local authorities in administering elections; Whereas the Constitution's framework reflects a fundamental structural commitment to federalism and to the separation of powers between the legislative, executive, and judicial branches, with States primarily responsible for regulating elections, subject to guardrails by Congress; Whereas repeated claims that the 2020 presidential election was ``rigged'' or marked by widespread, systemic fraud have been rejected by Federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies in the first Trump Administration, State election officials, courts, and independent fact-checking, and have no credible evidentiary basis; Whereas any attempt by the President to exercise unilateral authority over the conduct of Federal elections, absent a clear grant of constitutional or statutory power by Congress, would be illegal, unconstitutional, and without lawful effect; Whereas the President has a constitutional obligation to ``take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed,'' not to disregard the constitutional order or to pursue actions that usurp powers reserved to the States or to Congress; and Whereas the Senate affirms that preserving the constitutional allocation of powers over elections is essential to the integrity of the Republic, the rule of law, and the public's confidence in democratic self-government: Now, therefore, be it Resolved, That the House of Representatives-- (1) finds that the Constitution of the United States entrusts the primary oversight and administration of Federal elections to State and local authorities and Congress; (2) rejects any suggestion that the President of the United States may lawfully ``nationalize,'' commandeer, or otherwise assume direct control over elections; (3) renounces any effort by the President to exercise such authority, absent explicit constitutional or statutory grant, as antithetical to the Constitution, unlawful, and without effect; (4) expresses its grave concern that public advocacy of unconstitutional power by the President undermines foundational principles of federalism, threatens the rule of law, and erodes public trust in the democratic process; and (5) maintains that should the President attempt to implement or execute measures that unconstitutionally infringe on the constitutional prerogatives of the States or contrary to the laws enacted by Congress, such conduct would constitute grounds for impeachment and removal from office under article II of the Constitution. <all>\n\nSUMMARY TO EVALUATE:\nTitle: Resolution Denouncing Presidential Control Over State and Local Elections\nSummary: This resolution opposes any attempts by the President to take direct control of how elections are run, ensuring they remain managed by states and local authorities. It aims to protect the current voting system and prevent illegal interference from the federal executive branch.\nKey Points: Reaffirms that states and Congress hold the primary power to administer federal elections., Rejects any proposal for a federal takeover or 'nationalization' of voting processes by the President., States that unauthorized presidential control over elections is unconstitutional and without legal effect., Declares that attempting to seize control of elections constitutes grounds for impeachment and removal from office.\n\nZASADY OCENY:\n1. Sprawdź wszystkie LICZBY, DATY i KWOTY w SUMMARY. Jeśli którejś brakuje w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n2. Sprawdź wszystkie NAZWISKA, ORGANIZACJE i MIEJSCA w SUMMARY. Jeśli którejś brakuje w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n3. Sprawdź wszystkie konkretne DZIAŁANIA PRAWNE . Jeśli tego mechanizmu nie ma w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n\nWAŻNE: Abstrakcyjne pojęcia (np. \"transparentność\", \"zaufanie\") są dozwolone jako wnioski.\n\nOUTPUT (JSON):\n{\n  \"is_valid\": true/false,\n  \"issue\": \"fabricated_entity\" / \"contradiction\" / \"none\"\n}\n\nWYMAGANIA FORMATOWANIA:\n1. Odpowiedz WYŁĄCZNIE surowym obiektem JSON.\n2. NIE używaj bloków kodu Markdown.\n3. NIE dodawaj żadnych wstępów ani wyjaśnień przed ani po JSONie.\n4. JSON musi być poprawny i gotowy do parsowania.\n\n",
      "ai_response_raw": "{\n  \"is_valid\": true,\n  \"issue\": \"none\"\n}"
    },
    {
      "timestamp": "2026-04-24T11:10:37.424Z",
      "source_url": "https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/hres1062/BILLS-119hres1062ih.htm",
      "model": "gemini-flash-latest",
      "prompt_sent": "\nJesteś ekspertem od prawa Stanów Zjednoczonych, który ma za zadanie analizować dokumenty ustaw, uchwał oraz innych dokumentów legislacyjnych, a następnie przygotowywać z nich informacje w przystępny sposób dla obywateli. Twoim celem jest przedstawienie informacji tak, aby obywatele mogli sami ocenić wpływ legislacji na ich życie, nawet bez posiadania specjalistycznej wiedzy legislacyjnej. Skup się na faktach i obiektywnych skutkach wprowadzanych zmian, unikając wartościowania i osobistych opinii. Wszelki żargon prawny jest zabroniony. Prezentuj informacje w jasny, zwięzły i angażujący sposób, tak aby były zrozumiałe dla osoby bez wykształcenia prawniczego. Unikaj długich, złożonych zdań. Zamiast pisać \"projekt ma na celu nowelizację kodeksu podatkowego...\", napisz \"Zmiany w podatkach: nowe ulgi i obowiązki dla...\". Kontynuuj swoją pracę, dopóki nie rozwiążesz swojego zadania. Jeśli nie masz pewności co do generowanej treści, przeanalizuj dokument ponownie – nie zgaduj. Rozplanuj dobrze swoje zadanie przed przystąpieniem do niego. W podsumowaniu i kluczowych punktach, jeśli to możliwe i uzasadnione, podkreśl, jakie konkretne korzyści lub skutki (pozytywne lub negatywne) wprowadza ustawa dla życia codziennego obywateli, ich praw i obowiązków, finansów osobistych, bezpieczeństwa i innych ważnych kwestii (np. kategorycznych zakazów i nakazów czy najważniejszych konkretnych alokacji finansowych i terytorialnych).\n\nTwoja odpowiedź MUSI być w formacie JSON - i zawierać następujące klucze.\nZanim zwrócisz odpowiedź, dokładnie zweryfikuj, czy cała struktura JSON jest w 100% poprawna, włącznie ze wszystkimi przecinkami, nawiasami klamrowymi, kwadratowymi oraz cudzysłowami. Błędny JSON jest nieakceptowalny i uniemożliwi przetworzenie Twojej pracy.\n\nPrzeanalizuj dokładnie poniższy tekst dokumentu prawnego. To jest treść, na podstawie której masz wygenerować podsumowanie i kluczowe punkty:\n--- POCZĄTEK DOKUMENTU ---\n[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H. Res. 1062 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. RES. 1062 Denouncing statements by President Donald J. Trump that he may ``nationalize,'' commandeer, or otherwise assume direct control over elections. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES February 12, 2026 Mr. Mfume submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary _______________________________________________________________________ RESOLUTION Denouncing statements by President Donald J. Trump that he may ``nationalize,'' commandeer, or otherwise assume direct control over elections. Whereas the Constitution of the United States vests primary authority over the times, places, and manner of Federal elections in the legislatures of the several States and Congress, and does not assign to the President any power to directly control or administer elections; Whereas section 4 of article I of the Constitution of the United States provides that ``The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations,'' underscoring State control over electoral administration; Whereas public statements by President Donald J. Trump urging members of one political party to ``take over the voting'' and calling for Republicans to ``nationalize the voting,'' including a Federal takeover of election processes in ``at least many, 15 places,'' represent a proposal that would require the Federal executive branch to displace the constitutionally assigned role of State and local authorities in administering elections; Whereas the Constitution's framework reflects a fundamental structural commitment to federalism and to the separation of powers between the legislative, executive, and judicial branches, with States primarily responsible for regulating elections, subject to guardrails by Congress; Whereas repeated claims that the 2020 presidential election was ``rigged'' or marked by widespread, systemic fraud have been rejected by Federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies in the first Trump Administration, State election officials, courts, and independent fact-checking, and have no credible evidentiary basis; Whereas any attempt by the President to exercise unilateral authority over the conduct of Federal elections, absent a clear grant of constitutional or statutory power by Congress, would be illegal, unconstitutional, and without lawful effect; Whereas the President has a constitutional obligation to ``take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed,'' not to disregard the constitutional order or to pursue actions that usurp powers reserved to the States or to Congress; and Whereas the Senate affirms that preserving the constitutional allocation of powers over elections is essential to the integrity of the Republic, the rule of law, and the public's confidence in democratic self-government: Now, therefore, be it Resolved, That the House of Representatives-- (1) finds that the Constitution of the United States entrusts the primary oversight and administration of Federal elections to State and local authorities and Congress; (2) rejects any suggestion that the President of the United States may lawfully ``nationalize,'' commandeer, or otherwise assume direct control over elections; (3) renounces any effort by the President to exercise such authority, absent explicit constitutional or statutory grant, as antithetical to the Constitution, unlawful, and without effect; (4) expresses its grave concern that public advocacy of unconstitutional power by the President undermines foundational principles of federalism, threatens the rule of law, and erodes public trust in the democratic process; and (5) maintains that should the President attempt to implement or execute measures that unconstitutionally infringe on the constitutional prerogatives of the States or contrary to the laws enacted by Congress, such conduct would constitute grounds for impeachment and removal from office under article II of the Constitution. <all>\n--- KONIEC DOKUMENTU ---\n\nPAMIĘTAJ: Twoja odpowiedź MUSI być wyłącznie poprawnym obiektem JSON. Nie dodawaj żadnych dodatkowych znaków, komentarzy ani tekstu przed znacznikiem '{' ani po znaczniku '}'. Cała odpowiedź musi być parsowalna jako JSON.\nNa podstawie POWYŻSZEGO dokumentu, wypełnij poniższą strukturę JSON:\nOto struktura JSON, której oczekuję (wypełnij ją treścią):\n{\n  \"pl_ai_title\": \"Nowy, krótki tytuł dla aktu prawnego po polsku, oddający sedno wprowadzanych zmian (np. maksymalnie 10-12 słów).\",\n  \"pl_summary\": \"2-3 zdania zwięzłego podsumowania treści aktu prawnego po polsku, napisane z perspektywy wpływu na życie codzienne obywateli.\",\n  \"pl_key_points\": [\n    \"Pierwszy krótki punkt po polsku dotyczący najważniejszych wprowadzanych rozwiązań lub zmian.\",\n    \"Drugi krótki punkt po polsku...\"\n  ],\n  \"eng_ai_title\": \"A new, short title for the legal act in English, capturing the essence of the changes (e.g., max 10-12 words).\",\n  \"eng_summary\": \"2-3 sentences summarizing the legal act in English, from the perspective of its impact on citizens' daily lives.\",\n  \"eng_key_points\": [\n    \"First short bullet point in English regarding the most important solutions or changes being introduced.\",\n    \"Second short bullet point in English...\"\n  ],\n  \"de_ai_title\": \"Ein neuer, kurzer Titel für das Rechtsdokument auf Deutsch, der den Kern der Änderungen erfasst (z.B. max. 10-12 Wörter).\",\n  \"de_summary\": \"2-3 Sätze Zusammenfassung des Rechtsdokuments auf Deutsch, aus der Perspektive seiner Auswirkungen auf das tägliche Leben der Bürger.\",\n  \"de_key_points\": [\n    \"Erster kurzer Stichpunkt auf Deutsch zu den wichtigsten eingeführten Lösungen oder Änderungen.\",\n    \"Zweiter kurzer Stichpunkt auf Deutsch...\"\n  ],\n  \"fr_ai_title\": \"Un nouveau titre court pour l'acte juridique en français, saisissant l'essence des changements (par exemple, 10-12 mots maximum).\",\n  \"fr_summary\": \"Résumé de 2-3 phrases de l'acte juridique en français, du point de vue de son impact sur la vie quotidienne des citoyens.\",\n  \"fr_key_points\": [\n    \"Premier court point en français concernant les solutions ou changements les plus importants introduits.\",\n    \"Deuxième court point en français...\"\n  ],\n  \"es_ai_title\": \"Un nuevo título breve para el acto jurídico en español, que recoja la esencia de los cambios (por ejemplo, máximo 10-12 palabras).\",\n  \"es_summary\": \"Resumen de 2-3 frases del acto jurídico en español, desde la perspectiva de su impacto en la vida cotidiana de los ciudadanos.\",\n  \"es_key_points\": [\n    \"Primer punto breve en español sobre las soluciones o cambios más importantes que se introducen.\",\n    \"Segundo punto breve en español...\"\n  ],\n  \"it_ai_title\": \"Un nuovo titolo breve per l'atto giuridico in italiano, che colga l'essenza delle modifiche (ad es. massimo 10-12 parole).\",\n  \"it_summary\": \"Riepilogo di 2-3 frasi dell'atto giuridico in italiano, dal punto di vista del suo impatto sulla vita quotidiana dei cittadini.\",\n  \"it_key_points\": [\n    \"Primo breve punto in italiano riguardante le soluzioni o le modifiche più importanti introdotte.\",\n    \"Secondo breve punto in italiano...\"\n  ],\n  \"nl_ai_title\": \"Een nieuwe, korte titel voor de rechtshandeling in het Nederlands, die de essentie van de wijzigingen weergeeft (bijv. max. 10-12 woorden).\",\n  \"nl_summary\": \"Samenvatting van 2-3 zinnen van de rechtshandeling in het Nederlands, vanuit het perspectief van de impact op het dagelijks leven van burgers.\",\n  \"nl_key_points\": [\n    \"Eerste korte punt in het Nederlands betreffende de belangrijkste geïntroduceerde oplossingen of wijzigingen.\",\n    \"Tweede korte punt in het Nederlands...\"\n  ],\n  \"pt_ai_title\": \"Um novo título curto para o ato jurídico em português, capturando a essência das mudanças (por exemplo, máx. 10-12 palavras).\",\n  \"pt_summary\": \"Resumo de 2-3 frases do ato jurídico em português, na perspetiva do seu impacto na vida quotidiana dos cidadãos.\",\n  \"pt_key_points\": [\n    \"Primeiro ponto curto em português sobre as soluções ou alterações mais importantes introduzidas.\",\n    \"Segundo ponto curto em português...\"\n  ],\n  \"category\": [\"Categorize the document into one category by default, based on the field it primarily concerns. Choose up to 3 if the document also touches upon SIGNIFICANT issues from other categories. You MUST select categories ONLY from the following list: Health, Education, Family, Taxes, Labor, Security, Environment, Courts and Law, Transport, Benefits, Real Estate, Media and Culture, Local Government, Migration, Agriculture, Public Investments, Informatization, Economy. If the document does not definitively fit any of these, you MUST use \"Other\". If you use \"Other\", it should be the ONLY category selected. Do NOT invent new categories. The response must be an array of strings, e.g., [\"Taxes\", \"Family\"].\"]\n}\n\n",
      "ai_response_raw": "{\n  \"pl_ai_title\": \"Rezolucja w obronie niezależności wyborów przed kontrolą prezydencką\",\n  \"pl_summary\": \"Dokument ten sprzeciwia się próbom przejęcia przez prezydenta bezpośredniej kontroli nad wyborami, co ma chronić lokalne zasady głosowania. Zapewnia on, że to stany, a nie władza centralna, decydują o sposobie przeprowadzania wyborów w Twojej okolicy.\",\n  \"pl_key_points\": [\n    \"Potwierdzenie, że to stany i Kongres, a nie prezydent, mają prawo zarządzać wyborami.\",\n    \"Odrzucenie pomysłu „nacjonalizacji” lub przejmowania kontroli nad procesem głosowania przez Biały Dom.\",\n    \"Ostrzeżenie, że próba nielegalnego wpływania na wybory przez prezydenta jest podstawą do jego usunięcia z urzędu (impeachmentu).\",\n    \"Ochrona zaufania obywateli do uczciwości i lokalnego charakteru procesu demokratycznego.\"\n  ],\n  \"eng_ai_title\": \"Resolution Denouncing Presidential Control Over State and Local Elections\",\n  \"eng_summary\": \"This resolution opposes any attempts by the President to take direct control of how elections are run, ensuring they remain managed by states and local authorities. It aims to protect the current voting system and prevent illegal interference from the federal executive branch.\",\n  \"eng_key_points\": [\n    \"Reaffirms that states and Congress hold the primary power to administer federal elections.\",\n    \"Rejects any proposal for a federal takeover or 'nationalization' of voting processes by the President.\",\n    \"States that unauthorized presidential control over elections is unconstitutional and without legal effect.\",\n    \"Declares that attempting to seize control of elections constitutes grounds for impeachment and removal from office.\"\n  ],\n  \"de_ai_title\": \"Resolution gegen die Übernahme der Wahlkontrolle durch den Präsidenten\",\n  \"de_summary\": \"Dieses Dokument lehnt Versuche des Präsidenten ab, die direkte Kontrolle über Wahlen zu übernehmen, um die Unabhängigkeit der Bundesstaaten zu wahren. Es stellt sicher, dass die Bürger weiterhin unter lokalen und staatlichen Regeln wählen, ohne unbefugte Einmischung der Regierung.\",\n  \"de_key_points\": [\n    \"Bestätigung der verfassungsmäßigen Zuständigkeit der Bundesstaaten für die Wahldurchführung.\",\n    \"Ablehnung einer „Nationalisierung“ der Wahlen durch die Exekutive.\",\n    \"Feststellung, dass eigenmächtige Eingriffe des Präsidenten in Wahlen rechtswidrig und wirkungslos sind.\",\n    \"Hinweis darauf, dass solche Handlungen ein Amtsenthebungsverfahren (Impeachment) nach sich ziehen können.\"\n  ],\n  \"fr_ai_title\": \"Résolution dénonçant le contrôle présidentiel direct sur les élections\",\n  \"fr_summary\": \"Ce document s'oppose aux tentatives du président de prendre le contrôle direct de l'organisation des élections, protégeant ainsi le rôle des autorités locales. Il garantit que les règles de vote restent définies par les États et non par une décision unilatérale du pouvoir exécutif.\",\n  \"fr_key_points\": [\n    \"Réaffirmation du pouvoir des États et du Congrès sur l'administration des élections fédérales.\",\n    \"Rejet de toute tentative de « nationalisation » ou de réquisition du processus de vote par le président.\",\n    \"Déclaration que toute autorité unilatérale du président sur les élections est inconstitutionnelle.\",\n    \"Avertissement que l'ingérence présidentielle dans les élections constitue un motif de destitution.\"\n  ],\n  \"es_ai_title\": \"Resolución contra el control presidencial directo sobre las elecciones\",\n  \"es_summary\": \"Este documento rechaza cualquier intento del presidente de tomar el control directo de las elecciones, protegiendo la autoridad de los estados y localidades. Asegura que el proceso de votación siga siendo gestionado de forma descentralizada para proteger la confianza ciudadana.\",\n  \"es_key_points\": [\n    \"Reafirma que los estados y el Congreso tienen la autoridad principal para administrar las elecciones.\",\n    \"Rechaza la idea de una „nacionalización” del voto por parte de la rama ejecutiva.\",\n    \"Establece que cualquier intento de control unilateral por parte del presidente es ilegal y carece de efecto.\",\n    \"Advierte que interferir en las prerrogativas electorales de los estados es motivo de juicio político y destitución.\"\n  ],\n  \"it_ai_title\": \"Risoluzione contro il controllo presidenziale diretto sulle elezioni\",\n  \"it_summary\": \"Questo documento si oppone ai tentativi del Presidente di assumere il controllo diretto delle elezioni, tutelando l'autonomia degli Stati e delle autorità locali. Garantisce che le procedure di voto rimangano protette da interferenze unilaterali del governo centrale.\",\n  \"it_key_points\": [\n    \"Conferma che la gestione delle elezioni spetta agli Stati e al Congresso, non al Presidente.\",\n    \"Respinge l'ipotesi di una „nazionalizzazione” o di un sequestro dei processi elettorali da parte dell'esecutivo.\",\n    \"Dichiara che l'esercizio di autorità unilaterale sulle elezioni è incostituzionale e privo di effetti legali.\",\n    \"Afferma che tali condotte costituiscono motivi per l'impeachment e la rimozione dall'incarico.\"\n  ],\n  \"nl_ai_title\": \"Resolutie tegen presidentiële controle over staats- en lokale verkiezingen\",\n  \"nl_summary\": \"Dit document verzet zich tegen pogingen van de president om de directe controle over verkiezingen over te nemen, waardoor de macht van staten behouden blijft. Het beschermt de manier waarop burgers stemmen tegen ongeoorloofde federale inmenging.\",\n  \"nl_key_points\": [\n    \"Bevestigt dat de staten en het Congres verantwoordelijk zijn voor de organisatie van verkiezingen.\",\n    \"Verwerpt het idee van een federale overname of „nationalisering” van het stemproces door de president.\",\n    \"Stelt dat eenzijdige presidentiële controle over verkiezingen ongrondwettelijk en zonder rechtsgevolg is.\",\n    \"Bepaalt dat pogingen om de verkiezingen te controleren grond zijn voor afzetting (impeachment).\"\n  ],\n  \"pt_ai_title\": \"Resolução contra o controlo presidencial direto sobre as eleições\",\n  \"pt_summary\": \"Este documento opõe-se às tentativas do Presidente de assumir o controlo direto das eleições, protegendo a autoridade dos estados e municípios. Garante que as regras de votação continuem a ser geridas localmente, sem interferência ilegal do poder executivo.\",\n  \"pt_key_points\": [\n    \"Reafirma que os estados e o Congresso detêm o poder primário de administrar as eleições federais.\",\n    \"Rejeita qualquer proposta de „nacionalização” ou tomada de controlo do processo de votação pelo Presidente.\",\n    \"Declara que o exercício de autoridade unilateral sobre as eleições é inconstitucional e sem efeito legal.\",\n    \"Alerta que a tentativa de usurpar poderes eleitorais constitui motivo para destituição (impeachment).\"\n  ],\n  \"category\": [\"Courts and Law\"]\n}"
    }
  ]
}