{
  "legislationId": "119_HRES_1193",
  "lastUpdate": "2026-04-22T11:15:08.212Z",
  "history": [
    {
      "timestamp": "2026-04-22T11:15:08.212Z",
      "source_url": "https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/hres1193/BILLS-119hres1193ih.htm",
      "model": "gemini-flash-lite-latest",
      "prompt_sent": "\nROLE: Fact Checker.\nZADANIE: Porównaj SOURCE (oryginał) i SUMMARY (streszczenie przygotowane przez inne AI).\n\nTwoim celem jest wykrycie \"ZMYŚLONYCH KONKRETÓW\" (Fabricated Entities) w SUMMARY.\n\nSOURCE:\n[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H. Res. 1193 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. RES. 1193 Providing for the expulsion of Representative Cory Mills from the United States House of Representatives. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 20, 2026 Ms. Mace submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ethics _______________________________________________________________________ RESOLUTION Providing for the expulsion of Representative Cory Mills from the United States House of Representatives. Whereas, on February 19, 2025, Washington, DC, Metropolitan Police Department officers were called to resolve a private matter at Representative Cory Mills's residence, where officers were called to the 1300 block of Maryland Avenue, Southwest around 1:15 p.m. for the report of an assault; Whereas police reports obtained by NBC4 Washington confirmed that the Washington, DC, Metropolitan Police Department was investigating Representative Cory Mills for an alleged assault of a 27-year-old woman that took place on February 19, 2025, at the residence of Representative Cory Mills; Whereas the first police report, provided to NBC4 Washington by a source and confirmed by a second source familiar with the investigation, said that the 27-year-old woman accused her significant other for over a year of having grabbed her, shoved her, and pushed her out of the door, and also said that the woman involved showed the officer ``bruises on her arm which appeared fresh''; Whereas NBC4 Washington also reported that the Metropolitan Police Department identified Representative Cory Mills as the significant other of the alleged victim of assault--which alleged victim was a 27-year-old woman who was not the wife of Representative Cory Mills--and that the alleged victim ``let officers hear Subject 1 [now identified by MPD as Representative Cory Mills] instruct her to lie about the origin of her bruises . . . Eventually, Subject 1 made contact with police and admitted that the situation escalated from verbal to physical, but it was severe enough to create bruising''; Whereas, on February 21, 2025, the Washington Post also confirmed two DC police officials said that the alleged victim of assault initially told a 911 operator and police that she had been assaulted and that officers said she also had what seemed to be visible injuries, and that while a supervisor initially classified the offense internally as a family disturbance, police commanders later learned of the incident, reviewed the reports and body camera footage from the responding officers, and reclassified the case as a domestic violence assault; Whereas, on February 21, 2025, NBC4 Washington also reported that the Metropolitan Police Department determined that probable cause to arrest Representative Cory Mills for misdemeanor assault existed and sent an arrest warrant for Representative Cory Mills to the United States Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia; Whereas, on April 18, 2026, the Washington Post reported body-camera footage and documents show the alleged victim had noticeable injuries to the lower part of her right eye and ``injuries/bruises to her arms consistent with signs of a physical assault'', and the alleged victim stated the man who attacked her, who she later identified as Representative Cory Mills, was ``a prominent person'' who ``has suddenly become very abusive''; Whereas, on April 18, 2026, the Washington Post reported body-camera footage and documents show Representative Cory Mills instructed the alleged victim to explain the injuries she sustained by telling law enforcement they ``were from our vacation and that I bruise easily'' and later Representative Cory Mills told police he wanted to call Pam Bondi, who at the time was serving as Attorney General of the United States; Whereas, on July 14, 2025, a different former romantic partner of Representative Cory Mills, who was apparently in a relationship with Representative Mills from November 2021 to February 2025, reported to authorities in Florida that Representative Mills threatened to release nude images and other intimate videos of her and threatened to harm her future romantic partners in retaliation for her decision to end a relationship with Representative Mills after seeing the public reports described above concerning the alleged February 2025 physical assault; Whereas, on October 14, 2025, the Circuit Court of the Third Judicial Circuit in Columbia County, Florida, issued a Final Judgment of Injunction for Protection Against Dating Violence against Representative Cory Mills, based on a finding that his former romantic partner was a victim of dating violence or had reasonable cause to believe she was in imminent danger of becoming a victim of another an act of dating violence; Whereas, in the Final Judgment of Injunction for Protection Against Dating Violence against Representative Cory Mills, the Circuit Court of the Third Judicial Circuit in Columbia County, Florida found Representative Cory Mills acknowledged sending electronic messages, which included ``May want to tell every guy you date that if we run into each other at any point. Strap up cowboy'' and ``You want to date or be with someone else. Be my guest. But they need to know well in advance that if we cross paths, I don't care this week, this month, or this decade. They better damn well know it's coming every time''; Whereas, in the Final Judgment of Injunction for Protection Against Dating Violence against Representative Cory Mills, the Circuit Court of the Third Judicial Circuit in Columbia County, Florida found Representative Cory Mills acknowledged sending electronic messages, which included ``I can send him a few videos of you as well[.] Oh I still have them[.]'' and ``Thanks again for the videos''; Whereas, in the Final Judgment of Injunction for Protection Against Dating Violence against Representative Cory Mills, the Circuit Court of the Third Judicial Circuit in Columbia County, Florida found ``The Respondent [Representative Cory Mills] acknowledged the Petitioner requested he `please' leave her alone on May 22, 2025. Despite this request, the Respondent [Representative Cory Mills] continued to send electronic messages to the Petitioner through June 2025, ignoring her eleven (11) separate requests to be left alone''; Whereas, in the Final Judgment of Injunction for Protection Against Dating Violence against Representative Cory Mills, the Circuit Court of the Third Judicial Circuit in Columbia County, Florida found ``Petitioner testified, and the evidence supported, the Respondent's [Representative Cory Mills'] communications caused her substantial emotional distress considering her professional commitments. She described herself as being physically ill, curled in the fetal position requiring family assistance, suffering hives, seeking professional therapy, and being prescribed Xanax and Lexapro, which she took on multiple occasions due to the Respondent's [Representative Cory Mills'] actions'', and that ``she altered her daily routine out of fear, impairing her ability to perform her job duties and to live a normal life''; Whereas, in the Final Judgment of Injunction for Protection Against Dating Violence against Representative Cory Mills, the Circuit Court of the Third Judicial Circuit in Columbia County, Florida found that after Representative Cory Mills learned of the Petitioner's attempts to seek an injunction for protection, he used the phone of the alleged victim of the February 19, 2025, assault to contact the Petitioner, caused the alleged victim of the February 19, 2025, domestic assault to contact her, contacted her family members, and ``caused a public employee under his direct supervision to contact'' her; Whereas, prior to serving in the House of Representatives, Representative Cory Mills founded Pacem Solutions International LLC and Pacem Defense LLC, and acquired AMTEC Corporation (now renamed as ALS, Inc.), companies which engage in security and military contracting with the United States Government as well as foreign nations; Whereas, in August 2024, the Office of Congressional Conduct found ``from January 2023 to present, Pacem Defense/ALS, has been actively contracting with the Federal Government, securing close to $1,000,000 in Federal contracts for munitions and weapons, distributed to prisons across the country. Specifically, since January 9, 2024, 94 contracts have been awarded to entities owned by Rep. Mills'' and went on to conclude ``there is substantial reason to believe that Rep. Mills may have entered into, held, or enjoyed contracts with Federal agencies while he was a Member of Congress in violation of House rules, standards of conduct, and Federal law''; Whereas, in August 2024, the Office of Congressional Conduct noted ``According to its website, Pacem Solutions is currently registered and/or partnered with trusted local firms to work in the following countries: United States, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, UAE, Australia, Kenya, Malaysia and Kuwait.'' Public reports indicate companies owned by Representative Cory Mills sought, or entered into contracts, to sell munitions to foreign nations while serving as a member of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee on Armed Services--representing a clear and troubling conflict of interest; Whereas, in August 2024, the Office of Congressional Conduct adopted and transmitted to the Committee on Ethics of the House of Representatives a report indicating that there was substantial reason to believe that Representative Cory Mills may have omitted or misrepresented required information in his financial disclosure statements, accepted excessive contributions to his campaign committee in the form of personal loans and contributions that may not have derived from Representative Cory Mills' personal funds, and entered into, enjoyed, or held contracts with Federal agencies; Whereas individuals who served in the military with Representative Cory Mills have called into question the veracity of the account of events which formed the basis of a recommendation that Representative Cory Mills receive an award of a Bronze Star, bestowed in 2021, for his service under enemy fire in Iraq in 2003; Whereas, in August 2024, Representative Cory Mills provided the Daytona Beach News with documents purporting to prove that he earned a Bronze Star with heroism, including a Department of the Army Form 638 recommending Representative Cory Mills for a Bronze Star which includes a signature from then-Army Brigade Commander Arnold N. Gordon-Bray; Whereas Retired Brigadier General Arnold N. Gordon-Bray has stated he did not personally write, read, or sign the Department of the Army Form 638 recommending Representative Cory Mills for a Bronze Star; Whereas five people who served with Representative Cory Mills, including two men who were reported as having been personally saved by Representative Cory Mills at great risk to his own life as a basis for the recommendation for his Bronze Star in the Department of the Army Form 638, disputed that Representative Cory Mills was involved in their rescue or provided life-saving care; Whereas one Private First Class cited as having been involved in one of the listed achievements on Representative Cory Mills's Army Form 638 recommending him for a Bronze Star denied that Representative Cory Mills provided him any aid and also denied that his injuries were life threatening; Whereas one Sergeant cited as having been involved in one of the listed achievements on Representative Cory Mills's Army Form 638 recommending him for a Bronze Star called the account a ``fabrication'' and claimed that he ``was not involved in any claims that Cory Mills makes about me''; Whereas Representative Cory Mills's employment application to DynCorp Internation al stated he served in the United States Army 75th Ranger Regiment and attended United States Army Sniper School, claims which are not corroborated by his military records; and Whereas such conduct by Representative Cory Mills affects the dignity and integrity of the proceedings of the House and brings discredit upon the House: Now, therefore, be it Resolved, That pursuant to article I, section 5, clause 2 of the Constitution of the United States, Representative Cory Mills, be, and he hereby is, expelled from the United States House of Representatives. <all>\n\nSUMMARY TO EVALUATE:\nTitle: Resolution to expel Representative Cory Mills from the House of Representatives\nSummary: This resolution seeks to remove Cory Mills from Congress following serious allegations of domestic violence, financial conflicts of interest, and falsified military records. It aims to uphold the integrity of the House by holding representatives accountable for illegal and unethical conduct.\nKey Points: Allegations of physical assault and harassment, including threats to release intimate videos of a former partner., Holding prohibited government contracts and selling munitions to foreign nations while serving in Congress., Discrepancies in military service claims, including a disputed Bronze Star and unverified special forces training., Violation of House ethics and public trust through misrepresentation in financial disclosure statements.\n\nZASADY OCENY:\n1. Sprawdź wszystkie LICZBY, DATY i KWOTY w SUMMARY. Jeśli którejś brakuje w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n2. Sprawdź wszystkie NAZWISKA, ORGANIZACJE i MIEJSCA w SUMMARY. Jeśli którejś brakuje w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n3. Sprawdź wszystkie konkretne DZIAŁANIA PRAWNE . Jeśli tego mechanizmu nie ma w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n\nWAŻNE: Abstrakcyjne pojęcia (np. \"transparentność\", \"zaufanie\") są dozwolone jako wnioski.\n\nOUTPUT (JSON):\n{\n  \"is_valid\": true/false,\n  \"issue\": \"fabricated_entity\" / \"contradiction\" / \"none\"\n}\n\nWYMAGANIA FORMATOWANIA:\n1. Odpowiedz WYŁĄCZNIE surowym obiektem JSON.\n2. NIE używaj bloków kodu Markdown.\n3. NIE dodawaj żadnych wstępów ani wyjaśnień przed ani po JSONie.\n4. JSON musi być poprawny i gotowy do parsowania.\n\n",
      "ai_response_raw": "{\n  \"is_valid\": true,\n  \"issue\": \"none\"\n}"
    },
    {
      "timestamp": "2026-04-22T11:10:53.292Z",
      "source_url": "https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/hres1193/BILLS-119hres1193ih.htm",
      "model": "gemini-flash-latest",
      "prompt_sent": "\nJesteś ekspertem od prawa Stanów Zjednoczonych, który ma za zadanie analizować dokumenty ustaw, uchwał oraz innych dokumentów legislacyjnych, a następnie przygotowywać z nich informacje w przystępny sposób dla obywateli. Twoim celem jest przedstawienie informacji tak, aby obywatele mogli sami ocenić wpływ legislacji na ich życie, nawet bez posiadania specjalistycznej wiedzy legislacyjnej. Skup się na faktach i obiektywnych skutkach wprowadzanych zmian, unikając wartościowania i osobistych opinii. Wszelki żargon prawny jest zabroniony. Prezentuj informacje w jasny, zwięzły i angażujący sposób, tak aby były zrozumiałe dla osoby bez wykształcenia prawniczego. Unikaj długich, złożonych zdań. Zamiast pisać \"projekt ma na celu nowelizację kodeksu podatkowego...\", napisz \"Zmiany w podatkach: nowe ulgi i obowiązki dla...\". Kontynuuj swoją pracę, dopóki nie rozwiążesz swojego zadania. Jeśli nie masz pewności co do generowanej treści, przeanalizuj dokument ponownie – nie zgaduj. Rozplanuj dobrze swoje zadanie przed przystąpieniem do niego. W podsumowaniu i kluczowych punktach, jeśli to możliwe i uzasadnione, podkreśl, jakie konkretne korzyści lub skutki (pozytywne lub negatywne) wprowadza ustawa dla życia codziennego obywateli, ich praw i obowiązków, finansów osobistych, bezpieczeństwa i innych ważnych kwestii (np. kategorycznych zakazów i nakazów czy najważniejszych konkretnych alokacji finansowych i terytorialnych).\n\nTwoja odpowiedź MUSI być w formacie JSON - i zawierać następujące klucze.\nZanim zwrócisz odpowiedź, dokładnie zweryfikuj, czy cała struktura JSON jest w 100% poprawna, włącznie ze wszystkimi przecinkami, nawiasami klamrowymi, kwadratowymi oraz cudzysłowami. Błędny JSON jest nieakceptowalny i uniemożliwi przetworzenie Twojej pracy.\n\nPrzeanalizuj dokładnie poniższy tekst dokumentu prawnego. To jest treść, na podstawie której masz wygenerować podsumowanie i kluczowe punkty:\n--- POCZĄTEK DOKUMENTU ---\n[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H. Res. 1193 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. RES. 1193 Providing for the expulsion of Representative Cory Mills from the United States House of Representatives. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 20, 2026 Ms. Mace submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ethics _______________________________________________________________________ RESOLUTION Providing for the expulsion of Representative Cory Mills from the United States House of Representatives. Whereas, on February 19, 2025, Washington, DC, Metropolitan Police Department officers were called to resolve a private matter at Representative Cory Mills's residence, where officers were called to the 1300 block of Maryland Avenue, Southwest around 1:15 p.m. for the report of an assault; Whereas police reports obtained by NBC4 Washington confirmed that the Washington, DC, Metropolitan Police Department was investigating Representative Cory Mills for an alleged assault of a 27-year-old woman that took place on February 19, 2025, at the residence of Representative Cory Mills; Whereas the first police report, provided to NBC4 Washington by a source and confirmed by a second source familiar with the investigation, said that the 27-year-old woman accused her significant other for over a year of having grabbed her, shoved her, and pushed her out of the door, and also said that the woman involved showed the officer ``bruises on her arm which appeared fresh''; Whereas NBC4 Washington also reported that the Metropolitan Police Department identified Representative Cory Mills as the significant other of the alleged victim of assault--which alleged victim was a 27-year-old woman who was not the wife of Representative Cory Mills--and that the alleged victim ``let officers hear Subject 1 [now identified by MPD as Representative Cory Mills] instruct her to lie about the origin of her bruises . . . Eventually, Subject 1 made contact with police and admitted that the situation escalated from verbal to physical, but it was severe enough to create bruising''; Whereas, on February 21, 2025, the Washington Post also confirmed two DC police officials said that the alleged victim of assault initially told a 911 operator and police that she had been assaulted and that officers said she also had what seemed to be visible injuries, and that while a supervisor initially classified the offense internally as a family disturbance, police commanders later learned of the incident, reviewed the reports and body camera footage from the responding officers, and reclassified the case as a domestic violence assault; Whereas, on February 21, 2025, NBC4 Washington also reported that the Metropolitan Police Department determined that probable cause to arrest Representative Cory Mills for misdemeanor assault existed and sent an arrest warrant for Representative Cory Mills to the United States Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia; Whereas, on April 18, 2026, the Washington Post reported body-camera footage and documents show the alleged victim had noticeable injuries to the lower part of her right eye and ``injuries/bruises to her arms consistent with signs of a physical assault'', and the alleged victim stated the man who attacked her, who she later identified as Representative Cory Mills, was ``a prominent person'' who ``has suddenly become very abusive''; Whereas, on April 18, 2026, the Washington Post reported body-camera footage and documents show Representative Cory Mills instructed the alleged victim to explain the injuries she sustained by telling law enforcement they ``were from our vacation and that I bruise easily'' and later Representative Cory Mills told police he wanted to call Pam Bondi, who at the time was serving as Attorney General of the United States; Whereas, on July 14, 2025, a different former romantic partner of Representative Cory Mills, who was apparently in a relationship with Representative Mills from November 2021 to February 2025, reported to authorities in Florida that Representative Mills threatened to release nude images and other intimate videos of her and threatened to harm her future romantic partners in retaliation for her decision to end a relationship with Representative Mills after seeing the public reports described above concerning the alleged February 2025 physical assault; Whereas, on October 14, 2025, the Circuit Court of the Third Judicial Circuit in Columbia County, Florida, issued a Final Judgment of Injunction for Protection Against Dating Violence against Representative Cory Mills, based on a finding that his former romantic partner was a victim of dating violence or had reasonable cause to believe she was in imminent danger of becoming a victim of another an act of dating violence; Whereas, in the Final Judgment of Injunction for Protection Against Dating Violence against Representative Cory Mills, the Circuit Court of the Third Judicial Circuit in Columbia County, Florida found Representative Cory Mills acknowledged sending electronic messages, which included ``May want to tell every guy you date that if we run into each other at any point. Strap up cowboy'' and ``You want to date or be with someone else. Be my guest. But they need to know well in advance that if we cross paths, I don't care this week, this month, or this decade. They better damn well know it's coming every time''; Whereas, in the Final Judgment of Injunction for Protection Against Dating Violence against Representative Cory Mills, the Circuit Court of the Third Judicial Circuit in Columbia County, Florida found Representative Cory Mills acknowledged sending electronic messages, which included ``I can send him a few videos of you as well[.] Oh I still have them[.]'' and ``Thanks again for the videos''; Whereas, in the Final Judgment of Injunction for Protection Against Dating Violence against Representative Cory Mills, the Circuit Court of the Third Judicial Circuit in Columbia County, Florida found ``The Respondent [Representative Cory Mills] acknowledged the Petitioner requested he `please' leave her alone on May 22, 2025. Despite this request, the Respondent [Representative Cory Mills] continued to send electronic messages to the Petitioner through June 2025, ignoring her eleven (11) separate requests to be left alone''; Whereas, in the Final Judgment of Injunction for Protection Against Dating Violence against Representative Cory Mills, the Circuit Court of the Third Judicial Circuit in Columbia County, Florida found ``Petitioner testified, and the evidence supported, the Respondent's [Representative Cory Mills'] communications caused her substantial emotional distress considering her professional commitments. She described herself as being physically ill, curled in the fetal position requiring family assistance, suffering hives, seeking professional therapy, and being prescribed Xanax and Lexapro, which she took on multiple occasions due to the Respondent's [Representative Cory Mills'] actions'', and that ``she altered her daily routine out of fear, impairing her ability to perform her job duties and to live a normal life''; Whereas, in the Final Judgment of Injunction for Protection Against Dating Violence against Representative Cory Mills, the Circuit Court of the Third Judicial Circuit in Columbia County, Florida found that after Representative Cory Mills learned of the Petitioner's attempts to seek an injunction for protection, he used the phone of the alleged victim of the February 19, 2025, assault to contact the Petitioner, caused the alleged victim of the February 19, 2025, domestic assault to contact her, contacted her family members, and ``caused a public employee under his direct supervision to contact'' her; Whereas, prior to serving in the House of Representatives, Representative Cory Mills founded Pacem Solutions International LLC and Pacem Defense LLC, and acquired AMTEC Corporation (now renamed as ALS, Inc.), companies which engage in security and military contracting with the United States Government as well as foreign nations; Whereas, in August 2024, the Office of Congressional Conduct found ``from January 2023 to present, Pacem Defense/ALS, has been actively contracting with the Federal Government, securing close to $1,000,000 in Federal contracts for munitions and weapons, distributed to prisons across the country. Specifically, since January 9, 2024, 94 contracts have been awarded to entities owned by Rep. Mills'' and went on to conclude ``there is substantial reason to believe that Rep. Mills may have entered into, held, or enjoyed contracts with Federal agencies while he was a Member of Congress in violation of House rules, standards of conduct, and Federal law''; Whereas, in August 2024, the Office of Congressional Conduct noted ``According to its website, Pacem Solutions is currently registered and/or partnered with trusted local firms to work in the following countries: United States, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, UAE, Australia, Kenya, Malaysia and Kuwait.'' Public reports indicate companies owned by Representative Cory Mills sought, or entered into contracts, to sell munitions to foreign nations while serving as a member of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee on Armed Services--representing a clear and troubling conflict of interest; Whereas, in August 2024, the Office of Congressional Conduct adopted and transmitted to the Committee on Ethics of the House of Representatives a report indicating that there was substantial reason to believe that Representative Cory Mills may have omitted or misrepresented required information in his financial disclosure statements, accepted excessive contributions to his campaign committee in the form of personal loans and contributions that may not have derived from Representative Cory Mills' personal funds, and entered into, enjoyed, or held contracts with Federal agencies; Whereas individuals who served in the military with Representative Cory Mills have called into question the veracity of the account of events which formed the basis of a recommendation that Representative Cory Mills receive an award of a Bronze Star, bestowed in 2021, for his service under enemy fire in Iraq in 2003; Whereas, in August 2024, Representative Cory Mills provided the Daytona Beach News with documents purporting to prove that he earned a Bronze Star with heroism, including a Department of the Army Form 638 recommending Representative Cory Mills for a Bronze Star which includes a signature from then-Army Brigade Commander Arnold N. Gordon-Bray; Whereas Retired Brigadier General Arnold N. Gordon-Bray has stated he did not personally write, read, or sign the Department of the Army Form 638 recommending Representative Cory Mills for a Bronze Star; Whereas five people who served with Representative Cory Mills, including two men who were reported as having been personally saved by Representative Cory Mills at great risk to his own life as a basis for the recommendation for his Bronze Star in the Department of the Army Form 638, disputed that Representative Cory Mills was involved in their rescue or provided life-saving care; Whereas one Private First Class cited as having been involved in one of the listed achievements on Representative Cory Mills's Army Form 638 recommending him for a Bronze Star denied that Representative Cory Mills provided him any aid and also denied that his injuries were life threatening; Whereas one Sergeant cited as having been involved in one of the listed achievements on Representative Cory Mills's Army Form 638 recommending him for a Bronze Star called the account a ``fabrication'' and claimed that he ``was not involved in any claims that Cory Mills makes about me''; Whereas Representative Cory Mills's employment application to DynCorp Internation al stated he served in the United States Army 75th Ranger Regiment and attended United States Army Sniper School, claims which are not corroborated by his military records; and Whereas such conduct by Representative Cory Mills affects the dignity and integrity of the proceedings of the House and brings discredit upon the House: Now, therefore, be it Resolved, That pursuant to article I, section 5, clause 2 of the Constitution of the United States, Representative Cory Mills, be, and he hereby is, expelled from the United States House of Representatives. <all>\n--- KONIEC DOKUMENTU ---\n\nPAMIĘTAJ: Twoja odpowiedź MUSI być wyłącznie poprawnym obiektem JSON. Nie dodawaj żadnych dodatkowych znaków, komentarzy ani tekstu przed znacznikiem '{' ani po znaczniku '}'. Cała odpowiedź musi być parsowalna jako JSON.\nNa podstawie POWYŻSZEGO dokumentu, wypełnij poniższą strukturę JSON:\nOto struktura JSON, której oczekuję (wypełnij ją treścią):\n{\n  \"pl_ai_title\": \"Nowy, krótki tytuł dla aktu prawnego po polsku, oddający sedno wprowadzanych zmian (np. maksymalnie 10-12 słów).\",\n  \"pl_summary\": \"2-3 zdania zwięzłego podsumowania treści aktu prawnego po polsku, napisane z perspektywy wpływu na życie codzienne obywateli.\",\n  \"pl_key_points\": [\n    \"Pierwszy krótki punkt po polsku dotyczący najważniejszych wprowadzanych rozwiązań lub zmian.\",\n    \"Drugi krótki punkt po polsku...\"\n  ],\n  \"eng_ai_title\": \"A new, short title for the legal act in English, capturing the essence of the changes (e.g., max 10-12 words).\",\n  \"eng_summary\": \"2-3 sentences summarizing the legal act in English, from the perspective of its impact on citizens' daily lives.\",\n  \"eng_key_points\": [\n    \"First short bullet point in English regarding the most important solutions or changes being introduced.\",\n    \"Second short bullet point in English...\"\n  ],\n  \"de_ai_title\": \"Ein neuer, kurzer Titel für das Rechtsdokument auf Deutsch, der den Kern der Änderungen erfasst (z.B. max. 10-12 Wörter).\",\n  \"de_summary\": \"2-3 Sätze Zusammenfassung des Rechtsdokuments auf Deutsch, aus der Perspektive seiner Auswirkungen auf das tägliche Leben der Bürger.\",\n  \"de_key_points\": [\n    \"Erster kurzer Stichpunkt auf Deutsch zu den wichtigsten eingeführten Lösungen oder Änderungen.\",\n    \"Zweiter kurzer Stichpunkt auf Deutsch...\"\n  ],\n  \"fr_ai_title\": \"Un nouveau titre court pour l'acte juridique en français, saisissant l'essence des changements (par exemple, 10-12 mots maximum).\",\n  \"fr_summary\": \"Résumé de 2-3 phrases de l'acte juridique en français, du point de vue de son impact sur la vie quotidienne des citoyens.\",\n  \"fr_key_points\": [\n    \"Premier court point en français concernant les solutions ou changements les plus importants introduits.\",\n    \"Deuxième court point en français...\"\n  ],\n  \"es_ai_title\": \"Un nuevo título breve para el acto jurídico en español, que recoja la esencia de los cambios (por ejemplo, máximo 10-12 palabras).\",\n  \"es_summary\": \"Resumen de 2-3 frases del acto jurídico en español, desde la perspectiva de su impacto en la vida cotidiana de los ciudadanos.\",\n  \"es_key_points\": [\n    \"Primer punto breve en español sobre las soluciones o cambios más importantes que se introducen.\",\n    \"Segundo punto breve en español...\"\n  ],\n  \"it_ai_title\": \"Un nuovo titolo breve per l'atto giuridico in italiano, che colga l'essenza delle modifiche (ad es. massimo 10-12 parole).\",\n  \"it_summary\": \"Riepilogo di 2-3 frasi dell'atto giuridico in italiano, dal punto di vista del suo impatto sulla vita quotidiana dei cittadini.\",\n  \"it_key_points\": [\n    \"Primo breve punto in italiano riguardante le soluzioni o le modifiche più importanti introdotte.\",\n    \"Secondo breve punto in italiano...\"\n  ],\n  \"nl_ai_title\": \"Een nieuwe, korte titel voor de rechtshandeling in het Nederlands, die de essentie van de wijzigingen weergeeft (bijv. max. 10-12 woorden).\",\n  \"nl_summary\": \"Samenvatting van 2-3 zinnen van de rechtshandeling in het Nederlands, vanuit het perspectief van de impact op het dagelijks leven van burgers.\",\n  \"nl_key_points\": [\n    \"Eerste korte punt in het Nederlands betreffende de belangrijkste geïntroduceerde oplossingen of wijzigingen.\",\n    \"Tweede korte punt in het Nederlands...\"\n  ],\n  \"pt_ai_title\": \"Um novo título curto para o ato jurídico em português, capturando a essência das mudanças (por exemplo, máx. 10-12 palavras).\",\n  \"pt_summary\": \"Resumo de 2-3 frases do ato jurídico em português, na perspetiva do seu impacto na vida quotidiana dos cidadãos.\",\n  \"pt_key_points\": [\n    \"Primeiro ponto curto em português sobre as soluções ou alterações mais importantes introduzidas.\",\n    \"Segundo ponto curto em português...\"\n  ],\n  \"category\": [\"Categorize the document into one category by default, based on the field it primarily concerns. Choose up to 3 if the document also touches upon SIGNIFICANT issues from other categories. You MUST select categories ONLY from the following list: Health, Education, Family, Taxes, Labor, Security, Environment, Courts and Law, Transport, Benefits, Real Estate, Media and Culture, Local Government, Migration, Agriculture, Public Investments, Informatization, Economy. If the document does not definitively fit any of these, you MUST use \"Other\". If you use \"Other\", it should be the ONLY category selected. Do NOT invent new categories. The response must be an array of strings, e.g., [\"Taxes\", \"Family\"].\"]\n}\n\n",
      "ai_response_raw": "{\n  \"pl_ai_title\": \"Rezolucja w sprawie usunięcia kongresmena Cory'ego Millsa z Izby Reprezentantów\",\n  \"pl_summary\": \"Dokument ten ma na celu usunięcie Cory'ego Millsa z Kongresu USA w związku z licznymi oskarżeniami o przemoc domową, nielegalne kontrakty finansowe oraz kłamstwa dotyczące służby wojskowej. Działanie to ma na celu ochronę uczciwości instytucji publicznych i zapewnienie, że przedstawiciele narodu przestrzegają prawa.\",\n  \"pl_key_points\": [\n    \"Oskarżenia o napaść fizyczną na kobietę oraz zastraszanie byłej partnerki groźbami udostępnienia intymnych nagrań.\",\n    \"Prowadzenie interesów z rządem federalnym i sprzedaż broni obcym państwom podczas pełnienia mandatu kongresmena.\",\n    \"Podejrzenie sfałszowania dokumentacji wojskowej, w tym bezpodstawne przypisanie sobie odznaczenia Brązowej Gwiazdy.\",\n    \"Naruszenie zasad etyki i godności Izby Reprezentantów poprzez składanie fałszywych oświadczeń majątkowych.\"\n  ],\n  \"eng_ai_title\": \"Resolution to expel Representative Cory Mills from the House of Representatives\",\n  \"eng_summary\": \"This resolution seeks to remove Cory Mills from Congress following serious allegations of domestic violence, financial conflicts of interest, and falsified military records. It aims to uphold the integrity of the House by holding representatives accountable for illegal and unethical conduct.\",\n  \"eng_key_points\": [\n    \"Allegations of physical assault and harassment, including threats to release intimate videos of a former partner.\",\n    \"Holding prohibited government contracts and selling munitions to foreign nations while serving in Congress.\",\n    \"Discrepancies in military service claims, including a disputed Bronze Star and unverified special forces training.\",\n    \"Violation of House ethics and public trust through misrepresentation in financial disclosure statements.\"\n  ],\n  \"de_ai_title\": \"Resolution zum Ausschluss des Abgeordneten Cory Mills aus dem Repräsentantenhaus\",\n  \"de_summary\": \"Diese Resolution fordert den Ausschluss von Cory Mills aus dem US-Kongress aufgrund von Vorwürfen häuslicher Gewalt, finanzieller Interessenkonflikte und gefälschter Militäraufzeichnungen. Ziel ist es, die Integrität des Parlaments zu wahren und Abgeordnete für rechtswidriges Verhalten zur Rechenschaft zu ziehen.\",\n  \"de_key_points\": [\n    \"Vorwürfe der körperlichen Misshandlung und Einschüchterung von Frauen durch Drohungen mit intimen Aufnahmen.\",\n    \"Unzulässige Regierungsverträge und Waffenverkäufe an das Ausland während der Ausübung des Abgeordnetenmandats.\",\n    \"Zweifel an der Echtheit militärischer Auszeichnungen, insbesondere des Bronze Star, und falsche Angaben zum Werdegang.\",\n    \"Verstoß gegen ethische Standards und das Ansehen des Hauses durch falsche Angaben in Finanzberichten.\"\n  ],\n  \"fr_ai_title\": \"Résolution visant à expulser le représentant Cory Mills de la Chambre des représentants\",\n  \"fr_summary\": \"Cette résolution vise à révoquer Cory Mills du Congrès suite à des accusations de violence domestique, de conflits d'intérêts financiers et de falsification de dossiers militaires. Elle vise à protéger l'intégrité de l'institution en sanctionnant les comportements illégaux.\",\n  \"fr_key_points\": [\n    \"Accusations d'agression physique et de harcèlement, incluant des menaces de diffuser des vidéos intimes d'une ex-partenaire.\",\n    \"Détention de contrats fédéraux et vente de munitions à l'étranger tout en siégeant dans des commissions parlementaires clés.\",\n    \"Contestation de ses états de service militaire, notamment l'obtention d'une Bronze Star et sa formation de tireur d'élite.\",\n    \"Atteinte à la dignité de la Chambre par des omissions et des fausses déclarations financières.\"\n  ],\n  \"es_ai_title\": \"Resolución para expulsar al representante Cory Mills de la Cámara de Representantes\",\n  \"es_summary\": \"Esta resolución busca destituir a Cory Mills del Congreso tras denuncias de violencia doméstica, conflictos de intereses financieros y falsificación de registros militares. El objetivo es mantener la integridad de la Cámara y la confianza pública en sus miembros.\",\n  \"es_key_points\": [\n    \"Acusaciones de agresión física y amenazas de difundir imágenes íntimas contra ex parejas sentimentales.\",\n    \"Participación en contratos gubernamentales y venta de armas a naciones extranjeras siendo miembro del Congreso.\",\n    \"Dudas sobre la veracidad de sus condecoraciones militares, incluyendo una Estrella de Bronce supuestamente fabricada.\",\n    \"Violación de las normas éticas mediante la omisión de información requerida en sus declaraciones financieras.\"\n  ],\n  \"it_ai_title\": \"Risoluzione per l'espulsione del rappresentante Cory Mills dalla Camera dei Rappresentanti\",\n  \"it_summary\": \"Questa risoluzione propone la rimozione di Cory Mills dal Congresso a causa di accuse di violenza domestica, conflitti di interesse finanziari e falsificazione di documenti militari. L'atto mira a preservare l'onore dell'istituzione parlamentare.\",\n  \"it_key_points\": [\n    \"Accuse di aggressione fisica e stalking, con minacce di pubblicare video intimi di una ex partner.\",\n    \"Gestione di contratti federali e vendita di armi a paesi stranieri durante il mandato parlamentare.\",\n    \"Incongruenze nei documenti relativi al servizio militare e alle medaglie, come la Bronze Star contestata dai commilitoni.\",\n    \"Violazione dei codici etici e della dignità della Camera attraverso dichiarazioni finanziarie mendaci.\"\n  ],\n  \"nl_ai_title\": \"Resolutie tot uitzetting van afgevaardigde Cory Mills uit het Huis van Afgevaardigden\",\n  \"nl_summary\": \"Deze resolutie streeft naar de verwijdering van Cory Mills uit het Congres na beschuldigingen van huiselijk geweld, financiële belangenverstrengeling en vervalste militaire gegevens. Het doel is de integriteit van het Huis te waarborgen.\",\n  \"nl_key_points\": [\n    \"Beschuldigingen van fysieke mishandeling en intimidatie van vrouwen, waaronder dreiging met het verspreiden van intieme beelden.\",\n    \"Betrokkenheid bij overheidscontracten en wapenverkoop aan het buitenland tijdens zijn ambtstermijn.\",\n    \"Twijfels over de echtheid van militaire onderscheidingen en trainingen die niet in zijn officiële dossiers voorkomen.\",\n    \"Schending van ethische regels door het verstrekken van onjuiste informatie in financiële openbaarmakingen.\"\n  ],\n  \"pt_ai_title\": \"Resolução para expulsar o representante Cory Mills da Câmara dos Representantes\",\n  \"pt_summary\": \"Esta resolução visa remover Cory Mills do Congresso após alegações de violência doméstica, conflitos de interesses financeiros e falsificação de registos militares. Procura-se garantir que os representantes mantenham padrões éticos elevados.\",\n  \"pt_key_points\": [\n    \"Acusações de agressão física e assédio, incluindo ameaças de divulgar vídeos íntimos de uma ex-parceira.\",\n    \"Manutenção de contratos federais e venda de munições a nações estrangeiras enquanto exercia o cargo de congressista.\",\n    \"Discrepâncias em relação a medalhas e experiência militar declarada, como a contestada Estrela de Bronze.\",\n    \"Violação da ética parlamentar e da confiança pública através de omissões em declarações financeiras obrigatórias.\"\n  ],\n  \"category\": [\"Courts and Law\"]\n}"
    }
  ]
}