{
  "legislationId": "119_HRES_1197",
  "lastUpdate": "2026-04-21T11:26:27.757Z",
  "history": [
    {
      "timestamp": "2026-04-21T11:26:27.757Z",
      "source_url": "https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/hres1197/BILLS-119hres1197ih.htm",
      "model": "gemini-flash-lite-latest",
      "prompt_sent": "\nROLE: Fact Checker.\nZADANIE: Porównaj SOURCE (oryginał) i SUMMARY (streszczenie przygotowane przez inne AI).\n\nTwoim celem jest wykrycie \"ZMYŚLONYCH KONKRETÓW\" (Fabricated Entities) w SUMMARY.\n\nSOURCE:\n[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H. Res. 1197 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. RES. 1197 Providing for the expulsion of Representative Nancy Mace from the United States House of Representatives. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 20, 2026 Mr. Mills submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ethics _______________________________________________________________________ RESOLUTION Providing for the expulsion of Representative Nancy Mace from the United States House of Representatives. Whereas on November 17, 2025, Patrick Bryant filed a restraining order against Representative Mace in Charleston County Court of Common Pleas, alleging her ongoing public harassment, profanity-laced threats against his attorneys, and dissemination of baseless claims via social media constitute irreparable harm, amid a protracted legal feud involving defamation suits, property disputes, and Representative Mace's accusations of Bryant's abuse; Whereas on November 26, 2025, Judge Donald B. Hocker issued a gag order preventing Representative Mace from publishing, posting, sharing, or creating any public content related to her ongoing lawsuits, after she disrupted the legal process by airing her personal grievances on her official social media and the House Floor; Whereas in a May 2025 deposition, Wesley Donehue, a former political strategist for Representative Nancy Mace, testified under oath that Representative Mace asked him to blackmail her then-fiance, Patrick Bryant, by threatening to publicly release explicit photographs allegedly found on Bryant's phone to secure full ownership of jointly held properties in Washington, D.C., and South Carolina's Isle of Palms, describing the request as an illegal act that prompted him to sever professional ties with her; Whereas Donehue further testified that Representative Mace explicitly claimed to possess evidence that Bryant had sexually assaulted and non-consensually filmed multiple other women, yet Representative Mace knowingly chose to vacation with Bryant on a 2023 Caribbean cruise rather than immediately report these alleged crimes to law enforcement or take any action to protect the identified victims, prioritizing her leisure over the potential sexual exploitation and victimization of other females, conduct that raises grave questions about the credibility, consistency, and moral seriousness of her subsequent public accusations of sexual misconduct against Bryant and others; Whereas on October 31, 2025, an incident report from the Charleston County Aviation Authority Police Department detailed Representative Mace's profane berating of law enforcement officers and Transportation Security Administration (TSA) agents at Charleston International Airport, including repeated use of derogatory language such as calling officers ``fucking incompetent'' and demanding preferential treatment as a ``fucking U.S. representative,'' behavior that shocked witnesses and prompted TSA supervisors to file internal reports; Whereas James A. Woods, Charleston Regional Aviation Authority Chief of Police, stated in a November 12 investigation report that Mace is responsible for turning a ``minor miscommunication'' into ``a spectacle'' through ``continued failure to follow established procedures at the checkpoint'', highlighting her routine and flagrant disregard for airport procedures, entitlement, and mistreatment of staff attempting to accommodate her requests that leave law enforcement and airport employees ``visibly upset'', ``frustrated'', and ``downtrodden''; Whereas Representative Mace gained admission to The Citadel Military College of South Carolina in 1996 through direct nepotism--her father, J. Emory Mace, was the school's commandant of cadets from 1997 to 2005 during her enrollment--yet upon graduation in 1999 she refused to accept a commission in the United States Armed Forces, declining to serve the country she now routinely lectures on military readiness and veteran issues, thereby disqualifying herself from any moral standing to criticize or belittle the sacrifices of those who truly serve in uniform; Whereas in October 2021, Representative Mace publicly claimed she was the victim of vandalism when the words ``racist'' and ``transphobe'' were spray- painted on her South Carolina home, only for subsequent police reports and neighbor testimony to reveal that Representative Mace herself was the only individual captured on security footage holding a can of spray paint near the property at the time of the incident, leading law enforcement and multiple former staffers to conclude the act was staged for political sympathy and media attention; Whereas Representative Mace has repeatedly abused Capitol Police resources for personal vendettas and political theater, including in December 2023 when her incoming chief of staff, Lorie Khatod, summoned officers to her office to confront and intimidate her recently fired chief of staff, Dan Hanlon--over trivial disputes such as the removal of a popcorn machine-- creating a ``Be on the Lookout'' alert across Capitol grounds that left staff feeling unsafe and terrorized; and in December 2024, when Representative Mace prompted the arrest of foster youth advocate James McIntyre on assault charges for what eyewitnesses described as a standard handshake during a child welfare event, after which she staged a public spectacle by appearing in Congress wearing a wrist brace and arm sling to exaggerate minor or nonexistent injuries, tying the incident to her anti-transgender advocacy and eroding trust in law enforcement while diverting resources from genuine threats; Whereas in 2023-2024, Representative Mace misused her Members' Representational Allowance (MRA)--a taxpayer-funded resource strictly limited to official duties under House Rule XXIII--by seeking over $23,000 in reimbursements for lodging on her co-owned $1.6 million Washington, D.C., townhouse, including prohibited mortgage payments and inflated claims exceeding actual expenses by $8,900-$12,000, as detailed in a June 2024 ethics complaint filed by a constituent and under review by the House Ethics Committee, with former staff confirming she directed them to maximize daily reimbursements regardless of legitimacy, effectively treating the MRA as a personal piggy bank for self-enrichment at taxpayer expense; Whereas on October 4, 2023, during an official Fox Business interview conducted in the U.S. Capitol Rotunda regarding her vote to oust then-Speaker Kevin McCarthy, Representative Mace brazenly solicited campaign donations from viewers by directing them to her campaign website-- repeating the request three times on air and sharing the clip on social media with renewed donation pleas--in flagrant violation of federal law (18 U.S.C. Sec. 603) and House Rule XXIII, which prohibit the solicitation of contributions in any room or building occupied in the discharge of official duties, prompting an ethics complaint from the watchdog group Campaign for Accountability to the Office of Congressional Ethics, though no sanctions were imposed despite Representative Mace's admission that the act broke House rules; Whereas Representative Mace has repeatedly flouted South Carolina's ethics laws by failing to file required campaign finance disclosures for her lingering State House account from 2020 to 2022, amassing approximately $17,000 in fines from the South Carolina House Ethics Committee--making her one of the State's largest ethics debtors--before the committee unanimously reduced the penalty to $1,200 in December 2023 at her request, citing inability to pay, yet as of November 19, 2025, the reduced fine remains unpaid and outstanding despite Representative Mace's unsubstantiated claims of mailing a check in June 2024, demonstrating a persistent pattern of evasion and disregard for public accountability; Whereas multiple former congressional staffers, speaking both on and off the record in 2024-2025, have described Representative Mace's office as one of the most toxic workplaces on Capitol Hill, with documented instances of screaming at employees, public humiliation, erratic firings and rehires, demands for 24/7 availability, and retaliation against staff who raised concerns about ethics or legality--resulting in near-total turnover of her senior staff multiple times in a single Congress and repeated referrals to the Office of Congressional Workplace Rights for hostile-work-environment complaints; Whereas Donehue testified in the same deposition that Representative Mace routinely directed her congressional staff to create and operate anonymous ``burner accounts'' on X (formerly Twitter) and other platforms to monitor criticism, program bots for artificial promotion, and post false or misleading defenses of her image, misusing official resources and taxpayer-funded time for personal gain in violation of House Rule XXIII on ethical conduct and the Hatch Act; Whereas such conduct, whether fully adjudicated or not, reflects a pattern of ethical lapses, abuse of public trust, workplace toxicity, staged incidents for political gain, and disorderly behavior that undermines the dignity of the House of Representatives and erodes confidence in its Members, particularly as Representative Mace campaigns for Governor of South Carolina in 2026; Whereas such conduct, beginning before Representative Mace was first elected to Congress, spans both her official and unofficial duties, as well as her personal and professional life, demonstrates a clear pattern of ethical lapses, campaign finance violations, abuse of public trust, workplace toxicity, staged incidents for political gain, entitlement unbecoming of a Representative of her constituents, aggression against members of law enforcement and South Carolinians she claims to serve, and disorderly behavior that undermines the dignity of the House of Representatives and erodes confidence in its Members, particularly as Representative Mace campaigns for Governor of South Carolina in 2026; and Whereas the House has a solemn duty under Article I, Section 5 of the Constitution to punish its Members for disorderly behavior and enforce standards of decorum: Now, therefore, be it Resolved, That pursuant to Article I, Section 5, Clause 2 of the Constitution of the United States, Representative Nancy Mace, be, and she hereby is, expelled from the United States House of Representatives. <all>\n\nSUMMARY TO EVALUATE:\nTitle: Resolution to expel Representative Nancy Mace from the House of Representatives\nSummary: This resolution proposes the removal of Representative Nancy Mace from office due to a pattern of ethical violations and abuse of power. It aims to uphold the integrity of the House and ensure accountability for the use of public resources.\nKey Points: Alleged misuse of taxpayer funds for personal housing expenses., Accusations of harassment, threats, and attempted blackmail., Disrespectful behavior toward law enforcement and airport security staff., Illegal solicitation of campaign donations within federal buildings., Misuse of official resources to create a toxic workplace and manipulate social media.\n\nZASADY OCENY:\n1. Sprawdź wszystkie LICZBY, DATY i KWOTY w SUMMARY. Jeśli którejś brakuje w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n2. Sprawdź wszystkie NAZWISKA, ORGANIZACJE i MIEJSCA w SUMMARY. Jeśli którejś brakuje w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n3. Sprawdź wszystkie konkretne DZIAŁANIA PRAWNE . Jeśli tego mechanizmu nie ma w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n\nWAŻNE: Abstrakcyjne pojęcia (np. \"transparentność\", \"zaufanie\") są dozwolone jako wnioski.\n\nOUTPUT (JSON):\n{\n  \"is_valid\": true/false,\n  \"issue\": \"fabricated_entity\" / \"contradiction\" / \"none\"\n}\n\nWYMAGANIA FORMATOWANIA:\n1. Odpowiedz WYŁĄCZNIE surowym obiektem JSON.\n2. NIE używaj bloków kodu Markdown.\n3. NIE dodawaj żadnych wstępów ani wyjaśnień przed ani po JSONie.\n4. JSON musi być poprawny i gotowy do parsowania.\n\n",
      "ai_response_raw": "{\n  \"is_valid\": true,\n  \"issue\": \"none\"\n}"
    },
    {
      "timestamp": "2026-04-21T11:13:06.135Z",
      "source_url": "https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/hres1197/BILLS-119hres1197ih.htm",
      "model": "gemini-flash-latest",
      "prompt_sent": "\nJesteś ekspertem od prawa Stanów Zjednoczonych, który ma za zadanie analizować dokumenty ustaw, uchwał oraz innych dokumentów legislacyjnych, a następnie przygotowywać z nich informacje w przystępny sposób dla obywateli. Twoim celem jest przedstawienie informacji tak, aby obywatele mogli sami ocenić wpływ legislacji na ich życie, nawet bez posiadania specjalistycznej wiedzy legislacyjnej. Skup się na faktach i obiektywnych skutkach wprowadzanych zmian, unikając wartościowania i osobistych opinii. Wszelki żargon prawny jest zabroniony. Prezentuj informacje w jasny, zwięzły i angażujący sposób, tak aby były zrozumiałe dla osoby bez wykształcenia prawniczego. Unikaj długich, złożonych zdań. Zamiast pisać \"projekt ma na celu nowelizację kodeksu podatkowego...\", napisz \"Zmiany w podatkach: nowe ulgi i obowiązki dla...\". Kontynuuj swoją pracę, dopóki nie rozwiążesz swojego zadania. Jeśli nie masz pewności co do generowanej treści, przeanalizuj dokument ponownie – nie zgaduj. Rozplanuj dobrze swoje zadanie przed przystąpieniem do niego. W podsumowaniu i kluczowych punktach, jeśli to możliwe i uzasadnione, podkreśl, jakie konkretne korzyści lub skutki (pozytywne lub negatywne) wprowadza ustawa dla życia codziennego obywateli, ich praw i obowiązków, finansów osobistych, bezpieczeństwa i innych ważnych kwestii (np. kategorycznych zakazów i nakazów czy najważniejszych konkretnych alokacji finansowych i terytorialnych).\n\nTwoja odpowiedź MUSI być w formacie JSON - i zawierać następujące klucze.\nZanim zwrócisz odpowiedź, dokładnie zweryfikuj, czy cała struktura JSON jest w 100% poprawna, włącznie ze wszystkimi przecinkami, nawiasami klamrowymi, kwadratowymi oraz cudzysłowami. Błędny JSON jest nieakceptowalny i uniemożliwi przetworzenie Twojej pracy.\n\nPrzeanalizuj dokładnie poniższy tekst dokumentu prawnego. To jest treść, na podstawie której masz wygenerować podsumowanie i kluczowe punkty:\n--- POCZĄTEK DOKUMENTU ---\n[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H. Res. 1197 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. RES. 1197 Providing for the expulsion of Representative Nancy Mace from the United States House of Representatives. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 20, 2026 Mr. Mills submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ethics _______________________________________________________________________ RESOLUTION Providing for the expulsion of Representative Nancy Mace from the United States House of Representatives. Whereas on November 17, 2025, Patrick Bryant filed a restraining order against Representative Mace in Charleston County Court of Common Pleas, alleging her ongoing public harassment, profanity-laced threats against his attorneys, and dissemination of baseless claims via social media constitute irreparable harm, amid a protracted legal feud involving defamation suits, property disputes, and Representative Mace's accusations of Bryant's abuse; Whereas on November 26, 2025, Judge Donald B. Hocker issued a gag order preventing Representative Mace from publishing, posting, sharing, or creating any public content related to her ongoing lawsuits, after she disrupted the legal process by airing her personal grievances on her official social media and the House Floor; Whereas in a May 2025 deposition, Wesley Donehue, a former political strategist for Representative Nancy Mace, testified under oath that Representative Mace asked him to blackmail her then-fiance, Patrick Bryant, by threatening to publicly release explicit photographs allegedly found on Bryant's phone to secure full ownership of jointly held properties in Washington, D.C., and South Carolina's Isle of Palms, describing the request as an illegal act that prompted him to sever professional ties with her; Whereas Donehue further testified that Representative Mace explicitly claimed to possess evidence that Bryant had sexually assaulted and non-consensually filmed multiple other women, yet Representative Mace knowingly chose to vacation with Bryant on a 2023 Caribbean cruise rather than immediately report these alleged crimes to law enforcement or take any action to protect the identified victims, prioritizing her leisure over the potential sexual exploitation and victimization of other females, conduct that raises grave questions about the credibility, consistency, and moral seriousness of her subsequent public accusations of sexual misconduct against Bryant and others; Whereas on October 31, 2025, an incident report from the Charleston County Aviation Authority Police Department detailed Representative Mace's profane berating of law enforcement officers and Transportation Security Administration (TSA) agents at Charleston International Airport, including repeated use of derogatory language such as calling officers ``fucking incompetent'' and demanding preferential treatment as a ``fucking U.S. representative,'' behavior that shocked witnesses and prompted TSA supervisors to file internal reports; Whereas James A. Woods, Charleston Regional Aviation Authority Chief of Police, stated in a November 12 investigation report that Mace is responsible for turning a ``minor miscommunication'' into ``a spectacle'' through ``continued failure to follow established procedures at the checkpoint'', highlighting her routine and flagrant disregard for airport procedures, entitlement, and mistreatment of staff attempting to accommodate her requests that leave law enforcement and airport employees ``visibly upset'', ``frustrated'', and ``downtrodden''; Whereas Representative Mace gained admission to The Citadel Military College of South Carolina in 1996 through direct nepotism--her father, J. Emory Mace, was the school's commandant of cadets from 1997 to 2005 during her enrollment--yet upon graduation in 1999 she refused to accept a commission in the United States Armed Forces, declining to serve the country she now routinely lectures on military readiness and veteran issues, thereby disqualifying herself from any moral standing to criticize or belittle the sacrifices of those who truly serve in uniform; Whereas in October 2021, Representative Mace publicly claimed she was the victim of vandalism when the words ``racist'' and ``transphobe'' were spray- painted on her South Carolina home, only for subsequent police reports and neighbor testimony to reveal that Representative Mace herself was the only individual captured on security footage holding a can of spray paint near the property at the time of the incident, leading law enforcement and multiple former staffers to conclude the act was staged for political sympathy and media attention; Whereas Representative Mace has repeatedly abused Capitol Police resources for personal vendettas and political theater, including in December 2023 when her incoming chief of staff, Lorie Khatod, summoned officers to her office to confront and intimidate her recently fired chief of staff, Dan Hanlon--over trivial disputes such as the removal of a popcorn machine-- creating a ``Be on the Lookout'' alert across Capitol grounds that left staff feeling unsafe and terrorized; and in December 2024, when Representative Mace prompted the arrest of foster youth advocate James McIntyre on assault charges for what eyewitnesses described as a standard handshake during a child welfare event, after which she staged a public spectacle by appearing in Congress wearing a wrist brace and arm sling to exaggerate minor or nonexistent injuries, tying the incident to her anti-transgender advocacy and eroding trust in law enforcement while diverting resources from genuine threats; Whereas in 2023-2024, Representative Mace misused her Members' Representational Allowance (MRA)--a taxpayer-funded resource strictly limited to official duties under House Rule XXIII--by seeking over $23,000 in reimbursements for lodging on her co-owned $1.6 million Washington, D.C., townhouse, including prohibited mortgage payments and inflated claims exceeding actual expenses by $8,900-$12,000, as detailed in a June 2024 ethics complaint filed by a constituent and under review by the House Ethics Committee, with former staff confirming she directed them to maximize daily reimbursements regardless of legitimacy, effectively treating the MRA as a personal piggy bank for self-enrichment at taxpayer expense; Whereas on October 4, 2023, during an official Fox Business interview conducted in the U.S. Capitol Rotunda regarding her vote to oust then-Speaker Kevin McCarthy, Representative Mace brazenly solicited campaign donations from viewers by directing them to her campaign website-- repeating the request three times on air and sharing the clip on social media with renewed donation pleas--in flagrant violation of federal law (18 U.S.C. Sec. 603) and House Rule XXIII, which prohibit the solicitation of contributions in any room or building occupied in the discharge of official duties, prompting an ethics complaint from the watchdog group Campaign for Accountability to the Office of Congressional Ethics, though no sanctions were imposed despite Representative Mace's admission that the act broke House rules; Whereas Representative Mace has repeatedly flouted South Carolina's ethics laws by failing to file required campaign finance disclosures for her lingering State House account from 2020 to 2022, amassing approximately $17,000 in fines from the South Carolina House Ethics Committee--making her one of the State's largest ethics debtors--before the committee unanimously reduced the penalty to $1,200 in December 2023 at her request, citing inability to pay, yet as of November 19, 2025, the reduced fine remains unpaid and outstanding despite Representative Mace's unsubstantiated claims of mailing a check in June 2024, demonstrating a persistent pattern of evasion and disregard for public accountability; Whereas multiple former congressional staffers, speaking both on and off the record in 2024-2025, have described Representative Mace's office as one of the most toxic workplaces on Capitol Hill, with documented instances of screaming at employees, public humiliation, erratic firings and rehires, demands for 24/7 availability, and retaliation against staff who raised concerns about ethics or legality--resulting in near-total turnover of her senior staff multiple times in a single Congress and repeated referrals to the Office of Congressional Workplace Rights for hostile-work-environment complaints; Whereas Donehue testified in the same deposition that Representative Mace routinely directed her congressional staff to create and operate anonymous ``burner accounts'' on X (formerly Twitter) and other platforms to monitor criticism, program bots for artificial promotion, and post false or misleading defenses of her image, misusing official resources and taxpayer-funded time for personal gain in violation of House Rule XXIII on ethical conduct and the Hatch Act; Whereas such conduct, whether fully adjudicated or not, reflects a pattern of ethical lapses, abuse of public trust, workplace toxicity, staged incidents for political gain, and disorderly behavior that undermines the dignity of the House of Representatives and erodes confidence in its Members, particularly as Representative Mace campaigns for Governor of South Carolina in 2026; Whereas such conduct, beginning before Representative Mace was first elected to Congress, spans both her official and unofficial duties, as well as her personal and professional life, demonstrates a clear pattern of ethical lapses, campaign finance violations, abuse of public trust, workplace toxicity, staged incidents for political gain, entitlement unbecoming of a Representative of her constituents, aggression against members of law enforcement and South Carolinians she claims to serve, and disorderly behavior that undermines the dignity of the House of Representatives and erodes confidence in its Members, particularly as Representative Mace campaigns for Governor of South Carolina in 2026; and Whereas the House has a solemn duty under Article I, Section 5 of the Constitution to punish its Members for disorderly behavior and enforce standards of decorum: Now, therefore, be it Resolved, That pursuant to Article I, Section 5, Clause 2 of the Constitution of the United States, Representative Nancy Mace, be, and she hereby is, expelled from the United States House of Representatives. <all>\n--- KONIEC DOKUMENTU ---\n\nPAMIĘTAJ: Twoja odpowiedź MUSI być wyłącznie poprawnym obiektem JSON. Nie dodawaj żadnych dodatkowych znaków, komentarzy ani tekstu przed znacznikiem '{' ani po znaczniku '}'. Cała odpowiedź musi być parsowalna jako JSON.\nNa podstawie POWYŻSZEGO dokumentu, wypełnij poniższą strukturę JSON:\nOto struktura JSON, której oczekuję (wypełnij ją treścią):\n{\n  \"pl_ai_title\": \"Nowy, krótki tytuł dla aktu prawnego po polsku, oddający sedno wprowadzanych zmian (np. maksymalnie 10-12 słów).\",\n  \"pl_summary\": \"2-3 zdania zwięzłego podsumowania treści aktu prawnego po polsku, napisane z perspektywy wpływu na życie codzienne obywateli.\",\n  \"pl_key_points\": [\n    \"Pierwszy krótki punkt po polsku dotyczący najważniejszych wprowadzanych rozwiązań lub zmian.\",\n    \"Drugi krótki punkt po polsku...\"\n  ],\n  \"eng_ai_title\": \"A new, short title for the legal act in English, capturing the essence of the changes (e.g., max 10-12 words).\",\n  \"eng_summary\": \"2-3 sentences summarizing the legal act in English, from the perspective of its impact on citizens' daily lives.\",\n  \"eng_key_points\": [\n    \"First short bullet point in English regarding the most important solutions or changes being introduced.\",\n    \"Second short bullet point in English...\"\n  ],\n  \"de_ai_title\": \"Ein neuer, kurzer Titel für das Rechtsdokument auf Deutsch, der den Kern der Änderungen erfasst (z.B. max. 10-12 Wörter).\",\n  \"de_summary\": \"2-3 Sätze Zusammenfassung des Rechtsdokuments auf Deutsch, aus der Perspektive seiner Auswirkungen auf das tägliche Leben der Bürger.\",\n  \"de_key_points\": [\n    \"Erster kurzer Stichpunkt auf Deutsch zu den wichtigsten eingeführten Lösungen oder Änderungen.\",\n    \"Zweiter kurzer Stichpunkt auf Deutsch...\"\n  ],\n  \"fr_ai_title\": \"Un nouveau titre court pour l'acte juridique en français, saisissant l'essence des changements (par exemple, 10-12 mots maximum).\",\n  \"fr_summary\": \"Résumé de 2-3 phrases de l'acte juridique en français, du point de vue de son impact sur la vie quotidienne des citoyens.\",\n  \"fr_key_points\": [\n    \"Premier court point en français concernant les solutions ou changements les plus importants introduits.\",\n    \"Deuxième court point en français...\"\n  ],\n  \"es_ai_title\": \"Un nuevo título breve para el acto jurídico en español, que recoja la esencia de los cambios (por ejemplo, máximo 10-12 palabras).\",\n  \"es_summary\": \"Resumen de 2-3 frases del acto jurídico en español, desde la perspectiva de su impacto en la vida cotidiana de los ciudadanos.\",\n  \"es_key_points\": [\n    \"Primer punto breve en español sobre las soluciones o cambios más importantes que se introducen.\",\n    \"Segundo punto breve en español...\"\n  ],\n  \"it_ai_title\": \"Un nuovo titolo breve per l'atto giuridico in italiano, che colga l'essenza delle modifiche (ad es. massimo 10-12 parole).\",\n  \"it_summary\": \"Riepilogo di 2-3 frasi dell'atto giuridico in italiano, dal punto di vista del suo impatto sulla vita quotidiana dei cittadini.\",\n  \"it_key_points\": [\n    \"Primo breve punto in italiano riguardante le soluzioni o le modifiche più importanti introdotte.\",\n    \"Secondo breve punto in italiano...\"\n  ],\n  \"nl_ai_title\": \"Een nieuwe, korte titel voor de rechtshandeling in het Nederlands, die de essentie van de wijzigingen weergeeft (bijv. max. 10-12 woorden).\",\n  \"nl_summary\": \"Samenvatting van 2-3 zinnen van de rechtshandeling in het Nederlands, vanuit het perspectief van de impact op het dagelijks leven van burgers.\",\n  \"nl_key_points\": [\n    \"Eerste korte punt in het Nederlands betreffende de belangrijkste geïntroduceerde oplossingen of wijzigingen.\",\n    \"Tweede korte punt in het Nederlands...\"\n  ],\n  \"pt_ai_title\": \"Um novo título curto para o ato jurídico em português, capturando a essência das mudanças (por exemplo, máx. 10-12 palavras).\",\n  \"pt_summary\": \"Resumo de 2-3 frases do ato jurídico em português, na perspetiva do seu impacto na vida quotidiana dos cidadãos.\",\n  \"pt_key_points\": [\n    \"Primeiro ponto curto em português sobre as soluções ou alterações mais importantes introduzidas.\",\n    \"Segundo ponto curto em português...\"\n  ],\n  \"category\": [\"Categorize the document into one category by default, based on the field it primarily concerns. Choose up to 3 if the document also touches upon SIGNIFICANT issues from other categories. You MUST select categories ONLY from the following list: Health, Education, Family, Taxes, Labor, Security, Environment, Courts and Law, Transport, Benefits, Real Estate, Media and Culture, Local Government, Migration, Agriculture, Public Investments, Informatization, Economy. If the document does not definitively fit any of these, you MUST use \"Other\". If you use \"Other\", it should be the ONLY category selected. Do NOT invent new categories. The response must be an array of strings, e.g., [\"Taxes\", \"Family\"].\"]\n}\n\n",
      "ai_response_raw": "{\n  \"pl_ai_title\": \"Rezolucja w sprawie usunięcia Nancy Mace z Izby Reprezentantów\",\n  \"pl_summary\": \"Dokument ten jest propozycją usunięcia kongresmenki Nancy Mace z urzędu za liczne naruszenia etyki i nadużycia władzy. Ma to na celu ochronę standardów publicznych i zapewnienie, że przedstawiciele narodu działają zgodnie z prawem i interesem obywateli.\",\n  \"pl_key_points\": [\n    \"Zarzuty o niewłaściwe wykorzystanie pieniędzy podatników na prywatne cele mieszkaniowe.\",\n    \"Oskarżenia o nękanie, groźby i próby szantażu wobec osób prywatnych.\",\n    \"Niewłaściwe zachowanie wobec funkcjonariuszy policji i służb lotniskowych.\",\n    \"Naruszenie zasad etyki poprzez nielegalne zbieranie funduszy na kampanię w budynkach rządowych.\",\n    \"Tworzenie toksycznego środowiska pracy i nadużywanie zasobów Kongresu do celów politycznych.\"\n  ],\n  \"eng_ai_title\": \"Resolution to expel Representative Nancy Mace from the House of Representatives\",\n  \"eng_summary\": \"This resolution proposes the removal of Representative Nancy Mace from office due to a pattern of ethical violations and abuse of power. It aims to uphold the integrity of the House and ensure accountability for the use of public resources.\",\n  \"eng_key_points\": [\n    \"Alleged misuse of taxpayer funds for personal housing expenses.\",\n    \"Accusations of harassment, threats, and attempted blackmail.\",\n    \"Disrespectful behavior toward law enforcement and airport security staff.\",\n    \"Illegal solicitation of campaign donations within federal buildings.\",\n    \"Misuse of official resources to create a toxic workplace and manipulate social media.\"\n  ],\n  \"de_ai_title\": \"Resolution zum Ausschluss der Abgeordneten Nancy Mace aus dem Repräsentantenhaus\",\n  \"de_summary\": \"Dieser Resolutionsentwurf sieht den Ausschluss der Abgeordneten Nancy Mace wegen zahlreicher ethischer Verstöße und Amtsmissbrauch vor. Ziel ist es, das Vertrauen der Bürger in die Integrität der parlamentarischen Arbeit zu wahren.\",\n  \"de_key_points\": [\n    \"Vorwurf der Zweckentfremdung von Steuergeldern für private Wohnkosten.\",\n    \"Anschuldigungen wegen Belästigung, Drohungen und versuchter Erpressung.\",\n    \"Unangemessenes Verhalten gegenüber Polizeibeamten und Sicherheitspersonal.\",\n    \"Verstoß gegen Ethikregeln durch illegale Spendensammlung in Regierungsgebäuden.\",\n    \"Schaffung eines toxischen Arbeitsumfelds und Missbrauch offizieller Ressourcen.\"\n  ],\n  \"fr_ai_title\": \"Résolution visant à expulser la représentante Nancy Mace de la Chambre des représentants\",\n  \"fr_summary\": \"Cette résolution propose de démettre la représentante Nancy Mace de ses fonctions en raison de violations éthiques répétées et d'abus de pouvoir. Elle vise à garantir que les élus respectent les normes de conduite attendues par les citoyens.\",\n  \"fr_key_points\": [\n    \"Détournement présumé de fonds publics pour des dépenses de logement personnel.\",\n    \"Accusations de harcèlement, de menaces et de tentative de chantage.\",\n    \"Comportement irrespectueux envers les forces de l'ordre et le personnel de sécurité.\",\n    \"Sollicitation illégale de dons de campagne à l'intérieur des bâtiments officiels.\",\n    \"Création d'un environnement de travail toxique et utilisation abusive des ressources du Congrès.\"\n  ],\n  \"es_ai_title\": \"Resolución para expulsar a la representante Nancy Mace de la Cámara de Representantes\",\n  \"es_summary\": \"Esta resolución propone la destitución de la representante Nancy Mace por múltiples violaciones éticas y abuso de poder. Busca proteger la integridad de las instituciones públicas y asegurar el uso correcto de los recursos de los ciudadanos.\",\n  \"es_key_points\": [\n    \"Presunto uso indebido de fondos públicos para gastos de vivienda personal.\",\n    \"Acusaciones de acoso, amenazas e intento de chantaje.\",\n    \"Comportamiento irrespetuoso hacia la policía y el personal de seguridad aeroportuaria.\",\n    \"Solicitud ilegal de donaciones de campaña dentro de edificios gubernamentales.\",\n    \"Creación de un ambiente de trabajo tóxico y uso indebido de recursos oficiales.\"\n  ],\n  \"it_ai_title\": \"Risoluzione per l'espulsione della rappresentante Nancy Mace dalla Camera dei Rappresentanti\",\n  \"it_summary\": \"Questa risoluzione propone la rimozione della rappresentante Nancy Mace dal suo incarico a causa di ripetute violazioni etiche e abusi di potere. L'obiettivo è mantenere l'integrità del governo e la fiducia dei cittadini.\",\n  \"it_key_points\": [\n    \"Presunto uso improprio di fondi pubblici per spese abitative personali.\",\n    \"Accuse di molestie, minacce e tentato ricatto.\",\n    \"Comportamento irrispettoso verso le forze dell'ordine e il personale aeroportuale.\",\n    \"Sollecitazione illegale di donazioni elettorali all'interno di edifici federali.\",\n    \"Creazione di un ambiente di lavoro tossico e abuso di risorse ufficiali.\"\n  ],\n  \"nl_ai_title\": \"Resolutie om afgevaardigde Nancy Mace uit het Huis van Afgevaardigden te zetten\",\n  \"nl_summary\": \"Deze resolutie stelt voor om afgevaardigde Nancy Mace uit haar ambt te zetten vanwege herhaalde ethische schendingen en machtsmisbruik. Het doel is om de integriteit van de overheid te waarborgen en verantwoording af te leggen aan de burgers.\",\n  \"nl_key_points\": [\n    \"Vermeend misbruik van belastinggeld voor persoonlijke huisvestingskosten.\",\n    \"Beschuldigingen van intimidatie, bedreigingen en poging tot chantage.\",\n    \"Respectloos gedrag tegenover politieagenten en beveiligingspersoneel op luchthavens.\",\n    \"Illegale werving van campagnebijdragen in overheidsgebouwen.\",\n    \"Creëren van een toxische werkomgeving en misbruik van officiële middelen.\"\n  ],\n  \"pt_ai_title\": \"Resolução para expulsar a representante Nancy Mace da Câmara dos Representantes\",\n  \"pt_summary\": \"Esta resolução propõe a destituição da representante Nancy Mace devido a um padrão de violações éticas e abuso de poder. O objetivo é garantir que os representantes públicos ajam com integridade e respeitem os recursos dos contribuintes.\",\n  \"pt_key_points\": [\n    \"Alegado uso indevido de fundos públicos para despesas de habitação pessoal.\",\n    \"Acusações de assédio, ameaças e tentativa de chantagem.\",\n    \"Comportamento desrespeitoso para com as forças de segurança e funcionários aeroportuários.\",\n    \"Solicitação ilegal de doações de campanha dentro de edifícios federais.\",\n    \"Criação de um ambiente de trabalho tóxico e uso indevido de recursos oficiais.\"\n  ],\n  \"category\": [\"Courts and Law\"]\n}"
    }
  ]
}