{
  "legislationId": "119_HRES_1217",
  "lastUpdate": "2026-04-28T11:19:28.883Z",
  "history": [
    {
      "timestamp": "2026-04-28T11:19:28.883Z",
      "source_url": "https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/hres1217/BILLS-119hres1217ih.htm",
      "model": "gemini-flash-lite-latest",
      "prompt_sent": "\nROLE: Fact Checker.\nZADANIE: Porównaj SOURCE (oryginał) i SUMMARY (streszczenie przygotowane przez inne AI).\n\nTwoim celem jest wykrycie \"ZMYŚLONYCH KONKRETÓW\" (Fabricated Entities) w SUMMARY.\n\nSOURCE:\n[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H. Res. 1217 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. RES. 1217 Expressing support for the citizens of the United Kingdom as they continue to face assaults on their rights to free speech and freedom of expression. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 27, 2026 Mr. Rulli (for himself, Mr. Davidson, and Mr. Van Drew) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committees on the Judiciary, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned _______________________________________________________________________ RESOLUTION Expressing support for the citizens of the United Kingdom as they continue to face assaults on their rights to free speech and freedom of expression. Whereas the right to free speech and freedom of expression, guaranteed by the First Amendment to the Constitution, is critical to upholding the fundamental underpinnings of democracy in the United States and in democracies around the world; Whereas freedom of speech and freedom of expression foster conversation, debate, and understanding; Whereas citizens of the United States should not have their rights to free speech or freedom of expression restricted by any foreign government; Whereas Prime Minister Keir Starmer and other officials of the United Kingdom have taken actions that censor, imprison, or otherwise punish their own citizens for exercising their rights to free speech and freedom of expression; Whereas the refusal of Prime Minister Keir Starmer and other officials of the United Kingdom to halt mass migration into the United Kingdom has contributed to social unrest and prompted citizens of the United Kingdom to express their displeasure with such policies online; Whereas Toby Young, founder and director of the Free Speech Union, and his organization have experienced an influx of members as a result of citizens of the United Kingdom facing consequences for exercising their rights to free speech and freedom of expression; Whereas, in September 2025, more than 100,000 individuals assembled in London to protest the violations of their rights to free speech and freedom of expression; Whereas oversight by the Committee on the Judiciary has revealed that the government of the United Kingdom seeks to censor United States-based platforms and legitimate criticisms of its policies; Whereas the Online Safety Act grants government regulators broad authority to regulate forms of expression that they arbitrarily deem offensive or improper; Whereas London Metropolitan Police Chief Mark Rowley has repeatedly threatened to arrest both citizens of the United Kingdom and of the United States for online comments, and has singled out Elon Musk, the owner of the social media platform X; Whereas five armed police officers detained Irish comedian Graham Linehan upon his arrival at Heathrow Airport from Arizona in connection with posts he had made on X; Whereas Ed Davey, leader of the Liberal Democratic Party, has called for the arrest of Elon Musk and regards him as a criminal in connection with comments Musk made on his own platform; Whereas Isabel Vaughan-Spruce, director of March for Life UK, was arrested twice within five months for silently praying outside an abortion clinic; Whereas Adam Smith-Connor, a British Army veteran, was convicted and forced to pay a fine for silently praying outside an abortion clinic; and Whereas British authorities arrest more than 12,000 individuals in the United Kingdom each year for speech-related offenses, averaging roughly 30 individuals per day: Now, therefore, be it Resolved, That the House of Representatives-- (1) expresses disapproval of Prime Minister Keir Starmer and the Labour Party for violating the rights to freedom of speech and expression of the citizens of the United Kingdom; (2) condemns statements and actions by officials of the United Kingdom that seek to extradite American citizens for exercising the right to freedom of speech guaranteed under the Constitution of the United States; (3) urges the Trump Administration to employ all necessary resources, including tariffs, sanctions, revocation of visas, and other measures, to hold accountable officials of the United Kingdom who act as though they are above the Constitution of the United States; (4) urges the Trump Administration to refuse recognition of any laws or orders of the United Kingdom that infringe upon the rights to freedom of speech and expression; (5) reaffirms that, in commemoration of the 250th anniversary of the United States of America, our Founding Fathers and patriots fought against a tyrannical government that levied unjust taxes, violated fundamental rights, and restricted the rights to freedom of speech and expression; and (6) reaffirms that the constitutionally protected rights of American citizens take precedence over any actions by officials of the United Kingdom aimed at undermining such rights. <all>\n\nSUMMARY TO EVALUATE:\nTitle: Resolution Supporting Free Speech in the UK and Protecting US Citizens\nSummary: This resolution opposes free speech restrictions in the UK and protects US citizens from British censorship attempts. It suggests sanctions and tariffs against UK officials who violate these fundamental rights.\nKey Points: Protects Americans from extradition to the UK for exercising free speech online., Calls for tariffs, sanctions, and visa revocations for UK officials who suppress freedom of expression., Refuses to recognize UK laws or orders that infringe upon fundamental speech rights., Condemns arrests for silent prayer and online comments regarding government policies.\n\nZASADY OCENY:\n1. Sprawdź wszystkie LICZBY, DATY i KWOTY w SUMMARY. Jeśli którejś brakuje w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n2. Sprawdź wszystkie NAZWISKA, ORGANIZACJE i MIEJSCA w SUMMARY. Jeśli którejś brakuje w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n3. Sprawdź wszystkie konkretne DZIAŁANIA PRAWNE . Jeśli tego mechanizmu nie ma w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n\nWAŻNE: Abstrakcyjne pojęcia (np. \"transparentność\", \"zaufanie\") są dozwolone jako wnioski.\n\nOUTPUT (JSON):\n{\n  \"is_valid\": true/false,\n  \"issue\": \"fabricated_entity\" / \"contradiction\" / \"none\"\n}\n\nWYMAGANIA FORMATOWANIA:\n1. Odpowiedz WYŁĄCZNIE surowym obiektem JSON.\n2. NIE używaj bloków kodu Markdown.\n3. NIE dodawaj żadnych wstępów ani wyjaśnień przed ani po JSONie.\n4. JSON musi być poprawny i gotowy do parsowania.\n\n",
      "ai_response_raw": "{\n  \"is_valid\": true,\n  \"issue\": \"none\"\n}"
    },
    {
      "timestamp": "2026-04-28T11:12:09.273Z",
      "source_url": "https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/hres1217/BILLS-119hres1217ih.htm",
      "model": "gemini-flash-latest",
      "prompt_sent": "\nJesteś ekspertem od prawa Stanów Zjednoczonych, który ma za zadanie analizować dokumenty ustaw, uchwał oraz innych dokumentów legislacyjnych, a następnie przygotowywać z nich informacje w przystępny sposób dla obywateli. Twoim celem jest przedstawienie informacji tak, aby obywatele mogli sami ocenić wpływ legislacji na ich życie, nawet bez posiadania specjalistycznej wiedzy legislacyjnej. Skup się na faktach i obiektywnych skutkach wprowadzanych zmian, unikając wartościowania i osobistych opinii. Wszelki żargon prawny jest zabroniony. Prezentuj informacje w jasny, zwięzły i angażujący sposób, tak aby były zrozumiałe dla osoby bez wykształcenia prawniczego. Unikaj długich, złożonych zdań. Zamiast pisać \"projekt ma na celu nowelizację kodeksu podatkowego...\", napisz \"Zmiany w podatkach: nowe ulgi i obowiązki dla...\". Kontynuuj swoją pracę, dopóki nie rozwiążesz swojego zadania. Jeśli nie masz pewności co do generowanej treści, przeanalizuj dokument ponownie – nie zgaduj. Rozplanuj dobrze swoje zadanie przed przystąpieniem do niego. W podsumowaniu i kluczowych punktach, jeśli to możliwe i uzasadnione, podkreśl, jakie konkretne korzyści lub skutki (pozytywne lub negatywne) wprowadza ustawa dla życia codziennego obywateli, ich praw i obowiązków, finansów osobistych, bezpieczeństwa i innych ważnych kwestii (np. kategorycznych zakazów i nakazów czy najważniejszych konkretnych alokacji finansowych i terytorialnych).\n\nTwoja odpowiedź MUSI być w formacie JSON - i zawierać następujące klucze.\nZanim zwrócisz odpowiedź, dokładnie zweryfikuj, czy cała struktura JSON jest w 100% poprawna, włącznie ze wszystkimi przecinkami, nawiasami klamrowymi, kwadratowymi oraz cudzysłowami. Błędny JSON jest nieakceptowalny i uniemożliwi przetworzenie Twojej pracy.\n\nPrzeanalizuj dokładnie poniższy tekst dokumentu prawnego. To jest treść, na podstawie której masz wygenerować podsumowanie i kluczowe punkty:\n--- POCZĄTEK DOKUMENTU ---\n[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H. Res. 1217 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. RES. 1217 Expressing support for the citizens of the United Kingdom as they continue to face assaults on their rights to free speech and freedom of expression. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 27, 2026 Mr. Rulli (for himself, Mr. Davidson, and Mr. Van Drew) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committees on the Judiciary, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned _______________________________________________________________________ RESOLUTION Expressing support for the citizens of the United Kingdom as they continue to face assaults on their rights to free speech and freedom of expression. Whereas the right to free speech and freedom of expression, guaranteed by the First Amendment to the Constitution, is critical to upholding the fundamental underpinnings of democracy in the United States and in democracies around the world; Whereas freedom of speech and freedom of expression foster conversation, debate, and understanding; Whereas citizens of the United States should not have their rights to free speech or freedom of expression restricted by any foreign government; Whereas Prime Minister Keir Starmer and other officials of the United Kingdom have taken actions that censor, imprison, or otherwise punish their own citizens for exercising their rights to free speech and freedom of expression; Whereas the refusal of Prime Minister Keir Starmer and other officials of the United Kingdom to halt mass migration into the United Kingdom has contributed to social unrest and prompted citizens of the United Kingdom to express their displeasure with such policies online; Whereas Toby Young, founder and director of the Free Speech Union, and his organization have experienced an influx of members as a result of citizens of the United Kingdom facing consequences for exercising their rights to free speech and freedom of expression; Whereas, in September 2025, more than 100,000 individuals assembled in London to protest the violations of their rights to free speech and freedom of expression; Whereas oversight by the Committee on the Judiciary has revealed that the government of the United Kingdom seeks to censor United States-based platforms and legitimate criticisms of its policies; Whereas the Online Safety Act grants government regulators broad authority to regulate forms of expression that they arbitrarily deem offensive or improper; Whereas London Metropolitan Police Chief Mark Rowley has repeatedly threatened to arrest both citizens of the United Kingdom and of the United States for online comments, and has singled out Elon Musk, the owner of the social media platform X; Whereas five armed police officers detained Irish comedian Graham Linehan upon his arrival at Heathrow Airport from Arizona in connection with posts he had made on X; Whereas Ed Davey, leader of the Liberal Democratic Party, has called for the arrest of Elon Musk and regards him as a criminal in connection with comments Musk made on his own platform; Whereas Isabel Vaughan-Spruce, director of March for Life UK, was arrested twice within five months for silently praying outside an abortion clinic; Whereas Adam Smith-Connor, a British Army veteran, was convicted and forced to pay a fine for silently praying outside an abortion clinic; and Whereas British authorities arrest more than 12,000 individuals in the United Kingdom each year for speech-related offenses, averaging roughly 30 individuals per day: Now, therefore, be it Resolved, That the House of Representatives-- (1) expresses disapproval of Prime Minister Keir Starmer and the Labour Party for violating the rights to freedom of speech and expression of the citizens of the United Kingdom; (2) condemns statements and actions by officials of the United Kingdom that seek to extradite American citizens for exercising the right to freedom of speech guaranteed under the Constitution of the United States; (3) urges the Trump Administration to employ all necessary resources, including tariffs, sanctions, revocation of visas, and other measures, to hold accountable officials of the United Kingdom who act as though they are above the Constitution of the United States; (4) urges the Trump Administration to refuse recognition of any laws or orders of the United Kingdom that infringe upon the rights to freedom of speech and expression; (5) reaffirms that, in commemoration of the 250th anniversary of the United States of America, our Founding Fathers and patriots fought against a tyrannical government that levied unjust taxes, violated fundamental rights, and restricted the rights to freedom of speech and expression; and (6) reaffirms that the constitutionally protected rights of American citizens take precedence over any actions by officials of the United Kingdom aimed at undermining such rights. <all>\n--- KONIEC DOKUMENTU ---\n\nPAMIĘTAJ: Twoja odpowiedź MUSI być wyłącznie poprawnym obiektem JSON. Nie dodawaj żadnych dodatkowych znaków, komentarzy ani tekstu przed znacznikiem '{' ani po znaczniku '}'. Cała odpowiedź musi być parsowalna jako JSON.\nNa podstawie POWYŻSZEGO dokumentu, wypełnij poniższą strukturę JSON:\nOto struktura JSON, której oczekuję (wypełnij ją treścią):\n{\n  \"pl_ai_title\": \"Nowy, krótki tytuł dla aktu prawnego po polsku, oddający sedno wprowadzanych zmian (np. maksymalnie 10-12 słów).\",\n  \"pl_summary\": \"2-3 zdania zwięzłego podsumowania treści aktu prawnego po polsku, napisane z perspektywy wpływu na życie codzienne obywateli.\",\n  \"pl_key_points\": [\n    \"Pierwszy krótki punkt po polsku dotyczący najważniejszych wprowadzanych rozwiązań lub zmian.\",\n    \"Drugi krótki punkt po polsku...\"\n  ],\n  \"eng_ai_title\": \"A new, short title for the legal act in English, capturing the essence of the changes (e.g., max 10-12 words).\",\n  \"eng_summary\": \"2-3 sentences summarizing the legal act in English, from the perspective of its impact on citizens' daily lives.\",\n  \"eng_key_points\": [\n    \"First short bullet point in English regarding the most important solutions or changes being introduced.\",\n    \"Second short bullet point in English...\"\n  ],\n  \"de_ai_title\": \"Ein neuer, kurzer Titel für das Rechtsdokument auf Deutsch, der den Kern der Änderungen erfasst (z.B. max. 10-12 Wörter).\",\n  \"de_summary\": \"2-3 Sätze Zusammenfassung des Rechtsdokuments auf Deutsch, aus der Perspektive seiner Auswirkungen auf das tägliche Leben der Bürger.\",\n  \"de_key_points\": [\n    \"Erster kurzer Stichpunkt auf Deutsch zu den wichtigsten eingeführten Lösungen oder Änderungen.\",\n    \"Zweiter kurzer Stichpunkt auf Deutsch...\"\n  ],\n  \"fr_ai_title\": \"Un nouveau titre court pour l'acte juridique en français, saisissant l'essence des changements (par exemple, 10-12 mots maximum).\",\n  \"fr_summary\": \"Résumé de 2-3 phrases de l'acte juridique en français, du point de vue de son impact sur la vie quotidienne des citoyens.\",\n  \"fr_key_points\": [\n    \"Premier court point en français concernant les solutions ou changements les plus importants introduits.\",\n    \"Deuxième court point en français...\"\n  ],\n  \"es_ai_title\": \"Un nuevo título breve para el acto jurídico en español, que recoja la esencia de los cambios (por ejemplo, máximo 10-12 palabras).\",\n  \"es_summary\": \"Resumen de 2-3 frases del acto jurídico en español, desde la perspectiva de su impacto en la vida cotidiana de los ciudadanos.\",\n  \"es_key_points\": [\n    \"Primer punto breve en español sobre las soluciones o cambios más importantes que se introducen.\",\n    \"Segundo punto breve en español...\"\n  ],\n  \"it_ai_title\": \"Un nuovo titolo breve per l'atto giuridico in italiano, che colga l'essenza delle modifiche (ad es. massimo 10-12 parole).\",\n  \"it_summary\": \"Riepilogo di 2-3 frasi dell'atto giuridico in italiano, dal punto di vista del suo impatto sulla vita quotidiana dei cittadini.\",\n  \"it_key_points\": [\n    \"Primo breve punto in italiano riguardante le soluzioni o le modifiche più importanti introdotte.\",\n    \"Secondo breve punto in italiano...\"\n  ],\n  \"nl_ai_title\": \"Een nieuwe, korte titel voor de rechtshandeling in het Nederlands, die de essentie van de wijzigingen weergeeft (bijv. max. 10-12 woorden).\",\n  \"nl_summary\": \"Samenvatting van 2-3 zinnen van de rechtshandeling in het Nederlands, vanuit het perspectief van de impact op het dagelijks leven van burgers.\",\n  \"nl_key_points\": [\n    \"Eerste korte punt in het Nederlands betreffende de belangrijkste geïntroduceerde oplossingen of wijzigingen.\",\n    \"Tweede korte punt in het Nederlands...\"\n  ],\n  \"pt_ai_title\": \"Um novo título curto para o ato jurídico em português, capturando a essência das mudanças (por exemplo, máx. 10-12 palavras).\",\n  \"pt_summary\": \"Resumo de 2-3 frases do ato jurídico em português, na perspetiva do seu impacto na vida quotidiana dos cidadãos.\",\n  \"pt_key_points\": [\n    \"Primeiro ponto curto em português sobre as soluções ou alterações mais importantes introduzidas.\",\n    \"Segundo ponto curto em português...\"\n  ],\n  \"category\": [\"Categorize the document into one category by default, based on the field it primarily concerns. Choose up to 3 if the document also touches upon SIGNIFICANT issues from other categories. You MUST select categories ONLY from the following list: Health, Education, Family, Taxes, Labor, Security, Environment, Courts and Law, Transport, Benefits, Real Estate, Media and Culture, Local Government, Migration, Agriculture, Public Investments, Informatization, Economy. If the document does not definitively fit any of these, you MUST use \"Other\". If you use \"Other\", it should be the ONLY category selected. Do NOT invent new categories. The response must be an array of strings, e.g., [\"Taxes\", \"Family\"].\"]\n}\n\n",
      "ai_response_raw": "{\n  \"pl_ai_title\": \"Rezolucja w obronie wolności słowa w Wielkiej Brytanii i ochrony Amerykanów\",\n  \"pl_summary\": \"Projekt wyraża sprzeciw wobec ograniczania wolności słowa w Wielkiej Brytanii i chroni obywateli USA przed brytyjskimi próbami cenzury. Przewiduje on nałożenie sankcji i ceł na brytyjskich urzędników naruszających te podstawowe prawa.\",\n  \"pl_key_points\": [\n    \"Ochrona Amerykanów przed ekstradycją do Wielkiej Brytanii za wpisy w mediach społecznościowych.\",\n    \"Możliwość nałożenia ceł, sankcji i cofnięcia wiz brytyjskim urzędnikom ograniczającym wolność wypowiedzi.\",\n    \"Odmowa uznawania brytyjskich przepisów i wyroków, które uderzają w wolność słowa.\",\n    \"Sprzeciw wobec aresztowań za modlitwę w ciszy oraz krytykę polityki migracyjnej w internecie.\"\n  ],\n  \"eng_ai_title\": \"Resolution Supporting Free Speech in the UK and Protecting US Citizens\",\n  \"eng_summary\": \"This resolution opposes free speech restrictions in the UK and protects US citizens from British censorship attempts. It suggests sanctions and tariffs against UK officials who violate these fundamental rights.\",\n  \"eng_key_points\": [\n    \"Protects Americans from extradition to the UK for exercising free speech online.\",\n    \"Calls for tariffs, sanctions, and visa revocations for UK officials who suppress freedom of expression.\",\n    \"Refuses to recognize UK laws or orders that infringe upon fundamental speech rights.\",\n    \"Condemns arrests for silent prayer and online comments regarding government policies.\"\n  ],\n  \"de_ai_title\": \"Resolution zur Unterstützung der Meinungsfreiheit im Vereinigten Königreich und zum Schutz von US-Bürgern\",\n  \"de_summary\": \"Diese Resolution lehnt Einschränkungen der Meinungsfreiheit im Vereinigten Königreich ab und schützt US-Bürger vor britischen Zensurversuchen. Sie schlägt Sanktionen und Zölle gegen britische Beamte vor, die diese Rechte verletzen.\",\n  \"de_key_points\": [\n    \"Schutz von Amerikanern vor Auslieferung an das Vereinigte Königreich wegen Online-Kommentaren.\",\n    \"Forderung nach Zöllen, Sanktionen und Visumsentzug für britische Beamte, die die Meinungsfreiheit unterdrücken.\",\n    \"Verweigerung der Anerkennung britischer Gesetze, die Grundrechte auf freie Rede verletzen.\",\n    \"Verurteilung von Verhaftungen wegen stillem Gebet und Kritik an der Migrationspolitik im Internet.\"\n  ],\n  \"fr_ai_title\": \"Résolution soutenant la liberté d'expression au Royaume-Uni et protégeant les citoyens américains\",\n  \"fr_summary\": \"Cette résolution s'oppose aux restrictions de la liberté d'expression au Royaume-Uni et protège les citoyens américains contre les tentatives de censure britanniques. Elle suggère des sanctions et des tarifs douaniers contre les responsables britanniques.\",\n  \"fr_key_points\": [\n    \"Protège les Américains contre l'extradition vers le Royaume-Uni pour des propos tenus en ligne.\",\n    \"Appelle à des tarifs douaniers, des sanctions et des révocations de visas pour les responsables britanniques réprimant la liberté d'expression.\",\n    \"Refuse de reconnaître les lois britanniques qui portent atteinte aux droits fondamentaux de parole.\",\n    \"Condamne les arrestations pour prière silencieuse et critiques de la politique migratoire sur les réseaux sociaux.\"\n  ],\n  \"es_ai_title\": \"Resolución en apoyo a la libertad de expresión en el Reino Unido y protección de ciudadanos estadounidenses\",\n  \"es_summary\": \"Esta resolución se opone a las restricciones de la libertad de expresión en el Reino Unido y protege a los ciudadanos estadounidenses de los intentos de censura británicos. Sugiere sanciones y aranceles contra funcionarios británicos.\",\n  \"es_key_points\": [\n    \"Protege a los estadounidenses de la extradición al Reino Unido por comentarios en redes sociales.\",\n    \"Pide aranceles, sanciones y revocación de visas para los funcionarios británicos que supriman la libertad de expresión.\",\n    \"Se niega a reconocer las leyes británicas que infrinjan los derechos fundamentales de expresión.\",\n    \"Condena las detenciones por rezar en silencio y por criticar las políticas migratorias en línea.\"\n  ],\n  \"it_ai_title\": \"Risoluzione a sostegno della libertà di parola nel Regno Unito e protezione dei cittadini statunitensi\",\n  \"it_summary\": \"Questa risoluzione si oppone alle restrizioni della libertà di parola nel Regno Unito e protegge i cittadini statunitensi dai tentativi di censura britannici. Propone sanzioni e dazi contro i funzionari britannici.\",\n  \"it_key_points\": [\n    \"Protegge gli americani dall'estradizione nel Regno Unito per commenti pubblicati online.\",\n    \"Richiede dazi, sanzioni e revoca dei visti per i funzionari britannici che sopprimono la libertà di espressione.\",\n    \"Rifiuta di riconoscere le leggi britanniche che violano i diritti fondamentali di parola.\",\n    \"Condanna gli arresti per preghiera silenziosa e critiche alla politica migratoria sui social media.\"\n  ],\n  \"nl_ai_title\": \"Resolutie ter ondersteuning van de vrijheid van meningsuiting in het VK en bescherming van Amerikaanse burgers\",\n  \"nl_summary\": \"Deze resolutie verzet zich tegen beperkingen van de vrijheid van meningsuiting in het Verenigd Koninkrijk en beschermt Amerikaanse burgers tegen Britse censuurpogingen. Het stelt sancties en tarieven voor tegen Britse functionarissen.\",\n  \"nl_key_points\": [\n    \"Beschermt Amerikanen tegen uitlevering aan het VK vanwege online uitlatingen.\",\n    \"Roept op tot tarieven, sancties en intrekking van visa voor Britse functionarissen die de vrijheid van meningsuiting onderdrukken.\",\n    \"Weigert Britse wetten te erkennen die inbreuk maken op fundamentele spraakrechten.\",\n    \"Veroordeelt arrestaties voor stil gebed en kritiek op het migratiebeleid op sociale media.\"\n  ],\n  \"pt_ai_title\": \"Resolução de apoio à liberdade de expressão no Reino Unido e proteção de cidadãos americanos\",\n  \"pt_summary\": \"Esta resolução opõe-se às restrições à liberdade de expressão no Reino Unido e protege os cidadãos americanos de tentativas de censura britânicas. Sugere sanções e tarifas contra funcionários britânicos.\",\n  \"pt_key_points\": [\n    \"Protege os americanos da extradição para o Reino Unido por comentários em redes sociais.\",\n    \"Apela a tarifas, sanções e revogação de vistos para funcionários britânicos que suprimam a liberdade de expressão.\",\n    \"Recusa reconhecer leis britânicas que infrinjam os direitos fundamentais de expressão.\",\n    \"Condena detenções por oração silenciosa e críticas à política de migração na internet.\"\n  ],\n  \"category\": [\n    \"Courts and Law\",\n    \"Media and Culture\",\n    \"Security\"\n  ]\n}"
    }
  ]
}