{
  "legislationId": "119_HR_7692",
  "lastUpdate": "2026-03-25T12:26:07.252Z",
  "history": [
    {
      "timestamp": "2026-03-25T12:26:07.252Z",
      "source_url": "https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/hr7692/BILLS-119hr7692ih.htm",
      "model": "gemini-flash-lite-latest",
      "prompt_sent": "\nROLE: Fact Checker.\nZADANIE: Porównaj SOURCE (oryginał) i SUMMARY (streszczenie przygotowane przez inne AI).\n\nTwoim celem jest wykrycie \"ZMYŚLONYCH KONKRETÓW\" (Fabricated Entities) w SUMMARY.\n\nSOURCE:\n[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.R. 7692 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 7692 To amend title 28, United States Code, to establish an Office of Ethics Counsel and an Office of Investigative Counsel within the Supreme Court of the United States. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES February 25, 2026 Mr. Goldman of New York (for himself, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Mr. Nadler, Ms. Norton, Mr. Tonko, Mr. Thanedar, Ms. Garcia of Texas, Mr. Krishnamoorthi, Mr. Ivey, and Mr. Landsman) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To amend title 28, United States Code, to establish an Office of Ethics Counsel and an Office of Investigative Counsel within the Supreme Court of the United States. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Supreme Court Ethics and Investigations Act''. SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE OFFICE OF ETHICS COUNSEL WITHIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. (a) In General.--Chapter 45 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: ``Sec. 678. Office of Ethics Counsel ``(a) The Office of Ethics Counsel.--The Chief Justice is authorized to establish an Office of Ethics Counsel within the Supreme Court of the United States-- ``(1) constituted by one chief ethics counsel who may employ such officers and employees, subject to the provisions of title 5, governing appointments in the competitive service, and the provisions of chapter 51 and subchapter III of chapter 53 of such title relating to classification and General Schedule pay rates; and ``(2) to advise and provide guidance to justices of the Supreme Court, and their spouses, on matters of judicial ethics, including-- ``(A) financial disclosure requirements; ``(B) the acceptance of gifts; ``(C) political activity; ``(D) conflicts of interest and recusal; and ``(E) the unauthorized disclosure of official Court documents. ``(b) Ethics Counsels.-- ``(1) Staffing and compensation of counsels.-- ``(A) Chief ethics counsel.--The chief ethics counsel within the Office of Ethics Counsel-- ``(i) may not be employed by the Court on the date of enactment of this section; ``(ii) shall be appointed by the Chief Justice; ``(iii) shall serve not more than two 6- year terms; and ``(iv) shall receive an annual rate of pay of at least $225,000. ``(B) Other counsels.--Any counsel other than the chief ethics counsel within the Office of Ethics Counsel-- ``(i) may not be employed by the Court on the date of enactment of this section; ``(ii) shall be appointed by the chief ethics counsel; ``(iii) shall serve not more than two 6- year terms; and ``(iv) shall receive an annual rate of pay of at least $180,000. ``(2) Qualifications.--Each counsel of the Office of Ethics Counsel shall-- ``(A) be licensed to practice law in a State or territory of the United States and a member of the bar in good standing; and ``(B) possess at least 5 years of experience as a practicing attorney. ``(3) Expertise.--Each counsel shall be an individual of exceptional public standing who is specifically qualified to serve within the Office of Ethics Counsel by virtue of the individual's education, training, and experience, as determined by the Chief Justice. ``(4) Termination of counsels.--The employment of a counsel may only be terminated by the Chief Justice for cause. ``(c) Training.--On a biannual basis, the Office of Ethics Counsel shall provide, and each justice shall take, a training course on the judicial ethics matters described in subsection (a)(2). ``(d) Report.--On an annual basis, the chief ethics counsel shall submit to the Committees on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and of the Senate a report on the ethics advice given by the Office of Ethics Counsel during the previous year, including-- ``(1) the number of times advice was sought and given; ``(2) whether the advice was sought by judicial officers or by judicial employees; ``(3) information about the topics covered by the advice given, including the number of questions related to gifts, financial disclosures, nonpublic information, and political activity; ``(4) the number and types of mitigation measures that were recommended, including recusal, divestiture, resignation; ``(5) the number of times advice described in this subsection was not followed by the individual to whom it was given, if known by the Office. ``(e) Definitions.--In this section: ``(1) The term `gift' means any gratuity, favor, discount, entertainment, hospitality, loan, forbearance, or other item having monetary value. The term includes services as well as gifts of training, transportation, local travel, lodgings and meals, whether provided in-kind, by purchase of a ticket, payment in advance, or reimbursement after the expense has been incurred. ``(2) The term `political activity' means political engagements, such as paid speaking events, fundraisers, or donations to political parties, politicians, political action groups, or endorsements of political candidates.''. (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents of chapter 45 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 678 the following: ``678. Office of Ethics Counsel.''. SEC. 3. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIVE COUNSEL WITHIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. (a) In General.--Chapter 45 of title 28, United States Code, as amended by this Act, is further amended by adding at the end the following: ``Sec. 679. Office of Investigative Counsel ``(a) Office of Investigative Counsel.--The Chief Justice is authorized to establish an Office of Investigative Counsel within the Supreme Court of the United States-- ``(1) constituted by one Chief Investigative Counsel and at least two additional investigative counsels; and ``(2) to review and investigate ethics complaints against justices arising from their actions or the actions of their spouses and dependents. ``(b) Investigative Counsels.-- ``(1) Staffing and compensation of counsels.-- ``(A) Chief investigative counsel.--The Chief Investigative Counsel-- ``(i) may not be employed by the court on the date of enactment of this section; ``(ii) shall be appointed by the Chief Justice; ``(iii) shall serve not more than one 6- year term; and ``(iv) shall receive an annual rate of pay of at least $225,000. ``(B) Additional investigative counsels.--The investigative counsels-- ``(i) may not be employed by the court on the date of enactment of this section; ``(ii) shall be appointed by the Chief Investigative Counsel; ``(iii) shall serve at the pleasure of the Chief Investigative Counsel; and ``(iv) shall receive an annual rate of pay of at least $180,000. ``(C) Qualifications.--Each investigative counsel of the Office of Investigative Counsel shall-- ``(i) be licensed to practice law in a State or territory of the United States and a member of the bar in good standing; and ``(ii) possess at least 7 years of experience as a practicing attorney. ``(D) Expertise.--Each investigative counsel and the Chief Investigative Counsel shall be an individual of exceptional public standing who is specifically qualified to serve within the Office of Investigative Counsel by virtue of the individual's education, training, and experience. ``(E) Termination of counsels.--The employment of the Chief Investigative Counsel may only be terminated by the Chief Justice for cause. ``(2) Subpoena power.-- ``(A) In general.--For the discharge of their duties, the Chief Investigative Counsel shall have the authority to issue subpoenas to compel witnesses to appear and testify and to produce books, papers, correspondence, memoranda, documents, or other relevant records. The Chief Investigative Counsel may issue subpoenas requiring the attendance and testimony of witnesses and the production of any evidence relating to any matter under investigation by the Office of Investigative Counsel, which the Office is empowered to investigate by this section. The attendance of witnesses and the production of evidence may be required from any place within the United States at any designated place of hearing within the United States. ``(B) Failure to obey a subpoena.--If a person refuses to obey a subpoena issued under subparagraph (A), the Chief Investigative Counsel may apply to a United States district court for an order requiring that person to appear before the Office of Investigative Counsel to give testimony, produce evidence, or both, relating to the matter under investigation. The application may be made within the judicial district where the hearing is conducted or where that person is found, resides, or transacts business. Any failure to obey the order of the court shall be punishable by contempt of court. ``(C) Service of subpoenas.--The subpoenas of the Office of Investigative Counsel shall be served in the manner provided for subpoenas issued by a United States district court under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for the United States district courts. ``(D) Service of process.--All process of any court to which application is made under subparagraph (B) may be served in the judicial district in which the person required to be served resides or may be found. ``(c) Ethics Complaints.-- ``(1) Filing.--An ethics complaint against a justice may be filed with the Office of Investigate Counsel by-- ``(A) the chair or ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives or of the Senate; ``(B) the Majority Leader or Minority Leader of the Senate; or ``(C) the Speaker or the Minority Leader of the House of Representatives. ``(2) Review.--Not later than 60 days after an ethics complaint is filed under paragraph (1), the Office of Investigative Counsel shall review the complaint and determine whether a full investigation is appropriate. In making a determination under this paragraph, the Office shall consider whether the alleged behavior of a justice violates the Code of Conduct of the Supreme Court, the Judicial Code of Conduct, or any applicable law or regulation. Upon making a determination under this paragraph, the chief counsel shall respond to each ethics complaint filed under paragraph (1), regardless of whether the Office of Investigative Counsel determines that an investigation is appropriate. ``(3) Investigation.--If the Office determines that a full investigation is appropriate, it shall open the investigation not later than 15 days after making such determination. ``(4) Reporting.-- ``(A) In general.--The Office of Investigative Counsel shall submit to the Chief Justice a report containing its findings and recommendations about an ethics complaint filed under paragraph (2) (including in the case of a complaint with respect to which the Office determines that no violation has occurred), except that in the case of an ethics complaint with respect to which the Chief Justice is the subject, the Office shall deliver such report to the most senior associate justice. ``(B) Contents.--A report under subparagraph (A) shall include-- ``(i) each violation of the Code of Conduct for the Supreme Court committed by the justice who was the subject of the investigation under paragraph (3), including any such violation that arose as a result of the actions of a spouse or dependant of the justice; and ``(ii) substantive and actionable recommendations from the Office of Investigative Counsel including recusal, divestment and neutralization conflicts of interest, and other remedies. ``(C) Publication.-- ``(i) Chief justice.--The Chief Justice may, in his sole discretion, release to the public a report received under subparagraph (A), but may not alter such a report in any way, except to redact any classified or personally identifiable information. In the case of an ethics complaint with respect to which the Chief Justice is the subject, the most senior associate justice is authorized to carry out this clause. ``(ii) Availability to congress.--Not later than 10 days after completing a report under subparagraph (A), the Office of Investigative Counsel shall make the report available to-- ``(I) the Committees on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and of the Senate; ``(II) the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of the House of Representatives; and ``(III) the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate. ``(iii) Duty to inform the attorney general.--In carrying out the duties of the Office, the Investigative Counsel shall report expeditiously to the Attorney General whenever the Investigative Counsel has reasonable grounds to believe there has been a violation of Federal criminal law.''. (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents of chapter 45 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 678, as added by section 2, the following: ``679. Office of Investigative Counsel.''. SEC. 4. SEVERABILITY. If any provision of this Act, or any application of such provision to any person or circumstance, is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of this Act and the application of this Act to any other person or circumstance shall not be affected. <all>\n\nSUMMARY TO EVALUATE:\nTitle: Supreme Court Ethics and Investigations Act\nSummary: This bill establishes new offices within the Supreme Court to provide ethics guidance and investigate potential misconduct by Justices and their families. It aims to ensure greater accountability and transparency regarding financial disclosures and conflicts of interest.\nKey Points: Establishment of an Office of Ethics Counsel to advise Justices and their spouses on ethical matters., Mandatory ethics training for all Supreme Court Justices every two years., Creation of an Investigative Counsel with subpoena powers to probe ethics complaints., Formal process for Congressional leaders to file ethics complaints against Justices., Requirement to report findings to Congress and notify the Attorney General of potential crimes.\n\nZASADY OCENY:\n1. Sprawdź wszystkie LICZBY, DATY i KWOTY w SUMMARY. Jeśli którejś brakuje w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n2. Sprawdź wszystkie NAZWISKA, ORGANIZACJE i MIEJSCA w SUMMARY. Jeśli którejś brakuje w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n3. Sprawdź wszystkie konkretne DZIAŁANIA PRAWNE . Jeśli tego mechanizmu nie ma w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n\nWAŻNE: Abstrakcyjne pojęcia (np. \"transparentność\", \"zaufanie\") są dozwolone jako wnioski.\n\nOUTPUT (JSON):\n{\n  \"is_valid\": true/false,\n  \"issue\": \"fabricated_entity\" / \"contradiction\" / \"none\"\n}\n\nWYMAGANIA FORMATOWANIA:\n1. Odpowiedz WYŁĄCZNIE surowym obiektem JSON.\n2. NIE używaj bloków kodu Markdown.\n3. NIE dodawaj żadnych wstępów ani wyjaśnień przed ani po JSONie.\n4. JSON musi być poprawny i gotowy do parsowania.\n\n",
      "ai_response_raw": "{\n  \"is_valid\": true,\n  \"issue\": \"none\"\n}"
    },
    {
      "timestamp": "2026-03-25T12:14:24.229Z",
      "source_url": "https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/hr7692/BILLS-119hr7692ih.htm",
      "model": "gemini-flash-latest",
      "prompt_sent": "\nJesteś ekspertem od prawa Stanów Zjednoczonych, który ma za zadanie analizować dokumenty ustaw, uchwał oraz innych dokumentów legislacyjnych, a następnie przygotowywać z nich informacje w przystępny sposób dla obywateli. Twoim celem jest przedstawienie informacji tak, aby obywatele mogli sami ocenić wpływ legislacji na ich życie, nawet bez posiadania specjalistycznej wiedzy legislacyjnej. Skup się na faktach i obiektywnych skutkach wprowadzanych zmian, unikając wartościowania i osobistych opinii. Wszelki żargon prawny jest zabroniony. Prezentuj informacje w jasny, zwięzły i angażujący sposób, tak aby były zrozumiałe dla osoby bez wykształcenia prawniczego. Unikaj długich, złożonych zdań. Zamiast pisać \"projekt ma na celu nowelizację kodeksu podatkowego...\", napisz \"Zmiany w podatkach: nowe ulgi i obowiązki dla...\". Kontynuuj swoją pracę, dopóki nie rozwiążesz swojego zadania. Jeśli nie masz pewności co do generowanej treści, przeanalizuj dokument ponownie – nie zgaduj. Rozplanuj dobrze swoje zadanie przed przystąpieniem do niego. W podsumowaniu i kluczowych punktach, jeśli to możliwe i uzasadnione, podkreśl, jakie konkretne korzyści lub skutki (pozytywne lub negatywne) wprowadza ustawa dla życia codziennego obywateli, ich praw i obowiązków, finansów osobistych, bezpieczeństwa i innych ważnych kwestii (np. kategorycznych zakazów i nakazów czy najważniejszych konkretnych alokacji finansowych i terytorialnych).\n\nTwoja odpowiedź MUSI być w formacie JSON - i zawierać następujące klucze.\nZanim zwrócisz odpowiedź, dokładnie zweryfikuj, czy cała struktura JSON jest w 100% poprawna, włącznie ze wszystkimi przecinkami, nawiasami klamrowymi, kwadratowymi oraz cudzysłowami. Błędny JSON jest nieakceptowalny i uniemożliwi przetworzenie Twojej pracy.\n\nPrzeanalizuj dokładnie poniższy tekst dokumentu prawnego. To jest treść, na podstawie której masz wygenerować podsumowanie i kluczowe punkty:\n--- POCZĄTEK DOKUMENTU ---\n[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.R. 7692 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 7692 To amend title 28, United States Code, to establish an Office of Ethics Counsel and an Office of Investigative Counsel within the Supreme Court of the United States. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES February 25, 2026 Mr. Goldman of New York (for himself, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Mr. Nadler, Ms. Norton, Mr. Tonko, Mr. Thanedar, Ms. Garcia of Texas, Mr. Krishnamoorthi, Mr. Ivey, and Mr. Landsman) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To amend title 28, United States Code, to establish an Office of Ethics Counsel and an Office of Investigative Counsel within the Supreme Court of the United States. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Supreme Court Ethics and Investigations Act''. SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE OFFICE OF ETHICS COUNSEL WITHIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. (a) In General.--Chapter 45 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: ``Sec. 678. Office of Ethics Counsel ``(a) The Office of Ethics Counsel.--The Chief Justice is authorized to establish an Office of Ethics Counsel within the Supreme Court of the United States-- ``(1) constituted by one chief ethics counsel who may employ such officers and employees, subject to the provisions of title 5, governing appointments in the competitive service, and the provisions of chapter 51 and subchapter III of chapter 53 of such title relating to classification and General Schedule pay rates; and ``(2) to advise and provide guidance to justices of the Supreme Court, and their spouses, on matters of judicial ethics, including-- ``(A) financial disclosure requirements; ``(B) the acceptance of gifts; ``(C) political activity; ``(D) conflicts of interest and recusal; and ``(E) the unauthorized disclosure of official Court documents. ``(b) Ethics Counsels.-- ``(1) Staffing and compensation of counsels.-- ``(A) Chief ethics counsel.--The chief ethics counsel within the Office of Ethics Counsel-- ``(i) may not be employed by the Court on the date of enactment of this section; ``(ii) shall be appointed by the Chief Justice; ``(iii) shall serve not more than two 6- year terms; and ``(iv) shall receive an annual rate of pay of at least $225,000. ``(B) Other counsels.--Any counsel other than the chief ethics counsel within the Office of Ethics Counsel-- ``(i) may not be employed by the Court on the date of enactment of this section; ``(ii) shall be appointed by the chief ethics counsel; ``(iii) shall serve not more than two 6- year terms; and ``(iv) shall receive an annual rate of pay of at least $180,000. ``(2) Qualifications.--Each counsel of the Office of Ethics Counsel shall-- ``(A) be licensed to practice law in a State or territory of the United States and a member of the bar in good standing; and ``(B) possess at least 5 years of experience as a practicing attorney. ``(3) Expertise.--Each counsel shall be an individual of exceptional public standing who is specifically qualified to serve within the Office of Ethics Counsel by virtue of the individual's education, training, and experience, as determined by the Chief Justice. ``(4) Termination of counsels.--The employment of a counsel may only be terminated by the Chief Justice for cause. ``(c) Training.--On a biannual basis, the Office of Ethics Counsel shall provide, and each justice shall take, a training course on the judicial ethics matters described in subsection (a)(2). ``(d) Report.--On an annual basis, the chief ethics counsel shall submit to the Committees on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and of the Senate a report on the ethics advice given by the Office of Ethics Counsel during the previous year, including-- ``(1) the number of times advice was sought and given; ``(2) whether the advice was sought by judicial officers or by judicial employees; ``(3) information about the topics covered by the advice given, including the number of questions related to gifts, financial disclosures, nonpublic information, and political activity; ``(4) the number and types of mitigation measures that were recommended, including recusal, divestiture, resignation; ``(5) the number of times advice described in this subsection was not followed by the individual to whom it was given, if known by the Office. ``(e) Definitions.--In this section: ``(1) The term `gift' means any gratuity, favor, discount, entertainment, hospitality, loan, forbearance, or other item having monetary value. The term includes services as well as gifts of training, transportation, local travel, lodgings and meals, whether provided in-kind, by purchase of a ticket, payment in advance, or reimbursement after the expense has been incurred. ``(2) The term `political activity' means political engagements, such as paid speaking events, fundraisers, or donations to political parties, politicians, political action groups, or endorsements of political candidates.''. (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents of chapter 45 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 678 the following: ``678. Office of Ethics Counsel.''. SEC. 3. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIVE COUNSEL WITHIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. (a) In General.--Chapter 45 of title 28, United States Code, as amended by this Act, is further amended by adding at the end the following: ``Sec. 679. Office of Investigative Counsel ``(a) Office of Investigative Counsel.--The Chief Justice is authorized to establish an Office of Investigative Counsel within the Supreme Court of the United States-- ``(1) constituted by one Chief Investigative Counsel and at least two additional investigative counsels; and ``(2) to review and investigate ethics complaints against justices arising from their actions or the actions of their spouses and dependents. ``(b) Investigative Counsels.-- ``(1) Staffing and compensation of counsels.-- ``(A) Chief investigative counsel.--The Chief Investigative Counsel-- ``(i) may not be employed by the court on the date of enactment of this section; ``(ii) shall be appointed by the Chief Justice; ``(iii) shall serve not more than one 6- year term; and ``(iv) shall receive an annual rate of pay of at least $225,000. ``(B) Additional investigative counsels.--The investigative counsels-- ``(i) may not be employed by the court on the date of enactment of this section; ``(ii) shall be appointed by the Chief Investigative Counsel; ``(iii) shall serve at the pleasure of the Chief Investigative Counsel; and ``(iv) shall receive an annual rate of pay of at least $180,000. ``(C) Qualifications.--Each investigative counsel of the Office of Investigative Counsel shall-- ``(i) be licensed to practice law in a State or territory of the United States and a member of the bar in good standing; and ``(ii) possess at least 7 years of experience as a practicing attorney. ``(D) Expertise.--Each investigative counsel and the Chief Investigative Counsel shall be an individual of exceptional public standing who is specifically qualified to serve within the Office of Investigative Counsel by virtue of the individual's education, training, and experience. ``(E) Termination of counsels.--The employment of the Chief Investigative Counsel may only be terminated by the Chief Justice for cause. ``(2) Subpoena power.-- ``(A) In general.--For the discharge of their duties, the Chief Investigative Counsel shall have the authority to issue subpoenas to compel witnesses to appear and testify and to produce books, papers, correspondence, memoranda, documents, or other relevant records. The Chief Investigative Counsel may issue subpoenas requiring the attendance and testimony of witnesses and the production of any evidence relating to any matter under investigation by the Office of Investigative Counsel, which the Office is empowered to investigate by this section. The attendance of witnesses and the production of evidence may be required from any place within the United States at any designated place of hearing within the United States. ``(B) Failure to obey a subpoena.--If a person refuses to obey a subpoena issued under subparagraph (A), the Chief Investigative Counsel may apply to a United States district court for an order requiring that person to appear before the Office of Investigative Counsel to give testimony, produce evidence, or both, relating to the matter under investigation. The application may be made within the judicial district where the hearing is conducted or where that person is found, resides, or transacts business. Any failure to obey the order of the court shall be punishable by contempt of court. ``(C) Service of subpoenas.--The subpoenas of the Office of Investigative Counsel shall be served in the manner provided for subpoenas issued by a United States district court under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for the United States district courts. ``(D) Service of process.--All process of any court to which application is made under subparagraph (B) may be served in the judicial district in which the person required to be served resides or may be found. ``(c) Ethics Complaints.-- ``(1) Filing.--An ethics complaint against a justice may be filed with the Office of Investigate Counsel by-- ``(A) the chair or ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives or of the Senate; ``(B) the Majority Leader or Minority Leader of the Senate; or ``(C) the Speaker or the Minority Leader of the House of Representatives. ``(2) Review.--Not later than 60 days after an ethics complaint is filed under paragraph (1), the Office of Investigative Counsel shall review the complaint and determine whether a full investigation is appropriate. In making a determination under this paragraph, the Office shall consider whether the alleged behavior of a justice violates the Code of Conduct of the Supreme Court, the Judicial Code of Conduct, or any applicable law or regulation. Upon making a determination under this paragraph, the chief counsel shall respond to each ethics complaint filed under paragraph (1), regardless of whether the Office of Investigative Counsel determines that an investigation is appropriate. ``(3) Investigation.--If the Office determines that a full investigation is appropriate, it shall open the investigation not later than 15 days after making such determination. ``(4) Reporting.-- ``(A) In general.--The Office of Investigative Counsel shall submit to the Chief Justice a report containing its findings and recommendations about an ethics complaint filed under paragraph (2) (including in the case of a complaint with respect to which the Office determines that no violation has occurred), except that in the case of an ethics complaint with respect to which the Chief Justice is the subject, the Office shall deliver such report to the most senior associate justice. ``(B) Contents.--A report under subparagraph (A) shall include-- ``(i) each violation of the Code of Conduct for the Supreme Court committed by the justice who was the subject of the investigation under paragraph (3), including any such violation that arose as a result of the actions of a spouse or dependant of the justice; and ``(ii) substantive and actionable recommendations from the Office of Investigative Counsel including recusal, divestment and neutralization conflicts of interest, and other remedies. ``(C) Publication.-- ``(i) Chief justice.--The Chief Justice may, in his sole discretion, release to the public a report received under subparagraph (A), but may not alter such a report in any way, except to redact any classified or personally identifiable information. In the case of an ethics complaint with respect to which the Chief Justice is the subject, the most senior associate justice is authorized to carry out this clause. ``(ii) Availability to congress.--Not later than 10 days after completing a report under subparagraph (A), the Office of Investigative Counsel shall make the report available to-- ``(I) the Committees on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and of the Senate; ``(II) the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of the House of Representatives; and ``(III) the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate. ``(iii) Duty to inform the attorney general.--In carrying out the duties of the Office, the Investigative Counsel shall report expeditiously to the Attorney General whenever the Investigative Counsel has reasonable grounds to believe there has been a violation of Federal criminal law.''. (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents of chapter 45 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 678, as added by section 2, the following: ``679. Office of Investigative Counsel.''. SEC. 4. SEVERABILITY. If any provision of this Act, or any application of such provision to any person or circumstance, is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of this Act and the application of this Act to any other person or circumstance shall not be affected. <all>\n--- KONIEC DOKUMENTU ---\n\nPAMIĘTAJ: Twoja odpowiedź MUSI być wyłącznie poprawnym obiektem JSON. Nie dodawaj żadnych dodatkowych znaków, komentarzy ani tekstu przed znacznikiem '{' ani po znaczniku '}'. Cała odpowiedź musi być parsowalna jako JSON.\nNa podstawie POWYŻSZEGO dokumentu, wypełnij poniższą strukturę JSON:\nOto struktura JSON, której oczekuję (wypełnij ją treścią):\n{\n  \"pl_ai_title\": \"Nowy, krótki tytuł dla aktu prawnego po polsku, oddający sedno wprowadzanych zmian (np. maksymalnie 10-12 słów).\",\n  \"pl_summary\": \"2-3 zdania zwięzłego podsumowania treści aktu prawnego po polsku, napisane z perspektywy wpływu na życie codzienne obywateli.\",\n  \"pl_key_points\": [\n    \"Pierwszy krótki punkt po polsku dotyczący najważniejszych wprowadzanych rozwiązań lub zmian.\",\n    \"Drugi krótki punkt po polsku...\"\n  ],\n  \"eng_ai_title\": \"A new, short title for the legal act in English, capturing the essence of the changes (e.g., max 10-12 words).\",\n  \"eng_summary\": \"2-3 sentences summarizing the legal act in English, from the perspective of its impact on citizens' daily lives.\",\n  \"eng_key_points\": [\n    \"First short bullet point in English regarding the most important solutions or changes being introduced.\",\n    \"Second short bullet point in English...\"\n  ],\n  \"de_ai_title\": \"Ein neuer, kurzer Titel für das Rechtsdokument auf Deutsch, der den Kern der Änderungen erfasst (z.B. max. 10-12 Wörter).\",\n  \"de_summary\": \"2-3 Sätze Zusammenfassung des Rechtsdokuments auf Deutsch, aus der Perspektive seiner Auswirkungen auf das tägliche Leben der Bürger.\",\n  \"de_key_points\": [\n    \"Erster kurzer Stichpunkt auf Deutsch zu den wichtigsten eingeführten Lösungen oder Änderungen.\",\n    \"Zweiter kurzer Stichpunkt auf Deutsch...\"\n  ],\n  \"fr_ai_title\": \"Un nouveau titre court pour l'acte juridique en français, saisissant l'essence des changements (par exemple, 10-12 mots maximum).\",\n  \"fr_summary\": \"Résumé de 2-3 phrases de l'acte juridique en français, du point de vue de son impact sur la vie quotidienne des citoyens.\",\n  \"fr_key_points\": [\n    \"Premier court point en français concernant les solutions ou changements les plus importants introduits.\",\n    \"Deuxième court point en français...\"\n  ],\n  \"es_ai_title\": \"Un nuevo título breve para el acto jurídico en español, que recoja la esencia de los cambios (por ejemplo, máximo 10-12 palabras).\",\n  \"es_summary\": \"Resumen de 2-3 frases del acto jurídico en español, desde la perspectiva de su impacto en la vida cotidiana de los ciudadanos.\",\n  \"es_key_points\": [\n    \"Primer punto breve en español sobre las soluciones o cambios más importantes que se introducen.\",\n    \"Segundo punto breve en español...\"\n  ],\n  \"it_ai_title\": \"Un nuovo titolo breve per l'atto giuridico in italiano, che colga l'essenza delle modifiche (ad es. massimo 10-12 parole).\",\n  \"it_summary\": \"Riepilogo di 2-3 frasi dell'atto giuridico in italiano, dal punto di vista del suo impatto sulla vita quotidiana dei cittadini.\",\n  \"it_key_points\": [\n    \"Primo breve punto in italiano riguardante le soluzioni o le modifiche più importanti introdotte.\",\n    \"Secondo breve punto in italiano...\"\n  ],\n  \"nl_ai_title\": \"Een nieuwe, korte titel voor de rechtshandeling in het Nederlands, die de essentie van de wijzigingen weergeeft (bijv. max. 10-12 woorden).\",\n  \"nl_summary\": \"Samenvatting van 2-3 zinnen van de rechtshandeling in het Nederlands, vanuit het perspectief van de impact op het dagelijks leven van burgers.\",\n  \"nl_key_points\": [\n    \"Eerste korte punt in het Nederlands betreffende de belangrijkste geïntroduceerde oplossingen of wijzigingen.\",\n    \"Tweede korte punt in het Nederlands...\"\n  ],\n  \"pt_ai_title\": \"Um novo título curto para o ato jurídico em português, capturando a essência das mudanças (por exemplo, máx. 10-12 palavras).\",\n  \"pt_summary\": \"Resumo de 2-3 frases do ato jurídico em português, na perspetiva do seu impacto na vida quotidiana dos cidadãos.\",\n  \"pt_key_points\": [\n    \"Primeiro ponto curto em português sobre as soluções ou alterações mais importantes introduzidas.\",\n    \"Segundo ponto curto em português...\"\n  ],\n  \"category\": [\"Categorize the document into one category by default, based on the field it primarily concerns. Choose up to 3 if the document also touches upon SIGNIFICANT issues from other categories. You MUST select categories ONLY from the following list: Health, Education, Family, Taxes, Labor, Security, Environment, Courts and Law, Transport, Benefits, Real Estate, Media and Culture, Local Government, Migration, Agriculture, Public Investments, Informatization, Economy. If the document does not definitively fit any of these, you MUST use \"Other\". If you use \"Other\", it should be the ONLY category selected. Do NOT invent new categories. The response must be an array of strings, e.g., [\"Taxes\", \"Family\"].\"]\n}\n\n",
      "ai_response_raw": "{\n  \"pl_ai_title\": \"Ustawa o etyce i dochodzeniach w Sądzie Najwyższym USA\",\n  \"pl_summary\": \"Projekt wprowadza nowe urzędy odpowiedzialne za nadzór nad etyką sędziów Sądu Najwyższego oraz badanie skarg na ich zachowanie. Zmiany mają na celu zwiększenie przejrzystości działań sędziów i ich rodzin w kwestiach finansowych oraz konfliktów interesów.\",\n  \"pl_key_points\": [\n    \"Utworzenie Biura Doradztwa Etycznego dla sędziów i ich małżonków w sprawach prezentów i finansów.\",\n    \"Wprowadzenie obowiązkowych szkoleń z etyki dla sędziów odbywających się co dwa lata.\",\n    \"Powołanie Biura Dochodzeniowego z uprawnieniami do wzywania świadków i żądania dokumentów.\",\n    \"Umożliwienie liderom Kongresu składania oficjalnych skarg etycznych na sędziów.\",\n    \"Obowiązek publikowania raportów z dochodzeń i informowania o możliwych przestępstwach.\"\n  ],\n  \"eng_ai_title\": \"Supreme Court Ethics and Investigations Act\",\n  \"eng_summary\": \"This bill establishes new offices within the Supreme Court to provide ethics guidance and investigate potential misconduct by Justices and their families. It aims to ensure greater accountability and transparency regarding financial disclosures and conflicts of interest.\",\n  \"eng_key_points\": [\n    \"Establishment of an Office of Ethics Counsel to advise Justices and their spouses on ethical matters.\",\n    \"Mandatory ethics training for all Supreme Court Justices every two years.\",\n    \"Creation of an Investigative Counsel with subpoena powers to probe ethics complaints.\",\n    \"Formal process for Congressional leaders to file ethics complaints against Justices.\",\n    \"Requirement to report findings to Congress and notify the Attorney General of potential crimes.\"\n  ],\n  \"de_ai_title\": \"Gesetz über Ethik und Untersuchungen am Obersten Gerichtshof der USA\",\n  \"de_summary\": \"Dieser Gesetzentwurf sieht die Einrichtung neuer Stellen vor, die die Richter des Obersten Gerichtshofs in Ethikfragen beraten und Beschwerden untersuchen. Ziel ist es, die Transparenz bei Finanzen und möglichen Interessenkonflikten der Richter und ihrer Familien zu erhöhen.\",\n  \"de_key_points\": [\n    \"Einrichtung eines Büros für Ethikberatung für Richter und deren Ehepartner zu Geschenken und Finanzen.\",\n    \"Verpflichtende Ethik-Schulungen für alle Richter des Obersten Gerichtshofs alle zwei Jahre.\",\n    \"Schaffung eines Ermittlungsbüros mit der Befugnis, Zeugen vorzuladen und Dokumente anzufordern.\",\n    \"Verfahren für Kongressführer zur Einreichung von Ethikbeschwerden gegen Richter.\",\n    \"Pflicht zur Veröffentlichung von Untersuchungsberichten und Meldung von Straftaten an das Justizministerium.\"\n  ],\n  \"fr_ai_title\": \"Loi sur l'éthique et les enquêtes à la Cour suprême des États-Unis\",\n  \"fr_summary\": \"Ce projet de loi crée deux nouveaux bureaux au sein de la Cour suprême pour conseiller les juges sur l'éthique et enquêter sur d'éventuels manquements. Il vise à renforcer la transparence concernant les finances et les conflits d'intérêts des juges et de leurs familles.\",\n  \"fr_key_points\": [\n    \"Création d'un Bureau de conseil en éthique pour les juges et leurs conjoints sur les cadeaux et finances.\",\n    \"Formation obligatoire à l'éthique pour tous les juges de la Cour suprême tous les deux ans.\",\n    \"Mise en place d'un Bureau d'enquête avec pouvoir d'assignation à comparaître pour les témoins.\",\n    \"Procédure permettant aux chefs du Congrès de déposer des plaintes pour violation de l'éthique.\",\n    \"Obligation de publier les rapports d'enquête et de signaler les crimes potentiels au procureur général.\"\n  ],\n  \"es_ai_title\": \"Ley de Ética e Investigaciones de la Corte Suprema de EE. UU.\",\n  \"es_summary\": \"Este proyecto de ley establece oficinas dentro de la Corte Suprema para asesorar a los jueces en ética e investigar posibles conductas indebidas. Busca aumentar la transparencia sobre las finanzas y los conflictos de intereses de los jueces y sus familias.\",\n  \"es_key_points\": [\n    \"Creación de una Oficina de Asesoría Ética para jueces y sus cónyuges sobre regalos y finanzas.\",\n    \"Capacitación obligatoria en ética para todos los jueces de la Corte Suprema cada dos años.\",\n    \"Establecimiento de una Oficina de Investigación con poder para citar testigos y exigir documentos.\",\n    \"Proceso para que los líderes del Congreso presenten quejas éticas contra los jueces.\",\n    \"Obligación de publicar informes de investigación y notificar posibles delitos al Fiscal General.\"\n  ],\n  \"it_ai_title\": \"Legge sull'etica e le indagini della Corte Suprema degli Stati Uniti\",\n  \"it_summary\": \"Questo disegno di legge istituisce nuovi uffici presso la Corte Suprema per fornire consulenza etica e indagare su potenziali illeciti dei giudici. L'obiettivo è garantire maggiore trasparenza riguardo alle finanze e ai conflitti di interesse dei magistrati e delle loro famiglie.\",\n  \"it_key_points\": [\n    \"Istituzione di un Ufficio di consulenza etica per i giudici e i loro coniugi su regali e finanze.\",\n    \"Formazione etica obbligatoria per tutti i giudici della Corte Suprema ogni due anni.\",\n    \"Creazione di un Ufficio investigativo con poteri di citazione di testimoni e richiesta di documenti.\",\n    \"Procedura per i leader del Congresso per presentare reclami etici contro i giudici.\",\n    \"Obbligo di pubblicare i rapporti investigativi e segnalare potenziali reati al Procuratore Generale.\"\n  ],\n  \"nl_ai_title\": \"Wet op Ethiek en Onderzoek bij het Amerikaanse Hooggerechtshof\",\n  \"nl_summary\": \"Dit wetsvoorstel voert nieuwe bureaus in bij het Hooggerechtshof om rechters te adviseren over ethiek en klachten over hun gedrag te onderzoeken. Het doel is om de transparantie rondom financiën en belangenverstrengeling van rechters en hun gezinnen te vergroten.\",\n  \"nl_key_points\": [\n    \"Oprichting van een Bureau voor Ethiekadvies voor rechters en hun echtgenoten over geschenken en financiën.\",\n    \"Verplichte ethiektrainingen voor alle rechters van het Hooggerechtshof om de twee jaar.\",\n    \"Instelling van een Onderzoeksbureau met de bevoegdheid om getuigen op te roepen en documenten te eisen.\",\n    \"Procedure voor Congresleiders om ethische klachten in te dienen tegen rechters.\",\n    \"Plicht om onderzoeksrapporten te publiceren en mogelijke misdrijven te melden aan de procureur-generaal.\"\n  ],\n  \"pt_ai_title\": \"Lei de Ética e Investigações da Suprema Corte dos EUA\",\n  \"pt_summary\": \"Este projeto de lei cria gabinetes na Suprema Corte para orientar os juízes sobre ética e investigar possíveis condutas impróprias. O objetivo é aumentar a transparência sobre as finanças e conflitos de interesses dos juízes e de suas famílias.\",\n  \"pt_key_points\": [\n    \"Criação de um Gabinete de Aconselhamento Ético para juízes e cônjuges sobre presentes e finanças.\",\n    \"Formação obrigatória em ética para todos os juízes da Suprema Corte a cada dois anos.\",\n    \"Estabelecimento de um Gabinete de Investigação com poder de intimação de testemunhas e documentos.\",\n    \"Processo para que líderes do Congresso apresentem queixas éticas contra os juízes.\",\n    \"Obrigação de publicar relatórios de investigação e notificar possíveis crimes ao Procurador-Geral.\"\n  ],\n  \"category\": [\"Courts and Law\"]\n}"
    }
  ]
}