{
  "legislationId": "119_HR_7985",
  "lastUpdate": "2026-03-31T11:26:29.522Z",
  "history": [
    {
      "timestamp": "2026-03-31T11:26:29.522Z",
      "source_url": "https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/hr7985/BILLS-119hr7985ih.htm",
      "model": "gemini-flash-lite-latest",
      "prompt_sent": "\nROLE: Fact Checker.\nZADANIE: Porównaj SOURCE (oryginał) i SUMMARY (streszczenie przygotowane przez inne AI).\n\nTwoim celem jest wykrycie \"ZMYŚLONYCH KONKRETÓW\" (Fabricated Entities) w SUMMARY.\n\nSOURCE:\n[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.R. 7985 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 7985 To prohibit the marketing, advertising, or provision of professional services without the appropriate licenses, and for other purposes. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES March 18, 2026 Mr. Mullin (for himself, Ms. Matsui, Mrs. Dingell, Mr. Soto, Ms. Tlaib, Ms. McClellan, and Ms. Schrier) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To prohibit the marketing, advertising, or provision of professional services without the appropriate licenses, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Curbing Harmful AI Tools By Offering Transparency Act'' or the ``CHATBOT Act''. SEC. 2. AI CHATBOT TRANSPARENCY. (a) Prohibition; Requirement.-- (1) In general.--A covered entity may not provide the generation of output from an AI chatbot, or disseminate marketing or advertising materials, that, from the perspective of a reasonable user-- (A) indicate or imply possession of an appropriate license to practice a covered profession without, at that time, the possession of such license; and (B) falsely indicate or imply that the output is provided or verified by a human in possession of an appropriate license to practice a covered profession. (2) Imply defined.--For purposes of paragraph (1)(A), the term ``imply''-- (A) means a representation that a reasonable user would understand as claiming possession of a professional license, including a statement about credentials, qualifications, fictitious professional experience, or authoritative and conclusive recommendations, advice, or guidance that a reasonable user would understand is typically only provided by a practitioner of a covered profession; and (B) does not include providing general information, procedural guidance not specific to the circumstance of the user, or informative content that does not represent or suggest licensure. (b) Guidance.--Not later than 12 months after the date of the enactment of this section, the Commission, in consultation with relevant agencies and stakeholders, including consumer advocacy organizations and technology experts, shall provide guidance on complying with the requirements of this section. (c) Enforcement by Federal Trade Commission.-- (1) Unfair or deceptive acts or practices.--A violation of subsection (a) or a regulation promulgated under such subsection shall be treated as a violation of a regulation under section 18(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 57a(a)(1)(B)) regarding unfair or deceptive acts or practices. (2) Powers of commission.--The Federal Trade Commission shall enforce subsection (a) and a regulation promulgated under such subsection in the same manner, by the same means, and with the same jurisdiction, powers, and duties as though all applicable terms and provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 41 et seq.) were incorporated into and made a part of this section. Any person who violates subsection (a) or a regulation promulgated under such subsection shall be subject to the penalties and entitled to the privileges and immunities provided in the Federal Trade Commission Act. Nothing in this Act may be construed to limit the authority of the Commission under any other provision of law. (d) Actions by States.-- (1) In general.--In any case in which the attorney general of a State, or an official or agency of a State, has reason to believe that an interest of the residents of such State has been or is threatened or adversely affected by an act or practice in violation of subsection (a) or a regulation promulgated under such subsection, the State, as parens patriae, may bring a civil action on behalf of the residents of the State in an appropriate district court of the United States to-- (A) enjoin such act or practice; (B) enforce compliance with this subsection (a) or a regulation promulgated under such subsection; (C) obtain damages for actual monetary loss from the violation or up to $5,000 in damages for each such violation, whichever is greater, on behalf of residents State; or (D) obtain such other legal and equitable relief as the court may consider to be appropriate. (2) Notice.--Before filing an action under this subsection, the attorney general, official, or agency of the State involved shall provide to the Federal Trade Commission a written notice of such action and a copy of the complaint for such action. If the attorney general, official, or agency determines it is not feasible to provide the notice described in this paragraph before the filing of the action, the attorney general, official, or agency shall provide written notice of the action and a copy of the complaint to the Federal Trade Commission immediately upon the filing of the action. (3) Authority of the federal trade commission.-- (A) In general.--On receiving notice under paragraph (2) of an action under this subsection, the Federal Trade Commission shall have the right-- (i) to intervene in the action; (ii) upon so intervening, to be heard on all matters arising therein; and (iii) to file petitions for appeal. (B) Limitation on state action while federal action is pending.--If the Federal Trade Commission or the Attorney General of the United States has instituted a civil action for violation of this subsection (a) or a regulation promulgated under such subsection (referred to in this subparagraph as the ``Federal action''), no State attorney general, official, or agency may bring an action under this subsection during the pendency of the Federal action against any defendant named in the complaint in the Federal action for any violation of such regulation alleged in such complaint. (C) Rules of construction.-- (i) State authority.--For purposes of bringing a civil action under this subsection, nothing in this Act may be construed to prevent an attorney general, official, or agency of a State from exercising the powers conferred on the attorney general, official, or agency by the laws of such State to conduct investigations, administer oaths and affirmations, or compel the attendance of witnesses or the production of documentary and other evidence. (ii) Preservation of state authority.-- Nothing in this Act may be construed to preempt, limit, or otherwise affect or restrict the application of any State law, rule, regulation, requirement, or standard that provides a user with greater or additional rights, remedies, or protections than the rights, remedies, and protections provided under this Act, including any State law, rule, requirement, or standard governing the licensing, regulation, or discipline of a covered profession regulated under State law, including enforcement actions for the unlicensed practice of such profession. (e) Private Right of Action.-- (1) In general.--A person injured by an act or practice in violation of subsection (a) or a regulation promulgated under such subsection may bring in an appropriate district court of the United States-- (A) an action to enjoin the violation; (B) an action to recover damages for actual monetary loss from the violation, or to receive up to $5,000 in damages for each such violation, whichever is greater; or (C) both such actions. (2) Willful or knowing violations.--If the court finds that the defendant acted willfully or knowingly in committing a violation described in paragraph (1), the court may, in its discretion, increase the amount of the award to an amount equal to not more than 3 times the amount available under paragraph (1)(B). (3) Costs and attorney's fees.--The court shall award to a prevailing plaintiff in an action under this subsection the costs of such action and reasonable attorney's fees, as determined by the court. (4) Limitation.--An action may be commenced under this subsection not later than 5 years after the date on which the person first discovered or had a reasonable opportunity to discover the violation. (5) Nonexclusive remedy.--The remedy provided by this subsection shall be in addition to any other remedies available to the person. (f) Adjustment for Inflation for Civil Penalties and Damages.-- Beginning on the date that the Consumer Price Index is first published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics that is at least 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, and each year thereafter, the amount specified in subsections (d)(1)(C) and (e)(1)(B) shall be increased by the percentage increase, if any, in the Consumer Price Index published on such date from the Consumer Price Index published the previous year. (g) Definitions.--In this section: (1) Appropriate license.--The term ``appropriate license'' means a permit or authorization required to practice a covered profession, as determined by the State in which the covered entity provides the service. (2) AI chatbot.--The term ``AI chatbot'' means a system that uses artificial intelligence to engage in interactive conversations with a user similar to the communications that an individual would have with a human. (3) Artificial intelligence; ai.--The term ``artificial intelligence'' or ``AI'' has the meaning given that term in section 9401 of the National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Act of 2020 (15 U.S.C. 9401). (4) Commission.--The term ``Commission'' means the Federal Trade Commission. (5) Covered entity.--The term ``covered entity'' means an individual or company that deploys an AI chatbot. (6) Covered profession.--The term ``covered profession'' means a profession that does any of the following: (A) Operates in the finance and insurance sector (as defined in NAICS Code 52). (B) Operates in the health care and social assistance sector (as defined in NAICS Code 62). (C) Provides legal services (as defined in NAICS code 5411). (D) Provides accounting, tax preparation, bookkeeping, and payroll services (as defined in NAICS code 5412). (7) State.--The term ``State'' means each of the several States, the District of Columbia, each commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States, and each federally recognized Indian Tribe. <all>\n\nSUMMARY TO EVALUATE:\nTitle: CHATBOT Act: Preventing AI from Falsely Claiming Professional Licenses\nSummary: This bill stops AI chatbots from pretending to be licensed professionals like doctors, lawyers, or financial advisors. It ensures users aren't misled into thinking AI-generated advice is verified by a qualified human expert.\nKey Points: Prohibits AI from implying it holds professional licenses in law, health, finance, or accounting., Allows citizens to sue for at least $5,000 in damages if misled by a chatbot's professional claims., Requires transparency about whether a licensed human actually reviewed and verified the AI's output., Empowers State Attorneys General and individuals to take legal action against deceptive AI providers.\n\nZASADY OCENY:\n1. Sprawdź wszystkie LICZBY, DATY i KWOTY w SUMMARY. Jeśli którejś brakuje w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n2. Sprawdź wszystkie NAZWISKA, ORGANIZACJE i MIEJSCA w SUMMARY. Jeśli którejś brakuje w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n3. Sprawdź wszystkie konkretne DZIAŁANIA PRAWNE . Jeśli tego mechanizmu nie ma w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n\nWAŻNE: Abstrakcyjne pojęcia (np. \"transparentność\", \"zaufanie\") są dozwolone jako wnioski.\n\nOUTPUT (JSON):\n{\n  \"is_valid\": true/false,\n  \"issue\": \"fabricated_entity\" / \"contradiction\" / \"none\"\n}\n\nWYMAGANIA FORMATOWANIA:\n1. Odpowiedz WYŁĄCZNIE surowym obiektem JSON.\n2. NIE używaj bloków kodu Markdown.\n3. NIE dodawaj żadnych wstępów ani wyjaśnień przed ani po JSONie.\n4. JSON musi być poprawny i gotowy do parsowania.\n\n",
      "ai_response_raw": "{\n  \"is_valid\": true,\n  \"issue\": \"none\"\n}"
    },
    {
      "timestamp": "2026-03-31T11:15:48.889Z",
      "source_url": "https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/hr7985/BILLS-119hr7985ih.htm",
      "model": "gemini-flash-latest",
      "prompt_sent": "\nJesteś ekspertem od prawa Stanów Zjednoczonych, który ma za zadanie analizować dokumenty ustaw, uchwał oraz innych dokumentów legislacyjnych, a następnie przygotowywać z nich informacje w przystępny sposób dla obywateli. Twoim celem jest przedstawienie informacji tak, aby obywatele mogli sami ocenić wpływ legislacji na ich życie, nawet bez posiadania specjalistycznej wiedzy legislacyjnej. Skup się na faktach i obiektywnych skutkach wprowadzanych zmian, unikając wartościowania i osobistych opinii. Wszelki żargon prawny jest zabroniony. Prezentuj informacje w jasny, zwięzły i angażujący sposób, tak aby były zrozumiałe dla osoby bez wykształcenia prawniczego. Unikaj długich, złożonych zdań. Zamiast pisać \"projekt ma na celu nowelizację kodeksu podatkowego...\", napisz \"Zmiany w podatkach: nowe ulgi i obowiązki dla...\". Kontynuuj swoją pracę, dopóki nie rozwiążesz swojego zadania. Jeśli nie masz pewności co do generowanej treści, przeanalizuj dokument ponownie – nie zgaduj. Rozplanuj dobrze swoje zadanie przed przystąpieniem do niego. W podsumowaniu i kluczowych punktach, jeśli to możliwe i uzasadnione, podkreśl, jakie konkretne korzyści lub skutki (pozytywne lub negatywne) wprowadza ustawa dla życia codziennego obywateli, ich praw i obowiązków, finansów osobistych, bezpieczeństwa i innych ważnych kwestii (np. kategorycznych zakazów i nakazów czy najważniejszych konkretnych alokacji finansowych i terytorialnych).\n\nTwoja odpowiedź MUSI być w formacie JSON - i zawierać następujące klucze.\nZanim zwrócisz odpowiedź, dokładnie zweryfikuj, czy cała struktura JSON jest w 100% poprawna, włącznie ze wszystkimi przecinkami, nawiasami klamrowymi, kwadratowymi oraz cudzysłowami. Błędny JSON jest nieakceptowalny i uniemożliwi przetworzenie Twojej pracy.\n\nPrzeanalizuj dokładnie poniższy tekst dokumentu prawnego. To jest treść, na podstawie której masz wygenerować podsumowanie i kluczowe punkty:\n--- POCZĄTEK DOKUMENTU ---\n[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.R. 7985 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 7985 To prohibit the marketing, advertising, or provision of professional services without the appropriate licenses, and for other purposes. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES March 18, 2026 Mr. Mullin (for himself, Ms. Matsui, Mrs. Dingell, Mr. Soto, Ms. Tlaib, Ms. McClellan, and Ms. Schrier) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To prohibit the marketing, advertising, or provision of professional services without the appropriate licenses, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Curbing Harmful AI Tools By Offering Transparency Act'' or the ``CHATBOT Act''. SEC. 2. AI CHATBOT TRANSPARENCY. (a) Prohibition; Requirement.-- (1) In general.--A covered entity may not provide the generation of output from an AI chatbot, or disseminate marketing or advertising materials, that, from the perspective of a reasonable user-- (A) indicate or imply possession of an appropriate license to practice a covered profession without, at that time, the possession of such license; and (B) falsely indicate or imply that the output is provided or verified by a human in possession of an appropriate license to practice a covered profession. (2) Imply defined.--For purposes of paragraph (1)(A), the term ``imply''-- (A) means a representation that a reasonable user would understand as claiming possession of a professional license, including a statement about credentials, qualifications, fictitious professional experience, or authoritative and conclusive recommendations, advice, or guidance that a reasonable user would understand is typically only provided by a practitioner of a covered profession; and (B) does not include providing general information, procedural guidance not specific to the circumstance of the user, or informative content that does not represent or suggest licensure. (b) Guidance.--Not later than 12 months after the date of the enactment of this section, the Commission, in consultation with relevant agencies and stakeholders, including consumer advocacy organizations and technology experts, shall provide guidance on complying with the requirements of this section. (c) Enforcement by Federal Trade Commission.-- (1) Unfair or deceptive acts or practices.--A violation of subsection (a) or a regulation promulgated under such subsection shall be treated as a violation of a regulation under section 18(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 57a(a)(1)(B)) regarding unfair or deceptive acts or practices. (2) Powers of commission.--The Federal Trade Commission shall enforce subsection (a) and a regulation promulgated under such subsection in the same manner, by the same means, and with the same jurisdiction, powers, and duties as though all applicable terms and provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 41 et seq.) were incorporated into and made a part of this section. Any person who violates subsection (a) or a regulation promulgated under such subsection shall be subject to the penalties and entitled to the privileges and immunities provided in the Federal Trade Commission Act. Nothing in this Act may be construed to limit the authority of the Commission under any other provision of law. (d) Actions by States.-- (1) In general.--In any case in which the attorney general of a State, or an official or agency of a State, has reason to believe that an interest of the residents of such State has been or is threatened or adversely affected by an act or practice in violation of subsection (a) or a regulation promulgated under such subsection, the State, as parens patriae, may bring a civil action on behalf of the residents of the State in an appropriate district court of the United States to-- (A) enjoin such act or practice; (B) enforce compliance with this subsection (a) or a regulation promulgated under such subsection; (C) obtain damages for actual monetary loss from the violation or up to $5,000 in damages for each such violation, whichever is greater, on behalf of residents State; or (D) obtain such other legal and equitable relief as the court may consider to be appropriate. (2) Notice.--Before filing an action under this subsection, the attorney general, official, or agency of the State involved shall provide to the Federal Trade Commission a written notice of such action and a copy of the complaint for such action. If the attorney general, official, or agency determines it is not feasible to provide the notice described in this paragraph before the filing of the action, the attorney general, official, or agency shall provide written notice of the action and a copy of the complaint to the Federal Trade Commission immediately upon the filing of the action. (3) Authority of the federal trade commission.-- (A) In general.--On receiving notice under paragraph (2) of an action under this subsection, the Federal Trade Commission shall have the right-- (i) to intervene in the action; (ii) upon so intervening, to be heard on all matters arising therein; and (iii) to file petitions for appeal. (B) Limitation on state action while federal action is pending.--If the Federal Trade Commission or the Attorney General of the United States has instituted a civil action for violation of this subsection (a) or a regulation promulgated under such subsection (referred to in this subparagraph as the ``Federal action''), no State attorney general, official, or agency may bring an action under this subsection during the pendency of the Federal action against any defendant named in the complaint in the Federal action for any violation of such regulation alleged in such complaint. (C) Rules of construction.-- (i) State authority.--For purposes of bringing a civil action under this subsection, nothing in this Act may be construed to prevent an attorney general, official, or agency of a State from exercising the powers conferred on the attorney general, official, or agency by the laws of such State to conduct investigations, administer oaths and affirmations, or compel the attendance of witnesses or the production of documentary and other evidence. (ii) Preservation of state authority.-- Nothing in this Act may be construed to preempt, limit, or otherwise affect or restrict the application of any State law, rule, regulation, requirement, or standard that provides a user with greater or additional rights, remedies, or protections than the rights, remedies, and protections provided under this Act, including any State law, rule, requirement, or standard governing the licensing, regulation, or discipline of a covered profession regulated under State law, including enforcement actions for the unlicensed practice of such profession. (e) Private Right of Action.-- (1) In general.--A person injured by an act or practice in violation of subsection (a) or a regulation promulgated under such subsection may bring in an appropriate district court of the United States-- (A) an action to enjoin the violation; (B) an action to recover damages for actual monetary loss from the violation, or to receive up to $5,000 in damages for each such violation, whichever is greater; or (C) both such actions. (2) Willful or knowing violations.--If the court finds that the defendant acted willfully or knowingly in committing a violation described in paragraph (1), the court may, in its discretion, increase the amount of the award to an amount equal to not more than 3 times the amount available under paragraph (1)(B). (3) Costs and attorney's fees.--The court shall award to a prevailing plaintiff in an action under this subsection the costs of such action and reasonable attorney's fees, as determined by the court. (4) Limitation.--An action may be commenced under this subsection not later than 5 years after the date on which the person first discovered or had a reasonable opportunity to discover the violation. (5) Nonexclusive remedy.--The remedy provided by this subsection shall be in addition to any other remedies available to the person. (f) Adjustment for Inflation for Civil Penalties and Damages.-- Beginning on the date that the Consumer Price Index is first published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics that is at least 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, and each year thereafter, the amount specified in subsections (d)(1)(C) and (e)(1)(B) shall be increased by the percentage increase, if any, in the Consumer Price Index published on such date from the Consumer Price Index published the previous year. (g) Definitions.--In this section: (1) Appropriate license.--The term ``appropriate license'' means a permit or authorization required to practice a covered profession, as determined by the State in which the covered entity provides the service. (2) AI chatbot.--The term ``AI chatbot'' means a system that uses artificial intelligence to engage in interactive conversations with a user similar to the communications that an individual would have with a human. (3) Artificial intelligence; ai.--The term ``artificial intelligence'' or ``AI'' has the meaning given that term in section 9401 of the National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Act of 2020 (15 U.S.C. 9401). (4) Commission.--The term ``Commission'' means the Federal Trade Commission. (5) Covered entity.--The term ``covered entity'' means an individual or company that deploys an AI chatbot. (6) Covered profession.--The term ``covered profession'' means a profession that does any of the following: (A) Operates in the finance and insurance sector (as defined in NAICS Code 52). (B) Operates in the health care and social assistance sector (as defined in NAICS Code 62). (C) Provides legal services (as defined in NAICS code 5411). (D) Provides accounting, tax preparation, bookkeeping, and payroll services (as defined in NAICS code 5412). (7) State.--The term ``State'' means each of the several States, the District of Columbia, each commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States, and each federally recognized Indian Tribe. <all>\n--- KONIEC DOKUMENTU ---\n\nPAMIĘTAJ: Twoja odpowiedź MUSI być wyłącznie poprawnym obiektem JSON. Nie dodawaj żadnych dodatkowych znaków, komentarzy ani tekstu przed znacznikiem '{' ani po znaczniku '}'. Cała odpowiedź musi być parsowalna jako JSON.\nNa podstawie POWYŻSZEGO dokumentu, wypełnij poniższą strukturę JSON:\nOto struktura JSON, której oczekuję (wypełnij ją treścią):\n{\n  \"pl_ai_title\": \"Nowy, krótki tytuł dla aktu prawnego po polsku, oddający sedno wprowadzanych zmian (np. maksymalnie 10-12 słów).\",\n  \"pl_summary\": \"2-3 zdania zwięzłego podsumowania treści aktu prawnego po polsku, napisane z perspektywy wpływu na życie codzienne obywateli.\",\n  \"pl_key_points\": [\n    \"Pierwszy krótki punkt po polsku dotyczący najważniejszych wprowadzanych rozwiązań lub zmian.\",\n    \"Drugi krótki punkt po polsku...\"\n  ],\n  \"eng_ai_title\": \"A new, short title for the legal act in English, capturing the essence of the changes (e.g., max 10-12 words).\",\n  \"eng_summary\": \"2-3 sentences summarizing the legal act in English, from the perspective of its impact on citizens' daily lives.\",\n  \"eng_key_points\": [\n    \"First short bullet point in English regarding the most important solutions or changes being introduced.\",\n    \"Second short bullet point in English...\"\n  ],\n  \"de_ai_title\": \"Ein neuer, kurzer Titel für das Rechtsdokument auf Deutsch, der den Kern der Änderungen erfasst (z.B. max. 10-12 Wörter).\",\n  \"de_summary\": \"2-3 Sätze Zusammenfassung des Rechtsdokuments auf Deutsch, aus der Perspektive seiner Auswirkungen auf das tägliche Leben der Bürger.\",\n  \"de_key_points\": [\n    \"Erster kurzer Stichpunkt auf Deutsch zu den wichtigsten eingeführten Lösungen oder Änderungen.\",\n    \"Zweiter kurzer Stichpunkt auf Deutsch...\"\n  ],\n  \"fr_ai_title\": \"Un nouveau titre court pour l'acte juridique en français, saisissant l'essence des changements (par exemple, 10-12 mots maximum).\",\n  \"fr_summary\": \"Résumé de 2-3 phrases de l'acte juridique en français, du point de vue de son impact sur la vie quotidienne des citoyens.\",\n  \"fr_key_points\": [\n    \"Premier court point en français concernant les solutions ou changements les plus importants introduits.\",\n    \"Deuxième court point en français...\"\n  ],\n  \"es_ai_title\": \"Un nuevo título breve para el acto jurídico en español, que recoja la esencia de los cambios (por ejemplo, máximo 10-12 palabras).\",\n  \"es_summary\": \"Resumen de 2-3 frases del acto jurídico en español, desde la perspectiva de su impacto en la vida cotidiana de los ciudadanos.\",\n  \"es_key_points\": [\n    \"Primer punto breve en español sobre las soluciones o cambios más importantes que se introducen.\",\n    \"Segundo punto breve en español...\"\n  ],\n  \"it_ai_title\": \"Un nuovo titolo breve per l'atto giuridico in italiano, che colga l'essenza delle modifiche (ad es. massimo 10-12 parole).\",\n  \"it_summary\": \"Riepilogo di 2-3 frasi dell'atto giuridico in italiano, dal punto di vista del suo impatto sulla vita quotidiana dei cittadini.\",\n  \"it_key_points\": [\n    \"Primo breve punto in italiano riguardante le soluzioni o le modifiche più importanti introdotte.\",\n    \"Secondo breve punto in italiano...\"\n  ],\n  \"nl_ai_title\": \"Een nieuwe, korte titel voor de rechtshandeling in het Nederlands, die de essentie van de wijzigingen weergeeft (bijv. max. 10-12 woorden).\",\n  \"nl_summary\": \"Samenvatting van 2-3 zinnen van de rechtshandeling in het Nederlands, vanuit het perspectief van de impact op het dagelijks leven van burgers.\",\n  \"nl_key_points\": [\n    \"Eerste korte punt in het Nederlands betreffende de belangrijkste geïntroduceerde oplossingen of wijzigingen.\",\n    \"Tweede korte punt in het Nederlands...\"\n  ],\n  \"pt_ai_title\": \"Um novo título curto para o ato jurídico em português, capturando a essência das mudanças (por exemplo, máx. 10-12 palavras).\",\n  \"pt_summary\": \"Resumo de 2-3 frases do ato jurídico em português, na perspetiva do seu impacto na vida quotidiana dos cidadãos.\",\n  \"pt_key_points\": [\n    \"Primeiro ponto curto em português sobre as soluções ou alterações mais importantes introduzidas.\",\n    \"Segundo ponto curto em português...\"\n  ],\n  \"category\": [\"Categorize the document into one category by default, based on the field it primarily concerns. Choose up to 3 if the document also touches upon SIGNIFICANT issues from other categories. You MUST select categories ONLY from the following list: Health, Education, Family, Taxes, Labor, Security, Environment, Courts and Law, Transport, Benefits, Real Estate, Media and Culture, Local Government, Migration, Agriculture, Public Investments, Informatization, Economy. If the document does not definitively fit any of these, you MUST use \"Other\". If you use \"Other\", it should be the ONLY category selected. Do NOT invent new categories. The response must be an array of strings, e.g., [\"Taxes\", \"Family\"].\"]\n}\n\n",
      "ai_response_raw": "{\n  \"pl_ai_title\": \"Ustawa CHATBOT: Zakaz podszywania się sztucznej inteligencji pod licencjonowanych specjalistów\",\n  \"pl_summary\": \"Ustawa wprowadza zakaz sugerowania przez chatboty AI, że posiadają one licencje zawodowe lub że ich odpowiedzi są sprawdzane przez ekspertów. Ma to chronić obywateli przed błędnymi poradami prawnymi, medycznymi i finansowymi generowanymi przez maszyny.\",\n  \"pl_key_points\": [\n    \"Zakaz udawania przez AI posiadania uprawnień lekarskich, prawnych, finansowych lub księgowych.\",\n    \"Możliwość uzyskania odszkodowania w wysokości co najmniej 5000 USD za bycie wprowadzonym w błąd przez bota.\",\n    \"Obowiązek jasnego informowania, czy treść generowana przez AI została faktycznie zweryfikowana przez licencjonowanego człowieka.\",\n    \"Prawo obywateli do samodzielnego pozywania firm, które naruszają te zasady przejrzystości.\"\n  ],\n  \"eng_ai_title\": \"CHATBOT Act: Preventing AI from Falsely Claiming Professional Licenses\",\n  \"eng_summary\": \"This bill stops AI chatbots from pretending to be licensed professionals like doctors, lawyers, or financial advisors. It ensures users aren't misled into thinking AI-generated advice is verified by a qualified human expert.\",\n  \"eng_key_points\": [\n    \"Prohibits AI from implying it holds professional licenses in law, health, finance, or accounting.\",\n    \"Allows citizens to sue for at least $5,000 in damages if misled by a chatbot's professional claims.\",\n    \"Requires transparency about whether a licensed human actually reviewed and verified the AI's output.\",\n    \"Empowers State Attorneys General and individuals to take legal action against deceptive AI providers.\"\n  ],\n  \"de_ai_title\": \"CHATBOT-Gesetz: Verbot der Vortäuschung beruflicher Lizenzen durch KI\",\n  \"de_summary\": \"Dieses Gesetz verbietet KI-Chatbots vorzugeben, sie besäßen berufliche Lizenzen oder ihre Antworten würden von Experten geprüft. Es schützt Bürger vor irreführenden Ratschlägen in sensiblen Bereichen wie Medizin oder Recht.\",\n  \"de_key_points\": [\n    \"Verbot für KI, eine Zulassung als Arzt, Anwalt, Finanzberater oder Buchhalter vorzutäuschen.\",\n    \"Bürger können bei Verstößen Schadensersatz von mindestens 5.000 USD fordern.\",\n    \"Pflicht zur Offenlegung, ob ein Mensch mit entsprechender Lizenz die KI-Inhalte tatsächlich geprüft hat.\",\n    \"Ermöglicht Privatklagen und staatliche Maßnahmen gegen Unternehmen, die Nutzer über KI-Qualifikationen täuschen.\"\n  ],\n  \"fr_ai_title\": \"Loi CHATBOT : Interdiction pour l'IA de simuler des licences professionnelles\",\n  \"fr_summary\": \"Cette loi interdit aux chatbots d'IA de prétendre détenir des licences professionnelles ou de faire croire que leurs réponses sont validées par des experts. Elle vise à protéger les citoyens contre les conseils automatisés trompeurs.\",\n  \"fr_key_points\": [\n    \"Interdiction pour l'IA de suggérer qu'elle est un médecin, avocat, expert-comptable ou conseiller financier agréé.\",\n    \"Possibilité pour les particuliers de réclamer au moins 5 000 $ de dommages et intérêts en cas de tromperie.\",\n    \"Obligation de préciser clairement si un humain qualifié a réellement vérifié les réponses de l'IA.\",\n    \"Droit pour les citoyens et les États de poursuivre en justice les entreprises qui violent ces règles de transparence.\"\n  ],\n  \"es_ai_title\": \"Ley CHATBOT: Prohibición de que la IA finja tener licencias profesionales\",\n  \"es_summary\": \"Esta ley prohíbe que los chatbots de IA sugieran que tienen licencias profesionales o que sus respuestas son revisadas por expertos humanos. Protege a los ciudadanos de consejos médicos, legales o financieros engañosos.\",\n  \"es_key_points\": [\n    \"Prohibición de que la IA simule ser un profesional con licencia en salud, leyes, finanzas o contabilidad.\",\n    \"Los ciudadanos pueden demandar por un mínimo de 5,000 USD si son engañados por las afirmaciones del chatbot.\",\n    \"Exigencia de transparencia total sobre si un humano titulado validó realmente la información generada.\",\n    \"Faculta a los fiscales estatales y a individuos para emprender acciones legales contra proveedores de IA engañosos.\"\n  ],\n  \"it_ai_title\": \"Legge CHATBOT: Divieto per l'IA di simulare licenze professionali\",\n  \"it_summary\": \"Questa legge impedisce ai chatbot di IA di fingere di possedere licenze professionali o di far credere che i loro contenuti siano verificati da esperti. L'obiettivo è tutelare i cittadini da consulenze automatizzate ingannevoli.\",\n  \"it_key_points\": [\n    \"Divieto per l'IA di presentarsi come medico, avvocato, commercialista o consulente finanziario abilitato.\",\n    \"I cittadini possono richiedere risarcimenti a partire da 5.000 USD per le violazioni subite.\",\n    \"Obbligo di chiarire esplicitamente se un professionista umano ha effettivamente controllato l'output dell'IA.\",\n    \"Diritto per i privati e per gli Stati di citare in giudizio le aziende che usano IA in modo ingannevole.\"\n  ],\n  \"nl_ai_title\": \"CHATBOT-wet: Verbod op het veinzen van professionele licenties door AI\",\n  \"nl_summary\": \"Deze wet verbiedt AI-chatbots om te suggereren dat ze over professionele licenties beschikken of dat hun antwoorden door experts zijn gecontroleerd. Het beschermt burgers tegen misleidend advies in de zorg, het recht en de financiële sector.\",\n  \"nl_key_points\": [\n    \"Verbod voor AI om zich voor te doen als gelicentieerd arts, advocaat, accountant of financieel adviseur.\",\n    \"Burgers kunnen een schadevergoeding van minstens 5.000 USD eisen bij misleiding door een chatbot.\",\n    \"Verplichte transparantie over de vraag of een menselijke expert de AI-gegenereerde adviezen heeft gecontroleerd.\",\n    \"Geeft burgers en staten het recht om juridische stappen te ondernemen tegen bedrijven die deze regels overtreden.\"\n  ],\n  \"pt_ai_title\": \"Lei CHATBOT: Proibição de IA fingir possuir licenças profissionais\",\n  \"pt_summary\": \"Esta lei proíbe que chatbots de IA sugiram ter licenças profissionais ou que as suas respostas são validadas por especialistas humanos. Protege os cidadãos de conselhos enganosos em áreas como saúde, direito e finanças.\",\n  \"pt_key_points\": [\n    \"Proibição de a IA simular ser um médico, advogado, contabilista ou consultor financeiro licenciado.\",\n    \"Possibilidade de os cidadãos processarem por danos de, no mínimo, 5.000 USD por cada violação.\",\n    \"Obrigatoriedade de informar claramente se um humano qualificado verificou o conteúdo gerado pela máquina.\",\n    \"Permite que indivíduos e procuradores estaduais processem empresas que enganem os utilizadores sobre a IA.\"\n  ],\n  \"category\": [\n    \"Courts and Law\",\n    \"Informatization\",\n    \"Economy\"\n  ]\n}"
    }
  ]
}