{
  "legislationId": "119_HR_7989",
  "lastUpdate": "2026-03-31T11:26:59.584Z",
  "history": [
    {
      "timestamp": "2026-03-31T11:26:59.584Z",
      "source_url": "https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/hr7989/BILLS-119hr7989ih.htm",
      "model": "gemini-flash-lite-latest",
      "prompt_sent": "\nROLE: Fact Checker.\nZADANIE: Porównaj SOURCE (oryginał) i SUMMARY (streszczenie przygotowane przez inne AI).\n\nTwoim celem jest wykrycie \"ZMYŚLONYCH KONKRETÓW\" (Fabricated Entities) w SUMMARY.\n\nSOURCE:\n[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.R. 7989 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 7989 To amend the weights used to determine amounts for targeted grants and education finance incentive grants for local educational agencies under title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES March 18, 2026 Mr. Thompson of Pennsylvania (for himself and Mr. Panetta) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To amend the weights used to determine amounts for targeted grants and education finance incentive grants for local educational agencies under title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``All Children are Equal Act'' or the ``ACE Act''. SEC. 2. FINDINGS. Section 1125AA of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6336) is amended-- (1) by amending the heading to read as follows: ``SEC. 1125AA. INCREASE GRANTS PER FORMULA STUDENT AS THE PERCENTAGE OF ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED CHILDREN IN A LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCY INCREASES.''; and (2) by amending subsection (a) to read as follows: ``(a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings: ``(1) The current Basic Grant Formula for the distribution of funds under this part does not adequately target funds for schools with the highest concentrations of economically disadvantaged students. ``(2) The current formulas for distributing Targeted and Education Finance Incentive Grants is intended to allocate more funds per formula student to local educational agencies with higher concentrations of such students. ``(3) These formula use two weighting systems, one based on the percentage of the aged 5-17 population in a local education agency that is eligible to receive funds under this title (percentage weighting), and another based on the absolute number of such students (number weighting). Whichever of these weighting systems results in the highest total weighted formula student count for a local educational agency is the weighting system used for that agency in the final allocation of Targeted and Education Finance Incentive Grant funds. ``(4) Since the amount available to be distributed through these formulas is fixed by congressional appropriation, any gain in allocation share by one local educational agency causes a loss to other local educational agencies. ``(5) The number weighting alternative is often favorable to very large local educational agencies, even if the agency's formula student percentage is low. But because smaller local education agencies simply do not have enough students to gain from number weighting, they are adversely affected under the number weighting alternative. ``(6) The Congressional Research Service has compared the funding allocations of each local education agency for school year 2021-2022 under the current dual weighting system with the funding allocation it would have that year if all local educational agencies had their student count weighted only by percentage weighting. ``(7) This data shows that the use of number weighting in these formulas has shifted funding from smaller to larger local educational agencies notwithstanding the level of poverty in either. This is contrary to the intent of Congress, which is to direct more funding per formula student to local educational agencies with high concentrations of poverty, as measured by the number of formula students as a percentage of the aged 5-17 population of the local educational agency. ``(8) The National Center for Education Statistics confirmed these findings in a statistical analysis report dated May 2019. ``(9) Congress has a responsibility to correct this unintended inequity by reducing the power of the number weighting system relative to the percentage weighting system so that local educational agencies with high percentages of poverty but low numbers of students are not disadvantaged under the formulas used for grants under this part.''. SEC. 3. TARGETED GRANTS TO LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES. Section 1125(c)(2)(A) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6335(c)(2)(A)) is amended to read as follows: ``(A) In general.--For each fiscal year for which the Secretary uses local educational agency data, the weighted child count used to determine a local educational agency's grant under this section-- ``(i) for each fiscal year through fiscal year 2025, is the larger of the two amounts determined under subparagraphs (B) and (C); and ``(ii) for fiscal year 2026 and each succeeding fiscal year, is the amount determined under subparagraph (B).''. SEC. 4. EDUCATION FINANCE INCENTIVE GRANT PROGRAM. (a) States With an Equity Factor Less Than 0.10.--Section 1125A(d)(1)(B)(i) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6337(d)(1)(B)(i)) is amended to read as follows: ``(i) In general.--For each fiscal year for which the Secretary uses local educational agency data, the weighted child count used to determine a local educational agency's grant under this section-- ``(I) for each fiscal year through fiscal year 2025, is the larger of the two amounts determined under clauses (ii) and (iii); and ``(II) for fiscal year 2026 and each succeeding fiscal year, is the amount determined under clause (iii).''. (b) States With an Equity Factor Greater Than or Equal to 0.10 and Less Than 0.20.--Section 1125A(d)(2)(B)(i) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6337(d)(2)(B)(i)) is amended to read as follows: ``(i) In general.--For each fiscal year for which the Secretary uses local educational agency data, the weighted child count used to determine a local educational agency's grant under this section-- ``(I) for each fiscal year through fiscal year 2025, is the larger of the two amounts determined under clauses (ii) and (iii); and ``(II) for fiscal year 2026 and each succeeding fiscal year, is the amount determined under clause (iii).''. (c) States With an Equity Factor Greater Than or Equal to 0.20.-- Section 1125A(d)(3)(B)(i) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6337(d)(3)(B)(i)) is amended to read as follows: ``(i) In general.--For each fiscal year for which the Secretary uses local educational agency data, the weighted child count used to determine a local educational agency's grant under this section-- ``(I) for each fiscal year through fiscal year 2025, is the larger of the two amounts determined under clauses (ii) and (iii); and ``(II) for fiscal year 2026 and each succeeding fiscal year, is the amount determined under clause (iii).''. <all>\n\nSUMMARY TO EVALUATE:\nTitle: ACE Act: Fairer Funding for Schools with High Poverty Rates\nSummary: This bill changes how federal grants are distributed to schools to ensure more money goes to districts with the highest percentage of low-income students. It aims to fix a system that previously favored large cities over smaller, high-poverty communities.\nKey Points: Eliminates 'number weighting' which favored large school districts regardless of their poverty rate., Bases funding solely on the percentage of students living in poverty within a district., Ensures smaller districts get a fairer share of federal education funds starting in 2026., Corrects funding inequities to better support economically disadvantaged students.\n\nZASADY OCENY:\n1. Sprawdź wszystkie LICZBY, DATY i KWOTY w SUMMARY. Jeśli którejś brakuje w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n2. Sprawdź wszystkie NAZWISKA, ORGANIZACJE i MIEJSCA w SUMMARY. Jeśli którejś brakuje w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n3. Sprawdź wszystkie konkretne DZIAŁANIA PRAWNE . Jeśli tego mechanizmu nie ma w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n\nWAŻNE: Abstrakcyjne pojęcia (np. \"transparentność\", \"zaufanie\") są dozwolone jako wnioski.\n\nOUTPUT (JSON):\n{\n  \"is_valid\": true/false,\n  \"issue\": \"fabricated_entity\" / \"contradiction\" / \"none\"\n}\n\nWYMAGANIA FORMATOWANIA:\n1. Odpowiedz WYŁĄCZNIE surowym obiektem JSON.\n2. NIE używaj bloków kodu Markdown.\n3. NIE dodawaj żadnych wstępów ani wyjaśnień przed ani po JSONie.\n4. JSON musi być poprawny i gotowy do parsowania.\n\n",
      "ai_response_raw": "{\n  \"is_valid\": true,\n  \"issue\": \"none\"\n}"
    },
    {
      "timestamp": "2026-03-31T11:16:16.721Z",
      "source_url": "https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/hr7989/BILLS-119hr7989ih.htm",
      "model": "gemini-flash-latest",
      "prompt_sent": "\nJesteś ekspertem od prawa Stanów Zjednoczonych, który ma za zadanie analizować dokumenty ustaw, uchwał oraz innych dokumentów legislacyjnych, a następnie przygotowywać z nich informacje w przystępny sposób dla obywateli. Twoim celem jest przedstawienie informacji tak, aby obywatele mogli sami ocenić wpływ legislacji na ich życie, nawet bez posiadania specjalistycznej wiedzy legislacyjnej. Skup się na faktach i obiektywnych skutkach wprowadzanych zmian, unikając wartościowania i osobistych opinii. Wszelki żargon prawny jest zabroniony. Prezentuj informacje w jasny, zwięzły i angażujący sposób, tak aby były zrozumiałe dla osoby bez wykształcenia prawniczego. Unikaj długich, złożonych zdań. Zamiast pisać \"projekt ma na celu nowelizację kodeksu podatkowego...\", napisz \"Zmiany w podatkach: nowe ulgi i obowiązki dla...\". Kontynuuj swoją pracę, dopóki nie rozwiążesz swojego zadania. Jeśli nie masz pewności co do generowanej treści, przeanalizuj dokument ponownie – nie zgaduj. Rozplanuj dobrze swoje zadanie przed przystąpieniem do niego. W podsumowaniu i kluczowych punktach, jeśli to możliwe i uzasadnione, podkreśl, jakie konkretne korzyści lub skutki (pozytywne lub negatywne) wprowadza ustawa dla życia codziennego obywateli, ich praw i obowiązków, finansów osobistych, bezpieczeństwa i innych ważnych kwestii (np. kategorycznych zakazów i nakazów czy najważniejszych konkretnych alokacji finansowych i terytorialnych).\n\nTwoja odpowiedź MUSI być w formacie JSON - i zawierać następujące klucze.\nZanim zwrócisz odpowiedź, dokładnie zweryfikuj, czy cała struktura JSON jest w 100% poprawna, włącznie ze wszystkimi przecinkami, nawiasami klamrowymi, kwadratowymi oraz cudzysłowami. Błędny JSON jest nieakceptowalny i uniemożliwi przetworzenie Twojej pracy.\n\nPrzeanalizuj dokładnie poniższy tekst dokumentu prawnego. To jest treść, na podstawie której masz wygenerować podsumowanie i kluczowe punkty:\n--- POCZĄTEK DOKUMENTU ---\n[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.R. 7989 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 7989 To amend the weights used to determine amounts for targeted grants and education finance incentive grants for local educational agencies under title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES March 18, 2026 Mr. Thompson of Pennsylvania (for himself and Mr. Panetta) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To amend the weights used to determine amounts for targeted grants and education finance incentive grants for local educational agencies under title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``All Children are Equal Act'' or the ``ACE Act''. SEC. 2. FINDINGS. Section 1125AA of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6336) is amended-- (1) by amending the heading to read as follows: ``SEC. 1125AA. INCREASE GRANTS PER FORMULA STUDENT AS THE PERCENTAGE OF ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED CHILDREN IN A LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCY INCREASES.''; and (2) by amending subsection (a) to read as follows: ``(a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings: ``(1) The current Basic Grant Formula for the distribution of funds under this part does not adequately target funds for schools with the highest concentrations of economically disadvantaged students. ``(2) The current formulas for distributing Targeted and Education Finance Incentive Grants is intended to allocate more funds per formula student to local educational agencies with higher concentrations of such students. ``(3) These formula use two weighting systems, one based on the percentage of the aged 5-17 population in a local education agency that is eligible to receive funds under this title (percentage weighting), and another based on the absolute number of such students (number weighting). Whichever of these weighting systems results in the highest total weighted formula student count for a local educational agency is the weighting system used for that agency in the final allocation of Targeted and Education Finance Incentive Grant funds. ``(4) Since the amount available to be distributed through these formulas is fixed by congressional appropriation, any gain in allocation share by one local educational agency causes a loss to other local educational agencies. ``(5) The number weighting alternative is often favorable to very large local educational agencies, even if the agency's formula student percentage is low. But because smaller local education agencies simply do not have enough students to gain from number weighting, they are adversely affected under the number weighting alternative. ``(6) The Congressional Research Service has compared the funding allocations of each local education agency for school year 2021-2022 under the current dual weighting system with the funding allocation it would have that year if all local educational agencies had their student count weighted only by percentage weighting. ``(7) This data shows that the use of number weighting in these formulas has shifted funding from smaller to larger local educational agencies notwithstanding the level of poverty in either. This is contrary to the intent of Congress, which is to direct more funding per formula student to local educational agencies with high concentrations of poverty, as measured by the number of formula students as a percentage of the aged 5-17 population of the local educational agency. ``(8) The National Center for Education Statistics confirmed these findings in a statistical analysis report dated May 2019. ``(9) Congress has a responsibility to correct this unintended inequity by reducing the power of the number weighting system relative to the percentage weighting system so that local educational agencies with high percentages of poverty but low numbers of students are not disadvantaged under the formulas used for grants under this part.''. SEC. 3. TARGETED GRANTS TO LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES. Section 1125(c)(2)(A) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6335(c)(2)(A)) is amended to read as follows: ``(A) In general.--For each fiscal year for which the Secretary uses local educational agency data, the weighted child count used to determine a local educational agency's grant under this section-- ``(i) for each fiscal year through fiscal year 2025, is the larger of the two amounts determined under subparagraphs (B) and (C); and ``(ii) for fiscal year 2026 and each succeeding fiscal year, is the amount determined under subparagraph (B).''. SEC. 4. EDUCATION FINANCE INCENTIVE GRANT PROGRAM. (a) States With an Equity Factor Less Than 0.10.--Section 1125A(d)(1)(B)(i) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6337(d)(1)(B)(i)) is amended to read as follows: ``(i) In general.--For each fiscal year for which the Secretary uses local educational agency data, the weighted child count used to determine a local educational agency's grant under this section-- ``(I) for each fiscal year through fiscal year 2025, is the larger of the two amounts determined under clauses (ii) and (iii); and ``(II) for fiscal year 2026 and each succeeding fiscal year, is the amount determined under clause (iii).''. (b) States With an Equity Factor Greater Than or Equal to 0.10 and Less Than 0.20.--Section 1125A(d)(2)(B)(i) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6337(d)(2)(B)(i)) is amended to read as follows: ``(i) In general.--For each fiscal year for which the Secretary uses local educational agency data, the weighted child count used to determine a local educational agency's grant under this section-- ``(I) for each fiscal year through fiscal year 2025, is the larger of the two amounts determined under clauses (ii) and (iii); and ``(II) for fiscal year 2026 and each succeeding fiscal year, is the amount determined under clause (iii).''. (c) States With an Equity Factor Greater Than or Equal to 0.20.-- Section 1125A(d)(3)(B)(i) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6337(d)(3)(B)(i)) is amended to read as follows: ``(i) In general.--For each fiscal year for which the Secretary uses local educational agency data, the weighted child count used to determine a local educational agency's grant under this section-- ``(I) for each fiscal year through fiscal year 2025, is the larger of the two amounts determined under clauses (ii) and (iii); and ``(II) for fiscal year 2026 and each succeeding fiscal year, is the amount determined under clause (iii).''. <all>\n--- KONIEC DOKUMENTU ---\n\nPAMIĘTAJ: Twoja odpowiedź MUSI być wyłącznie poprawnym obiektem JSON. Nie dodawaj żadnych dodatkowych znaków, komentarzy ani tekstu przed znacznikiem '{' ani po znaczniku '}'. Cała odpowiedź musi być parsowalna jako JSON.\nNa podstawie POWYŻSZEGO dokumentu, wypełnij poniższą strukturę JSON:\nOto struktura JSON, której oczekuję (wypełnij ją treścią):\n{\n  \"pl_ai_title\": \"Nowy, krótki tytuł dla aktu prawnego po polsku, oddający sedno wprowadzanych zmian (np. maksymalnie 10-12 słów).\",\n  \"pl_summary\": \"2-3 zdania zwięzłego podsumowania treści aktu prawnego po polsku, napisane z perspektywy wpływu na życie codzienne obywateli.\",\n  \"pl_key_points\": [\n    \"Pierwszy krótki punkt po polsku dotyczący najważniejszych wprowadzanych rozwiązań lub zmian.\",\n    \"Drugi krótki punkt po polsku...\"\n  ],\n  \"eng_ai_title\": \"A new, short title for the legal act in English, capturing the essence of the changes (e.g., max 10-12 words).\",\n  \"eng_summary\": \"2-3 sentences summarizing the legal act in English, from the perspective of its impact on citizens' daily lives.\",\n  \"eng_key_points\": [\n    \"First short bullet point in English regarding the most important solutions or changes being introduced.\",\n    \"Second short bullet point in English...\"\n  ],\n  \"de_ai_title\": \"Ein neuer, kurzer Titel für das Rechtsdokument auf Deutsch, der den Kern der Änderungen erfasst (z.B. max. 10-12 Wörter).\",\n  \"de_summary\": \"2-3 Sätze Zusammenfassung des Rechtsdokuments auf Deutsch, aus der Perspektive seiner Auswirkungen auf das tägliche Leben der Bürger.\",\n  \"de_key_points\": [\n    \"Erster kurzer Stichpunkt auf Deutsch zu den wichtigsten eingeführten Lösungen oder Änderungen.\",\n    \"Zweiter kurzer Stichpunkt auf Deutsch...\"\n  ],\n  \"fr_ai_title\": \"Un nouveau titre court pour l'acte juridique en français, saisissant l'essence des changements (par exemple, 10-12 mots maximum).\",\n  \"fr_summary\": \"Résumé de 2-3 phrases de l'acte juridique en français, du point de vue de son impact sur la vie quotidienne des citoyens.\",\n  \"fr_key_points\": [\n    \"Premier court point en français concernant les solutions ou changements les plus importants introduits.\",\n    \"Deuxième court point en français...\"\n  ],\n  \"es_ai_title\": \"Un nuevo título breve para el acto jurídico en español, que recoja la esencia de los cambios (por ejemplo, máximo 10-12 palabras).\",\n  \"es_summary\": \"Resumen de 2-3 frases del acto jurídico en español, desde la perspectiva de su impacto en la vida cotidiana de los ciudadanos.\",\n  \"es_key_points\": [\n    \"Primer punto breve en español sobre las soluciones o cambios más importantes que se introducen.\",\n    \"Segundo punto breve en español...\"\n  ],\n  \"it_ai_title\": \"Un nuovo titolo breve per l'atto giuridico in italiano, che colga l'essenza delle modifiche (ad es. massimo 10-12 parole).\",\n  \"it_summary\": \"Riepilogo di 2-3 frasi dell'atto giuridico in italiano, dal punto di vista del suo impatto sulla vita quotidiana dei cittadini.\",\n  \"it_key_points\": [\n    \"Primo breve punto in italiano riguardante le soluzioni o le modifiche più importanti introdotte.\",\n    \"Secondo breve punto in italiano...\"\n  ],\n  \"nl_ai_title\": \"Een nieuwe, korte titel voor de rechtshandeling in het Nederlands, die de essentie van de wijzigingen weergeeft (bijv. max. 10-12 woorden).\",\n  \"nl_summary\": \"Samenvatting van 2-3 zinnen van de rechtshandeling in het Nederlands, vanuit het perspectief van de impact op het dagelijks leven van burgers.\",\n  \"nl_key_points\": [\n    \"Eerste korte punt in het Nederlands betreffende de belangrijkste geïntroduceerde oplossingen of wijzigingen.\",\n    \"Tweede korte punt in het Nederlands...\"\n  ],\n  \"pt_ai_title\": \"Um novo título curto para o ato jurídico em português, capturando a essência das mudanças (por exemplo, máx. 10-12 palavras).\",\n  \"pt_summary\": \"Resumo de 2-3 frases do ato jurídico em português, na perspetiva do seu impacto na vida quotidiana dos cidadãos.\",\n  \"pt_key_points\": [\n    \"Primeiro ponto curto em português sobre as soluções ou alterações mais importantes introduzidas.\",\n    \"Segundo ponto curto em português...\"\n  ],\n  \"category\": [\"Categorize the document into one category by default, based on the field it primarily concerns. Choose up to 3 if the document also touches upon SIGNIFICANT issues from other categories. You MUST select categories ONLY from the following list: Health, Education, Family, Taxes, Labor, Security, Environment, Courts and Law, Transport, Benefits, Real Estate, Media and Culture, Local Government, Migration, Agriculture, Public Investments, Informatization, Economy. If the document does not definitively fit any of these, you MUST use \"Other\". If you use \"Other\", it should be the ONLY category selected. Do NOT invent new categories. The response must be an array of strings, e.g., [\"Taxes\", \"Family\"].\"]\n}\n\n",
      "ai_response_raw": "{\n  \"pl_ai_title\": \"Ustawa ACE: Sprawiedliwszy podział funduszy dla szkół w uboższych regionach\",\n  \"pl_summary\": \"Ustawa zmienia sposób przyznawania dotacji federalnych dla szkół, aby więcej pieniędzy trafiało do okręgów z najwyższym odsetkiem uczniów z biednych rodzin. Zmiana ta ma na celu wsparcie mniejszych społeczności, które wcześniej traciły fundusze na rzecz dużych metropolii.\",\n  \"pl_key_points\": [\n    \"Koniec z faworyzowaniem dużych miast tylko ze względu na ogólną liczbę mieszkańców.\",\n    \"Większe fundusze dla szkół w regionach o wysokim procencie ubóstwa.\",\n    \"Nowe zasady obliczania dotacji zaczną obowiązywać od 2026 roku.\",\n    \"Wyrównanie szans edukacyjnych dla dzieci z mniejszych i uboższych okręgów szkolnych.\"\n  ],\n  \"eng_ai_title\": \"ACE Act: Fairer Funding for Schools with High Poverty Rates\",\n  \"eng_summary\": \"This bill changes how federal grants are distributed to schools to ensure more money goes to districts with the highest percentage of low-income students. It aims to fix a system that previously favored large cities over smaller, high-poverty communities.\",\n  \"eng_key_points\": [\n    \"Eliminates 'number weighting' which favored large school districts regardless of their poverty rate.\",\n    \"Bases funding solely on the percentage of students living in poverty within a district.\",\n    \"Ensures smaller districts get a fairer share of federal education funds starting in 2026.\",\n    \"Corrects funding inequities to better support economically disadvantaged students.\"\n  ],\n  \"de_ai_title\": \"ACE-Gesetz: Gerechtere Finanzierung für Schulen mit hoher Armutsquote\",\n  \"de_summary\": \"Dieses Gesetz ändert die Verteilung von Bundesmitteln an Schulen, um sicherzustellen, dass Bezirke mit dem höchsten Prozentsatz an einkommensschwachen Schülern mehr Unterstützung erhalten. Es korrigiert ein System, das bisher große Schulbezirke gegenüber kleineren, ärmeren Gemeinden bevorzugte.\",\n  \"de_key_points\": [\n    \"Abschaffung der Gewichtung nach absoluten Schülerzahlen, die Großstädte bevorzugte.\",\n    \"Fokus auf den tatsächlichen Prozentsatz der Armut im jeweiligen Schulbezirk.\",\n    \"Inkrafttreten der neuen Finanzierungsregeln ab dem Haushaltsjahr 2026.\",\n    \"Gerechtere Verteilung der Bildungsressourcen für benachteiligte Kinder.\"\n  ],\n  \"fr_ai_title\": \"Loi ACE : Un financement plus juste pour les écoles défavorisées\",\n  \"fr_summary\": \"Ce projet de loi modifie la répartition des subventions fédérales aux écoles afin de privilégier les districts ayant le plus fort pourcentage d'élèves issus de familles modestes. L'objectif est de mieux soutenir les petites communes pauvres face aux grandes métropoles.\",\n  \"fr_key_points\": [\n    \"Suppression du calcul basé sur le nombre total d'élèves, qui avantageait les grands districts.\",\n    \"Priorité donnée au taux de pauvreté réel au sein de la communauté scolaire.\",\n    \"Application des nouvelles règles de financement à partir de l'année fiscale 2026.\",\n    \"Rééquilibrage des fonds pour garantir l'égalité des chances entre tous les enfants.\"\n  ],\n  \"es_ai_title\": \"Ley ACE: Financiamiento más justo para escuelas con alta pobreza\",\n  \"es_summary\": \"Esta ley cambia la forma en que se distribuyen las becas federales a las escuelas para asegurar que los distritos con mayor porcentaje de estudiantes de bajos recursos reciban más fondos. Busca corregir la ventaja que tenían los distritos grandes sobre las comunidades pequeñas y pobres.\",\n  \"es_key_points\": [\n    \"Elimina el sistema que favorecía a distritos grandes solo por su tamaño total.\",\n    \"Basa el financiamiento en el porcentaje real de pobreza estudiantil del distrito.\",\n    \"Los cambios en la asignación de fondos comenzarán en el año fiscal 2026.\",\n    \"Busca que todos los niños tengan acceso a recursos educativos equitativos.\"\n  ],\n  \"it_ai_title\": \"Legge ACE: Finanziamenti più equi per le scuole più povere\",\n  \"it_summary\": \"Questa legge modifica la distribuzione dei fondi federali alle scuole per garantire maggiori risorse ai distretti con la più alta percentuale di studenti a basso reddito. Mira a correggere un sistema che favoriva i grandi distretti a scapito delle piccole comunità povere.\",\n  \"it_key_points\": [\n    \"Eliminazione del criterio basato sul numero assoluto di studenti, che favoriva le grandi città.\",\n    \"Finanziamenti basati esclusivamente sulla percentuale di povertà nel distretto scolastico.\",\n    \"Nuove regole di allocazione in vigore dall'anno fiscale 2026.\",\n    \"Maggiore equità nel sostegno agli studenti economicamente svantaggiati.\"\n  ],\n  \"nl_ai_title\": \"ACE-wet: Eerlijkere financiering voor scholen met hoge armoedecijfers\",\n  \"nl_summary\": \"Deze wet wijzigt de verdeling van federale subsidies aan scholen, zodat districten met het hoogste percentage leerlingen uit gezinnen met lage inkomens meer steun krijgen. Het corrigeert een systeem dat voorheen grote districten bevoordeelde boven kleinere, arme gemeenschappen.\",\n  \"nl_key_points\": [\n    \"Afschaffing van de weging op basis van het totale aantal leerlingen, wat grote steden bevoordeelde.\",\n    \"Focus op het werkelijke armoedepercentage binnen een schooldistrict voor de verdeling van geld.\",\n    \"Ingang van de nieuwe financieringsregels vanaf het begrotingsjaar 2026.\",\n    \"Zorgt voor een eerlijkere verdeling van middelen voor kinderen in achterstandssituaties.\"\n  ],\n  \"pt_ai_title\": \"Lei ACE: Financiamento mais justo para escolas com alta pobreza\",\n  \"pt_summary\": \"Esta lei altera a distribuição de subsídios federais para escolas, garantindo que os distritos com a maior percentagem de alunos carenciados recebam mais fundos. O objetivo é corrigir um sistema que favorecia grandes distritos em detrimento de comunidades menores e pobres.\",\n  \"pt_key_points\": [\n    \"Eliminação do critério baseado no número absoluto de alunos, que beneficiava grandes distritos.\",\n    \"Financiamento focado na percentagem real de pobreza da população escolar local.\",\n    \"Mudanças na alocação de verbas válidas a partir do ano fiscal de 2026.\",\n    \"Promoção da igualdade de recursos para crianças em situação de vulnerabilidade económica.\"\n  ],\n  \"category\": [\"Education\"]\n}"
    }
  ]
}