{
  "legislationId": "119_HR_8025",
  "lastUpdate": "2026-04-13T14:27:54.262Z",
  "history": [
    {
      "timestamp": "2026-04-13T14:27:54.262Z",
      "source_url": "https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/hr8025/BILLS-119hr8025ih.htm",
      "model": "gemini-flash-lite-latest",
      "prompt_sent": "\nROLE: Fact Checker.\nZADANIE: Porównaj SOURCE (oryginał) i SUMMARY (streszczenie przygotowane przez inne AI).\n\nTwoim celem jest wykrycie \"ZMYŚLONYCH KONKRETÓW\" (Fabricated Entities) w SUMMARY.\n\nSOURCE:\n[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.R. 8025 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 8025 To provide for an investigation of Canadian digital trade practices, and for other purposes. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES March 19, 2026 Mr. Smucker (for himself, Mr. Steube, Ms. Malliotakis, Mr. Moran, Mr. Kelly of Pennsylvania, and Mrs. Miller of West Virginia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To provide for an investigation of Canadian digital trade practices, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting American Streaming and Innovation Act''. SEC. 2. FINDINGS. Congress finds the following: (1) Digital trade is a critical engine of the United States economy, allowing American companies to deliver innovative audiovisual and audio products and services globally, creating high-paying jobs in the United States and exporting American culture and values. (2) The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), which entered into force on July 1, 2020, includes a robust digital trade chapter intended to prevent discriminatory barriers and ensure a level playing field for North American digital service providers. (3) Canada's law, the Online Streaming Act, empowers Canadian regulators to apply ``contribution'' and ``discoverability'' obligations to audio and audio-visual content, resulting in a revenue-based tax that targets American companies. (4) Canada has chosen to exempt domestic streaming companies from these obligations, while applying strict obligations to U.S.-based companies. The contribution obligations currently require U.S. companies to pay mandatory high-percentage contributions based on models derived from traditional broadcasters and direct these funds exclusively to domestic cultural funds. They also require U.S. audio streaming companies to pay twice because royalties paid by audio services to Canadian rightsholders are included in services' taxable revenue. Discoverability obligations potentially require U.S. companies to undertake costly and technically burdensome platform modifications, including the implementation of invasive data collection and reporting systems, to enforce content prioritization or quotas. These obligations are discriminatory and place a disproportionate burden on United States commerce. (5) These measures appear to contravene Canada's commitments under the USMCA to provide non-discriminatory treatment to United States digital products and services and avoid unnecessary barriers to digital trade, and appear to be unreasonable, discriminatory, and excessively burdensome towards United States commerce. These measures also appear to be a prohibited performance requirement. (6) Canada has invoked the USMCA ``cultural industries'' exception to defend measures like the Online Streaming Act that affect audiovisual and music services. However, the exception traces to the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement era and retains a legacy definition of ``cultural industry'' centered on traditional publishing, recordings, and broadcasting, rather than modern means of digital delivery. (7) If left unchecked, Canada's discriminatory digital policies will set a harmful global precedent, encouraging other nations to adopt similar protectionist digital sovereignty regimes that target successful United States streaming companies and content producers. Trading partners such as Australia, Brazil, Israel, and others have adopted or are considering similar discriminatory digital policies that primarily impact U.S.-based services. Additionally, even within Canada, Quebec is considering an overlapping regime targeting United States companies. (8) It is in the national economic interest of the United States to enforce its rights under trade agreements and statutory authorities and take appropriate action to address foreign practices that are unreasonable, discriminatory, and burden or restrict United States commerce. SEC. 3. INVESTIGATION OF CANADIAN DIGITAL TRADE PRACTICES. (a) In General.--Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the United States Trade Representative shall initiate an investigation under section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2411) to determine whether Canada's implementation of its Online Streaming Act (Bill C-11), including the related regulatory actions of the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC), constitutes an act, policy, or practice that is unreasonable or discriminatory and burdens or restricts United States commerce. (b) Consultations.--In conducting the investigation required by subsection (a), the Trade Representative shall-- (1) consult with affected United States businesses providing online audiovisual or audio streaming services; (2) seek information from relevant trade associations, labor representatives, and cultural organizations; and (3) coordinate with the Department of Commerce, the Department of State, and the United States International Trade Commission. (c) Determinations and Action.-- (1) Affirmative determination.--If the Trade Representative makes an affirmative determination under subsection (a), the Trade Representative shall-- (A) publish such determination in the Federal Register; and (B) consider appropriate action under section 301(c) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2411(c)), which may include the suspension of trade agreement benefits or imposition of duties commensurate with the burden imposed. (2) Negative determination.--If the Trade Representative makes a negative determination under subsection (a) and determines that no action described in paragraph (1)(B) is warranted, the Trade Representative shall transmit to the appropriate congressional committees a report explaining the determination. SEC. 4. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. (a) Initial Report.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the United States Trade Representative shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on-- (1) the implementation of the requirements of section 3; (2) Canada's regulatory implementation schedule for the Online Streaming Act (Bill C-11); and (3) the preliminary findings on the impact of these measures on United States digital service providers. (b) Quarterly Updates.--The Trade Representative shall submit updates to the report required by subsection (a) on a quarterly basis for a period of two years describing-- (1) consultations held with affected stakeholders; (2) any remedial or enforcement actions undertaken; and (3) the state of bilateral engagement with Canada on digital trade issues. (c) Public Summary.--The Trade Representative shall make publicly available a non-confidential summary of each report and update submitted under this section. SEC. 5. RETALIATORY ACTIONS IF CANADA FAILS TO REMEDY DISCRIMINATORY MEASURES. (a) Determination of Non-Compliance.--If, not later than 180 days after publication of an affirmative determination under section 3(c)(1), the United States Trade Representative determines that Canada has not taken satisfactory steps to remove or amend the discriminatory measures identified in the investigation with respect to which the determination was made, the Trade Representative shall take appropriate action under section 301(c) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2411(c)). (b) Forms of Action.--Actions under subsection (a) may include-- (1) the suspension, withdrawal, or modification of trade agreement concessions or benefits to Canada under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement or other agreements; and (2) the imposition of additional duties on goods of Canadian origin in amounts commensurate with the harm from implementation of Canada's Online Streaming Act (Bill C-11). (c) Notice and Consultation.--Before taking any action under this section, the Trade Representative shall-- (1) notify the appropriate congressional committees of the proposed action; and (2) consult with affected stakeholders to ensure that measures are targeted, proportionate, and minimize unintended consequences for United States consumers and allies. (d) Termination of Action.--The Trade Representative may terminate any action under this section if-- (1) Canada eliminates or modifies the measures to the satisfaction of the Trade Representative; and (2) the Trade Representative notifies Congress in writing thereof. SEC. 6. RELATION TO OTHER GLOBAL FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS. To the extent that any other foreign country with which the United States has in effect a free trade agreement takes actions that are similar to the actions of Canada described in section 3(a), the Trade Representative shall apply the provisions of sections 3, 4, and 5 to such other foreign country. SEC. 7. DEFINITIONS. In this Act-- (1) the term ``appropriate congressional committees'' means-- (A) the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives; and (B) the Committee on Finance of the Senate; and (2) the term ``online streaming service'' means any digital service delivering audiovisual or audio programming to users in Canada via the internet. <all>\n\nSUMMARY TO EVALUATE:\nTitle: Protecting American Streaming Services from Discriminatory Canadian Trade Practices\nSummary: This bill requires an investigation into Canadian laws that impose taxes and content requirements on US streaming platforms. If found unfair, the US may retaliate with tariffs on Canadian goods to protect American digital exports and jobs.\nKey Points: Mandates an investigation into Canada's Online Streaming Act within 30 days of enactment., Addresses unfair 'contribution' taxes and content prioritization rules for US-based services., Allows for retaliatory tariffs on Canadian imports if discriminatory measures are not removed., Aims to prevent other countries from adopting similar protectionist digital policies against US companies.\n\nZASADY OCENY:\n1. Sprawdź wszystkie LICZBY, DATY i KWOTY w SUMMARY. Jeśli którejś brakuje w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n2. Sprawdź wszystkie NAZWISKA, ORGANIZACJE i MIEJSCA w SUMMARY. Jeśli którejś brakuje w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n3. Sprawdź wszystkie konkretne DZIAŁANIA PRAWNE . Jeśli tego mechanizmu nie ma w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n\nWAŻNE: Abstrakcyjne pojęcia (np. \"transparentność\", \"zaufanie\") są dozwolone jako wnioski.\n\nOUTPUT (JSON):\n{\n  \"is_valid\": true/false,\n  \"issue\": \"fabricated_entity\" / \"contradiction\" / \"none\"\n}\n\nWYMAGANIA FORMATOWANIA:\n1. Odpowiedz WYŁĄCZNIE surowym obiektem JSON.\n2. NIE używaj bloków kodu Markdown.\n3. NIE dodawaj żadnych wstępów ani wyjaśnień przed ani po JSONie.\n4. JSON musi być poprawny i gotowy do parsowania.\n\n",
      "ai_response_raw": "{\n  \"is_valid\": true,\n  \"issue\": \"none\"\n}"
    },
    {
      "timestamp": "2026-04-13T14:03:28.415Z",
      "source_url": "https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/hr8025/BILLS-119hr8025ih.htm",
      "model": "gemini-flash-latest",
      "prompt_sent": "\nJesteś ekspertem od prawa Stanów Zjednoczonych, który ma za zadanie analizować dokumenty ustaw, uchwał oraz innych dokumentów legislacyjnych, a następnie przygotowywać z nich informacje w przystępny sposób dla obywateli. Twoim celem jest przedstawienie informacji tak, aby obywatele mogli sami ocenić wpływ legislacji na ich życie, nawet bez posiadania specjalistycznej wiedzy legislacyjnej. Skup się na faktach i obiektywnych skutkach wprowadzanych zmian, unikając wartościowania i osobistych opinii. Wszelki żargon prawny jest zabroniony. Prezentuj informacje w jasny, zwięzły i angażujący sposób, tak aby były zrozumiałe dla osoby bez wykształcenia prawniczego. Unikaj długich, złożonych zdań. Zamiast pisać \"projekt ma na celu nowelizację kodeksu podatkowego...\", napisz \"Zmiany w podatkach: nowe ulgi i obowiązki dla...\". Kontynuuj swoją pracę, dopóki nie rozwiążesz swojego zadania. Jeśli nie masz pewności co do generowanej treści, przeanalizuj dokument ponownie – nie zgaduj. Rozplanuj dobrze swoje zadanie przed przystąpieniem do niego. W podsumowaniu i kluczowych punktach, jeśli to możliwe i uzasadnione, podkreśl, jakie konkretne korzyści lub skutki (pozytywne lub negatywne) wprowadza ustawa dla życia codziennego obywateli, ich praw i obowiązków, finansów osobistych, bezpieczeństwa i innych ważnych kwestii (np. kategorycznych zakazów i nakazów czy najważniejszych konkretnych alokacji finansowych i terytorialnych).\n\nTwoja odpowiedź MUSI być w formacie JSON - i zawierać następujące klucze.\nZanim zwrócisz odpowiedź, dokładnie zweryfikuj, czy cała struktura JSON jest w 100% poprawna, włącznie ze wszystkimi przecinkami, nawiasami klamrowymi, kwadratowymi oraz cudzysłowami. Błędny JSON jest nieakceptowalny i uniemożliwi przetworzenie Twojej pracy.\n\nPrzeanalizuj dokładnie poniższy tekst dokumentu prawnego. To jest treść, na podstawie której masz wygenerować podsumowanie i kluczowe punkty:\n--- POCZĄTEK DOKUMENTU ---\n[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.R. 8025 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 8025 To provide for an investigation of Canadian digital trade practices, and for other purposes. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES March 19, 2026 Mr. Smucker (for himself, Mr. Steube, Ms. Malliotakis, Mr. Moran, Mr. Kelly of Pennsylvania, and Mrs. Miller of West Virginia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To provide for an investigation of Canadian digital trade practices, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting American Streaming and Innovation Act''. SEC. 2. FINDINGS. Congress finds the following: (1) Digital trade is a critical engine of the United States economy, allowing American companies to deliver innovative audiovisual and audio products and services globally, creating high-paying jobs in the United States and exporting American culture and values. (2) The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), which entered into force on July 1, 2020, includes a robust digital trade chapter intended to prevent discriminatory barriers and ensure a level playing field for North American digital service providers. (3) Canada's law, the Online Streaming Act, empowers Canadian regulators to apply ``contribution'' and ``discoverability'' obligations to audio and audio-visual content, resulting in a revenue-based tax that targets American companies. (4) Canada has chosen to exempt domestic streaming companies from these obligations, while applying strict obligations to U.S.-based companies. The contribution obligations currently require U.S. companies to pay mandatory high-percentage contributions based on models derived from traditional broadcasters and direct these funds exclusively to domestic cultural funds. They also require U.S. audio streaming companies to pay twice because royalties paid by audio services to Canadian rightsholders are included in services' taxable revenue. Discoverability obligations potentially require U.S. companies to undertake costly and technically burdensome platform modifications, including the implementation of invasive data collection and reporting systems, to enforce content prioritization or quotas. These obligations are discriminatory and place a disproportionate burden on United States commerce. (5) These measures appear to contravene Canada's commitments under the USMCA to provide non-discriminatory treatment to United States digital products and services and avoid unnecessary barriers to digital trade, and appear to be unreasonable, discriminatory, and excessively burdensome towards United States commerce. These measures also appear to be a prohibited performance requirement. (6) Canada has invoked the USMCA ``cultural industries'' exception to defend measures like the Online Streaming Act that affect audiovisual and music services. However, the exception traces to the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement era and retains a legacy definition of ``cultural industry'' centered on traditional publishing, recordings, and broadcasting, rather than modern means of digital delivery. (7) If left unchecked, Canada's discriminatory digital policies will set a harmful global precedent, encouraging other nations to adopt similar protectionist digital sovereignty regimes that target successful United States streaming companies and content producers. Trading partners such as Australia, Brazil, Israel, and others have adopted or are considering similar discriminatory digital policies that primarily impact U.S.-based services. Additionally, even within Canada, Quebec is considering an overlapping regime targeting United States companies. (8) It is in the national economic interest of the United States to enforce its rights under trade agreements and statutory authorities and take appropriate action to address foreign practices that are unreasonable, discriminatory, and burden or restrict United States commerce. SEC. 3. INVESTIGATION OF CANADIAN DIGITAL TRADE PRACTICES. (a) In General.--Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the United States Trade Representative shall initiate an investigation under section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2411) to determine whether Canada's implementation of its Online Streaming Act (Bill C-11), including the related regulatory actions of the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC), constitutes an act, policy, or practice that is unreasonable or discriminatory and burdens or restricts United States commerce. (b) Consultations.--In conducting the investigation required by subsection (a), the Trade Representative shall-- (1) consult with affected United States businesses providing online audiovisual or audio streaming services; (2) seek information from relevant trade associations, labor representatives, and cultural organizations; and (3) coordinate with the Department of Commerce, the Department of State, and the United States International Trade Commission. (c) Determinations and Action.-- (1) Affirmative determination.--If the Trade Representative makes an affirmative determination under subsection (a), the Trade Representative shall-- (A) publish such determination in the Federal Register; and (B) consider appropriate action under section 301(c) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2411(c)), which may include the suspension of trade agreement benefits or imposition of duties commensurate with the burden imposed. (2) Negative determination.--If the Trade Representative makes a negative determination under subsection (a) and determines that no action described in paragraph (1)(B) is warranted, the Trade Representative shall transmit to the appropriate congressional committees a report explaining the determination. SEC. 4. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. (a) Initial Report.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the United States Trade Representative shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on-- (1) the implementation of the requirements of section 3; (2) Canada's regulatory implementation schedule for the Online Streaming Act (Bill C-11); and (3) the preliminary findings on the impact of these measures on United States digital service providers. (b) Quarterly Updates.--The Trade Representative shall submit updates to the report required by subsection (a) on a quarterly basis for a period of two years describing-- (1) consultations held with affected stakeholders; (2) any remedial or enforcement actions undertaken; and (3) the state of bilateral engagement with Canada on digital trade issues. (c) Public Summary.--The Trade Representative shall make publicly available a non-confidential summary of each report and update submitted under this section. SEC. 5. RETALIATORY ACTIONS IF CANADA FAILS TO REMEDY DISCRIMINATORY MEASURES. (a) Determination of Non-Compliance.--If, not later than 180 days after publication of an affirmative determination under section 3(c)(1), the United States Trade Representative determines that Canada has not taken satisfactory steps to remove or amend the discriminatory measures identified in the investigation with respect to which the determination was made, the Trade Representative shall take appropriate action under section 301(c) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2411(c)). (b) Forms of Action.--Actions under subsection (a) may include-- (1) the suspension, withdrawal, or modification of trade agreement concessions or benefits to Canada under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement or other agreements; and (2) the imposition of additional duties on goods of Canadian origin in amounts commensurate with the harm from implementation of Canada's Online Streaming Act (Bill C-11). (c) Notice and Consultation.--Before taking any action under this section, the Trade Representative shall-- (1) notify the appropriate congressional committees of the proposed action; and (2) consult with affected stakeholders to ensure that measures are targeted, proportionate, and minimize unintended consequences for United States consumers and allies. (d) Termination of Action.--The Trade Representative may terminate any action under this section if-- (1) Canada eliminates or modifies the measures to the satisfaction of the Trade Representative; and (2) the Trade Representative notifies Congress in writing thereof. SEC. 6. RELATION TO OTHER GLOBAL FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS. To the extent that any other foreign country with which the United States has in effect a free trade agreement takes actions that are similar to the actions of Canada described in section 3(a), the Trade Representative shall apply the provisions of sections 3, 4, and 5 to such other foreign country. SEC. 7. DEFINITIONS. In this Act-- (1) the term ``appropriate congressional committees'' means-- (A) the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives; and (B) the Committee on Finance of the Senate; and (2) the term ``online streaming service'' means any digital service delivering audiovisual or audio programming to users in Canada via the internet. <all>\n--- KONIEC DOKUMENTU ---\n\nPAMIĘTAJ: Twoja odpowiedź MUSI być wyłącznie poprawnym obiektem JSON. Nie dodawaj żadnych dodatkowych znaków, komentarzy ani tekstu przed znacznikiem '{' ani po znaczniku '}'. Cała odpowiedź musi być parsowalna jako JSON.\nNa podstawie POWYŻSZEGO dokumentu, wypełnij poniższą strukturę JSON:\nOto struktura JSON, której oczekuję (wypełnij ją treścią):\n{\n  \"pl_ai_title\": \"Nowy, krótki tytuł dla aktu prawnego po polsku, oddający sedno wprowadzanych zmian (np. maksymalnie 10-12 słów).\",\n  \"pl_summary\": \"2-3 zdania zwięzłego podsumowania treści aktu prawnego po polsku, napisane z perspektywy wpływu na życie codzienne obywateli.\",\n  \"pl_key_points\": [\n    \"Pierwszy krótki punkt po polsku dotyczący najważniejszych wprowadzanych rozwiązań lub zmian.\",\n    \"Drugi krótki punkt po polsku...\"\n  ],\n  \"eng_ai_title\": \"A new, short title for the legal act in English, capturing the essence of the changes (e.g., max 10-12 words).\",\n  \"eng_summary\": \"2-3 sentences summarizing the legal act in English, from the perspective of its impact on citizens' daily lives.\",\n  \"eng_key_points\": [\n    \"First short bullet point in English regarding the most important solutions or changes being introduced.\",\n    \"Second short bullet point in English...\"\n  ],\n  \"de_ai_title\": \"Ein neuer, kurzer Titel für das Rechtsdokument auf Deutsch, der den Kern der Änderungen erfasst (z.B. max. 10-12 Wörter).\",\n  \"de_summary\": \"2-3 Sätze Zusammenfassung des Rechtsdokuments auf Deutsch, aus der Perspektive seiner Auswirkungen auf das tägliche Leben der Bürger.\",\n  \"de_key_points\": [\n    \"Erster kurzer Stichpunkt auf Deutsch zu den wichtigsten eingeführten Lösungen oder Änderungen.\",\n    \"Zweiter kurzer Stichpunkt auf Deutsch...\"\n  ],\n  \"fr_ai_title\": \"Un nouveau titre court pour l'acte juridique en français, saisissant l'essence des changements (par exemple, 10-12 mots maximum).\",\n  \"fr_summary\": \"Résumé de 2-3 phrases de l'acte juridique en français, du point de vue de son impact sur la vie quotidienne des citoyens.\",\n  \"fr_key_points\": [\n    \"Premier court point en français concernant les solutions ou changements les plus importants introduits.\",\n    \"Deuxième court point en français...\"\n  ],\n  \"es_ai_title\": \"Un nuevo título breve para el acto jurídico en español, que recoja la esencia de los cambios (por ejemplo, máximo 10-12 palabras).\",\n  \"es_summary\": \"Resumen de 2-3 frases del acto jurídico en español, desde la perspectiva de su impacto en la vida cotidiana de los ciudadanos.\",\n  \"es_key_points\": [\n    \"Primer punto breve en español sobre las soluciones o cambios más importantes que se introducen.\",\n    \"Segundo punto breve en español...\"\n  ],\n  \"it_ai_title\": \"Un nuovo titolo breve per l'atto giuridico in italiano, che colga l'essenza delle modifiche (ad es. massimo 10-12 parole).\",\n  \"it_summary\": \"Riepilogo di 2-3 frasi dell'atto giuridico in italiano, dal punto di vista del suo impatto sulla vita quotidiana dei cittadini.\",\n  \"it_key_points\": [\n    \"Primo breve punto in italiano riguardante le soluzioni o le modifiche più importanti introdotte.\",\n    \"Secondo breve punto in italiano...\"\n  ],\n  \"nl_ai_title\": \"Een nieuwe, korte titel voor de rechtshandeling in het Nederlands, die de essentie van de wijzigingen weergeeft (bijv. max. 10-12 woorden).\",\n  \"nl_summary\": \"Samenvatting van 2-3 zinnen van de rechtshandeling in het Nederlands, vanuit het perspectief van de impact op het dagelijks leven van burgers.\",\n  \"nl_key_points\": [\n    \"Eerste korte punt in het Nederlands betreffende de belangrijkste geïntroduceerde oplossingen of wijzigingen.\",\n    \"Tweede korte punt in het Nederlands...\"\n  ],\n  \"pt_ai_title\": \"Um novo título curto para o ato jurídico em português, capturando a essência das mudanças (por exemplo, máx. 10-12 palavras).\",\n  \"pt_summary\": \"Resumo de 2-3 frases do ato jurídico em português, na perspetiva do seu impacto na vida quotidiana dos cidadãos.\",\n  \"pt_key_points\": [\n    \"Primeiro ponto curto em português sobre as soluções ou alterações mais importantes introduzidas.\",\n    \"Segundo ponto curto em português...\"\n  ],\n  \"category\": [\"Categorize the document into one category by default, based on the field it primarily concerns. Choose up to 3 if the document also touches upon SIGNIFICANT issues from other categories. You MUST select categories ONLY from the following list: Health, Education, Family, Taxes, Labor, Security, Environment, Courts and Law, Transport, Benefits, Real Estate, Media and Culture, Local Government, Migration, Agriculture, Public Investments, Informatization, Economy. If the document does not definitively fit any of these, you MUST use \"Other\". If you use \"Other\", it should be the ONLY category selected. Do NOT invent new categories. The response must be an array of strings, e.g., [\"Taxes\", \"Family\"].\"]\n}\n\n",
      "ai_response_raw": "{\n  \"pl_ai_title\": \"Ochrona amerykańskich serwisów streamingowych przed dyskryminacją w Kanadzie\",\n  \"pl_summary\": \"Ustawa nakazuje zbadanie, czy kanadyjskie przepisy dotyczące streamingu niesprawiedliwie obciążają amerykańskie firmy i kulturę. Jeśli dochodzenie wykaże dyskryminację, USA mogą nałożyć cła na kanadyjskie towary, co wpłynie na handel i dostępność usług cyfrowych.\",\n  \"pl_key_points\": [\n    \"Rozpoczęcie w ciągu 30 dni dochodzenia w sprawie kanadyjskich opłat nakładanych na serwisy takie jak Netflix czy Spotify.\",\n    \"Możliwość nałożenia ceł odwetowych na produkty z Kanady, jeśli przepisy nie zostaną zmienione.\",\n    \"Sprzeciw wobec wymogów promowania lokalnych treści kosztem amerykańskich produkcji.\",\n    \"Ochrona amerykańskich miejsc pracy w sektorze cyfrowym i rozrywkowym przed zagranicznym protekcjonizmem.\"\n  ],\n  \"eng_ai_title\": \"Protecting American Streaming Services from Discriminatory Canadian Trade Practices\",\n  \"eng_summary\": \"This bill requires an investigation into Canadian laws that impose taxes and content requirements on US streaming platforms. If found unfair, the US may retaliate with tariffs on Canadian goods to protect American digital exports and jobs.\",\n  \"eng_key_points\": [\n    \"Mandates an investigation into Canada's Online Streaming Act within 30 days of enactment.\",\n    \"Addresses unfair 'contribution' taxes and content prioritization rules for US-based services.\",\n    \"Allows for retaliatory tariffs on Canadian imports if discriminatory measures are not removed.\",\n    \"Aims to prevent other countries from adopting similar protectionist digital policies against US companies.\"\n  ],\n  \"de_ai_title\": \"Schutz amerikanischer Streaming-Dienste vor diskriminierenden Handelspraktiken Kanadas\",\n  \"de_summary\": \"Dieses Gesetz ordnet eine Untersuchung kanadischer Vorschriften an, die US-Streaming-Plattformen mit Steuern und Inhaltsauflagen belasten. Bei Feststellung einer Benachteiligung können die USA Vergeltungszölle auf kanadische Waren erheben.\",\n  \"de_key_points\": [\n    \"Untersuchung des kanadischen Online-Streaming-Gesetzes innerhalb von 30 Tagen nach Inkrafttreten.\",\n    \"Vorgehen gegen einseitige Abgaben und Quoten für US-Anbieter wie Netflix oder Spotify.\",\n    \"Mögliche Einführung von Zöllen auf kanadische Importe als Gegenmaßnahme bei Nicht-Einhaltung.\",\n    \"Schutz amerikanischer Arbeitsplätze und digitaler Exporte vor globalen protektionistischen Trends.\"\n  ],\n  \"fr_ai_title\": \"Protection des services de streaming américains contre les pratiques discriminatoires du Canada\",\n  \"fr_summary\": \"Ce projet de loi impose une enquête sur les lois canadiennes qui taxent et imposent des quotas de contenu aux plateformes de streaming américaines. En cas d'injustice, les États-Unis pourraient taxer les produits canadiens en retour.\",\n  \"fr_key_points\": [\n    \"Lancement d'une enquête sous 30 jours sur la loi canadienne sur la diffusion en ligne.\",\n    \"Contestation des taxes et des obligations de mise en avant de contenus locaux imposées aux services US.\",\n    \"Possibilité de sanctions commerciales et de droits de douane sur les produits canadiens importés.\",\n    \"Défense des emplois et de la culture numérique américaine face aux politiques protectionnistes étrangères.\"\n  ],\n  \"es_ai_title\": \"Protección de los servicios de streaming estadounidenses frente a prácticas discriminatorias en Canadá\",\n  \"es_summary\": \"Esta ley exige investigar si las normas canadienses imponen cargas injustas a las plataformas de streaming de EE. UU. Si se confirma la discriminación, EE. UU. podría imponer aranceles a productos canadienses como represalia.\",\n  \"es_key_points\": [\n    \"Investigación obligatoria de la Ley de Streaming en Línea de Canadá en un plazo de 30 días.\",\n    \"Acción contra impuestos y requisitos de contenido que perjudican desproporcionadamente a empresas de EE. UU.\",\n    \"Posibles aranceles a importaciones canadienses si no se eliminan las barreras comerciales.\",\n    \"Prevención de que otros países adopten políticas digitales proteccionistas similares contra servicios estadounidenses.\"\n  ],\n  \"it_ai_title\": \"Protezione dei servizi di streaming americani dalle pratiche discriminatorie del Canada\",\n  \"it_summary\": \"Questa legge richiede un'indagine sulle norme canadesi che impongono tasse e requisiti di contenuto alle piattaforme di streaming statunitensi. Se ritenute ingiuste, gli USA potrebbero imporre dazi sui prodotti canadesi.\",\n  \"it_key_points\": [\n    \"Avvio di un'indagine entro 30 giorni sulla legge canadese sullo streaming online (Bill C-11).\",\n    \"Contrasto a tasse e obblighi di 'scopribilità' che penalizzano ingiustamente le aziende americane.\",\n    \"Possibili ritorsioni commerciali e dazi sulle merci canadesi se le misure non vengono rimosse.\",\n    \"Tutela dei posti di lavoro e dell'export digitale americano nel mercato globale.\"\n  ],\n  \"nl_ai_title\": \"Bescherming van Amerikaanse streamingdiensten tegen discriminerende Canadese handelspraktijken\",\n  \"nl_summary\": \"Deze wet verplicht een onderzoek naar Canadese regels die Amerikaanse streamingplatforms extra belasten en inhoudsquota opleggen. Bij onredelijkheid kunnen de VS invoerrechten heffen op Canadese goederen.\",\n  \"nl_key_points\": [\n    \"Onderzoek binnen 30 dagen naar de impact van de Canadese Online Streaming Act op de Amerikaanse handel.\",\n    \"Aanpak van oneerlijke belastingen en verplichte promotie van lokale content door Amerikaanse diensten.\",\n    \"Mogelijke vergeldingsmaatregelen zoals extra douanerechten op Canadese producten bij aanhoudende discriminatie.\",\n    \"Behoud van Amerikaanse banen en bescherming tegen wereldwijde protectionistische digitale regimes.\"\n  ],\n  \"pt_ai_title\": \"Proteção dos serviços de streaming americanos contra práticas discriminatórias do Canadá\",\n  \"pt_summary\": \"Esta lei exige uma investigação sobre as normas canadianas que impõem taxas e requisitos de conteúdo às plataformas de streaming dos EUA. Se forem consideradas injustas, os EUA podem aplicar tarifas sobre produtos canadianos.\",\n  \"pt_key_points\": [\n    \"Investigação obrigatória da Lei de Streaming Online do Canadá no prazo de 30 dias após a aprovação.\",\n    \"Combate a impostos e obrigações de visibilidade de conteúdo que prejudicam empresas americanas.\",\n    \"Possíveis sanções comerciais e taxas sobre importações vindas do Canadá como retaliação.\",\n    \"Defesa dos empregos e da cultura digital dos EUA contra políticas protecionistas globais.\"\n  ],\n  \"category\": [\"Media and Culture\", \"Economy\", \"Taxes\"]\n}"
    }
  ]
}