{
  "legislationId": "119_HR_8036",
  "lastUpdate": "2026-04-13T14:29:14.648Z",
  "history": [
    {
      "timestamp": "2026-04-13T14:29:14.648Z",
      "source_url": "https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/hr8036/BILLS-119hr8036ih.htm",
      "model": "gemini-flash-lite-latest",
      "prompt_sent": "\nROLE: Fact Checker.\nZADANIE: Porównaj SOURCE (oryginał) i SUMMARY (streszczenie przygotowane przez inne AI).\n\nTwoim celem jest wykrycie \"ZMYŚLONYCH KONKRETÓW\" (Fabricated Entities) w SUMMARY.\n\nSOURCE:\n[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.R. 8036 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 8036 To amend the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 to permit the Secretary of State, Defense, or Energy to submit proposed rules to the Export Administration Review Board, to require the Secretary of State to evaluate the military civil fusion strategy of the People's Republic of China, and for other purposes. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES March 24, 2026 Mr. Baird introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To amend the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 to permit the Secretary of State, Defense, or Energy to submit proposed rules to the Export Administration Review Board, to require the Secretary of State to evaluate the military civil fusion strategy of the People's Republic of China, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Interagency Coordination in Export Controls Act of 2026''. SEC. 2. INTERAGENCY RULEMAKING PROPOSALS. Section 1754 of the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 (50 U.S.C. 4813) is amended-- (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``consultation'' and inserting ``coordination''; and (2) by adding at the end, the following new subsection: ``(g) Interagency Rulemaking Proposals.-- ``(1) Submission of proposals.--The Secretary of State, Defense, or Energy may submit to the Export Administration Review Board (or its successor) (hereinafter the `Board') a proposal for a new rule, or an amendment to an existing rule, under the Export Administration Regulations. ``(2) Approval of proposals.-- ``(A) In general.--Except as provided under subparagraph (B), not later than days 30 days after a proposal is submitted under paragraph (1), the Board shall vote to accept or reject the proposal. The Secretary shall initiate the rulemaking process for each proposal accepted by a simple majority vote of the Board. ``(B) Exception.--A Board member may extend the deadline described in subparagraph (A) by an additional 30 days if-- ``(i) a Board member requires additional information regarding the proposal with respect to which such extension is sought; and ``(ii) the Board member that issued such proposal agrees to such extension.''. SEC. 3. STATE DEPARTMENT EVALUATION OF CHINA'S MILITARY-CIVIL FUSION STRATEGY. (a) In General.--Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall, in consultation with each agency that is represented by a member of the Operating Committee for Export Policy, complete a review of the implications of the military- civil fusion strategy of the People's Republic of China (in this Act referred to as the ``PRC'') for the export control policy of the United States and for the national security of the United States, including a review of the following topics: (1) The exploitation of United States and allied technology and talent by the PRC to modernize the PRC's military. (2) Whether any entity in the PRC can be considered, in the context of United States national security and export control policy, a purely civilian entity. (3) The reliability of end-use checks and end-use conditions for exports, reexports, and in-country transfers to entities that are located or headquartered in, or the ultimate parent company of which is headquartered in, the PRC. (4) The relationship between the PRC's strategic technology sectors (such as artificial intelligence, semiconductor, quantum, robotics, biotechnology) and the PRC's military. (5) Whether the addition of any entity to the Military End- User List would address to any extent the national security risks posed by the military-civil fusion strategy of the PRC. (6) Due diligence required by exporters to prevent the PRC's military from accessing United States technology. (7) Whether any change to United States export control policy would address to any extent the national security risks posed by the military-civil fusion strategy of the PRC. (8) Any other topic the Secretary determines is relevant for this review. (b) Proposed Changes to Policy.-- (1) In general.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall consider proposing to the Export Administration Review Board (or any successor entity) any change to United States export control policy identified pursuant to the review required by subsection (a), which may include-- (A) additions to the Military End-User List; (B) changes to export control restrictions on certain military end uses; (C) new rules or amendments to the Export Administration Regulations; (D) a final rule pursuant to the proposed rule published in the Federal Register entitled ``End-Use and End-User Based Export Controls, Including U.S. Persons Activities Controls: Military and Intelligence End Uses and End Users'' (89 Fed. Reg. 60985 (July 29, 2024)); and (E) any other policy the Secretary determines would address the national security risks posed by the military-civil fusion strategy of the PRC. (2) Interagency vote.--The Board shall vote on the adoption of each change proposed pursuant to paragraph (1) in the manner described in subsection (g)(2) of section 1754 of the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 (50 U.S.C. 4813), as added by section 2. (c) Report to Congress.--Not later than 150 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that includes the following: (1) The review required by subsection (a). (2) Any proposed rule required by subsection (b). (3) Any change in United States policy approved by the Export Administration Review Board. (4) Any recommended change to United States law that would help address the national security risks posed by the military- civil fusion strategy of the PRC. SEC. 4. DEFINITIONS. In this Act: (1) Appropriate congressional committees.--The term ``appropriate congressional committees'' means-- (A) the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives; and (B) the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate. (2) Military end-user list.--The term ``Military End-User List'' means the list maintained by the Bureau of Industry and Security of the Department of Commerce and set forth in Supplement No. 7 to part 744 of title 15, Code of Federal Regulations, or successor regulations. (3) Operating committee for export policy.--The term ``Operating Committee for Export Policy'' means the Operating Committee for Export Policy referred to in section 1763(c) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (50 U.S.C. 4822(c)). (4) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of State. <all>\n\nSUMMARY TO EVALUATE:\nTitle: Interagency Coordination in Export Controls Act of 2026\nSummary: This bill strengthens the protection of American technology by preventing it from being used to modernize the Chinese military. It establishes closer cooperation between the Departments of Defense, Energy, and State to better regulate international technology sales.\nKey Points: The Departments of Defense and Energy can now propose new restrictions on technology exports., Mandatory review of whether Chinese companies labeled as civilian are actually supporting their military., Increased oversight of exports in strategic sectors like AI, semiconductors, and robotics., Stricter verification processes to ensure American technology in China does not reach unintended military users.\n\nZASADY OCENY:\n1. Sprawdź wszystkie LICZBY, DATY i KWOTY w SUMMARY. Jeśli którejś brakuje w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n2. Sprawdź wszystkie NAZWISKA, ORGANIZACJE i MIEJSCA w SUMMARY. Jeśli którejś brakuje w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n3. Sprawdź wszystkie konkretne DZIAŁANIA PRAWNE . Jeśli tego mechanizmu nie ma w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n\nWAŻNE: Abstrakcyjne pojęcia (np. \"transparentność\", \"zaufanie\") są dozwolone jako wnioski.\n\nOUTPUT (JSON):\n{\n  \"is_valid\": true/false,\n  \"issue\": \"fabricated_entity\" / \"contradiction\" / \"none\"\n}\n\nWYMAGANIA FORMATOWANIA:\n1. Odpowiedz WYŁĄCZNIE surowym obiektem JSON.\n2. NIE używaj bloków kodu Markdown.\n3. NIE dodawaj żadnych wstępów ani wyjaśnień przed ani po JSONie.\n4. JSON musi być poprawny i gotowy do parsowania.\n\n",
      "ai_response_raw": "{\n  \"is_valid\": true,\n  \"issue\": \"none\"\n}"
    },
    {
      "timestamp": "2026-04-13T14:04:47.958Z",
      "source_url": "https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/hr8036/BILLS-119hr8036ih.htm",
      "model": "gemini-flash-latest",
      "prompt_sent": "\nJesteś ekspertem od prawa Stanów Zjednoczonych, który ma za zadanie analizować dokumenty ustaw, uchwał oraz innych dokumentów legislacyjnych, a następnie przygotowywać z nich informacje w przystępny sposób dla obywateli. Twoim celem jest przedstawienie informacji tak, aby obywatele mogli sami ocenić wpływ legislacji na ich życie, nawet bez posiadania specjalistycznej wiedzy legislacyjnej. Skup się na faktach i obiektywnych skutkach wprowadzanych zmian, unikając wartościowania i osobistych opinii. Wszelki żargon prawny jest zabroniony. Prezentuj informacje w jasny, zwięzły i angażujący sposób, tak aby były zrozumiałe dla osoby bez wykształcenia prawniczego. Unikaj długich, złożonych zdań. Zamiast pisać \"projekt ma na celu nowelizację kodeksu podatkowego...\", napisz \"Zmiany w podatkach: nowe ulgi i obowiązki dla...\". Kontynuuj swoją pracę, dopóki nie rozwiążesz swojego zadania. Jeśli nie masz pewności co do generowanej treści, przeanalizuj dokument ponownie – nie zgaduj. Rozplanuj dobrze swoje zadanie przed przystąpieniem do niego. W podsumowaniu i kluczowych punktach, jeśli to możliwe i uzasadnione, podkreśl, jakie konkretne korzyści lub skutki (pozytywne lub negatywne) wprowadza ustawa dla życia codziennego obywateli, ich praw i obowiązków, finansów osobistych, bezpieczeństwa i innych ważnych kwestii (np. kategorycznych zakazów i nakazów czy najważniejszych konkretnych alokacji finansowych i terytorialnych).\n\nTwoja odpowiedź MUSI być w formacie JSON - i zawierać następujące klucze.\nZanim zwrócisz odpowiedź, dokładnie zweryfikuj, czy cała struktura JSON jest w 100% poprawna, włącznie ze wszystkimi przecinkami, nawiasami klamrowymi, kwadratowymi oraz cudzysłowami. Błędny JSON jest nieakceptowalny i uniemożliwi przetworzenie Twojej pracy.\n\nPrzeanalizuj dokładnie poniższy tekst dokumentu prawnego. To jest treść, na podstawie której masz wygenerować podsumowanie i kluczowe punkty:\n--- POCZĄTEK DOKUMENTU ---\n[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.R. 8036 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 8036 To amend the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 to permit the Secretary of State, Defense, or Energy to submit proposed rules to the Export Administration Review Board, to require the Secretary of State to evaluate the military civil fusion strategy of the People's Republic of China, and for other purposes. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES March 24, 2026 Mr. Baird introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To amend the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 to permit the Secretary of State, Defense, or Energy to submit proposed rules to the Export Administration Review Board, to require the Secretary of State to evaluate the military civil fusion strategy of the People's Republic of China, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Interagency Coordination in Export Controls Act of 2026''. SEC. 2. INTERAGENCY RULEMAKING PROPOSALS. Section 1754 of the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 (50 U.S.C. 4813) is amended-- (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``consultation'' and inserting ``coordination''; and (2) by adding at the end, the following new subsection: ``(g) Interagency Rulemaking Proposals.-- ``(1) Submission of proposals.--The Secretary of State, Defense, or Energy may submit to the Export Administration Review Board (or its successor) (hereinafter the `Board') a proposal for a new rule, or an amendment to an existing rule, under the Export Administration Regulations. ``(2) Approval of proposals.-- ``(A) In general.--Except as provided under subparagraph (B), not later than days 30 days after a proposal is submitted under paragraph (1), the Board shall vote to accept or reject the proposal. The Secretary shall initiate the rulemaking process for each proposal accepted by a simple majority vote of the Board. ``(B) Exception.--A Board member may extend the deadline described in subparagraph (A) by an additional 30 days if-- ``(i) a Board member requires additional information regarding the proposal with respect to which such extension is sought; and ``(ii) the Board member that issued such proposal agrees to such extension.''. SEC. 3. STATE DEPARTMENT EVALUATION OF CHINA'S MILITARY-CIVIL FUSION STRATEGY. (a) In General.--Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall, in consultation with each agency that is represented by a member of the Operating Committee for Export Policy, complete a review of the implications of the military- civil fusion strategy of the People's Republic of China (in this Act referred to as the ``PRC'') for the export control policy of the United States and for the national security of the United States, including a review of the following topics: (1) The exploitation of United States and allied technology and talent by the PRC to modernize the PRC's military. (2) Whether any entity in the PRC can be considered, in the context of United States national security and export control policy, a purely civilian entity. (3) The reliability of end-use checks and end-use conditions for exports, reexports, and in-country transfers to entities that are located or headquartered in, or the ultimate parent company of which is headquartered in, the PRC. (4) The relationship between the PRC's strategic technology sectors (such as artificial intelligence, semiconductor, quantum, robotics, biotechnology) and the PRC's military. (5) Whether the addition of any entity to the Military End- User List would address to any extent the national security risks posed by the military-civil fusion strategy of the PRC. (6) Due diligence required by exporters to prevent the PRC's military from accessing United States technology. (7) Whether any change to United States export control policy would address to any extent the national security risks posed by the military-civil fusion strategy of the PRC. (8) Any other topic the Secretary determines is relevant for this review. (b) Proposed Changes to Policy.-- (1) In general.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall consider proposing to the Export Administration Review Board (or any successor entity) any change to United States export control policy identified pursuant to the review required by subsection (a), which may include-- (A) additions to the Military End-User List; (B) changes to export control restrictions on certain military end uses; (C) new rules or amendments to the Export Administration Regulations; (D) a final rule pursuant to the proposed rule published in the Federal Register entitled ``End-Use and End-User Based Export Controls, Including U.S. Persons Activities Controls: Military and Intelligence End Uses and End Users'' (89 Fed. Reg. 60985 (July 29, 2024)); and (E) any other policy the Secretary determines would address the national security risks posed by the military-civil fusion strategy of the PRC. (2) Interagency vote.--The Board shall vote on the adoption of each change proposed pursuant to paragraph (1) in the manner described in subsection (g)(2) of section 1754 of the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 (50 U.S.C. 4813), as added by section 2. (c) Report to Congress.--Not later than 150 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that includes the following: (1) The review required by subsection (a). (2) Any proposed rule required by subsection (b). (3) Any change in United States policy approved by the Export Administration Review Board. (4) Any recommended change to United States law that would help address the national security risks posed by the military- civil fusion strategy of the PRC. SEC. 4. DEFINITIONS. In this Act: (1) Appropriate congressional committees.--The term ``appropriate congressional committees'' means-- (A) the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives; and (B) the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate. (2) Military end-user list.--The term ``Military End-User List'' means the list maintained by the Bureau of Industry and Security of the Department of Commerce and set forth in Supplement No. 7 to part 744 of title 15, Code of Federal Regulations, or successor regulations. (3) Operating committee for export policy.--The term ``Operating Committee for Export Policy'' means the Operating Committee for Export Policy referred to in section 1763(c) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (50 U.S.C. 4822(c)). (4) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of State. <all>\n--- KONIEC DOKUMENTU ---\n\nPAMIĘTAJ: Twoja odpowiedź MUSI być wyłącznie poprawnym obiektem JSON. Nie dodawaj żadnych dodatkowych znaków, komentarzy ani tekstu przed znacznikiem '{' ani po znaczniku '}'. Cała odpowiedź musi być parsowalna jako JSON.\nNa podstawie POWYŻSZEGO dokumentu, wypełnij poniższą strukturę JSON:\nOto struktura JSON, której oczekuję (wypełnij ją treścią):\n{\n  \"pl_ai_title\": \"Nowy, krótki tytuł dla aktu prawnego po polsku, oddający sedno wprowadzanych zmian (np. maksymalnie 10-12 słów).\",\n  \"pl_summary\": \"2-3 zdania zwięzłego podsumowania treści aktu prawnego po polsku, napisane z perspektywy wpływu na życie codzienne obywateli.\",\n  \"pl_key_points\": [\n    \"Pierwszy krótki punkt po polsku dotyczący najważniejszych wprowadzanych rozwiązań lub zmian.\",\n    \"Drugi krótki punkt po polsku...\"\n  ],\n  \"eng_ai_title\": \"A new, short title for the legal act in English, capturing the essence of the changes (e.g., max 10-12 words).\",\n  \"eng_summary\": \"2-3 sentences summarizing the legal act in English, from the perspective of its impact on citizens' daily lives.\",\n  \"eng_key_points\": [\n    \"First short bullet point in English regarding the most important solutions or changes being introduced.\",\n    \"Second short bullet point in English...\"\n  ],\n  \"de_ai_title\": \"Ein neuer, kurzer Titel für das Rechtsdokument auf Deutsch, der den Kern der Änderungen erfasst (z.B. max. 10-12 Wörter).\",\n  \"de_summary\": \"2-3 Sätze Zusammenfassung des Rechtsdokuments auf Deutsch, aus der Perspektive seiner Auswirkungen auf das tägliche Leben der Bürger.\",\n  \"de_key_points\": [\n    \"Erster kurzer Stichpunkt auf Deutsch zu den wichtigsten eingeführten Lösungen oder Änderungen.\",\n    \"Zweiter kurzer Stichpunkt auf Deutsch...\"\n  ],\n  \"fr_ai_title\": \"Un nouveau titre court pour l'acte juridique en français, saisissant l'essence des changements (par exemple, 10-12 mots maximum).\",\n  \"fr_summary\": \"Résumé de 2-3 phrases de l'acte juridique en français, du point de vue de son impact sur la vie quotidienne des citoyens.\",\n  \"fr_key_points\": [\n    \"Premier court point en français concernant les solutions ou changements les plus importants introduits.\",\n    \"Deuxième court point en français...\"\n  ],\n  \"es_ai_title\": \"Un nuevo título breve para el acto jurídico en español, que recoja la esencia de los cambios (por ejemplo, máximo 10-12 palabras).\",\n  \"es_summary\": \"Resumen de 2-3 frases del acto jurídico en español, desde la perspectiva de su impacto en la vida cotidiana de los ciudadanos.\",\n  \"es_key_points\": [\n    \"Primer punto breve en español sobre las soluciones o cambios más importantes que se introducen.\",\n    \"Segundo punto breve en español...\"\n  ],\n  \"it_ai_title\": \"Un nuovo titolo breve per l'atto giuridico in italiano, che colga l'essenza delle modifiche (ad es. massimo 10-12 parole).\",\n  \"it_summary\": \"Riepilogo di 2-3 frasi dell'atto giuridico in italiano, dal punto di vista del suo impatto sulla vita quotidiana dei cittadini.\",\n  \"it_key_points\": [\n    \"Primo breve punto in italiano riguardante le soluzioni o le modifiche più importanti introdotte.\",\n    \"Secondo breve punto in italiano...\"\n  ],\n  \"nl_ai_title\": \"Een nieuwe, korte titel voor de rechtshandeling in het Nederlands, die de essentie van de wijzigingen weergeeft (bijv. max. 10-12 woorden).\",\n  \"nl_summary\": \"Samenvatting van 2-3 zinnen van de rechtshandeling in het Nederlands, vanuit het perspectief van de impact op het dagelijks leven van burgers.\",\n  \"nl_key_points\": [\n    \"Eerste korte punt in het Nederlands betreffende de belangrijkste geïntroduceerde oplossingen of wijzigingen.\",\n    \"Tweede korte punt in het Nederlands...\"\n  ],\n  \"pt_ai_title\": \"Um novo título curto para o ato jurídico em português, capturando a essência das mudanças (por exemplo, máx. 10-12 palavras).\",\n  \"pt_summary\": \"Resumo de 2-3 frases do ato jurídico em português, na perspetiva do seu impacto na vida quotidiana dos cidadãos.\",\n  \"pt_key_points\": [\n    \"Primeiro ponto curto em português sobre as soluções ou alterações mais importantes introduzidas.\",\n    \"Segundo ponto curto em português...\"\n  ],\n  \"category\": [\"Categorize the document into one category by default, based on the field it primarily concerns. Choose up to 3 if the document also touches upon SIGNIFICANT issues from other categories. You MUST select categories ONLY from the following list: Health, Education, Family, Taxes, Labor, Security, Environment, Courts and Law, Transport, Benefits, Real Estate, Media and Culture, Local Government, Migration, Agriculture, Public Investments, Informatization, Economy. If the document does not definitively fit any of these, you MUST use \"Other\". If you use \"Other\", it should be the ONLY category selected. Do NOT invent new categories. The response must be an array of strings, e.g., [\"Taxes\", \"Family\"].\"]\n}\n\n",
      "ai_response_raw": "{\n  \"pl_ai_title\": \"Ustawa o koordynacji kontroli eksportu technologii do Chin z 2026 roku\",\n  \"pl_summary\": \"Ustawa ma na celu wzmocnienie ochrony amerykańskich technologii przed ich wykorzystaniem przez chińskie wojsko. Wprowadza ona ściślejszą współpracę między resortami obrony, energii i stanu, aby lepiej kontrolować sprzedaż nowoczesnych rozwiązań za granicę.\",\n  \"pl_key_points\": [\n    \"Resorty Obrony i Energii zyskują prawo do proponowania nowych ograniczeń w eksporcie technologii.\",\n    \"Obowiązkowa ocena, czy chińskie firmy uznawane za cywilne w rzeczywistości wspierają tamtejszą armię.\",\n    \"Zwiększony nadzór nad eksportem w kluczowych sektorach, takich jak sztuczna inteligencja, półprzewodniki i robotyka.\",\n    \"Wprowadzenie surowszych kontroli sprawdzających, do kogo ostatecznie trafia amerykańska technologia w Chinach.\"\n  ],\n  \"eng_ai_title\": \"Interagency Coordination in Export Controls Act of 2026\",\n  \"eng_summary\": \"This bill strengthens the protection of American technology by preventing it from being used to modernize the Chinese military. It establishes closer cooperation between the Departments of Defense, Energy, and State to better regulate international technology sales.\",\n  \"eng_key_points\": [\n    \"The Departments of Defense and Energy can now propose new restrictions on technology exports.\",\n    \"Mandatory review of whether Chinese companies labeled as civilian are actually supporting their military.\",\n    \"Increased oversight of exports in strategic sectors like AI, semiconductors, and robotics.\",\n    \"Stricter verification processes to ensure American technology in China does not reach unintended military users.\"\n  ],\n  \"de_ai_title\": \"Gesetz zur Koordinierung von Exportkontrollen für Technologien von 2026\",\n  \"de_summary\": \"Dieses Gesetz soll amerikanische Technologien davor schützen, vom chinesischen Militär genutzt zu werden. Es führt eine engere Zusammenarbeit zwischen den Verteidigungs-, Energie- und Außenministerien ein, um den Verkauf moderner Lösungen ins Ausland besser zu kontrollieren.\",\n  \"de_key_points\": [\n    \"Die Ministerien für Verteidigung und Energie erhalten das Recht, neue Exportbeschränkungen für Technologien vorzuschlagen.\",\n    \"Verpflichtende Prüfung, ob chinesische Unternehmen, die als zivil gelten, in Wirklichkeit das dortige Militär unterstützen.\",\n    \"Verstärkte Aufsicht über Exporte in Schlüsselsektoren wie KI, Halbleiter und Robotik.\",\n    \"Einführung strengerer Kontrollen, um zu prüfen, wer in China letztendlich die US-Technologie erhält.\"\n  ],\n  \"fr_ai_title\": \"Loi de 2026 sur la coordination interministérielle des contrôles à l'exportation\",\n  \"fr_summary\": \"Cette loi vise à renforcer la protection des technologies américaines contre leur utilisation par l'armée chinoise. Elle instaure une coopération plus étroite entre les ministères de la Défense, de l'Énergie et de l'État pour mieux contrôler les ventes de solutions avancées à l'étranger.\",\n  \"fr_key_points\": [\n    \"Les ministères de la Défense et de l'Énergie peuvent désormais proposer de nouvelles restrictions sur les exportations technologiques.\",\n    \"Évaluation obligatoire pour déterminer si des entreprises chinoises considérées comme civiles soutiennent en réalité leur armée.\",\n    \"Surveillance accrue des exportations dans des secteurs clés tels que l'intelligence artificielle, les semi-conducteurs et la robotique.\",\n    \"Mise en place de contrôles plus stricts pour vérifier qui utilise réellement la technologie américaine en Chine.\"\n  ],\n  \"es_ai_title\": \"Ley de Coordinación Interagencial en Controles de Exportación de 2026\",\n  \"es_summary\": \"Esta ley busca reforzar la protección de las tecnologías estadounidenses para evitar que sean utilizadas por el ejército chino. Introduce una colaboración más estrecha entre los departamentos de Defensa, Energía y Estado para controlar mejor las ventas de tecnología avanzada al exterior.\",\n  \"es_key_points\": [\n    \"Los departamentos de Defensa y Energía podrán proponer nuevas restricciones a la exportación de tecnología.\",\n    \"Evaluación obligatoria para verificar si empresas chinas supuestamente civiles están apoyando a su ejército.\",\n    \"Mayor vigilancia sobre las exportaciones en sectores estratégicos como inteligencia artificial, semiconductores y robótica.\",\n    \"Controles más rigurosos para asegurar el destino final de la tecnología estadounidense en China.\"\n  ],\n  \"it_ai_title\": \"Legge sul coordinamento interagenzie per i controlli alle esportazioni del 2026\",\n  \"it_summary\": \"Questa legge mira a rafforzare la protezione delle tecnologie americane per impedire che vengano utilizzate dall'esercito cinese. Introduce una cooperazione più stretta tra i dipartimenti della Difesa, dell'Energia e dello Stato per controllare meglio le vendite di soluzioni avanzate all'estero.\",\n  \"it_key_points\": [\n    \"I dipartimenti della Difesa e dell'Energia possono proporre nuove restrizioni alle esportazioni tecnologiche.\",\n    \"Valutazione obbligatoria per verificare se le aziende cinesi considerate civili sostengano in realtà il loro esercito.\",\n    \"Maggiore sorveglianza sulle esportazioni in settori chiave come intelligenza artificiale, semiconduttori e robotica.\",\n    \"Controlli più severi per verificare chi riceve effettivamente la tecnologia statunitense in Cina.\"\n  ],\n  \"nl_ai_title\": \"Wet op interdepartementale coördinatie van exportcontroles van 2026\",\n  \"nl_summary\": \"Deze wet is bedoeld om Amerikaanse technologieën beter te beschermen tegen gebruik door het Chinese leger. Het voert nauwere samenwerking in tussen de ministeries van Defensie, Energie en Buitenlandse Zaken om de verkoop van geavanceerde oplossingen aan het buitenland te beheersen.\",\n  \"nl_key_points\": [\n    \"De ministeries van Defensie en Energie krijgen het recht om nieuwe beperkingen op de export van technologie voor te stellen.\",\n    \"Verplichte beoordeling of Chinese bedrijven die als civiel worden beschouwd, in werkelijkheid hun leger ondersteunen.\",\n    \"Verhoogd toezicht op de export in cruciale sectoren zoals kunstmatige intelligentie, halfgeleiders en robotica.\",\n    \"Invoering van strengere controles om te verifiëren wie in China uiteindelijk de Amerikaanse technologie ontvangt.\"\n  ],\n  \"pt_ai_title\": \"Lei de Coordenação Interagências em Controles de Exportação de 2026\",\n  \"pt_summary\": \"Esta lei visa reforçar a proteção das tecnologias americanas contra a sua utilização pelo exército chinês. Introduz uma cooperação mais estreita entre os departamentos da Defesa, Energia e Estado para controlar melhor as vendas de soluções avançadas para o estrangeiro.\",\n  \"pt_key_points\": [\n    \"Os departamentos da Defesa e da Energia passam a poder propor novas restrições à exportação de tecnologia.\",\n    \"Avaliação obrigatória para verificar se empresas chinesas consideradas civis estão, na realidade, a apoiar o seu exército.\",\n    \"Vigilância reforçada sobre as exportações em setores estratégicos como inteligência artificial, semicondutores e robótica.\",\n    \"Implementação de controlos mais rigorosos para verificar quem é o utilizador final da tecnologia americana na China.\"\n  ],\n  \"category\": [\"Security\", \"Economy\", \"Informatization\"]\n}"
    }
  ]
}