{
  "legislationId": "119_HR_8178",
  "lastUpdate": "2026-04-15T11:36:54.748Z",
  "history": [
    {
      "timestamp": "2026-04-15T11:36:54.748Z",
      "source_url": "https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/hr8178/BILLS-119hr8178ih.htm",
      "model": "gemini-flash-lite-latest",
      "prompt_sent": "\nROLE: Fact Checker.\nZADANIE: Porównaj SOURCE (oryginał) i SUMMARY (streszczenie przygotowane przez inne AI).\n\nTwoim celem jest wykrycie \"ZMYŚLONYCH KONKRETÓW\" (Fabricated Entities) w SUMMARY.\n\nSOURCE:\n[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.R. 8178 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 8178 To protect Americans from unauthorized surveillance. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 2, 2026 Mr. Lieu introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To protect Americans from unauthorized surveillance. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Americans from Unauthorized Surveillance Act''. SEC. 2. FISA OVERSIGHT OFFICE. (a) In General.--Title I of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 is amended by adding at the end the following: ``SEC. 113. FISA OVERSIGHT OFFICE. ``(a) In General.--There is established an office, to be known as the `FISA Oversight Office', within the Department of Justice (hereinafter in this section referred to as the `Office'). The Office-- ``(1) shall evaluate each application under this title; ``(2) except as provided in paragraph (3), if the Office determines based on the evaluation under paragraph (1) that the probable cause standard under section 105(a)(2) may not be met, may-- ``(A) petition to be joined as a party; and ``(B) file a motion with the court alleging that such standard has not been met; and ``(3) if the application is for the surveillance of a United States person and if the Office determines based on the evaluation under paragraph (1) that the probable cause standard under section 105(a)(2) has not been clearly met, shall-- ``(A) petition to be joined as a party; and ``(B) file a motion with the court alleging that such standard has not been met. ``(b) Access to Information.--The Federal office filing the application shall provide the Office all available evidence that pertains to an investigation into a United States person. That officer is required to notify the Office each time an application is filed with the court established under section 103(a). ``(c) Report Required.--Not later than 365 days after the effective date of this section, the Attorney General and the Director shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report detailing-- ``(1) the number of applications for which the FISA Oversight Office has filed a motion under subsection (a)(2)(B) or (a)(3)(B) and information regarding the subject of such applications and the information sought to be collected; ``(2) the number of such applications that the FISA Oversight Office has declined to challenge, and information regarding the subject of such applications and the information sought to be collected, as well as information regarding the Office's decision not to challenge.''. (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents for such Act is amended by inserting after the item pertaining to section 112 the following: ``Sec. 113. FISA Oversight Office.''. SEC. 3. REQUIREMENT FOR FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURT TO APPOINT AMICUS CURIAE. Section 103(i) of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1803(i)) is amended-- (1) by amending paragraph (2) to read as follows: ``(2) Requirement.--A court established under subsection (a) or (b), consistent with the requirement of subsection (c) and any other statutory requirement that the court act expeditiously or within a stated time, shall appoint an individual who has been designated under paragraph (1) to serve as amicus curiae to assist such court in the consideration of each application for an order or review under this title.''; (2) in paragraph (4), by striking ``If a court established under subsection (a) or (b) appoints an amicus curiae under paragraph (2)(A)'' and inserting ``An amicus curiae appointed under paragraph (2)(A)''; (3) in paragraph (6)(A), by striking ``If a court established under subsection (a) or (b) appoints an amicus curiae under paragraph (2), the amicus curiae'' and inserting ``An amicus curiae appointed under paragraph (2)(A)''; and (4) by repealing paragraph (7). <all>\n\nSUMMARY TO EVALUATE:\nTitle: Protecting Americans from Unauthorized Surveillance Act: New Oversight for Intelligence Requests\nSummary: This bill creates a new oversight office to review government surveillance requests and ensure they meet legal standards. It strengthens privacy protections by requiring independent experts to participate in court proceedings regarding wiretapping and data collection.\nKey Points: Establishment of the FISA Oversight Office within the Department of Justice to evaluate surveillance applications., Mandatory legal challenges by the Office if surveillance requests for U.S. persons lack clear probable cause., Requirement for the court to appoint an independent expert (amicus curiae) for every surveillance application or review., Increased transparency through annual reports to Congress on challenged and approved surveillance requests.\n\nZASADY OCENY:\n1. Sprawdź wszystkie LICZBY, DATY i KWOTY w SUMMARY. Jeśli którejś brakuje w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n2. Sprawdź wszystkie NAZWISKA, ORGANIZACJE i MIEJSCA w SUMMARY. Jeśli którejś brakuje w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n3. Sprawdź wszystkie konkretne DZIAŁANIA PRAWNE . Jeśli tego mechanizmu nie ma w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n\nWAŻNE: Abstrakcyjne pojęcia (np. \"transparentność\", \"zaufanie\") są dozwolone jako wnioski.\n\nOUTPUT (JSON):\n{\n  \"is_valid\": true/false,\n  \"issue\": \"fabricated_entity\" / \"contradiction\" / \"none\"\n}\n\nWYMAGANIA FORMATOWANIA:\n1. Odpowiedz WYŁĄCZNIE surowym obiektem JSON.\n2. NIE używaj bloków kodu Markdown.\n3. NIE dodawaj żadnych wstępów ani wyjaśnień przed ani po JSONie.\n4. JSON musi być poprawny i gotowy do parsowania.\n\n",
      "ai_response_raw": "{\n  \"is_valid\": true,\n  \"issue\": \"none\"\n}"
    },
    {
      "timestamp": "2026-04-15T11:20:09.385Z",
      "source_url": "https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/hr8178/BILLS-119hr8178ih.htm",
      "model": "gemini-flash-latest",
      "prompt_sent": "\nJesteś ekspertem od prawa Stanów Zjednoczonych, który ma za zadanie analizować dokumenty ustaw, uchwał oraz innych dokumentów legislacyjnych, a następnie przygotowywać z nich informacje w przystępny sposób dla obywateli. Twoim celem jest przedstawienie informacji tak, aby obywatele mogli sami ocenić wpływ legislacji na ich życie, nawet bez posiadania specjalistycznej wiedzy legislacyjnej. Skup się na faktach i obiektywnych skutkach wprowadzanych zmian, unikając wartościowania i osobistych opinii. Wszelki żargon prawny jest zabroniony. Prezentuj informacje w jasny, zwięzły i angażujący sposób, tak aby były zrozumiałe dla osoby bez wykształcenia prawniczego. Unikaj długich, złożonych zdań. Zamiast pisać \"projekt ma na celu nowelizację kodeksu podatkowego...\", napisz \"Zmiany w podatkach: nowe ulgi i obowiązki dla...\". Kontynuuj swoją pracę, dopóki nie rozwiążesz swojego zadania. Jeśli nie masz pewności co do generowanej treści, przeanalizuj dokument ponownie – nie zgaduj. Rozplanuj dobrze swoje zadanie przed przystąpieniem do niego. W podsumowaniu i kluczowych punktach, jeśli to możliwe i uzasadnione, podkreśl, jakie konkretne korzyści lub skutki (pozytywne lub negatywne) wprowadza ustawa dla życia codziennego obywateli, ich praw i obowiązków, finansów osobistych, bezpieczeństwa i innych ważnych kwestii (np. kategorycznych zakazów i nakazów czy najważniejszych konkretnych alokacji finansowych i terytorialnych).\n\nTwoja odpowiedź MUSI być w formacie JSON - i zawierać następujące klucze.\nZanim zwrócisz odpowiedź, dokładnie zweryfikuj, czy cała struktura JSON jest w 100% poprawna, włącznie ze wszystkimi przecinkami, nawiasami klamrowymi, kwadratowymi oraz cudzysłowami. Błędny JSON jest nieakceptowalny i uniemożliwi przetworzenie Twojej pracy.\n\nPrzeanalizuj dokładnie poniższy tekst dokumentu prawnego. To jest treść, na podstawie której masz wygenerować podsumowanie i kluczowe punkty:\n--- POCZĄTEK DOKUMENTU ---\n[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.R. 8178 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 8178 To protect Americans from unauthorized surveillance. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 2, 2026 Mr. Lieu introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To protect Americans from unauthorized surveillance. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Americans from Unauthorized Surveillance Act''. SEC. 2. FISA OVERSIGHT OFFICE. (a) In General.--Title I of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 is amended by adding at the end the following: ``SEC. 113. FISA OVERSIGHT OFFICE. ``(a) In General.--There is established an office, to be known as the `FISA Oversight Office', within the Department of Justice (hereinafter in this section referred to as the `Office'). The Office-- ``(1) shall evaluate each application under this title; ``(2) except as provided in paragraph (3), if the Office determines based on the evaluation under paragraph (1) that the probable cause standard under section 105(a)(2) may not be met, may-- ``(A) petition to be joined as a party; and ``(B) file a motion with the court alleging that such standard has not been met; and ``(3) if the application is for the surveillance of a United States person and if the Office determines based on the evaluation under paragraph (1) that the probable cause standard under section 105(a)(2) has not been clearly met, shall-- ``(A) petition to be joined as a party; and ``(B) file a motion with the court alleging that such standard has not been met. ``(b) Access to Information.--The Federal office filing the application shall provide the Office all available evidence that pertains to an investigation into a United States person. That officer is required to notify the Office each time an application is filed with the court established under section 103(a). ``(c) Report Required.--Not later than 365 days after the effective date of this section, the Attorney General and the Director shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report detailing-- ``(1) the number of applications for which the FISA Oversight Office has filed a motion under subsection (a)(2)(B) or (a)(3)(B) and information regarding the subject of such applications and the information sought to be collected; ``(2) the number of such applications that the FISA Oversight Office has declined to challenge, and information regarding the subject of such applications and the information sought to be collected, as well as information regarding the Office's decision not to challenge.''. (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents for such Act is amended by inserting after the item pertaining to section 112 the following: ``Sec. 113. FISA Oversight Office.''. SEC. 3. REQUIREMENT FOR FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURT TO APPOINT AMICUS CURIAE. Section 103(i) of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1803(i)) is amended-- (1) by amending paragraph (2) to read as follows: ``(2) Requirement.--A court established under subsection (a) or (b), consistent with the requirement of subsection (c) and any other statutory requirement that the court act expeditiously or within a stated time, shall appoint an individual who has been designated under paragraph (1) to serve as amicus curiae to assist such court in the consideration of each application for an order or review under this title.''; (2) in paragraph (4), by striking ``If a court established under subsection (a) or (b) appoints an amicus curiae under paragraph (2)(A)'' and inserting ``An amicus curiae appointed under paragraph (2)(A)''; (3) in paragraph (6)(A), by striking ``If a court established under subsection (a) or (b) appoints an amicus curiae under paragraph (2), the amicus curiae'' and inserting ``An amicus curiae appointed under paragraph (2)(A)''; and (4) by repealing paragraph (7). <all>\n--- KONIEC DOKUMENTU ---\n\nPAMIĘTAJ: Twoja odpowiedź MUSI być wyłącznie poprawnym obiektem JSON. Nie dodawaj żadnych dodatkowych znaków, komentarzy ani tekstu przed znacznikiem '{' ani po znaczniku '}'. Cała odpowiedź musi być parsowalna jako JSON.\nNa podstawie POWYŻSZEGO dokumentu, wypełnij poniższą strukturę JSON:\nOto struktura JSON, której oczekuję (wypełnij ją treścią):\n{\n  \"pl_ai_title\": \"Nowy, krótki tytuł dla aktu prawnego po polsku, oddający sedno wprowadzanych zmian (np. maksymalnie 10-12 słów).\",\n  \"pl_summary\": \"2-3 zdania zwięzłego podsumowania treści aktu prawnego po polsku, napisane z perspektywy wpływu na życie codzienne obywateli.\",\n  \"pl_key_points\": [\n    \"Pierwszy krótki punkt po polsku dotyczący najważniejszych wprowadzanych rozwiązań lub zmian.\",\n    \"Drugi krótki punkt po polsku...\"\n  ],\n  \"eng_ai_title\": \"A new, short title for the legal act in English, capturing the essence of the changes (e.g., max 10-12 words).\",\n  \"eng_summary\": \"2-3 sentences summarizing the legal act in English, from the perspective of its impact on citizens' daily lives.\",\n  \"eng_key_points\": [\n    \"First short bullet point in English regarding the most important solutions or changes being introduced.\",\n    \"Second short bullet point in English...\"\n  ],\n  \"de_ai_title\": \"Ein neuer, kurzer Titel für das Rechtsdokument auf Deutsch, der den Kern der Änderungen erfasst (z.B. max. 10-12 Wörter).\",\n  \"de_summary\": \"2-3 Sätze Zusammenfassung des Rechtsdokuments auf Deutsch, aus der Perspektive seiner Auswirkungen auf das tägliche Leben der Bürger.\",\n  \"de_key_points\": [\n    \"Erster kurzer Stichpunkt auf Deutsch zu den wichtigsten eingeführten Lösungen oder Änderungen.\",\n    \"Zweiter kurzer Stichpunkt auf Deutsch...\"\n  ],\n  \"fr_ai_title\": \"Un nouveau titre court pour l'acte juridique en français, saisissant l'essence des changements (par exemple, 10-12 mots maximum).\",\n  \"fr_summary\": \"Résumé de 2-3 phrases de l'acte juridique en français, du point de vue de son impact sur la vie quotidienne des citoyens.\",\n  \"fr_key_points\": [\n    \"Premier court point en français concernant les solutions ou changements les plus importants introduits.\",\n    \"Deuxième court point en français...\"\n  ],\n  \"es_ai_title\": \"Un nuevo título breve para el acto jurídico en español, que recoja la esencia de los cambios (por ejemplo, máximo 10-12 palabras).\",\n  \"es_summary\": \"Resumen de 2-3 frases del acto jurídico en español, desde la perspectiva de su impacto en la vida cotidiana de los ciudadanos.\",\n  \"es_key_points\": [\n    \"Primer punto breve en español sobre las soluciones o cambios más importantes que se introducen.\",\n    \"Segundo punto breve en español...\"\n  ],\n  \"it_ai_title\": \"Un nuovo titolo breve per l'atto giuridico in italiano, che colga l'essenza delle modifiche (ad es. massimo 10-12 parole).\",\n  \"it_summary\": \"Riepilogo di 2-3 frasi dell'atto giuridico in italiano, dal punto di vista del suo impatto sulla vita quotidiana dei cittadini.\",\n  \"it_key_points\": [\n    \"Primo breve punto in italiano riguardante le soluzioni o le modifiche più importanti introdotte.\",\n    \"Secondo breve punto in italiano...\"\n  ],\n  \"nl_ai_title\": \"Een nieuwe, korte titel voor de rechtshandeling in het Nederlands, die de essentie van de wijzigingen weergeeft (bijv. max. 10-12 woorden).\",\n  \"nl_summary\": \"Samenvatting van 2-3 zinnen van de rechtshandeling in het Nederlands, vanuit het perspectief van de impact op het dagelijks leven van burgers.\",\n  \"nl_key_points\": [\n    \"Eerste korte punt in het Nederlands betreffende de belangrijkste geïntroduceerde oplossingen of wijzigingen.\",\n    \"Tweede korte punt in het Nederlands...\"\n  ],\n  \"pt_ai_title\": \"Um novo título curto para o ato jurídico em português, capturando a essência das mudanças (por exemplo, máx. 10-12 palavras).\",\n  \"pt_summary\": \"Resumo de 2-3 frases do ato jurídico em português, na perspetiva do seu impacto na vida quotidiana dos cidadãos.\",\n  \"pt_key_points\": [\n    \"Primeiro ponto curto em português sobre as soluções ou alterações mais importantes introduzidas.\",\n    \"Segundo ponto curto em português...\"\n  ],\n  \"category\": [\"Categorize the document into one category by default, based on the field it primarily concerns. Choose up to 3 if the document also touches upon SIGNIFICANT issues from other categories. You MUST select categories ONLY from the following list: Health, Education, Family, Taxes, Labor, Security, Environment, Courts and Law, Transport, Benefits, Real Estate, Media and Culture, Local Government, Migration, Agriculture, Public Investments, Informatization, Economy. If the document does not definitively fit any of these, you MUST use \"Other\". If you use \"Other\", it should be the ONLY category selected. Do NOT invent new categories. The response must be an array of strings, e.g., [\"Taxes\", \"Family\"].\"]\n}\n\n",
      "ai_response_raw": "{\n  \"pl_ai_title\": \"Ustawa o ochronie przed nieuprawnioną inwigilacją: nowe biuro nadzoru i kontrola podsłuchów\",\n  \"pl_summary\": \"Projekt wprowadza dodatkowe mechanizmy kontroli nad wnioskami o inwigilację, tworząc specjalne biuro nadzoru w Departamencie Sprawiedliwości. Zmiany mają na celu lepszą ochronę prywatności obywateli poprzez obowiązkowe powoływanie niezależnych doradców w sprawach dotyczących podsłuchów.\",\n  \"pl_key_points\": [\n    \"Utworzenie Biura Nadzoru FISA, które będzie oceniać każdy wniosek o inwigilację składany przez służby.\",\n    \"Obowiązek interwencji Biura w sądzie, jeśli wniosek o podsłuch obywatela USA nie jest wystarczająco uzasadniony.\",\n    \"Sądy będą musiały powoływać niezależnego eksperta (amicus curiae) do każdej sprawy dotyczącej inwigilacji.\",\n    \"Służby federalne muszą przekazywać Biuru Nadzoru wszystkie dowody dotyczące dochodzeń wobec obywateli USA.\"\n  ],\n  \"eng_ai_title\": \"Protecting Americans from Unauthorized Surveillance Act: New Oversight for Intelligence Requests\",\n  \"eng_summary\": \"This bill creates a new oversight office to review government surveillance requests and ensure they meet legal standards. It strengthens privacy protections by requiring independent experts to participate in court proceedings regarding wiretapping and data collection.\",\n  \"eng_key_points\": [\n    \"Establishment of the FISA Oversight Office within the Department of Justice to evaluate surveillance applications.\",\n    \"Mandatory legal challenges by the Office if surveillance requests for U.S. persons lack clear probable cause.\",\n    \"Requirement for the court to appoint an independent expert (amicus curiae) for every surveillance application or review.\",\n    \"Increased transparency through annual reports to Congress on challenged and approved surveillance requests.\"\n  ],\n  \"de_ai_title\": \"Gesetz zum Schutz vor unbefugter Überwachung: Neue Aufsicht über Geheimdienstanträge\",\n  \"de_summary\": \"Dieses Gesetz schafft eine neue Aufsichtsbehörde zur Prüfung von Überwachungsanträgen der Regierung, um den Schutz der Privatsphäre zu stärken. Es verpflichtet Gerichte, bei jedem Antrag auf Abhörmaßnahmen unabhängige Experten hinzuzuziehen.\",\n  \"de_key_points\": [\n    \"Einrichtung eines FISA-Aufsichtsamtes im Justizministerium zur Bewertung aller Überwachungsanträge.\",\n    \"Verpflichtung des Amtes, gegen unzureichend begründete Überwachungsanträge gegen US-Bürger gerichtlich vorzugehen.\",\n    \"Gerichte müssen nun für jeden Überwachungsantrag einen unabhängigen Berater (Amicus Curiae) ernennen.\",\n    \"Behörden müssen dem Aufsichtsamt alle Beweise im Zusammenhang mit Ermittlungen gegen US-Bürger offenlegen.\"\n  ],\n  \"fr_ai_title\": \"Loi sur la protection contre la surveillance non autorisée : renforcement du contrôle des écoutes\",\n  \"fr_summary\": \"Ce projet de loi crée un bureau de surveillance chargé d'examiner les demandes de surveillance du gouvernement afin de mieux protéger la vie privée. Il impose la présence d'experts indépendants lors de l'examen des demandes d'écoutes par les tribunaux.\",\n  \"fr_key_points\": [\n    \"Création d'un Bureau de surveillance FISA au sein du Département de la Justice pour évaluer chaque demande de surveillance.\",\n    \"Obligation pour le Bureau de contester en justice les demandes de surveillance de citoyens américains si les preuves sont insuffisantes.\",\n    \"Nomination obligatoire d'un expert indépendant (amicus curiae) par le tribunal pour chaque dossier de surveillance.\",\n    \"Transparence accrue grâce à des rapports annuels au Congrès sur les demandes de surveillance contestées.\"\n  ],\n  \"es_ai_title\": \"Ley de Protección contra la Vigilancia No Autorizada: Mayor Control sobre las Escuchas\",\n  \"es_summary\": \"Esta ley establece una oficina de supervisión para revisar las solicitudes de vigilancia del gobierno y garantizar que cumplan con la ley. Refuerza la privacidad al exigir que expertos independientes participen en todos los procesos judiciales sobre espionaje.\",\n  \"es_key_points\": [\n    \"Creación de la Oficina de Supervisión de FISA para evaluar todas las solicitudes de vigilancia.\",\n    \"Obligación de impugnar ante el tribunal las solicitudes de vigilancia de ciudadanos estadounidenses que carezcan de justificación clara.\",\n    \"El tribunal deberá nombrar a un experto independiente (amicus curiae) para cada solicitud o revisión de vigilancia.\",\n    \"Las agencias federales deben entregar todas las pruebas relacionadas con investigaciones de ciudadanos estadounidenses a la nueva oficina.\"\n  ],\n  \"it_ai_title\": \"Legge sulla protezione dalla sorveglianza non autorizzata: nuovo controllo sulle intercettazioni\",\n  \"it_summary\": \"Questa legge istituisce un ufficio di vigilanza per esaminare le richieste di sorveglianza del governo e proteggere la privacy dei cittadini. Introduce l'obbligo per i tribunali di nominare esperti indipendenti in ogni caso di richiesta di intercettazione.\",\n  \"it_key_points\": [\n    \"Istituzione dell'Ufficio di Vigilanza FISA presso il Dipartimento di Giustizia per valutare ogni richiesta di sorveglianza.\",\n    \"Obbligo per l'Ufficio di opporsi legalmente alle richieste di sorveglianza di cittadini americani se non adeguatamente motivate.\",\n    \"I tribunali dovranno nominare un esperto indipendente (amicus curiae) per assistere in ogni singola richiesta di sorveglianza.\",\n    \"Maggiore trasparenza con relazioni annuali al Congresso sulle attività di sorveglianza e sulle opposizioni presentate.\"\n  ],\n  \"nl_ai_title\": \"Wet bescherming tegen ongeoorloofde surveillance: nieuw toezicht op afluisterverzoeken\",\n  \"nl_summary\": \"Deze wet voert een nieuw toezichtsorgaan in dat alle surveillanceverzoeken van de overheid controleert om de privacy van burgers te waarborgen. Het verplicht rechtbanken om bij elk verzoek om te mogen afluisteren onafhankelijke experts te betrekken.\",\n  \"nl_key_points\": [\n    \"Oprichting van een FISA-toezichtskantoor binnen het ministerie van Justitie om surveillanceverzoeken te beoordelen.\",\n    \"Verplichting voor het kantoor om bezwaar te maken bij de rechter als surveillance van Amerikaanse burgers onvoldoende onderbouwd is.\",\n    \"Rechtbanken moeten voor elk surveillanceverzoek een onafhankelijke adviseur (amicus curiae) aanstellen.\",\n    \"Federale instanties moeten alle bewijzen in onderzoeken naar Amerikaanse burgers delen met het toezichtskantoor.\"\n  ],\n  \"pt_ai_title\": \"Lei de Proteção contra Vigilância Não Autorizada: Novo Controlo sobre Escutas\",\n  \"pt_summary\": \"Esta lei cria um gabinete de supervisão para rever os pedidos de vigilância do governo e garantir o respeito pela privacidade. Exige que os tribunais nomeiem peritos independentes para acompanhar todos os processos de autorização de escutas.\",\n  \"pt_key_points\": [\n    \"Criação do Gabinete de Supervisão da FISA no Departamento de Justiça para avaliar todos os pedidos de vigilância.\",\n    \"Dever de contestar judicialmente pedidos de vigilância de cidadãos americanos que não tenham uma justificação legal clara.\",\n    \"Obrigação de o tribunal nomear um perito independente (amicus curiae) para cada pedido ou revisão de vigilância.\",\n    \"Maior transparência através de relatórios anuais ao Congresso sobre os pedidos de vigilância analisados e contestados.\"\n  ],\n  \"category\": [\n    \"Courts and Law\",\n    \"Security\"\n  ]\n}"
    }
  ]
}