{
  "legislationId": "119_HR_8229",
  "lastUpdate": "2026-04-15T11:42:55.231Z",
  "history": [
    {
      "timestamp": "2026-04-15T11:42:55.231Z",
      "source_url": "https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/hr8229/BILLS-119hr8229ih.htm",
      "model": "gemini-flash-lite-latest",
      "prompt_sent": "\nROLE: Fact Checker.\nZADANIE: Porównaj SOURCE (oryginał) i SUMMARY (streszczenie przygotowane przez inne AI).\n\nTwoim celem jest wykrycie \"ZMYŚLONYCH KONKRETÓW\" (Fabricated Entities) w SUMMARY.\n\nSOURCE:\n[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.R. 8229 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 8229 To prohibit certain uses of algorithmic decision systems to inform individualized prices for food, groceries, and agricultural commodities, and for other purposes. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 9, 2026 Mr. Pappas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To prohibit certain uses of algorithmic decision systems to inform individualized prices for food, groceries, and agricultural commodities, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Lower Grocery Prices Act''. SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON SURVEILLANCE-BASED PRICE SETTING FOR FOOD, GROCERIES, AND AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES. (a) Surveillance-Based Price Setting.-- (1) General prohibition.--A person may not engage in surveillance-based price setting for food, groceries, or agricultural commodities. If each condition in paragraph (2) is met, any of the following is not surveillance-based price setting: (A) A difference in price is based solely on reasonable costs associated with providing the good or service to different consumers. (B) A discounted price is offered to members of a broadly defined group, including teachers, veterans, senior citizens, or students, based on publicly disclosed eligibility criteria. (C) A discounted price is offered through a loyalty, membership, or rewards program that consumers affirmatively enrolled in, including signing up for a mailing list, registering for promotional communication, or participating in a promotional event. (2) Additional conditions for exception.--The conditions in this paragraph are the following: (A) Any eligibility criteria or condition for receiving or earning the discount or reward is clearly and conspicuously disclosed. (B) Any discount or reward is offered uniformly to all consumers who meet the disclosed eligibility criteria. (C) Any surveillance data is used solely to offer or administer the discount or reward and is not used for any other purpose, including profiling, targeted advertising, or individualized price setting. (3) Requirement to publish procedures.--Not later than 180 days before the date on which a person intends to engage in any of the actions described in subparagraphs (A) through (C) of paragraph (1), that person shall make publicly available, in a conspicuous and accessible format, reasonable procedures that include the following: (A) A process for ensuring the accuracy of all data considered by the automated decision system. (B) A procedure that allows a consumer to correct or challenge the accuracy of data considered by the automated decision system. (C) Disclosure to consumers what data is considered and how automated decision-making considers the data when setting particular prices. (b) Enforcement by Federal Trade Commission.-- (1) Unfair or deceptive acts or practices; unfair methods of competition.--A violation of subsection (a) or a regulation promulgated under such subsection shall be treated as a violation of a regulation under section 18(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 57a(a)(1)(B)) regarding unfair or deceptive acts or practices and as a violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 45(a)) regarding unfair methods of competition. (2) Powers of commission.--The Federal Trade Commission shall enforce subsection (a) and any regulation promulgated under such subsection in the same manner, by the same means, and with the same jurisdiction, powers, and duties as though all applicable terms and provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 41 et seq.) were incorporated into and made a part of this Act. Any person who violates such subsection or a regulation promulgated under such subsection shall be subject to the penalties and entitled to the privileges and immunities provided in the Federal Trade Commission Act. (3) Common carriers and nonprofit organizations.-- Notwithstanding section 4, 5(a)(2), or 6 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 44; 45(a)(2); 46) or any jurisdictional limitation of the Federal Trade Commission, the Federal Trade Commission shall also enforce subsection (a) or a regulation promulgated under subsection (a), in the same manner provided in paragraphs (1) and (2), with respect to-- (A) common carriers subject to the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 151 et seq.) and all Acts amendatory thereof and supplementary thereto; and (B) organizations not organized to carry on business for their own profit or that of their members. (4) Authority preserved.--Nothing in this section may be construed to limit the authority of the Commission under any other provision of law. (c) Actions by States.-- (1) In general.--In any case in which the attorney general of a State, or an official or agency of a State, has reason to believe that an interest of the residents of such State has been or is threatened or adversely affected by an act or practice in violation of subsection (a) or a regulation promulgated under such subsection, the State, as parens patriae, may bring a civil action on behalf of the residents of the State in an appropriate State court or an appropriate district court of the United States to-- (A) enjoin such act or practice; (B) enforce compliance with such subsection or such regulation; (C) obtain, per violation, the greater of-- (i) the actual monetary damages incurred from the violation; or (ii) $3,000; or (D) obtain any restitution, penalties, and any other legal or equitable relief on behalf of residents as the court may deem just and proper. (2) Rule of construction.--For purposes of bringing a civil action under this subsection, nothing in this section may be construed to prevent an attorney general, official, or agency of a State from exercising the powers conferred on the attorney general, official, or agency by the laws of such State to conduct investigations, administer oaths and affirmations, or compel the attendance of witnesses or the production of documentary and other evidence. (d) Private Right of Action.-- (1) In general.--A person injured by an act or practice in violation of subsection (a) or a regulation promulgated under such subsection may bring in an appropriate State court or an appropriate district court of the United States-- (A) to enjoin the violation; (B) to obtain, for each violation, the greater of-- (i) the actual monetary damages incurred from the violation; or (ii) $3,000; or (C) to obtain, for each violation, any other restitution, penalties, and other legal or equitable relief as the court may deem just and proper. (2) Willful violations.--If the court finds that the defendant acted willfully in committing a violation described in paragraph (1), the court may, in its discretion, increase the amount of the award to an amount equal to not more than 3 times the amount available under paragraph (1)(B). (3) Costs and attorney's fees.--The court shall award to a prevailing plaintiff in an action under this subsection the costs of such action and reasonable attorney's fees, as determined by the court. (4) Limitation.--An action may be commenced under this subsection not later than 5 years after the date on which the person first discovered or had a reasonable opportunity to discover the violation. (5) Nonexclusive remedy.--The remedy provided by this subsection shall be in addition to any other remedies available to the person. (6) Invalidity of pre-dispute arbitration and joint action waivers.--Notwithstanding chapter 1 of title 9, United States Code (commonly known as the ``Federal Arbitration Act''), or any other provision of law, a pre-dispute arbitration agreement or pre-dispute joint action waiver between a person engaged in the commerce of food, grocery, or agricultural commodities and a consumer is not valid or enforceable for purposes of this section. (e) Definitions.--In this section: (1) Automated decision system.--The term ``automated decision system''-- (A) means a system, software, or process that uses computation, the result for which is used to assist or approximate human decision-making; and (B) includes a system, software, or process derived from machine learning, statistics, or other data processing or artificial intelligence techniques. (2) Commission.--The term ``Commission'' means the Federal Trade Commission. (3) Genetic information.--The term ``genetic information''-- (A) means, with respect to an individual, information about-- (i) any genetic test; (ii) the genetic tests of any family member; and (iii) the manifestation of a disease or disorder in any family member; (B) includes, with respect to an individual, any request for, or receipt of, genetic services, or participation in clinical research which includes genetic services, by the individual or any family member of the individual; and (C) does not include information about the sex or age of the individual. (4) Personal information.--The term ``personal information'' means any quality, feature, attribute, or trait of an individual, including any immutable characteristic (such as race and eye color), mutable characteristic (such as address, weight, citizenship, family, or parenthood status), and any other information that could reasonably be linked, directly or indirectly, with a particular person or household. (5) Pre-dispute arbitration agreement.--The term ``pre- dispute arbitration agreement'' means any agreement to arbitrate a dispute that has not arisen at the time of making the agreement. (6) Pre-dispute joint action waiver.--The term ``pre- dispute joint action waiver'' means an agreement, including as part of a pre-dispute arbitration agreement, that would prohibit, or waive the right of, one of the parties to the agreement to participate in a joint, class, or collective action in a judicial, arbitral, administrative, or other forum, concerning a dispute that has not arisen at the time of making the agreement. (7) Price.--The term ``price'' means the amount charged or offered to a consumer in relation to a transaction, including any related cost and fee and any other material term of the transaction that has direct bearing on the amount paid by the consumer or the value of the good or service offered or provided to the consumer. (8) Surveillance-based price setting.--The term ``surveillance-based price setting'' means using an automated decision system to offer or inform a customized price for a good or service for a specific person or consumer, or group of people or consumers, based, in whole or in part, on surveillance data. (9) Surveillance data.--The term ``surveillance data''-- (A) means data obtained through observation, inference, or surveillance of an individual that is related to personal information, genetic information, behavior, or biometrics of the individual or a group, band, class, or tier in which the individual belongs; and (B) includes information gathered, purchased, or otherwise acquired. (f) Preemption of Directly Conflicting State Laws.-- (1) In general.--Nothing in this section may be construed to preempt, displace, or supplant any State law, except to the extent that a provision of State law conflicts with a provision of this section. (2) Greater protection under state law.--For the purposes of this section, a provision of State law does not conflict with a provision of this section if such State law provides additional protections with respect to individuals protected under this section with respect to surveillance-based wage setting or the collection of surveillance data. <all>\n\nSUMMARY TO EVALUATE:\nTitle: Ban on personalized grocery pricing based on consumer surveillance\nSummary: This bill prohibits stores from using AI and personal data to set different prices for food and groceries for different people. It aims to ensure that grocery prices are fair and not based on tracking your personal habits or characteristics.\nKey Points: Prohibits using automated systems to set individualized prices based on surveillance data., Requires stores to clearly disclose how they use data for loyalty programs and discounts., Allows citizens to sue for at least $3,000 in damages if their rights are violated., Prevents companies from forcing customers into private arbitration for these disputes., Maintains standard discounts for groups like seniors, veterans, and students.\n\nZASADY OCENY:\n1. Sprawdź wszystkie LICZBY, DATY i KWOTY w SUMMARY. Jeśli którejś brakuje w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n2. Sprawdź wszystkie NAZWISKA, ORGANIZACJE i MIEJSCA w SUMMARY. Jeśli którejś brakuje w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n3. Sprawdź wszystkie konkretne DZIAŁANIA PRAWNE . Jeśli tego mechanizmu nie ma w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n\nWAŻNE: Abstrakcyjne pojęcia (np. \"transparentność\", \"zaufanie\") są dozwolone jako wnioski.\n\nOUTPUT (JSON):\n{\n  \"is_valid\": true/false,\n  \"issue\": \"fabricated_entity\" / \"contradiction\" / \"none\"\n}\n\nWYMAGANIA FORMATOWANIA:\n1. Odpowiedz WYŁĄCZNIE surowym obiektem JSON.\n2. NIE używaj bloków kodu Markdown.\n3. NIE dodawaj żadnych wstępów ani wyjaśnień przed ani po JSONie.\n4. JSON musi być poprawny i gotowy do parsowania.\n\n",
      "ai_response_raw": "{\n  \"is_valid\": true,\n  \"issue\": \"none\"\n}"
    },
    {
      "timestamp": "2026-04-15T11:26:11.216Z",
      "source_url": "https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/hr8229/BILLS-119hr8229ih.htm",
      "model": "gemini-flash-latest",
      "prompt_sent": "\nJesteś ekspertem od prawa Stanów Zjednoczonych, który ma za zadanie analizować dokumenty ustaw, uchwał oraz innych dokumentów legislacyjnych, a następnie przygotowywać z nich informacje w przystępny sposób dla obywateli. Twoim celem jest przedstawienie informacji tak, aby obywatele mogli sami ocenić wpływ legislacji na ich życie, nawet bez posiadania specjalistycznej wiedzy legislacyjnej. Skup się na faktach i obiektywnych skutkach wprowadzanych zmian, unikając wartościowania i osobistych opinii. Wszelki żargon prawny jest zabroniony. Prezentuj informacje w jasny, zwięzły i angażujący sposób, tak aby były zrozumiałe dla osoby bez wykształcenia prawniczego. Unikaj długich, złożonych zdań. Zamiast pisać \"projekt ma na celu nowelizację kodeksu podatkowego...\", napisz \"Zmiany w podatkach: nowe ulgi i obowiązki dla...\". Kontynuuj swoją pracę, dopóki nie rozwiążesz swojego zadania. Jeśli nie masz pewności co do generowanej treści, przeanalizuj dokument ponownie – nie zgaduj. Rozplanuj dobrze swoje zadanie przed przystąpieniem do niego. W podsumowaniu i kluczowych punktach, jeśli to możliwe i uzasadnione, podkreśl, jakie konkretne korzyści lub skutki (pozytywne lub negatywne) wprowadza ustawa dla życia codziennego obywateli, ich praw i obowiązków, finansów osobistych, bezpieczeństwa i innych ważnych kwestii (np. kategorycznych zakazów i nakazów czy najważniejszych konkretnych alokacji finansowych i terytorialnych).\n\nTwoja odpowiedź MUSI być w formacie JSON - i zawierać następujące klucze.\nZanim zwrócisz odpowiedź, dokładnie zweryfikuj, czy cała struktura JSON jest w 100% poprawna, włącznie ze wszystkimi przecinkami, nawiasami klamrowymi, kwadratowymi oraz cudzysłowami. Błędny JSON jest nieakceptowalny i uniemożliwi przetworzenie Twojej pracy.\n\nPrzeanalizuj dokładnie poniższy tekst dokumentu prawnego. To jest treść, na podstawie której masz wygenerować podsumowanie i kluczowe punkty:\n--- POCZĄTEK DOKUMENTU ---\n[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.R. 8229 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 8229 To prohibit certain uses of algorithmic decision systems to inform individualized prices for food, groceries, and agricultural commodities, and for other purposes. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 9, 2026 Mr. Pappas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To prohibit certain uses of algorithmic decision systems to inform individualized prices for food, groceries, and agricultural commodities, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Lower Grocery Prices Act''. SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON SURVEILLANCE-BASED PRICE SETTING FOR FOOD, GROCERIES, AND AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES. (a) Surveillance-Based Price Setting.-- (1) General prohibition.--A person may not engage in surveillance-based price setting for food, groceries, or agricultural commodities. If each condition in paragraph (2) is met, any of the following is not surveillance-based price setting: (A) A difference in price is based solely on reasonable costs associated with providing the good or service to different consumers. (B) A discounted price is offered to members of a broadly defined group, including teachers, veterans, senior citizens, or students, based on publicly disclosed eligibility criteria. (C) A discounted price is offered through a loyalty, membership, or rewards program that consumers affirmatively enrolled in, including signing up for a mailing list, registering for promotional communication, or participating in a promotional event. (2) Additional conditions for exception.--The conditions in this paragraph are the following: (A) Any eligibility criteria or condition for receiving or earning the discount or reward is clearly and conspicuously disclosed. (B) Any discount or reward is offered uniformly to all consumers who meet the disclosed eligibility criteria. (C) Any surveillance data is used solely to offer or administer the discount or reward and is not used for any other purpose, including profiling, targeted advertising, or individualized price setting. (3) Requirement to publish procedures.--Not later than 180 days before the date on which a person intends to engage in any of the actions described in subparagraphs (A) through (C) of paragraph (1), that person shall make publicly available, in a conspicuous and accessible format, reasonable procedures that include the following: (A) A process for ensuring the accuracy of all data considered by the automated decision system. (B) A procedure that allows a consumer to correct or challenge the accuracy of data considered by the automated decision system. (C) Disclosure to consumers what data is considered and how automated decision-making considers the data when setting particular prices. (b) Enforcement by Federal Trade Commission.-- (1) Unfair or deceptive acts or practices; unfair methods of competition.--A violation of subsection (a) or a regulation promulgated under such subsection shall be treated as a violation of a regulation under section 18(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 57a(a)(1)(B)) regarding unfair or deceptive acts or practices and as a violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 45(a)) regarding unfair methods of competition. (2) Powers of commission.--The Federal Trade Commission shall enforce subsection (a) and any regulation promulgated under such subsection in the same manner, by the same means, and with the same jurisdiction, powers, and duties as though all applicable terms and provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 41 et seq.) were incorporated into and made a part of this Act. Any person who violates such subsection or a regulation promulgated under such subsection shall be subject to the penalties and entitled to the privileges and immunities provided in the Federal Trade Commission Act. (3) Common carriers and nonprofit organizations.-- Notwithstanding section 4, 5(a)(2), or 6 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 44; 45(a)(2); 46) or any jurisdictional limitation of the Federal Trade Commission, the Federal Trade Commission shall also enforce subsection (a) or a regulation promulgated under subsection (a), in the same manner provided in paragraphs (1) and (2), with respect to-- (A) common carriers subject to the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 151 et seq.) and all Acts amendatory thereof and supplementary thereto; and (B) organizations not organized to carry on business for their own profit or that of their members. (4) Authority preserved.--Nothing in this section may be construed to limit the authority of the Commission under any other provision of law. (c) Actions by States.-- (1) In general.--In any case in which the attorney general of a State, or an official or agency of a State, has reason to believe that an interest of the residents of such State has been or is threatened or adversely affected by an act or practice in violation of subsection (a) or a regulation promulgated under such subsection, the State, as parens patriae, may bring a civil action on behalf of the residents of the State in an appropriate State court or an appropriate district court of the United States to-- (A) enjoin such act or practice; (B) enforce compliance with such subsection or such regulation; (C) obtain, per violation, the greater of-- (i) the actual monetary damages incurred from the violation; or (ii) $3,000; or (D) obtain any restitution, penalties, and any other legal or equitable relief on behalf of residents as the court may deem just and proper. (2) Rule of construction.--For purposes of bringing a civil action under this subsection, nothing in this section may be construed to prevent an attorney general, official, or agency of a State from exercising the powers conferred on the attorney general, official, or agency by the laws of such State to conduct investigations, administer oaths and affirmations, or compel the attendance of witnesses or the production of documentary and other evidence. (d) Private Right of Action.-- (1) In general.--A person injured by an act or practice in violation of subsection (a) or a regulation promulgated under such subsection may bring in an appropriate State court or an appropriate district court of the United States-- (A) to enjoin the violation; (B) to obtain, for each violation, the greater of-- (i) the actual monetary damages incurred from the violation; or (ii) $3,000; or (C) to obtain, for each violation, any other restitution, penalties, and other legal or equitable relief as the court may deem just and proper. (2) Willful violations.--If the court finds that the defendant acted willfully in committing a violation described in paragraph (1), the court may, in its discretion, increase the amount of the award to an amount equal to not more than 3 times the amount available under paragraph (1)(B). (3) Costs and attorney's fees.--The court shall award to a prevailing plaintiff in an action under this subsection the costs of such action and reasonable attorney's fees, as determined by the court. (4) Limitation.--An action may be commenced under this subsection not later than 5 years after the date on which the person first discovered or had a reasonable opportunity to discover the violation. (5) Nonexclusive remedy.--The remedy provided by this subsection shall be in addition to any other remedies available to the person. (6) Invalidity of pre-dispute arbitration and joint action waivers.--Notwithstanding chapter 1 of title 9, United States Code (commonly known as the ``Federal Arbitration Act''), or any other provision of law, a pre-dispute arbitration agreement or pre-dispute joint action waiver between a person engaged in the commerce of food, grocery, or agricultural commodities and a consumer is not valid or enforceable for purposes of this section. (e) Definitions.--In this section: (1) Automated decision system.--The term ``automated decision system''-- (A) means a system, software, or process that uses computation, the result for which is used to assist or approximate human decision-making; and (B) includes a system, software, or process derived from machine learning, statistics, or other data processing or artificial intelligence techniques. (2) Commission.--The term ``Commission'' means the Federal Trade Commission. (3) Genetic information.--The term ``genetic information''-- (A) means, with respect to an individual, information about-- (i) any genetic test; (ii) the genetic tests of any family member; and (iii) the manifestation of a disease or disorder in any family member; (B) includes, with respect to an individual, any request for, or receipt of, genetic services, or participation in clinical research which includes genetic services, by the individual or any family member of the individual; and (C) does not include information about the sex or age of the individual. (4) Personal information.--The term ``personal information'' means any quality, feature, attribute, or trait of an individual, including any immutable characteristic (such as race and eye color), mutable characteristic (such as address, weight, citizenship, family, or parenthood status), and any other information that could reasonably be linked, directly or indirectly, with a particular person or household. (5) Pre-dispute arbitration agreement.--The term ``pre- dispute arbitration agreement'' means any agreement to arbitrate a dispute that has not arisen at the time of making the agreement. (6) Pre-dispute joint action waiver.--The term ``pre- dispute joint action waiver'' means an agreement, including as part of a pre-dispute arbitration agreement, that would prohibit, or waive the right of, one of the parties to the agreement to participate in a joint, class, or collective action in a judicial, arbitral, administrative, or other forum, concerning a dispute that has not arisen at the time of making the agreement. (7) Price.--The term ``price'' means the amount charged or offered to a consumer in relation to a transaction, including any related cost and fee and any other material term of the transaction that has direct bearing on the amount paid by the consumer or the value of the good or service offered or provided to the consumer. (8) Surveillance-based price setting.--The term ``surveillance-based price setting'' means using an automated decision system to offer or inform a customized price for a good or service for a specific person or consumer, or group of people or consumers, based, in whole or in part, on surveillance data. (9) Surveillance data.--The term ``surveillance data''-- (A) means data obtained through observation, inference, or surveillance of an individual that is related to personal information, genetic information, behavior, or biometrics of the individual or a group, band, class, or tier in which the individual belongs; and (B) includes information gathered, purchased, or otherwise acquired. (f) Preemption of Directly Conflicting State Laws.-- (1) In general.--Nothing in this section may be construed to preempt, displace, or supplant any State law, except to the extent that a provision of State law conflicts with a provision of this section. (2) Greater protection under state law.--For the purposes of this section, a provision of State law does not conflict with a provision of this section if such State law provides additional protections with respect to individuals protected under this section with respect to surveillance-based wage setting or the collection of surveillance data. <all>\n--- KONIEC DOKUMENTU ---\n\nPAMIĘTAJ: Twoja odpowiedź MUSI być wyłącznie poprawnym obiektem JSON. Nie dodawaj żadnych dodatkowych znaków, komentarzy ani tekstu przed znacznikiem '{' ani po znaczniku '}'. Cała odpowiedź musi być parsowalna jako JSON.\nNa podstawie POWYŻSZEGO dokumentu, wypełnij poniższą strukturę JSON:\nOto struktura JSON, której oczekuję (wypełnij ją treścią):\n{\n  \"pl_ai_title\": \"Nowy, krótki tytuł dla aktu prawnego po polsku, oddający sedno wprowadzanych zmian (np. maksymalnie 10-12 słów).\",\n  \"pl_summary\": \"2-3 zdania zwięzłego podsumowania treści aktu prawnego po polsku, napisane z perspektywy wpływu na życie codzienne obywateli.\",\n  \"pl_key_points\": [\n    \"Pierwszy krótki punkt po polsku dotyczący najważniejszych wprowadzanych rozwiązań lub zmian.\",\n    \"Drugi krótki punkt po polsku...\"\n  ],\n  \"eng_ai_title\": \"A new, short title for the legal act in English, capturing the essence of the changes (e.g., max 10-12 words).\",\n  \"eng_summary\": \"2-3 sentences summarizing the legal act in English, from the perspective of its impact on citizens' daily lives.\",\n  \"eng_key_points\": [\n    \"First short bullet point in English regarding the most important solutions or changes being introduced.\",\n    \"Second short bullet point in English...\"\n  ],\n  \"de_ai_title\": \"Ein neuer, kurzer Titel für das Rechtsdokument auf Deutsch, der den Kern der Änderungen erfasst (z.B. max. 10-12 Wörter).\",\n  \"de_summary\": \"2-3 Sätze Zusammenfassung des Rechtsdokuments auf Deutsch, aus der Perspektive seiner Auswirkungen auf das tägliche Leben der Bürger.\",\n  \"de_key_points\": [\n    \"Erster kurzer Stichpunkt auf Deutsch zu den wichtigsten eingeführten Lösungen oder Änderungen.\",\n    \"Zweiter kurzer Stichpunkt auf Deutsch...\"\n  ],\n  \"fr_ai_title\": \"Un nouveau titre court pour l'acte juridique en français, saisissant l'essence des changements (par exemple, 10-12 mots maximum).\",\n  \"fr_summary\": \"Résumé de 2-3 phrases de l'acte juridique en français, du point de vue de son impact sur la vie quotidienne des citoyens.\",\n  \"fr_key_points\": [\n    \"Premier court point en français concernant les solutions ou changements les plus importants introduits.\",\n    \"Deuxième court point en français...\"\n  ],\n  \"es_ai_title\": \"Un nuevo título breve para el acto jurídico en español, que recoja la esencia de los cambios (por ejemplo, máximo 10-12 palabras).\",\n  \"es_summary\": \"Resumen de 2-3 frases del acto jurídico en español, desde la perspectiva de su impacto en la vida cotidiana de los ciudadanos.\",\n  \"es_key_points\": [\n    \"Primer punto breve en español sobre las soluciones o cambios más importantes que se introducen.\",\n    \"Segundo punto breve en español...\"\n  ],\n  \"it_ai_title\": \"Un nuovo titolo breve per l'atto giuridico in italiano, che colga l'essenza delle modifiche (ad es. massimo 10-12 parole).\",\n  \"it_summary\": \"Riepilogo di 2-3 frasi dell'atto giuridico in italiano, dal punto di vista del suo impatto sulla vita quotidiana dei cittadini.\",\n  \"it_key_points\": [\n    \"Primo breve punto in italiano riguardante le soluzioni o le modifiche più importanti introdotte.\",\n    \"Secondo breve punto in italiano...\"\n  ],\n  \"nl_ai_title\": \"Een nieuwe, korte titel voor de rechtshandeling in het Nederlands, die de essentie van de wijzigingen weergeeft (bijv. max. 10-12 woorden).\",\n  \"nl_summary\": \"Samenvatting van 2-3 zinnen van de rechtshandeling in het Nederlands, vanuit het perspectief van de impact op het dagelijks leven van burgers.\",\n  \"nl_key_points\": [\n    \"Eerste korte punt in het Nederlands betreffende de belangrijkste geïntroduceerde oplossingen of wijzigingen.\",\n    \"Tweede korte punt in het Nederlands...\"\n  ],\n  \"pt_ai_title\": \"Um novo título curto para o ato jurídico em português, capturando a essência das mudanças (por exemplo, máx. 10-12 palavras).\",\n  \"pt_summary\": \"Resumo de 2-3 frases do ato jurídico em português, na perspetiva do seu impacto na vida quotidiana dos cidadãos.\",\n  \"pt_key_points\": [\n    \"Primeiro ponto curto em português sobre as soluções ou alterações mais importantes introduzidas.\",\n    \"Segundo ponto curto em português...\"\n  ],\n  \"category\": [\"Categorize the document into one category by default, based on the field it primarily concerns. Choose up to 3 if the document also touches upon SIGNIFICANT issues from other categories. You MUST select categories ONLY from the following list: Health, Education, Family, Taxes, Labor, Security, Environment, Courts and Law, Transport, Benefits, Real Estate, Media and Culture, Local Government, Migration, Agriculture, Public Investments, Informatization, Economy. If the document does not definitively fit any of these, you MUST use \"Other\". If you use \"Other\", it should be the ONLY category selected. Do NOT invent new categories. The response must be an array of strings, e.g., [\"Taxes\", \"Family\"].\"]\n}\n\n",
      "ai_response_raw": "{\n  \"pl_ai_title\": \"Zakaz indywidualnych cen żywności opartych na śledzeniu konsumentów\",\n  \"pl_summary\": \"Ustawa zakazuje sklepom stosowania algorytmów do ustalania różnych cen żywności dla poszczególnych klientów na podstawie ich danych osobowych i zachowań. Dzięki temu ceny w sklepach spożywczych mają być bardziej przejrzyste i sprawiedliwe dla wszystkich kupujących.\",\n  \"pl_key_points\": [\n    \"Zakaz ustalania cen na podstawie śledzenia zachowań i danych o klientach.\",\n    \"Sklepy muszą jasno informować o zasadach przyznawania zniżek w programach lojalnościowych.\",\n    \"Możliwość uzyskania co najmniej 3000 USD odszkodowania za naruszenie przepisów przez sklep.\",\n    \"Zakaz zmuszania klientów do arbitrażu, co ułatwia dochodzenie praw w sądzie.\",\n    \"Wyjątki dla zniżek grupowych (np. dla seniorów lub weteranów) pozostają dozwolone.\"\n  ],\n  \"eng_ai_title\": \"Ban on personalized grocery pricing based on consumer surveillance\",\n  \"eng_summary\": \"This bill prohibits stores from using AI and personal data to set different prices for food and groceries for different people. It aims to ensure that grocery prices are fair and not based on tracking your personal habits or characteristics.\",\n  \"eng_key_points\": [\n    \"Prohibits using automated systems to set individualized prices based on surveillance data.\",\n    \"Requires stores to clearly disclose how they use data for loyalty programs and discounts.\",\n    \"Allows citizens to sue for at least $3,000 in damages if their rights are violated.\",\n    \"Prevents companies from forcing customers into private arbitration for these disputes.\",\n    \"Maintains standard discounts for groups like seniors, veterans, and students.\"\n  ],\n  \"de_ai_title\": \"Verbot personalisierter Lebensmittelpreise basierend auf Verbraucherüberwachung\",\n  \"de_summary\": \"Dieses Gesetz verbietet es Geschäften, Algorithmen zu nutzen, um individuelle Preise für Lebensmittel basierend auf dem Verhalten oder persönlichen Daten der Kunden festzulegen. Ziel ist es, faire und transparente Preise für alle Verbraucher zu gewährleisten.\",\n  \"de_key_points\": [\n    \"Verbot der Preisgestaltung basierend auf der Überwachung von Kundendaten.\",\n    \"Pflicht zur Offenlegung der Datennutzung bei Treueprogrammen und Rabatten.\",\n    \"Bürger können bei Verstößen auf mindestens 3.000 USD Schadensersatz klagen.\",\n    \"Verbot von Schiedsgerichtsklauseln, um den Zugang zu ordentlichen Gerichten zu sichern.\",\n    \"Gruppenrabatte für Senioren oder Studenten bleiben unter klaren Bedingungen erlaubt.\"\n  ],\n  \"fr_ai_title\": \"Interdiction des prix alimentaires personnalisés basés sur la surveillance des consommateurs\",\n  \"fr_summary\": \"Ce projet de loi interdit aux magasins d'utiliser des algorithmes pour fixer des prix différents pour les produits alimentaires en fonction des données personnelles des clients. L'objectif est de garantir que les prix en épicerie soient équitables et transparents pour tous.\",\n  \"fr_key_points\": [\n    \"Interdiction de fixer des prix individuels basés sur le suivi du comportement des clients.\",\n    \"Obligation pour les magasins de divulguer clairement comment les données sont utilisées pour les remises.\",\n    \"Possibilité pour les citoyens de réclamer au moins 3 000 $ de dommages et intérêts en cas de violation.\",\n    \"Suppression des clauses d'arbitrage forcé pour faciliter les recours en justice.\",\n    \"Maintien des réductions pour des groupes spécifiques comme les seniors ou les vétérans.\"\n  ],\n  \"es_ai_title\": \"Prohibición de precios personalizados en alimentos basados en la vigilancia del consumidor\",\n  \"es_summary\": \"Esta ley prohíbe que las tiendas utilicen algoritmos para fijar precios distintos de alimentos para cada persona basándose en sus datos personales. Busca asegurar que los precios en los supermercados sean justos y no dependan del rastreo de hábitos individuales.\",\n  \"es_key_points\": [\n    \"Prohibición de usar sistemas automáticos para fijar precios basados en datos de vigilancia.\",\n    \"Obligación de informar claramente sobre el uso de datos en programas de lealtad.\",\n    \"Derecho de los ciudadanos a demandar por un mínimo de 3,000 USD por infracción.\",\n    \"Invalidez de acuerdos de arbitraje previo para facilitar el acceso a los tribunales.\",\n    \"Se permiten descuentos grupales transparentes para jubilados, estudiantes o veteranos.\"\n  ],\n  \"it_ai_title\": \"Divieto di prezzi alimentari personalizzati basati sulla sorveglianza dei consumatori\",\n  \"it_summary\": \"Questa legge impedisce ai negozi di usare algoritmi per stabilire prezzi diversi per i generi alimentari basandosi sui dati personali dei clienti. L'obiettivo è garantire che i prezzi siano equi e non derivino dal monitoraggio dei comportamenti individuali.\",\n  \"it_key_points\": [\n    \"Divieto di fissare prezzi individuali tramite sistemi di sorveglianza dei dati.\",\n    \"Obbligo di trasparenza sull'uso dei dati per sconti e programmi fedeltà.\",\n    \"Possibilità per i cittadini di richiedere almeno 3.000 USD di risarcimento per violazione.\",\n    \"Invalidità delle clausole di arbitrato forzato per queste controversie legali.\",\n    \"Restano validi gli sconti per categorie come anziani, studenti o veterani.\"\n  ],\n  \"nl_ai_title\": \"Verbod op gepersonaliseerde voedselprijzen op basis van consumentensurveillance\",\n  \"nl_summary\": \"Deze wet verbiedt winkels om algoritmen te gebruiken om verschillende prijzen voor levensmiddelen vast te stellen op basis van persoonlijke gegevens van klanten. Het doel is om ervoor te zorgen dat prijzen in de supermarkt eerlijk en transparant zijn voor iedereen.\",\n  \"nl_key_points\": [\n    \"Verbod op prijsstelling op basis van het volgen van klantgedrag en gegevens.\",\n    \"Winkels moeten duidelijk maken hoe gegevens worden gebruikt voor kortingen en extra's.\",\n    \"Burgers kunnen bij overtredingen een schadevergoeding van minimaal $ 3.000 eisen.\",\n    \"Verbod op gedwongen arbitrage, waardoor de gang naar de rechter makkelijker wordt.\",\n    \"Groepskortingen voor bijvoorbeeld senioren of studenten blijven onder voorwaarden toegestaan.\"\n  ],\n  \"pt_ai_title\": \"Proibição de preços personalizados em alimentos baseados na vigilância dos consumidores\",\n  \"pt_summary\": \"Esta lei proíbe que as lojas utilizem algoritmos para definir preços diferentes de alimentos para cada cliente com base nos seus dados pessoais. O objetivo é garantir que os preços nos supermercados sejam justos e não dependam da monitorização de hábitos.\",\n  \"pt_key_points\": [\n    \"Proibição de fixar preços individuais com base em dados de vigilância e comportamento.\",\n    \"Obrigação de divulgar claramente como os dados são usados em programas de fidelidade.\",\n    \"Direito dos cidadãos a processar por um valor mínimo de 3.000 USD por violação.\",\n    \"Invalidade de cláusulas de arbitragem forçada para facilitar o acesso à justiça.\",\n    \"Descontos para grupos como idosos ou estudantes continuam a ser permitidos.\"\n  ],\n  \"category\": [\"Economy\", \"Agriculture\", \"Courts and Law\"]\n}"
    }
  ]
}