{
  "legislationId": "119_HR_8249",
  "lastUpdate": "2026-04-16T07:53:23.247Z",
  "history": [
    {
      "timestamp": "2026-04-16T07:53:23.247Z",
      "source_url": "https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/hr8249/BILLS-119hr8249ih.htm",
      "model": "gemini-flash-lite-latest",
      "prompt_sent": "\nROLE: Fact Checker.\nZADANIE: Porównaj SOURCE (oryginał) i SUMMARY (streszczenie przygotowane przez inne AI).\n\nTwoim celem jest wykrycie \"ZMYŚLONYCH KONKRETÓW\" (Fabricated Entities) w SUMMARY.\n\nSOURCE:\n[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.R. 8249 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 8249 To amend the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 to clarify the scope of review, establish limits for judicial review of environmental documents relating to energy infrastructure, and for other purposes. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 13, 2026 Mr. Gottheimer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To amend the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 to clarify the scope of review, establish limits for judicial review of environmental documents relating to energy infrastructure, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Making Reviews Certain Act''. SEC. 2. SCOPE OF REVIEW. Section 106 of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4336) is amended-- (1) in the heading, by inserting ``; scope of review'' after ``level of review''; and (2) by adding at the end the following: ``(c) Scope of Review.--In preparing an environmental document for a proposed agency action, a Federal agency is only required to consider those effects that share a reasonably close causal relationship to, and are proximately caused by, the immediate project or action under consideration, to comply with the requirements of this Act.''. SEC. 3. LIMITATIONS ON JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS RELATING TO ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE. Title I of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4331 et seq.) is amended-- (1) by redesignating section 112 as section 110A and moving such section so as to appear after section 110; and (2) by inserting before section 111 the following: ``SEC. 110B. LIMITATIONS ON JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS RELATING TO ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE. ``(a) Limitations on Claims.-- ``(1) In general.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law (except as provided in subparagraph (A) with respect to a shorter deadline), a claim challenging whether a final agency action relating to energy infrastructure complies with the requirements of this Act shall be barred unless-- ``(A) such claim is filed not later than 180 days after the final agency action is made public, unless a shorter deadline is specified under law; ``(B) in the case of a final agency action for which there was a public comment period on an environmental document, such claim-- ``(i) is filed by a party that submitted a substantive and unique comment during such public comment period by the noticed comment deadline for the environmental document and such comment was sufficiently detailed to put the applicable Federal agency on notice of the issue upon which the party seeks review; and ``(ii) concerns the same subject matter raised in the comment submitted during the public comment period; ``(C) such claim is filed by a party that has suffered or imminently will suffer direct harm from the final agency action; and ``(D) such claim does not challenge the establishment of a categorical exclusion. ``(2) Energy infrastructure defined.--In this subsection, the term `energy infrastructure' means a facility, and associated equipment, used for enabling the identification, leasing, development, production, processing, transportation, transmission, refining, and generation needed for energy. ``(b) Limitations on Remand.-- ``(1) In general.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no final agency action shall be vacated by a court, following a decision on the merits, unless the court determines that-- ``(A) the major Federal action for which the environmental document or final agency action is prepared will pose a significant risk of a proximate and substantial environmental harm; and ``(B) there is no other equitable remedy available as a matter of law. ``(2) Remand.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, if a court determines there are errors or deficiencies with an environmental document or final agency action that need to be corrected-- ``(A) the court may remand the environmental document to the applicable Federal agency with specific instruction to correct such errors or deficiencies within 180 days from the date on which the order of the court was issued to the applicable Federal agency; and ``(B) the major Federal action may be carried out pursuant to the final agency action notwithstanding the remand of the environmental document or final agency action under subparagraph (A), including during the time prescribed by the court to the Federal agency to correct such errors or deficiencies, so long as the court has not determined that vacatur is appropriate under paragraph (1). ``(c) No Effect on Review of Compliance With Other Deadlines.--This section shall not affect the right to obtain review under section 107(g)(3).''. SEC. 4. DEFERENCE TO AGENCIES IN JUDICIAL REVIEW. Section 111 of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4336e) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``(14) Reasonably foreseeable.--To comply with the requirements of this Act, the term `reasonably foreseeable', with respect to environmental effects of a proposed agency action, means effects that share a reasonably close causal relationship to, and are proximately caused by, the immediate project or action under consideration.''. <all>\n\nSUMMARY TO EVALUATE:\nTitle: Making Reviews Certain Act: Streamlining Energy Infrastructure Approvals\nSummary: This bill limits environmental reviews to direct impacts and sets strict deadlines for legal challenges against energy projects. It aims to speed up energy infrastructure development by narrowing the grounds for lawsuits.\nKey Points: Sets a 180-day deadline to challenge final agency decisions on energy projects., Requires agencies to only consider environmental effects directly caused by the specific project., Limits the right to sue to parties who submitted detailed, unique comments during public review., Allows projects to proceed during court-ordered document corrections unless there is a significant environmental risk.\n\nZASADY OCENY:\n1. Sprawdź wszystkie LICZBY, DATY i KWOTY w SUMMARY. Jeśli którejś brakuje w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n2. Sprawdź wszystkie NAZWISKA, ORGANIZACJE i MIEJSCA w SUMMARY. Jeśli którejś brakuje w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n3. Sprawdź wszystkie konkretne DZIAŁANIA PRAWNE . Jeśli tego mechanizmu nie ma w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n\nWAŻNE: Abstrakcyjne pojęcia (np. \"transparentność\", \"zaufanie\") są dozwolone jako wnioski.\n\nOUTPUT (JSON):\n{\n  \"is_valid\": true/false,\n  \"issue\": \"fabricated_entity\" / \"contradiction\" / \"none\"\n}\n\nWYMAGANIA FORMATOWANIA:\n1. Odpowiedz WYŁĄCZNIE surowym obiektem JSON.\n2. NIE używaj bloków kodu Markdown.\n3. NIE dodawaj żadnych wstępów ani wyjaśnień przed ani po JSONie.\n4. JSON musi być poprawny i gotowy do parsowania.\n\n",
      "ai_response_raw": "{\n  \"is_valid\": true,\n  \"issue\": \"none\"\n}"
    },
    {
      "timestamp": "2026-04-16T07:47:48.049Z",
      "source_url": "https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/hr8249/BILLS-119hr8249ih.htm",
      "model": "gemini-flash-latest",
      "prompt_sent": "\nJesteś ekspertem od prawa Stanów Zjednoczonych, który ma za zadanie analizować dokumenty ustaw, uchwał oraz innych dokumentów legislacyjnych, a następnie przygotowywać z nich informacje w przystępny sposób dla obywateli. Twoim celem jest przedstawienie informacji tak, aby obywatele mogli sami ocenić wpływ legislacji na ich życie, nawet bez posiadania specjalistycznej wiedzy legislacyjnej. Skup się na faktach i obiektywnych skutkach wprowadzanych zmian, unikając wartościowania i osobistych opinii. Wszelki żargon prawny jest zabroniony. Prezentuj informacje w jasny, zwięzły i angażujący sposób, tak aby były zrozumiałe dla osoby bez wykształcenia prawniczego. Unikaj długich, złożonych zdań. Zamiast pisać \"projekt ma na celu nowelizację kodeksu podatkowego...\", napisz \"Zmiany w podatkach: nowe ulgi i obowiązki dla...\". Kontynuuj swoją pracę, dopóki nie rozwiążesz swojego zadania. Jeśli nie masz pewności co do generowanej treści, przeanalizuj dokument ponownie – nie zgaduj. Rozplanuj dobrze swoje zadanie przed przystąpieniem do niego. W podsumowaniu i kluczowych punktach, jeśli to możliwe i uzasadnione, podkreśl, jakie konkretne korzyści lub skutki (pozytywne lub negatywne) wprowadza ustawa dla życia codziennego obywateli, ich praw i obowiązków, finansów osobistych, bezpieczeństwa i innych ważnych kwestii (np. kategorycznych zakazów i nakazów czy najważniejszych konkretnych alokacji finansowych i terytorialnych).\n\nTwoja odpowiedź MUSI być w formacie JSON - i zawierać następujące klucze.\nZanim zwrócisz odpowiedź, dokładnie zweryfikuj, czy cała struktura JSON jest w 100% poprawna, włącznie ze wszystkimi przecinkami, nawiasami klamrowymi, kwadratowymi oraz cudzysłowami. Błędny JSON jest nieakceptowalny i uniemożliwi przetworzenie Twojej pracy.\n\nPrzeanalizuj dokładnie poniższy tekst dokumentu prawnego. To jest treść, na podstawie której masz wygenerować podsumowanie i kluczowe punkty:\n--- POCZĄTEK DOKUMENTU ---\n[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.R. 8249 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 8249 To amend the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 to clarify the scope of review, establish limits for judicial review of environmental documents relating to energy infrastructure, and for other purposes. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 13, 2026 Mr. Gottheimer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To amend the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 to clarify the scope of review, establish limits for judicial review of environmental documents relating to energy infrastructure, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Making Reviews Certain Act''. SEC. 2. SCOPE OF REVIEW. Section 106 of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4336) is amended-- (1) in the heading, by inserting ``; scope of review'' after ``level of review''; and (2) by adding at the end the following: ``(c) Scope of Review.--In preparing an environmental document for a proposed agency action, a Federal agency is only required to consider those effects that share a reasonably close causal relationship to, and are proximately caused by, the immediate project or action under consideration, to comply with the requirements of this Act.''. SEC. 3. LIMITATIONS ON JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS RELATING TO ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE. Title I of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4331 et seq.) is amended-- (1) by redesignating section 112 as section 110A and moving such section so as to appear after section 110; and (2) by inserting before section 111 the following: ``SEC. 110B. LIMITATIONS ON JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS RELATING TO ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE. ``(a) Limitations on Claims.-- ``(1) In general.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law (except as provided in subparagraph (A) with respect to a shorter deadline), a claim challenging whether a final agency action relating to energy infrastructure complies with the requirements of this Act shall be barred unless-- ``(A) such claim is filed not later than 180 days after the final agency action is made public, unless a shorter deadline is specified under law; ``(B) in the case of a final agency action for which there was a public comment period on an environmental document, such claim-- ``(i) is filed by a party that submitted a substantive and unique comment during such public comment period by the noticed comment deadline for the environmental document and such comment was sufficiently detailed to put the applicable Federal agency on notice of the issue upon which the party seeks review; and ``(ii) concerns the same subject matter raised in the comment submitted during the public comment period; ``(C) such claim is filed by a party that has suffered or imminently will suffer direct harm from the final agency action; and ``(D) such claim does not challenge the establishment of a categorical exclusion. ``(2) Energy infrastructure defined.--In this subsection, the term `energy infrastructure' means a facility, and associated equipment, used for enabling the identification, leasing, development, production, processing, transportation, transmission, refining, and generation needed for energy. ``(b) Limitations on Remand.-- ``(1) In general.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no final agency action shall be vacated by a court, following a decision on the merits, unless the court determines that-- ``(A) the major Federal action for which the environmental document or final agency action is prepared will pose a significant risk of a proximate and substantial environmental harm; and ``(B) there is no other equitable remedy available as a matter of law. ``(2) Remand.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, if a court determines there are errors or deficiencies with an environmental document or final agency action that need to be corrected-- ``(A) the court may remand the environmental document to the applicable Federal agency with specific instruction to correct such errors or deficiencies within 180 days from the date on which the order of the court was issued to the applicable Federal agency; and ``(B) the major Federal action may be carried out pursuant to the final agency action notwithstanding the remand of the environmental document or final agency action under subparagraph (A), including during the time prescribed by the court to the Federal agency to correct such errors or deficiencies, so long as the court has not determined that vacatur is appropriate under paragraph (1). ``(c) No Effect on Review of Compliance With Other Deadlines.--This section shall not affect the right to obtain review under section 107(g)(3).''. SEC. 4. DEFERENCE TO AGENCIES IN JUDICIAL REVIEW. Section 111 of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4336e) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``(14) Reasonably foreseeable.--To comply with the requirements of this Act, the term `reasonably foreseeable', with respect to environmental effects of a proposed agency action, means effects that share a reasonably close causal relationship to, and are proximately caused by, the immediate project or action under consideration.''. <all>\n--- KONIEC DOKUMENTU ---\n\nPAMIĘTAJ: Twoja odpowiedź MUSI być wyłącznie poprawnym obiektem JSON. Nie dodawaj żadnych dodatkowych znaków, komentarzy ani tekstu przed znacznikiem '{' ani po znaczniku '}'. Cała odpowiedź musi być parsowalna jako JSON.\nNa podstawie POWYŻSZEGO dokumentu, wypełnij poniższą strukturę JSON:\nOto struktura JSON, której oczekuję (wypełnij ją treścią):\n{\n  \"pl_ai_title\": \"Nowy, krótki tytuł dla aktu prawnego po polsku, oddający sedno wprowadzanych zmian (np. maksymalnie 10-12 słów).\",\n  \"pl_summary\": \"2-3 zdania zwięzłego podsumowania treści aktu prawnego po polsku, napisane z perspektywy wpływu na życie codzienne obywateli.\",\n  \"pl_key_points\": [\n    \"Pierwszy krótki punkt po polsku dotyczący najważniejszych wprowadzanych rozwiązań lub zmian.\",\n    \"Drugi krótki punkt po polsku...\"\n  ],\n  \"eng_ai_title\": \"A new, short title for the legal act in English, capturing the essence of the changes (e.g., max 10-12 words).\",\n  \"eng_summary\": \"2-3 sentences summarizing the legal act in English, from the perspective of its impact on citizens' daily lives.\",\n  \"eng_key_points\": [\n    \"First short bullet point in English regarding the most important solutions or changes being introduced.\",\n    \"Second short bullet point in English...\"\n  ],\n  \"de_ai_title\": \"Ein neuer, kurzer Titel für das Rechtsdokument auf Deutsch, der den Kern der Änderungen erfasst (z.B. max. 10-12 Wörter).\",\n  \"de_summary\": \"2-3 Sätze Zusammenfassung des Rechtsdokuments auf Deutsch, aus der Perspektive seiner Auswirkungen auf das tägliche Leben der Bürger.\",\n  \"de_key_points\": [\n    \"Erster kurzer Stichpunkt auf Deutsch zu den wichtigsten eingeführten Lösungen oder Änderungen.\",\n    \"Zweiter kurzer Stichpunkt auf Deutsch...\"\n  ],\n  \"fr_ai_title\": \"Un nouveau titre court pour l'acte juridique en français, saisissant l'essence des changements (par exemple, 10-12 mots maximum).\",\n  \"fr_summary\": \"Résumé de 2-3 phrases de l'acte juridique en français, du point de vue de son impact sur la vie quotidienne des citoyens.\",\n  \"fr_key_points\": [\n    \"Premier court point en français concernant les solutions ou changements les plus importants introduits.\",\n    \"Deuxième court point en français...\"\n  ],\n  \"es_ai_title\": \"Un nuevo título breve para el acto jurídico en español, que recoja la esencia de los cambios (por ejemplo, máximo 10-12 palabras).\",\n  \"es_summary\": \"Resumen de 2-3 frases del acto jurídico en español, desde la perspectiva de su impacto en la vida cotidiana de los ciudadanos.\",\n  \"es_key_points\": [\n    \"Primer punto breve en español sobre las soluciones o cambios más importantes que se introducen.\",\n    \"Segundo punto breve en español...\"\n  ],\n  \"it_ai_title\": \"Un nuovo titolo breve per l'atto giuridico in italiano, che colga l'essenza delle modifiche (ad es. massimo 10-12 parole).\",\n  \"it_summary\": \"Riepilogo di 2-3 frasi dell'atto giuridico in italiano, dal punto di vista del suo impatto sulla vita quotidiana dei cittadini.\",\n  \"it_key_points\": [\n    \"Primo breve punto in italiano riguardante le soluzioni o le modifiche più importanti introdotte.\",\n    \"Secondo breve punto in italiano...\"\n  ],\n  \"nl_ai_title\": \"Een nieuwe, korte titel voor de rechtshandeling in het Nederlands, die de essentie van de wijzigingen weergeeft (bijv. max. 10-12 woorden).\",\n  \"nl_summary\": \"Samenvatting van 2-3 zinnen van de rechtshandeling in het Nederlands, vanuit het perspectief van de impact op het dagelijks leven van burgers.\",\n  \"nl_key_points\": [\n    \"Eerste korte punt in het Nederlands betreffende de belangrijkste geïntroduceerde oplossingen of wijzigingen.\",\n    \"Tweede korte punt in het Nederlands...\"\n  ],\n  \"pt_ai_title\": \"Um novo título curto para o ato jurídico em português, capturando a essência das mudanças (por exemplo, máx. 10-12 palavras).\",\n  \"pt_summary\": \"Resumo de 2-3 frases do ato jurídico em português, na perspetiva do seu impacto na vida quotidiana dos cidadãos.\",\n  \"pt_key_points\": [\n    \"Primeiro ponto curto em português sobre as soluções ou alterações mais importantes introduzidas.\",\n    \"Segundo ponto curto em português...\"\n  ],\n  \"category\": [\"Categorize the document into one category by default, based on the field it primarily concerns. Choose up to 3 if the document also touches upon SIGNIFICANT issues from other categories. You MUST select categories ONLY from the following list: Health, Education, Family, Taxes, Labor, Security, Environment, Courts and Law, Transport, Benefits, Real Estate, Media and Culture, Local Government, Migration, Agriculture, Public Investments, Informatization, Economy. If the document does not definitively fit any of these, you MUST use \"Other\". If you use \"Other\", it should be the ONLY category selected. Do NOT invent new categories. The response must be an array of strings, e.g., [\"Taxes\", \"Family\"].\"]\n}\n\n",
      "ai_response_raw": "{\n  \"pl_ai_title\": \"Ustawa o usprawnieniu przeglądów środowiskowych dla infrastruktury energetycznej\",\n  \"pl_summary\": \"Projekt ogranicza zakres analiz środowiskowych i wprowadza limity czasowe na zaskarżanie decyzji dotyczących inwestycji energetycznych. Ma to na celu przyspieszenie budowy infrastruktury przy jednoczesnym ograniczeniu możliwości blokowania projektów w sądach.\",\n  \"pl_key_points\": [\n    \"Skrócenie czasu na wniesienie pozwu przeciwko projektom energetycznym do 180 dni.\",\n    \"Ograniczenie analiz środowiskowych wyłącznie do bezpośrednich i bliskich skutków danej inwestycji.\",\n    \"Wymóg wcześniejszego zgłoszenia merytorycznych uwag w konsultacjach, aby móc później złożyć pozew.\",\n    \"Możliwość kontynuowania budowy nawet w przypadku stwierdzenia błędów w dokumentacji, o ile nie ma poważnego zagrożenia dla środowiska.\"\n  ],\n  \"eng_ai_title\": \"Making Reviews Certain Act: Streamlining Energy Infrastructure Approvals\",\n  \"eng_summary\": \"This bill limits environmental reviews to direct impacts and sets strict deadlines for legal challenges against energy projects. It aims to speed up energy infrastructure development by narrowing the grounds for lawsuits.\",\n  \"eng_key_points\": [\n    \"Sets a 180-day deadline to challenge final agency decisions on energy projects.\",\n    \"Requires agencies to only consider environmental effects directly caused by the specific project.\",\n    \"Limits the right to sue to parties who submitted detailed, unique comments during public review.\",\n    \"Allows projects to proceed during court-ordered document corrections unless there is a significant environmental risk.\"\n  ],\n  \"de_ai_title\": \"Gesetz zur Straffung der Umweltprüfungen für Energieinfrastruktur\",\n  \"de_summary\": \"Dieser Gesetzentwurf begrenzt den Umfang von Umweltprüfungen und setzt Fristen für Klagen gegen Energieprojekte. Ziel ist es, den Ausbau der Energieinfrastruktur durch weniger rechtliche Hürden zu beschleunigen.\",\n  \"de_key_points\": [\n    \"Einführung einer 180-Tage-Frist für Klagen gegen Entscheidungen zu Energieprojekten.\",\n    \"Umweltprüfungen müssen nur noch direkte und unmittelbar verursachte Auswirkungen berücksichtigen.\",\n    \"Nur Personen, die zuvor detaillierte Einwände eingereicht haben, sind klageberechtigt.\",\n    \"Bauprojekte können oft fortgesetzt werden, während Behörden Fehler in der Dokumentation korrigieren.\"\n  ],\n  \"fr_ai_title\": \"Loi visant à sécuriser les examens environnementaux des infrastructures énergétiques\",\n  \"fr_summary\": \"Ce projet de loi limite la portée des études environnementales et impose des délais pour contester les projets énergétiques en justice. Il vise à accélérer le développement des infrastructures en réduisant les recours juridiques.\",\n  \"fr_key_points\": [\n    \"Délai de 180 jours maximum pour contester une décision relative à une infrastructure énergétique.\",\n    \"Analyse limitée aux impacts environnementaux ayant un lien de causalité direct avec le projet.\",\n    \"Seules les parties ayant soumis des commentaires substantiels lors de l'enquête publique peuvent agir en justice.\",\n    \"Les travaux peuvent continuer pendant la correction des documents, sauf en cas de risque environnemental majeur.\"\n  ],\n  \"es_ai_title\": \"Ley para la Certeza en las Revisiones de Infraestructura Energética\",\n  \"es_summary\": \"Esta propuesta limita el alcance de las revisiones ambientales y establece plazos para impugnar proyectos de energía. Busca acelerar la construcción de infraestructura reduciendo las posibilidades de bloqueos judiciales.\",\n  \"es_key_points\": [\n    \"Establece un plazo de 180 días para presentar demandas contra proyectos de energía.\",\n    \"Las agencias solo deben evaluar efectos ambientales con una relación causal directa con el proyecto.\",\n    \"Solo podrán demandar quienes hayan presentado comentarios detallados y únicos durante el periodo de consulta.\",\n    \"Las obras pueden continuar mientras se corrigen errores técnicos, a menos que exista un riesgo ambiental grave.\"\n  ],\n  \"it_ai_title\": \"Legge per la certezza delle revisioni ambientali nelle infrastrutture energetiche\",\n  \"it_summary\": \"Questo disegno di legge limita l'ambito delle valutazioni ambientali e fissa scadenze per i ricorsi contro i progetti energetici. L'obiettivo è velocizzare la realizzazione delle infrastrutture riducendo i ritardi legali.\",\n  \"it_key_points\": [\n    \"Termine di 180 giorni per impugnare le decisioni finali sui progetti energetici.\",\n    \"Le agenzie devono considerare solo gli effetti ambientali direttamente causati dal progetto specifico.\",\n    \"Diritto di ricorso limitato a chi ha presentato osservazioni dettagliate durante la fase di consultazione.\",\n    \"I progetti possono proseguire durante la correzione di errori documentali, salvo gravi rischi ambientali.\"\n  ],\n  \"nl_ai_title\": \"Wet voor Zekerheid bij Milieutoetsingen van Energie-infrastructuur\",\n  \"nl_summary\": \"Dit wetsvoorstel beperkt de reikwijdte van milieuanalyses en stelt termijnen voor rechtszaken tegen energieprojecten. Het doel is om de bouw van energie-infrastructuur te versnellen door juridische hindernissen te verminderen.\",\n  \"nl_key_points\": [\n    \"Instelling van een termijn van 180 dagen voor het aanvechten van besluiten over energieprojecten.\",\n    \"Milieutoetsen hoeven alleen nog directe en nauw verbonden gevolgen van het project te analyseren.\",\n    \"Alleen partijen die tijdens de inspraakperiode unieke en inhoudelijke opmerkingen maakten, kunnen procederen.\",\n    \"Projecten mogen worden voortgezet terwijl de overheid fouten in de documentatie herstelt, tenzij er groot risico is.\"\n  ],\n  \"pt_ai_title\": \"Lei para a Certeza das Revisões de Infraestrutura Energética\",\n  \"pt_summary\": \"Este projeto de lei limita o alcance das avaliações ambientais e estabelece prazos para contestar projetos de energia. O objetivo é acelerar o desenvolvimento de infraestruturas, reduzindo os entraves judiciais.\",\n  \"pt_key_points\": [\n    \"Prazo de 180 dias para contestar judicialmente decisões sobre infraestruturas de energia.\",\n    \"As agências devem considerar apenas os efeitos ambientais com relação causal direta com o projeto.\",\n    \"Apenas partes que enviaram comentários detalhados durante a consulta pública podem iniciar processos.\",\n    \"As obras podem continuar durante a correção de falhas documentais, exceto se houver risco ambiental significativo.\"\n  ],\n  \"category\": [\"Environment\", \"Courts and Law\", \"Public Investments\"]\n}"
    }
  ]
}