{
  "legislationId": "119_HR_8306",
  "lastUpdate": "2026-04-21T11:31:07.432Z",
  "history": [
    {
      "timestamp": "2026-04-21T11:31:07.432Z",
      "source_url": "https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/hr8306/BILLS-119hr8306ih.htm",
      "model": "gemini-flash-lite-latest",
      "prompt_sent": "\nROLE: Fact Checker.\nZADANIE: Porównaj SOURCE (oryginał) i SUMMARY (streszczenie przygotowane przez inne AI).\n\nTwoim celem jest wykrycie \"ZMYŚLONYCH KONKRETÓW\" (Fabricated Entities) w SUMMARY.\n\nSOURCE:\n[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.R. 8306 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 8306 To require the Secretary of Commerce in coordination with the Director of National Intelligence to implement a process for establishing a rolling annual standard for the sale of certain integrated circuits to certain countries. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 15, 2026 Mr. Moolenaar introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To require the Secretary of Commerce in coordination with the Director of National Intelligence to implement a process for establishing a rolling annual standard for the sale of certain integrated circuits to certain countries. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Semiconductor Controls Adjusted to Limit Exports Act'' or the ``SCALE Act''. SEC. 2. STATEMENT OF POLICY. It is the policy of the United States to-- (1) lead in global diffusion of artificial intelligence (AI) hardware and software; (2) shape international markets so that foreign adversaries remain reliant on United States and allied supply chains for AI hardware and software; (3) pursue export promotion and export control agendas that enable the diffusion of United States AI hardware and software and enduring United States leadership in advanced artificial intelligence; (4) ensure that the United States and its allies consistently apply export restrictions to ensure national security objectives and prevent backfill amongst allied and partner nations; (5) limit the ability of adversaries to indigenize their own AI hardware production efforts, such limitation to include by crowding out their domestic markets with United States AI hardware; (6) provide business stability in export controls through a systematic and repeatable process that annually assesses that indigenous capability of an entity of concern to produce AI hardware and set export control thresholds to an entity of concern based on that process; and (7) prevent any foreign adversary from accumulating, through any combination of indigenous production, import, or third-party access, a quantity of AI hardware that approaches parity with the aggregate AI hardware capacity of the United States. SEC. 3. EXPORT PROMOTION AND CONTROL POLICY. (a) Performance Metrics.-- (1) Establishment.--Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary and the Director, in coordination with other departments and agencies as necessary, shall establish and publicly release objective performance metrics that measure the state of AI hardware in entities of concern. The Secretary shall submit a classified annex to the appropriate congressional committees containing any information that the Secretary determines cannot be publicly released. (2) Objectives.--The metrics shall assess-- (A) the capability of individual AI hardware items indigenously produced by each entity of concern; (B) the aggregate capability of all entities of concern to indigenously produce AI hardware items relative to the total demand for AI hardware of all entities of concern who purchase AI hardware; and (C) the aggregate estimated amount of AI hardware located within all countries of concern or owned or controlled by an entity of concern. (3) Inclusion of specific metrics.--Such metrics shall include, but are not limited to, individual chip capabilities, or where applicable aggregated, in the following categories: (A) Total processing power. (B) Interconnect bandwidth. (C) Memory capacity bandwidth. (b) Assessment and Report.-- (1) In general.--Not later than 90 days after each update to the metrics established under subsection (a), the Secretary and the Director, in coordination with other departments and agencies as such Secretary and Director determine necessary, shall submit a report to the appropriate congressional committees assessing the quantity and quality of AI hardware produced in each country of concern using such metrics. (2) Contents.--The assessment required under paragraph (1) shall include-- (A) for each metric, the aggregate estimated amount of AI hardware, broken down by quarter, installed in each country of concern, delineated by AI hardware produced by AI hardware designers that are an entity of concern and AI hardware produced outside of a country of concern and imported into a country of concern; (B) for each metric, the aggregate estimated amount of AI hardware installed outside of a country of concern and owned or controlled by any entity of concern; (C) for each metric, the aggregate estimated amount of AI hardware-- (i) legally available to an entity of concern through remote access; (ii) installed outside of a country of concern; and (iii) not owned or controlled by an entity of concern; (D) a breakdown of subparagraph (B) in terms of the country of origin of the AI hardware designer (with respect to this subparagraph, the country of origin of a unit of AI hardware shall be considered to be the country in which the designer of that unit of AI hardware is domiciled); (E) for each metric, the combined total of the hardware identified in subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), expressed as a percentage of the aggregate amount of AI hardware physically present in and intended for use within the United States; (F) a breakdown by country of origin of the aggregate amount of AI hardware physically present in and intended for use within the United States. For this purpose, the country of origin of a unit of AI hardware shall be considered to be the country in which the designer of that unit of AI hardware is domiciled; and (G) a technical assessment of the capability of the most advanced AI hardware designed by an entity of concern as compared to the state-of-the-art for that hardware. (c) AI Export Control Threshold.--The Secretary shall adopt an export control policy for AI hardware, including such a policy for remote access of such hardware, to any entity of concern in accordance with the following: (1) Not later than 365 days after the date of enactment of this Act, and not less than annually thereafter, use the findings from the assessment in subsection (b), to set an upper limit for the export of AI hardware to an entity of concern expressed in terms of the metrics developed in subsection (a) as follows: (A) The upper limit shall be implemented as a policy of denial for license applications to export, reexport, transfer (in-country), or provide remote access to AI hardware. (B) The upper limit for any individual item of AI hardware shall be set at a level not to exceed 110 percent of the performance, as measured by the metrics developed under subsection (a), of the most capable AI hardware item that meets the indigenous production threshold established under subparagraph (C). (C) An individual item of AI hardware produced by an entity of concern shall be considered in establishing the upper limit under subparagraph (B) only if such item is manufactured in sustained serial production at a volume sufficient to fulfill not less than 25 percent of the estimated annual aggregate demand for AI hardware among all entities of concern, as assessed by the Secretary using the most recent assessment under subsection (b). AI hardware produced solely in experimental, prototype, or limited demonstration quantities shall not be considered for purposes of establishing the upper limit. (D) If, at the time of any assessment under subsection (b), no individual item of AI hardware produced by an entity of concern meets the production threshold established under subparagraph (C), then applications for the export of or provision of remote access to AI hardware to any entity of concern shall be reviewed under a policy of denial. (E) In no case shall the upper limit established under this paragraph be lower than the upper limit in effect during the preceding assessment period, unless the Secretary provides a written determination to the appropriate congressional committees that a reduction is necessary to address a specific and identified national security threat. (2) For each metric established under subsection (a), the Secretary shall require a license for any export, reexport, transfer (in-country), or provide remote access to, AI hardware to any entity of concern, and shall review licenses under a presumption of denial if the approval of such license would cause the aggregate estimated amount of adversary AI hardware to exceed, in the aggregate, 5 percent of the aggregate estimated amount of AI hardware physically present in and intended for use within the United States. (d) Authority To Update Metrics.--On and after the date that is 24 months after the date on which the first assessment under subsection (b) is submitted, the Secretary may add, modify, or remove the metrics established under subsection (a), subject to the following: (1) The Secretary shall provide written notice to the appropriate congressional committees not less than 90 days before any such addition, modification, or removal takes effect, including a detailed justification for each proposed change and an assessment of how such change would affect the export control thresholds established under subsection (d). (2) No modification or removal of a metric under this subsection shall take effect if, within the 90-day notice period under paragraph (1), either the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives or the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate submits to the Secretary a written objection stating that the proposed change would undermine the purposes of this Act. (e) Conditions for License Review on Other Than a Presumption of Denial Basis.--Any license application to export AI hardware to any entity of concern reviewed under the upper limit established under subsection (d)(1) on other than a presumption of denial basis shall include certification by the applicant that-- (1) the license will not result in any delay in fulfilling existing or new orders from customers in the United States for end use in the United States for any advanced-node integrated circuits produced by the applicant, taking into account normal lead times, and that global foundry capacity that would otherwise be used to produce similar or more advanced integrated circuits for end users in the United States will not be diverted to produce items authorized by the license; (2) for the AI hardware described in the license application, the aggregate total processing performance of such hardware exported to any entity of concern does not exceed 50 percent of the aggregate total processing performance of the same hardware shipped to customers in the United States for end use in the United States; (3) the items are not destined for military end use, military-intelligence end use, or weapons of mass destruction end use, and that the ultimate consignee will employ know-your- customer procedures to screen and prevent unauthorized remote access by prohibited parties; (4) prior to export, every shipment of AI hardware described in the license application will be reviewed by a qualified independent third-party testing laboratory headquartered in the United States, not under the control of any entity of concern, and having no financial interest in any party to the transaction, to confirm that the technical capabilities of the items are consistent with the representations in the license application; and (5) if the ultimate consignee or end user provides infrastructure-as-a-service, the consignee or end user will not transfer model weights trained on the exported AI hardware to any end user not disclosed in the license application, and will not provide any prohibited party with remote access to any model trained on such hardware. SEC. 4. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION. Nothing in this Act may be construed to direct the Secretary to-- (1) decontrol or reduce export control thresholds based on assessment findings; or (2) approve licenses for sales of AI hardware or software. SEC. 5. DEFINITIONS. In this Act: (1) AI hardware.--The term ``AI hardware'' means-- (A) any integrated circuit, computer, electronic assembly, or other item classified under Export Control Classification Numbers 3A090, 4A090, or any related Export Control Classification Number designated with a ``.z'' suffix under the Commerce Control List (supplement number 1 to part 774 of title 15, Code of Federal Regulations (or a successor regulation)); and (B) any other item designated by the Secretary, by regulation, as AI hardware for the purposes of this Act. (2) Aggregate estimated amount of ai hardware.--The term ``aggregate estimated amount of AI hardware'' means the total quantity of AI hardware, as measured using the metrics established by the Secretary under section 3(a). (3) Aggregate estimated amount of adversary ai hardware.-- The term ``aggregate estimated amount of adversary AI hardware'' means the aggregate estimated amount of AI hardware-- (A) installed across all countries of concern; or (B) accessible to any entity of concern, including through remote access to AI hardware installed outside of any country of concern. (4) Appropriate congressional committees.--The term ``appropriate congressional committees'' means-- (A) the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives; (B) the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives; (C) the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate; and (D) the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate. (5) Country of concern.--The term ``country of concern'' means-- (A) the People's Republic of China, including the Hong Kong and Macau Special Administrative Regions; (B) the Republic of Cuba; (C) the Islamic Republic of Iran; (D) the Democratic People's Republic of Korea; (E) the Russian Federation; and (F) any other foreign country-- (i) listed in the Country Group D:5 under Supplement No. 1 to part 740 of the Export Administration Regulations, as published on January 1, 2026; (ii) designated by the Secretary of State as a country of concern for purposes of this section; and (iii) notice of such designation has been published in the Federal Register. (6) Director.--The term ``Director'' means the Director of National Intelligence. (7) Entity of concern.--The term ``entity of concern'' means any entity-- (A) organized under the laws of any country of concern; (B) having its principal place of business in any country of concern; (C) of which more than 10 percent of the ultimate beneficial ownership is held, directly or indirectly, by one or more persons or entities that are organized under the laws of, have their principal place of business in, or are nationals of any country of concern; or (D) that is owned or controlled by, or acts on behalf of, the government of any country of concern. (8) Indigenous production.--The term ``indigenous production'', with respect to AI hardware-- (A) means AI hardware that is-- (i) physically fabricated within the territory of the People's Republic of China; and (ii) designed by any entity of concern; and (B) excludes AI hardware that is designed by any entity of concern but fabricated outside of any country of concern for purposes of this Act. (9) Remote access.--The term ``remote access'' means access on a purposeful, knowing, reckless, or negligent basis to an item subject to the jurisdiction of the United States under this Act by a foreign person through a network connection, including the internet or a cloud computing service, from a location other than where the item is physically located if the Secretary determines that the use of the item could pose a serious risk to the national security or foreign policy of the United States. (10) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of Commerce. <all>\n\nSUMMARY TO EVALUATE:\nTitle: SCALE Act: New Rules for Exporting AI Chips to High-Risk Countries\nSummary: This bill establishes strict controls on the sale of advanced AI hardware to countries like China and Russia to protect national security. It ensures that foreign adversaries do not gain technological parity with the United States in the field of artificial intelligence.\nKey Points: Sets annual export limits based on the indigenous production capabilities of countries of concern., Requires special licenses for exporting AI hardware and providing remote access via cloud services., Prioritizes fulfilling orders for U.S. customers before exporting advanced technology to restricted entities., Mandates independent third-party testing of hardware to verify technical capabilities before shipment., Restricts high-risk entities from using exported hardware to train advanced AI models.\n\nZASADY OCENY:\n1. Sprawdź wszystkie LICZBY, DATY i KWOTY w SUMMARY. Jeśli którejś brakuje w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n2. Sprawdź wszystkie NAZWISKA, ORGANIZACJE i MIEJSCA w SUMMARY. Jeśli którejś brakuje w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n3. Sprawdź wszystkie konkretne DZIAŁANIA PRAWNE . Jeśli tego mechanizmu nie ma w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n\nWAŻNE: Abstrakcyjne pojęcia (np. \"transparentność\", \"zaufanie\") są dozwolone jako wnioski.\n\nOUTPUT (JSON):\n{\n  \"is_valid\": true/false,\n  \"issue\": \"fabricated_entity\" / \"contradiction\" / \"none\"\n}\n\nWYMAGANIA FORMATOWANIA:\n1. Odpowiedz WYŁĄCZNIE surowym obiektem JSON.\n2. NIE używaj bloków kodu Markdown.\n3. NIE dodawaj żadnych wstępów ani wyjaśnień przed ani po JSONie.\n4. JSON musi być poprawny i gotowy do parsowania.\n\n",
      "ai_response_raw": "{\n  \"is_valid\": true,\n  \"issue\": \"none\"\n}"
    },
    {
      "timestamp": "2026-04-21T11:17:47.549Z",
      "source_url": "https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/hr8306/BILLS-119hr8306ih.htm",
      "model": "gemini-flash-latest",
      "prompt_sent": "\nJesteś ekspertem od prawa Stanów Zjednoczonych, który ma za zadanie analizować dokumenty ustaw, uchwał oraz innych dokumentów legislacyjnych, a następnie przygotowywać z nich informacje w przystępny sposób dla obywateli. Twoim celem jest przedstawienie informacji tak, aby obywatele mogli sami ocenić wpływ legislacji na ich życie, nawet bez posiadania specjalistycznej wiedzy legislacyjnej. Skup się na faktach i obiektywnych skutkach wprowadzanych zmian, unikając wartościowania i osobistych opinii. Wszelki żargon prawny jest zabroniony. Prezentuj informacje w jasny, zwięzły i angażujący sposób, tak aby były zrozumiałe dla osoby bez wykształcenia prawniczego. Unikaj długich, złożonych zdań. Zamiast pisać \"projekt ma na celu nowelizację kodeksu podatkowego...\", napisz \"Zmiany w podatkach: nowe ulgi i obowiązki dla...\". Kontynuuj swoją pracę, dopóki nie rozwiążesz swojego zadania. Jeśli nie masz pewności co do generowanej treści, przeanalizuj dokument ponownie – nie zgaduj. Rozplanuj dobrze swoje zadanie przed przystąpieniem do niego. W podsumowaniu i kluczowych punktach, jeśli to możliwe i uzasadnione, podkreśl, jakie konkretne korzyści lub skutki (pozytywne lub negatywne) wprowadza ustawa dla życia codziennego obywateli, ich praw i obowiązków, finansów osobistych, bezpieczeństwa i innych ważnych kwestii (np. kategorycznych zakazów i nakazów czy najważniejszych konkretnych alokacji finansowych i terytorialnych).\n\nTwoja odpowiedź MUSI być w formacie JSON - i zawierać następujące klucze.\nZanim zwrócisz odpowiedź, dokładnie zweryfikuj, czy cała struktura JSON jest w 100% poprawna, włącznie ze wszystkimi przecinkami, nawiasami klamrowymi, kwadratowymi oraz cudzysłowami. Błędny JSON jest nieakceptowalny i uniemożliwi przetworzenie Twojej pracy.\n\nPrzeanalizuj dokładnie poniższy tekst dokumentu prawnego. To jest treść, na podstawie której masz wygenerować podsumowanie i kluczowe punkty:\n--- POCZĄTEK DOKUMENTU ---\n[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.R. 8306 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 8306 To require the Secretary of Commerce in coordination with the Director of National Intelligence to implement a process for establishing a rolling annual standard for the sale of certain integrated circuits to certain countries. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 15, 2026 Mr. Moolenaar introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To require the Secretary of Commerce in coordination with the Director of National Intelligence to implement a process for establishing a rolling annual standard for the sale of certain integrated circuits to certain countries. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Semiconductor Controls Adjusted to Limit Exports Act'' or the ``SCALE Act''. SEC. 2. STATEMENT OF POLICY. It is the policy of the United States to-- (1) lead in global diffusion of artificial intelligence (AI) hardware and software; (2) shape international markets so that foreign adversaries remain reliant on United States and allied supply chains for AI hardware and software; (3) pursue export promotion and export control agendas that enable the diffusion of United States AI hardware and software and enduring United States leadership in advanced artificial intelligence; (4) ensure that the United States and its allies consistently apply export restrictions to ensure national security objectives and prevent backfill amongst allied and partner nations; (5) limit the ability of adversaries to indigenize their own AI hardware production efforts, such limitation to include by crowding out their domestic markets with United States AI hardware; (6) provide business stability in export controls through a systematic and repeatable process that annually assesses that indigenous capability of an entity of concern to produce AI hardware and set export control thresholds to an entity of concern based on that process; and (7) prevent any foreign adversary from accumulating, through any combination of indigenous production, import, or third-party access, a quantity of AI hardware that approaches parity with the aggregate AI hardware capacity of the United States. SEC. 3. EXPORT PROMOTION AND CONTROL POLICY. (a) Performance Metrics.-- (1) Establishment.--Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary and the Director, in coordination with other departments and agencies as necessary, shall establish and publicly release objective performance metrics that measure the state of AI hardware in entities of concern. The Secretary shall submit a classified annex to the appropriate congressional committees containing any information that the Secretary determines cannot be publicly released. (2) Objectives.--The metrics shall assess-- (A) the capability of individual AI hardware items indigenously produced by each entity of concern; (B) the aggregate capability of all entities of concern to indigenously produce AI hardware items relative to the total demand for AI hardware of all entities of concern who purchase AI hardware; and (C) the aggregate estimated amount of AI hardware located within all countries of concern or owned or controlled by an entity of concern. (3) Inclusion of specific metrics.--Such metrics shall include, but are not limited to, individual chip capabilities, or where applicable aggregated, in the following categories: (A) Total processing power. (B) Interconnect bandwidth. (C) Memory capacity bandwidth. (b) Assessment and Report.-- (1) In general.--Not later than 90 days after each update to the metrics established under subsection (a), the Secretary and the Director, in coordination with other departments and agencies as such Secretary and Director determine necessary, shall submit a report to the appropriate congressional committees assessing the quantity and quality of AI hardware produced in each country of concern using such metrics. (2) Contents.--The assessment required under paragraph (1) shall include-- (A) for each metric, the aggregate estimated amount of AI hardware, broken down by quarter, installed in each country of concern, delineated by AI hardware produced by AI hardware designers that are an entity of concern and AI hardware produced outside of a country of concern and imported into a country of concern; (B) for each metric, the aggregate estimated amount of AI hardware installed outside of a country of concern and owned or controlled by any entity of concern; (C) for each metric, the aggregate estimated amount of AI hardware-- (i) legally available to an entity of concern through remote access; (ii) installed outside of a country of concern; and (iii) not owned or controlled by an entity of concern; (D) a breakdown of subparagraph (B) in terms of the country of origin of the AI hardware designer (with respect to this subparagraph, the country of origin of a unit of AI hardware shall be considered to be the country in which the designer of that unit of AI hardware is domiciled); (E) for each metric, the combined total of the hardware identified in subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), expressed as a percentage of the aggregate amount of AI hardware physically present in and intended for use within the United States; (F) a breakdown by country of origin of the aggregate amount of AI hardware physically present in and intended for use within the United States. For this purpose, the country of origin of a unit of AI hardware shall be considered to be the country in which the designer of that unit of AI hardware is domiciled; and (G) a technical assessment of the capability of the most advanced AI hardware designed by an entity of concern as compared to the state-of-the-art for that hardware. (c) AI Export Control Threshold.--The Secretary shall adopt an export control policy for AI hardware, including such a policy for remote access of such hardware, to any entity of concern in accordance with the following: (1) Not later than 365 days after the date of enactment of this Act, and not less than annually thereafter, use the findings from the assessment in subsection (b), to set an upper limit for the export of AI hardware to an entity of concern expressed in terms of the metrics developed in subsection (a) as follows: (A) The upper limit shall be implemented as a policy of denial for license applications to export, reexport, transfer (in-country), or provide remote access to AI hardware. (B) The upper limit for any individual item of AI hardware shall be set at a level not to exceed 110 percent of the performance, as measured by the metrics developed under subsection (a), of the most capable AI hardware item that meets the indigenous production threshold established under subparagraph (C). (C) An individual item of AI hardware produced by an entity of concern shall be considered in establishing the upper limit under subparagraph (B) only if such item is manufactured in sustained serial production at a volume sufficient to fulfill not less than 25 percent of the estimated annual aggregate demand for AI hardware among all entities of concern, as assessed by the Secretary using the most recent assessment under subsection (b). AI hardware produced solely in experimental, prototype, or limited demonstration quantities shall not be considered for purposes of establishing the upper limit. (D) If, at the time of any assessment under subsection (b), no individual item of AI hardware produced by an entity of concern meets the production threshold established under subparagraph (C), then applications for the export of or provision of remote access to AI hardware to any entity of concern shall be reviewed under a policy of denial. (E) In no case shall the upper limit established under this paragraph be lower than the upper limit in effect during the preceding assessment period, unless the Secretary provides a written determination to the appropriate congressional committees that a reduction is necessary to address a specific and identified national security threat. (2) For each metric established under subsection (a), the Secretary shall require a license for any export, reexport, transfer (in-country), or provide remote access to, AI hardware to any entity of concern, and shall review licenses under a presumption of denial if the approval of such license would cause the aggregate estimated amount of adversary AI hardware to exceed, in the aggregate, 5 percent of the aggregate estimated amount of AI hardware physically present in and intended for use within the United States. (d) Authority To Update Metrics.--On and after the date that is 24 months after the date on which the first assessment under subsection (b) is submitted, the Secretary may add, modify, or remove the metrics established under subsection (a), subject to the following: (1) The Secretary shall provide written notice to the appropriate congressional committees not less than 90 days before any such addition, modification, or removal takes effect, including a detailed justification for each proposed change and an assessment of how such change would affect the export control thresholds established under subsection (d). (2) No modification or removal of a metric under this subsection shall take effect if, within the 90-day notice period under paragraph (1), either the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives or the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate submits to the Secretary a written objection stating that the proposed change would undermine the purposes of this Act. (e) Conditions for License Review on Other Than a Presumption of Denial Basis.--Any license application to export AI hardware to any entity of concern reviewed under the upper limit established under subsection (d)(1) on other than a presumption of denial basis shall include certification by the applicant that-- (1) the license will not result in any delay in fulfilling existing or new orders from customers in the United States for end use in the United States for any advanced-node integrated circuits produced by the applicant, taking into account normal lead times, and that global foundry capacity that would otherwise be used to produce similar or more advanced integrated circuits for end users in the United States will not be diverted to produce items authorized by the license; (2) for the AI hardware described in the license application, the aggregate total processing performance of such hardware exported to any entity of concern does not exceed 50 percent of the aggregate total processing performance of the same hardware shipped to customers in the United States for end use in the United States; (3) the items are not destined for military end use, military-intelligence end use, or weapons of mass destruction end use, and that the ultimate consignee will employ know-your- customer procedures to screen and prevent unauthorized remote access by prohibited parties; (4) prior to export, every shipment of AI hardware described in the license application will be reviewed by a qualified independent third-party testing laboratory headquartered in the United States, not under the control of any entity of concern, and having no financial interest in any party to the transaction, to confirm that the technical capabilities of the items are consistent with the representations in the license application; and (5) if the ultimate consignee or end user provides infrastructure-as-a-service, the consignee or end user will not transfer model weights trained on the exported AI hardware to any end user not disclosed in the license application, and will not provide any prohibited party with remote access to any model trained on such hardware. SEC. 4. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION. Nothing in this Act may be construed to direct the Secretary to-- (1) decontrol or reduce export control thresholds based on assessment findings; or (2) approve licenses for sales of AI hardware or software. SEC. 5. DEFINITIONS. In this Act: (1) AI hardware.--The term ``AI hardware'' means-- (A) any integrated circuit, computer, electronic assembly, or other item classified under Export Control Classification Numbers 3A090, 4A090, or any related Export Control Classification Number designated with a ``.z'' suffix under the Commerce Control List (supplement number 1 to part 774 of title 15, Code of Federal Regulations (or a successor regulation)); and (B) any other item designated by the Secretary, by regulation, as AI hardware for the purposes of this Act. (2) Aggregate estimated amount of ai hardware.--The term ``aggregate estimated amount of AI hardware'' means the total quantity of AI hardware, as measured using the metrics established by the Secretary under section 3(a). (3) Aggregate estimated amount of adversary ai hardware.-- The term ``aggregate estimated amount of adversary AI hardware'' means the aggregate estimated amount of AI hardware-- (A) installed across all countries of concern; or (B) accessible to any entity of concern, including through remote access to AI hardware installed outside of any country of concern. (4) Appropriate congressional committees.--The term ``appropriate congressional committees'' means-- (A) the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives; (B) the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives; (C) the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate; and (D) the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate. (5) Country of concern.--The term ``country of concern'' means-- (A) the People's Republic of China, including the Hong Kong and Macau Special Administrative Regions; (B) the Republic of Cuba; (C) the Islamic Republic of Iran; (D) the Democratic People's Republic of Korea; (E) the Russian Federation; and (F) any other foreign country-- (i) listed in the Country Group D:5 under Supplement No. 1 to part 740 of the Export Administration Regulations, as published on January 1, 2026; (ii) designated by the Secretary of State as a country of concern for purposes of this section; and (iii) notice of such designation has been published in the Federal Register. (6) Director.--The term ``Director'' means the Director of National Intelligence. (7) Entity of concern.--The term ``entity of concern'' means any entity-- (A) organized under the laws of any country of concern; (B) having its principal place of business in any country of concern; (C) of which more than 10 percent of the ultimate beneficial ownership is held, directly or indirectly, by one or more persons or entities that are organized under the laws of, have their principal place of business in, or are nationals of any country of concern; or (D) that is owned or controlled by, or acts on behalf of, the government of any country of concern. (8) Indigenous production.--The term ``indigenous production'', with respect to AI hardware-- (A) means AI hardware that is-- (i) physically fabricated within the territory of the People's Republic of China; and (ii) designed by any entity of concern; and (B) excludes AI hardware that is designed by any entity of concern but fabricated outside of any country of concern for purposes of this Act. (9) Remote access.--The term ``remote access'' means access on a purposeful, knowing, reckless, or negligent basis to an item subject to the jurisdiction of the United States under this Act by a foreign person through a network connection, including the internet or a cloud computing service, from a location other than where the item is physically located if the Secretary determines that the use of the item could pose a serious risk to the national security or foreign policy of the United States. (10) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of Commerce. <all>\n--- KONIEC DOKUMENTU ---\n\nPAMIĘTAJ: Twoja odpowiedź MUSI być wyłącznie poprawnym obiektem JSON. Nie dodawaj żadnych dodatkowych znaków, komentarzy ani tekstu przed znacznikiem '{' ani po znaczniku '}'. Cała odpowiedź musi być parsowalna jako JSON.\nNa podstawie POWYŻSZEGO dokumentu, wypełnij poniższą strukturę JSON:\nOto struktura JSON, której oczekuję (wypełnij ją treścią):\n{\n  \"pl_ai_title\": \"Nowy, krótki tytuł dla aktu prawnego po polsku, oddający sedno wprowadzanych zmian (np. maksymalnie 10-12 słów).\",\n  \"pl_summary\": \"2-3 zdania zwięzłego podsumowania treści aktu prawnego po polsku, napisane z perspektywy wpływu na życie codzienne obywateli.\",\n  \"pl_key_points\": [\n    \"Pierwszy krótki punkt po polsku dotyczący najważniejszych wprowadzanych rozwiązań lub zmian.\",\n    \"Drugi krótki punkt po polsku...\"\n  ],\n  \"eng_ai_title\": \"A new, short title for the legal act in English, capturing the essence of the changes (e.g., max 10-12 words).\",\n  \"eng_summary\": \"2-3 sentences summarizing the legal act in English, from the perspective of its impact on citizens' daily lives.\",\n  \"eng_key_points\": [\n    \"First short bullet point in English regarding the most important solutions or changes being introduced.\",\n    \"Second short bullet point in English...\"\n  ],\n  \"de_ai_title\": \"Ein neuer, kurzer Titel für das Rechtsdokument auf Deutsch, der den Kern der Änderungen erfasst (z.B. max. 10-12 Wörter).\",\n  \"de_summary\": \"2-3 Sätze Zusammenfassung des Rechtsdokuments auf Deutsch, aus der Perspektive seiner Auswirkungen auf das tägliche Leben der Bürger.\",\n  \"de_key_points\": [\n    \"Erster kurzer Stichpunkt auf Deutsch zu den wichtigsten eingeführten Lösungen oder Änderungen.\",\n    \"Zweiter kurzer Stichpunkt auf Deutsch...\"\n  ],\n  \"fr_ai_title\": \"Un nouveau titre court pour l'acte juridique en français, saisissant l'essence des changements (par exemple, 10-12 mots maximum).\",\n  \"fr_summary\": \"Résumé de 2-3 phrases de l'acte juridique en français, du point de vue de son impact sur la vie quotidienne des citoyens.\",\n  \"fr_key_points\": [\n    \"Premier court point en français concernant les solutions ou changements les plus importants introduits.\",\n    \"Deuxième court point en français...\"\n  ],\n  \"es_ai_title\": \"Un nuevo título breve para el acto jurídico en español, que recoja la esencia de los cambios (por ejemplo, máximo 10-12 palabras).\",\n  \"es_summary\": \"Resumen de 2-3 frases del acto jurídico en español, desde la perspectiva de su impacto en la vida cotidiana de los ciudadanos.\",\n  \"es_key_points\": [\n    \"Primer punto breve en español sobre las soluciones o cambios más importantes que se introducen.\",\n    \"Segundo punto breve en español...\"\n  ],\n  \"it_ai_title\": \"Un nuovo titolo breve per l'atto giuridico in italiano, che colga l'essenza delle modifiche (ad es. massimo 10-12 parole).\",\n  \"it_summary\": \"Riepilogo di 2-3 frasi dell'atto giuridico in italiano, dal punto di vista del suo impatto sulla vita quotidiana dei cittadini.\",\n  \"it_key_points\": [\n    \"Primo breve punto in italiano riguardante le soluzioni o le modifiche più importanti introdotte.\",\n    \"Secondo breve punto in italiano...\"\n  ],\n  \"nl_ai_title\": \"Een nieuwe, korte titel voor de rechtshandeling in het Nederlands, die de essentie van de wijzigingen weergeeft (bijv. max. 10-12 woorden).\",\n  \"nl_summary\": \"Samenvatting van 2-3 zinnen van de rechtshandeling in het Nederlands, vanuit het perspectief van de impact op het dagelijks leven van burgers.\",\n  \"nl_key_points\": [\n    \"Eerste korte punt in het Nederlands betreffende de belangrijkste geïntroduceerde oplossingen of wijzigingen.\",\n    \"Tweede korte punt in het Nederlands...\"\n  ],\n  \"pt_ai_title\": \"Um novo título curto para o ato jurídico em português, capturando a essência das mudanças (por exemplo, máx. 10-12 palavras).\",\n  \"pt_summary\": \"Resumo de 2-3 frases do ato jurídico em português, na perspetiva do seu impacto na vida quotidiana dos cidadãos.\",\n  \"pt_key_points\": [\n    \"Primeiro ponto curto em português sobre as soluções ou alterações mais importantes introduzidas.\",\n    \"Segundo ponto curto em português...\"\n  ],\n  \"category\": [\"Categorize the document into one category by default, based on the field it primarily concerns. Choose up to 3 if the document also touches upon SIGNIFICANT issues from other categories. You MUST select categories ONLY from the following list: Health, Education, Family, Taxes, Labor, Security, Environment, Courts and Law, Transport, Benefits, Real Estate, Media and Culture, Local Government, Migration, Agriculture, Public Investments, Informatization, Economy. If the document does not definitively fit any of these, you MUST use \"Other\". If you use \"Other\", it should be the ONLY category selected. Do NOT invent new categories. The response must be an array of strings, e.g., [\"Taxes\", \"Family\"].\"]\n}\n\n",
      "ai_response_raw": "{\n  \"pl_ai_title\": \"Ustawa SCALE: Nowe zasady eksportu procesorów AI do krajów wysokiego ryzyka\",\n  \"pl_summary\": \"Ustawa wprowadza ścisłą kontrolę nad sprzedażą zaawansowanych czipów do sztucznej inteligencji krajom takim jak Chiny czy Rosja. Celem jest ochrona bezpieczeństwa narodowego poprzez ograniczenie dostępu przeciwników do technologii, która mogłaby zagrozić przewadze technologicznej USA.\",\n  \"pl_key_points\": [\n    \"Wprowadzenie corocznych limitów na sprzedaż czipów AI w oparciu o to, co dane państwo potrafi samo wyprodukować.\",\n    \"Obowiązek uzyskania specjalnych licencji na eksport technologii oraz na zdalny dostęp do niej, na przykład przez chmurę.\",\n    \"Pierwszeństwo w dostawach dla amerykańskich odbiorców przed klientami z krajów objętych ograniczeniami.\",\n    \"Wymóg niezależnych testów sprzętu przed wysyłką, aby upewnić się, że spełnia on normy bezpieczeństwa.\",\n    \"Ograniczenie możliwości szkolenia modeli sztucznej inteligencji przez podmioty z krajów wysokiego ryzyka.\"\n  ],\n  \"eng_ai_title\": \"SCALE Act: New Rules for Exporting AI Chips to High-Risk Countries\",\n  \"eng_summary\": \"This bill establishes strict controls on the sale of advanced AI hardware to countries like China and Russia to protect national security. It ensures that foreign adversaries do not gain technological parity with the United States in the field of artificial intelligence.\",\n  \"eng_key_points\": [\n    \"Sets annual export limits based on the indigenous production capabilities of countries of concern.\",\n    \"Requires special licenses for exporting AI hardware and providing remote access via cloud services.\",\n    \"Prioritizes fulfilling orders for U.S. customers before exporting advanced technology to restricted entities.\",\n    \"Mandates independent third-party testing of hardware to verify technical capabilities before shipment.\",\n    \"Restricts high-risk entities from using exported hardware to train advanced AI models.\"\n  ],\n  \"de_ai_title\": \"SCALE Act: Neue Exportregeln für KI-Chips in Hochrisikoländer\",\n  \"de_summary\": \"Dieses Gesetz führt strenge Kontrollen für den Verkauf fortschrittlicher KI-Hardware an Länder wie China und Russland ein. Ziel ist es, die nationale Sicherheit zu schützen und den technologischen Vorsprung der USA im Bereich der künstlichen Intelligenz zu wahren.\",\n  \"de_key_points\": [\n    \"Jährliche Exportlimits basierend auf der eigenen Produktionsfähigkeit der betroffenen Länder.\",\n    \"Lizenzpflicht für den Export von KI-Hardware und den Fernzugriff über Cloud-Dienste.\",\n    \"Vorrang für US-Kunden bei der Lieferung von Halbleitern vor Exporten an eingeschränkte Unternehmen.\",\n    \"Verpflichtende unabhängige Tests der Hardware vor dem Versand zur Überprüfung der technischen Daten.\",\n    \"Einschränkung der Möglichkeiten für Unternehmen aus Risikoländern, KI-Modelle mit exportierter Hardware zu trainieren.\"\n  ],\n  \"fr_ai_title\": \"Loi SCALE : Nouvelles règles d'exportation de puces IA vers les pays à risque\",\n  \"fr_summary\": \"Cette loi instaure des contrôles stricts sur la vente de matériel d'intelligence artificielle avancé à des pays comme la Chine et la Russie. L'objectif est de protéger la sécurité nationale en limitant l'accès des adversaires aux technologies critiques.\",\n  \"fr_key_points\": [\n    \"Fixation de limites d'exportation annuelles basées sur la capacité de production locale des pays concernés.\",\n    \"Exigence de licences spéciales pour l'exportation de matériel IA et l'accès à distance via le cloud.\",\n    \"Priorité aux commandes des clients américains avant toute exportation vers des entités restreintes.\",\n    \"Tests obligatoires par des tiers indépendants pour vérifier les capacités techniques avant l'expédition.\",\n    \"Interdiction pour les entités à risque de transférer des modèles d'IA entraînés sur le matériel exporté.\"\n  ],\n  \"es_ai_title\": \"Ley SCALE: Nuevas reglas para exportar chips de IA a países de riesgo\",\n  \"es_summary\": \"Esta ley establece controles estrictos sobre la venta de hardware avanzado de inteligencia artificial a países como China y Rusia. Busca proteger la seguridad nacional asegurando que los adversarios no alcancen la capacidad tecnológica de EE. UU.\",\n  \"es_key_points\": [\n    \"Establece límites anuales de exportación basados en lo que cada país puede producir por sí mismo.\",\n    \"Requiere licencias especiales para exportar hardware de IA y para permitir el acceso remoto a través de la nube.\",\n    \"Prioriza los pedidos de clientes estadounidenses sobre las exportaciones a entidades bajo restricción.\",\n    \"Exige pruebas independientes del hardware antes del envío para verificar sus capacidades técnicas.\",\n    \"Impide que entidades de riesgo utilicen el hardware exportado para entrenar modelos de IA no autorizados.\"\n  ],\n  \"it_ai_title\": \"Legge SCALE: Nuove regole per l'esportazione di chip IA verso paesi a rischio\",\n  \"it_summary\": \"Questa legge introduce controlli rigorosi sulla vendita di hardware avanzato per l'intelligenza artificiale a paesi come Cina e Russia. L'obiettivo è tutelare la sicurezza nazionale e mantenere il vantaggio tecnologico degli Stati Uniti.\",\n  \"it_key_points\": [\n    \"Fissazione di limiti annuali all'esportazione basati sulla capacità di produzione interna dei paesi interessati.\",\n    \"Obbligo di licenze speciali per l'esportazione di hardware IA e per l'accesso remoto tramite servizi cloud.\",\n    \"Priorità agli ordini dei clienti statunitensi rispetto alle esportazioni verso entità soggette a restrizioni.\",\n    \"Test obbligatori da parte di terzi indipendenti per verificare le specifiche tecniche prima della spedizione.\",\n    \"Divieto per i destinatari di trasferire modelli di IA addestrati sull'hardware esportato a utenti non autorizzati.\"\n  ],\n  \"nl_ai_title\": \"SCALE Act: Nieuwe regels voor export van AI-chips naar risicolanden\",\n  \"nl_summary\": \"Deze wet voert strikte controles in op de verkoop van geavanceerde AI-hardware aan landen als China en Rusland. Het doel is de nationale veiligheid te beschermen door de technologische voorsprong van de VS te waarborgen.\",\n  \"nl_key_points\": [\n    \"Jaarlijkse exportlimieten op basis van de eigen productiecapaciteit van de betreffende landen.\",\n    \"Vergunningsplicht voor de export van AI-hardware en voor externe toegang via clouddiensten.\",\n    \"Voorrang voor Amerikaanse klanten bij leveringen boven export naar beperkte entiteiten.\",\n    \"Verplichte onafhankelijke tests van hardware vóór verzending om technische specificaties te controleren.\",\n    \"Beperkingen op het trainen van AI-modellen door entiteiten uit risicolanden met geëxporteerde hardware.\"\n  ],\n  \"pt_ai_title\": \"Lei SCALE: Novas regras para exportação de chips de IA para países de risco\",\n  \"pt_summary\": \"Esta lei estabelece controlos rigorosos sobre a venda de hardware avançado de inteligência artificial para países como a China e a Rússia. O objetivo é proteger a segurança nacional e manter a liderança tecnológica dos EUA.\",\n  \"pt_key_points\": [\n    \"Definição de limites anuais de exportação com base na capacidade de produção própria dos países em questão.\",\n    \"Exigência de licenças especiais para exportar hardware de IA e para fornecer acesso remoto via nuvem.\",\n    \"Prioridade aos pedidos de clientes dos EUA antes de qualquer exportação para entidades restritas.\",\n    \"Testes obrigatórios por laboratórios independentes para verificar as capacidades técnicas antes do envio.\",\n    \"Restrições à transferência de modelos de IA treinados no hardware exportado para utilizadores não autorizados.\"\n  ],\n  \"category\": [\"Security\", \"Economy\", \"Informatization\"]\n}"
    }
  ]
}