{
  "legislationId": "119_HR_8310",
  "lastUpdate": "2026-04-21T11:31:47.383Z",
  "history": [
    {
      "timestamp": "2026-04-21T11:31:47.383Z",
      "source_url": "https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/hr8310/BILLS-119hr8310ih.htm",
      "model": "gemini-flash-lite-latest",
      "prompt_sent": "\nROLE: Fact Checker.\nZADANIE: Porównaj SOURCE (oryginał) i SUMMARY (streszczenie przygotowane przez inne AI).\n\nTwoim celem jest wykrycie \"ZMYŚLONYCH KONKRETÓW\" (Fabricated Entities) w SUMMARY.\n\nSOURCE:\n[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.R. 8310 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 8310 To establish protections for health care providers who raise concerns about the quality of health care services, and for other purposes. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 15, 2026 Ms. Scanlon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To establish protections for health care providers who raise concerns about the quality of health care services, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Patient Safety and Whistleblower Protections Act''. SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. In this Act: (1) The term ``communicate'', with respect to health care safety information, includes written or oral communications. (2) The term ``government official'' means any local, State, Tribal, or Federal Governmental official, including municipal mayors and their staff, State governors and their staff, State legislators and their staff, Federal legislators and their staff, and staff or leaders of Federal agencies or other Federal authorities. (3) The term ``health care facility'' means a facility in which health care services are provided, including any hospitals, ambulatory surgery centers, skilled nursing facilities, home health agencies, clinics, urgent care centers, physician offices, dental offices, end-stage renal facilities, chiropractic offices, optometry offices, ophthalmology offices, nursing homes, behavioral health centers, community mental health centers, addiction treatment facilities, rehabilitation centers, hospices, outpatient therapy facilities, and Federally qualified health centers. (4) The term ``health care practitioner'' means an individual who is licensed by a State, or otherwise authorized, to provide health care services. (5) The term ``health care service'' means care, treatment, services, or other procedures to maintain, diagnose, or otherwise affect an individual's physical or mental condition. Such term includes medical, paramedical, nursing, chiropractic, dental, behavioral, psychiatric, psychological, and vision services. (6) The term ``patient safety concern'' means a communication regarding a concern that materially affects the health of one of more patients or that has the potential to materially affect the health of one or more patients, including a concern about-- (A) the quality of health care, patient safety, or staffing practices, such as the type of health care practitioner caring for patients or the number of patients for whom a health care practitioner is responsible; or (B) the sufficiency of equipment or supplies for the health care services provided, or the appropriateness of health care services or referrals for patients. (7) The term ``retaliation'' means any adverse employment action against a health care practitioner or any other materially adverse action that would dissuade a reasonable health care practitioner from raising patient safety concerns, including adverse actions against a health care practitioner who is no longer employed by, contracting with, or otherwise providing health care services at the health facility to which the patient safety concerns relate. SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON RETALIATION. (a) In General.--A health care facility may not retaliate against a health care practitioner for communicating about patient safety concerns, including any written or oral patient safety concerns communicated to-- (1) any supervisors, colleagues, or another individuals with authority over health care services or the clinical or financial operations of the health care facility; (2) a State authority with oversight of health care services, health care practitioners, or health care facilities; (3) a government official, including communications at a hearing, in response to written or oral questions from a government officials, or in a meeting, phone call, email, or other communication; (4) a patient safety organization, as defined in section 921 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 299b-21); (5) any individual, organization, or other body investigating patient safety concerns in response to a communication made by another health care practitioner; or (6) only after 90 days following a communication to a person described in paragraphs (1), (2), or (4) that did not result in significant corrective action, to the news media or press. (b) Rebuttable Presumption.--There shall be a rebuttable presumption that any adverse employment action or other materially adverse action against the health care practitioner within 180 days of the health care practitioner communicating about patient safety concerns is retaliation. (c) Attribution to Health Care Facility.--Any retaliation by a health care practitioner, manager, supervisor, executive, staffing company, provider organization that contracts to provide services at the health care facility, or management services company shall be attributed to the health care facility that is the subject of the patient safety concerns. A health care facility may seek indemnification or contribution from a staffing company, provider organization that contracts to provide services at the health care facility, or management services company for retaliation attributed to the health care facility under this subsection. (d) Clarification.--Nothing in this section prohibits any adverse employment action or other materially adverse action against a health care practitioner that is not in retaliation for communicating about patient safety concerns. (e) Inapplicability of Certain Contractual Provisions.-- Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any contractual provision that would prohibit a provider from communicating about patient safety concerns, or otherwise speaking truthfully about the quality of health care services, shall be null and void. (f) Inapplicability of Non-Competition Provisions.--A health care practitioner who communicates about patient safety concerns shall be released from any existing non-competition agreement with the employer or contractor of the health care practitioner if the non-competition agreement relates to the health care practitioner's employment or contract work at the health facility that is the subject of the patient safety concerns. (g) Bad Faith Communications.--Nothing in this section shall be construed as prohibiting a civil lawsuit against a health care practitioner who communicated about patient safety concerns in bad faith, if an independent investigation has determined that the patient safety concerns were not valid. SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT. (a) Individual Actions.-- (1) In general.--A health care facility that retaliates against a health care practitioner for communicating patient safety concerns is liable to that practitioner in an amount equal to the sums determined in paragraph (2). (2) Damages.--In an individual action under paragraph (1), the sum awarded for liability is equal to-- (A) actual damage sustained by the health care practitioner; (B) attorney's fees and costs; and (C) punitive damages of up to $1,000,000. (b) Class Actions.-- (1) In general.--Class actions are authorized for health care practitioners who communicate patient safety concerns at the same health care facility or at different health care facilities under the same management or ownership. The subject of the patient safety concerns or the form of retaliation need not be identical to establish a common scheme of retaliating against health care practitioners who communicate patient safety concerns. (2) Damages.--In a class action under paragraph (1), the sum awarded for liability is equal to-- (A) the greater of $10,000 or actual damages for each named individual; (B) a total amount for all other class members, without regard to a minimum individual recovery amount, of the greatest of-- (i) actual damages; (ii) $500,000; (iii) 1 percent of the net worth of the defendant health care facility; or (iv) if the defendant health care facility is fully owned, directly or indirectly, by another entity or entities, and, among all such entities that own such facility, the entity with the highest net worth owns at least 1 other health care facility at which retaliation for raising patient safety concerns is alleged in another action under this section or in a complaint described in subsection (d)(1), 1 percent of the net worth of such entity with the highest net worth that owns the health care facility; and (C) attorney's fees and costs. (c) Statute of Limitations.--Any action alleging retaliation for communicating patient safety concerns under this section may be commenced not later than 3 years after the last action that is alleged to be retaliatory occurs. (d) Requirements Prior To Bring an Action.--An action alleging retaliation for communicating patient safety concerns may be filed-- (1) after the health care practitioner-- (A) files a complaint with the State authority that licenses or otherwise oversees the health care facility that is the subject of the complaint; and (B) in the case that the health facility that is the subject of the patient safety concerns is a hospital, files a complaint with the Joint Commission on Hospital Accreditation; and (2) not earlier than the date on which-- (A) the State authority described in paragraph (1)(A) completes its investigation pursuant to such paragraph, and, as applicable, the Joint Commission on Hospital Accreditation described in paragraph (1)(B) completes its investigation pursuant to such paragraph; or (B) 180 days after the filing of a complaint under paragraph (1)(A) and, if applicable, a complaint under paragraph (1)(B). SEC. 5. PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY ACTIONS. In any civil or criminal action against a health care facility or health care practitioner relating to professional liability, communications about patient safety concerns made by the health care practitioner that is the subject of the civil or criminal action may not be used to draw an adverse inference about the quality of health care services provided by the health care practitioner. The preceding sentence shall only apply if the communications about patient safety concerns were made by the health care practitioner prior to the filing of the civil or criminal action against the health care facility or health care practitioner. SEC. 6. REQUIRING THE REPORTING AND RESOLUTION OF PATIENT SAFETY CONCERNS FOR PROVIDERS OF SERVICES PARTICIPATING IN MEDICARE. (a) In General.--Section 1866(a)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395cc(a)(1)) is amended-- (1) by moving subparagraphs (W) and (X) 2 ems to the left; (2) in subparagraph (X), by striking ``and'' at the end; (3) in subparagraph (Y), by striking the period at the end and inserting ``, and''; and (4) by inserting after subparagraph (Y) the following new subparagraph: ``(Z) to establish-- ``(i) a mechanism that allows a health care provider or practitioner to anonymously report patient safety concerns; and ``(ii) a process for investigating and addressing any patient safety concern reported to the provider of services.''. (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall take effect 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act. SEC. 7. IMPACT ON OTHER LAWS WITH RESPECT TO REPORTING PATIENT SAFETY CONCERNS. Nothing in this Act, including the amendments made by this Act, shall be construed to limit or supersede the protections for health care providers with respect to reporting patient safety events pursuant to part C of title IX of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 299b- 21 et seq.) or any other Federal or State law on patient safety reporting. <all>\n\nSUMMARY TO EVALUATE:\nTitle: Patient Safety and Whistleblower Protections Act for Healthcare Workers\nSummary: This act protects healthcare workers who report safety concerns, such as poor care quality or staffing shortages, from being fired or punished. It aims to improve patient safety by ensuring medical staff can speak up without fear of losing their jobs.\nKey Points: Prohibits retaliation against staff who report safety issues to supervisors, officials, or the media., Allows workers to sue for damages, including up to $1 million in punitive fines against employers., Cancels non-compete and secrecy agreements that prevent reporting on healthcare quality., Requires healthcare facilities to set up anonymous reporting systems for safety concerns.\n\nZASADY OCENY:\n1. Sprawdź wszystkie LICZBY, DATY i KWOTY w SUMMARY. Jeśli którejś brakuje w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n2. Sprawdź wszystkie NAZWISKA, ORGANIZACJE i MIEJSCA w SUMMARY. Jeśli którejś brakuje w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n3. Sprawdź wszystkie konkretne DZIAŁANIA PRAWNE . Jeśli tego mechanizmu nie ma w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n\nWAŻNE: Abstrakcyjne pojęcia (np. \"transparentność\", \"zaufanie\") są dozwolone jako wnioski.\n\nOUTPUT (JSON):\n{\n  \"is_valid\": true/false,\n  \"issue\": \"fabricated_entity\" / \"contradiction\" / \"none\"\n}\n\nWYMAGANIA FORMATOWANIA:\n1. Odpowiedz WYŁĄCZNIE surowym obiektem JSON.\n2. NIE używaj bloków kodu Markdown.\n3. NIE dodawaj żadnych wstępów ani wyjaśnień przed ani po JSONie.\n4. JSON musi być poprawny i gotowy do parsowania.\n\n",
      "ai_response_raw": "{\n  \"is_valid\": true,\n  \"issue\": \"none\"\n}"
    },
    {
      "timestamp": "2026-04-21T11:18:26.031Z",
      "source_url": "https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/hr8310/BILLS-119hr8310ih.htm",
      "model": "gemini-flash-latest",
      "prompt_sent": "\nJesteś ekspertem od prawa Stanów Zjednoczonych, który ma za zadanie analizować dokumenty ustaw, uchwał oraz innych dokumentów legislacyjnych, a następnie przygotowywać z nich informacje w przystępny sposób dla obywateli. Twoim celem jest przedstawienie informacji tak, aby obywatele mogli sami ocenić wpływ legislacji na ich życie, nawet bez posiadania specjalistycznej wiedzy legislacyjnej. Skup się na faktach i obiektywnych skutkach wprowadzanych zmian, unikając wartościowania i osobistych opinii. Wszelki żargon prawny jest zabroniony. Prezentuj informacje w jasny, zwięzły i angażujący sposób, tak aby były zrozumiałe dla osoby bez wykształcenia prawniczego. Unikaj długich, złożonych zdań. Zamiast pisać \"projekt ma na celu nowelizację kodeksu podatkowego...\", napisz \"Zmiany w podatkach: nowe ulgi i obowiązki dla...\". Kontynuuj swoją pracę, dopóki nie rozwiążesz swojego zadania. Jeśli nie masz pewności co do generowanej treści, przeanalizuj dokument ponownie – nie zgaduj. Rozplanuj dobrze swoje zadanie przed przystąpieniem do niego. W podsumowaniu i kluczowych punktach, jeśli to możliwe i uzasadnione, podkreśl, jakie konkretne korzyści lub skutki (pozytywne lub negatywne) wprowadza ustawa dla życia codziennego obywateli, ich praw i obowiązków, finansów osobistych, bezpieczeństwa i innych ważnych kwestii (np. kategorycznych zakazów i nakazów czy najważniejszych konkretnych alokacji finansowych i terytorialnych).\n\nTwoja odpowiedź MUSI być w formacie JSON - i zawierać następujące klucze.\nZanim zwrócisz odpowiedź, dokładnie zweryfikuj, czy cała struktura JSON jest w 100% poprawna, włącznie ze wszystkimi przecinkami, nawiasami klamrowymi, kwadratowymi oraz cudzysłowami. Błędny JSON jest nieakceptowalny i uniemożliwi przetworzenie Twojej pracy.\n\nPrzeanalizuj dokładnie poniższy tekst dokumentu prawnego. To jest treść, na podstawie której masz wygenerować podsumowanie i kluczowe punkty:\n--- POCZĄTEK DOKUMENTU ---\n[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.R. 8310 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 8310 To establish protections for health care providers who raise concerns about the quality of health care services, and for other purposes. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 15, 2026 Ms. Scanlon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To establish protections for health care providers who raise concerns about the quality of health care services, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Patient Safety and Whistleblower Protections Act''. SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. In this Act: (1) The term ``communicate'', with respect to health care safety information, includes written or oral communications. (2) The term ``government official'' means any local, State, Tribal, or Federal Governmental official, including municipal mayors and their staff, State governors and their staff, State legislators and their staff, Federal legislators and their staff, and staff or leaders of Federal agencies or other Federal authorities. (3) The term ``health care facility'' means a facility in which health care services are provided, including any hospitals, ambulatory surgery centers, skilled nursing facilities, home health agencies, clinics, urgent care centers, physician offices, dental offices, end-stage renal facilities, chiropractic offices, optometry offices, ophthalmology offices, nursing homes, behavioral health centers, community mental health centers, addiction treatment facilities, rehabilitation centers, hospices, outpatient therapy facilities, and Federally qualified health centers. (4) The term ``health care practitioner'' means an individual who is licensed by a State, or otherwise authorized, to provide health care services. (5) The term ``health care service'' means care, treatment, services, or other procedures to maintain, diagnose, or otherwise affect an individual's physical or mental condition. Such term includes medical, paramedical, nursing, chiropractic, dental, behavioral, psychiatric, psychological, and vision services. (6) The term ``patient safety concern'' means a communication regarding a concern that materially affects the health of one of more patients or that has the potential to materially affect the health of one or more patients, including a concern about-- (A) the quality of health care, patient safety, or staffing practices, such as the type of health care practitioner caring for patients or the number of patients for whom a health care practitioner is responsible; or (B) the sufficiency of equipment or supplies for the health care services provided, or the appropriateness of health care services or referrals for patients. (7) The term ``retaliation'' means any adverse employment action against a health care practitioner or any other materially adverse action that would dissuade a reasonable health care practitioner from raising patient safety concerns, including adverse actions against a health care practitioner who is no longer employed by, contracting with, or otherwise providing health care services at the health facility to which the patient safety concerns relate. SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON RETALIATION. (a) In General.--A health care facility may not retaliate against a health care practitioner for communicating about patient safety concerns, including any written or oral patient safety concerns communicated to-- (1) any supervisors, colleagues, or another individuals with authority over health care services or the clinical or financial operations of the health care facility; (2) a State authority with oversight of health care services, health care practitioners, or health care facilities; (3) a government official, including communications at a hearing, in response to written or oral questions from a government officials, or in a meeting, phone call, email, or other communication; (4) a patient safety organization, as defined in section 921 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 299b-21); (5) any individual, organization, or other body investigating patient safety concerns in response to a communication made by another health care practitioner; or (6) only after 90 days following a communication to a person described in paragraphs (1), (2), or (4) that did not result in significant corrective action, to the news media or press. (b) Rebuttable Presumption.--There shall be a rebuttable presumption that any adverse employment action or other materially adverse action against the health care practitioner within 180 days of the health care practitioner communicating about patient safety concerns is retaliation. (c) Attribution to Health Care Facility.--Any retaliation by a health care practitioner, manager, supervisor, executive, staffing company, provider organization that contracts to provide services at the health care facility, or management services company shall be attributed to the health care facility that is the subject of the patient safety concerns. A health care facility may seek indemnification or contribution from a staffing company, provider organization that contracts to provide services at the health care facility, or management services company for retaliation attributed to the health care facility under this subsection. (d) Clarification.--Nothing in this section prohibits any adverse employment action or other materially adverse action against a health care practitioner that is not in retaliation for communicating about patient safety concerns. (e) Inapplicability of Certain Contractual Provisions.-- Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any contractual provision that would prohibit a provider from communicating about patient safety concerns, or otherwise speaking truthfully about the quality of health care services, shall be null and void. (f) Inapplicability of Non-Competition Provisions.--A health care practitioner who communicates about patient safety concerns shall be released from any existing non-competition agreement with the employer or contractor of the health care practitioner if the non-competition agreement relates to the health care practitioner's employment or contract work at the health facility that is the subject of the patient safety concerns. (g) Bad Faith Communications.--Nothing in this section shall be construed as prohibiting a civil lawsuit against a health care practitioner who communicated about patient safety concerns in bad faith, if an independent investigation has determined that the patient safety concerns were not valid. SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT. (a) Individual Actions.-- (1) In general.--A health care facility that retaliates against a health care practitioner for communicating patient safety concerns is liable to that practitioner in an amount equal to the sums determined in paragraph (2). (2) Damages.--In an individual action under paragraph (1), the sum awarded for liability is equal to-- (A) actual damage sustained by the health care practitioner; (B) attorney's fees and costs; and (C) punitive damages of up to $1,000,000. (b) Class Actions.-- (1) In general.--Class actions are authorized for health care practitioners who communicate patient safety concerns at the same health care facility or at different health care facilities under the same management or ownership. The subject of the patient safety concerns or the form of retaliation need not be identical to establish a common scheme of retaliating against health care practitioners who communicate patient safety concerns. (2) Damages.--In a class action under paragraph (1), the sum awarded for liability is equal to-- (A) the greater of $10,000 or actual damages for each named individual; (B) a total amount for all other class members, without regard to a minimum individual recovery amount, of the greatest of-- (i) actual damages; (ii) $500,000; (iii) 1 percent of the net worth of the defendant health care facility; or (iv) if the defendant health care facility is fully owned, directly or indirectly, by another entity or entities, and, among all such entities that own such facility, the entity with the highest net worth owns at least 1 other health care facility at which retaliation for raising patient safety concerns is alleged in another action under this section or in a complaint described in subsection (d)(1), 1 percent of the net worth of such entity with the highest net worth that owns the health care facility; and (C) attorney's fees and costs. (c) Statute of Limitations.--Any action alleging retaliation for communicating patient safety concerns under this section may be commenced not later than 3 years after the last action that is alleged to be retaliatory occurs. (d) Requirements Prior To Bring an Action.--An action alleging retaliation for communicating patient safety concerns may be filed-- (1) after the health care practitioner-- (A) files a complaint with the State authority that licenses or otherwise oversees the health care facility that is the subject of the complaint; and (B) in the case that the health facility that is the subject of the patient safety concerns is a hospital, files a complaint with the Joint Commission on Hospital Accreditation; and (2) not earlier than the date on which-- (A) the State authority described in paragraph (1)(A) completes its investigation pursuant to such paragraph, and, as applicable, the Joint Commission on Hospital Accreditation described in paragraph (1)(B) completes its investigation pursuant to such paragraph; or (B) 180 days after the filing of a complaint under paragraph (1)(A) and, if applicable, a complaint under paragraph (1)(B). SEC. 5. PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY ACTIONS. In any civil or criminal action against a health care facility or health care practitioner relating to professional liability, communications about patient safety concerns made by the health care practitioner that is the subject of the civil or criminal action may not be used to draw an adverse inference about the quality of health care services provided by the health care practitioner. The preceding sentence shall only apply if the communications about patient safety concerns were made by the health care practitioner prior to the filing of the civil or criminal action against the health care facility or health care practitioner. SEC. 6. REQUIRING THE REPORTING AND RESOLUTION OF PATIENT SAFETY CONCERNS FOR PROVIDERS OF SERVICES PARTICIPATING IN MEDICARE. (a) In General.--Section 1866(a)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395cc(a)(1)) is amended-- (1) by moving subparagraphs (W) and (X) 2 ems to the left; (2) in subparagraph (X), by striking ``and'' at the end; (3) in subparagraph (Y), by striking the period at the end and inserting ``, and''; and (4) by inserting after subparagraph (Y) the following new subparagraph: ``(Z) to establish-- ``(i) a mechanism that allows a health care provider or practitioner to anonymously report patient safety concerns; and ``(ii) a process for investigating and addressing any patient safety concern reported to the provider of services.''. (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall take effect 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act. SEC. 7. IMPACT ON OTHER LAWS WITH RESPECT TO REPORTING PATIENT SAFETY CONCERNS. Nothing in this Act, including the amendments made by this Act, shall be construed to limit or supersede the protections for health care providers with respect to reporting patient safety events pursuant to part C of title IX of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 299b- 21 et seq.) or any other Federal or State law on patient safety reporting. <all>\n--- KONIEC DOKUMENTU ---\n\nPAMIĘTAJ: Twoja odpowiedź MUSI być wyłącznie poprawnym obiektem JSON. Nie dodawaj żadnych dodatkowych znaków, komentarzy ani tekstu przed znacznikiem '{' ani po znaczniku '}'. Cała odpowiedź musi być parsowalna jako JSON.\nNa podstawie POWYŻSZEGO dokumentu, wypełnij poniższą strukturę JSON:\nOto struktura JSON, której oczekuję (wypełnij ją treścią):\n{\n  \"pl_ai_title\": \"Nowy, krótki tytuł dla aktu prawnego po polsku, oddający sedno wprowadzanych zmian (np. maksymalnie 10-12 słów).\",\n  \"pl_summary\": \"2-3 zdania zwięzłego podsumowania treści aktu prawnego po polsku, napisane z perspektywy wpływu na życie codzienne obywateli.\",\n  \"pl_key_points\": [\n    \"Pierwszy krótki punkt po polsku dotyczący najważniejszych wprowadzanych rozwiązań lub zmian.\",\n    \"Drugi krótki punkt po polsku...\"\n  ],\n  \"eng_ai_title\": \"A new, short title for the legal act in English, capturing the essence of the changes (e.g., max 10-12 words).\",\n  \"eng_summary\": \"2-3 sentences summarizing the legal act in English, from the perspective of its impact on citizens' daily lives.\",\n  \"eng_key_points\": [\n    \"First short bullet point in English regarding the most important solutions or changes being introduced.\",\n    \"Second short bullet point in English...\"\n  ],\n  \"de_ai_title\": \"Ein neuer, kurzer Titel für das Rechtsdokument auf Deutsch, der den Kern der Änderungen erfasst (z.B. max. 10-12 Wörter).\",\n  \"de_summary\": \"2-3 Sätze Zusammenfassung des Rechtsdokuments auf Deutsch, aus der Perspektive seiner Auswirkungen auf das tägliche Leben der Bürger.\",\n  \"de_key_points\": [\n    \"Erster kurzer Stichpunkt auf Deutsch zu den wichtigsten eingeführten Lösungen oder Änderungen.\",\n    \"Zweiter kurzer Stichpunkt auf Deutsch...\"\n  ],\n  \"fr_ai_title\": \"Un nouveau titre court pour l'acte juridique en français, saisissant l'essence des changements (par exemple, 10-12 mots maximum).\",\n  \"fr_summary\": \"Résumé de 2-3 phrases de l'acte juridique en français, du point de vue de son impact sur la vie quotidienne des citoyens.\",\n  \"fr_key_points\": [\n    \"Premier court point en français concernant les solutions ou changements les plus importants introduits.\",\n    \"Deuxième court point en français...\"\n  ],\n  \"es_ai_title\": \"Un nuevo título breve para el acto jurídico en español, que recoja la esencia de los cambios (por ejemplo, máximo 10-12 palabras).\",\n  \"es_summary\": \"Resumen de 2-3 frases del acto jurídico en español, desde la perspectiva de su impacto en la vida cotidiana de los ciudadanos.\",\n  \"es_key_points\": [\n    \"Primer punto breve en español sobre las soluciones o cambios más importantes que se introducen.\",\n    \"Segundo punto breve en español...\"\n  ],\n  \"it_ai_title\": \"Un nuovo titolo breve per l'atto giuridico in italiano, che colga l'essenza delle modifiche (ad es. massimo 10-12 parole).\",\n  \"it_summary\": \"Riepilogo di 2-3 frasi dell'atto giuridico in italiano, dal punto di vista del suo impatto sulla vita quotidiana dei cittadini.\",\n  \"it_key_points\": [\n    \"Primo breve punto in italiano riguardante le soluzioni o le modifiche più importanti introdotte.\",\n    \"Secondo breve punto in italiano...\"\n  ],\n  \"nl_ai_title\": \"Een nieuwe, korte titel voor de rechtshandeling in het Nederlands, die de essentie van de wijzigingen weergeeft (bijv. max. 10-12 woorden).\",\n  \"nl_summary\": \"Samenvatting van 2-3 zinnen van de rechtshandeling in het Nederlands, vanuit het perspectief van de impact op het dagelijks leven van burgers.\",\n  \"nl_key_points\": [\n    \"Eerste korte punt in het Nederlands betreffende de belangrijkste geïntroduceerde oplossingen of wijzigingen.\",\n    \"Tweede korte punt in het Nederlands...\"\n  ],\n  \"pt_ai_title\": \"Um novo título curto para o ato jurídico em português, capturando a essência das mudanças (por exemplo, máx. 10-12 palavras).\",\n  \"pt_summary\": \"Resumo de 2-3 frases do ato jurídico em português, na perspetiva do seu impacto na vida quotidiana dos cidadãos.\",\n  \"pt_key_points\": [\n    \"Primeiro ponto curto em português sobre as soluções ou alterações mais importantes introduzidas.\",\n    \"Segundo ponto curto em português...\"\n  ],\n  \"category\": [\"Categorize the document into one category by default, based on the field it primarily concerns. Choose up to 3 if the document also touches upon SIGNIFICANT issues from other categories. You MUST select categories ONLY from the following list: Health, Education, Family, Taxes, Labor, Security, Environment, Courts and Law, Transport, Benefits, Real Estate, Media and Culture, Local Government, Migration, Agriculture, Public Investments, Informatization, Economy. If the document does not definitively fit any of these, you MUST use \"Other\". If you use \"Other\", it should be the ONLY category selected. Do NOT invent new categories. The response must be an array of strings, e.g., [\"Taxes\", \"Family\"].\"]\n}\n\n",
      "ai_response_raw": "{\n  \"pl_ai_title\": \"Ochrona pracowników medycznych zgłaszających zagrożenia dla bezpieczeństwa pacjentów\",\n  \"pl_summary\": \"Ustawa wprowadza silną ochronę prawną dla personelu medycznego, który informuje o zaniedbaniach lub brakach kadrowych zagrażających pacjentom. Dzięki temu pacjenci mogą liczyć na wyższą jakość opieki, a pracownicy nie muszą obawiać się zwolnienia za mówienie prawdy.\",\n  \"pl_key_points\": [\n    \"Zakaz karania pracowników za zgłaszanie problemów z jakością leczenia, brakiem personelu lub sprzętu.\",\n    \"Możliwość uzyskania do 1 miliona dolarów odszkodowania karnego za odwet ze strony pracodawcy.\",\n    \"Unieważnienie umów o zakazie konkurencji i poufności, które blokują informowanie o bezpieczeństwie.\",\n    \"Obowiązek stworzenia anonimowych systemów zgłaszania nieprawidłowości w placówkach medycznych.\"\n  ],\n  \"eng_ai_title\": \"Patient Safety and Whistleblower Protections Act for Healthcare Workers\",\n  \"eng_summary\": \"This act protects healthcare workers who report safety concerns, such as poor care quality or staffing shortages, from being fired or punished. It aims to improve patient safety by ensuring medical staff can speak up without fear of losing their jobs.\",\n  \"eng_key_points\": [\n    \"Prohibits retaliation against staff who report safety issues to supervisors, officials, or the media.\",\n    \"Allows workers to sue for damages, including up to $1 million in punitive fines against employers.\",\n    \"Cancels non-compete and secrecy agreements that prevent reporting on healthcare quality.\",\n    \"Requires healthcare facilities to set up anonymous reporting systems for safety concerns.\"\n  ],\n  \"de_ai_title\": \"Gesetz zum Schutz von Whistleblowern im Gesundheitswesen und zur Patientensicherheit\",\n  \"de_summary\": \"Dieses Gesetz schützt medizinisches Personal, das Sicherheitsmängel oder Personalmangel meldet, vor Kündigung oder Benachteiligung. Es fördert die Patientensicherheit, indem es sicherstellt, dass Missstände ohne Angst vor Konsequenzen angesprochen werden können.\",\n  \"de_key_points\": [\n    \"Verbot von Vergeltungsmaßnahmen gegen Mitarbeiter, die Sicherheitsbedenken äußern.\",\n    \"Möglichkeit auf Schadensersatz und Strafzahlungen von bis zu 1 Million Dollar bei rechtswidriger Kündigung.\",\n    \"Nichtigkeitserklärung von Geheimhaltungs- und Wettbewerbsverboten, die Meldungen behindern.\",\n    \"Pflicht zur Einrichtung anonymer Meldesysteme in medizinischen Einrichtungen.\"\n  ],\n  \"fr_ai_title\": \"Loi sur la protection des lanceurs d'alerte et la sécurité des patients\",\n  \"fr_summary\": \"Cette loi protège les professionnels de santé qui signalent des problèmes de sécurité ou de manque de personnel contre les sanctions de leur employeur. Elle vise à améliorer la qualité des soins en permettant au personnel de s'exprimer librement sur les risques pour les patients.\",\n  \"fr_key_points\": [\n    \"Interdiction de toute mesure de rétorsion contre le personnel signalant des risques pour les patients.\",\n    \"Droit à des dommages-intérêts pouvant atteindre 1 million de dollars en cas de représailles.\",\n    \"Annulation des clauses de non-concurrence et de confidentialité empêchant de signaler des problèmes de qualité.\",\n    \"Obligation pour les établissements de santé de créer des systèmes de signalement anonymes.\"\n  ],\n  \"es_ai_title\": \"Ley de Protección de Denunciantes y Seguridad del Paciente en Salud\",\n  \"es_summary\": \"Esta ley protege al personal sanitario que denuncia deficiencias en la atención o falta de personal, evitando que sufran represalias laborales. El objetivo es garantizar una atención médica más segura al permitir que los profesionales hablen sin miedo.\",\n  \"es_key_points\": [\n    \"Prohibición de castigar a empleados por informar sobre riesgos para la salud de los pacientes.\",\n    \"Posibilidad de reclamar indemnizaciones de hasta 1 millón de dólares por represalias del empleador.\",\n    \"Anulación de contratos de confidencialidad o no competencia que impidan denunciar fallos de seguridad.\",\n    \"Obligación de implementar canales de denuncia anónimos en centros de salud.\"\n  ],\n  \"it_ai_title\": \"Legge sulla protezione dei segnalatori e la sicurezza dei pazienti in sanità\",\n  \"it_summary\": \"Questa legge tutela gli operatori sanitari che segnalano carenze nella qualità delle cure o mancanza di personale, impedendo ritorsioni da parte dei datori di lavoro. Mira a migliorare la sicurezza dei pazienti garantendo che il personale possa parlare liberamente dei rischi.\",\n  \"it_key_points\": [\n    \"Divieto di ritorsioni contro il personale che segnala problemi di sicurezza o carenze di organico.\",\n    \"Diritto a risarcimenti fino a 1 milione di dollari in caso di azioni punitive ingiustificate.\",\n    \"Annullamento di patti di non concorrenza e clausole di segretezza che ostacolano le segnalazioni.\",\n    \"Obbligo per le strutture sanitarie di istituire sistemi di segnalazione anonimi.\"\n  ],\n  \"nl_ai_title\": \"Wet op de bescherming van klokkenluiders en patiëntveiligheid in de zorg\",\n  \"nl_summary\": \"Deze wet beschermt zorgverleners die veiligheidsproblemen of personeelstekorten melden tegen ontslag of andere strafmaatregelen. Het doel is de patiëntveiligheid te vergroten door ervoor te zorgen dat medisch personeel misstanden durft aan te kaarten.\",\n  \"nl_key_points\": [\n    \"Verbod op vergelding tegen personeel dat zorgen over de patiëntveiligheid uit.\",\n    \"Mogelijkheid tot schadevergoedingen tot 1 miljoen dollar bij onterechte sancties door de werkgever.\",\n    \"Ongeldigverklaring van geheimhoudings- en concurrentiebedingen die meldingen blokkeren.\",\n    \"Verplichting voor zorginstellingen om anonieme meldsystemen voor onregelmatigheden op te zetten.\"\n  ],\n  \"pt_ai_title\": \"Lei de Proteção de Denunciantes e Segurança do Paciente na Saúde\",\n  \"pt_summary\": \"Esta lei protege os profissionais de saúde que denunciam falhas na qualidade do atendimento ou falta de pessoal contra represálias no trabalho. O objetivo é aumentar a segurança dos pacientes, permitindo que a equipa médica relate problemas sem medo.\",\n  \"pt_key_points\": [\n    \"Proibição de retaliação contra funcionários que comuniquem riscos para a segurança dos pacientes.\",\n    \"Direito a indemnizações de até 1 milhão de dólares em caso de punições indevidas.\",\n    \"Anulação de cláusulas de confidencialidade ou não concorrência que impeçam denúncias de segurança.\",\n    \"Obrigação de criar sistemas de denúncia anónima em unidades de saúde.\"\n  ],\n  \"category\": [\"Health\", \"Labor\", \"Courts and Law\"]\n}"
    }
  ]
}