{
  "legislationId": "119_HR_8407",
  "lastUpdate": "2026-04-28T11:20:59.087Z",
  "history": [
    {
      "timestamp": "2026-04-28T11:20:59.087Z",
      "source_url": "https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/hr8407/BILLS-119hr8407ih.htm",
      "model": "gemini-flash-lite-latest",
      "prompt_sent": "\nROLE: Fact Checker.\nZADANIE: Porównaj SOURCE (oryginał) i SUMMARY (streszczenie przygotowane przez inne AI).\n\nTwoim celem jest wykrycie \"ZMYŚLONYCH KONKRETÓW\" (Fabricated Entities) w SUMMARY.\n\nSOURCE:\n[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.R. 8407 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 8407 To direct the Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology to establish a Commission on Hazard Risk Assessment Tools, and for other purposes. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 21, 2026 Mr. Scott Franklin of Florida (for himself, Mr. Amo, and Mr. Miller of Ohio) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To direct the Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology to establish a Commission on Hazard Risk Assessment Tools, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Advancing Consistent and Credible Use of Risk Assessment Tools and Evaluation Act'' or the ``ACCURATE Act''. SEC. 2. COMMISSION ON HAZARD RISK ASSESSMENT TOOLS. (a) Establishment.--Not later than 180 days after the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology shall establish a commission to be known as the ``Commission on Hazard Risk Assessment Tools'' (in this section referred to as the ``Commission''). The Commission shall serve in an advisory capacity and provide recommendations to the Under Secretary. (b) Duties.--The duties of the Commission include the following: (1) Identify hazard risk assessment tools and models needed and procured by Federal Departments and agencies, including-- (A) hazard maps; (B) flood maps; (C) return period maps; (D) hazard scores; (E) hazard ratings; and (F) risk scores. (2) Identify the sources of key data inputs and parameters used in the development of hazard risk assessment tools and models including-- (A) data related to the frequency and severity of natural hazards; (B) scientific data related to how the frequency and severity of natural hazard affect, influence, shape risks and offsets of the built environment described in paragraph (C) and (D); (C) data related to inventories of the built environment, including buildings and infrastructure; (D) data related to natural hazard exposures and vulnerabilities of built environments including infrastructure, economic activity and human populations; and (E) data related to the adaptation and hazard mitigation practices used to offset the risk to and impact of natural hazard exposures and vulnerabilities of built environments. (3) Develop and submit to the Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology recommended standards and specifications required to validate the quality control of hazard risk assessment tools and models described in subsection (1). Such standards and specifications shall address-- (A) The data inputs and parameters described in subsection (2); (B) Model assumptions; and (C) Validation of model outputs. (4) Develop and submit to the Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology recommended standardized methodologies and protocols for the collection, validation, and analysis of the key data inputs and parameters identified in subsection (3). (5) Catalogue the quality, reliability, usability, timeliness, accuracy, consistency, and transparency needs for hazard risk assessment tools and models used by Federal departments and agencies that currently procure or utilize such tools, as determined by the Commission. (6) Make recommendations to the Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology regarding best practices for Federal departments and agencies for procurement of hazard risk assessment tools regarding the quality, reliability, usability, timeliness, accuracy, consistency, and transparency of hazard risk assessment tools and models. Such recommendations shall include an evaluation of the Federal Acquisition Regulations pertinent to such Federal departments and agencies to determine whether the current requirements should be updated based upon the recommended best practices guidance for the procurement of hazard risk assessment tools. (7) Review and action.-- (A) Not later than 180 days after receiving recommendations from the Commission under this subsection, the Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology shall review such recommendations and determine whether to adopt, modify, or decline such standards, methodologies, or best practices. (B) The Under Secretary for Standards and Technology may issue guidance, standards, or other appropriate directives for use by Federal departments and agencies based on such determinations. (c) Membership.-- (1) In general.--The Commission shall be comprised of representatives from each of the following categories. (A) A Federal department or agency responsible for modeling natural hazards. (B) A state or local emergency response organization. (C) FEMA. (D) A state regulatory agency that utilizes or procures hazard risk assessment tools or models. (E) A Federal department or agency that utilizes or procures hazard risk assessment tools or models. (F) A non-governmental organization or national association representing rural communities. (G) A non-governmental organization or national association representing urban communities. (H) Insurance industry. (I) Banking industry. (J) Public utility industry. (K) Construction industry. (L) Real estate industry. (M) Transportation/logistics. (N) Risk management consultant/professional. (O) Structural engineering. (P) Institute of higher education (as such term is defined in Section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001)) conducting research on hazard risk assessment tools or modeling. (Q) Institute of higher education utilizing artificial intelligence (as such term is described in the National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Act of 2020 (15 U.S.C 9401)) to improve hazard risk assessment tools or models. (2) Chairperson.--The Commission shall be chaired by the Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology or their designee. (3) Appointment.--The Chairperson of the Commission shall appoint the members to satisfy the representational requirements described in paragraph (1). (4) Expertise.--Every member of the Commission appointed shall all have expertise in at least one of the following categories: (A) Emergency management or response. (B) Utilization or procurement of hazard risk assessment products or models. (C) Modeling of natural hazards. (D) Community planning. (E) Structural engineering with respect to natural hazards. (F) Research of hazard risk assessment products or models. (G) Utilizing artificial intelligence to improve hazard risk assessment products or models. (5) Balance.--When appointing the members of the Committee, the Chairperson shall ensure at least one person with each of the expertise described in paragraph (4) is represented. (6) Vacancies.--Within 30 days of a vacancy on the Commission occurring, the Chairperson shall fill such vacancy from the same category that created the vacancy and satisfied the requirements described in this section. (d) Conflict of Interest, Disclosure, and Recusal.-- (1) Conflict of interest reporting.--A member of the Commission who is not designated a Special Government Employee (SGE) shall disclose to the Chairpersons any real or potential conflict of interest if such member has a direct financial interest in any hazard risk assessment tools, model, or modeling provider that is subject to review or validation through the standards and specifications established in subsection (b)(2). (2) SGE.--A member of the Commission designated as a special government employee shall be subject to applicable laws as delineated under 18 USC 201 et Seq, Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch. (3) Disclosure protocols.--A member of the Commission disclosing a conflict of interest in subsection (d)(1) shall submit a written report to the Commission to disclose the following: (A) Direct financial interest. (B) Affiliations with entities that have a direct financial interest. (C) Close relative or family member that have a direct financial interest. (4) Timing of disclosure.--Disclosure of conflict interest under subsection (1) shall occur before any meeting in which any hazard risk assessment tools, model or modeling provider is reviewed or validated. (5) Recusal.--Any member with a conflict described in subsection (2) shall seek recusal from participation in deliberations, decisions, or votes related to the review that presents the conflict. (e) Reports.--The Commission shall submit to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate. (1) A report not later than 9 months after the convening of the Commission that includes the following: (A) A catalogue of public and private sector sources of hazard risk assessment tools. (B) An assessment of the extent to which Federal departments and agencies utilize or purchase hazard risk assessment tools or models produced by the private sector. (C) A list of the key inputs and parameters to hazard risk assessment tools. (2) A report not later than 9 months after the submission of the report in subsection (1) that includes the results of the Commission's duties outlined in section (b). (3) A report not later than 18 months submission of the report in subsection (2) that includes the following: (A) An analysis of the results of the Commission's duties listed under section (b) regarding the efficacy of the standards and specifications in improving the quality of the hazard risk assessment tools available. (B) The identification of any standards or specifications that improve the quality of the hazard risk assessment tools available or any hazard risk assessment tool that has not yet been subject to the standards and specifications. (C) Recommendations to address the deficiencies in existing standards and specifications and how to set standards and specifications for tools that did not fall under the purview of the original standards and specifications. (f) Utilization of Hazard Risk Assessment Tools and Models.-- (1) Conditional application.--If the Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology adopts standards, methodologies, or guidance pursuant to subsection (b), Federal departments and agencies identified by the Commission shall, to the maximum extent practicable, incorporate such standards and guidance when procuring or utilizing hazard risk assessment tools and models from the private sector. (2) Documentation.--(A) The purveyor of hazard risk assessment tools and models purchased in paragraph (1) shall document for Federal agencies, and provide such documentation, how such hazard risk assessment tools and models conform to the standards and specifications adopted or issued by the Under Secretary of Commerce under subsection (b). In order to qualify to sell hazard risk assessment tools and models that have undergone a material change to Federal departments and agencies, the purveyor shall document, and provide such documentation, of how the changed hazard risk assessment tools and models conform to the standards and specifications adopted or issued by the Under Secretary of Commerce under subsection (b)(7). (3) Limited exceptions.--Notwithstanding paragraph (1), a Federal department or agency may procure or utilize hazard risk assessment tools or models that do not incorporate standards or guidance issued under this subsection if: (A) the Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology has not issued applicable standards or guidance for the specific use case; or (B) such procurement or use is necessary to respond to a national emergency. (4) Notification.--If a Federal department or agency relies on paragraph (3)(B), the agency shall, not later than 30 days after such use, notify the appropriate congressional committees and provide a brief justification, as well as what steps the agency has taken to ensure that such a purchase or utilization does not recur. (g) Sunset.--The Commission terminates 5 years after the enactment of this Act. (h) Definitions.--In this Act: (1) Built environment.--The term ``built environment'' means any man-made or modified structures, including associated infrastructure, that provide people with living, working, and recreational spaces. (2) Hazard risk.--The term ``hazard risk'' means the exposure of people, property, infrastructure, or economic activity to loss or disruption resulting from variations in natural hazards over a time period of at least one year. (3) Hazard risk assessment tools.--The term ``hazard risk assessment tools'' means products developed using hazard risk information to create output including-- (A) hazard maps; (B) flood maps; (C) return period maps; (D) hazard scores; (E) hazard ratings; and (F) risk scores. (4) Natural hazards.--The term ``natural hazards'' means extreme weather, water, or seismic events, including wildfire, drought, flooding, damaging winds, tornadoes, precipitation, earthquakes, and other natural phenomena, that have a high risk of loss of life or property. (5) Material change.--The term ``material change'' means a model version update that changes underlying input data, methodology, or assumptions, or updates losses or categorization of properties or areas by more than ten percent. <all>\n\nSUMMARY TO EVALUATE:\nTitle: ACCURATE Act: Improving Natural Hazard Risk Assessment and Mapping Standards.\nSummary: This act creates a commission to set quality standards for tools that predict risks like floods and wildfires. It aims to ensure that the maps and data used by the government and industries are accurate, consistent, and reliable for citizens.\nKey Points: Establishment of a commission to standardize hazard maps, flood ratings, and risk scores., Requirement for federal agencies to use validated and high-quality risk assessment tools., Involvement of experts from insurance, banking, and construction to ensure practical and accurate data., Improved transparency in how natural disaster risks are calculated for homes and infrastructure.\n\nZASADY OCENY:\n1. Sprawdź wszystkie LICZBY, DATY i KWOTY w SUMMARY. Jeśli którejś brakuje w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n2. Sprawdź wszystkie NAZWISKA, ORGANIZACJE i MIEJSCA w SUMMARY. Jeśli którejś brakuje w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n3. Sprawdź wszystkie konkretne DZIAŁANIA PRAWNE . Jeśli tego mechanizmu nie ma w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n\nWAŻNE: Abstrakcyjne pojęcia (np. \"transparentność\", \"zaufanie\") są dozwolone jako wnioski.\n\nOUTPUT (JSON):\n{\n  \"is_valid\": true/false,\n  \"issue\": \"fabricated_entity\" / \"contradiction\" / \"none\"\n}\n\nWYMAGANIA FORMATOWANIA:\n1. Odpowiedz WYŁĄCZNIE surowym obiektem JSON.\n2. NIE używaj bloków kodu Markdown.\n3. NIE dodawaj żadnych wstępów ani wyjaśnień przed ani po JSONie.\n4. JSON musi być poprawny i gotowy do parsowania.\n\n",
      "ai_response_raw": "{\n  \"is_valid\": true,\n  \"issue\": \"none\"\n}"
    },
    {
      "timestamp": "2026-04-28T11:13:41.991Z",
      "source_url": "https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/hr8407/BILLS-119hr8407ih.htm",
      "model": "gemini-flash-latest",
      "prompt_sent": "\nJesteś ekspertem od prawa Stanów Zjednoczonych, który ma za zadanie analizować dokumenty ustaw, uchwał oraz innych dokumentów legislacyjnych, a następnie przygotowywać z nich informacje w przystępny sposób dla obywateli. Twoim celem jest przedstawienie informacji tak, aby obywatele mogli sami ocenić wpływ legislacji na ich życie, nawet bez posiadania specjalistycznej wiedzy legislacyjnej. Skup się na faktach i obiektywnych skutkach wprowadzanych zmian, unikając wartościowania i osobistych opinii. Wszelki żargon prawny jest zabroniony. Prezentuj informacje w jasny, zwięzły i angażujący sposób, tak aby były zrozumiałe dla osoby bez wykształcenia prawniczego. Unikaj długich, złożonych zdań. Zamiast pisać \"projekt ma na celu nowelizację kodeksu podatkowego...\", napisz \"Zmiany w podatkach: nowe ulgi i obowiązki dla...\". Kontynuuj swoją pracę, dopóki nie rozwiążesz swojego zadania. Jeśli nie masz pewności co do generowanej treści, przeanalizuj dokument ponownie – nie zgaduj. Rozplanuj dobrze swoje zadanie przed przystąpieniem do niego. W podsumowaniu i kluczowych punktach, jeśli to możliwe i uzasadnione, podkreśl, jakie konkretne korzyści lub skutki (pozytywne lub negatywne) wprowadza ustawa dla życia codziennego obywateli, ich praw i obowiązków, finansów osobistych, bezpieczeństwa i innych ważnych kwestii (np. kategorycznych zakazów i nakazów czy najważniejszych konkretnych alokacji finansowych i terytorialnych).\n\nTwoja odpowiedź MUSI być w formacie JSON - i zawierać następujące klucze.\nZanim zwrócisz odpowiedź, dokładnie zweryfikuj, czy cała struktura JSON jest w 100% poprawna, włącznie ze wszystkimi przecinkami, nawiasami klamrowymi, kwadratowymi oraz cudzysłowami. Błędny JSON jest nieakceptowalny i uniemożliwi przetworzenie Twojej pracy.\n\nPrzeanalizuj dokładnie poniższy tekst dokumentu prawnego. To jest treść, na podstawie której masz wygenerować podsumowanie i kluczowe punkty:\n--- POCZĄTEK DOKUMENTU ---\n[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.R. 8407 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 8407 To direct the Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology to establish a Commission on Hazard Risk Assessment Tools, and for other purposes. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 21, 2026 Mr. Scott Franklin of Florida (for himself, Mr. Amo, and Mr. Miller of Ohio) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To direct the Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology to establish a Commission on Hazard Risk Assessment Tools, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Advancing Consistent and Credible Use of Risk Assessment Tools and Evaluation Act'' or the ``ACCURATE Act''. SEC. 2. COMMISSION ON HAZARD RISK ASSESSMENT TOOLS. (a) Establishment.--Not later than 180 days after the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology shall establish a commission to be known as the ``Commission on Hazard Risk Assessment Tools'' (in this section referred to as the ``Commission''). The Commission shall serve in an advisory capacity and provide recommendations to the Under Secretary. (b) Duties.--The duties of the Commission include the following: (1) Identify hazard risk assessment tools and models needed and procured by Federal Departments and agencies, including-- (A) hazard maps; (B) flood maps; (C) return period maps; (D) hazard scores; (E) hazard ratings; and (F) risk scores. (2) Identify the sources of key data inputs and parameters used in the development of hazard risk assessment tools and models including-- (A) data related to the frequency and severity of natural hazards; (B) scientific data related to how the frequency and severity of natural hazard affect, influence, shape risks and offsets of the built environment described in paragraph (C) and (D); (C) data related to inventories of the built environment, including buildings and infrastructure; (D) data related to natural hazard exposures and vulnerabilities of built environments including infrastructure, economic activity and human populations; and (E) data related to the adaptation and hazard mitigation practices used to offset the risk to and impact of natural hazard exposures and vulnerabilities of built environments. (3) Develop and submit to the Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology recommended standards and specifications required to validate the quality control of hazard risk assessment tools and models described in subsection (1). Such standards and specifications shall address-- (A) The data inputs and parameters described in subsection (2); (B) Model assumptions; and (C) Validation of model outputs. (4) Develop and submit to the Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology recommended standardized methodologies and protocols for the collection, validation, and analysis of the key data inputs and parameters identified in subsection (3). (5) Catalogue the quality, reliability, usability, timeliness, accuracy, consistency, and transparency needs for hazard risk assessment tools and models used by Federal departments and agencies that currently procure or utilize such tools, as determined by the Commission. (6) Make recommendations to the Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology regarding best practices for Federal departments and agencies for procurement of hazard risk assessment tools regarding the quality, reliability, usability, timeliness, accuracy, consistency, and transparency of hazard risk assessment tools and models. Such recommendations shall include an evaluation of the Federal Acquisition Regulations pertinent to such Federal departments and agencies to determine whether the current requirements should be updated based upon the recommended best practices guidance for the procurement of hazard risk assessment tools. (7) Review and action.-- (A) Not later than 180 days after receiving recommendations from the Commission under this subsection, the Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology shall review such recommendations and determine whether to adopt, modify, or decline such standards, methodologies, or best practices. (B) The Under Secretary for Standards and Technology may issue guidance, standards, or other appropriate directives for use by Federal departments and agencies based on such determinations. (c) Membership.-- (1) In general.--The Commission shall be comprised of representatives from each of the following categories. (A) A Federal department or agency responsible for modeling natural hazards. (B) A state or local emergency response organization. (C) FEMA. (D) A state regulatory agency that utilizes or procures hazard risk assessment tools or models. (E) A Federal department or agency that utilizes or procures hazard risk assessment tools or models. (F) A non-governmental organization or national association representing rural communities. (G) A non-governmental organization or national association representing urban communities. (H) Insurance industry. (I) Banking industry. (J) Public utility industry. (K) Construction industry. (L) Real estate industry. (M) Transportation/logistics. (N) Risk management consultant/professional. (O) Structural engineering. (P) Institute of higher education (as such term is defined in Section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001)) conducting research on hazard risk assessment tools or modeling. (Q) Institute of higher education utilizing artificial intelligence (as such term is described in the National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Act of 2020 (15 U.S.C 9401)) to improve hazard risk assessment tools or models. (2) Chairperson.--The Commission shall be chaired by the Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology or their designee. (3) Appointment.--The Chairperson of the Commission shall appoint the members to satisfy the representational requirements described in paragraph (1). (4) Expertise.--Every member of the Commission appointed shall all have expertise in at least one of the following categories: (A) Emergency management or response. (B) Utilization or procurement of hazard risk assessment products or models. (C) Modeling of natural hazards. (D) Community planning. (E) Structural engineering with respect to natural hazards. (F) Research of hazard risk assessment products or models. (G) Utilizing artificial intelligence to improve hazard risk assessment products or models. (5) Balance.--When appointing the members of the Committee, the Chairperson shall ensure at least one person with each of the expertise described in paragraph (4) is represented. (6) Vacancies.--Within 30 days of a vacancy on the Commission occurring, the Chairperson shall fill such vacancy from the same category that created the vacancy and satisfied the requirements described in this section. (d) Conflict of Interest, Disclosure, and Recusal.-- (1) Conflict of interest reporting.--A member of the Commission who is not designated a Special Government Employee (SGE) shall disclose to the Chairpersons any real or potential conflict of interest if such member has a direct financial interest in any hazard risk assessment tools, model, or modeling provider that is subject to review or validation through the standards and specifications established in subsection (b)(2). (2) SGE.--A member of the Commission designated as a special government employee shall be subject to applicable laws as delineated under 18 USC 201 et Seq, Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch. (3) Disclosure protocols.--A member of the Commission disclosing a conflict of interest in subsection (d)(1) shall submit a written report to the Commission to disclose the following: (A) Direct financial interest. (B) Affiliations with entities that have a direct financial interest. (C) Close relative or family member that have a direct financial interest. (4) Timing of disclosure.--Disclosure of conflict interest under subsection (1) shall occur before any meeting in which any hazard risk assessment tools, model or modeling provider is reviewed or validated. (5) Recusal.--Any member with a conflict described in subsection (2) shall seek recusal from participation in deliberations, decisions, or votes related to the review that presents the conflict. (e) Reports.--The Commission shall submit to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate. (1) A report not later than 9 months after the convening of the Commission that includes the following: (A) A catalogue of public and private sector sources of hazard risk assessment tools. (B) An assessment of the extent to which Federal departments and agencies utilize or purchase hazard risk assessment tools or models produced by the private sector. (C) A list of the key inputs and parameters to hazard risk assessment tools. (2) A report not later than 9 months after the submission of the report in subsection (1) that includes the results of the Commission's duties outlined in section (b). (3) A report not later than 18 months submission of the report in subsection (2) that includes the following: (A) An analysis of the results of the Commission's duties listed under section (b) regarding the efficacy of the standards and specifications in improving the quality of the hazard risk assessment tools available. (B) The identification of any standards or specifications that improve the quality of the hazard risk assessment tools available or any hazard risk assessment tool that has not yet been subject to the standards and specifications. (C) Recommendations to address the deficiencies in existing standards and specifications and how to set standards and specifications for tools that did not fall under the purview of the original standards and specifications. (f) Utilization of Hazard Risk Assessment Tools and Models.-- (1) Conditional application.--If the Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology adopts standards, methodologies, or guidance pursuant to subsection (b), Federal departments and agencies identified by the Commission shall, to the maximum extent practicable, incorporate such standards and guidance when procuring or utilizing hazard risk assessment tools and models from the private sector. (2) Documentation.--(A) The purveyor of hazard risk assessment tools and models purchased in paragraph (1) shall document for Federal agencies, and provide such documentation, how such hazard risk assessment tools and models conform to the standards and specifications adopted or issued by the Under Secretary of Commerce under subsection (b). In order to qualify to sell hazard risk assessment tools and models that have undergone a material change to Federal departments and agencies, the purveyor shall document, and provide such documentation, of how the changed hazard risk assessment tools and models conform to the standards and specifications adopted or issued by the Under Secretary of Commerce under subsection (b)(7). (3) Limited exceptions.--Notwithstanding paragraph (1), a Federal department or agency may procure or utilize hazard risk assessment tools or models that do not incorporate standards or guidance issued under this subsection if: (A) the Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology has not issued applicable standards or guidance for the specific use case; or (B) such procurement or use is necessary to respond to a national emergency. (4) Notification.--If a Federal department or agency relies on paragraph (3)(B), the agency shall, not later than 30 days after such use, notify the appropriate congressional committees and provide a brief justification, as well as what steps the agency has taken to ensure that such a purchase or utilization does not recur. (g) Sunset.--The Commission terminates 5 years after the enactment of this Act. (h) Definitions.--In this Act: (1) Built environment.--The term ``built environment'' means any man-made or modified structures, including associated infrastructure, that provide people with living, working, and recreational spaces. (2) Hazard risk.--The term ``hazard risk'' means the exposure of people, property, infrastructure, or economic activity to loss or disruption resulting from variations in natural hazards over a time period of at least one year. (3) Hazard risk assessment tools.--The term ``hazard risk assessment tools'' means products developed using hazard risk information to create output including-- (A) hazard maps; (B) flood maps; (C) return period maps; (D) hazard scores; (E) hazard ratings; and (F) risk scores. (4) Natural hazards.--The term ``natural hazards'' means extreme weather, water, or seismic events, including wildfire, drought, flooding, damaging winds, tornadoes, precipitation, earthquakes, and other natural phenomena, that have a high risk of loss of life or property. (5) Material change.--The term ``material change'' means a model version update that changes underlying input data, methodology, or assumptions, or updates losses or categorization of properties or areas by more than ten percent. <all>\n--- KONIEC DOKUMENTU ---\n\nPAMIĘTAJ: Twoja odpowiedź MUSI być wyłącznie poprawnym obiektem JSON. Nie dodawaj żadnych dodatkowych znaków, komentarzy ani tekstu przed znacznikiem '{' ani po znaczniku '}'. Cała odpowiedź musi być parsowalna jako JSON.\nNa podstawie POWYŻSZEGO dokumentu, wypełnij poniższą strukturę JSON:\nOto struktura JSON, której oczekuję (wypełnij ją treścią):\n{\n  \"pl_ai_title\": \"Nowy, krótki tytuł dla aktu prawnego po polsku, oddający sedno wprowadzanych zmian (np. maksymalnie 10-12 słów).\",\n  \"pl_summary\": \"2-3 zdania zwięzłego podsumowania treści aktu prawnego po polsku, napisane z perspektywy wpływu na życie codzienne obywateli.\",\n  \"pl_key_points\": [\n    \"Pierwszy krótki punkt po polsku dotyczący najważniejszych wprowadzanych rozwiązań lub zmian.\",\n    \"Drugi krótki punkt po polsku...\"\n  ],\n  \"eng_ai_title\": \"A new, short title for the legal act in English, capturing the essence of the changes (e.g., max 10-12 words).\",\n  \"eng_summary\": \"2-3 sentences summarizing the legal act in English, from the perspective of its impact on citizens' daily lives.\",\n  \"eng_key_points\": [\n    \"First short bullet point in English regarding the most important solutions or changes being introduced.\",\n    \"Second short bullet point in English...\"\n  ],\n  \"de_ai_title\": \"Ein neuer, kurzer Titel für das Rechtsdokument auf Deutsch, der den Kern der Änderungen erfasst (z.B. max. 10-12 Wörter).\",\n  \"de_summary\": \"2-3 Sätze Zusammenfassung des Rechtsdokuments auf Deutsch, aus der Perspektive seiner Auswirkungen auf das tägliche Leben der Bürger.\",\n  \"de_key_points\": [\n    \"Erster kurzer Stichpunkt auf Deutsch zu den wichtigsten eingeführten Lösungen oder Änderungen.\",\n    \"Zweiter kurzer Stichpunkt auf Deutsch...\"\n  ],\n  \"fr_ai_title\": \"Un nouveau titre court pour l'acte juridique en français, saisissant l'essence des changements (par exemple, 10-12 mots maximum).\",\n  \"fr_summary\": \"Résumé de 2-3 phrases de l'acte juridique en français, du point de vue de son impact sur la vie quotidienne des citoyens.\",\n  \"fr_key_points\": [\n    \"Premier court point en français concernant les solutions ou changements les plus importants introduits.\",\n    \"Deuxième court point en français...\"\n  ],\n  \"es_ai_title\": \"Un nuevo título breve para el acto jurídico en español, que recoja la esencia de los cambios (por ejemplo, máximo 10-12 palabras).\",\n  \"es_summary\": \"Resumen de 2-3 frases del acto jurídico en español, desde la perspectiva de su impacto en la vida cotidiana de los ciudadanos.\",\n  \"es_key_points\": [\n    \"Primer punto breve en español sobre las soluciones o cambios más importantes que se introducen.\",\n    \"Segundo punto breve en español...\"\n  ],\n  \"it_ai_title\": \"Un nuovo titolo breve per l'atto giuridico in italiano, che colga l'essenza delle modifiche (ad es. massimo 10-12 parole).\",\n  \"it_summary\": \"Riepilogo di 2-3 frasi dell'atto giuridico in italiano, dal punto di vista del suo impatto sulla vita quotidiana dei cittadini.\",\n  \"it_key_points\": [\n    \"Primo breve punto in italiano riguardante le soluzioni o le modifiche più importanti introdotte.\",\n    \"Secondo breve punto in italiano...\"\n  ],\n  \"nl_ai_title\": \"Een nieuwe, korte titel voor de rechtshandeling in het Nederlands, die de essentie van de wijzigingen weergeeft (bijv. max. 10-12 woorden).\",\n  \"nl_summary\": \"Samenvatting van 2-3 zinnen van de rechtshandeling in het Nederlands, vanuit het perspectief van de impact op het dagelijks leven van burgers.\",\n  \"nl_key_points\": [\n    \"Eerste korte punt in het Nederlands betreffende de belangrijkste geïntroduceerde oplossingen of wijzigingen.\",\n    \"Tweede korte punt in het Nederlands...\"\n  ],\n  \"pt_ai_title\": \"Um novo título curto para o ato jurídico em português, capturando a essência das mudanças (por exemplo, máx. 10-12 palavras).\",\n  \"pt_summary\": \"Resumo de 2-3 frases do ato jurídico em português, na perspetiva do seu impacto na vida quotidiana dos cidadãos.\",\n  \"pt_key_points\": [\n    \"Primeiro ponto curto em português sobre as soluções ou alterações mais importantes introduzidas.\",\n    \"Segundo ponto curto em português...\"\n  ],\n  \"category\": [\"Categorize the document into one category by default, based on the field it primarily concerns. Choose up to 3 if the document also touches upon SIGNIFICANT issues from other categories. You MUST select categories ONLY from the following list: Health, Education, Family, Taxes, Labor, Security, Environment, Courts and Law, Transport, Benefits, Real Estate, Media and Culture, Local Government, Migration, Agriculture, Public Investments, Informatization, Economy. If the document does not definitively fit any of these, you MUST use \"Other\". If you use \"Other\", it should be the ONLY category selected. Do NOT invent new categories. The response must be an array of strings, e.g., [\"Taxes\", \"Family\"].\"]\n}\n\n",
      "ai_response_raw": "{\n  \"pl_ai_title\": \"Ustawa ACCURATE: Lepsza ocena ryzyka klęsk żywiołowych i wiarygodne mapy zagrożeń.\",\n  \"pl_summary\": \"Ustawa powołuje specjalną komisję, która opracuje standardy dla narzędzi oceniających ryzyko powodzi, pożarów i innych katastrof. Dzięki temu obywatele i instytucje będą korzystać z bardziej dokładnych i przejrzystych map oraz prognoz zagrożeń.\",\n  \"pl_key_points\": [\n    \"Powstanie komisji ekspertów z różnych branż (ubezpieczenia, budownictwo, nauka) w celu poprawy jakości map zagrożeń.\",\n    \"Wprowadzenie jednolitych standardów dla narzędzi oceniających ryzyko powodziowe i pogodowe używanych przez rząd.\",\n    \"Zwiększenie przejrzystości danych, na podstawie których wyliczane są składki ubezpieczeniowe i oceny bezpieczeństwa budynków.\",\n    \"Obowiązek stosowania sprawdzonych i wiarygodnych modeli ryzyka przez agencje federalne przy zakupach od firm prywatnych.\"\n  ],\n  \"eng_ai_title\": \"ACCURATE Act: Improving Natural Hazard Risk Assessment and Mapping Standards.\",\n  \"eng_summary\": \"This act creates a commission to set quality standards for tools that predict risks like floods and wildfires. It aims to ensure that the maps and data used by the government and industries are accurate, consistent, and reliable for citizens.\",\n  \"eng_key_points\": [\n    \"Establishment of a commission to standardize hazard maps, flood ratings, and risk scores.\",\n    \"Requirement for federal agencies to use validated and high-quality risk assessment tools.\",\n    \"Involvement of experts from insurance, banking, and construction to ensure practical and accurate data.\",\n    \"Improved transparency in how natural disaster risks are calculated for homes and infrastructure.\"\n  ],\n  \"de_ai_title\": \"ACCURATE-Gesetz: Bessere Standards für die Bewertung von Naturgefahren und Risikokarten.\",\n  \"de_summary\": \"Dieses Gesetz führt eine Kommission ein, die Qualitätsstandards für Werkzeuge zur Vorhersage von Risiken wie Überschwemmungen und Waldbränden festlegt. Ziel ist es, dass Bürger und Behörden auf genauere und transparentere Gefahrenkarten zugreifen können.\",\n  \"de_key_points\": [\n    \"Gründung einer Expertenkommission zur Standardisierung von Hochwasserkarten und Risikobewertungen.\",\n    \"Bundesbehörden müssen beim Kauf von Risikomodellen strengere Qualitätsvorgaben einhalten.\",\n    \"Einbeziehung von Fachleuten aus Versicherungen und Bauwesen für praxisnahe Daten.\",\n    \"Höhere Genauigkeit bei der Berechnung von Katastrophenrisiken für Immobilien und Infrastruktur.\"\n  ],\n  \"fr_ai_title\": \"Loi ACCURATE : Amélioration des normes d'évaluation des risques naturels et de cartographie.\",\n  \"fr_summary\": \"Cette loi crée une commission chargée de définir des normes de qualité pour les outils prédisant les risques tels que les inondations et les incendies. Elle vise à garantir que les cartes et les données utilisées par le gouvernement sont précises et fiables pour les citoyens.\",\n  \"fr_key_points\": [\n    \"Création d'une commission pour standardiser les cartes d'aléas et les scores de risque.\",\n    \"Obligation pour les agences fédérales d'utiliser des outils d'évaluation des risques validés et de haute qualité.\",\n    \"Participation d'experts des secteurs de l'assurance et de la construction pour des données plus fiables.\",\n    \"Plus de transparence dans le calcul des risques de catastrophes naturelles pour les habitations.\"\n  ],\n  \"es_ai_title\": \"Ley ACCURATE: Mejora de los estándares de evaluación de riesgos naturales y mapas.\",\n  \"es_summary\": \"Esta ley crea una comisión para establecer estándares de calidad en las herramientas que predicen riesgos como inundaciones e incendios. El objetivo es asegurar que los mapas y datos usados por el gobierno sean precisos y confiables para los ciudadanos.\",\n  \"es_key_points\": [\n    \"Creación de una comisión para estandarizar mapas de inundaciones y calificaciones de riesgo.\",\n    \"Requisito para que las agencias federales usen herramientas de evaluación de riesgos validadas.\",\n    \"Participación de expertos en seguros y construcción para garantizar datos precisos.\",\n    \"Mayor transparencia en cómo se calculan los riesgos de desastres naturales para las viviendas.\"\n  ],\n  \"it_ai_title\": \"Legge ACCURATE: Miglioramento degli standard per la valutazione dei rischi naturali.\",\n  \"it_summary\": \"Questa legge istituisce una commissione per definire standard di qualità per gli strumenti che prevedono rischi come inondazioni e incendi. L'obiettivo è garantire che le mappe e i dati utilizzati dal governo siano accurati e affidabili per i cittadini.\",\n  \"it_key_points\": [\n    \"Istituzione di una commissione per standardizzare le mappe dei pericoli e i punteggi di rischio.\",\n    \"Obbligo per le agenzie federali di utilizzare strumenti di valutazione del rischio validati.\",\n    \"Coinvolgimento di esperti del settore assicurativo e dell'edilizia per dati più precisi.\",\n    \"Maggiore trasparenza nel calcolo dei rischi di catastrofi naturali per case e infrastrutture.\"\n  ],\n  \"nl_ai_title\": \"ACCURATE-wet: Verbetering van normen voor risicobeoordeling van natuurrampen.\",\n  \"nl_summary\": \"Deze wet stelt een commissie in om kwaliteitsnormen te bepalen voor instrumenten die risico's zoals overstromingen en bosbranden voorspellen. Het doel is om te zorgen dat kaarten en gegevens die de overheid gebruikt nauwkeurig en betrouwbaar zijn voor burgers.\",\n  \"nl_key_points\": [\n    \"Oprichting van een commissie om overstromingskaarten en risicoscores te standaardiseren.\",\n    \"Federale agentschappen moeten gevalideerde en hoogwaardige risicobeoordelingsinstrumenten gebruiken.\",\n    \"Betrokkenheid van experts uit de verzekerings- en bouwsector voor nauwkeurige gegevens.\",\n    \"Betere transparantie in de berekening van natuurramprisico's voor woningen en infrastructuur.\"\n  ],\n  \"pt_ai_title\": \"Lei ACCURATE: Melhoria dos padrões de avaliação de riscos naturais e mapeamento.\",\n  \"pt_summary\": \"Esta lei cria uma comissão para definir padrões de qualidade para ferramentas que preveem riscos como inundações e incêndios. O objetivo é garantir que os mapas e dados usados pelo governo sejam precisos e confiáveis para os cidadãos.\",\n  \"pt_key_points\": [\n    \"Criação de uma comissão para padronizar mapas de perigo e pontuações de risco.\",\n    \"Exigência de que as agências federais utilizem ferramentas de avaliação de risco validadas.\",\n    \"Envolvimento de especialistas em seguros e construção para garantir dados precisos.\",\n    \"Maior transparência no cálculo dos riscos de desastres naturais para habitações e infraestruturas.\"\n  ],\n  \"category\": [\n    \"Environment\",\n    \"Security\",\n    \"Real Estate\"\n  ]\n}"
    }
  ]
}