{
  "legislationId": "119_HR_8470",
  "lastUpdate": "2026-04-24T11:17:52.802Z",
  "history": [
    {
      "timestamp": "2026-04-24T11:17:52.802Z",
      "source_url": "https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/hr8470/BILLS-119hr8470ih.htm",
      "model": "gemini-flash-lite-latest",
      "prompt_sent": "\nROLE: Fact Checker.\nZADANIE: Porównaj SOURCE (oryginał) i SUMMARY (streszczenie przygotowane przez inne AI).\n\nTwoim celem jest wykrycie \"ZMYŚLONYCH KONKRETÓW\" (Fabricated Entities) w SUMMARY.\n\nSOURCE:\n[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.R. 8470 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 8470 To amend title 18, United States Code, to ensure that all searches that significantly impinge on the privacy or security of a person require a warrant based on probable cause, to provide a right of action for violations of Fourth Amendment rights, and for other purposes. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 23, 2026 Mr. Massie (for himself and Ms. Boebert) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To amend title 18, United States Code, to ensure that all searches that significantly impinge on the privacy or security of a person require a warrant based on probable cause, to provide a right of action for violations of Fourth Amendment rights, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Surveillance Accountability Act''. SEC. 2. WARRANT REQUIREMENT FOR SEARCHES. (a) In General.--Chapter 205 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section: ``Sec. 3119. Searches to accord with the Fourth Amendment ``(a) Warrant Requirement.-- ``(1) In general.--Except as provided in subsection (b), no search may be conducted without a warrant issued by a neutral and detached magistrate upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized. ``(2) Third-party data.-- ``(A) Presumption of privacy.--The government shall not access any data, metadata, or personal information held by a third party, including financial services providers, telecommunication service providers, internet service providers, cloud storage companies, or data brokers, without a valid warrant, regardless of whether the third party consents or cooperates. ``(B) Exception invalidated.--No contractual agreement between a user and a third party may be interpreted as waiving the government's warrant requirement for access to the data of that user, unless such waiver is knowing, voluntary, and explicit. ``(b) Exceptions.--The following may be conducted without a warrant: ``(1) Plain-view searches. ``(2) The verification of government-issued primary photo identification documents during a stop of a motor vehicle, travel, or other interactions with law enforcement, including the verification of-- ``(A) a State identification card; ``(B) a driver's license; ``(C) a passport; ``(D) a passport card; ``(E) a military identification; or ``(F) a permanent resident card. ``(3) The collection or analysis of information that is lawfully published or voluntarily made available by a person or entity to a public audience, and which requires no circumvention of privacy settings, encryption, or other access controls. ``(4) The use of lawful investigative techniques to collect data from publicly available sources such as new outlets, official government publications, public records, or user- posted content that is clearly accessible to the general public without special access or tools. ``(5) Searches conducted with consent. ``(6) Searched conducted under exigent circumstances. ``(c) Limitations.--The exceptions described in subsection (b) shall not be construed to permit the warrantless collection, retention, querying, or analysis of data exposed to public view or accessible to a third party if the person associated with the collected identifiers did not express informed and voluntary consent to such collection with respect to data gathered by entering a public place, operating a motor vehicle on a public roadway, or patronizing a private establishment open to the public, including-- ``(1) biometric data, including facial images, faceprints, gait, voice recognition, or other unique physical identifiers, obtained through facial recognition systems or comparable surveillance technologies; or ``(2) license plate images, vehicle metadata, or vehicle movement patterns obtained through automated license plate readers or similar systems. ``(d) Definitons.--In this section: ``(1) Search.--The term `search' means any government- initiated act that intrudes upon an individual's reasonable expectation of privacy, including the following: ``(A) Investigatory acts.--Any investigatory act purposefully directed at a specific person or entity, or the property of a specific person or entity, with the intent of obtaining information not otherwise available to the public. ``(B) Government surveillance and monitoring.--Any non-consensual surveillance, monitoring, or inquiry conducted by a government entity or its agents, whether through human, digital, or automated means, that collects information on a specific individual or entity, including information on that individual or entity's-- ``(i) communications; ``(ii) associations; ``(iii) employment; ``(iv) social media usage; ``(v) internet usage; ``(vi) financial transactions; or ``(vii) travel. ``(C) Collection of personal data.--The acquisition and analysis of any data, metadata, or information pertaining to a person's digital or physical life, including-- ``(i) geolocation; ``(ii) communication records; ``(iii) personal device activity; ``(iv) assets; ``(v) liabilities; ``(vi) biometric identifiers; ``(vii) behavioral signals data; or ``(viii) financial transactions. ``(2) Plain-view searches defined.--In this section, the term `plain-view searches' means the observation or seizure of evidence by a law enforcement officer who is lawfully present at a location, where the incriminating nature of the evidence is immediately apparent, and where such observation is incidental to the officer's lawful presence and does not involve the use of enhanced surveillance technology or systematic monitoring. ``(e) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section shall be construed to-- ``(1) modify, supersede, or limit any existing constitutional protection, or to authorize surveillance that would otherwise be unlawful; ``(2) eliminate or restrict constitutionally recognized exceptions permitting brief investigatory detentions or protective frisks based on reasonable suspicion; or ``(3) eliminate or restrict the authority of law enforcement officers to conduct brief investigatory detentions, protective frisks, arrests, or searches incident to ordinary criminal law enforcement encounters.''. (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for chapter 205 of title 18, United States Code, amended by adding at the end the following: ``3119. Searches to accord with the Fourth Amendment.''. SEC. 3. RIGHT OF ACTION FOR VIOLATIONS OF FOURTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS. (a) In General.--The Revised Statutes are amended by inserting after section 1979 the following: ``SEC. 1979A. DEPRIVATION OF FOURTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS. ``(a) In General.--Every person, including a Federal employee, who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of the United States, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or any person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Fourth Amendment, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress. ``(b) Attorney's Fees.--In any action, suit, or proceeding to enforce this Act, the court, in its discretion, may allow the prevailing party, other than the United States, a reasonable attorney's fee as part of the costs. ``(c) Federal Employee Defined.--In this section, the term `Federal employee' means an individual other than the President or the Vice President, who occupies a position in any agency or instrumentality of the executive branch (including any independent agency). ``(d) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section shall be construed to authorize a Federal employee to bring a suit against their Federal employer or the Federal Government for conduct that is within the scope of the employment relationship.''. (b) Severability.--If any provision of this Act or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of this Act, and the application of this Act, to any other person or circumstance, shall not be affected thereby. <all>\n\nSUMMARY TO EVALUATE:\nTitle: Surveillance Accountability Act: Strengthening Privacy and Warrant Requirements\nSummary: This Act requires the government to obtain a warrant before accessing citizen data held by third parties like banks or internet providers. It also allows individuals to sue federal employees for violating their constitutional privacy rights.\nKey Points: A warrant is required to access data held by ISPs, cloud storage, banks, and data brokers., Prohibits warrantless biometric surveillance and license plate tracking in public spaces., Creates a legal right for citizens to sue federal employees for Fourth Amendment violations., User agreements with third parties cannot be used as a blanket waiver of warrant requirements., Exceptions include emergency situations, explicit consent, and routine ID verification during stops.\n\nZASADY OCENY:\n1. Sprawdź wszystkie LICZBY, DATY i KWOTY w SUMMARY. Jeśli którejś brakuje w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n2. Sprawdź wszystkie NAZWISKA, ORGANIZACJE i MIEJSCA w SUMMARY. Jeśli którejś brakuje w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n3. Sprawdź wszystkie konkretne DZIAŁANIA PRAWNE . Jeśli tego mechanizmu nie ma w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n\nWAŻNE: Abstrakcyjne pojęcia (np. \"transparentność\", \"zaufanie\") są dozwolone jako wnioski.\n\nOUTPUT (JSON):\n{\n  \"is_valid\": true/false,\n  \"issue\": \"fabricated_entity\" / \"contradiction\" / \"none\"\n}\n\nWYMAGANIA FORMATOWANIA:\n1. Odpowiedz WYŁĄCZNIE surowym obiektem JSON.\n2. NIE używaj bloków kodu Markdown.\n3. NIE dodawaj żadnych wstępów ani wyjaśnień przed ani po JSONie.\n4. JSON musi być poprawny i gotowy do parsowania.\n\n",
      "ai_response_raw": "{\n  \"is_valid\": true,\n  \"issue\": \"none\"\n}"
    },
    {
      "timestamp": "2026-04-24T11:13:47.043Z",
      "source_url": "https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/hr8470/BILLS-119hr8470ih.htm",
      "model": "gemini-flash-latest",
      "prompt_sent": "\nJesteś ekspertem od prawa Stanów Zjednoczonych, który ma za zadanie analizować dokumenty ustaw, uchwał oraz innych dokumentów legislacyjnych, a następnie przygotowywać z nich informacje w przystępny sposób dla obywateli. Twoim celem jest przedstawienie informacji tak, aby obywatele mogli sami ocenić wpływ legislacji na ich życie, nawet bez posiadania specjalistycznej wiedzy legislacyjnej. Skup się na faktach i obiektywnych skutkach wprowadzanych zmian, unikając wartościowania i osobistych opinii. Wszelki żargon prawny jest zabroniony. Prezentuj informacje w jasny, zwięzły i angażujący sposób, tak aby były zrozumiałe dla osoby bez wykształcenia prawniczego. Unikaj długich, złożonych zdań. Zamiast pisać \"projekt ma na celu nowelizację kodeksu podatkowego...\", napisz \"Zmiany w podatkach: nowe ulgi i obowiązki dla...\". Kontynuuj swoją pracę, dopóki nie rozwiążesz swojego zadania. Jeśli nie masz pewności co do generowanej treści, przeanalizuj dokument ponownie – nie zgaduj. Rozplanuj dobrze swoje zadanie przed przystąpieniem do niego. W podsumowaniu i kluczowych punktach, jeśli to możliwe i uzasadnione, podkreśl, jakie konkretne korzyści lub skutki (pozytywne lub negatywne) wprowadza ustawa dla życia codziennego obywateli, ich praw i obowiązków, finansów osobistych, bezpieczeństwa i innych ważnych kwestii (np. kategorycznych zakazów i nakazów czy najważniejszych konkretnych alokacji finansowych i terytorialnych).\n\nTwoja odpowiedź MUSI być w formacie JSON - i zawierać następujące klucze.\nZanim zwrócisz odpowiedź, dokładnie zweryfikuj, czy cała struktura JSON jest w 100% poprawna, włącznie ze wszystkimi przecinkami, nawiasami klamrowymi, kwadratowymi oraz cudzysłowami. Błędny JSON jest nieakceptowalny i uniemożliwi przetworzenie Twojej pracy.\n\nPrzeanalizuj dokładnie poniższy tekst dokumentu prawnego. To jest treść, na podstawie której masz wygenerować podsumowanie i kluczowe punkty:\n--- POCZĄTEK DOKUMENTU ---\n[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.R. 8470 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 8470 To amend title 18, United States Code, to ensure that all searches that significantly impinge on the privacy or security of a person require a warrant based on probable cause, to provide a right of action for violations of Fourth Amendment rights, and for other purposes. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 23, 2026 Mr. Massie (for himself and Ms. Boebert) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To amend title 18, United States Code, to ensure that all searches that significantly impinge on the privacy or security of a person require a warrant based on probable cause, to provide a right of action for violations of Fourth Amendment rights, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Surveillance Accountability Act''. SEC. 2. WARRANT REQUIREMENT FOR SEARCHES. (a) In General.--Chapter 205 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section: ``Sec. 3119. Searches to accord with the Fourth Amendment ``(a) Warrant Requirement.-- ``(1) In general.--Except as provided in subsection (b), no search may be conducted without a warrant issued by a neutral and detached magistrate upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized. ``(2) Third-party data.-- ``(A) Presumption of privacy.--The government shall not access any data, metadata, or personal information held by a third party, including financial services providers, telecommunication service providers, internet service providers, cloud storage companies, or data brokers, without a valid warrant, regardless of whether the third party consents or cooperates. ``(B) Exception invalidated.--No contractual agreement between a user and a third party may be interpreted as waiving the government's warrant requirement for access to the data of that user, unless such waiver is knowing, voluntary, and explicit. ``(b) Exceptions.--The following may be conducted without a warrant: ``(1) Plain-view searches. ``(2) The verification of government-issued primary photo identification documents during a stop of a motor vehicle, travel, or other interactions with law enforcement, including the verification of-- ``(A) a State identification card; ``(B) a driver's license; ``(C) a passport; ``(D) a passport card; ``(E) a military identification; or ``(F) a permanent resident card. ``(3) The collection or analysis of information that is lawfully published or voluntarily made available by a person or entity to a public audience, and which requires no circumvention of privacy settings, encryption, or other access controls. ``(4) The use of lawful investigative techniques to collect data from publicly available sources such as new outlets, official government publications, public records, or user- posted content that is clearly accessible to the general public without special access or tools. ``(5) Searches conducted with consent. ``(6) Searched conducted under exigent circumstances. ``(c) Limitations.--The exceptions described in subsection (b) shall not be construed to permit the warrantless collection, retention, querying, or analysis of data exposed to public view or accessible to a third party if the person associated with the collected identifiers did not express informed and voluntary consent to such collection with respect to data gathered by entering a public place, operating a motor vehicle on a public roadway, or patronizing a private establishment open to the public, including-- ``(1) biometric data, including facial images, faceprints, gait, voice recognition, or other unique physical identifiers, obtained through facial recognition systems or comparable surveillance technologies; or ``(2) license plate images, vehicle metadata, or vehicle movement patterns obtained through automated license plate readers or similar systems. ``(d) Definitons.--In this section: ``(1) Search.--The term `search' means any government- initiated act that intrudes upon an individual's reasonable expectation of privacy, including the following: ``(A) Investigatory acts.--Any investigatory act purposefully directed at a specific person or entity, or the property of a specific person or entity, with the intent of obtaining information not otherwise available to the public. ``(B) Government surveillance and monitoring.--Any non-consensual surveillance, monitoring, or inquiry conducted by a government entity or its agents, whether through human, digital, or automated means, that collects information on a specific individual or entity, including information on that individual or entity's-- ``(i) communications; ``(ii) associations; ``(iii) employment; ``(iv) social media usage; ``(v) internet usage; ``(vi) financial transactions; or ``(vii) travel. ``(C) Collection of personal data.--The acquisition and analysis of any data, metadata, or information pertaining to a person's digital or physical life, including-- ``(i) geolocation; ``(ii) communication records; ``(iii) personal device activity; ``(iv) assets; ``(v) liabilities; ``(vi) biometric identifiers; ``(vii) behavioral signals data; or ``(viii) financial transactions. ``(2) Plain-view searches defined.--In this section, the term `plain-view searches' means the observation or seizure of evidence by a law enforcement officer who is lawfully present at a location, where the incriminating nature of the evidence is immediately apparent, and where such observation is incidental to the officer's lawful presence and does not involve the use of enhanced surveillance technology or systematic monitoring. ``(e) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section shall be construed to-- ``(1) modify, supersede, or limit any existing constitutional protection, or to authorize surveillance that would otherwise be unlawful; ``(2) eliminate or restrict constitutionally recognized exceptions permitting brief investigatory detentions or protective frisks based on reasonable suspicion; or ``(3) eliminate or restrict the authority of law enforcement officers to conduct brief investigatory detentions, protective frisks, arrests, or searches incident to ordinary criminal law enforcement encounters.''. (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for chapter 205 of title 18, United States Code, amended by adding at the end the following: ``3119. Searches to accord with the Fourth Amendment.''. SEC. 3. RIGHT OF ACTION FOR VIOLATIONS OF FOURTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS. (a) In General.--The Revised Statutes are amended by inserting after section 1979 the following: ``SEC. 1979A. DEPRIVATION OF FOURTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS. ``(a) In General.--Every person, including a Federal employee, who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of the United States, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or any person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Fourth Amendment, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress. ``(b) Attorney's Fees.--In any action, suit, or proceeding to enforce this Act, the court, in its discretion, may allow the prevailing party, other than the United States, a reasonable attorney's fee as part of the costs. ``(c) Federal Employee Defined.--In this section, the term `Federal employee' means an individual other than the President or the Vice President, who occupies a position in any agency or instrumentality of the executive branch (including any independent agency). ``(d) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section shall be construed to authorize a Federal employee to bring a suit against their Federal employer or the Federal Government for conduct that is within the scope of the employment relationship.''. (b) Severability.--If any provision of this Act or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of this Act, and the application of this Act, to any other person or circumstance, shall not be affected thereby. <all>\n--- KONIEC DOKUMENTU ---\n\nPAMIĘTAJ: Twoja odpowiedź MUSI być wyłącznie poprawnym obiektem JSON. Nie dodawaj żadnych dodatkowych znaków, komentarzy ani tekstu przed znacznikiem '{' ani po znaczniku '}'. Cała odpowiedź musi być parsowalna jako JSON.\nNa podstawie POWYŻSZEGO dokumentu, wypełnij poniższą strukturę JSON:\nOto struktura JSON, której oczekuję (wypełnij ją treścią):\n{\n  \"pl_ai_title\": \"Nowy, krótki tytuł dla aktu prawnego po polsku, oddający sedno wprowadzanych zmian (np. maksymalnie 10-12 słów).\",\n  \"pl_summary\": \"2-3 zdania zwięzłego podsumowania treści aktu prawnego po polsku, napisane z perspektywy wpływu na życie codzienne obywateli.\",\n  \"pl_key_points\": [\n    \"Pierwszy krótki punkt po polsku dotyczący najważniejszych wprowadzanych rozwiązań lub zmian.\",\n    \"Drugi krótki punkt po polsku...\"\n  ],\n  \"eng_ai_title\": \"A new, short title for the legal act in English, capturing the essence of the changes (e.g., max 10-12 words).\",\n  \"eng_summary\": \"2-3 sentences summarizing the legal act in English, from the perspective of its impact on citizens' daily lives.\",\n  \"eng_key_points\": [\n    \"First short bullet point in English regarding the most important solutions or changes being introduced.\",\n    \"Second short bullet point in English...\"\n  ],\n  \"de_ai_title\": \"Ein neuer, kurzer Titel für das Rechtsdokument auf Deutsch, der den Kern der Änderungen erfasst (z.B. max. 10-12 Wörter).\",\n  \"de_summary\": \"2-3 Sätze Zusammenfassung des Rechtsdokuments auf Deutsch, aus der Perspektive seiner Auswirkungen auf das tägliche Leben der Bürger.\",\n  \"de_key_points\": [\n    \"Erster kurzer Stichpunkt auf Deutsch zu den wichtigsten eingeführten Lösungen oder Änderungen.\",\n    \"Zweiter kurzer Stichpunkt auf Deutsch...\"\n  ],\n  \"fr_ai_title\": \"Un nouveau titre court pour l'acte juridique en français, saisissant l'essence des changements (par exemple, 10-12 mots maximum).\",\n  \"fr_summary\": \"Résumé de 2-3 phrases de l'acte juridique en français, du point de vue de son impact sur la vie quotidienne des citoyens.\",\n  \"fr_key_points\": [\n    \"Premier court point en français concernant les solutions ou changements les plus importants introduits.\",\n    \"Deuxième court point en français...\"\n  ],\n  \"es_ai_title\": \"Un nuevo título breve para el acto jurídico en español, que recoja la esencia de los cambios (por ejemplo, máximo 10-12 palabras).\",\n  \"es_summary\": \"Resumen de 2-3 frases del acto jurídico en español, desde la perspectiva de su impacto en la vida cotidiana de los ciudadanos.\",\n  \"es_key_points\": [\n    \"Primer punto breve en español sobre las soluciones o cambios más importantes que se introducen.\",\n    \"Segundo punto breve en español...\"\n  ],\n  \"it_ai_title\": \"Un nuovo titolo breve per l'atto giuridico in italiano, che colga l'essenza delle modifiche (ad es. massimo 10-12 parole).\",\n  \"it_summary\": \"Riepilogo di 2-3 frasi dell'atto giuridico in italiano, dal punto di vista del suo impatto sulla vita quotidiana dei cittadini.\",\n  \"it_key_points\": [\n    \"Primo breve punto in italiano riguardante le soluzioni o le modifiche più importanti introdotte.\",\n    \"Secondo breve punto in italiano...\"\n  ],\n  \"nl_ai_title\": \"Een nieuwe, korte titel voor de rechtshandeling in het Nederlands, die de essentie van de wijzigingen weergeeft (bijv. max. 10-12 woorden).\",\n  \"nl_summary\": \"Samenvatting van 2-3 zinnen van de rechtshandeling in het Nederlands, vanuit het perspectief van de impact op het dagelijks leven van burgers.\",\n  \"nl_key_points\": [\n    \"Eerste korte punt in het Nederlands betreffende de belangrijkste geïntroduceerde oplossingen of wijzigingen.\",\n    \"Tweede korte punt in het Nederlands...\"\n  ],\n  \"pt_ai_title\": \"Um novo título curto para o ato jurídico em português, capturando a essência das mudanças (por exemplo, máx. 10-12 palavras).\",\n  \"pt_summary\": \"Resumo de 2-3 frases do ato jurídico em português, na perspetiva do seu impacto na vida quotidiana dos cidadãos.\",\n  \"pt_key_points\": [\n    \"Primeiro ponto curto em português sobre as soluções ou alterações mais importantes introduzidas.\",\n    \"Segundo ponto curto em português...\"\n  ],\n  \"category\": [\"Categorize the document into one category by default, based on the field it primarily concerns. Choose up to 3 if the document also touches upon SIGNIFICANT issues from other categories. You MUST select categories ONLY from the following list: Health, Education, Family, Taxes, Labor, Security, Environment, Courts and Law, Transport, Benefits, Real Estate, Media and Culture, Local Government, Migration, Agriculture, Public Investments, Informatization, Economy. If the document does not definitively fit any of these, you MUST use \"Other\". If you use \"Other\", it should be the ONLY category selected. Do NOT invent new categories. The response must be an array of strings, e.g., [\"Taxes\", \"Family\"].\"]\n}\n\n",
      "ai_response_raw": "{\n  \"pl_ai_title\": \"Ustawa o Odpowiedzialności za Inwigilację: Większa ochrona prywatności i danych obywateli\",\n  \"pl_summary\": \"Ustawa nakłada na rząd obowiązek uzyskania nakazu sądowego przed dostępem do danych obywateli przechowywanych przez firmy trzecie, takie jak banki czy dostawcy internetu. Wprowadza również możliwość pozwania urzędników federalnych za naruszenie konstytucyjnego prawa do prywatności.\",\n  \"pl_key_points\": [\n    \"Wymagany nakaz sądowy na dostęp do danych u dostawców internetu, w chmurach i bankach.\",\n    \"Zakaz bezprawnego śledzenia biometrycznego (np. rozpoznawania twarzy) w miejscach publicznych.\",\n    \"Obywatele zyskują prawo do pozwania urzędników federalnych za naruszenie ich praw czwartej poprawki.\",\n    \"Umowy z firmami nie mogą być automatycznie traktowane jako zgoda na udostępnienie danych rządowi.\",\n    \"Wyjątki obejmują m.in. sytuacje nagłe, dobrowolną zgodę oraz rutynową kontrolę dokumentów tożsamości.\"\n  ],\n  \"eng_ai_title\": \"Surveillance Accountability Act: Strengthening Privacy and Warrant Requirements\",\n  \"eng_summary\": \"This Act requires the government to obtain a warrant before accessing citizen data held by third parties like banks or internet providers. It also allows individuals to sue federal employees for violating their constitutional privacy rights.\",\n  \"eng_key_points\": [\n    \"A warrant is required to access data held by ISPs, cloud storage, banks, and data brokers.\",\n    \"Prohibits warrantless biometric surveillance and license plate tracking in public spaces.\",\n    \"Creates a legal right for citizens to sue federal employees for Fourth Amendment violations.\",\n    \"User agreements with third parties cannot be used as a blanket waiver of warrant requirements.\",\n    \"Exceptions include emergency situations, explicit consent, and routine ID verification during stops.\"\n  ],\n  \"de_ai_title\": \"Überwachungs-Rechenschaftsgesetz: Stärkung des Datenschutzes und der Durchsuchungsbefehle\",\n  \"de_summary\": \"Dieses Gesetz verpflichtet die Regierung, einen richterlichen Durchsuchungsbefehl einzuholen, bevor sie auf Daten von Bürgern zugreift, die bei Dritten wie Banken oder Internetanbietern gespeichert sind. Es ermöglicht zudem Klagen gegen Bundesbedienstete bei Verletzungen der verfassungsmäßigen Privatsphäre.\",\n  \"de_key_points\": [\n    \"Durchsuchungsbefehl für Daten bei Internetanbietern, Cloud-Diensten und Banken zwingend erforderlich.\",\n    \"Verbot der grundlosen biometrischen Überwachung (z. B. Gesichtserkennung) im öffentlichen Raum.\",\n    \"Bürger erhalten das Recht, Bundesbeamte wegen Verletzung ihrer Grundrechte zu verklagen.\",\n    \"Nutzungsbedingungen von Drittanbietern gelten nicht als automatischer Verzicht auf den Schutz der Privatsphäre.\",\n    \"Ausnahmen gelten für Notfälle, ausdrückliche Zustimmung und routinemäßige Identitätsprüfungen.\"\n  ],\n  \"fr_ai_title\": \"Loi sur la responsabilité en matière de surveillance : Renforcement de la vie privée\",\n  \"fr_summary\": \"Cette loi oblige le gouvernement à obtenir un mandat avant d'accéder aux données des citoyens détenues par des tiers comme les banques ou les fournisseurs d'accès internet. Elle permet également de poursuivre les employés fédéraux pour violation des droits constitutionnels à la vie privée.\",\n  \"fr_key_points\": [\n    \"Mandat requis pour accéder aux données chez les fournisseurs internet, le stockage cloud et les banques.\",\n    \"Interdiction de la surveillance biométrique sans mandat (ex: reconnaissance faciale) dans les lieux publics.\",\n    \"Droit pour les citoyens de poursuivre les agents fédéraux pour violation du quatrième amendement.\",\n    \"Les contrats d'utilisation ne peuvent être interprétés comme une renonciation automatique au mandat.\",\n    \"Les exceptions incluent les urgences, le consentement explicite et la vérification d'identité de routine.\"\n  ],\n  \"es_ai_title\": \"Ley de Responsabilidad de Vigilancia: Mayor protección de la privacidad y los datos\",\n  \"es_summary\": \"Esta ley exige que el gobierno obtenga una orden judicial antes de acceder a los datos de los ciudadanos en manos de terceros, como bancos o proveedores de internet. También permite demandar a empleados federales por violar los derechos constitucionales de privacidad.\",\n  \"es_key_points\": [\n    \"Se requiere orden judicial para acceder a datos en proveedores de internet, nubes y bancos.\",\n    \"Prohibición de vigilancia biométrica (como reconocimiento facial) sin orden en espacios públicos.\",\n    \"Derecho de los ciudadanos a demandar a funcionarios federales por violaciones de la Cuarta Enmienda.\",\n    \"Los acuerdos con terceros no se consideran una renuncia automática al requisito de orden judicial.\",\n    \"Las excepciones incluyen emergencias, consentimiento explícito y verificación rutinaria de identidad.\"\n  ],\n  \"it_ai_title\": \"Legge sulla responsabilità della sorveglianza: Rafforzamento della privacy e dei mandati\",\n  \"it_summary\": \"Questa legge impone al governo di ottenere un mandato prima di accedere ai dati dei cittadini detenuti da terzi, come banche o fornitori di servizi internet. Consente inoltre di citare in giudizio i dipendenti federali per violazione dei diritti costituzionali alla privacy.\",\n  \"it_key_points\": [\n    \"Mandato obbligatorio per accedere ai dati presso ISP, servizi cloud e istituti finanziari.\",\n    \"Divieto di sorveglianza biometrica senza mandato (es. riconoscimento facciale) in luoghi pubblici.\",\n    \"Diritto per i cittadini di citare in giudizio i dipendenti federali per violazioni del Quarto Emendamento.\",\n    \"I contratti con terze parti non possono annullare l'obbligo di mandato per l'accesso ai dati.\",\n    \"Le eccezioni riguardano emergenze, consenso esplicito e controlli di identità ordinari.\"\n  ],\n  \"nl_ai_title\": \"Wet op Toezichtverantwoording: Versterking van Privacy en Opsporingsbevelen\",\n  \"nl_summary\": \"Deze wet verplicht de overheid om een bevel te verkrijgen voordat zij toegang krijgt tot gegevens van burgers die worden beheerd door derden, zoals banken of internetproviders. Het stelt burgers ook in staat om federale werknemers aan te klagen wegens schending van hun constitutionele privacyrechten.\",\n  \"nl_key_points\": [\n    \"Opsporingsbevel vereist voor toegang tot gegevens bij internetproviders, clouddiensten en banken.\",\n    \"Verbod op biometrische surveillance zonder bevel (zoals gezichtsherkenning) in de openbare ruimte.\",\n    \"Burgers krijgen het recht om federale ambtenaren aan te klagen voor schendingen van het Vierde Amendement.\",\n    \"Gebruikersovereenkomsten gelden niet als automatische afstand van het recht op een opsporingsbevel.\",\n    \"Uitzonderingen zijn onder meer noodsituaties, uitdrukkelijke toestemming en routinecontroles van ID-bewijzen.\"\n  ],\n  \"pt_ai_title\": \"Lei de Responsabilidade de Vigilância: Reforço da Privacidade e dos Mandatos\",\n  \"pt_summary\": \"Esta lei exige que o governo obtenha um mandado antes de aceder a dados de cidadãos detidos por terceiros, como bancos ou fornecedores de internet. Também permite processar funcionários federais por violação dos direitos constitucionais de privacidade.\",\n  \"pt_key_points\": [\n    \"Mandato obrigatório para aceder a dados em ISPs, armazenamento na nuvem e bancos.\",\n    \"Proibição de vigilância biométrica sem mandado (ex: reconhecimento facial) em espaços públicos.\",\n    \"Direito dos cidadãos de processar funcionários federais por violações da Quarta Emenda.\",\n    \"Acordos com terceiros não podem ser usados para contornar a exigência de mandado judicial.\",\n    \"As exceções incluem emergências, consentimento explícito e verificação de identidade de rotina.\"\n  ],\n  \"category\": [\n    \"Courts and Law\",\n    \"Security\",\n    \"Informatization\"\n  ]\n}"
    }
  ]
}