{
  "legislationId": "119_SRES_672",
  "lastUpdate": "2026-04-18T11:26:36.329Z",
  "history": [
    {
      "timestamp": "2026-04-18T11:26:36.329Z",
      "source_url": "https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/sres672/BILLS-119sres672is.htm",
      "model": "gemini-flash-lite-latest",
      "prompt_sent": "\nROLE: Fact Checker.\nZADANIE: Porównaj SOURCE (oryginał) i SUMMARY (streszczenie przygotowane przez inne AI).\n\nTwoim celem jest wykrycie \"ZMYŚLONYCH KONKRETÓW\" (Fabricated Entities) w SUMMARY.\n\nSOURCE:\n[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [S. Res. 672 Introduced in Senate (IS)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session S. RES. 672 Expressing the sense of Congress that the United States should prioritize bilateral security partnerships over multilateral security partnerships and institutions. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES April 15 (legislative day, April 14), 2026 Mr. Lee submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations _______________________________________________________________________ RESOLUTION Expressing the sense of Congress that the United States should prioritize bilateral security partnerships over multilateral security partnerships and institutions. Whereas alliances have historically allowed states to combine their capabilities to combat shared security challenges and promote shared values and interests; Whereas, in the era of great powers and regional hegemony that followed World War II, alliances have operated with small and medium states standing behind great powers; Whereas the United States is the most free and powerful state in world history; Whereas the United States has a duty to secure the blessings of liberty and provide for the common defense of the homeland; Whereas the United States historically contributes almost one third of the total funds of the United Nations budget, yet has the same voting power and influence as all other member states in the United Nations; Whereas the United States historically spends more than twice as much money on defense as all the other member states of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization combined; Whereas the United States historically contributed almost one quarter of the total funds of the World Health Organization budget when the United States was a member of the World Health Organization; Whereas the United States has contributed significantly to other multilateral institutions and multilateral security agreements at the expense of United States taxpayers and has failed to deliver returns on investment to Americans; Whereas the significant financial and security contributions the United States has provided to multilateral institutions has not served United States interests of securing the blessings of liberty or providing for the common defense of the homeland; Whereas bilateral agreements deliver stronger outcomes for the United States and put the United States in a more favorable position to advance its interests; Whereas bilateral negotiations give the United States more leverage, and diplomacy is tailored to the culture, needs, and capabilities of each partner country; Whereas bilateral agreements are often stronger, easier to secure, and can be amended more feasibly as the security environment and the interests of the United States change; Whereas the United States is not coerced to relinquish its interests at the expense of the interests of other great powers and adversaries which are hostile towards the United States; Whereas many multilateral agreements and institutions have outlived their original objectives and do not accurately represent the shared interests of the member states; Whereas the United Nations is fraught with ideologies that do not align with the United States, including Marxism, antisemitism, climate alarmism, and other extremist ideologies that contradict the values of liberty and prosperity represented by the United States; Whereas many of the countries that perpetrate gross violations of human rights against women, children, and minorities are active and influential members in the very United Nations bodies tasked with human rights protections; Whereas the World Health Organization proved to be a puppet of the Chinese Communist Party, an adversary of the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic, and failed to make meaningful reforms following the pandemic; Whereas the United Nations repeatedly protects the interests of adversaries of the United States by excluding Taiwan from participating in the United Nations system and elevating false Chinese data over other countries' data through the World Health Organization; Whereas the objectives of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization outlined in the North Atlantic Treaty, done at Washington on April 4, 1949, were reached upon the dissolution of the Soviet Union, and several member states within the North Atlantic Treaty Organization no longer share values and interests with the United States; Whereas the members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization have failed to assist the United States during its time of crisis facing the Iranian regime, which repeatedly threatened the interests of all North Atlantic Treaty states with terrorist proxies; and Whereas the interests and priorities of the United States are best served by bilateral security agreements with its partners and allies and not by multilateral security agreements or institutions: Now, therefore, be it Resolved, That the Senate-- (1) expresses that the United States must use its power, influence, and resources to encourage small and medium states to choose the United States as its great power partner and ally of choice; (2) recognizes that the United States should prioritize bilateral security agreements over multilateral security agreements and institutions; and (3) determines that the United States should withdraw support for multilateral security agreements or institutions that undermine United States interests. <all>\n\nSUMMARY TO EVALUATE:\nTitle: Prioritizing bilateral security deals over international organizations and multilateral institutions\nSummary: This resolution suggests that the U.S. should focus on one-on-one security agreements with other countries rather than relying on large international groups. The goal is to ensure taxpayer money is used more effectively to protect American interests and values.\nKey Points: Focus on direct partnerships with individual countries instead of large international organizations like the UN or NATO., Potential withdrawal of funding and support for international groups that do not align with U.S. goals., Aim to gain more leverage and flexibility in negotiations by dealing with countries one-on-one., Critique of current spending levels in multilateral groups where the U.S. pays more but has limited influence.\n\nZASADY OCENY:\n1. Sprawdź wszystkie LICZBY, DATY i KWOTY w SUMMARY. Jeśli którejś brakuje w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n2. Sprawdź wszystkie NAZWISKA, ORGANIZACJE i MIEJSCA w SUMMARY. Jeśli którejś brakuje w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n3. Sprawdź wszystkie konkretne DZIAŁANIA PRAWNE . Jeśli tego mechanizmu nie ma w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n\nWAŻNE: Abstrakcyjne pojęcia (np. \"transparentność\", \"zaufanie\") są dozwolone jako wnioski.\n\nOUTPUT (JSON):\n{\n  \"is_valid\": true/false,\n  \"issue\": \"fabricated_entity\" / \"contradiction\" / \"none\"\n}\n\nWYMAGANIA FORMATOWANIA:\n1. Odpowiedz WYŁĄCZNIE surowym obiektem JSON.\n2. NIE używaj bloków kodu Markdown.\n3. NIE dodawaj żadnych wstępów ani wyjaśnień przed ani po JSONie.\n4. JSON musi być poprawny i gotowy do parsowania.\n\n",
      "ai_response_raw": "{\n  \"is_valid\": true,\n  \"issue\": \"none\"\n}"
    },
    {
      "timestamp": "2026-04-18T11:18:08.021Z",
      "source_url": "https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/sres672/BILLS-119sres672is.htm",
      "model": "gemini-flash-latest",
      "prompt_sent": "\nJesteś ekspertem od prawa Stanów Zjednoczonych, który ma za zadanie analizować dokumenty ustaw, uchwał oraz innych dokumentów legislacyjnych, a następnie przygotowywać z nich informacje w przystępny sposób dla obywateli. Twoim celem jest przedstawienie informacji tak, aby obywatele mogli sami ocenić wpływ legislacji na ich życie, nawet bez posiadania specjalistycznej wiedzy legislacyjnej. Skup się na faktach i obiektywnych skutkach wprowadzanych zmian, unikając wartościowania i osobistych opinii. Wszelki żargon prawny jest zabroniony. Prezentuj informacje w jasny, zwięzły i angażujący sposób, tak aby były zrozumiałe dla osoby bez wykształcenia prawniczego. Unikaj długich, złożonych zdań. Zamiast pisać \"projekt ma na celu nowelizację kodeksu podatkowego...\", napisz \"Zmiany w podatkach: nowe ulgi i obowiązki dla...\". Kontynuuj swoją pracę, dopóki nie rozwiążesz swojego zadania. Jeśli nie masz pewności co do generowanej treści, przeanalizuj dokument ponownie – nie zgaduj. Rozplanuj dobrze swoje zadanie przed przystąpieniem do niego. W podsumowaniu i kluczowych punktach, jeśli to możliwe i uzasadnione, podkreśl, jakie konkretne korzyści lub skutki (pozytywne lub negatywne) wprowadza ustawa dla życia codziennego obywateli, ich praw i obowiązków, finansów osobistych, bezpieczeństwa i innych ważnych kwestii (np. kategorycznych zakazów i nakazów czy najważniejszych konkretnych alokacji finansowych i terytorialnych).\n\nTwoja odpowiedź MUSI być w formacie JSON - i zawierać następujące klucze.\nZanim zwrócisz odpowiedź, dokładnie zweryfikuj, czy cała struktura JSON jest w 100% poprawna, włącznie ze wszystkimi przecinkami, nawiasami klamrowymi, kwadratowymi oraz cudzysłowami. Błędny JSON jest nieakceptowalny i uniemożliwi przetworzenie Twojej pracy.\n\nPrzeanalizuj dokładnie poniższy tekst dokumentu prawnego. To jest treść, na podstawie której masz wygenerować podsumowanie i kluczowe punkty:\n--- POCZĄTEK DOKUMENTU ---\n[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [S. Res. 672 Introduced in Senate (IS)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session S. RES. 672 Expressing the sense of Congress that the United States should prioritize bilateral security partnerships over multilateral security partnerships and institutions. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES April 15 (legislative day, April 14), 2026 Mr. Lee submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations _______________________________________________________________________ RESOLUTION Expressing the sense of Congress that the United States should prioritize bilateral security partnerships over multilateral security partnerships and institutions. Whereas alliances have historically allowed states to combine their capabilities to combat shared security challenges and promote shared values and interests; Whereas, in the era of great powers and regional hegemony that followed World War II, alliances have operated with small and medium states standing behind great powers; Whereas the United States is the most free and powerful state in world history; Whereas the United States has a duty to secure the blessings of liberty and provide for the common defense of the homeland; Whereas the United States historically contributes almost one third of the total funds of the United Nations budget, yet has the same voting power and influence as all other member states in the United Nations; Whereas the United States historically spends more than twice as much money on defense as all the other member states of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization combined; Whereas the United States historically contributed almost one quarter of the total funds of the World Health Organization budget when the United States was a member of the World Health Organization; Whereas the United States has contributed significantly to other multilateral institutions and multilateral security agreements at the expense of United States taxpayers and has failed to deliver returns on investment to Americans; Whereas the significant financial and security contributions the United States has provided to multilateral institutions has not served United States interests of securing the blessings of liberty or providing for the common defense of the homeland; Whereas bilateral agreements deliver stronger outcomes for the United States and put the United States in a more favorable position to advance its interests; Whereas bilateral negotiations give the United States more leverage, and diplomacy is tailored to the culture, needs, and capabilities of each partner country; Whereas bilateral agreements are often stronger, easier to secure, and can be amended more feasibly as the security environment and the interests of the United States change; Whereas the United States is not coerced to relinquish its interests at the expense of the interests of other great powers and adversaries which are hostile towards the United States; Whereas many multilateral agreements and institutions have outlived their original objectives and do not accurately represent the shared interests of the member states; Whereas the United Nations is fraught with ideologies that do not align with the United States, including Marxism, antisemitism, climate alarmism, and other extremist ideologies that contradict the values of liberty and prosperity represented by the United States; Whereas many of the countries that perpetrate gross violations of human rights against women, children, and minorities are active and influential members in the very United Nations bodies tasked with human rights protections; Whereas the World Health Organization proved to be a puppet of the Chinese Communist Party, an adversary of the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic, and failed to make meaningful reforms following the pandemic; Whereas the United Nations repeatedly protects the interests of adversaries of the United States by excluding Taiwan from participating in the United Nations system and elevating false Chinese data over other countries' data through the World Health Organization; Whereas the objectives of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization outlined in the North Atlantic Treaty, done at Washington on April 4, 1949, were reached upon the dissolution of the Soviet Union, and several member states within the North Atlantic Treaty Organization no longer share values and interests with the United States; Whereas the members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization have failed to assist the United States during its time of crisis facing the Iranian regime, which repeatedly threatened the interests of all North Atlantic Treaty states with terrorist proxies; and Whereas the interests and priorities of the United States are best served by bilateral security agreements with its partners and allies and not by multilateral security agreements or institutions: Now, therefore, be it Resolved, That the Senate-- (1) expresses that the United States must use its power, influence, and resources to encourage small and medium states to choose the United States as its great power partner and ally of choice; (2) recognizes that the United States should prioritize bilateral security agreements over multilateral security agreements and institutions; and (3) determines that the United States should withdraw support for multilateral security agreements or institutions that undermine United States interests. <all>\n--- KONIEC DOKUMENTU ---\n\nPAMIĘTAJ: Twoja odpowiedź MUSI być wyłącznie poprawnym obiektem JSON. Nie dodawaj żadnych dodatkowych znaków, komentarzy ani tekstu przed znacznikiem '{' ani po znaczniku '}'. Cała odpowiedź musi być parsowalna jako JSON.\nNa podstawie POWYŻSZEGO dokumentu, wypełnij poniższą strukturę JSON:\nOto struktura JSON, której oczekuję (wypełnij ją treścią):\n{\n  \"pl_ai_title\": \"Nowy, krótki tytuł dla aktu prawnego po polsku, oddający sedno wprowadzanych zmian (np. maksymalnie 10-12 słów).\",\n  \"pl_summary\": \"2-3 zdania zwięzłego podsumowania treści aktu prawnego po polsku, napisane z perspektywy wpływu na życie codzienne obywateli.\",\n  \"pl_key_points\": [\n    \"Pierwszy krótki punkt po polsku dotyczący najważniejszych wprowadzanych rozwiązań lub zmian.\",\n    \"Drugi krótki punkt po polsku...\"\n  ],\n  \"eng_ai_title\": \"A new, short title for the legal act in English, capturing the essence of the changes (e.g., max 10-12 words).\",\n  \"eng_summary\": \"2-3 sentences summarizing the legal act in English, from the perspective of its impact on citizens' daily lives.\",\n  \"eng_key_points\": [\n    \"First short bullet point in English regarding the most important solutions or changes being introduced.\",\n    \"Second short bullet point in English...\"\n  ],\n  \"de_ai_title\": \"Ein neuer, kurzer Titel für das Rechtsdokument auf Deutsch, der den Kern der Änderungen erfasst (z.B. max. 10-12 Wörter).\",\n  \"de_summary\": \"2-3 Sätze Zusammenfassung des Rechtsdokuments auf Deutsch, aus der Perspektive seiner Auswirkungen auf das tägliche Leben der Bürger.\",\n  \"de_key_points\": [\n    \"Erster kurzer Stichpunkt auf Deutsch zu den wichtigsten eingeführten Lösungen oder Änderungen.\",\n    \"Zweiter kurzer Stichpunkt auf Deutsch...\"\n  ],\n  \"fr_ai_title\": \"Un nouveau titre court pour l'acte juridique en français, saisissant l'essence des changements (par exemple, 10-12 mots maximum).\",\n  \"fr_summary\": \"Résumé de 2-3 phrases de l'acte juridique en français, du point de vue de son impact sur la vie quotidienne des citoyens.\",\n  \"fr_key_points\": [\n    \"Premier court point en français concernant les solutions ou changements les plus importants introduits.\",\n    \"Deuxième court point en français...\"\n  ],\n  \"es_ai_title\": \"Un nuevo título breve para el acto jurídico en español, que recoja la esencia de los cambios (por ejemplo, máximo 10-12 palabras).\",\n  \"es_summary\": \"Resumen de 2-3 frases del acto jurídico en español, desde la perspectiva de su impacto en la vida cotidiana de los ciudadanos.\",\n  \"es_key_points\": [\n    \"Primer punto breve en español sobre las soluciones o cambios más importantes que se introducen.\",\n    \"Segundo punto breve en español...\"\n  ],\n  \"it_ai_title\": \"Un nuovo titolo breve per l'atto giuridico in italiano, che colga l'essenza delle modifiche (ad es. massimo 10-12 parole).\",\n  \"it_summary\": \"Riepilogo di 2-3 frasi dell'atto giuridico in italiano, dal punto di vista del suo impatto sulla vita quotidiana dei cittadini.\",\n  \"it_key_points\": [\n    \"Primo breve punto in italiano riguardante le soluzioni o le modifiche più importanti introdotte.\",\n    \"Secondo breve punto in italiano...\"\n  ],\n  \"nl_ai_title\": \"Een nieuwe, korte titel voor de rechtshandeling in het Nederlands, die de essentie van de wijzigingen weergeeft (bijv. max. 10-12 woorden).\",\n  \"nl_summary\": \"Samenvatting van 2-3 zinnen van de rechtshandeling in het Nederlands, vanuit het perspectief van de impact op het dagelijks leven van burgers.\",\n  \"nl_key_points\": [\n    \"Eerste korte punt in het Nederlands betreffende de belangrijkste geïntroduceerde oplossingen of wijzigingen.\",\n    \"Tweede korte punt in het Nederlands...\"\n  ],\n  \"pt_ai_title\": \"Um novo título curto para o ato jurídico em português, capturando a essência das mudanças (por exemplo, máx. 10-12 palavras).\",\n  \"pt_summary\": \"Resumo de 2-3 frases do ato jurídico em português, na perspetiva do seu impacto na vida quotidiana dos cidadãos.\",\n  \"pt_key_points\": [\n    \"Primeiro ponto curto em português sobre as soluções ou alterações mais importantes introduzidas.\",\n    \"Segundo ponto curto em português...\"\n  ],\n  \"category\": [\"Categorize the document into one category by default, based on the field it primarily concerns. Choose up to 3 if the document also touches upon SIGNIFICANT issues from other categories. You MUST select categories ONLY from the following list: Health, Education, Family, Taxes, Labor, Security, Environment, Courts and Law, Transport, Benefits, Real Estate, Media and Culture, Local Government, Migration, Agriculture, Public Investments, Informatization, Economy. If the document does not definitively fit any of these, you MUST use \"Other\". If you use \"Other\", it should be the ONLY category selected. Do NOT invent new categories. The response must be an array of strings, e.g., [\"Taxes\", \"Family\"].\"]\n}\n\n",
      "ai_response_raw": "{\n  \"pl_ai_title\": \"Priorytet dla umów dwustronnych zamiast organizacji międzynarodowych w polityce bezpieczeństwa USA\",\n  \"pl_summary\": \"Rezolucja zakłada zmianę podejścia USA do bezpieczeństwa, stawiając na bezpośrednie umowy z poszczególnymi krajami zamiast dużych organizacji jak ONZ czy NATO. Ma to na celu lepszą ochronę pieniędzy podatników i skuteczniejszą realizację interesów narodowych.\",\n  \"pl_key_points\": [\n    \"Przesunięcie środków i uwagi z organizacji wielostronnych (np. ONZ, WHO) na bezpośrednie sojusze z wybranymi państwami.\",\n    \"Możliwe wycofanie wsparcia dla instytucji międzynarodowych, które działają wbrew interesom Stanów Zjednoczonych.\",\n    \"Dążenie do większej kontroli nad tym, jak wydawane są pieniądze amerykańskich podatników na obronność i pomoc zagraniczną.\",\n    \"Krytyka obecnego funkcjonowania NATO i WHO jako organizacji nieefektywnych lub sprzecznych z wartościami USA.\"\n  ],\n  \"eng_ai_title\": \"Prioritizing bilateral security deals over international organizations and multilateral institutions\",\n  \"eng_summary\": \"This resolution suggests that the U.S. should focus on one-on-one security agreements with other countries rather than relying on large international groups. The goal is to ensure taxpayer money is used more effectively to protect American interests and values.\",\n  \"eng_key_points\": [\n    \"Focus on direct partnerships with individual countries instead of large international organizations like the UN or NATO.\",\n    \"Potential withdrawal of funding and support for international groups that do not align with U.S. goals.\",\n    \"Aim to gain more leverage and flexibility in negotiations by dealing with countries one-on-one.\",\n    \"Critique of current spending levels in multilateral groups where the U.S. pays more but has limited influence.\"\n  ],\n  \"de_ai_title\": \"Vorrang für bilaterale Sicherheitsbündnisse gegenüber internationalen Organisationen und Institutionen\",\n  \"de_summary\": \"Diese Resolution schlägt vor, dass die USA direkte Sicherheitsabkommen mit einzelnen Ländern gegenüber großen internationalen Organisationen bevorzugen sollten. Ziel ist es, die Interessen der USA besser zu schützen und die Verwendung von Steuergeldern effizienter zu gestalten.\",\n  \"de_key_points\": [\n    \"Bevorzugung direkter Partnerschaften mit einzelnen Staaten statt großer Organisationen wie der UN oder NATO.\",\n    \"Möglicher Rückzug der Unterstützung für internationale Institutionen, die US-Interessen schaden.\",\n    \"Stärkere Kontrolle über Verteidigungsausgaben und eine bessere Rendite für amerikanische Steuerzahler.\"\n  ],\n  \"fr_ai_title\": \"Priorité aux partenariats de sécurité bilatéraux sur les organisations et institutions multilatérales\",\n  \"fr_summary\": \"Cette résolution propose que les États-Unis privilégient les accords de sécurité directs avec chaque pays plutôt que de passer par de grandes organisations internationales. L'objectif est de mieux protéger les intérêts américains et d'optimiser l'utilisation de l'argent des contribuables.\",\n  \"fr_key_points\": [\n    \"Privilégier les alliances directes avec des pays individuels au détriment des grands groupes comme l'ONU ou l'OTAN.\",\n    \"Retrait potentiel du soutien aux institutions internationales jugées contraires aux intérêts des États-Unis.\",\n    \"Recherche d'une plus grande influence et d'une flexibilité accrue dans les négociations diplomatiques.\"\n  ],\n  \"es_ai_title\": \"Prioridad a las alianzas de seguridad bilaterales sobre las organizaciones e instituciones multilaterales\",\n  \"es_summary\": \"Esta resolución propone que Estados Unidos priorice los acuerdos de seguridad directos con países individuales en lugar de depender de grandes organizaciones internacionales. Se busca proteger mejor los intereses nacionales y asegurar un uso más eficiente del dinero de los contribuyentes.\",\n  \"es_key_points\": [\n    \"Enfoque en asociaciones directas con países individuales en lugar de grupos como la ONU o la OTAN.\",\n    \"Posible retiro del apoyo a instituciones internacionales que actúen en contra de los intereses de EE. UU.\",\n    \"Búsqueda de mayor control sobre el gasto en defensa y mejores resultados para los ciudadanos estadounidenses.\"\n  ],\n  \"it_ai_title\": \"Priorità ai partenariati di sicurezza bilaterali rispetto alle organizzazioni e istituzioni multilaterali\",\n  \"it_summary\": \"Questa risoluzione suggerisce che gli Stati Uniti dovrebbero privilegiare accordi di sicurezza diretti con i singoli paesi rispetto alle grandi organizzazioni internazionali. L'obiettivo è tutelare meglio gli interessi americani e garantire un uso più efficace del denaro dei contribuenti.\",\n  \"it_key_points\": [\n    \"Privilegiare alleanze dirette con singoli stati invece di organizzazioni come l'ONU o la NATO.\",\n    \"Possibile ritiro del sostegno a istituzioni internazionali che danneggiano gli interessi degli Stati Uniti.\",\n    \"Maggiore flessibilità nelle trattative diplomatiche e controllo sui fondi destinati alla difesa.\"\n  ],\n  \"nl_ai_title\": \"Prioriteit voor bilaterale veiligheidspartnerschappen boven internationale organisaties en instellingen\",\n  \"nl_summary\": \"Deze resolutie stelt voor dat de VS de voorkeur geeft aan directe veiligheidsakkoorden met individuele landen boven grote internationale organisaties. Het doel is om de Amerikaanse belangen beter te beschermen en belastinggeld efficiënter te gebruiken.\",\n  \"nl_key_points\": [\n    \"Focus op directe partnerschappen met individuele landen in plaats van grote groepen zoals de VN of de NAVO.\",\n    \"Mogelijke intrekking van steun aan internationale instellingen die de belangen van de VS schaden.\",\n    \"Streven naar meer invloed en flexibiliteit in diplomatieke onderhandelingen.\"\n  ],\n  \"pt_ai_title\": \"Prioridade às parcerias de segurança bilaterais em detrimento de organizações e instituições multilaterais\",\n  \"pt_summary\": \"Esta resolução propõe que os EUA priorizem acordos de segurança diretos com países individuais em vez de depender de grandes organizações internacionais. O objetivo é proteger melhor os interesses americanos e garantir um uso mais eficiente do dinheiro dos contribuintes.\",\n  \"pt_key_points\": [\n    \"Foco em parcerias diretas com países individuais em vez de grupos como a ONU ou a OTAN.\",\n    \"Possível retirada de apoio a instituições internacionais que prejudiquem os interesses dos EUA.\",\n    \"Busca por maior influência e flexibilidade nas negociações diplomáticas e defesa.\"\n  ],\n  \"category\": [\n    \"Security\",\n    \"Economy\"\n  ]\n}"
    }
  ]
}