{
  "legislationId": "119_S_3921",
  "lastUpdate": "2026-03-13T12:30:05.506Z",
  "history": [
    {
      "timestamp": "2026-03-13T12:30:05.506Z",
      "source_url": "https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/s3921/BILLS-119s3921is.htm",
      "model": "gemini-flash-lite-latest",
      "prompt_sent": "\nROLE: Fact Checker.\nZADANIE: Porównaj SOURCE (oryginał) i SUMMARY (streszczenie przygotowane przez inne AI).\n\nTwoim celem jest wykrycie \"ZMYŚLONYCH KONKRETÓW\" (Fabricated Entities) w SUMMARY.\n\nSOURCE:\n[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [S. 3921 Introduced in Senate (IS)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session S. 3921 To establish eligibility requirements for the use of Federal funds for Special Event Assessment Rating support in sanctuary jurisdictions and to reallocate such funds to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement for immigration enforcement efforts. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES February 25, 2026 Mr. Scott of Florida introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To establish eligibility requirements for the use of Federal funds for Special Event Assessment Rating support in sanctuary jurisdictions and to reallocate such funds to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement for immigration enforcement efforts. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Sanctuary Jurisdiction Event Security Enhancement Act''. SEC. 2. FINDINGS. Congress finds the following: (1) The Special Event Assessment Rating program, which is administered by the Department of Homeland Security, assesses risks for major events to ensure public safety and national security. (2) Sanctuary jurisdictions, by limiting cooperation with Federal immigration enforcement, may hinder intelligence sharing and increase vulnerabilities at such events, including threats from illegal aliens potentially involved in terrorism or disruptions. (3) Examples of such increased vulnerabilities include more than 382 border encounters with individuals on terrorist watch lists along United States borders between fiscal years 2021 and 2024, inclusive, and historical cases of foreign-born terrorists illegally entering the United States plotting attacks against our country. (4) Conditioning SEAR support on compliance with immigration laws-- (A) promotes the general welfare of the American people; (B) is unambiguous; (C) directly relates to event security risks; (D) complies with all relevant provisions in the United States Constitution; (E) does not coerce compliance by sanctuary jurisdictions; and (F) is consistent with the holding by the United States Supreme Court in South Dakota v. Dole (483 U.S. 203 (1987)). SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS. In this Act: (1) Sanctuary jurisdiction.--The term ``sanctuary jurisdiction'' means a State or a political subdivision of a State that has in effect a statute, ordinance, policy, or practice that prohibits or restricts-- (A) sending, receiving, maintaining, or exchanging with any Federal, State, or local government entity information regarding the citizenship or immigration status (lawful or unlawful) of any individual; or (B) complying with a request lawfully made by the Department of Homeland Security under section 236 or 287 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1226 and 1357) to detain an alien. (2) SEAR support.--The term ``SEAR support'' means any Federal funds, grants, or resources provided by the Department of Homeland Security for Special Event Assessment Rating activities, including risk assessments, explosive detection teams, cyber support, or other security measures for voluntarily submitted events. SEC. 4. INELIGIBILITY OF SANCTUARY JURISDICTIONS FOR FEDERAL FUNDING FOR SEAR SUPPORT. (a) In General.--Subject to subsection (b) and notwithstanding any other provision of law, sanctuary jurisdictions are ineligible to receive Federal funds for SEAR support for events taking place in such jurisdictions, including funding from-- (1) the Department of Homeland Security's Office of Operations Coordination; or (2) related grant programs, such as the Homeland Security Grant Program. (b) Notification and Certification Requirements.--The ineligibility of a sanctuary jurisdiction to receive Federal funds described in subsection (a) shall not take effect unless-- (1) 30 days has elapsed since the sanctuary jurisdiction was notified by the Secretary of Homeland Security that it is a sanctuary jurisdiction; and (2) the sanctuary jurisdiction fails to certify to the Secretary of Homeland Security that it is in full compliance with the immigration laws (as defined in section 101(a)(17) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(17))), including section 642 of the Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (division C of Public Law 104-208; 8 U.S.C. 1373). SEC. 5. REALLOCATION. (a) In General.--An amount equal to the reduction in expenditures resulting from the ineligibility of certain sanctuary jurisdictions under section 4 shall be reallocated to Enforcement and Removal Operations of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. (b) Priority.--Of the amounts reallocated pursuant to subsection (a)-- (1) priority shall be given to immigration enforcement activities in response to public safety threats, including arrests, detentions, and deportations of convicted criminal noncitizens, gang members, and individuals on terrorist watch lists; and (2) at least 50 percent shall be expended for border- related removals and enforcement operations. SEC. 6. SEMIANNUAL REPORTS. The Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit semiannual reports to Congress detailing-- (1) the amount of funds that have been withheld pursuant to section 4; (2) the amount of funds that have been reallocated pursuant to section 5; (3) the impact such reallocations have had on enforcement outcomes, including the number of arrests, detentions, and deportations; and (4) the impact of this Act on reducing risks from illegal aliens at major events. SEC. 7. SEVERABILITY. If any provision of this Act, or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance, is held invalid, the remainder of this section, and the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances, shall not be affected. <all>\n\nSUMMARY TO EVALUATE:\nTitle: Restricting Event Security Funding for Sanctuary Jurisdictions\nSummary: This bill cuts federal security funding for major events in cities and states that do not cooperate with federal immigration authorities. These funds will be redirected to ICE for immigration enforcement, including arrests and deportations.\nKey Points: Jurisdictions labeled as 'sanctuary jurisdictions' will lose federal grants and resources for securing large-scale events., Withheld funds will be reallocated to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for enforcement and removal operations., Priority for the reallocated funds will be given to the arrest and deportation of criminal noncitizens and suspected terrorists., At least 50 percent of the redirected money must be used specifically for border-related enforcement and removals.\n\nZASADY OCENY:\n1. Sprawdź wszystkie LICZBY, DATY i KWOTY w SUMMARY. Jeśli którejś brakuje w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n2. Sprawdź wszystkie NAZWISKA, ORGANIZACJE i MIEJSCA w SUMMARY. Jeśli którejś brakuje w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n3. Sprawdź wszystkie konkretne DZIAŁANIA PRAWNE . Jeśli tego mechanizmu nie ma w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n\nWAŻNE: Abstrakcyjne pojęcia (np. \"transparentność\", \"zaufanie\") są dozwolone jako wnioski.\n\nOUTPUT (JSON):\n{\n  \"is_valid\": true/false,\n  \"issue\": \"fabricated_entity\" / \"contradiction\" / \"none\"\n}\n\nWYMAGANIA FORMATOWANIA:\n1. Odpowiedz WYŁĄCZNIE surowym obiektem JSON.\n2. NIE używaj bloków kodu Markdown.\n3. NIE dodawaj żadnych wstępów ani wyjaśnień przed ani po JSONie.\n4. JSON musi być poprawny i gotowy do parsowania.\n\n",
      "ai_response_raw": "{\n  \"is_valid\": true,\n  \"issue\": \"none\"\n}"
    },
    {
      "timestamp": "2026-03-13T12:23:40.536Z",
      "source_url": "https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/s3921/BILLS-119s3921is.htm",
      "model": "gemini-flash-latest",
      "prompt_sent": "\nJesteś ekspertem od prawa Stanów Zjednoczonych, który ma za zadanie analizować dokumenty ustaw, uchwał oraz innych dokumentów legislacyjnych, a następnie przygotowywać z nich informacje w przystępny sposób dla obywateli. Twoim celem jest przedstawienie informacji tak, aby obywatele mogli sami ocenić wpływ legislacji na ich życie, nawet bez posiadania specjalistycznej wiedzy legislacyjnej. Skup się na faktach i obiektywnych skutkach wprowadzanych zmian, unikając wartościowania i osobistych opinii. Wszelki żargon prawny jest zabroniony. Prezentuj informacje w jasny, zwięzły i angażujący sposób, tak aby były zrozumiałe dla osoby bez wykształcenia prawniczego. Unikaj długich, złożonych zdań. Zamiast pisać \"projekt ma na celu nowelizację kodeksu podatkowego...\", napisz \"Zmiany w podatkach: nowe ulgi i obowiązki dla...\". Kontynuuj swoją pracę, dopóki nie rozwiążesz swojego zadania. Jeśli nie masz pewności co do generowanej treści, przeanalizuj dokument ponownie – nie zgaduj. Rozplanuj dobrze swoje zadanie przed przystąpieniem do niego. W podsumowaniu i kluczowych punktach, jeśli to możliwe i uzasadnione, podkreśl, jakie konkretne korzyści lub skutki (pozytywne lub negatywne) wprowadza ustawa dla życia codziennego obywateli, ich praw i obowiązków, finansów osobistych, bezpieczeństwa i innych ważnych kwestii (np. kategorycznych zakazów i nakazów czy najważniejszych konkretnych alokacji finansowych i terytorialnych).\n\nTwoja odpowiedź MUSI być w formacie JSON - i zawierać następujące klucze.\nZanim zwrócisz odpowiedź, dokładnie zweryfikuj, czy cała struktura JSON jest w 100% poprawna, włącznie ze wszystkimi przecinkami, nawiasami klamrowymi, kwadratowymi oraz cudzysłowami. Błędny JSON jest nieakceptowalny i uniemożliwi przetworzenie Twojej pracy.\n\nPrzeanalizuj dokładnie poniższy tekst dokumentu prawnego. To jest treść, na podstawie której masz wygenerować podsumowanie i kluczowe punkty:\n--- POCZĄTEK DOKUMENTU ---\n[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [S. 3921 Introduced in Senate (IS)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session S. 3921 To establish eligibility requirements for the use of Federal funds for Special Event Assessment Rating support in sanctuary jurisdictions and to reallocate such funds to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement for immigration enforcement efforts. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES February 25, 2026 Mr. Scott of Florida introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To establish eligibility requirements for the use of Federal funds for Special Event Assessment Rating support in sanctuary jurisdictions and to reallocate such funds to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement for immigration enforcement efforts. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Sanctuary Jurisdiction Event Security Enhancement Act''. SEC. 2. FINDINGS. Congress finds the following: (1) The Special Event Assessment Rating program, which is administered by the Department of Homeland Security, assesses risks for major events to ensure public safety and national security. (2) Sanctuary jurisdictions, by limiting cooperation with Federal immigration enforcement, may hinder intelligence sharing and increase vulnerabilities at such events, including threats from illegal aliens potentially involved in terrorism or disruptions. (3) Examples of such increased vulnerabilities include more than 382 border encounters with individuals on terrorist watch lists along United States borders between fiscal years 2021 and 2024, inclusive, and historical cases of foreign-born terrorists illegally entering the United States plotting attacks against our country. (4) Conditioning SEAR support on compliance with immigration laws-- (A) promotes the general welfare of the American people; (B) is unambiguous; (C) directly relates to event security risks; (D) complies with all relevant provisions in the United States Constitution; (E) does not coerce compliance by sanctuary jurisdictions; and (F) is consistent with the holding by the United States Supreme Court in South Dakota v. Dole (483 U.S. 203 (1987)). SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS. In this Act: (1) Sanctuary jurisdiction.--The term ``sanctuary jurisdiction'' means a State or a political subdivision of a State that has in effect a statute, ordinance, policy, or practice that prohibits or restricts-- (A) sending, receiving, maintaining, or exchanging with any Federal, State, or local government entity information regarding the citizenship or immigration status (lawful or unlawful) of any individual; or (B) complying with a request lawfully made by the Department of Homeland Security under section 236 or 287 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1226 and 1357) to detain an alien. (2) SEAR support.--The term ``SEAR support'' means any Federal funds, grants, or resources provided by the Department of Homeland Security for Special Event Assessment Rating activities, including risk assessments, explosive detection teams, cyber support, or other security measures for voluntarily submitted events. SEC. 4. INELIGIBILITY OF SANCTUARY JURISDICTIONS FOR FEDERAL FUNDING FOR SEAR SUPPORT. (a) In General.--Subject to subsection (b) and notwithstanding any other provision of law, sanctuary jurisdictions are ineligible to receive Federal funds for SEAR support for events taking place in such jurisdictions, including funding from-- (1) the Department of Homeland Security's Office of Operations Coordination; or (2) related grant programs, such as the Homeland Security Grant Program. (b) Notification and Certification Requirements.--The ineligibility of a sanctuary jurisdiction to receive Federal funds described in subsection (a) shall not take effect unless-- (1) 30 days has elapsed since the sanctuary jurisdiction was notified by the Secretary of Homeland Security that it is a sanctuary jurisdiction; and (2) the sanctuary jurisdiction fails to certify to the Secretary of Homeland Security that it is in full compliance with the immigration laws (as defined in section 101(a)(17) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(17))), including section 642 of the Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (division C of Public Law 104-208; 8 U.S.C. 1373). SEC. 5. REALLOCATION. (a) In General.--An amount equal to the reduction in expenditures resulting from the ineligibility of certain sanctuary jurisdictions under section 4 shall be reallocated to Enforcement and Removal Operations of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. (b) Priority.--Of the amounts reallocated pursuant to subsection (a)-- (1) priority shall be given to immigration enforcement activities in response to public safety threats, including arrests, detentions, and deportations of convicted criminal noncitizens, gang members, and individuals on terrorist watch lists; and (2) at least 50 percent shall be expended for border- related removals and enforcement operations. SEC. 6. SEMIANNUAL REPORTS. The Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit semiannual reports to Congress detailing-- (1) the amount of funds that have been withheld pursuant to section 4; (2) the amount of funds that have been reallocated pursuant to section 5; (3) the impact such reallocations have had on enforcement outcomes, including the number of arrests, detentions, and deportations; and (4) the impact of this Act on reducing risks from illegal aliens at major events. SEC. 7. SEVERABILITY. If any provision of this Act, or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance, is held invalid, the remainder of this section, and the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances, shall not be affected. <all>\n--- KONIEC DOKUMENTU ---\n\nPAMIĘTAJ: Twoja odpowiedź MUSI być wyłącznie poprawnym obiektem JSON. Nie dodawaj żadnych dodatkowych znaków, komentarzy ani tekstu przed znacznikiem '{' ani po znaczniku '}'. Cała odpowiedź musi być parsowalna jako JSON.\nNa podstawie POWYŻSZEGO dokumentu, wypełnij poniższą strukturę JSON:\nOto struktura JSON, której oczekuję (wypełnij ją treścią):\n{\n  \"pl_ai_title\": \"Nowy, krótki tytuł dla aktu prawnego po polsku, oddający sedno wprowadzanych zmian (np. maksymalnie 10-12 słów).\",\n  \"pl_summary\": \"2-3 zdania zwięzłego podsumowania treści aktu prawnego po polsku, napisane z perspektywy wpływu na życie codzienne obywateli.\",\n  \"pl_key_points\": [\n    \"Pierwszy krótki punkt po polsku dotyczący najważniejszych wprowadzanych rozwiązań lub zmian.\",\n    \"Drugi krótki punkt po polsku...\"\n  ],\n  \"eng_ai_title\": \"A new, short title for the legal act in English, capturing the essence of the changes (e.g., max 10-12 words).\",\n  \"eng_summary\": \"2-3 sentences summarizing the legal act in English, from the perspective of its impact on citizens' daily lives.\",\n  \"eng_key_points\": [\n    \"First short bullet point in English regarding the most important solutions or changes being introduced.\",\n    \"Second short bullet point in English...\"\n  ],\n  \"de_ai_title\": \"Ein neuer, kurzer Titel für das Rechtsdokument auf Deutsch, der den Kern der Änderungen erfasst (z.B. max. 10-12 Wörter).\",\n  \"de_summary\": \"2-3 Sätze Zusammenfassung des Rechtsdokuments auf Deutsch, aus der Perspektive seiner Auswirkungen auf das tägliche Leben der Bürger.\",\n  \"de_key_points\": [\n    \"Erster kurzer Stichpunkt auf Deutsch zu den wichtigsten eingeführten Lösungen oder Änderungen.\",\n    \"Zweiter kurzer Stichpunkt auf Deutsch...\"\n  ],\n  \"fr_ai_title\": \"Un nouveau titre court pour l'acte juridique en français, saisissant l'essence des changements (par exemple, 10-12 mots maximum).\",\n  \"fr_summary\": \"Résumé de 2-3 phrases de l'acte juridique en français, du point de vue de son impact sur la vie quotidienne des citoyens.\",\n  \"fr_key_points\": [\n    \"Premier court point en français concernant les solutions ou changements les plus importants introduits.\",\n    \"Deuxième court point en français...\"\n  ],\n  \"es_ai_title\": \"Un nuevo título breve para el acto jurídico en español, que recoja la esencia de los cambios (por ejemplo, máximo 10-12 palabras).\",\n  \"es_summary\": \"Resumen de 2-3 frases del acto jurídico en español, desde la perspectiva de su impacto en la vida cotidiana de los ciudadanos.\",\n  \"es_key_points\": [\n    \"Primer punto breve en español sobre las soluciones o cambios más importantes que se introducen.\",\n    \"Segundo punto breve en español...\"\n  ],\n  \"it_ai_title\": \"Un nuovo titolo breve per l'atto giuridico in italiano, che colga l'essenza delle modifiche (ad es. massimo 10-12 parole).\",\n  \"it_summary\": \"Riepilogo di 2-3 frasi dell'atto giuridico in italiano, dal punto di vista del suo impatto sulla vita quotidiana dei cittadini.\",\n  \"it_key_points\": [\n    \"Primo breve punto in italiano riguardante le soluzioni o le modifiche più importanti introdotte.\",\n    \"Secondo breve punto in italiano...\"\n  ],\n  \"nl_ai_title\": \"Een nieuwe, korte titel voor de rechtshandeling in het Nederlands, die de essentie van de wijzigingen weergeeft (bijv. max. 10-12 woorden).\",\n  \"nl_summary\": \"Samenvatting van 2-3 zinnen van de rechtshandeling in het Nederlands, vanuit het perspectief van de impact op het dagelijks leven van burgers.\",\n  \"nl_key_points\": [\n    \"Eerste korte punt in het Nederlands betreffende de belangrijkste geïntroduceerde oplossingen of wijzigingen.\",\n    \"Tweede korte punt in het Nederlands...\"\n  ],\n  \"pt_ai_title\": \"Um novo título curto para o ato jurídico em português, capturando a essência das mudanças (por exemplo, máx. 10-12 palavras).\",\n  \"pt_summary\": \"Resumo de 2-3 frases do ato jurídico em português, na perspetiva do seu impacto na vida quotidiana dos cidadãos.\",\n  \"pt_key_points\": [\n    \"Primeiro ponto curto em português sobre as soluções ou alterações mais importantes introduzidas.\",\n    \"Segundo ponto curto em português...\"\n  ],\n  \"category\": [\"Categorize the document into one category by default, based on the field it primarily concerns. Choose up to 3 if the document also touches upon SIGNIFICANT issues from other categories. You MUST select categories ONLY from the following list: Health, Education, Family, Taxes, Labor, Security, Environment, Courts and Law, Transport, Benefits, Real Estate, Media and Culture, Local Government, Migration, Agriculture, Public Investments, Informatization, Economy. If the document does not definitively fit any of these, you MUST use \"Other\". If you use \"Other\", it should be the ONLY category selected. Do NOT invent new categories. The response must be an array of strings, e.g., [\"Taxes\", \"Family\"].\"]\n}\n\n",
      "ai_response_raw": "{\n  \"pl_ai_title\": \"Ograniczenie funduszy na bezpieczeństwo imprez dla miast odmawiających współpracy z urzędem imigracyjnym\",\n  \"pl_summary\": \"Ustawa odbiera fundusze federalne na zabezpieczenie dużych wydarzeń miastom i stanom, które nie współpracują z federalnymi służbami imigracyjnymi. Zaoszczędzone pieniądze zostaną przekazane służbom ICE na aresztowania i deportacje osób przebywających w kraju nielegalnie.\",\n  \"pl_key_points\": [\n    \"Miasta uznane za 'azylanckie' stracą dostęp do federalnych dotacji na ochronę imprez masowych (np. wsparcie antyterrorystyczne czy cybernetyczne).\",\n    \"Wszystkie odebrane fundusze zostaną przekazane do służb imigracyjnych (ICE) na działania związane z zatrzymaniami i wydaleniami z kraju.\",\n    \"Priorytetem w finansowaniu będą deportacje osób skazanych za przestępstwa, członków gangów oraz osób z list obserwowanych terrorystów.\",\n    \"Co najmniej połowa przekazanych środków musi zostać wydana na operacje związane z usuwaniem osób bezpośrednio przy granicach USA.\"\n  ],\n  \"eng_ai_title\": \"Restricting Event Security Funding for Sanctuary Jurisdictions\",\n  \"eng_summary\": \"This bill cuts federal security funding for major events in cities and states that do not cooperate with federal immigration authorities. These funds will be redirected to ICE for immigration enforcement, including arrests and deportations.\",\n  \"eng_key_points\": [\n    \"Jurisdictions labeled as 'sanctuary jurisdictions' will lose federal grants and resources for securing large-scale events.\",\n    \"Withheld funds will be reallocated to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for enforcement and removal operations.\",\n    \"Priority for the reallocated funds will be given to the arrest and deportation of criminal noncitizens and suspected terrorists.\",\n    \"At least 50 percent of the redirected money must be used specifically for border-related enforcement and removals.\"\n  ],\n  \"de_ai_title\": \"Kürzung der Sicherheitsmittel für Großveranstaltungen in „Sanctuary Jurisdictions“\",\n  \"de_summary\": \"Dieses Gesetz entzieht Städten und Bundesstaaten, die nicht mit den Einwanderungsbehörden zusammenarbeiten, Bundesmittel für die Sicherung von Großveranstaltungen. Das Geld wird stattdessen der ICE für Verhaftungen und Abschiebungen zur Verfügung gestellt.\",\n  \"de_key_points\": [\n    \"Städte, die die Zusammenarbeit mit Einwanderungsbehörden einschränken, verlieren Bundeszuschüsse für die Sicherheit bei Massenveranstaltungen.\",\n    \"Die einbehaltenen Mittel werden an die Einwanderungsbehörde ICE für Festnahmen und Abschiebungen umgeleitet.\",\n    \"Vorrang bei der Mittelverwendung hat die Abschiebung von kriminellen Ausländern, Gangmitgliedern und Terrorverdächtigen.\",\n    \"Mindestens 50 % der umverteilten Gelder müssen für Abschiebungsmaßnahmen im Zusammenhang mit der Grenze verwendet werden.\"\n  ],\n  \"fr_ai_title\": \"Restriction du financement de la sécurité des événements pour les juridictions sanctuaires\",\n  \"fr_summary\": \"Ce projet de loi supprime les fonds fédéraux pour la sécurité des grands événements dans les villes qui ne coopèrent pas avec les autorités d'immigration. Ces fonds seront réaffectés à l'ICE pour les arrestations et les expulsions.\",\n  \"fr_key_points\": [\n    \"Les villes refusant de partager des informations sur le statut migratoire perdent le soutien fédéral pour la sécurité des événements publics.\",\n    \"Les fonds non versés sont transférés aux services d'immigration (ICE) pour financer les opérations d'expulsion.\",\n    \"La priorité est donnée à l'expulsion des criminels, des membres de gangs et des personnes figurant sur les listes de surveillance terroriste.\",\n    \"Au moins 50 % des fonds réaffectés doivent être consacrés aux opérations d'expulsion liées à la frontière.\"\n  ],\n  \"es_ai_title\": \"Restricción de fondos de seguridad para eventos en jurisdicciones santuario\",\n  \"es_summary\": \"Esta ley elimina los fondos federales para la seguridad de grandes eventos en ciudades que no cooperan con las autoridades de inmigración. El dinero se redirigirá al ICE para labores de arresto y deportación.\",\n  \"es_key_points\": [\n    \"Las ciudades que limiten la cooperación con inmigración perderán subsidios federales para la protección de eventos masivos.\",\n    \"Los fondos retirados se reasignarán al ICE para financiar detenciones y operaciones de expulsión del país.\",\n    \"Se dará prioridad a la deportación de delincuentes, miembros de pandillas y personas en listas de vigilancia terrorista.\",\n    \"Al menos el 50% de los recursos reasignados debe gastarse en operaciones de control y expulsión en la frontera.\"\n  ],\n  \"it_ai_title\": \"Restrizione dei fondi per la sicurezza degli eventi nelle giurisdizioni santuario\",\n  \"it_summary\": \"Questa legge revoca i fondi federali per la sicurezza dei grandi eventi nelle città che non collaborano con le autorità per l'immigrazione. Tali risorse saranno destinate all'ICE per attività di arresto ed espulsione.\",\n  \"it_key_points\": [\n    \"Le città che non collaborano con il governo federale sull'immigrazione perdono i fondi per la sicurezza degli eventi pubblici.\",\n    \"I fondi risparmiati saranno trasferiti all'ICE per finanziare arresti, detenzioni e rimpatri.\",\n    \"La priorità sarà data all'espulsione di stranieri con precedenti penali, membri di bande e sospetti terroristi.\",\n    \"Almeno il 50% dei fondi riallocati deve essere utilizzato per operazioni di espulsione legate ai confini.\"\n  ],\n  \"nl_ai_title\": \"Beperking van beveiligingsfondsen voor evenementen in sanctuary-steden\",\n  \"nl_summary\": \"Deze wet schrapt federale financiering voor de beveiliging van grote evenementen in steden die niet meewerken aan immigratiehandhaving. Dit geld wordt herverdeeld naar ICE voor arrestaties en deportaties.\",\n  \"nl_key_points\": [\n    \"Steden die weigeren informatie over immigratiestatus te delen, verliezen federale steun voor de beveiliging van evenementen.\",\n    \"Ingehouden middelen worden overgedragen aan ICE voor handhavings- en uitzettingsoperaties.\",\n    \"Prioriteit ligt bij het deporteren van veroordeelde criminelen, bendeleden en personen op terrorisme-observatielijsten.\",\n    \"Ten minste 50 procent van de herverdeelde middelen moet worden besteed aan grensgerelateerde handhaving en uitzettingen.\"\n  ],\n  \"pt_ai_title\": \"Restrição de fundos de segurança para eventos em jurisdições santuário\",\n  \"pt_summary\": \"Esta lei retira fundos federais para a segurança de grandes eventos em cidades que não cooperam com as autoridades de imigração. O dinheiro será redirecionado para o ICE para fins de detenção e deportação.\",\n  \"pt_key_points\": [\n    \"Cidades que restringem a cooperação com a fiscalização de imigração perdem subsídios federais para segurança de eventos.\",\n    \"Os fundos retidos serão transferidos para o ICE para financiar prisões e operações de remoção.\",\n    \"A prioridade será dada à deportação de criminosos, membros de gangues e indivíduos em listas de vigilância terrorista.\",\n    \"Pelo menos 50% dos recursos devem ser aplicados em operações de fiscalização e remoção na fronteira.\"\n  ],\n  \"category\": [\"Migration\", \"Security\"]\n}"
    }
  ]
}