{
  "legislationId": "119_S_4091",
  "lastUpdate": "2026-03-25T12:31:47.419Z",
  "history": [
    {
      "timestamp": "2026-03-25T12:31:47.419Z",
      "source_url": "https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/s4091/BILLS-119s4091is.htm",
      "model": "gemini-flash-lite-latest",
      "prompt_sent": "\nROLE: Fact Checker.\nZADANIE: Porównaj SOURCE (oryginał) i SUMMARY (streszczenie przygotowane przez inne AI).\n\nTwoim celem jest wykrycie \"ZMYŚLONYCH KONKRETÓW\" (Fabricated Entities) w SUMMARY.\n\nSOURCE:\n[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [S. 4091 Introduced in Senate (IS)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session S. 4091 To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to improve wildlife habitat connectivity and wildlife migration corridors, and for other purposes. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES March 12, 2026 Mr. Heinrich (for himself and Mr. Sheehy) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to improve wildlife habitat connectivity and wildlife migration corridors, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Habitat Connectivity on Working Lands Act of 2026''. SEC. 2. CONSERVATION PROGRAMS. (a) Definition of Native Big Game Species.--Section 1201(a) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3801(a)) is amended-- (1) by redesignating paragraphs (18) through (27) as paragraphs (19) through (28), respectively; and (2) by inserting after paragraph (17) the following: ``(18) Native big game species.--The term `native big game species' means a native species of a large mammal, including a wild deer, an elk, a pronghorn, a wild sheep, and a moose.''. (b) Regional Conservation Partnership Program Critical Conservation Areas.--Section 1271F(a)(2)(C) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3871f(a)(2)(C)) is amended by inserting ``, including restoration and enhancement of wildlife habitat connectivity and wildlife migration corridors, with a focus on native big game species'' before ``; and''. (c) Enrollment in the Environmental Quality Incentives Program and the Conservation Stewardship Program of Grassland Enrolled in the Conservation Reserve Program.-- (1) Environmental quality incentives program.--Section 1240B(d) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3839aa- 2(d)) is amended-- (A) in paragraph (6), by striking ``A producer'' and inserting ``Except as provided in paragraph (8), a producer''; and (B) by adding at the end the following: ``(8) Cost-share payments for grassland enrolled in the conservation reserve program.-- ``(A) In general.--The Secretary may provide payments under the program for costs associated with planning, design, materials, equipment, installation, labor, management, maintenance, or training with respect to eligible land that is-- ``(i) enrolled in the conservation reserve program under section 1231(d)(2)(A); and ``(ii) of ecological significance, as described in section 1231(d)(2)(B)(iii). ``(B) Limitations.-- ``(i) Other federal programs.--A producer shall not be eligible for payments under subparagraph (A) for practices if the producer receives payments or other benefits for the same practice on the same land under another Federal program (other than the conservation reserve program under subchapter B of chapter 1). ``(ii) Protection of emergency grazing and haying.--An activity to restore or enhance wildlife habitat connectivity or wildlife migration corridors carried out using a payment under subparagraph (A) shall not prevent or alter emergency haying or emergency grazing carried out in accordance with the requirements of the conservation reserve program under subchapter B of chapter 1.''. (2) Conservation stewardship program.--Section 1240J(b) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3839aa-22(b)) is amended-- (A) in paragraph (1), in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by inserting ``and except as provided in paragraph (3),'' after ``paragraph (2),''; and (B) by adding at the end the following: ``(3) Cost-share payments for grassland enrolled in the conservation reserve program.-- ``(A) In general.--The Secretary may provide payments under the program for costs associated with planning, design, materials, equipment, installation, labor, management, maintenance, or training with respect to eligible land that is-- ``(i) enrolled in the conservation reserve program under section 1231(d)(2)(A); and ``(ii) of ecological significance, as described in section 1231(d)(2)(B)(iii). ``(B) Limitations.-- ``(i) Other federal programs.--A producer shall not be eligible for payments under subparagraph (A) for conservation activities if the producer receives payments or other benefits for the same conservation activities on the same land under another Federal program (other than the conservation reserve program under subchapter B of chapter 1). ``(ii) Protection of emergency grazing and haying.--An activity to restore or enhance wildlife habitat connectivity or wildlife migration corridors carried out using a payment under subparagraph (A) shall not prevent or alter emergency haying or emergency grazing carried out in accordance with the requirements of the conservation reserve program under subchapter B of chapter 1.''. (3) Payment limitation for rental payments under the conservation reserve program.--Section 1234(g)(1) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3834(g)(1)) is amended by striking ``$50,000'' and inserting ``$125,000''. (d) Increased Payments Under the Environmental Quality Incentives Program.--Section 1240B(d) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3839aa-2(d)) is amended-- (1) in paragraph (3)(F), by inserting ``and wildlife habitat connectivity'' before ``; or''; and (2) in paragraph (7)(A)-- (A) in clause (iii), by striking ``or'' at the end; (B) in clause (iv), by striking the period at the end and inserting ``; or''; and (C) by adding at the end the following: ``(v) addresses the conservation and restoration of wildlife habitat, including wildlife habitat connectivity and wildlife migration corridors.''. (e) Conservation Practice Standards.--Section 1242 of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3842) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``(j) Addressing Barriers to Habitat Connectivity.-- ``(1) In general.--The Secretary shall-- ``(A) to the maximum extent practicable, fully incorporate nonstructural methods to manage livestock distribution, such as virtual fencing, into the conservation practice standards; and ``(B) provide for the appropriate range of conservation practices and resource mitigation measures available to landowners using nonstructural methods described in subparagraph (A). ``(2) Availability of adequate technical assistance.--The Secretary shall ensure that adequate technical assistance is available for the implementation of-- ``(A) nonstructural methods described in paragraph (1)(A); and ``(B) other practices that support habitat connectivity through Federal conservation programs.''. (f) Administrative Requirements for Conservation Programs.--Section 1244 of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3844) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``(q) Encouragement of Habitat Connectivity and Native Big Game Migration Corridors.--In carrying out any conservation program administered by the Secretary, the Secretary may, as appropriate, encourage-- ``(1) the conservation of landscape corridors and hydrologic connectivity, where native big game species and ecological processes can transition from one habitat to another, in order to conserve native biodiversity and ensure resiliency against impacts from a range of stressors; and ``(2) the use of conservation practices that support the development, restoration, and maintenance of landscape corridors and hydrologic connectivity.''. SEC. 3. HIGH-PRIORITY RESEARCH AND EXTENSION AREAS. Section 1672(d) of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 (7 U.S.C. 5925(d)) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``(21) Virtual fencing.--Research and extension grants may be made under this section for the purposes of-- ``(A) understanding and addressing the barriers to the adoption of virtual fencing technology; or ``(B) studying the effects of virtual fencing technology on-- ``(i) natural and cultural resources, such as-- ``(I) sensitive riparian areas; and ``(II) crucial winter range and stopover habitats for native big game species (as defined in section 1201(a) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3801(a))); or ``(ii) overall range health.''. <all>\n\nSUMMARY TO EVALUATE:\nTitle: Habitat Connectivity on Working Lands Act of 2026\nSummary: This bill helps farmers and ranchers protect wildlife migration routes for animals like elk and deer through new financial incentives. It introduces modern tools like virtual fencing to balance agricultural production with nature conservation.\nKey Points: Defines native big game species, such as deer and moose, to prioritize their conservation on agricultural lands., Increases the annual payment limit for land conservation programs from $50,000 to $125,000., Promotes the use of virtual fencing as a non-structural method to manage livestock without blocking wildlife., Provides cost-share payments for restoring wildlife habitat connectivity and migration corridors., Allocates grants for research on how new fencing technologies affect natural resources and animal habitats.\n\nZASADY OCENY:\n1. Sprawdź wszystkie LICZBY, DATY i KWOTY w SUMMARY. Jeśli którejś brakuje w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n2. Sprawdź wszystkie NAZWISKA, ORGANIZACJE i MIEJSCA w SUMMARY. Jeśli którejś brakuje w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n3. Sprawdź wszystkie konkretne DZIAŁANIA PRAWNE . Jeśli tego mechanizmu nie ma w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n\nWAŻNE: Abstrakcyjne pojęcia (np. \"transparentność\", \"zaufanie\") są dozwolone jako wnioski.\n\nOUTPUT (JSON):\n{\n  \"is_valid\": true/false,\n  \"issue\": \"fabricated_entity\" / \"contradiction\" / \"none\"\n}\n\nWYMAGANIA FORMATOWANIA:\n1. Odpowiedz WYŁĄCZNIE surowym obiektem JSON.\n2. NIE używaj bloków kodu Markdown.\n3. NIE dodawaj żadnych wstępów ani wyjaśnień przed ani po JSONie.\n4. JSON musi być poprawny i gotowy do parsowania.\n\n",
      "ai_response_raw": "{\n  \"is_valid\": true,\n  \"issue\": \"none\"\n}"
    },
    {
      "timestamp": "2026-03-25T12:20:06.107Z",
      "source_url": "https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/s4091/BILLS-119s4091is.htm",
      "model": "gemini-flash-latest",
      "prompt_sent": "\nJesteś ekspertem od prawa Stanów Zjednoczonych, który ma za zadanie analizować dokumenty ustaw, uchwał oraz innych dokumentów legislacyjnych, a następnie przygotowywać z nich informacje w przystępny sposób dla obywateli. Twoim celem jest przedstawienie informacji tak, aby obywatele mogli sami ocenić wpływ legislacji na ich życie, nawet bez posiadania specjalistycznej wiedzy legislacyjnej. Skup się na faktach i obiektywnych skutkach wprowadzanych zmian, unikając wartościowania i osobistych opinii. Wszelki żargon prawny jest zabroniony. Prezentuj informacje w jasny, zwięzły i angażujący sposób, tak aby były zrozumiałe dla osoby bez wykształcenia prawniczego. Unikaj długich, złożonych zdań. Zamiast pisać \"projekt ma na celu nowelizację kodeksu podatkowego...\", napisz \"Zmiany w podatkach: nowe ulgi i obowiązki dla...\". Kontynuuj swoją pracę, dopóki nie rozwiążesz swojego zadania. Jeśli nie masz pewności co do generowanej treści, przeanalizuj dokument ponownie – nie zgaduj. Rozplanuj dobrze swoje zadanie przed przystąpieniem do niego. W podsumowaniu i kluczowych punktach, jeśli to możliwe i uzasadnione, podkreśl, jakie konkretne korzyści lub skutki (pozytywne lub negatywne) wprowadza ustawa dla życia codziennego obywateli, ich praw i obowiązków, finansów osobistych, bezpieczeństwa i innych ważnych kwestii (np. kategorycznych zakazów i nakazów czy najważniejszych konkretnych alokacji finansowych i terytorialnych).\n\nTwoja odpowiedź MUSI być w formacie JSON - i zawierać następujące klucze.\nZanim zwrócisz odpowiedź, dokładnie zweryfikuj, czy cała struktura JSON jest w 100% poprawna, włącznie ze wszystkimi przecinkami, nawiasami klamrowymi, kwadratowymi oraz cudzysłowami. Błędny JSON jest nieakceptowalny i uniemożliwi przetworzenie Twojej pracy.\n\nPrzeanalizuj dokładnie poniższy tekst dokumentu prawnego. To jest treść, na podstawie której masz wygenerować podsumowanie i kluczowe punkty:\n--- POCZĄTEK DOKUMENTU ---\n[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [S. 4091 Introduced in Senate (IS)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session S. 4091 To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to improve wildlife habitat connectivity and wildlife migration corridors, and for other purposes. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES March 12, 2026 Mr. Heinrich (for himself and Mr. Sheehy) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to improve wildlife habitat connectivity and wildlife migration corridors, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Habitat Connectivity on Working Lands Act of 2026''. SEC. 2. CONSERVATION PROGRAMS. (a) Definition of Native Big Game Species.--Section 1201(a) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3801(a)) is amended-- (1) by redesignating paragraphs (18) through (27) as paragraphs (19) through (28), respectively; and (2) by inserting after paragraph (17) the following: ``(18) Native big game species.--The term `native big game species' means a native species of a large mammal, including a wild deer, an elk, a pronghorn, a wild sheep, and a moose.''. (b) Regional Conservation Partnership Program Critical Conservation Areas.--Section 1271F(a)(2)(C) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3871f(a)(2)(C)) is amended by inserting ``, including restoration and enhancement of wildlife habitat connectivity and wildlife migration corridors, with a focus on native big game species'' before ``; and''. (c) Enrollment in the Environmental Quality Incentives Program and the Conservation Stewardship Program of Grassland Enrolled in the Conservation Reserve Program.-- (1) Environmental quality incentives program.--Section 1240B(d) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3839aa- 2(d)) is amended-- (A) in paragraph (6), by striking ``A producer'' and inserting ``Except as provided in paragraph (8), a producer''; and (B) by adding at the end the following: ``(8) Cost-share payments for grassland enrolled in the conservation reserve program.-- ``(A) In general.--The Secretary may provide payments under the program for costs associated with planning, design, materials, equipment, installation, labor, management, maintenance, or training with respect to eligible land that is-- ``(i) enrolled in the conservation reserve program under section 1231(d)(2)(A); and ``(ii) of ecological significance, as described in section 1231(d)(2)(B)(iii). ``(B) Limitations.-- ``(i) Other federal programs.--A producer shall not be eligible for payments under subparagraph (A) for practices if the producer receives payments or other benefits for the same practice on the same land under another Federal program (other than the conservation reserve program under subchapter B of chapter 1). ``(ii) Protection of emergency grazing and haying.--An activity to restore or enhance wildlife habitat connectivity or wildlife migration corridors carried out using a payment under subparagraph (A) shall not prevent or alter emergency haying or emergency grazing carried out in accordance with the requirements of the conservation reserve program under subchapter B of chapter 1.''. (2) Conservation stewardship program.--Section 1240J(b) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3839aa-22(b)) is amended-- (A) in paragraph (1), in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by inserting ``and except as provided in paragraph (3),'' after ``paragraph (2),''; and (B) by adding at the end the following: ``(3) Cost-share payments for grassland enrolled in the conservation reserve program.-- ``(A) In general.--The Secretary may provide payments under the program for costs associated with planning, design, materials, equipment, installation, labor, management, maintenance, or training with respect to eligible land that is-- ``(i) enrolled in the conservation reserve program under section 1231(d)(2)(A); and ``(ii) of ecological significance, as described in section 1231(d)(2)(B)(iii). ``(B) Limitations.-- ``(i) Other federal programs.--A producer shall not be eligible for payments under subparagraph (A) for conservation activities if the producer receives payments or other benefits for the same conservation activities on the same land under another Federal program (other than the conservation reserve program under subchapter B of chapter 1). ``(ii) Protection of emergency grazing and haying.--An activity to restore or enhance wildlife habitat connectivity or wildlife migration corridors carried out using a payment under subparagraph (A) shall not prevent or alter emergency haying or emergency grazing carried out in accordance with the requirements of the conservation reserve program under subchapter B of chapter 1.''. (3) Payment limitation for rental payments under the conservation reserve program.--Section 1234(g)(1) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3834(g)(1)) is amended by striking ``$50,000'' and inserting ``$125,000''. (d) Increased Payments Under the Environmental Quality Incentives Program.--Section 1240B(d) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3839aa-2(d)) is amended-- (1) in paragraph (3)(F), by inserting ``and wildlife habitat connectivity'' before ``; or''; and (2) in paragraph (7)(A)-- (A) in clause (iii), by striking ``or'' at the end; (B) in clause (iv), by striking the period at the end and inserting ``; or''; and (C) by adding at the end the following: ``(v) addresses the conservation and restoration of wildlife habitat, including wildlife habitat connectivity and wildlife migration corridors.''. (e) Conservation Practice Standards.--Section 1242 of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3842) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``(j) Addressing Barriers to Habitat Connectivity.-- ``(1) In general.--The Secretary shall-- ``(A) to the maximum extent practicable, fully incorporate nonstructural methods to manage livestock distribution, such as virtual fencing, into the conservation practice standards; and ``(B) provide for the appropriate range of conservation practices and resource mitigation measures available to landowners using nonstructural methods described in subparagraph (A). ``(2) Availability of adequate technical assistance.--The Secretary shall ensure that adequate technical assistance is available for the implementation of-- ``(A) nonstructural methods described in paragraph (1)(A); and ``(B) other practices that support habitat connectivity through Federal conservation programs.''. (f) Administrative Requirements for Conservation Programs.--Section 1244 of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3844) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``(q) Encouragement of Habitat Connectivity and Native Big Game Migration Corridors.--In carrying out any conservation program administered by the Secretary, the Secretary may, as appropriate, encourage-- ``(1) the conservation of landscape corridors and hydrologic connectivity, where native big game species and ecological processes can transition from one habitat to another, in order to conserve native biodiversity and ensure resiliency against impacts from a range of stressors; and ``(2) the use of conservation practices that support the development, restoration, and maintenance of landscape corridors and hydrologic connectivity.''. SEC. 3. HIGH-PRIORITY RESEARCH AND EXTENSION AREAS. Section 1672(d) of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 (7 U.S.C. 5925(d)) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``(21) Virtual fencing.--Research and extension grants may be made under this section for the purposes of-- ``(A) understanding and addressing the barriers to the adoption of virtual fencing technology; or ``(B) studying the effects of virtual fencing technology on-- ``(i) natural and cultural resources, such as-- ``(I) sensitive riparian areas; and ``(II) crucial winter range and stopover habitats for native big game species (as defined in section 1201(a) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3801(a))); or ``(ii) overall range health.''. <all>\n--- KONIEC DOKUMENTU ---\n\nPAMIĘTAJ: Twoja odpowiedź MUSI być wyłącznie poprawnym obiektem JSON. Nie dodawaj żadnych dodatkowych znaków, komentarzy ani tekstu przed znacznikiem '{' ani po znaczniku '}'. Cała odpowiedź musi być parsowalna jako JSON.\nNa podstawie POWYŻSZEGO dokumentu, wypełnij poniższą strukturę JSON:\nOto struktura JSON, której oczekuję (wypełnij ją treścią):\n{\n  \"pl_ai_title\": \"Nowy, krótki tytuł dla aktu prawnego po polsku, oddający sedno wprowadzanych zmian (np. maksymalnie 10-12 słów).\",\n  \"pl_summary\": \"2-3 zdania zwięzłego podsumowania treści aktu prawnego po polsku, napisane z perspektywy wpływu na życie codzienne obywateli.\",\n  \"pl_key_points\": [\n    \"Pierwszy krótki punkt po polsku dotyczący najważniejszych wprowadzanych rozwiązań lub zmian.\",\n    \"Drugi krótki punkt po polsku...\"\n  ],\n  \"eng_ai_title\": \"A new, short title for the legal act in English, capturing the essence of the changes (e.g., max 10-12 words).\",\n  \"eng_summary\": \"2-3 sentences summarizing the legal act in English, from the perspective of its impact on citizens' daily lives.\",\n  \"eng_key_points\": [\n    \"First short bullet point in English regarding the most important solutions or changes being introduced.\",\n    \"Second short bullet point in English...\"\n  ],\n  \"de_ai_title\": \"Ein neuer, kurzer Titel für das Rechtsdokument auf Deutsch, der den Kern der Änderungen erfasst (z.B. max. 10-12 Wörter).\",\n  \"de_summary\": \"2-3 Sätze Zusammenfassung des Rechtsdokuments auf Deutsch, aus der Perspektive seiner Auswirkungen auf das tägliche Leben der Bürger.\",\n  \"de_key_points\": [\n    \"Erster kurzer Stichpunkt auf Deutsch zu den wichtigsten eingeführten Lösungen oder Änderungen.\",\n    \"Zweiter kurzer Stichpunkt auf Deutsch...\"\n  ],\n  \"fr_ai_title\": \"Un nouveau titre court pour l'acte juridique en français, saisissant l'essence des changements (par exemple, 10-12 mots maximum).\",\n  \"fr_summary\": \"Résumé de 2-3 phrases de l'acte juridique en français, du point de vue de son impact sur la vie quotidienne des citoyens.\",\n  \"fr_key_points\": [\n    \"Premier court point en français concernant les solutions ou changements les plus importants introduits.\",\n    \"Deuxième court point en français...\"\n  ],\n  \"es_ai_title\": \"Un nuevo título breve para el acto jurídico en español, que recoja la esencia de los cambios (por ejemplo, máximo 10-12 palabras).\",\n  \"es_summary\": \"Resumen de 2-3 frases del acto jurídico en español, desde la perspectiva de su impacto en la vida cotidiana de los ciudadanos.\",\n  \"es_key_points\": [\n    \"Primer punto breve en español sobre las soluciones o cambios más importantes que se introducen.\",\n    \"Segundo punto breve en español...\"\n  ],\n  \"it_ai_title\": \"Un nuovo titolo breve per l'atto giuridico in italiano, che colga l'essenza delle modifiche (ad es. massimo 10-12 parole).\",\n  \"it_summary\": \"Riepilogo di 2-3 frasi dell'atto giuridico in italiano, dal punto di vista del suo impatto sulla vita quotidiana dei cittadini.\",\n  \"it_key_points\": [\n    \"Primo breve punto in italiano riguardante le soluzioni o le modifiche più importanti introdotte.\",\n    \"Secondo breve punto in italiano...\"\n  ],\n  \"nl_ai_title\": \"Een nieuwe, korte titel voor de rechtshandeling in het Nederlands, die de essentie van de wijzigingen weergeeft (bijv. max. 10-12 woorden).\",\n  \"nl_summary\": \"Samenvatting van 2-3 zinnen van de rechtshandeling in het Nederlands, vanuit het perspectief van de impact op het dagelijks leven van burgers.\",\n  \"nl_key_points\": [\n    \"Eerste korte punt in het Nederlands betreffende de belangrijkste geïntroduceerde oplossingen of wijzigingen.\",\n    \"Tweede korte punt in het Nederlands...\"\n  ],\n  \"pt_ai_title\": \"Um novo título curto para o ato jurídico em português, capturando a essência das mudanças (por exemplo, máx. 10-12 palavras).\",\n  \"pt_summary\": \"Resumo de 2-3 frases do ato jurídico em português, na perspetiva do seu impacto na vida quotidiana dos cidadãos.\",\n  \"pt_key_points\": [\n    \"Primeiro ponto curto em português sobre as soluções ou alterações mais importantes introduzidas.\",\n    \"Segundo ponto curto em português...\"\n  ],\n  \"category\": [\"Categorize the document into one category by default, based on the field it primarily concerns. Choose up to 3 if the document also touches upon SIGNIFICANT issues from other categories. You MUST select categories ONLY from the following list: Health, Education, Family, Taxes, Labor, Security, Environment, Courts and Law, Transport, Benefits, Real Estate, Media and Culture, Local Government, Migration, Agriculture, Public Investments, Informatization, Economy. If the document does not definitively fit any of these, you MUST use \"Other\". If you use \"Other\", it should be the ONLY category selected. Do NOT invent new categories. The response must be an array of strings, e.g., [\"Taxes\", \"Family\"].\"]\n}\n\n",
      "ai_response_raw": "{\n  \"pl_ai_title\": \"Ustawa o ochronie korytarzy migracyjnych zwierząt na terenach rolniczych 2026\",\n  \"pl_summary\": \"Ustawa wspiera rolników w ochronie szlaków migracyjnych dzikich zwierząt, takich jak jelenie czy łosie, poprzez nowe dopłaty i technologie. Zwiększa ona limity finansowe dla programów ochrony gruntów, co pozwala na lepsze zarządzanie przyrodą bez przerywania produkcji rolnej.\",\n  \"pl_key_points\": [\n    \"Wprowadzenie definicji rodzimych gatunków grubej zwierzyny (np. jelenie, łosie, owce dzikie) w celu ich lepszej ochrony.\",\n    \"Zwiększenie rocznego limitu płatności dla rolników w programach ochrony gruntów z 50 000 USD do 125 000 USD.\",\n    \"Wsparcie finansowe dla stosowania wirtualnych ogrodzeń, które nie blokują fizycznie przejścia zwierzętom.\",\n    \"Nowe fundusze na odtwarzanie i utrzymanie korytarzy migracyjnych oraz łączności siedlisk na gruntach prywatnych.\",\n    \"Zapewnienie pomocy technicznej dla rolników wdrażających nowoczesne metody ochrony przyrody.\"\n  ],\n  \"eng_ai_title\": \"Habitat Connectivity on Working Lands Act of 2026\",\n  \"eng_summary\": \"This bill helps farmers and ranchers protect wildlife migration routes for animals like elk and deer through new financial incentives. It introduces modern tools like virtual fencing to balance agricultural production with nature conservation.\",\n  \"eng_key_points\": [\n    \"Defines native big game species, such as deer and moose, to prioritize their conservation on agricultural lands.\",\n    \"Increases the annual payment limit for land conservation programs from $50,000 to $125,000.\",\n    \"Promotes the use of virtual fencing as a non-structural method to manage livestock without blocking wildlife.\",\n    \"Provides cost-share payments for restoring wildlife habitat connectivity and migration corridors.\",\n    \"Allocates grants for research on how new fencing technologies affect natural resources and animal habitats.\"\n  ],\n  \"de_ai_title\": \"Gesetz zur Vernetzung von Lebensräumen auf landwirtschaftlichen Flächen 2026\",\n  \"de_summary\": \"Dieses Gesetz unterstützt Landwirte dabei, Wanderwege für Wildtiere wie Hirsche und Elche durch neue finanzielle Anreize zu schützen. Es fördert moderne Technologien wie virtuelle Zäune, um die Landwirtschaft mit dem Naturschutz in Einklang zu bringen.\",\n  \"de_key_points\": [\n    \"Definition heimischer Großwildarten für gezielten Schutz auf landwirtschaftlichen Nutzflächen.\",\n    \"Erhöhung der jährlichen Zahlungsgrenzen für Naturschutzprogramme von 50.000 USD auf 125.000 USD.\",\n    \"Förderung virtueller Zäune, um die Bewegung von Wildtieren nicht durch physische Barrieren zu behindern.\",\n    \"Finanzielle Unterstützung für die Wiederherstellung ökologischer Korridore und der Vernetzung von Lebensräumen.\",\n    \"Bereitstellung technischer Hilfe für Landwirte bei der Umsetzung moderner Naturschutzpraktiken.\"\n  ],\n  \"fr_ai_title\": \"Loi de 2026 sur la connectivité des habitats sur les terres agricoles\",\n  \"fr_summary\": \"Cette loi aide les agriculteurs à protéger les routes de migration de la faune, comme les cerfs et les élans, grâce à de nouvelles incitations financières. Elle introduit des outils modernes comme les clôtures virtuelles pour concilier production agricole et protection de la nature.\",\n  \"fr_key_points\": [\n    \"Définition des espèces de gros gibier indigènes pour prioriser leur conservation sur les terres privées.\",\n    \"Augmentation du plafond des paiements annuels pour les programmes de conservation de 50 000 $ à 125 000 $.\",\n    \"Promotion des clôtures virtuelles pour gérer le bétail sans créer d'obstacles physiques pour la faune.\",\n    \"Soutien financier pour la restauration des corridors de migration et de la connectivité des habitats.\",\n    \"Octroi de subventions pour la recherche sur l'impact des nouvelles technologies de clôture sur l'environnement.\"\n  ],\n  \"es_ai_title\": \"Ley de Conectividad de Hábitats en Tierras de Trabajo de 2026\",\n  \"es_summary\": \"Esta ley ayuda a los agricultores a proteger las rutas de migración de animales silvestres, como ciervos y alces, mediante nuevos incentivos económicos. Introduce herramientas modernas como el cercado virtual para equilibrar la producción agrícola con la conservación.\",\n  \"es_key_points\": [\n    \"Define especies de caza mayor nativas para priorizar su protección en terrenos agrícolas.\",\n    \"Aumenta los límites de pago anual para programas de conservación de 50,000 USD a 125,000 USD.\",\n    \"Promueve el uso de cercas virtuales para permitir el libre movimiento de la fauna silvestre.\",\n    \"Ofrece ayuda económica y técnica para restaurar corredores migratorios y conectar hábitats.\",\n    \"Financia investigaciones sobre el efecto de las tecnologías de cercado en los recursos naturales.\"\n  ],\n  \"it_ai_title\": \"Legge del 2026 sulla connettività degli habitat nelle terre agricole\",\n  \"it_summary\": \"Questa legge aiuta gli agricoltori a proteggere i percorsi migratori della fauna selvatica, come cervi e alci, attraverso nuovi incentivi finanziari. Introduce strumenti moderni come le recinzioni virtuali per bilanciare agricoltura e tutela della natura.\",\n  \"it_key_points\": [\n    \"Definizione di specie di selvaggina grossa nativa per focalizzare gli sforzi di conservazione.\",\n    \"Innalzamento dei limiti di pagamento per i programmi di tutela del suolo da 50.000 a 125.000 dollari.\",\n    \"Promozione di recinzioni virtuali per gestire il bestiame senza ostacolare il passaggio degli animali selvatici.\",\n    \"Supporto finanziario per il ripristino dei corridoi migratori e della connettività ecologica.\",\n    \"Assistenza tecnica per i proprietari terrieri che adottano metodi non strutturali di gestione del territorio.\"\n  ],\n  \"nl_ai_title\": \"Wet op de verbinding van leefgebieden op landbouwgronden van 2026\",\n  \"nl_summary\": \"Deze wet helpt boeren om migratieroutes van wilde dieren, zoals herten en elanden, te beschermen met nieuwe financiële prikkels. Het introduceert moderne middelen zoals virtuele afrastering om landbouw en natuurbehoud te combineren.\",\n  \"nl_key_points\": [\n    \"Vaststelling van inheemse grofwildsoorten om hun bescherming op landbouwgronden te prioriteren.\",\n    \"Verhoging van de jaarlijkse betalingslimieten voor natuurbehoudsprogramma's naar 125.000 USD.\",\n    \"Bevordering van virtuele hekken als methode om vee te beheren zonder de natuurlijke trek te verstoren.\",\n    \"Financiële steun voor het herstel van migratiecorridors en de verbinding tussen leefgebieden.\",\n    \"Subsidies voor onderzoek naar de effecten van virtuele afrastering op natuurlijke hulpbronnen.\"\n  ],\n  \"pt_ai_title\": \"Lei de Conetividade de Habitats em Terras de Trabalho de 2026\",\n  \"pt_summary\": \"Esta lei ajuda os agricultores a proteger as rotas de migração da vida selvagem, como veados e alces, através de novos incentivos financeiros. Introduz ferramentas modernas, como vedações virtuais, para equilibrar a produção agrícola com a conservação.\",\n  \"pt_key_points\": [\n    \"Define espécies de caça de grande porte nativas para priorizar a sua conservação em terras agrícolas.\",\n    \"Aumenta os limites de pagamento anual para programas de conservação de 50.000 USD para 125.000 USD.\",\n    \"Promove o uso de vedações virtuais para gerir o gado sem bloquear a passagem da vida selvagem.\",\n    \"Oferece apoio financeiro para restaurar corredores de migração e a conetividade entre habitats.\",\n    \"Garante assistência técnica para a implementação de novas tecnologias de gestão ambiental.\"\n  ],\n  \"category\": [\"Agriculture\", \"Environment\"]\n}"
    }
  ]
}