{
  "legislationId": "119_S_4150",
  "lastUpdate": "2026-03-27T12:28:14.716Z",
  "history": [
    {
      "timestamp": "2026-03-27T12:28:14.716Z",
      "source_url": "https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/s4150/BILLS-119s4150is.htm",
      "model": "gemini-flash-lite-latest",
      "prompt_sent": "\nROLE: Fact Checker.\nZADANIE: Porównaj SOURCE (oryginał) i SUMMARY (streszczenie przygotowane przez inne AI).\n\nTwoim celem jest wykrycie \"ZMYŚLONYCH KONKRETÓW\" (Fabricated Entities) w SUMMARY.\n\nSOURCE:\n[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [S. 4150 Introduced in Senate (IS)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session S. 4150 A bill to amend the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to establish a uniform 60-day congressional review period for District of Columbia laws, to clarify the expedited procedures applicable to consideration of resolutions of disapproval of District of Columbia laws, to authorize the use of resolutions of disapproval to disapprove provisions of District of Columbia laws and District of Columbia executive orders and regulations, and for other purposes. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES March 19, 2026 Mr. Scott of Florida (for himself and Mrs. Blackburn) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL A bill to amend the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to establish a uniform 60-day congressional review period for District of Columbia laws, to clarify the expedited procedures applicable to consideration of resolutions of disapproval of District of Columbia laws, to authorize the use of resolutions of disapproval to disapprove provisions of District of Columbia laws and District of Columbia executive orders and regulations, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``District of Columbia Home Rule Improvement Act of 2026''. SEC. 2. UNIFORM 60-DAY CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW PERIOD FOR DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LAWS. (a) Establishment of 60-Day Period; Clarification of Beginning of Period and Days Excluded.--Section 602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act (sec. 1-206.02(c)(1), D.C. Official Code) is amended-- (1) by striking ``the 30-calendar-day period (excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays, and any day on which neither House is in session because of an adjournment sine die, a recess of more than three days, or an adjournment of more than three days) beginning on the day such act is transmitted by the Chairman to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President of the Senate'' and inserting the following: ``the 60-day period (excluding days either House of Congress is adjourned for more than 3 days during a session of Congress) beginning on the later of the day such act is transmitted by the Chairman to the Speaker of the House of Representatives or the day such act is transmitted by the Chairman to the President of the Senate''; and (2) by striking ``such 30-day period'' each place it appears and inserting ``such 60-day period''. (b) Elimination of Alternative Period for Acts Affecting Criminal Laws.--Section 602(c) of such Act (sec. 1-206.02(c), D.C. Official Code) is amended-- (1) by striking paragraph (2); and (2) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (2). (c) Special Rule for Acts Designated by Council as Involving Emergency Circumstances.-- (1) No renewal of waiver of review for succeeding acts.-- Section 602(c) of such Act (sec. 1-206.02(c), D.C. Official Code), as amended by subsection (b), is amended by adding at the end the following: ``(3) If an Act is exempt from the requirements of paragraph (1) because of a determination by the Council under section 412(a) that the Act should take effect immediately because of emergency circumstances, an Act of the Council to extend the period during which such Act is effective, or any Act of the Council that is substantially the same as such Act, shall not be exempt from the requirements of paragraph (1).''. (2) Conforming amendment.--Section 412(a) of such Act (sec. 1-204.12(a), D.C. Official Code) is amended by striking ``ninety days'' and inserting ``ninety days, subject to section 602(c)(3)''. SEC. 3. CLARIFICATION OF EXPEDITED PROCEDURES APPLICABLE TO CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS OF DISAPPROVAL. (a) Application of All Procedures to All Resolutions of Disapproval.--The fourth sentence of section 602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act (sec. 1-206.02(c)(1), D.C. Official Code) is amended by striking ``section 604, except subsections (d), (e), and (f) of such section,'' and inserting ``section 604''. (b) Clarification of Procedures.--Section 604 of such Act (sec. 1- 206.04, D.C. Official Code) is amended by striking subsections (c) through (j) and inserting the following: ``(c) Referral to Committees.--A resolution with respect to Council action shall be referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of the House of Representatives, or the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate, by the President of the Senate or the Speaker of the House of Representatives, as the case may be. ``(d) Procedures in House of Representatives.--(1) In the House of Representatives, if the committee to which a resolution has been referred has not reported it at the end of twenty calendar days after its introduction, it is in order to move to discharge the committee from further consideration of any other resolution with respect to the same Council action which has been referred to the committee. ``(2) In the House, a motion to discharge may be made only by an individual favoring the resolution, is highly privileged (except that it may not be made after the committee has reported a resolution with respect to the same action), and debate thereon shall be limited to not more than one hour, to be divided equally between those favoring and those opposing the resolution. An amendment to the motion is not in order, and it is not in order to move to reconsider the vote by which the motion is agreed to or disagreed to. ``(3) In the House, if the motion to discharge is agreed to or disagreed to, the motion may not be renewed, nor may another motion to discharge the committee be made with respect to any other resolution with respect to the same action. ``(4) In the House, when the committee has reported, or has been discharged from further consideration of, a resolution, it is at any time thereafter in order (even though a previous motion to the same effect has been disagreed to) to move to proceed to the consideration of the resolution. The motion is highly privileged and is not debatable. An amendment to the motion is not in order, and it is not in order to move to reconsider the vote by which the motion is agreed to or disagreed to. ``(5) In the House, debate on the resolution shall be limited to not more than one hour, which shall be divided equally between those favoring and those opposing the resolution. A motion further to limit debate is not debatable. An amendment to, or motion to recommit, the resolution is not in order, and it is not in order to move to reconsider the vote by which the resolution is agreed to or disagreed to. ``(6) In the House, motions to postpone made with respect to the discharge from committee or the consideration of a resolution, and motions to proceed to the consideration of other business, shall be decided without debate. ``(7) In the House, appeals from the decisions of the Chair relating to the application of the Rules of the House of Representatives to the procedure relating to a resolution shall be decided without debate. ``(e) Procedures in Senate.--(1) In the Senate, if the committee to which is referred a resolution described in subsection (b) has not reported such joint resolution (or an identical joint resolution) at the end of 20 calendar days after its introduction, such committee may be discharged from further consideration of such joint resolution upon a written demand by any Member of the Senate, and such joint resolution shall be placed on the calendar. ``(2)(A) In the Senate, when the committee to which a resolution is referred has reported, or when a committee is discharged (under paragraph (1)) from further consideration of a resolution described in subsection (b), it is at any time thereafter in order (even though a previous motion to the same effect has been disagreed to) for a motion to proceed to the consideration of the resolution, and all points of order against the resolution (and against consideration of the resolution) are waived. The motion is not subject to amendment, or to a motion to postpone, or to a motion to proceed to the consideration of other business. A motion to reconsider the vote by which the motion is agreed to or disagreed to shall not be in order. If a motion to proceed to the consideration of the resolution is agreed to, the resolution shall remain the unfinished business of the Senate until disposed of. ``(B) In the Senate, debate on the resolution, and on all debatable motions and appeals in connection therewith, shall be limited to not more than 10 hours, which shall be divided equally between those favoring and those opposing the resolution. A motion further to limit debate is in order and not debatable. An amendment to, or a motion to postpone, or a motion to proceed to the consideration of other business, or a motion to recommit the resolution is not in order. ``(C) In the Senate, immediately following the conclusion of the debate on a resolution described in subsection (b), and a single quorum call at the conclusion of the debate if requested in accordance with the rules of the Senate, the vote on final passage of the resolution shall occur. ``(D) Appeals from the decisions of the Chair relating to the application of the rules of the Senate to the procedure relating to a resolution described in subsection (a) shall be decided without debate. ``(3) In the Senate the procedure specified in paragraph (1) or (2) shall not apply to the consideration of a resolution after the expiration of the 60 session days beginning with the date of the introduction of the joint resolution. ``(f) Coordination Between Houses.--If, before the passage by one House of a resolution of that House described in subsection (b), that House receives from the other House a resolution described in subsection (b), then the following procedures shall apply: ``(1) The resolution of the other House shall not be referred to a committee. ``(2) Any Member of that House may at any time offer a motion to proceed to the consideration of the resolution of the other House, and such motion shall be considered in accordance with paragraph (4) of subsection (d) (in the case of a motion in the House) or in accordance with paragraph (2) of subsection (e) (in the case of a motion in the Senate). ``(3) With respect to a resolution described in subsection (a) of the House receiving the resolution-- ``(A) the procedure in that House shall be the same as if no resolution had been received from the other House; but ``(B) the vote on final passage shall be on the resolution of the other House.''. SEC. 4. AUTHORIZING USE OF RESOLUTIONS OF DISAPPROVAL TO DISAPPROVE PROVISIONS OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LAWS. (a) Authorization.--Section 602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act (sec. 1-206.02(c)(1), D.C. Official Code) is amended-- (1) in the second sentence-- (A) by striking ``such act shall take effect'' and inserting ``such act and each provision thereof shall take effect''; and (B) by striking ``a joint resolution disapproving such act.'' and inserting ``a joint resolution disapproving such act or any provision thereof.''; (2) in the third sentence-- (A) by striking ``disapproving such an act'' and inserting ``disapproving such an act or any provision thereof''; and (B) by striking ``to have repealed such act'' and inserting ``to have repealed such act or such provision (as the case may be)''; and (3) in the fourth sentence, by striking ``disapproving any act'' and inserting ``disapproving any act or any provision thereof''. (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 604(b) of such Act (sec. 1- 206.04(b), D.C. Official Code) is amended by striking ``; but does not include a resolution which specifies more than one action''. (c) Rule of Construction.--Section 602(c)(1) of such Act (sec. 1- 206.02(c)(1), D.C. Official Code) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``The enactment of a resolution disapproving a provision of an act pursuant to this paragraph may not be construed to repeal any of the remaining provisions of such act or prohibit the enactment of any subsequent resolution disapproving any other provision of such act pursuant to this paragraph.''. SEC. 5. AUTHORIZING USE OF RESOLUTIONS OF DISAPPROVAL TO DISAPPROVE EXECUTIVE ORDERS AND REGULATIONS. (a) Authorization.--Title VI of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act (sec. 1-206.01 et seq., D.C. Official Code) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``limitations on regulatory authority of mayor ``Sec. 605. (a) Transmission of Executive Orders and Regulations.--The Mayor shall transmit to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President of the Senate a copy of each executive order issued by the Mayor and each regulation promulgated by an officer of the executive branch of the District government. ``(b) Delay in Implementation.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), an executive order or regulation transmitted under subsection (a) shall take effect upon the expiration of the 60-day period (excluding days either House of Congress is adjourned for more than 3 days during a session of Congress) beginning on the later of the day such executive order or regulation is transmitted by the Mayor to the Speaker of the House of Representatives or the day such executive order or regulation is transmitted by the Mayor to the President of the Senate, or upon the date prescribed by such executive order or regulation, whichever is later, unless during such 60-day period, there has been enacted into law a joint resolution disapproving such executive order or regulation. ``(c) Deemed Repeal.--In any case in which any joint resolution described in subsection (b) disapproving an executive order or regulation has, within the 60-day period described in subsection (b), passed both Houses of Congress and has been transmitted to the President, such joint resolution, upon becoming law, subsequent to the expiration of such 60-day period, shall be deemed to have repealed such executive order or regulation, as of the date such joint resolution becomes law. ``(d) Application of Expedited Procedures for Consideration of Resolutions.--The provisions of section 604 shall apply with respect to any joint resolution disapproving any executive order or regulation pursuant to this section.''. (b) Description of Expedited Procedures for Consideration of Resolutions.-- (1) In general.--Section 604 of such Act (sec. 1-206.04, D.C. Official Code), as amended by section 3(b), is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: ``(g) Consideration of Resolutions Disapproving Executive Orders and Regulations.--The provisions of this section shall apply with respect to the issuance of an executive order by the Mayor and the promulgation of a regulation by an officer of the executive branch of the District government in the same manner as such provisions apply with respect to a Council action, except that for purposes of subsection (b) a `resolution' means only a joint resolution, the matter after the resolving clause of which is as follows: `That the _________ approves/disapproves of the action of the Mayor or an officer of the executive branch of the District government described as follows: __________', with the blank spaces therein being appropriately filled, and either approval or disapproval being appropriately indicated, but does not include a resolution which specifies more than one action.''. (2) Conforming amendment.--Section 604(b) of such Act (sec. 1-206.04(b), D.C. Official Code) is amended by striking ``(b) For the purpose of this section,'' and inserting ``(b) For the purpose of this section with respect to a Council action,''. (c) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents of such Act is amended by adding at the end of the items relating to title VI the following: ``Sec. 605. Limitations on regulatory authority of Mayor.''. SEC. 6. PROHIBITING COUNCIL FROM WITHDRAWING ACTS ALREADY TRANSMITTED. Section 602(c) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act (sec. 1- 206.02(c), D.C. Official Code), as amended by section 2(c), is amended by adding at the end the following: ``(4) After the Council has transmitted an Act under this subsection, the Council may not withdraw the Act from the Speaker of the House or the President of the Senate during the period described with respect to the Act under paragraph (1), and the Act shall be subject to this subsection without regard to any attempt by the Council to withdraw the Act.''. SEC. 7. PROHIBITING TRANSMISSION OF ACTS SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME AS DISAPPROVED ACTS. (a) Prohibition.--Section 602 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act (sec. 1-206.02, D.C. Official Code) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``(d) Prohibiting Transmission of Acts Substantially the Same as Disapproved Acts.--If a joint resolution has been enacted into law to disapprove an Act transmitted by the Council under this section, the Council may not transmit another Act under this section that is substantially the same as the Act disapproved by the joint resolution, unless the Council is specifically authorized to transmit such an Act by a law enacted after the date of enactment of the joint resolution to disapprove the original Act.''. (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply with respect to acts of the District of Columbia that are disapproved by a joint resolution enacted on or after the date of enactment of this Act. SEC. 8. ANNUAL HEARING AND REPORT ON STATE OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Not less frequently than once every calendar year, the Chair of the Council of the District of Columbia and the Mayor of the District of Columbia shall appear at a hearing of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate and at a hearing of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of the House of Representatives to present a report on the state of the District, including recommendations for such measures as they deem necessary and expedient. SEC. 9. EFFECTIVE DATE. Except as provided in section 7(b), this Act, and the amendments made by this Act, shall apply with respect to acts of the District of Columbia that are transmitted to Congress by the Council of the District of Columbia under section 602(c) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act (sec. 1-206.02(c), D.C. Official Code), and with respect to executive orders and regulations which are transmitted to Congress by the Mayor under section 605 of such Act, as added by section 5, on or after the date of enactment of this Act. <all>\n\nSUMMARY TO EVALUATE:\nTitle: District of Columbia Home Rule Improvement Act: Increased Congressional Oversight\nSummary: This bill extends the time Congress has to review and potentially block local D.C. laws and grants federal lawmakers the power to veto specific parts of those laws. It also subjects the D.C. Mayor's executive orders and regulations to the same federal approval process.\nKey Points: Extends the mandatory congressional review period for all local D.C. laws to a uniform 60 days., Allows Congress to block specific provisions of a law rather than having to reject the entire act., Subjects the D.C. Mayor's executive orders and regulations to congressional review and potential veto., Prohibits the D.C. Council from passing laws substantially similar to those already rejected by Congress., Requires the D.C. Mayor and Council Chair to testify annually before Congress on the state of the District.\n\nZASADY OCENY:\n1. Sprawdź wszystkie LICZBY, DATY i KWOTY w SUMMARY. Jeśli którejś brakuje w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n2. Sprawdź wszystkie NAZWISKA, ORGANIZACJE i MIEJSCA w SUMMARY. Jeśli którejś brakuje w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n3. Sprawdź wszystkie konkretne DZIAŁANIA PRAWNE . Jeśli tego mechanizmu nie ma w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n\nWAŻNE: Abstrakcyjne pojęcia (np. \"transparentność\", \"zaufanie\") są dozwolone jako wnioski.\n\nOUTPUT (JSON):\n{\n  \"is_valid\": true/false,\n  \"issue\": \"fabricated_entity\" / \"contradiction\" / \"none\"\n}\n\nWYMAGANIA FORMATOWANIA:\n1. Odpowiedz WYŁĄCZNIE surowym obiektem JSON.\n2. NIE używaj bloków kodu Markdown.\n3. NIE dodawaj żadnych wstępów ani wyjaśnień przed ani po JSONie.\n4. JSON musi być poprawny i gotowy do parsowania.\n\n",
      "ai_response_raw": "{\n  \"is_valid\": true,\n  \"issue\": \"none\"\n}"
    },
    {
      "timestamp": "2026-03-27T12:20:26.895Z",
      "source_url": "https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/s4150/BILLS-119s4150is.htm",
      "model": "gemini-flash-latest",
      "prompt_sent": "\nJesteś ekspertem od prawa Stanów Zjednoczonych, który ma za zadanie analizować dokumenty ustaw, uchwał oraz innych dokumentów legislacyjnych, a następnie przygotowywać z nich informacje w przystępny sposób dla obywateli. Twoim celem jest przedstawienie informacji tak, aby obywatele mogli sami ocenić wpływ legislacji na ich życie, nawet bez posiadania specjalistycznej wiedzy legislacyjnej. Skup się na faktach i obiektywnych skutkach wprowadzanych zmian, unikając wartościowania i osobistych opinii. Wszelki żargon prawny jest zabroniony. Prezentuj informacje w jasny, zwięzły i angażujący sposób, tak aby były zrozumiałe dla osoby bez wykształcenia prawniczego. Unikaj długich, złożonych zdań. Zamiast pisać \"projekt ma na celu nowelizację kodeksu podatkowego...\", napisz \"Zmiany w podatkach: nowe ulgi i obowiązki dla...\". Kontynuuj swoją pracę, dopóki nie rozwiążesz swojego zadania. Jeśli nie masz pewności co do generowanej treści, przeanalizuj dokument ponownie – nie zgaduj. Rozplanuj dobrze swoje zadanie przed przystąpieniem do niego. W podsumowaniu i kluczowych punktach, jeśli to możliwe i uzasadnione, podkreśl, jakie konkretne korzyści lub skutki (pozytywne lub negatywne) wprowadza ustawa dla życia codziennego obywateli, ich praw i obowiązków, finansów osobistych, bezpieczeństwa i innych ważnych kwestii (np. kategorycznych zakazów i nakazów czy najważniejszych konkretnych alokacji finansowych i terytorialnych).\n\nTwoja odpowiedź MUSI być w formacie JSON - i zawierać następujące klucze.\nZanim zwrócisz odpowiedź, dokładnie zweryfikuj, czy cała struktura JSON jest w 100% poprawna, włącznie ze wszystkimi przecinkami, nawiasami klamrowymi, kwadratowymi oraz cudzysłowami. Błędny JSON jest nieakceptowalny i uniemożliwi przetworzenie Twojej pracy.\n\nPrzeanalizuj dokładnie poniższy tekst dokumentu prawnego. To jest treść, na podstawie której masz wygenerować podsumowanie i kluczowe punkty:\n--- POCZĄTEK DOKUMENTU ---\n[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [S. 4150 Introduced in Senate (IS)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session S. 4150 A bill to amend the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to establish a uniform 60-day congressional review period for District of Columbia laws, to clarify the expedited procedures applicable to consideration of resolutions of disapproval of District of Columbia laws, to authorize the use of resolutions of disapproval to disapprove provisions of District of Columbia laws and District of Columbia executive orders and regulations, and for other purposes. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES March 19, 2026 Mr. Scott of Florida (for himself and Mrs. Blackburn) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL A bill to amend the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to establish a uniform 60-day congressional review period for District of Columbia laws, to clarify the expedited procedures applicable to consideration of resolutions of disapproval of District of Columbia laws, to authorize the use of resolutions of disapproval to disapprove provisions of District of Columbia laws and District of Columbia executive orders and regulations, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``District of Columbia Home Rule Improvement Act of 2026''. SEC. 2. UNIFORM 60-DAY CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW PERIOD FOR DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LAWS. (a) Establishment of 60-Day Period; Clarification of Beginning of Period and Days Excluded.--Section 602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act (sec. 1-206.02(c)(1), D.C. Official Code) is amended-- (1) by striking ``the 30-calendar-day period (excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays, and any day on which neither House is in session because of an adjournment sine die, a recess of more than three days, or an adjournment of more than three days) beginning on the day such act is transmitted by the Chairman to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President of the Senate'' and inserting the following: ``the 60-day period (excluding days either House of Congress is adjourned for more than 3 days during a session of Congress) beginning on the later of the day such act is transmitted by the Chairman to the Speaker of the House of Representatives or the day such act is transmitted by the Chairman to the President of the Senate''; and (2) by striking ``such 30-day period'' each place it appears and inserting ``such 60-day period''. (b) Elimination of Alternative Period for Acts Affecting Criminal Laws.--Section 602(c) of such Act (sec. 1-206.02(c), D.C. Official Code) is amended-- (1) by striking paragraph (2); and (2) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (2). (c) Special Rule for Acts Designated by Council as Involving Emergency Circumstances.-- (1) No renewal of waiver of review for succeeding acts.-- Section 602(c) of such Act (sec. 1-206.02(c), D.C. Official Code), as amended by subsection (b), is amended by adding at the end the following: ``(3) If an Act is exempt from the requirements of paragraph (1) because of a determination by the Council under section 412(a) that the Act should take effect immediately because of emergency circumstances, an Act of the Council to extend the period during which such Act is effective, or any Act of the Council that is substantially the same as such Act, shall not be exempt from the requirements of paragraph (1).''. (2) Conforming amendment.--Section 412(a) of such Act (sec. 1-204.12(a), D.C. Official Code) is amended by striking ``ninety days'' and inserting ``ninety days, subject to section 602(c)(3)''. SEC. 3. CLARIFICATION OF EXPEDITED PROCEDURES APPLICABLE TO CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS OF DISAPPROVAL. (a) Application of All Procedures to All Resolutions of Disapproval.--The fourth sentence of section 602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act (sec. 1-206.02(c)(1), D.C. Official Code) is amended by striking ``section 604, except subsections (d), (e), and (f) of such section,'' and inserting ``section 604''. (b) Clarification of Procedures.--Section 604 of such Act (sec. 1- 206.04, D.C. Official Code) is amended by striking subsections (c) through (j) and inserting the following: ``(c) Referral to Committees.--A resolution with respect to Council action shall be referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of the House of Representatives, or the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate, by the President of the Senate or the Speaker of the House of Representatives, as the case may be. ``(d) Procedures in House of Representatives.--(1) In the House of Representatives, if the committee to which a resolution has been referred has not reported it at the end of twenty calendar days after its introduction, it is in order to move to discharge the committee from further consideration of any other resolution with respect to the same Council action which has been referred to the committee. ``(2) In the House, a motion to discharge may be made only by an individual favoring the resolution, is highly privileged (except that it may not be made after the committee has reported a resolution with respect to the same action), and debate thereon shall be limited to not more than one hour, to be divided equally between those favoring and those opposing the resolution. An amendment to the motion is not in order, and it is not in order to move to reconsider the vote by which the motion is agreed to or disagreed to. ``(3) In the House, if the motion to discharge is agreed to or disagreed to, the motion may not be renewed, nor may another motion to discharge the committee be made with respect to any other resolution with respect to the same action. ``(4) In the House, when the committee has reported, or has been discharged from further consideration of, a resolution, it is at any time thereafter in order (even though a previous motion to the same effect has been disagreed to) to move to proceed to the consideration of the resolution. The motion is highly privileged and is not debatable. An amendment to the motion is not in order, and it is not in order to move to reconsider the vote by which the motion is agreed to or disagreed to. ``(5) In the House, debate on the resolution shall be limited to not more than one hour, which shall be divided equally between those favoring and those opposing the resolution. A motion further to limit debate is not debatable. An amendment to, or motion to recommit, the resolution is not in order, and it is not in order to move to reconsider the vote by which the resolution is agreed to or disagreed to. ``(6) In the House, motions to postpone made with respect to the discharge from committee or the consideration of a resolution, and motions to proceed to the consideration of other business, shall be decided without debate. ``(7) In the House, appeals from the decisions of the Chair relating to the application of the Rules of the House of Representatives to the procedure relating to a resolution shall be decided without debate. ``(e) Procedures in Senate.--(1) In the Senate, if the committee to which is referred a resolution described in subsection (b) has not reported such joint resolution (or an identical joint resolution) at the end of 20 calendar days after its introduction, such committee may be discharged from further consideration of such joint resolution upon a written demand by any Member of the Senate, and such joint resolution shall be placed on the calendar. ``(2)(A) In the Senate, when the committee to which a resolution is referred has reported, or when a committee is discharged (under paragraph (1)) from further consideration of a resolution described in subsection (b), it is at any time thereafter in order (even though a previous motion to the same effect has been disagreed to) for a motion to proceed to the consideration of the resolution, and all points of order against the resolution (and against consideration of the resolution) are waived. The motion is not subject to amendment, or to a motion to postpone, or to a motion to proceed to the consideration of other business. A motion to reconsider the vote by which the motion is agreed to or disagreed to shall not be in order. If a motion to proceed to the consideration of the resolution is agreed to, the resolution shall remain the unfinished business of the Senate until disposed of. ``(B) In the Senate, debate on the resolution, and on all debatable motions and appeals in connection therewith, shall be limited to not more than 10 hours, which shall be divided equally between those favoring and those opposing the resolution. A motion further to limit debate is in order and not debatable. An amendment to, or a motion to postpone, or a motion to proceed to the consideration of other business, or a motion to recommit the resolution is not in order. ``(C) In the Senate, immediately following the conclusion of the debate on a resolution described in subsection (b), and a single quorum call at the conclusion of the debate if requested in accordance with the rules of the Senate, the vote on final passage of the resolution shall occur. ``(D) Appeals from the decisions of the Chair relating to the application of the rules of the Senate to the procedure relating to a resolution described in subsection (a) shall be decided without debate. ``(3) In the Senate the procedure specified in paragraph (1) or (2) shall not apply to the consideration of a resolution after the expiration of the 60 session days beginning with the date of the introduction of the joint resolution. ``(f) Coordination Between Houses.--If, before the passage by one House of a resolution of that House described in subsection (b), that House receives from the other House a resolution described in subsection (b), then the following procedures shall apply: ``(1) The resolution of the other House shall not be referred to a committee. ``(2) Any Member of that House may at any time offer a motion to proceed to the consideration of the resolution of the other House, and such motion shall be considered in accordance with paragraph (4) of subsection (d) (in the case of a motion in the House) or in accordance with paragraph (2) of subsection (e) (in the case of a motion in the Senate). ``(3) With respect to a resolution described in subsection (a) of the House receiving the resolution-- ``(A) the procedure in that House shall be the same as if no resolution had been received from the other House; but ``(B) the vote on final passage shall be on the resolution of the other House.''. SEC. 4. AUTHORIZING USE OF RESOLUTIONS OF DISAPPROVAL TO DISAPPROVE PROVISIONS OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LAWS. (a) Authorization.--Section 602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act (sec. 1-206.02(c)(1), D.C. Official Code) is amended-- (1) in the second sentence-- (A) by striking ``such act shall take effect'' and inserting ``such act and each provision thereof shall take effect''; and (B) by striking ``a joint resolution disapproving such act.'' and inserting ``a joint resolution disapproving such act or any provision thereof.''; (2) in the third sentence-- (A) by striking ``disapproving such an act'' and inserting ``disapproving such an act or any provision thereof''; and (B) by striking ``to have repealed such act'' and inserting ``to have repealed such act or such provision (as the case may be)''; and (3) in the fourth sentence, by striking ``disapproving any act'' and inserting ``disapproving any act or any provision thereof''. (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 604(b) of such Act (sec. 1- 206.04(b), D.C. Official Code) is amended by striking ``; but does not include a resolution which specifies more than one action''. (c) Rule of Construction.--Section 602(c)(1) of such Act (sec. 1- 206.02(c)(1), D.C. Official Code) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``The enactment of a resolution disapproving a provision of an act pursuant to this paragraph may not be construed to repeal any of the remaining provisions of such act or prohibit the enactment of any subsequent resolution disapproving any other provision of such act pursuant to this paragraph.''. SEC. 5. AUTHORIZING USE OF RESOLUTIONS OF DISAPPROVAL TO DISAPPROVE EXECUTIVE ORDERS AND REGULATIONS. (a) Authorization.--Title VI of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act (sec. 1-206.01 et seq., D.C. Official Code) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``limitations on regulatory authority of mayor ``Sec. 605. (a) Transmission of Executive Orders and Regulations.--The Mayor shall transmit to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President of the Senate a copy of each executive order issued by the Mayor and each regulation promulgated by an officer of the executive branch of the District government. ``(b) Delay in Implementation.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), an executive order or regulation transmitted under subsection (a) shall take effect upon the expiration of the 60-day period (excluding days either House of Congress is adjourned for more than 3 days during a session of Congress) beginning on the later of the day such executive order or regulation is transmitted by the Mayor to the Speaker of the House of Representatives or the day such executive order or regulation is transmitted by the Mayor to the President of the Senate, or upon the date prescribed by such executive order or regulation, whichever is later, unless during such 60-day period, there has been enacted into law a joint resolution disapproving such executive order or regulation. ``(c) Deemed Repeal.--In any case in which any joint resolution described in subsection (b) disapproving an executive order or regulation has, within the 60-day period described in subsection (b), passed both Houses of Congress and has been transmitted to the President, such joint resolution, upon becoming law, subsequent to the expiration of such 60-day period, shall be deemed to have repealed such executive order or regulation, as of the date such joint resolution becomes law. ``(d) Application of Expedited Procedures for Consideration of Resolutions.--The provisions of section 604 shall apply with respect to any joint resolution disapproving any executive order or regulation pursuant to this section.''. (b) Description of Expedited Procedures for Consideration of Resolutions.-- (1) In general.--Section 604 of such Act (sec. 1-206.04, D.C. Official Code), as amended by section 3(b), is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: ``(g) Consideration of Resolutions Disapproving Executive Orders and Regulations.--The provisions of this section shall apply with respect to the issuance of an executive order by the Mayor and the promulgation of a regulation by an officer of the executive branch of the District government in the same manner as such provisions apply with respect to a Council action, except that for purposes of subsection (b) a `resolution' means only a joint resolution, the matter after the resolving clause of which is as follows: `That the _________ approves/disapproves of the action of the Mayor or an officer of the executive branch of the District government described as follows: __________', with the blank spaces therein being appropriately filled, and either approval or disapproval being appropriately indicated, but does not include a resolution which specifies more than one action.''. (2) Conforming amendment.--Section 604(b) of such Act (sec. 1-206.04(b), D.C. Official Code) is amended by striking ``(b) For the purpose of this section,'' and inserting ``(b) For the purpose of this section with respect to a Council action,''. (c) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents of such Act is amended by adding at the end of the items relating to title VI the following: ``Sec. 605. Limitations on regulatory authority of Mayor.''. SEC. 6. PROHIBITING COUNCIL FROM WITHDRAWING ACTS ALREADY TRANSMITTED. Section 602(c) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act (sec. 1- 206.02(c), D.C. Official Code), as amended by section 2(c), is amended by adding at the end the following: ``(4) After the Council has transmitted an Act under this subsection, the Council may not withdraw the Act from the Speaker of the House or the President of the Senate during the period described with respect to the Act under paragraph (1), and the Act shall be subject to this subsection without regard to any attempt by the Council to withdraw the Act.''. SEC. 7. PROHIBITING TRANSMISSION OF ACTS SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME AS DISAPPROVED ACTS. (a) Prohibition.--Section 602 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act (sec. 1-206.02, D.C. Official Code) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``(d) Prohibiting Transmission of Acts Substantially the Same as Disapproved Acts.--If a joint resolution has been enacted into law to disapprove an Act transmitted by the Council under this section, the Council may not transmit another Act under this section that is substantially the same as the Act disapproved by the joint resolution, unless the Council is specifically authorized to transmit such an Act by a law enacted after the date of enactment of the joint resolution to disapprove the original Act.''. (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply with respect to acts of the District of Columbia that are disapproved by a joint resolution enacted on or after the date of enactment of this Act. SEC. 8. ANNUAL HEARING AND REPORT ON STATE OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Not less frequently than once every calendar year, the Chair of the Council of the District of Columbia and the Mayor of the District of Columbia shall appear at a hearing of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate and at a hearing of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of the House of Representatives to present a report on the state of the District, including recommendations for such measures as they deem necessary and expedient. SEC. 9. EFFECTIVE DATE. Except as provided in section 7(b), this Act, and the amendments made by this Act, shall apply with respect to acts of the District of Columbia that are transmitted to Congress by the Council of the District of Columbia under section 602(c) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act (sec. 1-206.02(c), D.C. Official Code), and with respect to executive orders and regulations which are transmitted to Congress by the Mayor under section 605 of such Act, as added by section 5, on or after the date of enactment of this Act. <all>\n--- KONIEC DOKUMENTU ---\n\nPAMIĘTAJ: Twoja odpowiedź MUSI być wyłącznie poprawnym obiektem JSON. Nie dodawaj żadnych dodatkowych znaków, komentarzy ani tekstu przed znacznikiem '{' ani po znaczniku '}'. Cała odpowiedź musi być parsowalna jako JSON.\nNa podstawie POWYŻSZEGO dokumentu, wypełnij poniższą strukturę JSON:\nOto struktura JSON, której oczekuję (wypełnij ją treścią):\n{\n  \"pl_ai_title\": \"Nowy, krótki tytuł dla aktu prawnego po polsku, oddający sedno wprowadzanych zmian (np. maksymalnie 10-12 słów).\",\n  \"pl_summary\": \"2-3 zdania zwięzłego podsumowania treści aktu prawnego po polsku, napisane z perspektywy wpływu na życie codzienne obywateli.\",\n  \"pl_key_points\": [\n    \"Pierwszy krótki punkt po polsku dotyczący najważniejszych wprowadzanych rozwiązań lub zmian.\",\n    \"Drugi krótki punkt po polsku...\"\n  ],\n  \"eng_ai_title\": \"A new, short title for the legal act in English, capturing the essence of the changes (e.g., max 10-12 words).\",\n  \"eng_summary\": \"2-3 sentences summarizing the legal act in English, from the perspective of its impact on citizens' daily lives.\",\n  \"eng_key_points\": [\n    \"First short bullet point in English regarding the most important solutions or changes being introduced.\",\n    \"Second short bullet point in English...\"\n  ],\n  \"de_ai_title\": \"Ein neuer, kurzer Titel für das Rechtsdokument auf Deutsch, der den Kern der Änderungen erfasst (z.B. max. 10-12 Wörter).\",\n  \"de_summary\": \"2-3 Sätze Zusammenfassung des Rechtsdokuments auf Deutsch, aus der Perspektive seiner Auswirkungen auf das tägliche Leben der Bürger.\",\n  \"de_key_points\": [\n    \"Erster kurzer Stichpunkt auf Deutsch zu den wichtigsten eingeführten Lösungen oder Änderungen.\",\n    \"Zweiter kurzer Stichpunkt auf Deutsch...\"\n  ],\n  \"fr_ai_title\": \"Un nouveau titre court pour l'acte juridique en français, saisissant l'essence des changements (par exemple, 10-12 mots maximum).\",\n  \"fr_summary\": \"Résumé de 2-3 phrases de l'acte juridique en français, du point de vue de son impact sur la vie quotidienne des citoyens.\",\n  \"fr_key_points\": [\n    \"Premier court point en français concernant les solutions ou changements les plus importants introduits.\",\n    \"Deuxième court point en français...\"\n  ],\n  \"es_ai_title\": \"Un nuevo título breve para el acto jurídico en español, que recoja la esencia de los cambios (por ejemplo, máximo 10-12 palabras).\",\n  \"es_summary\": \"Resumen de 2-3 frases del acto jurídico en español, desde la perspectiva de su impacto en la vida cotidiana de los ciudadanos.\",\n  \"es_key_points\": [\n    \"Primer punto breve en español sobre las soluciones o cambios más importantes que se introducen.\",\n    \"Segundo punto breve en español...\"\n  ],\n  \"it_ai_title\": \"Un nuovo titolo breve per l'atto giuridico in italiano, che colga l'essenza delle modifiche (ad es. massimo 10-12 parole).\",\n  \"it_summary\": \"Riepilogo di 2-3 frasi dell'atto giuridico in italiano, dal punto di vista del suo impatto sulla vita quotidiana dei cittadini.\",\n  \"it_key_points\": [\n    \"Primo breve punto in italiano riguardante le soluzioni o le modifiche più importanti introdotte.\",\n    \"Secondo breve punto in italiano...\"\n  ],\n  \"nl_ai_title\": \"Een nieuwe, korte titel voor de rechtshandeling in het Nederlands, die de essentie van de wijzigingen weergeeft (bijv. max. 10-12 woorden).\",\n  \"nl_summary\": \"Samenvatting van 2-3 zinnen van de rechtshandeling in het Nederlands, vanuit het perspectief van de impact op het dagelijks leven van burgers.\",\n  \"nl_key_points\": [\n    \"Eerste korte punt in het Nederlands betreffende de belangrijkste geïntroduceerde oplossingen of wijzigingen.\",\n    \"Tweede korte punt in het Nederlands...\"\n  ],\n  \"pt_ai_title\": \"Um novo título curto para o ato jurídico em português, capturando a essência das mudanças (por exemplo, máx. 10-12 palavras).\",\n  \"pt_summary\": \"Resumo de 2-3 frases do ato jurídico em português, na perspetiva do seu impacto na vida quotidiana dos cidadãos.\",\n  \"pt_key_points\": [\n    \"Primeiro ponto curto em português sobre as soluções ou alterações mais importantes introduzidas.\",\n    \"Segundo ponto curto em português...\"\n  ],\n  \"category\": [\"Categorize the document into one category by default, based on the field it primarily concerns. Choose up to 3 if the document also touches upon SIGNIFICANT issues from other categories. You MUST select categories ONLY from the following list: Health, Education, Family, Taxes, Labor, Security, Environment, Courts and Law, Transport, Benefits, Real Estate, Media and Culture, Local Government, Migration, Agriculture, Public Investments, Informatization, Economy. If the document does not definitively fit any of these, you MUST use \"Other\". If you use \"Other\", it should be the ONLY category selected. Do NOT invent new categories. The response must be an array of strings, e.g., [\"Taxes\", \"Family\"].\"]\n}\n\n",
      "ai_response_raw": "{\n  \"pl_ai_title\": \"Zmiany w nadzorze nad Waszyngtonem: większa kontrola Kongresu nad lokalnym prawem\",\n  \"pl_summary\": \"Ustawa wydłuża czas, w którym Kongres może zablokować lokalne przepisy w Waszyngtonie, oraz daje mu prawo do uchylania konkretnych części ustaw i decyzji burmistrza. Zmiany te oznaczają ściślejszy nadzór federalny nad codziennym zarządzaniem miastem, jego przepisami i finansami.\",\n  \"pl_key_points\": [\n    \"Wydłużenie do 60 dni czasu, w którym Kongres może zablokować każde nowe prawo lokalne w Waszyngtonie.\",\n    \"Możliwość odrzucania przez Kongres pojedynczych zapisów w ustawach zamiast całych dokumentów.\",\n    \"Obowiązek poddawania rozporządzeń burmistrza kontroli Kongresu przed ich wejściem w życie.\",\n    \"Zakaz ponownego uchwalania przez miasto przepisów niemal identycznych z tymi, które Kongres już odrzucił.\",\n    \"Obowiązek corocznego składania sprawozdań z sytuacji w mieście przez burmistrza przed komisjami Kongresu.\"\n  ],\n  \"eng_ai_title\": \"District of Columbia Home Rule Improvement Act: Increased Congressional Oversight\",\n  \"eng_summary\": \"This bill extends the time Congress has to review and potentially block local D.C. laws and grants federal lawmakers the power to veto specific parts of those laws. It also subjects the D.C. Mayor's executive orders and regulations to the same federal approval process.\",\n  \"eng_key_points\": [\n    \"Extends the mandatory congressional review period for all local D.C. laws to a uniform 60 days.\",\n    \"Allows Congress to block specific provisions of a law rather than having to reject the entire act.\",\n    \"Subjects the D.C. Mayor's executive orders and regulations to congressional review and potential veto.\",\n    \"Prohibits the D.C. Council from passing laws substantially similar to those already rejected by Congress.\",\n    \"Requires the D.C. Mayor and Council Chair to testify annually before Congress on the state of the District.\"\n  ],\n  \"de_ai_title\": \"Stärkung der Kongressaufsicht über die Gesetze und Verordnungen von Washington D.C.\",\n  \"de_summary\": \"Dieses Gesetz verlängert die Frist, in der der US-Kongress lokale Gesetze von Washington D.C. blockieren kann, und ermöglicht es, auch einzelne Bestimmungen abzulehnen. Zudem unterliegen nun auch Anordnungen des Bürgermeisters der direkten Kontrolle durch den Kongress.\",\n  \"de_key_points\": [\n    \"Einheitliche Verlängerung der Prüffrist für alle lokalen Gesetze von Washington D.C. auf 60 Tage.\",\n    \"Ermächtigung des Kongresses, einzelne Bestimmungen eines Gesetzes abzulehnen, ohne das gesamte Gesetz stoppen zu müssen.\",\n    \"Verpflichtung, auch Verordnungen des Bürgermeisters dem Kongress zur Prüfung und zum möglichen Veto vorzulegen.\",\n    \"Verbot für den Stadtrat, Gesetze zu verabschieden, die bereits abgelehnten Regelungen im Wesentlichen entsprechen.\",\n    \"Jährliche Berichtspflicht des Bürgermeisters und des Stadtratsvorsitzenden vor dem US-Kongress.\"\n  ],\n  \"fr_ai_title\": \"Renforcement de la surveillance du Congrès sur les lois et règlements de Washington D.C.\",\n  \"fr_summary\": \"Ce projet de loi prolonge le délai dont dispose le Congrès pour examiner et bloquer les lois locales de Washington D.C., tout en lui permettant de rejeter des dispositions spécifiques. Il soumet également les décrets et règlements du maire à une approbation fédérale obligatoire.\",\n  \"fr_key_points\": [\n    \"Prolongation à 60 jours du délai d'examen par le Congrès pour toutes les lois locales de Washington D.C.\",\n    \"Autorisation pour le Congrès de rejeter des dispositions spécifiques d'une loi au lieu de l'acte entier.\",\n    \"Soumission des décrets et règlements du maire à un examen obligatoire et à un veto potentiel du Congrès.\",\n    \"Interdiction pour la ville de proposer des lois quasi identiques à celles que le Congrès a déjà rejetées.\",\n    \"Obligation pour le maire et le président du conseil municipal de témoigner chaque année devant le Congrès.\"\n  ],\n  \"es_ai_title\": \"Fortalecimiento de la supervisión del Congreso sobre las leyes y regulaciones de Washington D.C.\",\n  \"es_summary\": \"Esta ley amplía el plazo para que el Congreso revise y bloquee las leyes locales de Washington D.C. y le otorga el poder de vetar partes específicas de las mismas. También establece que las órdenes ejecutivas y regulaciones del alcalde deben pasar por una revisión federal.\",\n  \"es_key_points\": [\n    \"Ampliación a 60 días del plazo de revisión del Congreso para todas las leyes locales de Washington D.C.\",\n    \"Permiso al Congreso para vetar disposiciones específicas de una ley sin necesidad de rechazar el documento completo.\",\n    \"Obligación de someter las órdenes ejecutivas y regulaciones del alcalde a la revisión y posible veto del Congreso.\",\n    \"Prohibición de aprobar leyes que sean sustancialmente iguales a las que el Congreso ya haya rechazado previamente.\",\n    \"Requisito de que el alcalde y el presidente del concejo informen anualmente ante el Congreso sobre el estado del Distrito.\"\n  ],\n  \"it_ai_title\": \"Rafforzamento della supervisione del Congresso sulle leggi e i regolamenti di Washington D.C.\",\n  \"it_summary\": \"Questa legge estende il periodo a disposizione del Congresso per esaminare e bloccare le leggi locali di Washington D.C., consentendo di respingere anche singole disposizioni. Inoltre, sottopone le ordinanze e i regolamenti del sindaco al controllo federale preventivo.\",\n  \"it_key_points\": [\n    \"Estensione a 60 giorni del periodo di revisione del Congresso per tutte le leggi locali di Washington D.C.\",\n    \"Possibilità per il Congresso di bocciare singole clausole di una legge invece dell'intero provvedimento.\",\n    \"Sottomissione delle ordinanze e dei regolamenti del sindaco alla revisione e al potenziale veto del Congresso.\",\n    \"Divieto per il consiglio comunale di riproporre norme sostanzialmente identiche a quelle già respinte dal Congresso.\",\n    \"Obbligo per il sindaco e il presidente del consiglio comunale di riferire annualmente al Congresso sullo stato del Distretto.\"\n  ],\n  \"nl_ai_title\": \"Versterking van het toezicht door het Congres op wetten en regels van Washington D.C.\",\n  \"nl_summary\": \"Dit wetsvoorstel verlengt de termijn waarin het Congres lokale wetten van Washington D.C. kan blokkeren en geeft hen de macht om specifieke onderdelen van wetten te verwerpen. Ook besluiten en regels van de burgemeester vallen voortaan onder dit federale toezicht.\",\n  \"nl_key_points\": [\n    \"Verlenging van de beoordelingstermijn door het Congres voor alle lokale wetten van Washington D.C. naar 60 dagen.\",\n    \"Mogelijkheid voor het Congres om specifieke bepalingen van een wet af te keuren in plaats van de gehele wet.\",\n    \"Onderwerping van burgemeestersbesluiten en regels aan verplichte beoordeling en mogelijk veto door het Congres.\",\n    \"Verbod op het aannemen van wetten die nagenoeg hetzelfde zijn als wetten die het Congres eerder heeft verworpen.\",\n    \"Verplichting voor de burgemeester en de voorzitter van de raad om jaarlijks verslag uit te brengen aan het Congres.\"\n  ],\n  \"pt_ai_title\": \"Reforço da supervisão do Congresso sobre as leis e regulamentos de Washington D.C.\",\n  \"pt_summary\": \"Esta proposta de lei prolonga o prazo para o Congresso rever e bloquear leis locais de Washington D.C., permitindo a rejeição de disposições específicas. Além disso, submete as ordens executivas e regulamentos do presidente da câmara ao controlo federal.\",\n  \"pt_key_points\": [\n    \"Extensão para 60 dias do período de revisão do Congresso para todas as leis locais de Washington D.C.\",\n    \"Autorização para o Congresso reprovar disposições específicas de uma lei em vez de rejeitar o ato completo.\",\n    \"Submissão das ordens executivas e regulamentos do presidente da câmara à revisão e possível veto do Congresso.\",\n    \"Proibição de aprovar leis substancialmente iguais a leis que o Congresso já tenha rejeitado anteriormente.\",\n    \"Requisito de comparência anual do presidente da câmara e do conselho perante o Congresso para apresentar relatórios.\"\n  ],\n  \"category\": [\"Local Government\", \"Courts and Law\"]\n}"
    }
  ]
}