{
  "legislationId": "119_S_4281",
  "lastUpdate": "2026-04-21T11:36:47.612Z",
  "history": [
    {
      "timestamp": "2026-04-21T11:36:47.612Z",
      "source_url": "https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/s4281/BILLS-119s4281is.htm",
      "model": "gemini-flash-lite-latest",
      "prompt_sent": "\nROLE: Fact Checker.\nZADANIE: Porównaj SOURCE (oryginał) i SUMMARY (streszczenie przygotowane przez inne AI).\n\nTwoim celem jest wykrycie \"ZMYŚLONYCH KONKRETÓW\" (Fabricated Entities) w SUMMARY.\n\nSOURCE:\n[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [S. 4281 Introduced in Senate (IS)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session S. 4281 To provide for export restrictions on certain semiconductor manufacturing equipment and components therefor, and for other purposes. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES April 13, 2026 Mr. Ricketts (for himself, Mr. Kim, Mr. Risch, and Mr. Schumer) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To provide for export restrictions on certain semiconductor manufacturing equipment and components therefor, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Multilateral Alignment of Technology Controls on Hardware (MATCH) Act''. SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS. It is the sense of Congress that-- (1) export controls on semiconductor manufacturing equipment and components represent one of the United States most effective defenses of this foundational technology; (2) advanced computing applications like artificial intelligence are transforming military affairs and the balance of power; (3) the United States and its allies have an advantage in the foundational technologies that underpin advanced computing applications, including advanced-node integrated circuits and the equipment and software required to design and produce advanced-node integrated circuits; (4) robust controls on semiconductor manufacturing equipment and components have been a bipartisan priority across multiple administrations, reflecting a shared recognition that protecting America's semiconductor advantage is essential to national security; (5) the adversaries of the United States are exploiting gaps in the current export control regime; (6) certain entities, including ChangXin Memory Technologies, Hua Hong Semiconductor Limited, Huawei Technologies Company, Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation, and Yangtze Memory Technologies Corporation are engaged in efforts to produce advanced-node integrated circuits that are especially crucial for the Military-Civil Fusion efforts of the People's Republic of China and warrant comprehensive export controls to prevent those companies from accessing items made with United States technologies; (7) companies located in adversary countries that produce semiconductor manufacturing equipment are critical to adversaries' efforts to overcome exports controls to develop advanced-node integrated circuit production capabilities, and such companies should not be permitted to utilize or benefit from United States or allied technology or components; (8) the United States Government should work closely with allies and partners of the United States to align export controls on semiconductor manufacturing equipment and components to prevent gaps in controls, reduce the risk of circumvention, and ensure a level global playing field; and (9) securing a diplomatic agreement, including through the use of positive incentives to encourage adoption of these controls, is the best and most sustainable path to alignment. SEC. 3. REPORT AND APPLICATION OF CONTROLS. (a) Identifying Chokepoints.--Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the covered agency heads shall-- (1) jointly conduct a review to identify all covered semiconductor manufacturing equipment and all covered facilities; and (2) shall-- (A) submit to the appropriate congressional committees a list of all such equipment and facilities; and (B) notify the public in the Federal Register when this submission has occurred. (b) Diplomatic Engagement.-- (1) In general.--The covered agency heads shall prioritize and, upon the date of the enactment of this Act, immediately engage in diplomatic efforts to encourage the governments of allied supplier countries to adopt-- (A) countrywide controls, or other policies that have the same practical effect as countrywide controls, on covered semiconductor manufacturing equipment that are subject to the jurisdiction of such allied supplier country; and (B) license requirements for the export of all applicable items to any covered facility and the servicing of all applicable items at any covered facility, with a policy of denying such license. (2) Briefing on diplomatic efforts.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the covered agency heads shall provide a briefing to members of the appropriate congressional committees that-- (A) describes the status of diplomatic efforts to secure the adoption by allied supplier countries of the controls described in paragraph (1); (B) outlines and assesses positive incentives to encourage adoption of these controls; and (C) identifies-- (i) countries that have not adopted the controls described in paragraph (1)(A); (ii) countries that have not adopted the controls described in paragraph (1)(B); and (iii) measures that the United States has taken to implement the controls described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (1). (c) Application of Controls and Exhaustion of Diplomatic Recourse.-- (1) Application of controls.--Not later than 150 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall issue regulations that-- (A) apply countrywide controls to covered semiconductor manufacturing equipment produced in the United States; and (B) apply comprehensive end-user or end-use restrictions to all covered facilities located in countries of concern. (2) Exhaustion of diplomatic recourse.--Except as provided in paragraph (4), for each allied supplier country, the covered agency heads shall jointly certify, not later than 150 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, to the appropriate congressional committees that either-- (A) the country has implemented-- (i) countrywide controls, or policies that have the same practical effect, on all semiconductor manufacturing equipment that is subject to the jurisdiction of the allied supplier country; and (ii) licensing requirements, with a policy of denying the license, for the export of all applicable items to any covered facility, or other policies with the same practical effect; or (B)(i) the country has not adopted the controls described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of subsection (b)(1); (ii) the covered agency heads have prioritized and exhausted available diplomatic channels; (iii) such channels have failed to secure export controls from the allied supplier country that have the same practical effect as those described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of subsection (b)(1); and (iv) continued delay would materially undermine the national security of the United States. (3) Extension of controls.--For each allied supplier country for which the covered agency heads submitted a certification described in paragraph (2)(B), the Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall issue regulations that-- (A) establish jurisdiction over and apply countrywide controls, by directly controlling the equipment, indirectly restricting the end-use of essential components of such equipment, or both, to covered semiconductor manufacturing equipment exported from the allied supplier country; (B) require a license for the servicing of any applicable item that is also subject to the jurisdiction of the allied supplier country in any covered facility located in a country of concern and implement a policy of denying the license for such servicing; and (C) establish jurisdiction over applicable items from the allied supplier country and apply end-user or end-use controls prohibiting the export of such items to any covered facility. (4) National security waiver.--The covered agency heads may jointly grant a one-time waiver to extend the 150-day deadline for certification under paragraph (2) by not more than 90 days, if the covered agency heads, with concurrence from the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Energy, jointly-- (A) submit a report to the appropriate congressional committees describing-- (i) justification for why the deadline could not be met; and (ii) the interim steps the covered agency heads have taken to prevent stockpiling; and (B) determine and certify to the appropriate congressional committees that-- (i) the extension is in the national security interest of the United States, despite the risk that countries of concern may take advantage of the delay to further stockpile covered semiconductor manufacturing equipment; and (ii) the government of the allied supplier country is taking concrete, verifiable steps, pursuant to their domestic laws and regulations and as expeditiously as possible, to adopt and implement controls that have the same practical effect as, or are more stringent than, the controls that would otherwise be imposed under paragraph (3). (d) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the covered agency heads shall provide to the appropriate congressional committees a report that includes-- (1) a list of all covered semiconductor manufacturing equipment; (2) a list of all entities that own or operate a covered facility; (3) the scope of the countrywide controls imposed by the United States and allied supplier countries on each covered semiconductor manufacturing equipment identified pursuant to paragraph (1); (4) a summary of diplomatic engagements and unilateral actions undertaken by the covered agency heads in the 12-months period prior to the submission of the report to close any gap among allied supplier countries in the countrywide controls imposed by such countries for covered semiconductor manufacturing equipment; and (5) a certification that the export of any covered semiconductor manufacturing equipment to a country of concern and the export of any applicable items to any covered facility, or servicing of any such item located in a country of concern, requires a license issued by the United States or an allied supplier country, with a policy of denying such license. (e) Termination and Reimposition of Controls Upon Allied Action.-- (1) Termination or modification.--The Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with the Secretary of State, may terminate or modify any control imposed under subsection (c)(3) for items exported from an allied supplier country, if the country has established controls, including licensing policies, that have the same practical effect as those described in subsection (b)(1). (2) Reimposition.--If, after terminating or modifying a control under paragraph (1), the covered agency heads determine that the allied supplier country has materially weakened, suspended, or revoked the control that justified the termination or modification under paragraph (1), the Secretary of Commerce shall, in consultation with the Secretary of State and not later than 60 days after making such determination-- (A) notify the appropriate congressional committees of such determination; and (B) reimpose the control under subsection (c)(3) that was terminated or modified under paragraph (1). (f) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this Act may be construed as diminishing or superseding the authority of the Secretary of Commerce to control the export, reexport, or in-country transfer of items under the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 (50 U.S.C. 4801 et seq.). (g) Definitions.--In this section: (1) Advanced-node integrated circuits.--The term ``advanced-node integrated circuits'' has the meaning given that term in section 772.1 of the Export Administration Regulations. (2) Allied supplier country.--The term ``allied supplier country'' means any country that-- (A) is not a country of concern; and (B) is engaged in the production of covered semiconductor manufacturing equipment. (3) Applicable item.--The term ``applicable item'' means any item that is or can be made subject to the Export Administration Regulations, including-- (A) a United States-origin item; (B) a foreign-produced item that is the direct product of, or produced by plants or major components that are the direct product of, United States-origin software or technology subject to the Export Administration Regulations; (C) a foreign-produced item with more than zero percent de minimis United States-origin content; and (D) a foreign-produced item that contain United States-origin or foreign-produced integrated circuits that are presumptively designed or produced, directly or indirectly, with technology, software, or equipment that is subject to the Export Administration Regulations. (4) Appropriate congressional committees.--The term ``appropriate congressional committees'' means-- (A) the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and (B) the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. (5) Capabilities comparable to those of the product sold by the global market leader.--The term ``capabilities comparable to those of the product sold by the global market leader'' means, considering cost, throughput, reliability, precision, and any other relevant factors, advanced-node integrated circuit makers headquartered outside of countries of concern, when selecting a tool for use in high-volume manufacturing, would be indifferent about using, or would prefer to use, the tool produced by the country of concern, rather than a tool sold by the company with the greatest share of the global market for tools used to accomplish the same function. (6) Country of concern.--The term ``country of concern'' has the meaning given the term ``covered nation'' in section 4872(f) of title 10, United States Code. (7) Countrywide controls.--The term ``countrywide controls'' means licensing requirements, with a policy of denying any such license, for the export, reexport, in-country transfer, or servicing of specified items to any destination within a country of concern, excluding exports where the destination is a fabrication facility that existed as of the date of the enactment of this Act and remains owned and operated by a company headquartered, and the ultimate parent company of which is headquartered, outside of any country of concern. (8) Covered agency heads.--The term ``covered agency heads'' means the Secretary of Commerce, acting through the Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security, and the Secretary of State. (9) Covered facility.--The term ``covered facility'' means-- (A) a facility engaged in the production of advanced-node integrated circuits which is owned or operated by an entity headquartered in, or whose ultimate parent company is headquartered in, a country of concern; or (B) any facility owned or operated by, or in common ownership or control with-- (i) any entity referenced in subparagraphs (A) or (B) of section 5949(j)(3) of the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 (Public Law 117-263; 41 U.S.C. 4713 note); (ii) Hua Hong Semiconductor Limited; (iii) Huawei Technologies Company; (iv) any producer, manufacturer, or developer of semiconductor manufacturing equipment that is headquartered in, or the ultimate parent company of which is headquartered in, a country of concern; or (v) any entity that is a subsidiary, affiliate, or successor to, or has a joint venture, teaming agreement, joint development or research agreement, technology transfer or collaboration agreement, or other similar type of arrangement with an entity described in any of clauses (i) through (iv). (10) Covered semiconductor manufacturing equipment.--The term ``covered semiconductor manufacturing equipment''-- (A) means semiconductor manufacturing equipment or a component therefor that-- (i) is an applicable item; and (ii) the covered agency heads determine no country of concern produces in sufficient volumes and with capabilities comparable to those of the product sold by the global market leader, as of the date of the enactment of this Act; and (B) includes, at a minimum-- (i) all semiconductor manufacturing equipment, materials, and software that, as of the date of the enactment of this Act, require a license for the export, reexport, or in- country transfer to any destination in a country of concern; (ii) all deep ultraviolet immersion photolithography machines, through silicon via deposition and etch tools, cryogenic etch equipment, and cobalt deposition equipment; and (iii) all semiconductor manufacturing equipment or components specified in Export Control Classification Number 3B993 (as in effect on the date of the enactment of this Act) except any item the covered agency heads determine do not meet the requirements of subparagraph (A). (11) Export; in-country transfer; reexport; export administration regulation.--The terms ``export'', ``in-country transfer'', ``reexport'', and ``Export Administration Regulations'' have the meanings given such terms in section 1742 of the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 (50 U.S.C. 4801). (12) In sufficient volumes.--The term ``in sufficient volumes'' means in volumes sufficient to meet 75 percent of current demand from all countries of concern. (13) Servicing.--The term ``servicing'' means any servicing of equipment or components, whether in-person or remote, including installation, calibration, repair, overhauling, refurbishing, testing, diagnosing, updating software or firmware, training, field services, application support engineering, customization, technical assistance, process adjustments, troubleshooting, and transfer of industry best practices for maintenance. <all>\n\nSUMMARY TO EVALUATE:\nTitle: MATCH Act: New Export Restrictions on Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology\nSummary: This act limits the export of advanced chip-making equipment to protect national security and maintain a technological lead. It aims to prevent rival nations from using Western technology to build advanced AI and military systems.\nKey Points: Strict bans on exporting advanced semiconductor manufacturing tools to specific countries of concern., Diplomatic efforts to ensure international allies adopt similar trade restrictions to prevent technology leaks., New licensing requirements for servicing, repairing, and updating high-tech equipment already located abroad., Annual reviews to identify critical technology 'chokepoints' and facilities that must be protected., Power to impose restrictions on equipment from allied countries if they fail to implement comparable export controls.\n\nZASADY OCENY:\n1. Sprawdź wszystkie LICZBY, DATY i KWOTY w SUMMARY. Jeśli którejś brakuje w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n2. Sprawdź wszystkie NAZWISKA, ORGANIZACJE i MIEJSCA w SUMMARY. Jeśli którejś brakuje w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n3. Sprawdź wszystkie konkretne DZIAŁANIA PRAWNE . Jeśli tego mechanizmu nie ma w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n\nWAŻNE: Abstrakcyjne pojęcia (np. \"transparentność\", \"zaufanie\") są dozwolone jako wnioski.\n\nOUTPUT (JSON):\n{\n  \"is_valid\": true/false,\n  \"issue\": \"fabricated_entity\" / \"contradiction\" / \"none\"\n}\n\nWYMAGANIA FORMATOWANIA:\n1. Odpowiedz WYŁĄCZNIE surowym obiektem JSON.\n2. NIE używaj bloków kodu Markdown.\n3. NIE dodawaj żadnych wstępów ani wyjaśnień przed ani po JSONie.\n4. JSON musi być poprawny i gotowy do parsowania.\n\n",
      "ai_response_raw": "{\n  \"is_valid\": true,\n  \"issue\": \"none\"\n}"
    },
    {
      "timestamp": "2026-04-21T11:23:27.659Z",
      "source_url": "https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/s4281/BILLS-119s4281is.htm",
      "model": "gemini-flash-latest",
      "prompt_sent": "\nJesteś ekspertem od prawa Stanów Zjednoczonych, który ma za zadanie analizować dokumenty ustaw, uchwał oraz innych dokumentów legislacyjnych, a następnie przygotowywać z nich informacje w przystępny sposób dla obywateli. Twoim celem jest przedstawienie informacji tak, aby obywatele mogli sami ocenić wpływ legislacji na ich życie, nawet bez posiadania specjalistycznej wiedzy legislacyjnej. Skup się na faktach i obiektywnych skutkach wprowadzanych zmian, unikając wartościowania i osobistych opinii. Wszelki żargon prawny jest zabroniony. Prezentuj informacje w jasny, zwięzły i angażujący sposób, tak aby były zrozumiałe dla osoby bez wykształcenia prawniczego. Unikaj długich, złożonych zdań. Zamiast pisać \"projekt ma na celu nowelizację kodeksu podatkowego...\", napisz \"Zmiany w podatkach: nowe ulgi i obowiązki dla...\". Kontynuuj swoją pracę, dopóki nie rozwiążesz swojego zadania. Jeśli nie masz pewności co do generowanej treści, przeanalizuj dokument ponownie – nie zgaduj. Rozplanuj dobrze swoje zadanie przed przystąpieniem do niego. W podsumowaniu i kluczowych punktach, jeśli to możliwe i uzasadnione, podkreśl, jakie konkretne korzyści lub skutki (pozytywne lub negatywne) wprowadza ustawa dla życia codziennego obywateli, ich praw i obowiązków, finansów osobistych, bezpieczeństwa i innych ważnych kwestii (np. kategorycznych zakazów i nakazów czy najważniejszych konkretnych alokacji finansowych i terytorialnych).\n\nTwoja odpowiedź MUSI być w formacie JSON - i zawierać następujące klucze.\nZanim zwrócisz odpowiedź, dokładnie zweryfikuj, czy cała struktura JSON jest w 100% poprawna, włącznie ze wszystkimi przecinkami, nawiasami klamrowymi, kwadratowymi oraz cudzysłowami. Błędny JSON jest nieakceptowalny i uniemożliwi przetworzenie Twojej pracy.\n\nPrzeanalizuj dokładnie poniższy tekst dokumentu prawnego. To jest treść, na podstawie której masz wygenerować podsumowanie i kluczowe punkty:\n--- POCZĄTEK DOKUMENTU ---\n[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [S. 4281 Introduced in Senate (IS)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session S. 4281 To provide for export restrictions on certain semiconductor manufacturing equipment and components therefor, and for other purposes. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES April 13, 2026 Mr. Ricketts (for himself, Mr. Kim, Mr. Risch, and Mr. Schumer) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To provide for export restrictions on certain semiconductor manufacturing equipment and components therefor, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Multilateral Alignment of Technology Controls on Hardware (MATCH) Act''. SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS. It is the sense of Congress that-- (1) export controls on semiconductor manufacturing equipment and components represent one of the United States most effective defenses of this foundational technology; (2) advanced computing applications like artificial intelligence are transforming military affairs and the balance of power; (3) the United States and its allies have an advantage in the foundational technologies that underpin advanced computing applications, including advanced-node integrated circuits and the equipment and software required to design and produce advanced-node integrated circuits; (4) robust controls on semiconductor manufacturing equipment and components have been a bipartisan priority across multiple administrations, reflecting a shared recognition that protecting America's semiconductor advantage is essential to national security; (5) the adversaries of the United States are exploiting gaps in the current export control regime; (6) certain entities, including ChangXin Memory Technologies, Hua Hong Semiconductor Limited, Huawei Technologies Company, Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation, and Yangtze Memory Technologies Corporation are engaged in efforts to produce advanced-node integrated circuits that are especially crucial for the Military-Civil Fusion efforts of the People's Republic of China and warrant comprehensive export controls to prevent those companies from accessing items made with United States technologies; (7) companies located in adversary countries that produce semiconductor manufacturing equipment are critical to adversaries' efforts to overcome exports controls to develop advanced-node integrated circuit production capabilities, and such companies should not be permitted to utilize or benefit from United States or allied technology or components; (8) the United States Government should work closely with allies and partners of the United States to align export controls on semiconductor manufacturing equipment and components to prevent gaps in controls, reduce the risk of circumvention, and ensure a level global playing field; and (9) securing a diplomatic agreement, including through the use of positive incentives to encourage adoption of these controls, is the best and most sustainable path to alignment. SEC. 3. REPORT AND APPLICATION OF CONTROLS. (a) Identifying Chokepoints.--Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the covered agency heads shall-- (1) jointly conduct a review to identify all covered semiconductor manufacturing equipment and all covered facilities; and (2) shall-- (A) submit to the appropriate congressional committees a list of all such equipment and facilities; and (B) notify the public in the Federal Register when this submission has occurred. (b) Diplomatic Engagement.-- (1) In general.--The covered agency heads shall prioritize and, upon the date of the enactment of this Act, immediately engage in diplomatic efforts to encourage the governments of allied supplier countries to adopt-- (A) countrywide controls, or other policies that have the same practical effect as countrywide controls, on covered semiconductor manufacturing equipment that are subject to the jurisdiction of such allied supplier country; and (B) license requirements for the export of all applicable items to any covered facility and the servicing of all applicable items at any covered facility, with a policy of denying such license. (2) Briefing on diplomatic efforts.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the covered agency heads shall provide a briefing to members of the appropriate congressional committees that-- (A) describes the status of diplomatic efforts to secure the adoption by allied supplier countries of the controls described in paragraph (1); (B) outlines and assesses positive incentives to encourage adoption of these controls; and (C) identifies-- (i) countries that have not adopted the controls described in paragraph (1)(A); (ii) countries that have not adopted the controls described in paragraph (1)(B); and (iii) measures that the United States has taken to implement the controls described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (1). (c) Application of Controls and Exhaustion of Diplomatic Recourse.-- (1) Application of controls.--Not later than 150 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall issue regulations that-- (A) apply countrywide controls to covered semiconductor manufacturing equipment produced in the United States; and (B) apply comprehensive end-user or end-use restrictions to all covered facilities located in countries of concern. (2) Exhaustion of diplomatic recourse.--Except as provided in paragraph (4), for each allied supplier country, the covered agency heads shall jointly certify, not later than 150 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, to the appropriate congressional committees that either-- (A) the country has implemented-- (i) countrywide controls, or policies that have the same practical effect, on all semiconductor manufacturing equipment that is subject to the jurisdiction of the allied supplier country; and (ii) licensing requirements, with a policy of denying the license, for the export of all applicable items to any covered facility, or other policies with the same practical effect; or (B)(i) the country has not adopted the controls described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of subsection (b)(1); (ii) the covered agency heads have prioritized and exhausted available diplomatic channels; (iii) such channels have failed to secure export controls from the allied supplier country that have the same practical effect as those described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of subsection (b)(1); and (iv) continued delay would materially undermine the national security of the United States. (3) Extension of controls.--For each allied supplier country for which the covered agency heads submitted a certification described in paragraph (2)(B), the Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall issue regulations that-- (A) establish jurisdiction over and apply countrywide controls, by directly controlling the equipment, indirectly restricting the end-use of essential components of such equipment, or both, to covered semiconductor manufacturing equipment exported from the allied supplier country; (B) require a license for the servicing of any applicable item that is also subject to the jurisdiction of the allied supplier country in any covered facility located in a country of concern and implement a policy of denying the license for such servicing; and (C) establish jurisdiction over applicable items from the allied supplier country and apply end-user or end-use controls prohibiting the export of such items to any covered facility. (4) National security waiver.--The covered agency heads may jointly grant a one-time waiver to extend the 150-day deadline for certification under paragraph (2) by not more than 90 days, if the covered agency heads, with concurrence from the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Energy, jointly-- (A) submit a report to the appropriate congressional committees describing-- (i) justification for why the deadline could not be met; and (ii) the interim steps the covered agency heads have taken to prevent stockpiling; and (B) determine and certify to the appropriate congressional committees that-- (i) the extension is in the national security interest of the United States, despite the risk that countries of concern may take advantage of the delay to further stockpile covered semiconductor manufacturing equipment; and (ii) the government of the allied supplier country is taking concrete, verifiable steps, pursuant to their domestic laws and regulations and as expeditiously as possible, to adopt and implement controls that have the same practical effect as, or are more stringent than, the controls that would otherwise be imposed under paragraph (3). (d) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the covered agency heads shall provide to the appropriate congressional committees a report that includes-- (1) a list of all covered semiconductor manufacturing equipment; (2) a list of all entities that own or operate a covered facility; (3) the scope of the countrywide controls imposed by the United States and allied supplier countries on each covered semiconductor manufacturing equipment identified pursuant to paragraph (1); (4) a summary of diplomatic engagements and unilateral actions undertaken by the covered agency heads in the 12-months period prior to the submission of the report to close any gap among allied supplier countries in the countrywide controls imposed by such countries for covered semiconductor manufacturing equipment; and (5) a certification that the export of any covered semiconductor manufacturing equipment to a country of concern and the export of any applicable items to any covered facility, or servicing of any such item located in a country of concern, requires a license issued by the United States or an allied supplier country, with a policy of denying such license. (e) Termination and Reimposition of Controls Upon Allied Action.-- (1) Termination or modification.--The Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with the Secretary of State, may terminate or modify any control imposed under subsection (c)(3) for items exported from an allied supplier country, if the country has established controls, including licensing policies, that have the same practical effect as those described in subsection (b)(1). (2) Reimposition.--If, after terminating or modifying a control under paragraph (1), the covered agency heads determine that the allied supplier country has materially weakened, suspended, or revoked the control that justified the termination or modification under paragraph (1), the Secretary of Commerce shall, in consultation with the Secretary of State and not later than 60 days after making such determination-- (A) notify the appropriate congressional committees of such determination; and (B) reimpose the control under subsection (c)(3) that was terminated or modified under paragraph (1). (f) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this Act may be construed as diminishing or superseding the authority of the Secretary of Commerce to control the export, reexport, or in-country transfer of items under the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 (50 U.S.C. 4801 et seq.). (g) Definitions.--In this section: (1) Advanced-node integrated circuits.--The term ``advanced-node integrated circuits'' has the meaning given that term in section 772.1 of the Export Administration Regulations. (2) Allied supplier country.--The term ``allied supplier country'' means any country that-- (A) is not a country of concern; and (B) is engaged in the production of covered semiconductor manufacturing equipment. (3) Applicable item.--The term ``applicable item'' means any item that is or can be made subject to the Export Administration Regulations, including-- (A) a United States-origin item; (B) a foreign-produced item that is the direct product of, or produced by plants or major components that are the direct product of, United States-origin software or technology subject to the Export Administration Regulations; (C) a foreign-produced item with more than zero percent de minimis United States-origin content; and (D) a foreign-produced item that contain United States-origin or foreign-produced integrated circuits that are presumptively designed or produced, directly or indirectly, with technology, software, or equipment that is subject to the Export Administration Regulations. (4) Appropriate congressional committees.--The term ``appropriate congressional committees'' means-- (A) the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and (B) the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. (5) Capabilities comparable to those of the product sold by the global market leader.--The term ``capabilities comparable to those of the product sold by the global market leader'' means, considering cost, throughput, reliability, precision, and any other relevant factors, advanced-node integrated circuit makers headquartered outside of countries of concern, when selecting a tool for use in high-volume manufacturing, would be indifferent about using, or would prefer to use, the tool produced by the country of concern, rather than a tool sold by the company with the greatest share of the global market for tools used to accomplish the same function. (6) Country of concern.--The term ``country of concern'' has the meaning given the term ``covered nation'' in section 4872(f) of title 10, United States Code. (7) Countrywide controls.--The term ``countrywide controls'' means licensing requirements, with a policy of denying any such license, for the export, reexport, in-country transfer, or servicing of specified items to any destination within a country of concern, excluding exports where the destination is a fabrication facility that existed as of the date of the enactment of this Act and remains owned and operated by a company headquartered, and the ultimate parent company of which is headquartered, outside of any country of concern. (8) Covered agency heads.--The term ``covered agency heads'' means the Secretary of Commerce, acting through the Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security, and the Secretary of State. (9) Covered facility.--The term ``covered facility'' means-- (A) a facility engaged in the production of advanced-node integrated circuits which is owned or operated by an entity headquartered in, or whose ultimate parent company is headquartered in, a country of concern; or (B) any facility owned or operated by, or in common ownership or control with-- (i) any entity referenced in subparagraphs (A) or (B) of section 5949(j)(3) of the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 (Public Law 117-263; 41 U.S.C. 4713 note); (ii) Hua Hong Semiconductor Limited; (iii) Huawei Technologies Company; (iv) any producer, manufacturer, or developer of semiconductor manufacturing equipment that is headquartered in, or the ultimate parent company of which is headquartered in, a country of concern; or (v) any entity that is a subsidiary, affiliate, or successor to, or has a joint venture, teaming agreement, joint development or research agreement, technology transfer or collaboration agreement, or other similar type of arrangement with an entity described in any of clauses (i) through (iv). (10) Covered semiconductor manufacturing equipment.--The term ``covered semiconductor manufacturing equipment''-- (A) means semiconductor manufacturing equipment or a component therefor that-- (i) is an applicable item; and (ii) the covered agency heads determine no country of concern produces in sufficient volumes and with capabilities comparable to those of the product sold by the global market leader, as of the date of the enactment of this Act; and (B) includes, at a minimum-- (i) all semiconductor manufacturing equipment, materials, and software that, as of the date of the enactment of this Act, require a license for the export, reexport, or in- country transfer to any destination in a country of concern; (ii) all deep ultraviolet immersion photolithography machines, through silicon via deposition and etch tools, cryogenic etch equipment, and cobalt deposition equipment; and (iii) all semiconductor manufacturing equipment or components specified in Export Control Classification Number 3B993 (as in effect on the date of the enactment of this Act) except any item the covered agency heads determine do not meet the requirements of subparagraph (A). (11) Export; in-country transfer; reexport; export administration regulation.--The terms ``export'', ``in-country transfer'', ``reexport'', and ``Export Administration Regulations'' have the meanings given such terms in section 1742 of the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 (50 U.S.C. 4801). (12) In sufficient volumes.--The term ``in sufficient volumes'' means in volumes sufficient to meet 75 percent of current demand from all countries of concern. (13) Servicing.--The term ``servicing'' means any servicing of equipment or components, whether in-person or remote, including installation, calibration, repair, overhauling, refurbishing, testing, diagnosing, updating software or firmware, training, field services, application support engineering, customization, technical assistance, process adjustments, troubleshooting, and transfer of industry best practices for maintenance. <all>\n--- KONIEC DOKUMENTU ---\n\nPAMIĘTAJ: Twoja odpowiedź MUSI być wyłącznie poprawnym obiektem JSON. Nie dodawaj żadnych dodatkowych znaków, komentarzy ani tekstu przed znacznikiem '{' ani po znaczniku '}'. Cała odpowiedź musi być parsowalna jako JSON.\nNa podstawie POWYŻSZEGO dokumentu, wypełnij poniższą strukturę JSON:\nOto struktura JSON, której oczekuję (wypełnij ją treścią):\n{\n  \"pl_ai_title\": \"Nowy, krótki tytuł dla aktu prawnego po polsku, oddający sedno wprowadzanych zmian (np. maksymalnie 10-12 słów).\",\n  \"pl_summary\": \"2-3 zdania zwięzłego podsumowania treści aktu prawnego po polsku, napisane z perspektywy wpływu na życie codzienne obywateli.\",\n  \"pl_key_points\": [\n    \"Pierwszy krótki punkt po polsku dotyczący najważniejszych wprowadzanych rozwiązań lub zmian.\",\n    \"Drugi krótki punkt po polsku...\"\n  ],\n  \"eng_ai_title\": \"A new, short title for the legal act in English, capturing the essence of the changes (e.g., max 10-12 words).\",\n  \"eng_summary\": \"2-3 sentences summarizing the legal act in English, from the perspective of its impact on citizens' daily lives.\",\n  \"eng_key_points\": [\n    \"First short bullet point in English regarding the most important solutions or changes being introduced.\",\n    \"Second short bullet point in English...\"\n  ],\n  \"de_ai_title\": \"Ein neuer, kurzer Titel für das Rechtsdokument auf Deutsch, der den Kern der Änderungen erfasst (z.B. max. 10-12 Wörter).\",\n  \"de_summary\": \"2-3 Sätze Zusammenfassung des Rechtsdokuments auf Deutsch, aus der Perspektive seiner Auswirkungen auf das tägliche Leben der Bürger.\",\n  \"de_key_points\": [\n    \"Erster kurzer Stichpunkt auf Deutsch zu den wichtigsten eingeführten Lösungen oder Änderungen.\",\n    \"Zweiter kurzer Stichpunkt auf Deutsch...\"\n  ],\n  \"fr_ai_title\": \"Un nouveau titre court pour l'acte juridique en français, saisissant l'essence des changements (par exemple, 10-12 mots maximum).\",\n  \"fr_summary\": \"Résumé de 2-3 phrases de l'acte juridique en français, du point de vue de son impact sur la vie quotidienne des citoyens.\",\n  \"fr_key_points\": [\n    \"Premier court point en français concernant les solutions ou changements les plus importants introduits.\",\n    \"Deuxième court point en français...\"\n  ],\n  \"es_ai_title\": \"Un nuevo título breve para el acto jurídico en español, que recoja la esencia de los cambios (por ejemplo, máximo 10-12 palabras).\",\n  \"es_summary\": \"Resumen de 2-3 frases del acto jurídico en español, desde la perspectiva de su impacto en la vida cotidiana de los ciudadanos.\",\n  \"es_key_points\": [\n    \"Primer punto breve en español sobre las soluciones o cambios más importantes que se introducen.\",\n    \"Segundo punto breve en español...\"\n  ],\n  \"it_ai_title\": \"Un nuovo titolo breve per l'atto giuridico in italiano, che colga l'essenza delle modifiche (ad es. massimo 10-12 parole).\",\n  \"it_summary\": \"Riepilogo di 2-3 frasi dell'atto giuridico in italiano, dal punto di vista del suo impatto sulla vita quotidiana dei cittadini.\",\n  \"it_key_points\": [\n    \"Primo breve punto in italiano riguardante le soluzioni o le modifiche più importanti introdotte.\",\n    \"Secondo breve punto in italiano...\"\n  ],\n  \"nl_ai_title\": \"Een nieuwe, korte titel voor de rechtshandeling in het Nederlands, die de essentie van de wijzigingen weergeeft (bijv. max. 10-12 woorden).\",\n  \"nl_summary\": \"Samenvatting van 2-3 zinnen van de rechtshandeling in het Nederlands, vanuit het perspectief van de impact op het dagelijks leven van burgers.\",\n  \"nl_key_points\": [\n    \"Eerste korte punt in het Nederlands betreffende de belangrijkste geïntroduceerde oplossingen of wijzigingen.\",\n    \"Tweede korte punt in het Nederlands...\"\n  ],\n  \"pt_ai_title\": \"Um novo título curto para o ato jurídico em português, capturando a essência das mudanças (por exemplo, máx. 10-12 palavras).\",\n  \"pt_summary\": \"Resumo de 2-3 frases do ato jurídico em português, na perspetiva do seu impacto na vida quotidiana dos cidadãos.\",\n  \"pt_key_points\": [\n    \"Primeiro ponto curto em português sobre as soluções ou alterações mais importantes introduzidas.\",\n    \"Segundo ponto curto em português...\"\n  ],\n  \"category\": [\"Categorize the document into one category by default, based on the field it primarily concerns. Choose up to 3 if the document also touches upon SIGNIFICANT issues from other categories. You MUST select categories ONLY from the following list: Health, Education, Family, Taxes, Labor, Security, Environment, Courts and Law, Transport, Benefits, Real Estate, Media and Culture, Local Government, Migration, Agriculture, Public Investments, Informatization, Economy. If the document does not definitively fit any of these, you MUST use \"Other\". If you use \"Other\", it should be the ONLY category selected. Do NOT invent new categories. The response must be an array of strings, e.g., [\"Taxes\", \"Family\"].\"]\n}\n\n",
      "ai_response_raw": "{\n  \"pl_ai_title\": \"Ustawa MATCH: Ograniczenia eksportu technologii produkcji nowoczesnych procesorów\",\n  \"pl_summary\": \"Ustawa wprowadza surowe kontrole eksportu maszyn do produkcji zaawansowanych chipów, aby chronić bezpieczeństwo narodowe USA. Ma to na celu uniemożliwienie krajom rywalizującym dostępu do technologii kluczowych dla rozwoju sztucznej inteligencji i nowoczesnego wojska.\",\n  \"pl_key_points\": [\n    \"Wprowadzenie zakazu sprzedaży nowoczesnych maszyn do produkcji procesorów do krajów budzących obawy.\",\n    \"Wymóg ścisłej współpracy z sojusznikami w celu ujednolicenia zasad handlu technologią na świecie.\",\n    \"Ograniczenia w serwisowaniu, naprawach i aktualizacjach sprzętu, który już znajduje się w krajach objętych restrykcjami.\",\n    \"Coroczna identyfikacja kluczowych technologii i fabryk, które muszą zostać objęte ochroną eksportową.\",\n    \"Możliwość nałożenia kar lub ograniczeń na firmy z krajów sojuszniczych, jeśli nie dostosują się do amerykańskich standardów ochrony technologii.\"\n  ],\n  \"eng_ai_title\": \"MATCH Act: New Export Restrictions on Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology\",\n  \"eng_summary\": \"This act limits the export of advanced chip-making equipment to protect national security and maintain a technological lead. It aims to prevent rival nations from using Western technology to build advanced AI and military systems.\",\n  \"eng_key_points\": [\n    \"Strict bans on exporting advanced semiconductor manufacturing tools to specific countries of concern.\",\n    \"Diplomatic efforts to ensure international allies adopt similar trade restrictions to prevent technology leaks.\",\n    \"New licensing requirements for servicing, repairing, and updating high-tech equipment already located abroad.\",\n    \"Annual reviews to identify critical technology 'chokepoints' and facilities that must be protected.\",\n    \"Power to impose restrictions on equipment from allied countries if they fail to implement comparable export controls.\"\n  ],\n  \"de_ai_title\": \"MATCH-Gesetz: Neue Exportbeschränkungen für Technologien zur Halbleiterherstellung\",\n  \"de_summary\": \"Dieses Gesetz schränkt den Export von Maschinen zur Herstellung fortschrittlicher Computerchips ein, um die nationale Sicherheit zu gewährleisten. Es soll verhindern, dass Konkurrenzstaaten westliche Technologie für KI und militärische Zwecke nutzen.\",\n  \"de_key_points\": [\n    \"Verbot des Exports von Chip-Produktionsanlagen in Länder, die als Sicherheitsrisiko eingestuft werden.\",\n    \"Zusammenarbeit mit Verbündeten, um weltweit einheitliche Exportregeln für Hochtechnologie zu schaffen.\",\n    \"Neue Lizenzen für die Wartung, Reparatur und Software-Updates von Geräten im Ausland erforderlich.\",\n    \"Jährliche Berichte über kritische Technologien, die für den technologischen Vorsprung der USA entscheidend sind.\",\n    \"Maßnahmen gegen Unternehmen aus Partnerländern, falls diese keine vergleichbaren Sicherheitskontrollen einführen.\"\n  ],\n  \"fr_ai_title\": \"Loi MATCH : Nouvelles restrictions sur l'exportation de technologies de semi-conducteurs\",\n  \"fr_summary\": \"Cette loi limite l'exportation d'équipements de fabrication de puces avancées pour protéger la sécurité nationale. Elle vise à empêcher les pays rivaux d'utiliser la technologie occidentale pour l'IA et la défense.\",\n  \"fr_key_points\": [\n    \"Interdiction d'exporter des outils de production de puces vers des pays jugés préoccupants.\",\n    \"Coopération diplomatique avec les alliés pour harmoniser les règles commerciales technologiques mondiales.\",\n    \"Nouvelles licences obligatoires pour l'entretien, la réparation et la mise à jour des équipements à l'étranger.\",\n    \"Identification annuelle des technologies clés et des installations devant faire l'objet d'une protection stricte.\",\n    \"Possibilité d'imposer des restrictions aux pays alliés qui n'adoptent pas de contrôles d'exportation similaires.\"\n  ],\n  \"es_ai_title\": \"Ley MATCH: Nuevas restricciones a la exportación de tecnología de semiconductores\",\n  \"es_summary\": \"Esta ley limita la exportación de maquinaria para fabricar chips avanzados con el fin de proteger la seguridad nacional. Busca evitar que países rivales usen tecnología occidental para desarrollar inteligencia artificial y armamento.\",\n  \"es_key_points\": [\n    \"Prohibición de exportar herramientas de fabricación de chips a países que representen una preocupación de seguridad.\",\n    \"Esfuerzos diplomáticos para que los países aliados adopten restricciones comerciales similares y evitar fugas tecnológicas.\",\n    \"Nuevos requisitos de licencia para el mantenimiento, reparación y actualización de equipos en el extranjero.\",\n    \"Revisiones anuales para identificar tecnologías críticas que deben ser protegidas obligatoriamente.\",\n    \"Capacidad de restringir productos de países aliados si estos no implementan controles de exportación comparables.\"\n  ],\n  \"it_ai_title\": \"Legge MATCH: Nuove restrizioni all'esportazione di tecnologie per la produzione di semiconduttori\",\n  \"it_summary\": \"Questa legge limita l'esportazione di macchinari per la produzione di chip avanzati per proteggere la sicurezza nazionale. L'obiettivo è impedire ai paesi rivali di usare la tecnologia occidentale per l'IA e scopi militari.\",\n  \"it_key_points\": [\n    \"Divieto di esportare strumenti per la produzione di chip verso nazioni considerate una minaccia alla sicurezza.\",\n    \"Collaborazione con gli alleati per uniformare le regole del commercio tecnologico a livello globale.\",\n    \"Nuovi obblighi di licenza per l'assistenza, la riparazione e l'aggiornamento di apparecchiature già all'estero.\",\n    \"Monitoraggio annuale delle tecnologie chiave che garantiscono il vantaggio competitivo e la sicurezza.\",\n    \"Possibilità di limitare le importazioni da paesi alleati che non adottano controlli sulle esportazioni simili a quelli USA.\"\n  ],\n  \"nl_ai_title\": \"MATCH-wet: Nieuwe exportbeperkingen op technologie voor de productie van halfgeleiders\",\n  \"nl_summary\": \"Deze wet beperkt de export van geavanceerde machines voor het maken van chips om de nationale veiligheid te beschermen. Het doel is te voorkomen dat rivaliserende landen westerse technologie gebruiken voor AI en defensie.\",\n  \"nl_key_points\": [\n    \"Verbod op de export van chip-productiemiddelen naar landen die een veiligheidsrisico vormen.\",\n    \"Diplomatieke druk op bondgenoten om vergelijkbare handelsbeperkingen in te voeren voor een gelijk speelveld.\",\n    \"Nieuwe vergunningsplichten voor het onderhoud, de reparatie en het updaten van apparatuur in het buitenland.\",\n    \"Jaarlijkse identificatie van cruciale technologieën die essentieel zijn voor de nationale veiligheid.\",\n    \"Maatregelen tegen bedrijven uit bondgenoot-landen als zij geen vergelijkbare exportcontroles handhaven.\"\n  ],\n  \"pt_ai_title\": \"Lei MATCH: Novas restrições à exportação de tecnologia de fabrico de semicondutores\",\n  \"pt_summary\": \"Esta lei limita a exportação de máquinas para fabricar chips avançados para proteger a segurança nacional. O objetivo é impedir que países rivais utilizem tecnologia ocidental para inteligência artificial e fins militares.\",\n  \"pt_key_points\": [\n    \"Proibição de exportar ferramentas de produção de chips para países que geram preocupação de segurança.\",\n    \"Esforços diplomáticos para que os aliados adotem restrições comerciais semelhantes e evitem lacunas no controlo.\",\n    \"Novos requisitos de licenciamento para a manutenção, reparação e atualização de equipamentos no estrangeiro.\",\n    \"Revisões anuais para identificar tecnologias e instalações críticas que devem ser protegidas.\",\n    \"Poder para restringir equipamentos de países aliados caso estes não implementem controlos de exportação equivalentes.\"\n  ],\n  \"category\": [\"Security\", \"Economy\", \"Informatization\"]\n}"
    }
  ]
}