{
  "legislationId": "119_S_4300",
  "lastUpdate": "2026-04-29T11:25:47.086Z",
  "history": [
    {
      "timestamp": "2026-04-29T11:25:47.086Z",
      "source_url": "https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/s4300/BILLS-119s4300is.htm",
      "model": "gemini-flash-lite-latest",
      "prompt_sent": "\nROLE: Fact Checker.\nZADANIE: Porównaj SOURCE (oryginał) i SUMMARY (streszczenie przygotowane przez inne AI).\n\nTwoim celem jest wykrycie \"ZMYŚLONYCH KONKRETÓW\" (Fabricated Entities) w SUMMARY.\n\nSOURCE:\n[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [S. 4300 Introduced in Senate (IS)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session S. 4300 To promote interagency coordination for reviewing certain authorizations under the Natural Gas Act, and for other purposes. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES April 15 (legislative day, April 14), 2026 Mr. Cotton introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To promote interagency coordination for reviewing certain authorizations under the Natural Gas Act, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Jurisdictional Oversight and Adjudication for Natural Gas Act'' or the ``JOAN Act''. SEC. 2. PROMOTING INTERAGENCY COORDINATION FOR REVIEW OF NATURAL GAS INFRASTRUCTURE. (a) Definitions.--In this section: (1) Commission.--The term ``Commission'' means the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. (2) Federal authorization.--The term ``Federal authorization'' has the meaning given that term in section 15(a) of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717n(a)). (3) NEPA review.--The term ``NEPA review'' means the process of reviewing a proposed Federal action under section 102 of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332). (4) Project-related nepa review.--The term ``project- related NEPA review'' means any NEPA review required to be conducted with respect to the issuance of an authorization under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717b) or a certificate of public convenience and necessity under section 7 of such Act (15 U.S.C. 717f). (b) Commission NEPA Review Responsibilities.--In acting as the lead agency under section 15(b)(1) of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717n(b)(1)) for the purposes of complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) with respect to an authorization under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717b) or a certificate of public convenience and necessity under section 7 of such Act (15 U.S.C. 717f), the Commission shall, in accordance with this section and other applicable Federal law-- (1) be the only lead agency; (2) coordinate as early as practicable with each agency designated as a participating agency under subsection (d)(3) to ensure that the Commission develops information in conducting its project-related NEPA review that is reasonably required by the participating agency in considering an aspect of an application for a Federal authorization for which the agency is responsible; and (3) take such actions as are necessary and proper to facilitate the expeditious resolution of its project-related NEPA review. (c) Deference to Commission.--In making a decision with respect to a Federal authorization required with respect to an application for authorization under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717b) or a certificate of public convenience and necessity under section 7 of such Act (15 U.S.C. 717f), each agency shall give deference, to the maximum extent authorized by law, to the scope of the project-related NEPA review that the Commission determines to be appropriate. (d) Participating Agencies.-- (1) Identification.--The Commission shall identify, not later than 30 days after the Commission receives an application for an authorization under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717b) or a certificate of public convenience and necessity under section 7 of such Act (15 U.S.C. 717f), any Federal or State agency, local government, or Indian Tribe that may issue a Federal authorization or is required by Federal law to consult with the Commission in conjunction with the issuance of a Federal authorization required for such authorization or certificate. (2) Invitation.-- (A) In general.--Not later than 45 days after the Commission receives an application for an authorization under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717b) or a certificate of public convenience and necessity under section 7 of such Act (15 U.S.C. 717f), the Commission shall invite any agency identified under paragraph (1) to participate in the review process for the applicable Federal authorization. (B) Deadline.--An invitation issued under subparagraph (A) shall establish a deadline by which a response to the invitation shall be submitted to the Commission, which may be extended by the Commission for good cause. (3) Designation as participating agencies.--Not later than 60 days after the Commission receives an application for an authorization under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717b) or a certificate of public convenience and necessity under section 7 of such Act (15 U.S.C. 717f), the Commission shall designate an agency identified under paragraph (1) as a participating agency with respect to an application for authorization under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717b) or a certificate of public convenience and necessity under section 7 of such Act (15 U.S.C. 717f) unless the agency informs the Commission, in writing, by the deadline established pursuant to paragraph (2)(B), that the agency-- (A) has no jurisdiction or authority with respect to the applicable Federal authorization; (B) has no special expertise or information relevant to any project-related NEPA review; or (C) does not intend to submit comments for the record for the project-related NEPA review conducted by the Commission. (4) Effect of designation and non-designation.--Designation or non-designation of an agency as a participating agency under paragraph (3) with respect to an application for an authorization under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717b) or a certificate of public convenience and necessity under section 7 of such Act (15 U.S.C. 717f) may not serve as evidence of an incomplete record before a court. (e) Water Quality Impacts.-- (1) In general.--Notwithstanding section 401 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1341), an applicant for a Federal authorization shall not be required to provide a certification under such section with respect to the Federal authorization. (2) Coordination.--With respect to any NEPA review for a Federal authorization to conduct an activity that will directly result in a discharge into the navigable waters (within the meaning of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.)), the Commission shall identify as an agency under subsection (d)(1) the State in which the discharge originates or will originate, or, if appropriate, the interstate water pollution control agency having jurisdiction over the navigable waters at the point where the discharge originates or will originate. (3) Proposed conditions.--A State or interstate agency designated as a participating agency pursuant to paragraph (2) may propose to the Commission terms or conditions for inclusion in an authorization under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717b) or a certificate of public convenience and necessity under section 7 of such Act (15 U.S.C. 717f) that the State or interstate agency determines are necessary to ensure that any activity described in paragraph (2) conducted pursuant to such authorization or certification will comply with the applicable provisions of sections 301, 302, 303, 306, and 307 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1311, 1312, 1313, 1316, 1317). (4) Commission consideration of conditions.--The Commission may include a term or condition in an authorization under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717b) or a certificate of public convenience and necessity under section 7 of such Act (15 U.S.C. 717f) proposed by a State or interstate agency under paragraph (3) only if the Commission finds that the term or condition is necessary to ensure that any activity described in paragraph (2) conducted pursuant to such authorization or certification will comply with the applicable provisions of sections 301, 302, 303, 306, and 307 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1311, 1312, 1313, 1316, 1317). (f) Schedule.-- (1) Deadline for federal authorizations.--A deadline for a Federal authorization required with respect to an application for authorization under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717b) or a certificate of public convenience and necessity under section 7 of such Act (15 U.S.C. 717f) set by the Commission under section 15(c)(1) of such Act (15 U.S.C. 717n(c)(1)) shall be not later than 90 days after the Commission completes its project-related NEPA review, unless an applicable schedule is otherwise established by Federal law. (2) Concurrent reviews.--Each Federal and State agency-- (A) that may consider an application for a Federal authorization required with respect to an application for authorization under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717b) or a certificate of public convenience and necessity under section 7 of such Act (15 U.S.C. 717f) shall formulate and implement a plan for administrative, policy, and procedural mechanisms to enable the agency to ensure completion of Federal authorizations in compliance with schedules established by the Commission under section 15(c)(1) of such Act (15 U.S.C. 717n(c)(1)); and (B) in considering an aspect of an application for a Federal authorization required with respect to an application for authorization under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717b) or a certificate of public convenience and necessity under section 7 of such Act (15 U.S.C. 717f), shall-- (i) formulate and implement a plan to enable the agency to comply with the schedule established by the Commission under section 15(c)(1) of such Act (15 U.S.C. 717n(c)(1)); (ii) carry out the obligations of that agency under applicable law concurrently, and in conjunction with, the project-related NEPA review conducted by the Commission, and in compliance with the schedule established by the Commission under section 15(c)(1) (15 U.S.C. 717n(c)(1)) of such Act, unless the agency notifies the Commission in writing that doing so would impair the ability of the agency to conduct needed analysis or otherwise carry out such obligations; (iii) transmit to the Commission a statement-- (I) acknowledging receipt of the schedule established by the Commission under section 15(c)(1) of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717n(c)(1)); and (II) setting forth the plan formulated under clause (i) of this subparagraph; (iv) not later than 30 days after the agency receives such application for a Federal authorization, transmit to the applicant a notice-- (I) indicating whether such application is ready for processing; and (II) if such application is not ready for processing, that includes a comprehensive description of the information needed for the agency to determine that the application is ready for processing; (v) determine that such application for a Federal authorization is ready for processing for purposes of clause (iv) if such application is sufficiently complete for the purposes of commencing consideration, regardless of whether supplemental information is necessary to enable the agency to complete the consideration required by law with respect to such application; and (vi) not less often than once every 90 days, transmit to the Commission a report describing the progress made in considering such application for a Federal authorization. (3) Failure to meet deadline.--If a Federal or State agency, including the Commission, fails to meet a deadline for a Federal authorization set forth in the schedule established by the Commission under section 15(c)(1) of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717n(c)(1)), not later than 5 days after such deadline, the head of the relevant Federal agency (including, in the case of a failure by a State agency, the Federal agency overseeing the delegated authority) shall notify Congress and the Commission of such failure and set forth a recommended implementation plan to ensure completion of the action to which such deadline applied. (g) Consideration of Applications for Federal Authorization.-- (1) Issue identification and resolution.-- (A) Identification.--Federal and State agencies that may consider an aspect of an application for a Federal authorization shall identify, as early as possible, any issues of concern that may delay or prevent an agency from working with the Commission to resolve such issues and granting such authorization. (B) Issue resolution.--The Commission may forward any issue of concern identified under subparagraph (A) to the heads of the relevant agencies (including, in the case of an issue of concern that is a failure by a State agency, the Federal agency overseeing the delegated authority, if applicable) for resolution. (2) Remote surveys.-- (A) In general.--If a Federal or State agency considering an aspect of an application for a Federal authorization requires the person applying for such authorization to submit data, the agency shall consider any such data gathered by aerial or other remote means that the person submits. (B) Conditional approval.--The agency may grant a conditional approval for the Federal authorization based on data gathered by aerial or remote means, conditioned on the verification of such data by subsequent onsite inspection. (3) Application processing.--The Commission, and Federal and State agencies, may allow a person applying for a Federal authorization to fund a third-party contractor to assist in reviewing the application for such authorization. (h) Accountability, Transparency, Efficiency.--For an application for an authorization under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717b) or a certificate of public convenience and necessity under section 7 of such Act (15 U.S.C. 717f) that requires multiple Federal authorizations, the Commission, with input from any Federal or State agency considering an aspect of the application, shall track and make available to the public on the website of the Commission information related to the actions required to complete the Federal authorizations. Such information shall include the following: (1) The schedule established by the Commission under section 15(c)(1) of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717n(c)(1)). (2) A list of all the actions required by each applicable agency to complete permitting, reviews, and other actions necessary to obtain a final decision on the application. (3) The expected completion date for each such action. (4) A point of contact at the agency responsible for each such action. (5) In the event that an action is still pending as of the expected date of completion, a brief explanation of the reasons for the delay. SEC. 3. ACCELERATION OF CLAIMS. (a) Definitions.--In this section: (1) Civil action.--The term ``civil action'' means an initial claim challenging a core authorization for a covered project. (2) Commission.--The term ``Commission'' means the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. (3) Core authorization.--The term ``core authorization'' means a Federal authorization issued pursuant to section 3(e) or section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717b(e), 717f(c)). (4) Covered project.--The term ``covered project'' means a project requiring a core authorization. (5) Federal authorization.--The term ``Federal authorization'' means any license, permit, approval, finding, determination, or administrative decision issued by an agency, and any interagency consultation that is required or authorized under Federal law, to site, construct, reconstruct, abandon, or commence operations of a covered project administered by-- (A) a Federal agency; or (B) in the case of a State participating in or administering a review required or authorized under Federal law, as applicable, a State agency. (6) Project sponsor.--The term ``project sponsor'' means any person, including a State, Tribal, or local government entity, that-- (A) is an applicant for, or holder of, a core authorization or any other Federal authorization for a covered project; or (B) otherwise proposes to site, construct, reconstruct, own, or operate a covered project. (7) Related claim.--The term ``related claim'' means a claim challenging a Federal authorization that is joined to a civil action after that civil action has been filed. (b) Final Agency Action.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, issuance of a core authorization for a covered project shall be considered a final agency action for the purposes of chapter 7 of title 5, United States Code, with respect to all Federal authorizations required for that covered project. (c) Claims.-- (1) Sole and exclusive relief.-- (A) In general.--The filing and final adjudication of a civil action shall constitute the sole and exclusive means of judicial review and relief with respect to the applicable covered project and all Federal authorizations issued for that covered project. (B) Bar on subsequent actions.--After the final adjudication of a civil action, any subsequent cause of action or challenge, whether statutory, procedural, or substantive, related to or connected with the applicable covered project or any Federal authorization for that covered project brought by any party except the project sponsor shall be barred and dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. (2) Venue.-- (A) In general.--A civil action shall be filed exclusively in-- (i) the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit; or (ii) the court of appeals of the United States for the judicial circuit in which the principal place of business of the project sponsor for the applicable covered project is located. (B) Related claims.--After a civil action is filed in an applicable court described in subparagraph (A), all related claims arising out of the same nucleus of operative fact as that civil action shall be joined or consolidated to that court for adjudication. (3) Time to file.--A civil action and all related claims arising out of the same nucleus of operative fact shall be filed with the applicable court by the earlier of-- (A) the date that is 60 days after the core authorization is published in the Federal Register; and (B) the statutory deadline required for causes of action relating to that core authorization. (4) Judicial review.-- (A) In general.--Subject to subsection (d), the filing and final adjudication of a civil action shall constitute the only opportunity for judicial review of the applicable covered project and all Federal authorizations issued for that covered project. (B) Scope.--Judicial review of a civil action and any related claim arising out of the same nucleus of operative fact under this section-- (i) shall-- (I) be limited to the finalized consolidated record under subsection (g)(3)(C); and (II) be based exclusively on that finalized consolidated record; and (ii) shall not take evidence, permit discovery, receive testimony, or engage in fact-finding. (C) Preliminary injunctions.-- (i) Multiplicative merit standard.--In any civil action seeking a preliminary injunction or a temporary restraining order to halt a Federal action based on an alleged violation of this Act, the applicable court shall determine the likelihood of success on the merits by calculating the cumulative probability of success across all independent legal and jurisdictional requirements. (ii) Probabilistic calculation.--A court may not find a likelihood of success on the merits under clause (i) unless the product of the probabilities of success for each independent legal and jurisdictional requirement, including standing under article III of the Constitution of the United States, final agency action, and the merits of the underlying claim, exceeds 50 percent. (iii) Written findings.--The court under clause (ii) shall issue written findings of fact and conclusions of law specifying-- (I) the estimated probability of success assigned to each independent legal and jurisdictional requirement; and (II) the cumulative probability of success. (D) Deadline.--If the applicable court does not issue a final determination for a filed civil action and all related claims arising out of the same nucleus of operative fact by the date that is 180 days after the expiration of the applicable timeline described in paragraph (3), the core authorization and all associated Federal authorizations for the applicable covered project shall be considered approved and not subject to further review. (E) Identification of factual determinations.--For the purposes of judicial review, the statements of material fact submitted under subsection (g)(2) shall not constitute independent evidence or a freestanding factual determination apart from the cited administrative record material. (5) Relief.-- (A) In general.--In reviewing a civil action, the applicable court may not-- (i) issue an injunction lasting for a period exceeding 60 days; (ii) enjoin any covered project activity unrelated to a specific issue identified by the court; or (iii) grant permanent injunctive relief unless the plaintiff demonstrates by clear and convincing evidence that-- (I) the plaintiff has suffered an irreparable injury; (II) remedies available at law, including monetary damages, are inadequate to compensate for the irreparable injury; (III) considering the balance of hardships between the plaintiff and defendant, a remedy in equity is warranted; and (IV) the public interest would not be disserved by a permanent injunction. (B) Permanent injunction.--Any permanent injunction issued by a court pursuant to this subsection shall be supported by a finding, by clear and convincing evidence, of extraordinary circumstances, and shall be as narrowly tailored as possible to correct the injury and the least intrusive means necessary to correct the injury. (C) Security for injunctive relief.--Any court issuing a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction in a civil action under this section shall require the movant to provide security in an amount that the court considers proper to pay the costs and damages sustained by any party found to have been wrongfully enjoined or restrained, consistent with rule 65(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (6) No remand with vacatur.--In reviewing a civil action, the applicable court may not issue a remedy of remand with vacatur. (7) Project segmentation.--After the filing of a civil action, the project sponsor for the implicated covered project may continue construction for any part of the covered project that is unaffected by the civil action. (8) Prohibited civil actions.--A civil action may not be filed by any party that did not raise the issue giving rise to that civil action during the notice and comment period for the applicable Federal authorization. (d) Project Sponsor Exception.-- (1) In general.--Notwithstanding subsection (c), a project sponsor may bring a separate claim challenging a Federal authorization for an applicable covered project regardless of whether a civil action concerning that Federal authorization has been filed and adjudicated, subject to the condition that the specific underlying issue of that separate claim has not previously been finally adjudicated. (2) No related claims.--A claim described in paragraph (1) may not be joined by a related claim or any other claim arising out of the same nucleus of operative fact. (e) Effect on Substantive Standards.--Nothing in this section alters substantive environmental requirements or reduces opportunities for public comment under applicable Federal law. (f) Multiple Core Authorizations.--If more than 1 Federal agency issues a core authorization for a covered project, the Commission shall be the lead agency for purposes of an environmental review for the covered project under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), if applicable. (g) Statement of Material Facts and Technical Findings.-- (1) Definition of statement of material fact.--In this subsection, the term ``statement of material fact'' means a citation index identifying, by specific record citation, the portions of the administrative record that set forth the material factual determinations and technical conclusions relied on in a Federal authorization for a covered project. (2) Transmission.--Not later than 60 days after the date of publication of a core authorization in the Federal Register, each Federal agency that issued, or is required to issue, a Federal authorization for the applicable covered project shall submit to the Commission-- (A) the administrative record for that Federal authorization; and (B) a statement of material fact and technical conclusions that identifies, by specific citation to the administrative record, the portions of the record containing the material factual determinations and technical conclusions relied on by the Federal agency. (3) Consolidated administrative record.-- (A) Consolidate and publish.--Not later than 90 days after the date of publication of a core authorization in the Federal Register, the Commission shall-- (i) consolidate the submissions under paragraph (2) (referred to in this subsection as the ``consolidated administrative record''); and (ii) publish a notice of availability of the consolidated administrative record. (B) Objections.-- (i) In general.--Not later than 30 days after the date of publication of the notice under subparagraph (A), any party may submit to the Commission a written objection limited to whether the consolidated administrative record omits materials-- (I) that were before the Federal agency; and (II) that were directly or indirectly considered in issuing a Federal authorization. (ii) No merits.--An objection to the consolidated administrative record submitted under clause (i) may not-- (I) raise merit arguments; or (II) seek discovery, testimony, or new evidence. (iii) Resolution.--Not later than 60 days after the date of publication of the notice under subparagraph (A), the Commission shall resolve each objection to the consolidated administrative record submitted under clause (i) and, as necessary, direct limited supplementation of the consolidated administrative record by the relevant Federal agency. (C) Closure.--After all objections to the consolidated administrative record are resolved under subparagraph (B)(iii)-- (i) the consolidated administrative record shall be considered final and closed; and (ii) the Commission shall issue a public written order indicating the consolidated administrative record is finalized and closed. (D) Final agency action.--The written order of the Commission under subparagraph (C)(ii) shall constitute a final agency action for the purposes of chapter 7 of title 5, United States Code, solely with respect to the contents and completeness of the consolidated administrative record. <all>\n\nSUMMARY TO EVALUATE:\nTitle: JOAN Act: Speeding Up Natural Gas Projects and Limiting Legal Delays\nSummary: This act aims to accelerate the approval of natural gas infrastructure by streamlining agency coordination and setting strict deadlines. It limits the ability of courts and state agencies to delay projects through environmental challenges and simplified water quality requirements.\nKey Points: FERC is designated as the sole lead agency for environmental reviews of natural gas projects., Agencies must issue final authorizations within 90 days after the environmental review is completed., State water quality certification requirements are simplified to prevent them from being used to block projects., Legal challenges against projects must be filed within a strict 60-day window., Courts are restricted from issuing long-term injunctions that halt construction during litigation., Plaintiffs must demonstrate a cumulative probability of success greater than 50% to obtain a preliminary injunction.\n\nZASADY OCENY:\n1. Sprawdź wszystkie LICZBY, DATY i KWOTY w SUMMARY. Jeśli którejś brakuje w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n2. Sprawdź wszystkie NAZWISKA, ORGANIZACJE i MIEJSCA w SUMMARY. Jeśli którejś brakuje w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n3. Sprawdź wszystkie konkretne DZIAŁANIA PRAWNE . Jeśli tego mechanizmu nie ma w SOURCE -> is_valid: false.\n\nWAŻNE: Abstrakcyjne pojęcia (np. \"transparentność\", \"zaufanie\") są dozwolone jako wnioski.\n\nOUTPUT (JSON):\n{\n  \"is_valid\": true/false,\n  \"issue\": \"fabricated_entity\" / \"contradiction\" / \"none\"\n}\n\nWYMAGANIA FORMATOWANIA:\n1. Odpowiedz WYŁĄCZNIE surowym obiektem JSON.\n2. NIE używaj bloków kodu Markdown.\n3. NIE dodawaj żadnych wstępów ani wyjaśnień przed ani po JSONie.\n4. JSON musi być poprawny i gotowy do parsowania.\n\n",
      "ai_response_raw": "{\n  \"is_valid\": true,\n  \"issue\": \"none\"\n}"
    },
    {
      "timestamp": "2026-04-29T11:15:18.185Z",
      "source_url": "https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/s4300/BILLS-119s4300is.htm",
      "model": "gemini-flash-latest",
      "prompt_sent": "\nJesteś ekspertem od prawa Stanów Zjednoczonych, który ma za zadanie analizować dokumenty ustaw, uchwał oraz innych dokumentów legislacyjnych, a następnie przygotowywać z nich informacje w przystępny sposób dla obywateli. Twoim celem jest przedstawienie informacji tak, aby obywatele mogli sami ocenić wpływ legislacji na ich życie, nawet bez posiadania specjalistycznej wiedzy legislacyjnej. Skup się na faktach i obiektywnych skutkach wprowadzanych zmian, unikając wartościowania i osobistych opinii. Wszelki żargon prawny jest zabroniony. Prezentuj informacje w jasny, zwięzły i angażujący sposób, tak aby były zrozumiałe dla osoby bez wykształcenia prawniczego. Unikaj długich, złożonych zdań. Zamiast pisać \"projekt ma na celu nowelizację kodeksu podatkowego...\", napisz \"Zmiany w podatkach: nowe ulgi i obowiązki dla...\". Kontynuuj swoją pracę, dopóki nie rozwiążesz swojego zadania. Jeśli nie masz pewności co do generowanej treści, przeanalizuj dokument ponownie – nie zgaduj. Rozplanuj dobrze swoje zadanie przed przystąpieniem do niego. W podsumowaniu i kluczowych punktach, jeśli to możliwe i uzasadnione, podkreśl, jakie konkretne korzyści lub skutki (pozytywne lub negatywne) wprowadza ustawa dla życia codziennego obywateli, ich praw i obowiązków, finansów osobistych, bezpieczeństwa i innych ważnych kwestii (np. kategorycznych zakazów i nakazów czy najważniejszych konkretnych alokacji finansowych i terytorialnych).\n\nTwoja odpowiedź MUSI być w formacie JSON - i zawierać następujące klucze.\nZanim zwrócisz odpowiedź, dokładnie zweryfikuj, czy cała struktura JSON jest w 100% poprawna, włącznie ze wszystkimi przecinkami, nawiasami klamrowymi, kwadratowymi oraz cudzysłowami. Błędny JSON jest nieakceptowalny i uniemożliwi przetworzenie Twojej pracy.\n\nPrzeanalizuj dokładnie poniższy tekst dokumentu prawnego. To jest treść, na podstawie której masz wygenerować podsumowanie i kluczowe punkty:\n--- POCZĄTEK DOKUMENTU ---\n[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [S. 4300 Introduced in Senate (IS)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session S. 4300 To promote interagency coordination for reviewing certain authorizations under the Natural Gas Act, and for other purposes. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES April 15 (legislative day, April 14), 2026 Mr. Cotton introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To promote interagency coordination for reviewing certain authorizations under the Natural Gas Act, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Jurisdictional Oversight and Adjudication for Natural Gas Act'' or the ``JOAN Act''. SEC. 2. PROMOTING INTERAGENCY COORDINATION FOR REVIEW OF NATURAL GAS INFRASTRUCTURE. (a) Definitions.--In this section: (1) Commission.--The term ``Commission'' means the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. (2) Federal authorization.--The term ``Federal authorization'' has the meaning given that term in section 15(a) of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717n(a)). (3) NEPA review.--The term ``NEPA review'' means the process of reviewing a proposed Federal action under section 102 of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332). (4) Project-related nepa review.--The term ``project- related NEPA review'' means any NEPA review required to be conducted with respect to the issuance of an authorization under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717b) or a certificate of public convenience and necessity under section 7 of such Act (15 U.S.C. 717f). (b) Commission NEPA Review Responsibilities.--In acting as the lead agency under section 15(b)(1) of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717n(b)(1)) for the purposes of complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) with respect to an authorization under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717b) or a certificate of public convenience and necessity under section 7 of such Act (15 U.S.C. 717f), the Commission shall, in accordance with this section and other applicable Federal law-- (1) be the only lead agency; (2) coordinate as early as practicable with each agency designated as a participating agency under subsection (d)(3) to ensure that the Commission develops information in conducting its project-related NEPA review that is reasonably required by the participating agency in considering an aspect of an application for a Federal authorization for which the agency is responsible; and (3) take such actions as are necessary and proper to facilitate the expeditious resolution of its project-related NEPA review. (c) Deference to Commission.--In making a decision with respect to a Federal authorization required with respect to an application for authorization under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717b) or a certificate of public convenience and necessity under section 7 of such Act (15 U.S.C. 717f), each agency shall give deference, to the maximum extent authorized by law, to the scope of the project-related NEPA review that the Commission determines to be appropriate. (d) Participating Agencies.-- (1) Identification.--The Commission shall identify, not later than 30 days after the Commission receives an application for an authorization under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717b) or a certificate of public convenience and necessity under section 7 of such Act (15 U.S.C. 717f), any Federal or State agency, local government, or Indian Tribe that may issue a Federal authorization or is required by Federal law to consult with the Commission in conjunction with the issuance of a Federal authorization required for such authorization or certificate. (2) Invitation.-- (A) In general.--Not later than 45 days after the Commission receives an application for an authorization under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717b) or a certificate of public convenience and necessity under section 7 of such Act (15 U.S.C. 717f), the Commission shall invite any agency identified under paragraph (1) to participate in the review process for the applicable Federal authorization. (B) Deadline.--An invitation issued under subparagraph (A) shall establish a deadline by which a response to the invitation shall be submitted to the Commission, which may be extended by the Commission for good cause. (3) Designation as participating agencies.--Not later than 60 days after the Commission receives an application for an authorization under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717b) or a certificate of public convenience and necessity under section 7 of such Act (15 U.S.C. 717f), the Commission shall designate an agency identified under paragraph (1) as a participating agency with respect to an application for authorization under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717b) or a certificate of public convenience and necessity under section 7 of such Act (15 U.S.C. 717f) unless the agency informs the Commission, in writing, by the deadline established pursuant to paragraph (2)(B), that the agency-- (A) has no jurisdiction or authority with respect to the applicable Federal authorization; (B) has no special expertise or information relevant to any project-related NEPA review; or (C) does not intend to submit comments for the record for the project-related NEPA review conducted by the Commission. (4) Effect of designation and non-designation.--Designation or non-designation of an agency as a participating agency under paragraph (3) with respect to an application for an authorization under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717b) or a certificate of public convenience and necessity under section 7 of such Act (15 U.S.C. 717f) may not serve as evidence of an incomplete record before a court. (e) Water Quality Impacts.-- (1) In general.--Notwithstanding section 401 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1341), an applicant for a Federal authorization shall not be required to provide a certification under such section with respect to the Federal authorization. (2) Coordination.--With respect to any NEPA review for a Federal authorization to conduct an activity that will directly result in a discharge into the navigable waters (within the meaning of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.)), the Commission shall identify as an agency under subsection (d)(1) the State in which the discharge originates or will originate, or, if appropriate, the interstate water pollution control agency having jurisdiction over the navigable waters at the point where the discharge originates or will originate. (3) Proposed conditions.--A State or interstate agency designated as a participating agency pursuant to paragraph (2) may propose to the Commission terms or conditions for inclusion in an authorization under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717b) or a certificate of public convenience and necessity under section 7 of such Act (15 U.S.C. 717f) that the State or interstate agency determines are necessary to ensure that any activity described in paragraph (2) conducted pursuant to such authorization or certification will comply with the applicable provisions of sections 301, 302, 303, 306, and 307 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1311, 1312, 1313, 1316, 1317). (4) Commission consideration of conditions.--The Commission may include a term or condition in an authorization under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717b) or a certificate of public convenience and necessity under section 7 of such Act (15 U.S.C. 717f) proposed by a State or interstate agency under paragraph (3) only if the Commission finds that the term or condition is necessary to ensure that any activity described in paragraph (2) conducted pursuant to such authorization or certification will comply with the applicable provisions of sections 301, 302, 303, 306, and 307 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1311, 1312, 1313, 1316, 1317). (f) Schedule.-- (1) Deadline for federal authorizations.--A deadline for a Federal authorization required with respect to an application for authorization under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717b) or a certificate of public convenience and necessity under section 7 of such Act (15 U.S.C. 717f) set by the Commission under section 15(c)(1) of such Act (15 U.S.C. 717n(c)(1)) shall be not later than 90 days after the Commission completes its project-related NEPA review, unless an applicable schedule is otherwise established by Federal law. (2) Concurrent reviews.--Each Federal and State agency-- (A) that may consider an application for a Federal authorization required with respect to an application for authorization under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717b) or a certificate of public convenience and necessity under section 7 of such Act (15 U.S.C. 717f) shall formulate and implement a plan for administrative, policy, and procedural mechanisms to enable the agency to ensure completion of Federal authorizations in compliance with schedules established by the Commission under section 15(c)(1) of such Act (15 U.S.C. 717n(c)(1)); and (B) in considering an aspect of an application for a Federal authorization required with respect to an application for authorization under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717b) or a certificate of public convenience and necessity under section 7 of such Act (15 U.S.C. 717f), shall-- (i) formulate and implement a plan to enable the agency to comply with the schedule established by the Commission under section 15(c)(1) of such Act (15 U.S.C. 717n(c)(1)); (ii) carry out the obligations of that agency under applicable law concurrently, and in conjunction with, the project-related NEPA review conducted by the Commission, and in compliance with the schedule established by the Commission under section 15(c)(1) (15 U.S.C. 717n(c)(1)) of such Act, unless the agency notifies the Commission in writing that doing so would impair the ability of the agency to conduct needed analysis or otherwise carry out such obligations; (iii) transmit to the Commission a statement-- (I) acknowledging receipt of the schedule established by the Commission under section 15(c)(1) of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717n(c)(1)); and (II) setting forth the plan formulated under clause (i) of this subparagraph; (iv) not later than 30 days after the agency receives such application for a Federal authorization, transmit to the applicant a notice-- (I) indicating whether such application is ready for processing; and (II) if such application is not ready for processing, that includes a comprehensive description of the information needed for the agency to determine that the application is ready for processing; (v) determine that such application for a Federal authorization is ready for processing for purposes of clause (iv) if such application is sufficiently complete for the purposes of commencing consideration, regardless of whether supplemental information is necessary to enable the agency to complete the consideration required by law with respect to such application; and (vi) not less often than once every 90 days, transmit to the Commission a report describing the progress made in considering such application for a Federal authorization. (3) Failure to meet deadline.--If a Federal or State agency, including the Commission, fails to meet a deadline for a Federal authorization set forth in the schedule established by the Commission under section 15(c)(1) of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717n(c)(1)), not later than 5 days after such deadline, the head of the relevant Federal agency (including, in the case of a failure by a State agency, the Federal agency overseeing the delegated authority) shall notify Congress and the Commission of such failure and set forth a recommended implementation plan to ensure completion of the action to which such deadline applied. (g) Consideration of Applications for Federal Authorization.-- (1) Issue identification and resolution.-- (A) Identification.--Federal and State agencies that may consider an aspect of an application for a Federal authorization shall identify, as early as possible, any issues of concern that may delay or prevent an agency from working with the Commission to resolve such issues and granting such authorization. (B) Issue resolution.--The Commission may forward any issue of concern identified under subparagraph (A) to the heads of the relevant agencies (including, in the case of an issue of concern that is a failure by a State agency, the Federal agency overseeing the delegated authority, if applicable) for resolution. (2) Remote surveys.-- (A) In general.--If a Federal or State agency considering an aspect of an application for a Federal authorization requires the person applying for such authorization to submit data, the agency shall consider any such data gathered by aerial or other remote means that the person submits. (B) Conditional approval.--The agency may grant a conditional approval for the Federal authorization based on data gathered by aerial or remote means, conditioned on the verification of such data by subsequent onsite inspection. (3) Application processing.--The Commission, and Federal and State agencies, may allow a person applying for a Federal authorization to fund a third-party contractor to assist in reviewing the application for such authorization. (h) Accountability, Transparency, Efficiency.--For an application for an authorization under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717b) or a certificate of public convenience and necessity under section 7 of such Act (15 U.S.C. 717f) that requires multiple Federal authorizations, the Commission, with input from any Federal or State agency considering an aspect of the application, shall track and make available to the public on the website of the Commission information related to the actions required to complete the Federal authorizations. Such information shall include the following: (1) The schedule established by the Commission under section 15(c)(1) of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717n(c)(1)). (2) A list of all the actions required by each applicable agency to complete permitting, reviews, and other actions necessary to obtain a final decision on the application. (3) The expected completion date for each such action. (4) A point of contact at the agency responsible for each such action. (5) In the event that an action is still pending as of the expected date of completion, a brief explanation of the reasons for the delay. SEC. 3. ACCELERATION OF CLAIMS. (a) Definitions.--In this section: (1) Civil action.--The term ``civil action'' means an initial claim challenging a core authorization for a covered project. (2) Commission.--The term ``Commission'' means the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. (3) Core authorization.--The term ``core authorization'' means a Federal authorization issued pursuant to section 3(e) or section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717b(e), 717f(c)). (4) Covered project.--The term ``covered project'' means a project requiring a core authorization. (5) Federal authorization.--The term ``Federal authorization'' means any license, permit, approval, finding, determination, or administrative decision issued by an agency, and any interagency consultation that is required or authorized under Federal law, to site, construct, reconstruct, abandon, or commence operations of a covered project administered by-- (A) a Federal agency; or (B) in the case of a State participating in or administering a review required or authorized under Federal law, as applicable, a State agency. (6) Project sponsor.--The term ``project sponsor'' means any person, including a State, Tribal, or local government entity, that-- (A) is an applicant for, or holder of, a core authorization or any other Federal authorization for a covered project; or (B) otherwise proposes to site, construct, reconstruct, own, or operate a covered project. (7) Related claim.--The term ``related claim'' means a claim challenging a Federal authorization that is joined to a civil action after that civil action has been filed. (b) Final Agency Action.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, issuance of a core authorization for a covered project shall be considered a final agency action for the purposes of chapter 7 of title 5, United States Code, with respect to all Federal authorizations required for that covered project. (c) Claims.-- (1) Sole and exclusive relief.-- (A) In general.--The filing and final adjudication of a civil action shall constitute the sole and exclusive means of judicial review and relief with respect to the applicable covered project and all Federal authorizations issued for that covered project. (B) Bar on subsequent actions.--After the final adjudication of a civil action, any subsequent cause of action or challenge, whether statutory, procedural, or substantive, related to or connected with the applicable covered project or any Federal authorization for that covered project brought by any party except the project sponsor shall be barred and dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. (2) Venue.-- (A) In general.--A civil action shall be filed exclusively in-- (i) the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit; or (ii) the court of appeals of the United States for the judicial circuit in which the principal place of business of the project sponsor for the applicable covered project is located. (B) Related claims.--After a civil action is filed in an applicable court described in subparagraph (A), all related claims arising out of the same nucleus of operative fact as that civil action shall be joined or consolidated to that court for adjudication. (3) Time to file.--A civil action and all related claims arising out of the same nucleus of operative fact shall be filed with the applicable court by the earlier of-- (A) the date that is 60 days after the core authorization is published in the Federal Register; and (B) the statutory deadline required for causes of action relating to that core authorization. (4) Judicial review.-- (A) In general.--Subject to subsection (d), the filing and final adjudication of a civil action shall constitute the only opportunity for judicial review of the applicable covered project and all Federal authorizations issued for that covered project. (B) Scope.--Judicial review of a civil action and any related claim arising out of the same nucleus of operative fact under this section-- (i) shall-- (I) be limited to the finalized consolidated record under subsection (g)(3)(C); and (II) be based exclusively on that finalized consolidated record; and (ii) shall not take evidence, permit discovery, receive testimony, or engage in fact-finding. (C) Preliminary injunctions.-- (i) Multiplicative merit standard.--In any civil action seeking a preliminary injunction or a temporary restraining order to halt a Federal action based on an alleged violation of this Act, the applicable court shall determine the likelihood of success on the merits by calculating the cumulative probability of success across all independent legal and jurisdictional requirements. (ii) Probabilistic calculation.--A court may not find a likelihood of success on the merits under clause (i) unless the product of the probabilities of success for each independent legal and jurisdictional requirement, including standing under article III of the Constitution of the United States, final agency action, and the merits of the underlying claim, exceeds 50 percent. (iii) Written findings.--The court under clause (ii) shall issue written findings of fact and conclusions of law specifying-- (I) the estimated probability of success assigned to each independent legal and jurisdictional requirement; and (II) the cumulative probability of success. (D) Deadline.--If the applicable court does not issue a final determination for a filed civil action and all related claims arising out of the same nucleus of operative fact by the date that is 180 days after the expiration of the applicable timeline described in paragraph (3), the core authorization and all associated Federal authorizations for the applicable covered project shall be considered approved and not subject to further review. (E) Identification of factual determinations.--For the purposes of judicial review, the statements of material fact submitted under subsection (g)(2) shall not constitute independent evidence or a freestanding factual determination apart from the cited administrative record material. (5) Relief.-- (A) In general.--In reviewing a civil action, the applicable court may not-- (i) issue an injunction lasting for a period exceeding 60 days; (ii) enjoin any covered project activity unrelated to a specific issue identified by the court; or (iii) grant permanent injunctive relief unless the plaintiff demonstrates by clear and convincing evidence that-- (I) the plaintiff has suffered an irreparable injury; (II) remedies available at law, including monetary damages, are inadequate to compensate for the irreparable injury; (III) considering the balance of hardships between the plaintiff and defendant, a remedy in equity is warranted; and (IV) the public interest would not be disserved by a permanent injunction. (B) Permanent injunction.--Any permanent injunction issued by a court pursuant to this subsection shall be supported by a finding, by clear and convincing evidence, of extraordinary circumstances, and shall be as narrowly tailored as possible to correct the injury and the least intrusive means necessary to correct the injury. (C) Security for injunctive relief.--Any court issuing a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction in a civil action under this section shall require the movant to provide security in an amount that the court considers proper to pay the costs and damages sustained by any party found to have been wrongfully enjoined or restrained, consistent with rule 65(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (6) No remand with vacatur.--In reviewing a civil action, the applicable court may not issue a remedy of remand with vacatur. (7) Project segmentation.--After the filing of a civil action, the project sponsor for the implicated covered project may continue construction for any part of the covered project that is unaffected by the civil action. (8) Prohibited civil actions.--A civil action may not be filed by any party that did not raise the issue giving rise to that civil action during the notice and comment period for the applicable Federal authorization. (d) Project Sponsor Exception.-- (1) In general.--Notwithstanding subsection (c), a project sponsor may bring a separate claim challenging a Federal authorization for an applicable covered project regardless of whether a civil action concerning that Federal authorization has been filed and adjudicated, subject to the condition that the specific underlying issue of that separate claim has not previously been finally adjudicated. (2) No related claims.--A claim described in paragraph (1) may not be joined by a related claim or any other claim arising out of the same nucleus of operative fact. (e) Effect on Substantive Standards.--Nothing in this section alters substantive environmental requirements or reduces opportunities for public comment under applicable Federal law. (f) Multiple Core Authorizations.--If more than 1 Federal agency issues a core authorization for a covered project, the Commission shall be the lead agency for purposes of an environmental review for the covered project under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), if applicable. (g) Statement of Material Facts and Technical Findings.-- (1) Definition of statement of material fact.--In this subsection, the term ``statement of material fact'' means a citation index identifying, by specific record citation, the portions of the administrative record that set forth the material factual determinations and technical conclusions relied on in a Federal authorization for a covered project. (2) Transmission.--Not later than 60 days after the date of publication of a core authorization in the Federal Register, each Federal agency that issued, or is required to issue, a Federal authorization for the applicable covered project shall submit to the Commission-- (A) the administrative record for that Federal authorization; and (B) a statement of material fact and technical conclusions that identifies, by specific citation to the administrative record, the portions of the record containing the material factual determinations and technical conclusions relied on by the Federal agency. (3) Consolidated administrative record.-- (A) Consolidate and publish.--Not later than 90 days after the date of publication of a core authorization in the Federal Register, the Commission shall-- (i) consolidate the submissions under paragraph (2) (referred to in this subsection as the ``consolidated administrative record''); and (ii) publish a notice of availability of the consolidated administrative record. (B) Objections.-- (i) In general.--Not later than 30 days after the date of publication of the notice under subparagraph (A), any party may submit to the Commission a written objection limited to whether the consolidated administrative record omits materials-- (I) that were before the Federal agency; and (II) that were directly or indirectly considered in issuing a Federal authorization. (ii) No merits.--An objection to the consolidated administrative record submitted under clause (i) may not-- (I) raise merit arguments; or (II) seek discovery, testimony, or new evidence. (iii) Resolution.--Not later than 60 days after the date of publication of the notice under subparagraph (A), the Commission shall resolve each objection to the consolidated administrative record submitted under clause (i) and, as necessary, direct limited supplementation of the consolidated administrative record by the relevant Federal agency. (C) Closure.--After all objections to the consolidated administrative record are resolved under subparagraph (B)(iii)-- (i) the consolidated administrative record shall be considered final and closed; and (ii) the Commission shall issue a public written order indicating the consolidated administrative record is finalized and closed. (D) Final agency action.--The written order of the Commission under subparagraph (C)(ii) shall constitute a final agency action for the purposes of chapter 7 of title 5, United States Code, solely with respect to the contents and completeness of the consolidated administrative record. <all>\n--- KONIEC DOKUMENTU ---\n\nPAMIĘTAJ: Twoja odpowiedź MUSI być wyłącznie poprawnym obiektem JSON. Nie dodawaj żadnych dodatkowych znaków, komentarzy ani tekstu przed znacznikiem '{' ani po znaczniku '}'. Cała odpowiedź musi być parsowalna jako JSON.\nNa podstawie POWYŻSZEGO dokumentu, wypełnij poniższą strukturę JSON:\nOto struktura JSON, której oczekuję (wypełnij ją treścią):\n{\n  \"pl_ai_title\": \"Nowy, krótki tytuł dla aktu prawnego po polsku, oddający sedno wprowadzanych zmian (np. maksymalnie 10-12 słów).\",\n  \"pl_summary\": \"2-3 zdania zwięzłego podsumowania treści aktu prawnego po polsku, napisane z perspektywy wpływu na życie codzienne obywateli.\",\n  \"pl_key_points\": [\n    \"Pierwszy krótki punkt po polsku dotyczący najważniejszych wprowadzanych rozwiązań lub zmian.\",\n    \"Drugi krótki punkt po polsku...\"\n  ],\n  \"eng_ai_title\": \"A new, short title for the legal act in English, capturing the essence of the changes (e.g., max 10-12 words).\",\n  \"eng_summary\": \"2-3 sentences summarizing the legal act in English, from the perspective of its impact on citizens' daily lives.\",\n  \"eng_key_points\": [\n    \"First short bullet point in English regarding the most important solutions or changes being introduced.\",\n    \"Second short bullet point in English...\"\n  ],\n  \"de_ai_title\": \"Ein neuer, kurzer Titel für das Rechtsdokument auf Deutsch, der den Kern der Änderungen erfasst (z.B. max. 10-12 Wörter).\",\n  \"de_summary\": \"2-3 Sätze Zusammenfassung des Rechtsdokuments auf Deutsch, aus der Perspektive seiner Auswirkungen auf das tägliche Leben der Bürger.\",\n  \"de_key_points\": [\n    \"Erster kurzer Stichpunkt auf Deutsch zu den wichtigsten eingeführten Lösungen oder Änderungen.\",\n    \"Zweiter kurzer Stichpunkt auf Deutsch...\"\n  ],\n  \"fr_ai_title\": \"Un nouveau titre court pour l'acte juridique en français, saisissant l'essence des changements (par exemple, 10-12 mots maximum).\",\n  \"fr_summary\": \"Résumé de 2-3 phrases de l'acte juridique en français, du point de vue de son impact sur la vie quotidienne des citoyens.\",\n  \"fr_key_points\": [\n    \"Premier court point en français concernant les solutions ou changements les plus importants introduits.\",\n    \"Deuxième court point en français...\"\n  ],\n  \"es_ai_title\": \"Un nuevo título breve para el acto jurídico en español, que recoja la esencia de los cambios (por ejemplo, máximo 10-12 palabras).\",\n  \"es_summary\": \"Resumen de 2-3 frases del acto jurídico en español, desde la perspectiva de su impacto en la vida cotidiana de los ciudadanos.\",\n  \"es_key_points\": [\n    \"Primer punto breve en español sobre las soluciones o cambios más importantes que se introducen.\",\n    \"Segundo punto breve en español...\"\n  ],\n  \"it_ai_title\": \"Un nuovo titolo breve per l'atto giuridico in italiano, che colga l'essenza delle modifiche (ad es. massimo 10-12 parole).\",\n  \"it_summary\": \"Riepilogo di 2-3 frasi dell'atto giuridico in italiano, dal punto di vista del suo impatto sulla vita quotidiana dei cittadini.\",\n  \"it_key_points\": [\n    \"Primo breve punto in italiano riguardante le soluzioni o le modifiche più importanti introdotte.\",\n    \"Secondo breve punto in italiano...\"\n  ],\n  \"nl_ai_title\": \"Een nieuwe, korte titel voor de rechtshandeling in het Nederlands, die de essentie van de wijzigingen weergeeft (bijv. max. 10-12 woorden).\",\n  \"nl_summary\": \"Samenvatting van 2-3 zinnen van de rechtshandeling in het Nederlands, vanuit het perspectief van de impact op het dagelijks leven van burgers.\",\n  \"nl_key_points\": [\n    \"Eerste korte punt in het Nederlands betreffende de belangrijkste geïntroduceerde oplossingen of wijzigingen.\",\n    \"Tweede korte punt in het Nederlands...\"\n  ],\n  \"pt_ai_title\": \"Um novo título curto para o ato jurídico em português, capturando a essência das mudanças (por exemplo, máx. 10-12 palavras).\",\n  \"pt_summary\": \"Resumo de 2-3 frases do ato jurídico em português, na perspetiva do seu impacto na vida quotidiana dos cidadãos.\",\n  \"pt_key_points\": [\n    \"Primeiro ponto curto em português sobre as soluções ou alterações mais importantes introduzidas.\",\n    \"Segundo ponto curto em português...\"\n  ],\n  \"category\": [\"Categorize the document into one category by default, based on the field it primarily concerns. Choose up to 3 if the document also touches upon SIGNIFICANT issues from other categories. You MUST select categories ONLY from the following list: Health, Education, Family, Taxes, Labor, Security, Environment, Courts and Law, Transport, Benefits, Real Estate, Media and Culture, Local Government, Migration, Agriculture, Public Investments, Informatization, Economy. If the document does not definitively fit any of these, you MUST use \"Other\". If you use \"Other\", it should be the ONLY category selected. Do NOT invent new categories. The response must be an array of strings, e.g., [\"Taxes\", \"Family\"].\"]\n}\n\n",
      "ai_response_raw": "{\n  \"pl_ai_title\": \"Ustawa JOAN: Przyspieszenie budowy rurociągów gazowych i ograniczenie blokad prawnych\",\n  \"pl_summary\": \"Ustawa ma na celu przyspieszenie zatwierdzania projektów infrastruktury gazu ziemnego poprzez usprawnienie współpracy między urzędami i narzucenie sztywnych terminów. Ogranicza ona możliwości blokowania inwestycji w sądach oraz upraszcza wymogi dotyczące ochrony wód, co ma ułatwić rozwój sektora energetycznego.\",\n  \"pl_key_points\": [\n    \"Komisja FERC staje się jedynym głównym urzędem odpowiedzialnym za oceny środowiskowe projektów gazowych.\",\n    \"Wprowadzono 90-dniowy termin na wydanie ostatecznych decyzji przez urzędy po zakończeniu przeglądu środowiskowego.\",\n    \"Zniesiono obowiązek uzyskiwania stanowych certyfikatów jakości wody, które dotychczas mogły wstrzymywać budowę.\",\n    \"Skrócono czas na zaskarżenie inwestycji do sądu do 60 dni od momentu wydania zgody.\",\n    \"Sądy nie będą mogły łatwo wstrzymywać budowy całego projektu podczas trwania procesu, jeśli dotyczy on tylko jego części.\",\n    \"Wprowadzono surowe wymogi dla osób chcących zablokować projekt – muszą one udowodnić ponad 50% szans na wygraną przed sądem.\"\n  ],\n  \"eng_ai_title\": \"JOAN Act: Speeding Up Natural Gas Projects and Limiting Legal Delays\",\n  \"eng_summary\": \"This act aims to accelerate the approval of natural gas infrastructure by streamlining agency coordination and setting strict deadlines. It limits the ability of courts and state agencies to delay projects through environmental challenges and simplified water quality requirements.\",\n  \"eng_key_points\": [\n    \"FERC is designated as the sole lead agency for environmental reviews of natural gas projects.\",\n    \"Agencies must issue final authorizations within 90 days after the environmental review is completed.\",\n    \"State water quality certification requirements are simplified to prevent them from being used to block projects.\",\n    \"Legal challenges against projects must be filed within a strict 60-day window.\",\n    \"Courts are restricted from issuing long-term injunctions that halt construction during litigation.\",\n    \"Plaintiffs must demonstrate a cumulative probability of success greater than 50% to obtain a preliminary injunction.\"\n  ],\n  \"de_ai_title\": \"JOAN-Gesetz: Beschleunigung von Erdgasprojekten und Begrenzung rechtlicher Verzögerungen\",\n  \"de_summary\": \"Dieses Gesetz zielt darauf ab, die Genehmigung von Erdgasinfrastrukturen durch eine bessere Koordination der Behörden und strikte Fristen zu beschleunigen. Es schränkt die Möglichkeiten ein, Projekte durch langwierige Gerichtsverfahren oder Umweltauflagen zu verzögern.\",\n  \"de_key_points\": [\n    \"Die FERC wird zur alleinigen federführenden Behörde für Umweltprüfungen bei Gasprojekten ernannt.\",\n    \"Behörden müssen Entscheidungen innerhalb von 90 Tagen nach Abschluss der Umweltprüfung treffen.\",\n    \"Anforderungen an Wasserqualitätszertifikate werden vereinfacht, um Projektblockaden zu verhindern.\",\n    \"Klagen gegen Projekte müssen innerhalb einer strengen Frist von 60 Tagen eingereicht werden.\",\n    \"Gerichte können Bauarbeiten während eines Prozesses nur unter sehr strengen Bedingungen und zeitlich begrenzt stoppen.\",\n    \"Bauarbeiten an nicht betroffenen Teilen eines Projekts dürfen trotz laufender Klage fortgesetzt werden.\"\n  ],\n  \"fr_ai_title\": \"Loi JOAN : Accélération des projets de gaz naturel et limitation des recours juridiques\",\n  \"fr_summary\": \"Cette loi vise à accélérer l'approbation des infrastructures de gaz naturel en simplifiant la coordination entre les agences et en imposant des délais stricts. Elle limite la capacité des tribunaux et des États à retarder les projets pour des motifs environnementaux.\",\n  \"fr_key_points\": [\n    \"La FERC devient l'unique agence responsable des évaluations environnementales des projets gaziers.\",\n    \"Des délais de 90 jours sont imposés aux agences pour rendre leurs décisions finales après examen.\",\n    \"Les exigences de certification de la qualité de l'eau par les États sont assouplies pour éviter les blocages.\",\n    \"Les recours en justice doivent être déposés dans un délai maximum de 60 jours après l'autorisation.\",\n    \"Les tribunaux ne peuvent plus suspendre l'intégralité d'un projet si le litige ne concerne qu'une partie spécifique.\",\n    \"La construction peut se poursuivre sur les segments du projet non concernés par une action en justice.\"\n  ],\n  \"es_ai_title\": \"Ley JOAN: Aceleración de proyectos de gas natural y limitación de retrasos legales\",\n  \"es_summary\": \"Esta ley busca agilizar la aprobación de infraestructuras de gas natural mediante la coordinación de agencias y el establecimiento de plazos estrictos. Reduce la capacidad de frenar proyectos a través de demandas judiciales o requisitos ambientales estatales.\",\n  \"es_key_points\": [\n    \"La FERC será la única agencia líder en las revisiones ambientales de proyectos de gas natural.\",\n    \"Se establecen plazos de 90 días para que las agencias emitan autorizaciones finales tras las revisiones.\",\n    \"Se simplifican los requisitos de certificación de calidad del agua para evitar bloqueos administrativos.\",\n    \"Las demandas legales deben presentarse en un plazo máximo de 60 días tras la aprobación del proyecto.\",\n    \"Se limita la capacidad de los tribunales para detener obras mediante medidas cautelares prolongadas.\",\n    \"Solo las partes que participaron en el periodo de comentarios públicos pueden presentar demandas.\"\n  ],\n  \"it_ai_title\": \"Legge JOAN: Accelerazione dei progetti di gas naturale e riduzione dei ritardi legali\",\n  \"it_summary\": \"Questa legge mira a velocizzare l'approvazione delle infrastrutture per il gas naturale semplificando il coordinamento tra gli uffici e fissando scadenze rigorose. Limita la possibilità di bloccare i progetti tramite ricorsi giudiziari o vincoli ambientali statali.\",\n  \"it_key_points\": [\n    \"La FERC diventa l'unica agenzia capofila per le valutazioni ambientali dei progetti di gas.\",\n    \"Le agenzie devono emettere le autorizzazioni finali entro 90 giorni dalla fine dei controlli ambientali.\",\n    \"Vengono semplificati i requisiti per le certificazioni sulla qualità dell'acqua per prevenire ostruzionismi.\",\n    \"I ricorsi legali devono essere presentati entro 60 giorni dalla pubblicazione dell'autorizzazione.\",\n    \"I tribunali non possono sospendere i lavori per più di 60 giorni senza prove straordinarie.\",\n    \"La costruzione può proseguire nelle aree del progetto non direttamente interessate dalla causa legale.\"\n  ],\n  \"nl_ai_title\": \"JOAN-wet: Versnelling van aardgasprojecten en beperking van juridische vertragingen\",\n  \"nl_summary\": \"Deze wet is bedoeld om de goedkeuring van aardgasinfrastructuur te versnellen door de coördinatie tussen instanties te verbeteren en strikte deadlines in te stellen. Het beperkt de mogelijkheden om projecten via de rechter of milieueisen te vertragen.\",\n  \"nl_key_points\": [\n    \"De FERC wordt de enige leidende instantie voor milieubeoordelingen van gasprojecten.\",\n    \"Instanties moeten binnen 90 dagen na de milieubeoordeling een definitief besluit nemen.\",\n    \"Eisen voor waterkwaliteitscertificaten worden vereenvoudigd om administratieve blokkades te voorkomen.\",\n    \"Juridische stappen tegen een project moeten binnen een strikte termijn van 60 dagen worden ondernomen.\",\n    \"Rechters kunnen de bouw van een project minder makkelijk stilleggen tijdens een lopende rechtszaak.\",\n    \"De bouw van niet-betwiste delen van een project mag tijdens de juridische procedure gewoon doorgaan.\"\n  ],\n  \"pt_ai_title\": \"Lei JOAN: Aceleração de projetos de gás natural e limitação de atrasos judiciais\",\n  \"pt_summary\": \"Esta lei visa agilizar a aprovação de infraestruturas de gás natural, melhorando a coordenação entre agências e estabelecendo prazos rigorosos. Limita a capacidade de interromper projetos através de processos judiciais ou exigências ambientais estaduais.\",\n  \"pt_key_points\": [\n    \"A FERC passa a ser a única agência líder nas avaliações ambientais de projetos de gás natural.\",\n    \"As agências têm um prazo de 90 dias para emitir autorizações finais após a conclusão das revisões.\",\n    \"Os requisitos de certificação da qualidade da água são simplificados para evitar o bloqueio de projetos.\",\n    \"As ações judiciais devem ser apresentadas no prazo de 60 dias após a publicação da autorização.\",\n    \"Os tribunais enfrentam critérios muito mais rigorosos para suspender obras temporariamente.\",\n    \"A construção pode continuar em partes do projeto que não sejam afetadas diretamente pela ação judicial.\"\n  ],\n  \"category\": [\"Economy\", \"Environment\", \"Courts and Law\"]\n}"
    }
  ]
}