| Metric | Q4 '24 | Q1 '25 | Q2 '25 | Q3 '25 | Q4 '25 | Q1 '26 | Q2 '26 | Q3 '26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $14.1B | $14.9B | $15.0B | $16.0B | $18.0B | $19.3B | $22.2B | $29.6B |
| Rev Growth (YoY) | 51.2% | 24.7% | 20.2% | 22.0% | 28.2% | 29.5% | 47.9% | ▲ 85.5% |
| Gross Margin | 64.1% | 68.0% | 68.0% | 67.1% | 68.0% | 65.6% | 67.2% | ▲ 69.1% |
| Operating Margin | 32.9% | 42.0% | 38.8% | 36.9% | 41.7% | 45.0% | 49.0% | ▲ 53.9% |
| EV/Sales | 60.3x | 72.4x | 66.8x | 91.3x | 97.9x | 84.0x | 91.2x | 64.4x |
Broadcom delivered a blowout quarter with AI semiconductor revenue tripling year-over-year to $16.7 billion, and management's posture was one of barely contained confidence bordering on triumphalism, with Hock Tan repeatedly framing the company's XPU momentum as a structural, multi-year displacement of GPU incumbents. The dominant theme was the articulation of an extraordinary forward revenue ramp—$115 billion in AI revenue for fiscal 2027 and $230 billion for fiscal 2028—numbers so large they reframed the competitive landscape entirely. Analysts were largely in validation mode, probing supply constraints and financing structures rather than questioning the demand thesis, signaling broad buy-side acceptance of Broadcom's AI narrative. The call was notable for the specificity of customer-level gigawatt disclosures and the explicit performance comparisons positioning XPUs as superior to NVIDIA's Vera Rubin and Grace Blackwell Ultra for inference workloads.