| Metric | Q2 '24 | Q3 '24 | Q4 '24 | Q1 '25 | Q2 '25 | Q3 '25 | Q4 '25 | Q1 '26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $39.1B | $40.6B | $48.4B | $42.3B | $47.5B | $51.2B | $59.9B | $56.3B |
| Rev Growth (YoY) | 22.1% | 18.9% | 20.6% | 16.1% | 21.6% | 26.2% | 23.8% | ▲ 33.1% |
| Gross Margin | 81.3% | 81.8% | 81.7% | 82.1% | 82.1% | 82.0% | 81.8% | ▲ 81.9% |
| Operating Margin | 38.0% | 42.7% | 48.3% | 41.5% | 43.0% | 40.1% | 41.3% | ▼ 40.6% |
| EV/Sales | 32.9x | 35.8x | 30.8x | 34.9x | 39.9x | 36.9x | 28.6x | 26.9x |
Meta's Q1 2026 call was defined by an aggressive, confident posture on AI infrastructure and model development, with management projecting conviction that their vertical integration strategy—from frontier models to consumer agents—is the right long-term bet. Zuckerberg was notably philosophical and differentiated in framing Meta's AI vision around individual empowerment rather than enterprise automation, positioning the company as uniquely consumer-oriented among frontier labs. Analyst questions were heavily focused on ROIC justification for the massive CapEx ramp, and management largely deflected with qualitative milestones rather than financial guardrails, which reflects both the early stage of monetization and the scale of the bet being made. The CapEx guide increase to $125–145 billion for 2026, driven partly by higher memory component costs, was the single most concrete signal of infrastructure demand acceleration. Overall tone was bullish and expansive, with Susan Li acknowledging that Meta has consistently underestimated its own compute needs even as it has been aggressively ramping.