| Metric | Q3 '24 | Q4 '24 | Q1 '25 | Q2 '25 | Q3 '25 | Q4 '25 | Q1 '26 | Q2 '26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $61.9B | $64.7B | $65.6B | $69.6B | $70.1B | $76.4B | $77.7B | $81.3B |
| Rev Growth (YoY) | 17.0% | 15.2% | 16.0% | 12.3% | 13.3% | 18.1% | 18.4% | ▼ 16.7% |
| Gross Margin | 70.1% | 69.6% | 69.4% | 68.7% | 68.7% | 68.6% | 69.0% | ▼ 68.0% |
| Operating Margin | 44.6% | 43.1% | 46.6% | 45.5% | 45.7% | 44.9% | 48.9% | ▼ 47.1% |
| EV/Sales | 52.4x | 53.7x | 49.9x | 46.2x | 40.9x | 49.4x | 50.7x | 45.4x |
Microsoft's FQ4 2025 call was a triumphant, confidence-saturated affair with management projecting expansive ambition rather than defensive caution — Azure grew 39% and beat significantly, commercial bookings crossed $100 billion for the first time, and Satya Nadella framed the AI infrastructure buildout as a multi-decade compounding platform play rather than a cyclical spend. Analyst tone was uniformly celebratory, with multiple analysts calling it the best quarter they had seen in years of coverage, and management used that goodwill to double down on aggressive CapEx guidance — over $30 billion in Q1 FY26 — without apology. The dominant theme was that AI demand is outpacing supply, that Microsoft remains capacity-constrained through at least H1 FY26, and that the software optimization layer (not just hardware) is the key differentiator. Amy Hood explicitly pushed back on attempts to identify a CapEx-to-revenue crossover point, signaling that Microsoft sees no reason to slow infrastructure investment given $368 billion in contracted backlog.