| Metric | Q3 '24 | Q4 '24 | Q1 '25 | Q2 '25 | Q3 '25 | Q4 '25 | Q1 '26 | Q2 '26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $0.0B | $0.0B | $0.1B | $0.1B | $0.1B | $0.2B | $0.4B | $0.6B |
| Rev Growth (YoY) | 766.0% | 465.7% | 389.5% | 769.7% | 237.4% | 500.8% | 621.5% | ▼ 454.0% |
| Gross Margin | 56.4% | 27.4% | 46.7% | 71.4% | 70.6% | 69.9% | 20.9% | ▲ 77.1% |
| Operating Margin | -200.9% | -393.9% | -234.2% | -105.8% | -89.1% | -103.0% | -32.1% | ▲ -30.2% |
| EV/Sales | 80.4x | 109.2x | 68.1x | 122.0x | 192.0x | 94.3x | 67.9x | 136.3x |
Nebius delivered a blowout Q2 with 454% revenue growth and a rapid acceleration in deal quality, signaling that the independent AI cloud market is entering a new pricing regime that management is deliberately exploiting by withholding capacity from long-term contracts. The tone from Arkady and the commercial team was unusually confident and strategic, framing Nebius not as a GPU reseller but as a full-stack platform company with pricing power, auction capability, and an asset-light model that could scale without proportional balance sheet risk. Analysts from Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, Citi, and Baird all probed the sustainability of the capacity and pricing ramp, and management's answers were consistently bullish and specific, citing $40M-$50M per megawatt short-term deals, a capacity auction clearing 15% above prior highs, and $40 billion in contracted backlog. The dominant theme was optionality: Nebius is deliberately not selling out 2027 capacity because it believes prices will continue to rise, a posture that implies strong conviction in sustained AI infrastructure demand. The call functioned less as a backward-looking earnings report and more as a forward-looking investor pitch for 2027 and beyond.