| Metric | Q2 '24 | Q3 '24 | Q4 '24 | Q1 '25 | Q2 '25 | Q3 '25 | Q4 '25 | Q1 '26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.6B | $2.8B | $3.0B | $3.1B | $3.2B | $3.4B | $3.6B | $3.8B |
| Rev Growth (YoY) | 22.2% | 22.2% | 21.3% | 18.6% | 22.4% | 21.8% | 20.7% | ▲ 22.1% |
| Gross Margin | 79.0% | 79.1% | 78.7% | 78.9% | 77.5% | 77.3% | 76.6% | ▼ 75.1% |
| Operating Margin | 9.1% | 14.9% | 12.6% | 14.6% | 11.1% | 16.8% | 12.4% | ▲ 13.3% |
| EV/Sales | 61.8x | 66.1x | 73.8x | 53.0x | 66.0x | 56.1x | 44.5x | 28.6x |
ServiceNow's Q1 2026 call was marked by confident, almost defiant management posture—McDermott repeatedly challenged skeptics to 'trust what you see' while delivering a beat-and-raise quarter—but the stock fell 12% after hours, revealing a meaningful gap between management's bullish narrative and investor skepticism about organic AI revenue acceleration. The dominant theme was ServiceNow positioning itself as the 'AI control tower' and governance layer for the entire enterprise AI ecosystem, explicitly welcoming foundation model companies and hyperscalers as partners whose spend flows through ServiceNow's platform. Analysts pressed hard on whether the AI revenue ramp is real and when it will show up in organic revisions, with Gina Mastantuono defending the guide as prudent while teasing a long-range plan at the May 4 Financial Analyst Day. The call functioned partly as a pre-FAD setup, with management deliberately holding back key disclosures—McDermott even admitted leaking the $1.5B AI revenue figure early as a concession to investor anxiety.