| Metric | Q3 '24 | Q4 '24 | Q1 '25 | Q2 '25 | Q3 '25 | Q4 '25 | Q1 '26 | Q2 '26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.8B | $3.0B | $3.1B | $3.2B | $3.4B | $3.6B | $3.8B | $4.0B |
| Rev Growth (YoY) | 22.2% | 21.3% | 18.6% | 22.4% | 21.8% | 20.7% | 22.1% | ▲ 24.0% |
| Gross Margin | 79.1% | 78.7% | 78.9% | 77.5% | 77.3% | 76.6% | 75.1% | ▼ 70.7% |
| Operating Margin | 14.9% | 12.6% | 14.6% | 11.1% | 16.8% | 12.4% | 13.3% | ▼ 4.1% |
| EV/Sales | 66.1x | 73.8x | 53.0x | 66.0x | 56.1x | 44.5x | 28.6x | 27.2x |
ServiceNow's Q2 2026 call was defined by a confident, almost triumphalist management posture, with CEO Bill McDermott repeatedly invoking the phrase 'we are who we said we were' to signal that AI monetization has moved from promise to proof. The dominant theme was the convergence of AI workflow orchestration and cybersecurity, with management positioning ServiceNow as the indispensable governance and control layer sitting above all AI infrastructure, models, and agents regardless of which chip or lab wins. Analysts were broadly constructive, with questions probing the durability of AI pricing, deal cycle health, and gross margin pressure rather than expressing skepticism about demand. The tone was notably bullish on agentic AI adoption inflecting now, not in the future, with concrete metrics backing the claim. The only friction came from modest full-year guidance raises relative to the Q2 beat, which management attributed to on-prem timing pull-forward and deliberate conservatism.