Coverage Report

Created: 2026-10-28 06:40

next uncovered line (L), next uncovered region (R), next uncovered branch (B)
/rust/registry/src/index.crates.io-1949cf8c6b5b557f/sofars-0.6.2/src/pnp/c2t00b.rs
Line
Count
Source
1
use crate::erst::era00;
2
use crate::pnp::{c2i00b, c2tcio, pom00};
3
4
///  Form the celestial to terrestrial matrix given the date, the UT1 and
5
///  the polar motion, using the IAU 2000B precession-nutation model.
6
///
7
///  Given:
8
///     tta,ttb  f64          TT as a 2-part Julian Date (Note 1)
9
///     uta,utb  f64          UT1 as a 2-part Julian Date (Note 1)
10
///     xp,yp    f64          coordinates of the pole (radians, Note 2)
11
///
12
///  Returned (function value):
13
///                 [[f64; 3]; 3]   celestial-to-terrestrial matrix (Note 3)
14
///
15
///  Notes:
16
///
17
///  1) The TT and UT1 dates tta+ttb and uta+utb are Julian Dates,
18
///     apportioned in any convenient way between the arguments uta and
19
///     utb.  For example, JD(UT1)=2450123.7 could be expressed in any of
20
///     these ways, among others:
21
///
22
///     ```text
23
///             uta            utb
24
///
25
///         2450123.7           0.0       (JD method)
26
///         2451545.0       -1421.3       (J2000 method)
27
///         2400000.5       50123.2       (MJD method)
28
///         2450123.5           0.2       (date & time method)
29
///     ```
30
///
31
///     The JD method is the most natural and convenient to use in
32
///     cases where the loss of several decimal digits of resolution is
33
///     acceptable.  The J2000 and MJD methods are good compromises
34
///     between resolution and convenience.  In the case of uta,utb, the
35
///     date & time method is best matched to the Earth rotation angle
36
///     algorithm used:  maximum precision is delivered when the uta
37
///     argument is for 0hrs UT1 on the day in question and the utb
38
///     argument lies in the range 0 to 1, or vice versa.
39
///
40
///  2) The arguments xp and yp are the coordinates (in radians) of the
41
///     Celestial Intermediate Pole with respect to the International
42
///     Terrestrial Reference System (see IERS Conventions 2003),
43
///     measured along the meridians 0 and 90 deg west respectively.
44
///
45
///  3) The matrix rc2t transforms from celestial to terrestrial
46
///     coordinates:
47
///
48
///        [TRS] = RPOM * R_3(ERA) * RC2I * [CRS]
49
///
50
///        ```text
51
///              = rc2t * [CRS]
52
///        ```
53
///
54
///     where [CRS] is a vector in the Geocentric Celestial Reference
55
///     System and [TRS] is a vector in the International Terrestrial
56
///     Reference System (see IERS Conventions 2003), RC2I is the
57
///     celestial-to-intermediate matrix, ERA is the Earth rotation
58
///     angle and RPOM is the polar motion matrix.
59
///
60
///  4) The present function is faster, but slightly less accurate (about
61
///     1 mas), than the iauC2t00a function.
62
///
63
///  Called:
64
///     iauC2i00b    celestial-to-intermediate matrix, IAU 2000B
65
///     iauEra00     Earth rotation angle, IAU 2000
66
///     iauPom00     polar motion matrix
67
///     iauC2tcio    form CIO-based celestial-to-terrestrial matrix
68
///
69
///  Reference:
70
///
71
///     McCarthy, D. D., Petit, G. (eds.), IERS Conventions (2003),
72
///     IERS Technical Note No. 32, BKG (2004)
73
0
pub fn c2t00b(tta: f64, ttb: f64, uta: f64, utb: f64, xp: f64, yp: f64) -> [[f64; 3]; 3] {
74
    /* Form the celestial-to-intermediate matrix for this TT (IAU 2000B). */
75
0
    let rc2i = c2i00b(tta, ttb);
76
77
    /* Predict the Earth rotation angle for this UT1. */
78
0
    let era = era00(uta, utb);
79
80
    /* Form the polar motion matrix (neglecting s'). */
81
0
    let rpom = pom00(xp, yp, 0.0);
82
83
    /* Combine to form the celestial-to-terrestrial matrix. */
84
0
    c2tcio(&rc2i, era, &rpom)
85
0
}