Coverage Report

Created: 2026-10-28 06:40

next uncovered line (L), next uncovered region (R), next uncovered branch (B)
/rust/registry/src/index.crates.io-1949cf8c6b5b557f/sofars-0.6.2/src/pnp/pn00.rs
Line
Count
Source
1
use crate::vm::rxr;
2
3
use super::{bp00, numat, obl80, pr00};
4
5
///  Bias/precession/nutation results, IAU 2000
6
///
7
///  Precession-nutation, IAU 2000 model:  a multi-purpose function,
8
///  supporting classical (equinox-based) use directly and CIO-based
9
///  use indirectly.
10
///
11
///  This function is part of the International Astronomical Union's
12
///  SOFA (Standards of Fundamental Astronomy) software collection.
13
///
14
///  Status:  support function.
15
///
16
///  Given:
17
///     date1,date2  double          TT as a 2-part Julian Date (Note 1)
18
///     dpsi,deps    double          nutation (Note 2)
19
///
20
///  Returned (function value):
21
///     (epsa, rb, rp, rbp, rn, rbpn) (f64, [[f64; 3]; 3], [[f64; 3]; 3], [[f64; 3]; 3], [[f64; 3]; 3], [[f64; 3]; 3])
22
///
23
///     epsa         mean obliquity (Note 3)
24
///     rb           frame bias matrix (Note 4)
25
///     rp           precession matrix (Note 5)
26
///     rbp          bias-precession matrix (Note 6)
27
///     rn           nutation matrix (Note 7)
28
///     rbpn         GCRS-to-true matrix (Note 8)
29
///
30
///  Notes:
31
///
32
///  1) The TT date date1+date2 is a Julian Date, apportioned in any
33
///     convenient way between the two arguments.  For example,
34
///     JD(TT)=2450123.7 could be expressed in any of these ways,
35
///     among others:
36
///
37
///  ```text
38
///            date1          date2
39
///
40
///         2450123.7           0.0       (JD method)
41
///         2451545.0       -1421.3       (J2000 method)
42
///         2400000.5       50123.2       (MJD method)
43
///         2450123.5           0.2       (date & time method)
44
///  ```
45
///
46
///     The JD method is the most natural and convenient to use in
47
///     cases where the loss of several decimal digits of resolution
48
///     is acceptable.  The J2000 method is best matched to the way
49
///     the argument is handled internally and will deliver the
50
///     optimum resolution.  The MJD method and the date & time methods
51
///     are both good compromises between resolution and convenience.
52
///
53
///  2) The caller is responsible for providing the nutation components;
54
///     they are in longitude and obliquity, in radians and are with
55
///     respect to the equinox and ecliptic of date.  For high-accuracy
56
///     applications, free core nutation should be included as well as
57
///     any other relevant corrections to the position of the CIP.
58
///
59
///  3) The returned mean obliquity is consistent with the IAU 2000
60
///     precession-nutation models.
61
///
62
///  4) The matrix rb transforms vectors from GCRS to J2000.0 mean
63
///     equator and equinox by applying frame bias.
64
///
65
///  5) The matrix rp transforms vectors from J2000.0 mean equator and
66
///     equinox to mean equator and equinox of date by applying
67
///     precession.
68
///
69
///  6) The matrix rbp transforms vectors from GCRS to mean equator and
70
///     equinox of date by applying frame bias then precession.  It is
71
///     the product rp x rb.
72
///
73
///  7) The matrix rn transforms vectors from mean equator and equinox of
74
///     date to true equator and equinox of date by applying the nutation
75
///     (luni-solar + planetary).
76
///
77
///  8) The matrix rbpn transforms vectors from GCRS to true equator and
78
///     equinox of date.  It is the product rn x rbp, applying frame
79
///     bias, precession and nutation in that order.
80
///
81
///  Called:
82
///     iauPr00      IAU 2000 precession adjustments
83
///     iauObl80     mean obliquity, IAU 1980
84
///     iauBp00      frame bias and precession matrices, IAU 2000
85
///     iauCr        copy r-matrix
86
///     iauNumat     form nutation matrix
87
///     iauRxr       product of two r-matrices
88
///
89
///  Reference:
90
///
91
///     Capitaine, N., Chapront, J., Lambert, S. and Wallace, P.,
92
///     "Expressions for the Celestial Intermediate Pole and Celestial
93
///     Ephemeris Origin consistent with the IAU 2000A precession-
94
///     nutation model", Astron.Astrophys. 400, 1145-1154 (2003)
95
///
96
///     n.b. The celestial ephemeris origin (CEO) was renamed "celestial
97
///          intermediate origin" (CIO) by IAU 2006 Resolution 2.
98
0
pub fn pn00(
99
0
    date1: f64,
100
0
    date2: f64,
101
0
    dpsi: f64,
102
0
    deps: f64,
103
0
) -> (
104
0
    f64,
105
0
    [[f64; 3]; 3],
106
0
    [[f64; 3]; 3],
107
0
    [[f64; 3]; 3],
108
0
    [[f64; 3]; 3],
109
0
    [[f64; 3]; 3],
110
0
) {
111
0
    let mut rbpn = [[0.0; 3]; 3];
112
113
    /* IAU 2000 precession-rate adjustments. */
114
0
    let (_, depspr) = pr00(date1, date2);
115
116
    /* Mean obliquity, consistent with IAU 2000 precession-nutation. */
117
0
    let epsa = obl80(date1, date2) + depspr;
118
119
    /* Frame bias and precession matrices and their product. */
120
0
    let (rb, rp, rbp) = bp00(date1, date2);
121
122
    /* Nutation matrix. */
123
0
    let rn = numat(epsa, dpsi, deps);
124
125
    /* Bias-precession-nutation matrix (classical). */
126
0
    rxr(&rn, &rbp, &mut rbpn);
127
128
0
    (epsa, rb, rp, rbp, rn, rbpn)
129
0
}