Fuzz introspector
For issues and ideas: https://github.com/ossf/fuzz-introspector/issues
Report generation date: 2023-06-07

Project overview: aiohttp

High level conclusions

Reachability and coverage overview

Functions statically reachable by fuzzers
4.0%
56 / 1374
Cyclomatic complexity statically reachable by fuzzers
5.0%
213 / 4680
Runtime code coverage of functions
19.0%
260 / 1374

Warning: The number of runtime covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that Fuzz Introspector found there are more functions covered at runtime than what is considered reachable based on the static analysis. This is a limitation in the analysis as anything covered at runtime is by definition reachable by the fuzzers.
This is likely due to a limitation in the static analysis. In this case, the count of functions covered at runtime is the true value, which means this is what should be considered "achieved" by the fuzzer.

Use the project functions table below to query all functions that were not covered at runtime.

Fuzzer details

Fuzzer: fuzz_http_parser_pure_python

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is
Color Runtime hitcount Callsite count Percentage
red 0 2 40.0%
gold [1:9] 0 0.0%
yellow [10:29] 0 0.0%
greenyellow [30:49] 0 0.0%
lawngreen 50+ 3 60.0%
All colors 5 100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked Calltree index Parent function Callsite Largest blocked function
2 0 EP call site: 00000 asyncio.get_event_loop

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions
270
Functions that are reachable but not covered
4
Reachable functions
5
Percentage of reachable functions covered
20.0%
NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.
Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.
Function name source code lines source lines hit percentage hit

Files reached

filename functions hit
/ 1
...aiohttp.fuzz_http_parser_pure_python 4

Fuzzer: fuzz_http_payload_parser_pure_python

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is
Color Runtime hitcount Callsite count Percentage
red 0 22 35.4%
gold [1:9] 0 0.0%
yellow [10:29] 0 0.0%
greenyellow [30:49] 0 0.0%
lawngreen 50+ 40 64.5%
All colors 62 100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked Calltree index Parent function Callsite Largest blocked function
12 10 aiohttp.compression_utils.ZLibDecompressor.__init__ call site: 00010 aiohttp.streams.StreamReader.feed_eof
4 42 aiohttp.http_parser.HttpPayloadParser.feed_data call site: 00042 aiohttp.streams.StreamReader.set_exception
3 0 EP call site: 00000 aiohttp.http_parser.HttpPayloadParser.__init__
1 8 aiohttp.compression_utils.ZLibDecompressor.__init__ call site: 00008 aiohttp.compression_utils.encoding_to_mode
1 28 aiohttp.streams.StreamReader.feed_data call site: 00028 aiohttp.helpers.set_result
1 54 aiohttp.http_parser.HttpPayloadParser.feed_data call site: 00054 aiohttp.helpers.set_result

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions
270
Functions that are reachable but not covered
16
Reachable functions
30
Percentage of reachable functions covered
46.67%
NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.
Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.
Function name source code lines source lines hit percentage hit

Files reached

filename functions hit
/ 1
...aiohttp.fuzz_http_payload_parser_pure_python 4
aiohttp.http_parser 17
aiohttp.compression_utils 4
aiohttp.streams 5
aiohttp.helpers 2
aiohttp.http_exceptions 1

Fuzzer: fuzz_payload_url

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is
Color Runtime hitcount Callsite count Percentage
red 0 27 43.5%
gold [1:9] 0 0.0%
yellow [10:29] 0 0.0%
greenyellow [30:49] 0 0.0%
lawngreen 50+ 35 56.4%
All colors 62 100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked Calltree index Parent function Callsite Largest blocked function
6 30 multidict._multidict_py.MultiDict._extend call site: 00030 used_keys.get
6 38 multidict._multidict_py.MultiDict._extend call site: 00038 multidict._multidict_py.CIMultiDict._title
5 0 EP call site: 00000 aiohttp.payload.StringPayload.__init__
4 12 multidict._multidict_py.MultiDict._extend call site: 00012 .list
3 55 aiohttp.helpers.parse_mimetype call site: 00055 multidict._multidict_py.MultiDictProxy.__init__
2 59 aiohttp.payload.StringPayload.__init__ call site: 00059 urllib.parse.urlencode.encode
1 45 multidict._multidict_py.MultiDictProxy.__init__ call site: 00045 _multidict.MultiDictProxy

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions
333
Functions that are reachable but not covered
27
Reachable functions
40
Percentage of reachable functions covered
32.5%
NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.
Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.
Function name source code lines source lines hit percentage hit

Files reached

filename functions hit
/ 1
...aiohttp.fuzz_payload_url 3
aiohttp.payload 5
aiohttp.helpers 11
multidict._multidict_py 20

Fuzzer: fuzz_http_parser

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is
Color Runtime hitcount Callsite count Percentage
red 0 2 40.0%
gold [1:9] 0 0.0%
yellow [10:29] 0 0.0%
greenyellow [30:49] 0 0.0%
lawngreen 50+ 3 60.0%
All colors 5 100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked Calltree index Parent function Callsite Largest blocked function
2 0 EP call site: 00000 asyncio.get_event_loop

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions
333
Functions that are reachable but not covered
4
Reachable functions
5
Percentage of reachable functions covered
20.0%
NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.
Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.
Function name source code lines source lines hit percentage hit

Files reached

filename functions hit
/ 1
...aiohttp.fuzz_http_parser 4

Fuzzer: fuzz_multipart

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is
Color Runtime hitcount Callsite count Percentage
red 0 46 44.6%
gold [1:9] 0 0.0%
yellow [10:29] 0 0.0%
greenyellow [30:49] 0 0.0%
lawngreen 50+ 57 55.3%
All colors 103 100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked Calltree index Parent function Callsite Largest blocked function
8 23 aiohttp.multipart.BodyPartReader.read_chunk call site: 00023 chunk.split
7 0 EP call site: 00000 ...aiohttp.fuzz_multipart.fuzz_bodypart_reader
7 79 multidict._multidict_py.MultiDict._extend call site: 00079 multidict._multidict_py.CIMultiDict._title
6 71 multidict._multidict_py.MultiDict._extend call site: 00071 used_keys.get
5 34 aiohttp.multipart.BodyPartReader.read call site: 00034 aiohttp.multipart.BodyPartReader._decode_content
4 53 multidict._multidict_py.MultiDict._extend call site: 00053 .list
2 10 aiohttp.multipart.BodyPartReader.read call site: 00010 aiohttp.multipart.BodyPartReader._read_chunk_from_length
2 96 aiohttp.helpers.parse_mimetype call site: 00096 multidict._multidict_py.MultiDictProxy.__init__
1 13 aiohttp.multipart.BodyPartReader.read_chunk call site: 00013 .len
1 40 aiohttp.compression_utils.ZLibDecompressor.__init__ call site: 00040 aiohttp.compression_utils.encoding_to_mode
1 42 aiohttp.compression_utils.ZLibDecompressor.__init__ call site: 00042 aiohttp.compression_utils.ZLibDecompressor.decompress_sync
1 45 aiohttp.multipart.BodyPartReader.get_charset call site: 00045 multidict._multidict_py.MultiDict.__init__

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions
332
Functions that are reachable but not covered
48
Reachable functions
70
Percentage of reachable functions covered
31.43%
NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.
Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.
Function name source code lines source lines hit percentage hit

Files reached

filename functions hit
/ 1
...aiohttp.fuzz_multipart 8
aiohttp.multipart 29
aiohttp.compression_utils 3
aiohttp.helpers 11
multidict._multidict_py 20

Fuzzer: fuzz_http_payload_parser

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is
Color Runtime hitcount Callsite count Percentage
red 0 22 35.4%
gold [1:9] 0 0.0%
yellow [10:29] 0 0.0%
greenyellow [30:49] 0 0.0%
lawngreen 50+ 40 64.5%
All colors 62 100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked Calltree index Parent function Callsite Largest blocked function
12 10 aiohttp.compression_utils.ZLibDecompressor.__init__ call site: 00010 aiohttp.streams.StreamReader.feed_eof
4 42 aiohttp.http_parser.HttpPayloadParser.feed_data call site: 00042 aiohttp.streams.StreamReader.set_exception
3 0 EP call site: 00000 aiohttp.http_parser.HttpPayloadParser.__init__
1 8 aiohttp.compression_utils.ZLibDecompressor.__init__ call site: 00008 aiohttp.compression_utils.encoding_to_mode
1 27 aiohttp.streams.StreamReader.feed_data call site: 00027 aiohttp.helpers.set_result
1 54 aiohttp.http_parser.HttpPayloadParser.feed_data call site: 00054 aiohttp.helpers.set_result

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions
333
Functions that are reachable but not covered
16
Reachable functions
30
Percentage of reachable functions covered
46.67%
NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.
Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.
Function name source code lines source lines hit percentage hit

Files reached

filename functions hit
/ 1
...aiohttp.fuzz_http_payload_parser 4
aiohttp.http_parser 17
aiohttp.compression_utils 4
aiohttp.streams 5
aiohttp.helpers 2
aiohttp.http_exceptions 1

Fuzzer: fuzz_web_request

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is
Color Runtime hitcount Callsite count Percentage
red 0 84 51.2%
gold [1:9] 0 0.0%
yellow [10:29] 0 0.0%
greenyellow [30:49] 0 0.0%
lawngreen 50+ 80 48.7%
All colors 164 100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked Calltree index Parent function Callsite Largest blocked function
36 127 aiohttp.helpers.parse_mimetype call site: 00127 aiohttp.web_request.BaseRequest.read
14 104 aiohttp.web_request.BaseRequest.post call site: 00104 aiohttp.web_request.BaseRequest.multipart
7 39 multidict._multidict_py.MultiDict._extend call site: 00039 multidict._multidict_py.CIMultiDict._title
6 0 EP call site: 00000 ...aiohttp.fuzz_web_request.fuzz_run_one_async
6 25 multidict._multidict_py.MultiDict._extend call site: 00025 used_keys.get
6 60 multidict._multidict_py._Base.items call site: 00060 multidict._multidict_py.MultiDict.__init__
4 13 multidict._multidict_py.MultiDict._extend call site: 00013 .list
3 56 aiohttp.test_utils.make_mocked_request call site: 00056 multidict._multidict_py._Base.items
1 94 aiohttp.web_urldispatcher.UrlMappingMatchInfo.__init__ call site: 00094 unittest.mock.Mock
1 98 ...aiohttp.fuzz_web_request.fuzz_run_one_async call site: 00098 aiohttp.web_request.BaseRequest.post

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions
333
Functions that are reachable but not covered
70
Reachable functions
95
Percentage of reachable functions covered
26.32%
NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.
Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.
Function name source code lines source lines hit percentage hit

Files reached

filename functions hit
/ 1
...aiohttp.fuzz_web_request 10
multidict._multidict_py 24
aiohttp.test_utils 25
aiohttp.web_request 31
aiohttp.web_urldispatcher 2
aiohttp.multipart 3
aiohttp.helpers 11

Analyses and suggestions

Optimal target analysis

Remaining optimal interesting functions

The following table shows a list of functions that are optimal targets. Optimal targets are identified by finding the functions that in combination, yield a high code coverage.

Func name Functions filename Arg count Args Function depth hitcount instr count bb count cyclomatic complexity Reachable functions Incoming references total cyclomatic complexity Unreached complexity
aiohttp.client.ClientSession._ws_connect aiohttp.client 19 ['N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A'] 5 0 5 16 9 231 1 787 735
aiohttp.connector.BaseConnector.connect aiohttp.connector 4 ['N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A'] 4 0 23 12 8 187 0 628 246
aiohttp.web.main aiohttp.web 1 ['N/A'] 3 0 12 3 4 88 1 276 240
aiohttp.web_protocol.RequestHandler.start aiohttp.web_protocol 1 ['N/A'] 4 0 16 14 9 92 1 316 237
yarl._url.URL.__new__ yarl._url 4 ['N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A'] 2 0 2 10 7 34 0 114 96
aiohttp.web_urldispatcher.UrlDispatcher.add_resource aiohttp.web_urldispatcher 3 ['N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A'] 2 0 2 4 5 25 9 83 65
aiohttp.multipart.parse_content_disposition aiohttp.multipart 1 ['N/A'] 2 0 9 15 9 22 3 75 63

Implementing fuzzers that target the above functions will improve reachability such that it becomes:

Functions statically reachable by fuzzers
16.0%
214 / 1374
Cyclomatic complexity statically reachable by fuzzers
18.0%
865 / 4680

All functions overview

If you implement fuzzers for these functions, the status of all functions in the project will be:

Func name Functions filename Args Function call depth Reached by Fuzzers Fuzzers runtime hit Func lines hit % I Count BB Count Cyclomatic complexity Functions reached Reached by functions Accumulated cyclomatic complexity Undiscovered complexity

Runtime coverage analysis

This section shows analysis of runtime coverage data.

For futher technical details on how this section is generated, please see the Glossary .

Complex functions with low coverage

Func name Function total lines Lines covered at runtime percentage covered Reached by fuzzers
aiohttp.web._run_app 34 0 0.0% []
aiohttp.web_ws.WebSocketResponse._handshake 35 0 0.0% []
aiohttp.web_ws.WebSocketResponse.close 43 0 0.0% []
aiohttp.web_ws.WebSocketResponse.receive 52 0 0.0% []
aiohttp.client_proto.ResponseHandler.data_received 37 0 0.0% []
aiohttp.web_response.StreamResponse._prepare_headers 41 0 0.0% []
aiohttp.web_response.Response.__init__ 39 2 5.128% []
aiohttp.web_request.BaseRequest.forwarded 32 3 9.375% []
aiohttp.web_request.BaseRequest.post 56 4 7.142% ['fuzz_web_request']
out.getvalue 118 41 34.74% []
aiohttp.client_reqrep.ClientRequest.__init__ 41 0 0.0% []
aiohttp.client_reqrep.ClientRequest.send 36 0 0.0% []
typing_extensions.get_args 1223 309 25.26% []
aiohttp.http_websocket.ws_ext_parse 33 4 12.12% []
aiohttp.http_websocket.WebSocketReader._feed_data 56 0 0.0% []
aiohttp.http_websocket.WebSocketReader.parse_frame 82 11 13.41% []
aiohttp.http_websocket.WebSocketWriter._send_frame 39 0 0.0% []
aiohttp.multipart.parse_content_disposition.unescape 53 0 0.0% []
aiohttp.connector.BaseConnector.connect 58 0 0.0% []
aiohttp.connector.TCPConnector._resolve_host 43 0 0.0% []
aiohttp.connector.TCPConnector._create_proxy_connection 46 2 4.347% []
aiodns.DNSResolver 94 27 28.72% []
aiohttp.web_protocol.RequestHandler.__init__ 34 0 0.0% []
aiohttp.web_protocol.RequestHandler.start 77 0 0.0% []
aiohttp.web_fileresponse.FileResponse.prepare 79 0 0.0% []
aiohttp.client.ClientSession.__init__ 47 3 6.382% []
aiohttp.client.ClientSession._request 160 18 11.25% []
aiohttp.client.ClientSession._ws_connect 71 17 23.94% []
aiohttp.cookiejar.CookieJar.update_cookies 48 0 0.0% []
aiohttp.cookiejar.CookieJar.filter_cookies 31 0 0.0% []
aiohttp.cookiejar.CookieJar._parse_date 49 2 4.081% []
aiohttp.client_ws.ClientWebSocketResponse.close 37 0 0.0% []
aiohttp.client_ws.ClientWebSocketResponse.receive 50 0 0.0% []

Files and Directories in report

This section shows which files and directories are considered in this report. The main reason for showing this is fuzz introspector may include more code in the reasoning than is desired. This section helps identify if too many files/directories are included, e.g. third party code, which may be irrelevant for the threat model. In the event too much is included, fuzz introspector supports a configuration file that can exclude data from the report. See the following link for more information on how to create a config file: link

Files in report

Source file Reached by Covered by
[] []
string [] []
multidict._multidict_base [] []
warnings [] []
signal [] []
aiohttp.resolver [] []
dataclasses [] []
array [] []
importlib [] []
time [] []
aiohttp.web_response [] []
aiohttp.client [] []
atheris [] []
platform [] []
_helpers [] []
aiohttp.abc [] []
pickle [] []
aiohttp.formdata [] []
aiohttp.web_server [] []
typing_extensions [] []
multidict._compat [] []
aiohttp.multipart ['fuzz_multipart', 'fuzz_web_request'] []
ssl [] []
json [] []
aiohttp.http [] []
gunicorn [] []
aiohttp.hdrs [] []
cchardet [] []
async_timeout [] []
aiohttp.locks [] []
aiohttp.compression_utils ['fuzz_http_payload_parser_pure_python', 'fuzz_multipart', 'fuzz_http_payload_parser'] []
io [] []
hashlib [] []
yarl._quoting [] []
yarl._url [] []
charset_normalizer [] []
_multidict [] []
codecs [] []
aiohttp.client_exceptions [] []
types [] []
frozenlist [] []
aiohttp.worker [] []
pathlib [] []
aiohttp.web [] []
aiohttp.tracing [] []
aiohttp.web_log [] []
aiohttp.http_parser ['fuzz_http_payload_parser_pure_python', 'fuzz_http_payload_parser'] []
_websocket [] []
aiohttp.payload ['fuzz_payload_url'] []
aiohttp.connector [] []
multidict [] []
aiohttp.client_ws [] []
logging [] []
aiohttp.log [] []
tempfile [] []
idna [] []
aiohttp.http_exceptions ['fuzz_http_payload_parser_pure_python', 'fuzz_http_payload_parser'] []
brotli [] []
aiohttp [] []
itertools [] []
...aiohttp.fuzz_multipart ['fuzz_multipart'] []
struct [] []
random [] []
aiohttp.web_request ['fuzz_web_request'] []
aiohttp.cookiejar [] []
aiohttp.client_reqrep [] []
...aiohttp.fuzz_http_payload_parser_pure_python ['fuzz_http_payload_parser_pure_python'] []
datetime [] []
os [] []
zlib [] []
multidict._multidict_py ['fuzz_payload_url', 'fuzz_multipart', 'fuzz_web_request'] []
unittest [] []
...aiohttp.fuzz_web_request ['fuzz_web_request'] []
uvloop [] []
netrc [] []
uuid [] []
gc [] []
...aiohttp.fuzz_payload_url ['fuzz_payload_url'] []
argparse [] []
...aiohttp.fuzz_http_payload_parser ['fuzz_http_payload_parser'] []
mimetypes [] []
aiohttp.client_proto [] []
ipaddress [] []
base64 [] []
abc [] []
aiohttp.test_utils ['fuzz_web_request'] []
http [] []
socket [] []
yarl [] []
aiosignal [] []
urllib [] []
aiohttp.tcp_helpers [] []
aiohttp.base_protocol [] []
functools [] []
contextlib [] []
aiohttp.web_runner [] []
aiohttp.web_app [] []
aiohttp.http_writer [] []
aiohttp.web_exceptions [] []
_abc [] []
sys [] []
aiohttp.pytest_plugin [] []
typing [] []
asyncio [] []
aiohttp.web_fileresponse [] []
aiohttp.streams ['fuzz_http_payload_parser_pure_python', 'fuzz_http_payload_parser'] []
aiohttp.web_middlewares [] []
collections [] []
...aiohttp.fuzz_http_parser ['fuzz_http_parser'] []
math [] []
aiohttp.web_protocol [] []
_quoting_c [] []
yarl._quoting_py [] []
email [] []
keyword [] []
aiodns [] []
[] []
aiohttp.web_ws [] []
aiohttp.web_urldispatcher ['fuzz_web_request'] []
enum [] []
inspect [] []
binascii [] []
aiohttp.helpers ['fuzz_http_payload_parser_pure_python', 'fuzz_payload_url', 'fuzz_multipart', 'fuzz_http_payload_parser', 'fuzz_web_request'] []
html [] []
...aiohttp.fuzz_http_parser_pure_python ['fuzz_http_parser_pure_python'] []
traceback [] []
_http_parser [] []
aiohttp.http_websocket [] []
aiohttp.typedefs [] []
re [] []
multidict._abc [] []
aiohttp.web_routedef [] []
ClientSession [] []
weakref [] []

Directories in report

Directory