Fuzz introspector
For issues and ideas: https://github.com/ossf/fuzz-introspector/issues
Report generation date: 2024-01-26

Project overview: aiohttp

High level conclusions

Reachability and coverage overview

Functions statically reachable by fuzzers
4.0%
54 / 1382
Cyclomatic complexity statically reachable by fuzzers
4.0%
209 / 4711
Runtime code coverage of functions
18.0%
248 / 1382

Warning: The number of runtime covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that Fuzz Introspector found there are more functions covered at runtime than what is considered reachable based on the static analysis. This is a limitation in the analysis as anything covered at runtime is by definition reachable by the fuzzers.
This is likely due to a limitation in the static analysis. In this case, the count of functions covered at runtime is the true value, which means this is what should be considered "achieved" by the fuzzer.

Use the project functions table below to query all functions that were not covered at runtime.

Fuzzer details

Fuzzer: fuzz_http_payload_parser

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is
Color Runtime hitcount Callsite count Percentage
red 0 31 42.4%
gold [1:9] 0 0.0%
yellow [10:29] 0 0.0%
greenyellow [30:49] 0 0.0%
lawngreen 50+ 42 57.5%
All colors 73 100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked Calltree index Parent function Callsite Largest blocked function
24 0 EP call site: 00000 aiohttp.http_parser.HttpPayloadParser.feed_data
4 44 aiohttp.http_parser.HttpPayloadParser.feed_data call site: 00044 aiohttp.streams.StreamReader.set_exception
1 29 aiohttp.streams.StreamReader.feed_data call site: 00029 aiohttp.helpers.set_result
1 38 aiohttp.http_parser.HttpPayloadParser.feed_data call site: 00038 size_b.strip
1 60 aiohttp.http_parser.HttpPayloadParser.feed_data call site: 00060 aiohttp.helpers.set_result

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions
257
Functions that are reachable but not covered
24
Reachable functions
34
Percentage of reachable functions covered
29.41%
NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.
Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.
Function name source code lines source lines hit percentage hit

Files reached

filename functions hit
/ 1
...aiohttp.fuzz_http_payload_parser 4
aiohttp.http_parser 20
aiohttp.compression_utils 5
aiohttp.streams 5
aiohttp.helpers 2
aiohttp.http_exceptions 1

Fuzzer: fuzz_http_payload_parser_pure_python

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is
Color Runtime hitcount Callsite count Percentage
red 0 31 42.4%
gold [1:9] 0 0.0%
yellow [10:29] 0 0.0%
greenyellow [30:49] 0 0.0%
lawngreen 50+ 42 57.5%
All colors 73 100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked Calltree index Parent function Callsite Largest blocked function
24 0 EP call site: 00000 aiohttp.http_parser.HttpPayloadParser.feed_data
4 44 aiohttp.http_parser.HttpPayloadParser.feed_data call site: 00044 aiohttp.streams.StreamReader.set_exception
1 29 aiohttp.streams.StreamReader.feed_data call site: 00029 aiohttp.helpers.set_result
1 38 aiohttp.http_parser.HttpPayloadParser.feed_data call site: 00038 size_b.strip
1 60 aiohttp.http_parser.HttpPayloadParser.feed_data call site: 00060 aiohttp.helpers.set_result

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions
257
Functions that are reachable but not covered
24
Reachable functions
34
Percentage of reachable functions covered
29.41%
NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.
Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.
Function name source code lines source lines hit percentage hit

Files reached

filename functions hit
/ 1
...aiohttp.fuzz_http_payload_parser_pure_python 4
aiohttp.http_parser 20
aiohttp.compression_utils 5
aiohttp.streams 5
aiohttp.helpers 2
aiohttp.http_exceptions 1

Fuzzer: fuzz_web_request

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is
Color Runtime hitcount Callsite count Percentage
red 0 83 51.2%
gold [1:9] 0 0.0%
yellow [10:29] 0 0.0%
greenyellow [30:49] 0 0.0%
lawngreen 50+ 79 48.7%
All colors 162 100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked Calltree index Parent function Callsite Largest blocked function
36 125 aiohttp.helpers.parse_mimetype call site: 00125 aiohttp.web_request.BaseRequest.read
14 102 aiohttp.web_request.BaseRequest.post call site: 00102 aiohttp.web_request.BaseRequest.multipart
9 38 multidict._multidict_py.MultiDict._extend call site: 00038 aiohttp.test_utils.make_mocked_request
6 30 multidict._multidict_py.MultiDict._extend call site: 00030 used_keys.get
5 0 EP call site: 00000 ...aiohttp.fuzz_web_request.fuzz_run_one_async
5 60 multidict._multidict_py._Base.items call site: 00060 multidict._multidict_py.MultiDict.__init__
4 12 multidict._multidict_py.MultiDict._extend call site: 00012 .list
3 56 aiohttp.test_utils.make_mocked_request call site: 00056 multidict._multidict_py._Base.items
1 92 aiohttp.web_urldispatcher.UrlMappingMatchInfo.__init__ call site: 00092 unittest.mock.Mock

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions
322
Functions that are reachable but not covered
68
Reachable functions
93
Percentage of reachable functions covered
26.88%
NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.
Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.
Function name source code lines source lines hit percentage hit

Files reached

filename functions hit
/ 1
...aiohttp.fuzz_web_request 10
multidict._multidict_py 24
aiohttp.test_utils 23
aiohttp.web_request 31
aiohttp.web_urldispatcher 2
aiohttp.multipart 3
aiohttp.helpers 11

Fuzzer: fuzz_multipart

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is
Color Runtime hitcount Callsite count Percentage
red 0 48 61.5%
gold [1:9] 0 0.0%
yellow [10:29] 0 0.0%
greenyellow [30:49] 0 0.0%
lawngreen 50+ 30 38.4%
All colors 78 100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked Calltree index Parent function Callsite Largest blocked function
19 45 aiohttp.multipart.BodyPartReader.get_charset call site: 00045 aiohttp.client_reqrep.ClientResponse.links
9 34 aiohttp.multipart.BodyPartReader.read call site: 00034 aiohttp.multipart.BodyPartReader._decode_content
8 23 aiohttp.multipart.BodyPartReader.read_chunk call site: 00023 chunk.split
7 0 EP call site: 00000 ...aiohttp.fuzz_multipart.fuzz_bodypart_reader
2 10 aiohttp.multipart.BodyPartReader.read call site: 00010 aiohttp.multipart.BodyPartReader._read_chunk_from_length
1 13 aiohttp.multipart.BodyPartReader.read_chunk call site: 00013 .len
1 72 aiohttp.helpers.parse_mimetype call site: 00072 multidict.MultiDictProxy
1 76 aiohttp.multipart.BodyPartReader.form call site: 00076 asyncio.run

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions
257
Functions that are reachable but not covered
49
Reachable functions
57
Percentage of reachable functions covered
14.04%
NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.
Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.
Function name source code lines source lines hit percentage hit

Files reached

filename functions hit
/ 1
...aiohttp.fuzz_multipart 8
aiohttp.multipart 29
aiohttp.compression_utils 3
aiohttp.helpers 9
aiohttp.client_reqrep 10

Fuzzer: fuzz_http_parser_pure_python

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is
Color Runtime hitcount Callsite count Percentage
red 0 3 60.0%
gold [1:9] 0 0.0%
yellow [10:29] 0 0.0%
greenyellow [30:49] 0 0.0%
lawngreen 50+ 2 40.0%
All colors 5 100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked Calltree index Parent function Callsite Largest blocked function
3 0 EP call site: 00000 asyncio.get_event_loop

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions
257
Functions that are reachable but not covered
4
Reachable functions
5
Percentage of reachable functions covered
20.0%
NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.
Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.
Function name source code lines source lines hit percentage hit

Files reached

filename functions hit
/ 1
...aiohttp.fuzz_http_parser_pure_python 4

Fuzzer: fuzz_http_parser

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is
Color Runtime hitcount Callsite count Percentage
red 0 3 60.0%
gold [1:9] 0 0.0%
yellow [10:29] 0 0.0%
greenyellow [30:49] 0 0.0%
lawngreen 50+ 2 40.0%
All colors 5 100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked Calltree index Parent function Callsite Largest blocked function
3 0 EP call site: 00000 asyncio.get_event_loop

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions
257
Functions that are reachable but not covered
4
Reachable functions
5
Percentage of reachable functions covered
20.0%
NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.
Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.
Function name source code lines source lines hit percentage hit

Files reached

filename functions hit
/ 1
...aiohttp.fuzz_http_parser 4

Fuzzer: fuzz_payload_url

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is
Color Runtime hitcount Callsite count Percentage
red 0 27 43.5%
gold [1:9] 0 0.0%
yellow [10:29] 0 0.0%
greenyellow [30:49] 0 0.0%
lawngreen 50+ 35 56.4%
All colors 62 100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked Calltree index Parent function Callsite Largest blocked function
6 0 EP call site: 00000 aiohttp.payload.StringPayload.__init__
6 31 multidict._multidict_py.MultiDict._extend call site: 00031 used_keys.get
5 39 multidict._multidict_py.MultiDict._extend call site: 00039 multidict._multidict_py.CIMultiDict._title
4 13 multidict._multidict_py.MultiDict._extend call site: 00013 .list
3 55 aiohttp.helpers.parse_mimetype call site: 00055 multidict._multidict_py.MultiDictProxy.__init__
2 59 aiohttp.payload.StringPayload.__init__ call site: 00059 ...aiohttp.fuzz_payload_url.TestOneInput.original.encode
1 45 multidict._multidict_py.MultiDictProxy.__init__ call site: 00045 _multidict.MultiDictProxy

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions
322
Functions that are reachable but not covered
27
Reachable functions
40
Percentage of reachable functions covered
32.5%
NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.
Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.
Function name source code lines source lines hit percentage hit

Files reached

filename functions hit
/ 1
...aiohttp.fuzz_payload_url 3
aiohttp.payload 5
aiohttp.helpers 11
multidict._multidict_py 20

Analyses and suggestions

Optimal target analysis

Remaining optimal interesting functions

The following table shows a list of functions that are optimal targets. Optimal targets are identified by finding the functions that in combination, yield a high code coverage.

Func name Functions filename Arg count Args Function depth hitcount instr count bb count cyclomatic complexity Reachable functions Incoming references total cyclomatic complexity Unreached complexity
aiohttp.client.ClientSession._ws_connect aiohttp.client 20 ['N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A'] 6 0 5 16 9 233 1 792 709
aiohttp.connector.BaseConnector.connect aiohttp.connector 4 ['N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A'] 8 0 23 12 8 198 0 663 275
aiohttp.web.main aiohttp.web 1 ['N/A'] 5 0 12 3 4 94 1 295 259
aiohttp.web_protocol.RequestHandler.start aiohttp.web_protocol 1 ['N/A'] 5 0 16 14 9 99 1 338 247
yarl._url.URL.__new__ yarl._url 4 ['N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A'] 3 0 2 10 7 34 0 114 96
aiohttp.web_urldispatcher.UrlDispatcher.add_resource aiohttp.web_urldispatcher 3 ['N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A'] 4 0 2 4 5 29 9 95 77
aiohttp.multipart.parse_content_disposition aiohttp.multipart 1 ['N/A'] 2 0 9 15 9 22 3 75 63

Implementing fuzzers that target the above functions will improve reachability such that it becomes:

Functions statically reachable by fuzzers
15.0%
211 / 1382
Cyclomatic complexity statically reachable by fuzzers
18.0%
860 / 4711

All functions overview

If you implement fuzzers for these functions, the status of all functions in the project will be:

Func name Functions filename Args Function call depth Reached by Fuzzers Fuzzers runtime hit Func lines hit % I Count BB Count Cyclomatic complexity Functions reached Reached by functions Accumulated cyclomatic complexity Undiscovered complexity

Fuzz engine guidance

This sections provides heuristics that can be used as input to a fuzz engine when running a given fuzz target. The current focus is on providing input that is usable by libFuzzer.

/src/aiohttp/fuzz_http_payload_parser.py

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag


Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['aiohttp.http_parser.HttpPayloadParser.feed_data', 'aiohttp.streams.StreamReader.feed_data']

/src/aiohttp/fuzz_http_payload_parser_pure_python.py

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag


Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['aiohttp.http_parser.HttpPayloadParser.feed_data', 'aiohttp.streams.StreamReader.feed_data']

/src/aiohttp/fuzz_web_request.py

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag


Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['aiohttp.helpers.parse_mimetype', 'aiohttp.web_request.BaseRequest.post', 'multidict._multidict_py.MultiDict._extend', 'multidict._multidict_py._Base.items', 'aiohttp.test_utils.make_mocked_request', 'aiohttp.web_urldispatcher.UrlMappingMatchInfo.__init__']

/src/aiohttp/fuzz_multipart.py

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag


Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['aiohttp.multipart.BodyPartReader.get_charset', 'aiohttp.multipart.BodyPartReader.read', 'aiohttp.multipart.BodyPartReader.read_chunk', 'aiohttp.helpers.parse_mimetype', 'aiohttp.multipart.BodyPartReader.form']

/src/aiohttp/fuzz_http_parser_pure_python.py

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag


/src/aiohttp/fuzz_http_parser.py

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag


/src/aiohttp/fuzz_payload_url.py

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag


Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['multidict._multidict_py.MultiDict._extend', 'aiohttp.helpers.parse_mimetype', 'aiohttp.payload.StringPayload.__init__', 'multidict._multidict_py.MultiDictProxy.__init__']

Runtime coverage analysis

This section shows analysis of runtime coverage data.

For futher technical details on how this section is generated, please see the Glossary .

Complex functions with low coverage

Func name Function total lines Lines covered at runtime percentage covered Reached by fuzzers
aiohttp.web._run_app._wait 38 0 0.0% []
aiohttp.web_fileresponse.FileResponse.prepare 73 0 0.0% []
aiohttp.client.ClientSession.__init__ 49 2 4.081% []
aiohttp.client.ClientSession._request 167 20 11.97% []
aiohttp.client.ClientSession._ws_connect 70 14 20.0% []
aiohttp.web_request.BaseRequest.forwarded 32 3 9.375% []
aiohttp.web_request.BaseRequest.post 56 4 7.142% ['fuzz_web_request']
aiohttp.web_response.StreamResponse._prepare_headers 44 0 0.0% []
aiohttp.web_response.Response.__init__ 39 2 5.128% []
aiohttp.web_protocol.RequestHandler.__init__ 34 0 0.0% []
aiohttp.web_protocol.RequestHandler.start 77 0 0.0% []
aiohttp.connector.BaseConnector.connect 58 0 0.0% []
aiohttp.connector.TCPConnector._resolve_host 43 0 0.0% []
aiohttp.connector.TCPConnector._create_direct_connection.drop_exception 33 0 0.0% []
aiohttp.connector.TCPConnector._create_proxy_connection 46 2 4.347% []
aiohttp.http_websocket.ws_ext_parse 31 4 12.90% []
aiohttp.http_websocket.WebSocketReader._feed_data 56 0 0.0% []
aiohttp.http_websocket.WebSocketReader.parse_frame 83 10 12.04% []
aiohttp.http_websocket.WebSocketWriter._send_frame 39 0 0.0% []
aiohttp.multipart.parse_content_disposition.unescape 53 0 0.0% []
aiohttp.client_reqrep.ClientRequest.__init__ 42 0 0.0% []
aiohttp.client_reqrep.ClientRequest.send 36 0 0.0% []
async_timeout.timeout_at 116 39 33.62% []
aiohttp.cookiejar.CookieJar.update_cookies 46 0 0.0% []
aiohttp.cookiejar.CookieJar.filter_cookies 41 0 0.0% []
aiohttp.cookiejar.CookieJar._parse_date 49 2 4.081% []
aiohttp.client_proto.ResponseHandler.data_received 37 0 0.0% []
aiohttp.client_ws.ClientWebSocketResponse.close 38 0 0.0% []
aiohttp.client_ws.ClientWebSocketResponse.receive 50 0 0.0% []
aiodns.DNSResolver 107 29 27.10% []
aiohttp.web_ws.WebSocketResponse._handshake 35 0 0.0% []
aiohttp.web_ws.WebSocketResponse.close 44 0 0.0% []
aiohttp.web_ws.WebSocketResponse.receive 52 0 0.0% []

Files and Directories in report

This section shows which files and directories are considered in this report. The main reason for showing this is fuzz introspector may include more code in the reasoning than is desired. This section helps identify if too many files/directories are included, e.g. third party code, which may be irrelevant for the threat model. In the event too much is included, fuzz introspector supports a configuration file that can exclude data from the report. See the following link for more information on how to create a config file: link

Files in report

Source file Reached by Covered by
[] []
weakref [] []
_quoting_c [] []
yarl [] []
multidict._compat [] []
contextlib [] []
math [] []
io [] []
aiohappyeyeballs [] []
types [] []
http [] []
traceback [] []
string [] []
aiohttp.helpers ['fuzz_http_payload_parser', 'fuzz_http_payload_parser_pure_python', 'fuzz_web_request', 'fuzz_multipart', 'fuzz_payload_url'] []
typing [] []
ssl [] []
yarl._quoting_py [] []
argparse [] []
aiohttp.client [] []
...aiohttp.fuzz_multipart ['fuzz_multipart'] []
zlib [] []
functools [] []
brotlicffi [] []
aiohttp.web_app [] []
aiosignal [] []
aiohttp [] []
aiohttp.web_server [] []
urllib [] []
pathlib [] []
aiohttp.hdrs [] []
...aiohttp.fuzz_web_request ['fuzz_web_request'] []
aiohttp.client_exceptions [] []
aiohttp.http_parser ['fuzz_http_payload_parser', 'fuzz_http_payload_parser_pure_python'] []
dataclasses [] []
inspect [] []
yarl._url [] []
aiohttp.web_runner [] []
aiohttp.web_middlewares [] []
_websocket [] []
time [] []
sys [] []
platform [] []
aiohttp.http [] []
uvloop [] []
logging [] []
...aiohttp.fuzz_payload_url ['fuzz_payload_url'] []
aiohttp.http_writer [] []
random [] []
calendar [] []
aiohttp.client_reqrep ['fuzz_multipart'] []
aiohttp.pytest_plugin [] []
json [] []
aiohttp.resolver [] []
abc [] []
ipaddress [] []
textwrap [] []
aiohttp.tcp_helpers [] []
_abc [] []
datetime [] []
_helpers [] []
aiohttp.client_ws [] []
aiohttp.streams ['fuzz_http_payload_parser', 'fuzz_http_payload_parser_pure_python'] []
[] []
re [] []
gunicorn [] []
...aiohttp.fuzz_http_payload_parser ['fuzz_http_payload_parser'] []
codecs [] []
aiohttp.web_ws [] []
aiohttp.multipart ['fuzz_web_request', 'fuzz_multipart'] []
aiohttp.web_routedef [] []
async_timeout [] []
aiohttp.web_response [] []
aiohttp.base_protocol [] []
os [] []
socket [] []
aiohttp.tracing [] []
aiodns [] []
pickle [] []
brotli [] []
aiohttp.cookiejar [] []
html [] []
base64 [] []
aiohttp.web_urldispatcher ['fuzz_web_request'] []
gc [] []
aiohttp.formdata [] []
aiohttp.test_utils ['fuzz_web_request'] []
multidict [] []
collections [] []
aiohttp.web_fileresponse [] []
multidict._multidict_py ['fuzz_web_request', 'fuzz_payload_url'] []
...aiohttp.fuzz_http_parser_pure_python ['fuzz_http_parser_pure_python'] []
aiohttp.payload ['fuzz_payload_url'] []
_multidict [] []
aiohttp.log [] []
...aiohttp.fuzz_http_parser ['fuzz_http_parser'] []
keyword [] []
aiohttp.worker [] []
...aiohttp.fuzz_http_payload_parser_pure_python ['fuzz_http_payload_parser_pure_python'] []
aiohttp.http_exceptions ['fuzz_http_payload_parser', 'fuzz_http_payload_parser_pure_python'] []
atheris [] []
frozenlist [] []
itertools [] []
asyncio [] []
aiohttp.web [] []
aiohttp.web_exceptions [] []
aiohttp.locks [] []
aiohttp.http_websocket [] []
hashlib [] []
aiohttp.web_protocol [] []
aiohttp.typedefs [] []
uuid [] []
warnings [] []
email [] []
aiohttp.web_log [] []
importlib [] []
tempfile [] []
idna [] []
struct [] []
aiohttp.compression_utils ['fuzz_http_payload_parser', 'fuzz_http_payload_parser_pure_python', 'fuzz_multipart'] []
binascii [] []
array [] []
yarl._quoting [] []
netrc [] []
_http_parser [] []
signal [] []
aiohttp.client_proto [] []
aiohttp.connector [] []
unittest [] []
aiohttp.abc [] []
multidict._multidict_base [] []
ClientSession [] []
enum [] []
multidict._abc [] []
aiohttp.web_request ['fuzz_web_request'] []
mimetypes [] []

Directories in report

Directory