Fuzz introspector
For issues and ideas: https://github.com/ossf/fuzz-introspector/issues
Project coverage

Table of contents

Project overview: flask-wtf
High level conclusions
Reachability and coverage overview
Fuzzers overview
Project functions overview
Fuzzer details
Fuzzer: fuzz_flask_wtf
Call tree
Fuzz blockers
Runtime coverage analysis
Files reached
Analyses and suggestions
Optimal target analysis
Remaining optimal interesting functions
All functions overview
Fuzz engine guidance
/src/fuzz_flask_wtf.py
Dictionary
Fuzzer function priority
Runtime coverage analysis
Complex functions with low coverage
Files and Directories in report
Files in report
Directories in report
Metadata section
Report generation date: 2025-07-04

Project overview: flask-wtf

High level conclusions

Reachability and coverage overview

Functions statically reachable by fuzzers
3.0%
17 / 589
Cyclomatic complexity statically reachable by fuzzers
3.0%
62 / 1975
Runtime code coverage of functions
32.0%
190 / 589

Warning: The number of runtime covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that Fuzz Introspector found there are more functions covered at runtime than what is considered reachable based on the static analysis. This is a limitation in the analysis as anything covered at runtime is by definition reachable by the fuzzers.
This is likely due to a limitation in the static analysis. In this case, the count of functions covered at runtime is the true value, which means this is what should be considered "achieved" by the fuzzer.

Use the project functions table below to query all functions that were not covered at runtime.

Fuzzers overview

Fuzzer Fuzzer filename Functions Reached Functions unreached Fuzzer depth Files reached Basic blocks reached Cyclomatic complexity Details
fuzz_flask_wtf /src/fuzz_flask_wtf.py 57 1110 6 9 31 179 fuzz_flask_wtf.py

Project functions overview

The following table shows data about each function in the project. The functions included in this table correspond to all functions that exist in the executables of the fuzzers. As such, there may be functions that are from third-party libraries.

For further technical details on the meaning of columns in the below table, please see the Glossary .

Func name Functions filename Args Function call depth Reached by Fuzzers Runtime reached by Fuzzers Combined reached by Fuzzers Fuzzers runtime hit Func lines hit % I Count BB Count Cyclomatic complexity Functions reached Reached by functions Accumulated cyclomatic complexity Undiscovered complexity

Fuzzer details

Fuzzer: fuzz_flask_wtf

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Full calltree

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is
Color Runtime hitcount Callsite count Percentage
red 0 19 24.0%
gold [1:9] 0 0.0%
yellow [10:29] 0 0.0%
greenyellow [30:49] 0 0.0%
lawngreen 50+ 60 75.9%
All colors 79 100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked Calltree index Parent function Callsite Largest blocked function
7 55 ...fuzz_flask_wtf.fuzz_csrf call site: 00055 flask_wtf.csrf._get_config
4 8 flask_wtf.i18n._get_translations call site: 00008 os.path.abspath
2 5 flask_wtf.i18n.Translations.gettext call site: 00005 .getattr
2 71 flask_wtf.csrf.generate_csrf call site: 00071 os.urandom
1 28 flask.app.Flask.__init__ call site: 00028 flask.sansio.scaffold._endpoint_from_view_func
1 42 flask.app.Flask.test_request_context call site: 00042 .bool
1 45 flask.testing.EnvironBuilder.__init__ call site: 00045 app_root.lstrip
1 75 flask_wtf.csrf.generate_csrf call site: 00075 g.get

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions
265
Functions that are reachable but not covered
43
Reachable functions
57
Percentage of reachable functions covered
24.56%
NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.
Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.
Function name source code lines source lines hit percentage hit

Files reached

filename functions hit
/ 1
...fuzz_flask_wtf 12
flask_wtf.i18n 7
wtforms.i18n 4
flask.app 11
flask.sansio.app 8
flask.testing 5
flask.ctx 2
flask_wtf.csrf 10

Analyses and suggestions

Optimal target analysis

Remaining optimal interesting functions

The following table shows a list of functions that are optimal targets. Optimal targets are identified by finding the functions that in combination, yield a high code coverage.

Func name Functions filename Arg count Args Function depth hitcount instr count bb count cyclomatic complexity Reachable functions Incoming references total cyclomatic complexity Unreached complexity
flask.app.Flask.wsgi_app flask.app 3 ['N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A'] 6 0 5 2 4 61 1 210 187
flask.sansio.app.App.__init__ flask.sansio.app 11 ['N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A'] 4 0 2 2 4 30 0 98 83
flask.sansio.blueprints.Blueprint.register flask.sansio.blueprints 3 ['N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A'] 3 0 8 14 9 24 0 84 75
flask.cli.ScriptInfo.load_app flask.cli 1 ['N/A'] 4 0 1 6 5 29 0 99 60
wtforms.widgets.core.Select.__call__ wtforms.widgets.core 3 ['N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A'] 3 0 6 3 4 20 0 66 60
flask.sessions.SecureCookieSessionInterface.save_session flask.sessions 4 ['N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A'] 2 0 5 4 5 19 0 63 54
flask.cli.routes_command flask.cli 2 ['N/A', 'N/A'] 1 0 13 3 4 19 1 61 49
flask.cli.FlaskGroup.get_command flask.cli 3 ['N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A'] 2 0 3 2 4 14 0 47 44
wtforms.form.BaseForm.__init__ wtforms.form 4 ['N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A'] 5 0 2 3 4 21 0 68 44
flask.templating.DispatchingJinjaLoader._get_source_explained flask.templating 3 ['N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A'] 3 0 2 2 4 15 1 55 40

Implementing fuzzers that target the above functions will improve reachability such that it becomes:

Functions statically reachable by fuzzers
15.0%
89 / 589
Cyclomatic complexity statically reachable by fuzzers
17.0%
341 / 1975

All functions overview

If you implement fuzzers for these functions, the status of all functions in the project will be:

Func name Functions filename Args Function call depth Reached by Fuzzers Runtime reached by Fuzzers Combined reached by Fuzzers Fuzzers runtime hit Func lines hit % I Count BB Count Cyclomatic complexity Functions reached Reached by functions Accumulated cyclomatic complexity Undiscovered complexity

Fuzz engine guidance

This sections provides heuristics that can be used as input to a fuzz engine when running a given fuzz target. The current focus is on providing input that is usable by libFuzzer.

/src/fuzz_flask_wtf.py

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag


Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name 

-focus_function=['...fuzz_flask_wtf.fuzz_csrf', 'flask_wtf.i18n._get_translations', 'flask_wtf.i18n.Translations.gettext', 'flask_wtf.csrf.generate_csrf', 'flask.app.Flask.__init__', 'flask.app.Flask.test_request_context', 'flask.testing.EnvironBuilder.__init__']

Runtime coverage analysis

This section shows analysis of runtime coverage data.

For futher technical details on how this section is generated, please see the Glossary .

Complex functions with low coverage

Func name Function total lines Lines covered at runtime percentage covered Reached by fuzzers
flask.app.Flask.run 31 0 0.0% []
flask.app.Flask.make_response 33 0 0.0% []
flask.cli.find_app_by_string 34 0 0.0% []
flask.cli.routes_command 32 1 3.125% ['fuzz_flask_wtf']
werkzeug.wsgi.get_host 227 60 26.43% ['fuzz_flask_wtf']
werkzeug.serving.run_simple 490 89 18.16% ['fuzz_flask_wtf']
re.sub 378 141 37.30% ['fuzz_flask_wtf']
o.__html__ 181 55 30.38% ['fuzz_flask_wtf']
data.items 137 38 27.73% ['fuzz_flask_wtf']
werkzeug.utils.cached_property 245 70 28.57% ['fuzz_flask_wtf']
headers.append 286 138 48.25% ['fuzz_flask_wtf']
flask.sansio.blueprints.Blueprint.register 49 0 0.0% []
s.strip 731 86 11.76% ['fuzz_flask_wtf']
werkzeug.test.Client._new_contexts.pop 622 287 46.14% ['fuzz_flask_wtf']
response.set_cookie 264 115 43.56% ['fuzz_flask_wtf']
markupsafe.escape 182 73 40.10% ['fuzz_flask_wtf']
werkzeug.http.parse_date 453 95 20.97% ['fuzz_flask_wtf']
types.ModuleType 438 174 39.72% ['fuzz_flask_wtf']
flask_babel.get_locale 288 88 30.55% ['fuzz_flask_wtf']
t.ungettext 280 100 35.71% ['fuzz_flask_wtf']
babel.numbers.format_decimal 446 77 17.26% ['fuzz_flask_wtf']
filters.get 526 155 29.46% ['fuzz_flask_wtf']
g.get 140 27 19.28% ['fuzz_flask_wtf']

Files and Directories in report

This section shows which files and directories are considered in this report. The main reason for showing this is fuzz introspector may include more code in the reasoning than is desired. This section helps identify if too many files/directories are included, e.g. third party code, which may be irrelevant for the threat model. In the event too much is included, fuzz introspector supports a configuration file that can exclude data from the report. See the following link for more information on how to create a config file: link

Files in report

Source file Reached by Covered by
[] []
flask.sessions [] []
pathlib [] []
werkzeug [] []
flask.cli [] []
flask_wtf.file [] []
base64 [] []
wtforms.i18n ['fuzz_flask_wtf'] []
re [] []
contextlib [] []
importlib_metadata [] []
weakref [] []
flask.logging [] []
hashlib [] []
functools [] []
flask.app ['fuzz_flask_wtf'] []
traceback [] []
flask_wtf.recaptcha.validators [] []
flask_wtf.i18n ['fuzz_flask_wtf'] []
dotenv [] []
code [] []
flask.json [] []
atheris [] []
wtforms [] []
flask.sansio.scaffold [] []
json [] []
flask_wtf.recaptcha.widgets [] []
itsdangerous [] []
click [] []
wtforms.fields.numeric [] []
wtforms.fields.core [] []
sys [] []
flask.testing ['fuzz_flask_wtf'] []
wtforms.fields [] []
urllib [] []
hmac [] []
flask.ctx ['fuzz_flask_wtf'] []
wtforms.fields.simple [] []
wtforms.fields.datetime [] []
ipaddress [] []
wtforms.fields.choices [] []
contextvars [] []
platform [] []
flask_wtf.recaptcha [] []
flask.json.tag [] []
inspect [] []
dataclasses [] []
rlcompleter [] []
flask_wtf.form [] []
math [] []
flask.json.provider [] []
wtforms.validators [] []
markupsafe [] []
wtforms.fields.form [] []
wtforms.widgets [] []
babel [] []
readline [] []
flask [] []
flask.blueprints [] []
wtforms.meta [] []
wtforms.fields.list [] []
operator [] []
jinja2 [] []
[] []
...fuzz_flask_wtf ['fuzz_flask_wtf'] []
flask.globals [] []
flask.typing [] []
flask.sansio.blueprints [] []
warnings [] []
blinker [] []
flask.helpers [] []
gettext [] []
collections [] []
decimal [] []
wtforms.csrf.session [] []
flask.debughelpers [] []
wtforms.csrf [] []
uuid [] []
ast [] []
types [] []
flask.config [] []
wtforms.form [] []
flask_wtf._compat [] []
wtforms.utils [] []
asgiref [] []
wtforms.widgets.core [] []
flask_wtf [] []
flask.__main__ [] []
flask_wtf.recaptcha.fields [] []
datetime [] []
flask.sansio.app ['fuzz_flask_wtf'] []
logging [] []
flask_wtf.csrf ['fuzz_flask_wtf'] []
flask_babel [] []
flask.signals [] []
typing [] []
wtforms.csrf.core [] []
os [] []
email_validator [] []
importlib [] []
copy [] []
flask.views [] []
flask.templating [] []
itertools [] []
flask.wrappers [] []

Directories in report

Directory

Metadata section

This sections shows the raw data that is used to produce this report. This is mainly used for further processing and developer debugging.

Fuzzer Calltree file Program data file Coverage file
fuzz_flask_wtf fuzzerLogFile-fuzz_flask_wtf.data fuzzerLogFile-fuzz_flask_wtf.data.yaml all_cov.json