Fuzz introspector
For issues and ideas: https://github.com/ossf/fuzz-introspector/issues
Report generation date: 2024-12-17

Project overview: httpx

High level conclusions

Reachability and coverage overview

Functions statically reachable by fuzzers
4.0%
16 / 417
Cyclomatic complexity statically reachable by fuzzers
5.0%
66 / 1363
Runtime code coverage of functions
19.0%
80 / 417

Warning: The number of runtime covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that Fuzz Introspector found there are more functions covered at runtime than what is considered reachable based on the static analysis. This is a limitation in the analysis as anything covered at runtime is by definition reachable by the fuzzers.
This is likely due to a limitation in the static analysis. In this case, the count of functions covered at runtime is the true value, which means this is what should be considered "achieved" by the fuzzer.

Use the project functions table below to query all functions that were not covered at runtime.

Fuzzer details

Fuzzer: fuzz_decoders

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is
Color Runtime hitcount Callsite count Percentage
red 0 14 42.4%
gold [1:9] 0 0.0%
yellow [10:29] 0 0.0%
greenyellow [30:49] 0 0.0%
lawngreen 50+ 19 57.5%
All colors 33 100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked Calltree index Parent function Callsite Largest blocked function
7 25 httpx._decoders.TextChunker.decode call site: 00025 httpx._decoders.TextDecoder.__init__
2 5 ...fuzz_decoders.TestOneInput call site: 00005 .len
2 8 httpx._decoders.ByteChunker.decode call site: 00008 fdp.ConsumeIntInRange
2 22 ...fuzz_decoders.TestOneInput call site: 00022 .len
1 0 EP call site: 00000 atheris.FuzzedDataProvider

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions
109
Functions that are reachable but not covered
15
Reachable functions
21
Percentage of reachable functions covered
28.57%
NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.
Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.
Function name source code lines source lines hit percentage hit

Files reached

filename functions hit
/ 1
...fuzz_decoders 12
httpx._decoders 8

Fuzzer: fuzz_api

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is
Color Runtime hitcount Callsite count Percentage
red 0 5 62.5%
gold [1:9] 0 0.0%
yellow [10:29] 0 0.0%
greenyellow [30:49] 0 0.0%
lawngreen 50+ 3 37.5%
All colors 8 100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked Calltree index Parent function Callsite Largest blocked function
4 3 ...fuzz_api.ServerThread.__init__ call site: 00003 threading.Thread.start
1 0 EP call site: 00000 ...fuzz_api.ServerThread.__init__

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions
109
Functions that are reachable but not covered
7
Reachable functions
8
Percentage of reachable functions covered
12.5%
NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.
Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.
Function name source code lines source lines hit percentage hit

Files reached

filename functions hit
/ 1
...fuzz_api 7

Fuzzer: fuzz_url

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is
Color Runtime hitcount Callsite count Percentage
red 0 47 55.2%
gold [1:9] 0 0.0%
yellow [10:29] 0 0.0%
greenyellow [30:49] 0 0.0%
lawngreen 50+ 38 44.7%
All colors 85 100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked Calltree index Parent function Callsite Largest blocked function
16 34 httpx._urlparse.urlparse call site: 00034 kwargs.get
7 26 httpx._urlparse.quote call site: 00026 httpx._urlparse.quote
5 10 httpx._urlparse.urlparse call site: 00010 urllib.parse.urljoin.find
3 17 httpx._urlparse.urlparse call site: 00017 re.finditer
3 65 httpx._urlparse.encode_host call site: 00065 httpx._urlparse.quote
3 74 httpx._urlparse.validate_path call site: 00074 httpx._urlparse.normalize_path
3 78 httpx._urlparse.normalize_path call site: 00078 httpx._urlparse.quote
2 55 httpx._urlparse.urlparse call site: 00055 kwargs.get
1 23 httpx._urlparse.percent_encoded call site: 00023 httpx._urlparse.PERCENT
1 53 httpx._urlparse.urlparse call site: 00053 AUTHORITY_REGEX.match
1 61 httpx._urlparse.urlparse call site: 00061 IPv4_STYLE_HOSTNAME.match
1 63 httpx._urlparse.encode_host call site: 00063 IPv6_STYLE_HOSTNAME.match

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions
108
Functions that are reachable but not covered
42
Reachable functions
52
Percentage of reachable functions covered
19.23%
NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.
Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.
Function name source code lines source lines hit percentage hit

Files reached

filename functions hit
/ 1
...fuzz_url 3
httpx._urlparse 48

Analyses and suggestions

Optimal target analysis

Remaining optimal interesting functions

The following table shows a list of functions that are optimal targets. Optimal targets are identified by finding the functions that in combination, yield a high code coverage.

Func name Functions filename Arg count Args Function depth hitcount instr count bb count cyclomatic complexity Reachable functions Incoming references total cyclomatic complexity Unreached complexity
httpx._client.AsyncClient.send httpx._client 5 ['N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A'] 7 0 4 2 4 237 9 772 598
httpx._main.main httpx._main 17 ['N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A'] 6 0 7 3 4 136 0 446 182
httpx._auth.DigestAuth.auth_flow httpx._auth 2 ['N/A', 'N/A'] 3 0 2 4 5 43 0 139 80
httpx._main.trace httpx._main 3 ['N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A'] 4 0 10 8 6 26 0 85 67
httpx._transports.asgi.ASGITransport.handle_async_request httpx._transports.asgi 2 ['N/A', 'N/A'] 8 0 2 3 4 95 0 302 37
httpx._client.Client.send httpx._client 5 ['N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A'] 7 0 4 2 4 228 9 742 36

Implementing fuzzers that target the above functions will improve reachability such that it becomes:

Functions statically reachable by fuzzers
35.0%
147 / 417
Cyclomatic complexity statically reachable by fuzzers
39.0%
528 / 1363

All functions overview

If you implement fuzzers for these functions, the status of all functions in the project will be:

Func name Functions filename Args Function call depth Reached by Fuzzers Fuzzers runtime hit Func lines hit % I Count BB Count Cyclomatic complexity Functions reached Reached by functions Accumulated cyclomatic complexity Undiscovered complexity

Files and Directories in report

This section shows which files and directories are considered in this report. The main reason for showing this is fuzz introspector may include more code in the reasoning than is desired. This section helps identify if too many files/directories are included, e.g. third party code, which may be irrelevant for the threat model. In the event too much is included, fuzz introspector supports a configuration file that can exclude data from the report. See the following link for more information on how to create a config file: link

Files in report

Source file Reached by Covered by
[] []
sniffio [] []
httpx._decoders ['fuzz_decoders'] []
io [] []
[] []
httpx._utils [] []
datetime [] []
mimetypes [] []
inspect [] []
httpx._transports.mock [] []
click [] []
httpx._status_codes [] []
zstandard [] []
httpx._client [] []
logging [] []
json [] []
urllib [] []
typing [] []
pathlib [] []
httpx._exceptions [] []
httpx._transports.base [] []
httpx._urlparse ['fuzz_url'] []
threading [] []
httpx._transports [] []
trio [] []
httpx._api [] []
collections [] []
httpx._models [] []
httpx._auth [] []
idna [] []
asyncio [] []
...fuzz_api ['fuzz_api'] []
ssl [] []
httpx._transports.asgi [] []
certifi [] []
re [] []
base64 [] []
os [] []
httpx._transports.default [] []
ipaddress [] []
brotlicffi [] []
httpx._transports.wsgi [] []
...fuzz_decoders ['fuzz_decoders'] []
warnings [] []
httpx [] []
brotli [] []
codecs [] []
itertools [] []
zlib [] []
httpx._config [] []
hashlib [] []
sys [] []
httpx._multipart [] []
...fuzz_url ['fuzz_url'] []
httpx._content [] []
httpx._types [] []
httpx._main [] []
socket [] []
httpcore [] []
http [] []
netrc [] []
atheris [] []
httpx._urls [] []
httpx.__version__ [] []
time [] []

Directories in report

Directory