High level conclusions

Fuzzers reach 96.32% code coverage.

Fuzzers reach 77.33% of cyclomatic complexity.

Fuzzers reach 61.33% of all functions.

Fuzzer lua_stringtonumber_test is blocked:

The runtime code coverage of lua_stringtonumber_test covers 19.83% of its statically reachable code. This means there is some place that blocks the fuzzer to continue exploring more code at run time.

Reachability and coverage overview

Functions statically reachable by fuzzers

817 / 1332

Cyclomatic complexity statically reachable by fuzzers

10239 / 13239

Runtime code coverage of functions

1283 / 1332

Warning: The number of runtime covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that Fuzz Introspector found there are more functions covered at runtime than what is considered reachable based on the static analysis. This is a limitation in the analysis as anything covered at runtime is by definition reachable by the fuzzers.
This is likely due to a limitation in the static analysis. In this case, the count of functions covered at runtime is the true value, which means this is what should be considered "achieved" by the fuzzer.

Use the project functions table below to query all functions that were not covered at runtime.

The following table shows data about each function in the project. The functions included in this table correspond to all functions that exist in the executables of the fuzzers. As such, there may be functions that are from third-party libraries.

For further technical details on the meaning of columns in the below table, please see the Glossary .

Func name	Functions filename	Args	Function call depth	Reached by Fuzzers	Runtime reached by Fuzzers	Combined reached by Fuzzers	Fuzzers runtime hit	Func lines hit %	I Count	BB Count	Cyclomatic complexity	Functions reached	Reached by functions	Accumulated cyclomatic complexity	Undiscovered complexity

Fuzzer: luaL_gsub_test

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is

Color	Runtime hitcount	Callsite count	Percentage
red	0	3685	73.2%
gold	[1:9]	0	0.0%
yellow	[10:29]	0	0.0%
greenyellow	[30:49]	0	0.0%
lawngreen	50+	1344	26.7%
All colors	5029	100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked	Calltree index	Parent function	Callsite	Largest blocked function
745	3517	luaF_newtbcupval	call site: 03517	luaG_traceexec
643	2858	luaH_new	call site: 02858	luaH_resize
207	1925	luaS_new	call site: 01925	luaG_runerror
184	2665	luaV_finishset	call site: 02665	luaG_typeerror
157	1757	luaD_precall	call site: 01757	luaD_growstack
123	1370	luaD_callnoyield	call site: 01370	luaE_checkcstack
123	1505	luaS_newlstr	call site: 01505	luaD_throw
114	4548	newbuffsize	call site: 04548	luaL_error
94	2311	getgeneric	call site: 02311	luaG_runerror
87	580	genlink	call site: 00580	traverseephemeron
87	1204	checkmajorminor	call site: 01204	atomic2gen
81	669	traversetable	call site: 00669	traverseproto

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions

191

Functions that are reachable but not covered

244

Reachable functions

431

Percentage of reachable functions covered

43.39%

NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.

Function name	source code lines	source lines hit	percentage hit

Files reached

filename	functions hit
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_gsub_test.cc	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lauxlib.c	24
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstate.c	19
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lobject.c	21
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldo.c	27
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lmem.c	5
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lgc.c	74
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltable.c	57
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lfunc.c	15
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstring.c	19
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltm.c	17
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldebug.c	42
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lvm.c	29
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lopcodes.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/llex.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lapi.c	35

Fuzzer: luaL_traceback_test

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is

Color	Runtime hitcount	Callsite count	Percentage
red	0	3804	74.0%
gold	[1:9]	1	0.01%
yellow	[10:29]	0	0.0%
greenyellow	[30:49]	12	0.23%
lawngreen	50+	1320	25.6%
All colors	5137	100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked	Calltree index	Parent function	Callsite	Largest blocked function
745	3517	luaF_newtbcupval	call site: 03517	luaG_traceexec
643	2858	luaH_new	call site: 02858	luaH_resize
207	1925	luaS_new	call site: 01925	luaG_runerror
184	2665	luaV_finishset	call site: 02665	luaG_typeerror
157	1757	luaD_precall	call site: 01757	luaD_growstack
123	1369	luaD_callnoyield	call site: 01369	luaE_checkcstack
123	1504	luaS_newlstr	call site: 01504	luaD_throw
115	4937	luaL_traceback	call site: 04937	luaL_addvalue
113	4538	newbuffsize	call site: 04538	luaL_error
94	2311	getgeneric	call site: 02311	luaG_runerror
87	579	genlink	call site: 00579	traverseephemeron
87	1203	checkmajorminor	call site: 01203	atomic2gen

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions

191

Functions that are reachable but not covered

256

Reachable functions

443

Percentage of reachable functions covered

42.21%

NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.

Function name	source code lines	source lines hit	percentage hit

Files reached

filename	functions hit
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_traceback_test.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lauxlib.c	29
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstate.c	19
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lobject.c	21
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldo.c	27
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lmem.c	5
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lgc.c	74
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltable.c	59
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lfunc.c	15
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstring.c	19
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltm.c	17
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldebug.c	42
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lvm.c	29
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lopcodes.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/llex.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lapi.c	40

Fuzzer: luaL_addgsub_test

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is

Color	Runtime hitcount	Callsite count	Percentage
red	0	3688	73.4%
gold	[1:9]	0	0.0%
yellow	[10:29]	0	0.0%
greenyellow	[30:49]	0	0.0%
lawngreen	50+	1336	26.5%
All colors	5024	100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked	Calltree index	Parent function	Callsite	Largest blocked function
745	3519	luaF_newtbcupval	call site: 03519	luaG_traceexec
643	2860	luaH_new	call site: 02860	luaH_resize
207	1927	luaS_new	call site: 01927	luaG_runerror
184	2667	luaV_finishset	call site: 02667	luaG_typeerror
157	1759	luaD_precall	call site: 01759	luaD_growstack
123	1371	luaD_callnoyield	call site: 01371	luaE_checkcstack
123	1506	luaS_newlstr	call site: 01506	luaD_throw
114	4531	newbuffsize	call site: 04531	luaL_error
94	2313	getgeneric	call site: 02313	luaG_runerror
87	581	genlink	call site: 00581	traverseephemeron
87	1205	checkmajorminor	call site: 01205	atomic2gen
81	670	traversetable	call site: 00670	traverseproto

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions

188

Functions that are reachable but not covered

245

Reachable functions

429

Percentage of reachable functions covered

42.89%

NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.

Function name	source code lines	source lines hit	percentage hit

Files reached

filename	functions hit
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_addgsub_test.cc	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lauxlib.c	23
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstate.c	19
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lobject.c	21
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldo.c	27
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lmem.c	5
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lgc.c	74
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltable.c	57
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lfunc.c	15
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstring.c	19
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltm.c	17
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldebug.c	42
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lvm.c	29
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lopcodes.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/llex.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lapi.c	34

Fuzzer: luaL_bufflen_test

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is

Color	Runtime hitcount	Callsite count	Percentage
red	0	3689	73.6%
gold	[1:9]	0	0.0%
yellow	[10:29]	0	0.0%
greenyellow	[30:49]	12	0.23%
lawngreen	50+	1309	26.1%
All colors	5010	100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked	Calltree index	Parent function	Callsite	Largest blocked function
745	3519	luaF_newtbcupval	call site: 03519	luaG_traceexec
643	2860	luaH_new	call site: 02860	luaH_resize
207	1927	luaS_new	call site: 01927	luaG_runerror
184	2667	luaV_finishset	call site: 02667	luaG_typeerror
157	1759	luaD_precall	call site: 01759	luaD_growstack
123	1371	luaD_callnoyield	call site: 01371	luaE_checkcstack
123	1506	luaS_newlstr	call site: 01506	luaD_throw
114	4529	newbuffsize	call site: 04529	luaL_error
94	2313	getgeneric	call site: 02313	luaG_runerror
87	581	genlink	call site: 00581	traverseephemeron
87	1205	checkmajorminor	call site: 01205	atomic2gen
81	670	traversetable	call site: 00670	traverseproto

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions

187

Functions that are reachable but not covered

244

Reachable functions

427

Percentage of reachable functions covered

42.86%

NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.

Function name	source code lines	source lines hit	percentage hit

Files reached

filename	functions hit
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_bufflen_test.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lauxlib.c	22
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstate.c	19
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lobject.c	21
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldo.c	27
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lmem.c	5
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lgc.c	74
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltable.c	57
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lfunc.c	15
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstring.c	19
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltm.c	17
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldebug.c	42
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lvm.c	29
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lopcodes.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/llex.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lapi.c	34

Fuzzer: lua_dump_test

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is

Color	Runtime hitcount	Callsite count	Percentage
red	0	3378	47.3%
gold	[1:9]	35	0.49%
yellow	[10:29]	24	0.33%
greenyellow	[30:49]	29	0.40%
lawngreen	50+	3671	51.4%
All colors	7137	100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked	Calltree index	Parent function	Callsite	Largest blocked function
467	3066	luaV_tointegerns	call site: 03066	luaG_traceexec
387	3551	luaV_equalobj	call site: 03551	luaT_callTMres
271	1643	luaD_reallocstack	call site: 01643	luaD_reallocstack
173	4628	luaF_newproto	call site: 04628	loadFunction
159	2858	luaH_new	call site: 02858	luaH_resize
157	3968	luaO_str2num	call site: 03968	luaG_forerror
137	1995	luaP_isIT	call site: 01995	luaD_hook
127	4132	luaF_newLclosure	call site: 04132	luaF_findupval
112	2737	luaH_pset	call site: 02737	luaG_runerror
93	2312	luaH_get	call site: 02312	luaG_runerror
87	579	genlink	call site: 00579	traverseephemeron
87	1203	checkmajorminor	call site: 01203	atomic2gen

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions

476

Functions that are reachable but not covered

206

Reachable functions

676

Percentage of reachable functions covered

69.53%

NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.

Function name	source code lines	source lines hit	percentage hit

Files reached

filename	functions hit
/src/testdir/tests/capi/lua_dump_test.c	2
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lauxlib.c	12
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstate.c	20
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lobject.c	24
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldo.c	31
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lmem.c	8
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lgc.c	71
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltable.c	56
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lfunc.c	16
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstring.c	18
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltm.c	17
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldebug.c	35
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lvm.c	29
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lopcodes.c	2
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/llex.c	25
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lapi.c	9
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lzio.c	5
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lundump.c	23
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lparser.c	107
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lcode.c	108
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldump.c	17

Fuzzer: luaL_loadbufferx_test

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is

Color	Runtime hitcount	Callsite count	Percentage
red	0	3376	48.1%
gold	[1:9]	26	0.37%
yellow	[10:29]	15	0.21%
greenyellow	[30:49]	29	0.41%
lawngreen	50+	3572	50.8%
All colors	7018	100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked	Calltree index	Parent function	Callsite	Largest blocked function
467	3066	luaV_tointegerns	call site: 03066	luaG_traceexec
387	3551	luaV_equalobj	call site: 03551	luaT_callTMres
271	1643	luaD_reallocstack	call site: 01643	luaD_reallocstack
173	4622	luaF_newproto	call site: 04622	loadFunction
159	2858	luaH_new	call site: 02858	luaH_resize
157	3968	luaO_str2num	call site: 03968	luaG_forerror
137	1995	luaP_isIT	call site: 01995	luaD_hook
127	4132	luaF_newLclosure	call site: 04132	luaF_findupval
112	2737	luaH_pset	call site: 02737	luaG_runerror
93	2312	luaH_get	call site: 02312	luaG_runerror
87	579	genlink	call site: 00579	traverseephemeron
87	1203	checkmajorminor	call site: 01203	atomic2gen

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions

459

Functions that are reachable but not covered

203

Reachable functions

656

Percentage of reachable functions covered

69.05%

NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.

Function name	source code lines	source lines hit	percentage hit

Files reached

filename	functions hit
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_loadbufferx_test.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lauxlib.c	11
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstate.c	20
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lobject.c	24
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldo.c	31
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lmem.c	8
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lgc.c	71
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltable.c	56
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lfunc.c	16
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstring.c	18
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltm.c	17
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldebug.c	35
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lvm.c	29
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lopcodes.c	2
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/llex.c	25
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lapi.c	8
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lzio.c	5
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lundump.c	23
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lparser.c	107
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lcode.c	108

Fuzzer: luaL_buffsub_test

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is

Color	Runtime hitcount	Callsite count	Percentage
red	0	3687	73.5%
gold	[1:9]	0	0.0%
yellow	[10:29]	0	0.0%
greenyellow	[30:49]	0	0.0%
lawngreen	50+	1325	26.4%
All colors	5012	100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked	Calltree index	Parent function	Callsite	Largest blocked function
745	3519	luaF_newtbcupval	call site: 03519	luaG_traceexec
643	2860	luaH_new	call site: 02860	luaH_resize
207	1927	luaS_new	call site: 01927	luaG_runerror
184	2667	luaV_finishset	call site: 02667	luaG_typeerror
157	1759	luaD_precall	call site: 01759	luaD_growstack
123	1371	luaD_callnoyield	call site: 01371	luaE_checkcstack
123	1506	luaS_newlstr	call site: 01506	luaD_throw
114	4529	newbuffsize	call site: 04529	luaL_error
94	2313	getgeneric	call site: 02313	luaG_runerror
87	581	genlink	call site: 00581	traverseephemeron
87	1205	checkmajorminor	call site: 01205	atomic2gen
81	670	traversetable	call site: 00670	traverseproto

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions

186

Functions that are reachable but not covered

244

Reachable functions

426

Percentage of reachable functions covered

42.72%

NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.

Function name	source code lines	source lines hit	percentage hit

Files reached

filename	functions hit
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_buffsub_test.cc	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lauxlib.c	21
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstate.c	19
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lobject.c	21
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldo.c	27
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lmem.c	5
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lgc.c	74
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltable.c	57
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lfunc.c	15
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstring.c	19
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltm.c	17
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldebug.c	42
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lvm.c	29
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lopcodes.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/llex.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lapi.c	34

Fuzzer: fuzz_lua

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is

Color	Runtime hitcount	Callsite count	Percentage
red	0	2719	35.4%
gold	[1:9]	351	4.57%
yellow	[10:29]	191	2.48%
greenyellow	[30:49]	112	1.45%
lawngreen	50+	4305	56.0%
All colors	7678	100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked	Calltree index	Parent function	Callsite	Largest blocked function
129	3796	luaV_execute	call site: 03796	luaD_pretailcall
87	579	genlink	call site: 00579	traverseephemeron
87	1203	checkmajorminor	call site: 01203	atomic2gen
84	7465	pushfuncname	call site: 07465	pushglobalfuncname
81	4714	luaS_newextlstr	call site: 04714	loadProtos
79	4622	luaF_newproto	call site: 04622	loadFunction
69	2868	luaV_execute	call site: 02868	youngcollection
63	4017	luaV_execute	call site: 04017	luaF_newtbcupval
62	4530	checkmode	call site: 04530	luaU_undump
60	4167	luaV_execute	call site: 04167	luaT_getvarargs
50	6547	checktoclose	call site: 06547	globalstatfunc
49	3551	luaV_equalobj	call site: 03551	luaT_callTMres

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions

572

Functions that are reachable but not covered

184

Reachable functions

749

Percentage of reachable functions covered

75.43%

NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.

Function name	source code lines	source lines hit	percentage hit

Files reached

filename	functions hit
/src/fuzz_lua.c	8
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lauxlib.c	33
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstate.c	20
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lobject.c	24
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldo.c	31
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lmem.c	8
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lgc.c	74
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltable.c	59
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lfunc.c	17
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstring.c	19
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltm.c	17
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldebug.c	44
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lvm.c	29
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lopcodes.c	2
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/llex.c	25
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lapi.c	50
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lzio.c	5
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lundump.c	23
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lparser.c	107
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lcode.c	108

Fuzzer: lua_stringtonumber_test

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is

Color	Runtime hitcount	Callsite count	Percentage
red	0	4094	90.1%
gold	[1:9]	0	0.0%
yellow	[10:29]	0	0.0%
greenyellow	[30:49]	6	0.13%
lawngreen	50+	439	9.67%
All colors	4539	100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked	Calltree index	Parent function	Callsite	Largest blocked function
1080	2858	luaH_new	call site: 02858	luaH_resize
649	1925	luaS_new	call site: 01925	luaG_runerror
615	1299	callallpendingfinalizers	call site: 01299	GCTM
399	436	freeobj	call site: 00436	entergen
289	3973	luaV_tonumber_	call site: 03973	luaG_forerror
204	2645	luaH_resize	call site: 02645	luaH_newkey
145	1152	separatetobefnz	call site: 01152	propagateall
118	1030	internshrstr	call site: 01030	luaM_toobig
101	284	luaF_closeupval	call site: 00284	luaC_barrier_
76	4268	luaH_setint	call site: 04268	luaH_newkey
70	857	luaF_close	call site: 00857	prepcallclosemth
44	198	luaM_free_	call site: 00198	freeupval

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions

73

Functions that are reachable but not covered

295

Reachable functions

368

Percentage of reachable functions covered

19.84%

NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.

Function name	source code lines	source lines hit	percentage hit

Files reached

filename	functions hit
/src/testdir/tests/capi/lua_stringtonumber_test.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lauxlib.c	9
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstate.c	19
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lobject.c	21
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldo.c	27
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lmem.c	5
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lgc.c	71
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltable.c	53
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lfunc.c	14
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstring.c	16
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltm.c	17
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldebug.c	35
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lvm.c	29
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lopcodes.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/llex.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lapi.c	9

Fuzzer: lua_load_test

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is

Color	Runtime hitcount	Callsite count	Percentage
red	0	964	13.3%
gold	[1:9]	63	0.87%
yellow	[10:29]	39	0.54%
greenyellow	[30:49]	73	1.01%
lawngreen	50+	6081	84.2%
All colors	7220	100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked	Calltree index	Parent function	Callsite	Largest blocked function
80	4910	luaS_newextlstr	call site: 04910	loadProtos
76	4820	luaF_newproto	call site: 04820	loadFunction
41	3551	luaV_equalobj	call site: 03551	luaT_callTMres
40	4187	luaV_execute	call site: 04187	luaG_traceexec
31	2669	luaV_finishset	call site: 02669	luaT_callTM
23	3812	luaD_pretailcall	call site: 03812	precallC
21	2289	equalkey	call site: 02289	luaS_eqstr
20	669	traversetable	call site: 00669	traverseudata
20	1120	atomic	call site: 01120	iscleared
18	582	genlink	call site: 00582	traverseweakvalue
18	2520	luaH_finishset	call site: 02520	luaS_normstr
18	6717	globalstatfunc	call site: 06717	globalfunc

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions

931

Functions that are reachable but not covered

78

Reachable functions

678

Percentage of reachable functions covered

88.5%

NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.

Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.

Function name	source code lines	source lines hit	percentage hit

Files reached

filename	functions hit
/src/testdir/tests/capi/lua_load_test.cc	2
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lauxlib.c	11
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstate.c	20
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lobject.c	24
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldo.c	31
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lmem.c	8
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lgc.c	71
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltable.c	57
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lfunc.c	17
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstring.c	18
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltm.c	17
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldebug.c	35
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lvm.c	29
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lopcodes.c	2
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/llex.c	25
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lapi.c	25
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/linit.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lzio.c	5
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lundump.c	23
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lparser.c	107
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lcode.c	108

Fuzzer: luaL_loadbuffer_test

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is

Color	Runtime hitcount	Callsite count	Percentage
red	0	519	7.19%
gold	[1:9]	98	1.35%
yellow	[10:29]	14	0.19%
greenyellow	[30:49]	8	0.11%
lawngreen	50+	6577	91.1%
All colors	7216	100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked	Calltree index	Parent function	Callsite	Largest blocked function
41	3551	luaV_equalobj	call site: 03551	luaT_callTMres
27	4187	luaV_execute	call site: 04187	luaG_traceexec
21	2289	equalkey	call site: 02289	luaS_eqstr
20	668	traversetable	call site: 00668	traverseudata
18	581	genlink	call site: 00581	traverseweakvalue
18	2520	luaH_finishset	call site: 02520	luaS_normstr
15	4244	luaT_adjustvarargs	call site: 04244	createvarargtab
13	605	iscleared	call site: 00605	genlink
13	964	luaC_fullgc	call site: 00964	luaD_throw
13	2054	luaV_execute	call site: 02054	luaG_traceexec
12	1447	addnum2buff	call site: 01447	addnum2buff
12	1935	typeerror	call site: 01935	luaG_runerror

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions

964

Functions that are reachable but not covered

53

Reachable functions

678

Percentage of reachable functions covered

92.18%

NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.

Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.

Function name	source code lines	source lines hit	percentage hit

Files reached

filename	functions hit
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_loadbuffer_test.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lauxlib.c	13
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstate.c	20
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lobject.c	24
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldo.c	31
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lmem.c	8
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lgc.c	71
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltable.c	57
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lfunc.c	17
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstring.c	18
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltm.c	17
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldebug.c	35
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lvm.c	29
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lopcodes.c	2
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/llex.c	25
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lapi.c	25
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/linit.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lzio.c	5
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lundump.c	23
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lparser.c	107
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lcode.c	108

Fuzzer: luaL_buffaddr_test

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is

Color	Runtime hitcount	Callsite count	Percentage
red	0	3689	73.6%
gold	[1:9]	0	0.0%
yellow	[10:29]	0	0.0%
greenyellow	[30:49]	12	0.23%
lawngreen	50+	1309	26.1%
All colors	5010	100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked	Calltree index	Parent function	Callsite	Largest blocked function
745	3519	luaF_newtbcupval	call site: 03519	luaG_traceexec
643	2860	luaH_new	call site: 02860	luaH_resize
207	1927	luaS_new	call site: 01927	luaG_runerror
184	2667	luaV_finishset	call site: 02667	luaG_typeerror
157	1759	luaD_precall	call site: 01759	luaD_growstack
123	1371	luaD_callnoyield	call site: 01371	luaE_checkcstack
123	1506	luaS_newlstr	call site: 01506	luaD_throw
114	4529	newbuffsize	call site: 04529	luaL_error
94	2313	getgeneric	call site: 02313	luaG_runerror
87	581	genlink	call site: 00581	traverseephemeron
87	1205	checkmajorminor	call site: 01205	atomic2gen
81	670	traversetable	call site: 00670	traverseproto

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions

187

Functions that are reachable but not covered

244

Reachable functions

427

Percentage of reachable functions covered

42.86%

NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.

Function name	source code lines	source lines hit	percentage hit

Files reached

filename	functions hit
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_buffaddr_test.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lauxlib.c	22
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstate.c	19
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lobject.c	21
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldo.c	27
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lmem.c	5
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lgc.c	74
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltable.c	57
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lfunc.c	15
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstring.c	19
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltm.c	17
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldebug.c	42
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lvm.c	29
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lopcodes.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/llex.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lapi.c	34

Fuzzer: luaL_dostring_test

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is

Color	Runtime hitcount	Callsite count	Percentage
red	0	601	8.32%
gold	[1:9]	77	1.06%
yellow	[10:29]	80	1.10%
greenyellow	[30:49]	54	0.74%
lawngreen	50+	6408	88.7%
All colors	7220	100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked	Calltree index	Parent function	Callsite	Largest blocked function
41	3551	luaV_equalobj	call site: 03551	luaT_callTMres
40	4187	luaV_execute	call site: 04187	luaG_traceexec
21	2289	equalkey	call site: 02289	luaS_eqstr
20	668	traversetable	call site: 00668	traverseudata
18	581	genlink	call site: 00581	traverseweakvalue
18	2520	luaH_finishset	call site: 02520	luaS_normstr
14	4245	luaT_adjustvarargs	call site: 04245	createvarargtab
13	605	iscleared	call site: 00605	genlink
13	964	luaC_fullgc	call site: 00964	luaD_throw
13	2054	luaV_execute	call site: 02054	luaG_traceexec
12	1447	addnum2buff	call site: 01447	addnum2buff
10	4849	loadAlign	call site: 04849	getaddr_

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions

1028

Functions that are reachable but not covered

55

Reachable functions

679

Percentage of reachable functions covered

91.9%

NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.

Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.

Function name	source code lines	source lines hit	percentage hit

Files reached

filename	functions hit
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_dostring_test.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lauxlib.c	14
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstate.c	20
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lobject.c	24
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldo.c	31
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lmem.c	8
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lgc.c	71
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltable.c	57
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lfunc.c	17
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstring.c	18
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltm.c	17
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldebug.c	35
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lvm.c	29
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lopcodes.c	2
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/llex.c	25
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lapi.c	25
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/linit.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lzio.c	5
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lundump.c	23
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lparser.c	107
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lcode.c	108

Fuzzer: torture_test

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is

Color	Runtime hitcount	Callsite count	Percentage
red	0	3003	61.4%
gold	[1:9]	196	4.01%
yellow	[10:29]	278	5.69%
greenyellow	[30:49]	133	2.72%
lawngreen	50+	1273	26.0%
All colors	4883	100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked	Calltree index	Parent function	Callsite	Largest blocked function
285	3066	luaV_tointegerns	call site: 03066	luaG_traceexec
260	3672	LEnum	call site: 03672	lessequalothers
200	2858	luaH_new	call site: 02858	luaH_resize
157	1757	luaD_precall	call site: 01757	luaD_growstack
149	3976	luaV_tonumber_	call site: 03976	luaG_forerror
137	1995	luaP_isIT	call site: 01995	luaD_hook
127	4132	luaF_newLclosure	call site: 04132	luaF_findupval
114	2735	luaH_pset	call site: 02735	luaG_runerror
93	2312	luaH_get	call site: 02312	luaG_runerror
87	579	genlink	call site: 00579	traverseephemeron
87	1203	checkmajorminor	call site: 01203	atomic2gen
68	1925	luaS_new	call site: 01925	luaG_runerror

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions

552

Functions that are reachable but not covered

167

Reachable functions

412

Percentage of reachable functions covered

59.47%

NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.

Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.

Function name	source code lines	source lines hit	percentage hit

Files reached

filename	functions hit
/src/testdir/tests/capi/torture_test.cc	5
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lauxlib.c	14
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstate.c	19
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lobject.c	21
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldo.c	27
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lmem.c	5
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lgc.c	74
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltable.c	57
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lfunc.c	15
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstring.c	16
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltm.c	17
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldebug.c	44
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lvm.c	29
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lopcodes.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/llex.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lapi.c	23

Fuzzer: luaL_loadstring_test

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is

Color	Runtime hitcount	Callsite count	Percentage
red	0	814	11.2%
gold	[1:9]	81	1.12%
yellow	[10:29]	116	1.60%
greenyellow	[30:49]	84	1.16%
lawngreen	50+	6125	84.8%
All colors	7220	100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked	Calltree index	Parent function	Callsite	Largest blocked function
41	3551	luaV_equalobj	call site: 03551	luaT_callTMres
40	4187	luaV_execute	call site: 04187	luaG_traceexec
21	1447	addnum2buff	call site: 01447	addnum2buff
21	2289	equalkey	call site: 02289	luaS_eqstr
20	668	traversetable	call site: 00668	traverseudata
18	581	genlink	call site: 00581	traverseweakvalue
18	2520	luaH_finishset	call site: 02520	luaS_normstr
18	6450	forstat	call site: 06450	repeatstat
16	2054	luaV_execute	call site: 02054	luaG_traceexec
15	4244	luaT_adjustvarargs	call site: 04244	createvarargtab
14	7200	f_call	call site: 07200	luaD_call
13	605	iscleared	call site: 00605	genlink

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions

952

Functions that are reachable but not covered

65

Reachable functions

679

Percentage of reachable functions covered

90.43%

NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.

Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.

Function name	source code lines	source lines hit	percentage hit

Files reached

filename	functions hit
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_loadstring_test.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lauxlib.c	14
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstate.c	20
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lobject.c	24
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldo.c	31
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lmem.c	8
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lgc.c	71
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltable.c	57
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lfunc.c	17
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstring.c	18
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltm.c	17
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldebug.c	35
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lvm.c	29
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lopcodes.c	2
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/llex.c	25
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lapi.c	25
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/linit.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lzio.c	5
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lundump.c	23
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lparser.c	107
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lcode.c	108

Fuzzer: luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is

Color	Runtime hitcount	Callsite count	Percentage
red	0	1104	14.8%
gold	[1:9]	18	0.24%
yellow	[10:29]	0	0.0%
greenyellow	[30:49]	41	0.55%
lawngreen	50+	6274	84.3%
All colors	7437	100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked	Calltree index	Parent function	Callsite	Largest blocked function
85	584	genlink	call site: 00584	traverseephemeron
80	5126	luaS_newextlstr	call site: 05126	loadProtos
76	5037	luaF_newproto	call site: 05037	loadFunction
41	3552	luaV_equalobj	call site: 03552	luaT_callTMres
28	2781	luaV_execute	call site: 02781	luaV_finishset
27	4188	luaV_execute	call site: 04188	luaG_traceexec
23	1670	precallC	call site: 01670	luaD_hook
23	2345	luaV_execute	call site: 02345	luaV_finishget
21	1084	remarkupvals	call site: 01084	reallymarkobject
21	2290	equalkey	call site: 02290	luaS_eqstr
20	671	traversetable	call site: 00671	traverseudata
20	1122	atomic	call site: 01122	iscleared

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions

3467

Functions that are reachable but not covered

97

Reachable functions

842

Percentage of reachable functions covered

88.48%

NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.

Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.

Function name	source code lines	source lines hit	percentage hit

Files reached

filename	functions hit
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_loadbuffer_proto/luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test.cc	5
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lauxlib.c	13
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstate.c	20
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lobject.c	24
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldo.c	31
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lmem.c	8
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lgc.c	71
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltable.c	57
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lfunc.c	17
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstring.c	18
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltm.c	17
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldebug.c	35
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lvm.c	29
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lopcodes.c	2
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/llex.c	25
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lapi.c	25
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_loadbuffer_proto/serializer.cc	75
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/linit.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lzio.c	5
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lundump.c	23
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lparser.c	107
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lcode.c	108

Optimal target analysis

Remaining optimal interesting functions

The following table shows a list of functions that are optimal targets. Optimal targets are identified by finding the functions that in combination, yield a high code coverage.

Func name	Functions filename	Arg count	Args	Function depth	hitcount	instr count	bb count	cyclomatic complexity	Reachable functions	Incoming references	total cyclomatic complexity	Unreached complexity
luaB_cowrap	/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lcorolib.c	1	['N/A']	208	0	17	3	2	400	0	5738	249
str_gsub	/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstrlib.c	1	['N/A']	173	0	418	57	18	451	0	6063	227
io_lines	/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/liolib.c	1	['N/A']	175	0	95	12	5	453	0	5998	153
str_format	/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstrlib.c	1	['N/A']	173	0	686	99	23	443	0	6010	135
luaB_loadfile	/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lbaselib.c	1	['N/A']	172	0	48	3	2	686	0	8237	116
sort	/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltablib.c	1	['N/A']	171	0	76	12	5	399	0	5607	110
searcher_Croot	/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/loadlib.c	1	['N/A']	174	0	105	12	6	446	0	5946	90
str_pack	/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstrlib.c	1	['N/A']	172	0	770	84	24	432	0	5936	83
__lua_getiuservalue(lua_State*,FuzzedDataProvider*)	/src/testdir/tests/capi/torture_test.cc	2	['N/A', 'N/A']	41	0	54	7	2	338	0	5025	68
db_sethook	/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldblib.c	1	['N/A']	173	0	164	16	7	404	0	5697	51

Implementing fuzzers that target the above functions will improve reachability such that it becomes:

Functions statically reachable by fuzzers

971 / 1332

Cyclomatic complexity statically reachable by fuzzers

11489 / 13239

All functions overview

If you implement fuzzers for these functions, the status of all functions in the project will be:

Func name	Functions filename	Args	Function call depth	Reached by Fuzzers	Runtime reached by Fuzzers	Combined reached by Fuzzers	Fuzzers runtime hit	Func lines hit %	I Count	BB Count	Cyclomatic complexity	Functions reached	Reached by functions	Accumulated cyclomatic complexity	Undiscovered complexity

This sections provides heuristics that can be used as input to a fuzz engine when running a given fuzz target. The current focus is on providing input that is usable by libFuzzer.

/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_gsub_test.cc

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag

Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['luaF_newtbcupval', 'luaH_new', 'luaS_new', 'luaV_finishset', 'luaD_precall', 'luaD_callnoyield', 'luaS_newlstr', 'newbuffsize', 'getgeneric', 'genlink']

/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_traceback_test.c

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag

Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['luaF_newtbcupval', 'luaH_new', 'luaS_new', 'luaV_finishset', 'luaD_precall', 'luaD_callnoyield', 'luaS_newlstr', 'luaL_traceback', 'newbuffsize', 'getgeneric']

/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_addgsub_test.cc

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag

Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['luaF_newtbcupval', 'luaH_new', 'luaS_new', 'luaV_finishset', 'luaD_precall', 'luaD_callnoyield', 'luaS_newlstr', 'newbuffsize', 'getgeneric', 'genlink']

/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_bufflen_test.c

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag

Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['luaF_newtbcupval', 'luaH_new', 'luaS_new', 'luaV_finishset', 'luaD_precall', 'luaD_callnoyield', 'luaS_newlstr', 'newbuffsize', 'getgeneric', 'genlink']

/src/testdir/tests/capi/lua_dump_test.c

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag

Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['luaV_tointegerns', 'luaV_equalobj', 'luaD_reallocstack', 'luaF_newproto', 'luaH_new', 'luaO_str2num', 'luaP_isIT', 'luaF_newLclosure', 'luaH_pset', 'luaH_get']

/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_loadbufferx_test.c

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag

Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['luaV_tointegerns', 'luaV_equalobj', 'luaD_reallocstack', 'luaF_newproto', 'luaH_new', 'luaO_str2num', 'luaP_isIT', 'luaF_newLclosure', 'luaH_pset', 'luaH_get']

/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_buffsub_test.cc

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag

Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['luaF_newtbcupval', 'luaH_new', 'luaS_new', 'luaV_finishset', 'luaD_precall', 'luaD_callnoyield', 'luaS_newlstr', 'newbuffsize', 'getgeneric', 'genlink']

/src/fuzz_lua.c

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag

Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['luaV_execute', 'genlink', 'checkmajorminor', 'pushfuncname', 'luaS_newextlstr', 'luaF_newproto', 'checkmode']

/src/testdir/tests/capi/lua_stringtonumber_test.c

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag

Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['luaH_new', 'luaS_new', 'callallpendingfinalizers', 'freeobj', 'luaV_tonumber_', 'luaH_resize', 'separatetobefnz', 'internshrstr', 'luaF_closeupval', 'luaH_setint']

/src/testdir/tests/capi/lua_load_test.cc

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag

Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['luaS_newextlstr', 'luaF_newproto', 'luaV_equalobj', 'luaV_execute', 'luaV_finishset', 'luaD_pretailcall', 'equalkey', 'traversetable', 'atomic', 'genlink']

/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_loadbuffer_test.c

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag

Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['luaV_equalobj', 'luaV_execute', 'equalkey', 'traversetable', 'genlink', 'luaH_finishset', 'luaT_adjustvarargs', 'iscleared', 'luaC_fullgc']

/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_buffaddr_test.c

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag

Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['luaF_newtbcupval', 'luaH_new', 'luaS_new', 'luaV_finishset', 'luaD_precall', 'luaD_callnoyield', 'luaS_newlstr', 'newbuffsize', 'getgeneric', 'genlink']

/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_dostring_test.c

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag

Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['luaV_equalobj', 'luaV_execute', 'equalkey', 'traversetable', 'genlink', 'luaH_finishset', 'luaT_adjustvarargs', 'iscleared', 'luaC_fullgc']

/src/testdir/tests/capi/torture_test.cc

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag

Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['luaV_tointegerns', 'LEnum', 'luaH_new', 'luaD_precall', 'luaV_tonumber_', 'luaP_isIT', 'luaF_newLclosure', 'luaH_pset', 'luaH_get', 'genlink']

/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_loadstring_test.c

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag

Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['luaV_equalobj', 'luaV_execute', 'addnum2buff', 'equalkey', 'traversetable', 'genlink', 'luaH_finishset', 'forstat', 'luaT_adjustvarargs']

/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_loadbuffer_proto/luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test.cc

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag

Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['genlink', 'luaS_newextlstr', 'luaF_newproto', 'luaV_equalobj', 'luaV_execute', 'precallC', 'remarkupvals', 'equalkey']

This section shows analysis of runtime coverage data.

For futher technical details on how this section is generated, please see the Glossary .

Complex functions with low coverage

Func name	Function total lines	Lines covered at runtime	percentage covered	Reached by fuzzers
luaV_finishOp	54	18	33.33%	['lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_dostring_test']
byteoffset	46	23	50.0%	['luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']
google::protobuf::DescriptorBuilder::AddSymbol(std::__1::basic_string ,std::__1::allocator >const&,voidconst*,std::__1::basic_string ,std::__1::allocator >const&,google::protobuf::Messageconst&,google::protobuf::Symbol)	40	8	20.0%
google::protobuf::DescriptorBuilder::BuildFile(google::protobuf::FileDescriptorProtoconst&)	49	21	42.85%
google::protobuf::DescriptorBuilder::BuildFileImpl(google::protobuf::FileDescriptorProtoconst&,google::protobuf::internal::FlatAllocator&)	201	79	39.30%
google::protobuf::DescriptorBuilder::BuildMessage(google::protobuf::DescriptorProtoconst&,google::protobuf::Descriptorconst*,google::protobuf::Descriptor*,google::protobuf::internal::FlatAllocator&)	135	68	50.37%
google::protobuf::DescriptorBuilder::BuildFieldOrExtension(google::protobuf::FieldDescriptorProtoconst&,google::protobuf::Descriptor*,google::protobuf::FieldDescriptor*,bool,google::protobuf::internal::FlatAllocator&)	232	103	44.39%
google::protobuf::DescriptorBuilder::BuildEnum(google::protobuf::EnumDescriptorProtoconst&,google::protobuf::Descriptorconst*,google::protobuf::EnumDescriptor*,google::protobuf::internal::FlatAllocator&)	84	37	44.04%
google::protobuf::DescriptorBuilder::BuildEnumValue(google::protobuf::EnumValueDescriptorProtoconst&,google::protobuf::EnumDescriptorconst*,google::protobuf::EnumValueDescriptor*,google::protobuf::internal::FlatAllocator&)	43	21	48.83%
google::protobuf::DescriptorBuilder::CrossLinkField(google::protobuf::FieldDescriptor*,google::protobuf::FieldDescriptorProtoconst&)	193	53	27.46%
google::protobuf::FileDescriptorProto::Clear()	33	15	45.45%
google::protobuf::FileDescriptorProto::_InternalParse(charconst*,google::protobuf::internal::ParseContext*)	171	64	37.42%
google::protobuf::DescriptorProto_ExtensionRange::_InternalParse(charconst*,google::protobuf::internal::ParseContext*)	53	28	52.83%
google::protobuf::OneofDescriptorProto::_InternalParse(charconst*,google::protobuf::internal::ParseContext*)	48	24	50.0%
google::protobuf::EnumDescriptorProto::_InternalParse(charconst*,google::protobuf::internal::ParseContext*)	88	35	39.77%
google::protobuf::FileOptions::Clear()	55	13	23.63%
google::protobuf::FileOptions::_InternalParse(charconst*,google::protobuf::internal::ParseContext*)	241	88	36.51%
google::protobuf::FileOptions::_InternalSerialize(unsignedchar*,google::protobuf::io::EpsCopyOutputStream*)const	139	76	54.67%
google::protobuf::FieldOptions::_InternalParse(charconst*,google::protobuf::internal::ParseContext*)	111	28	25.22%
google::protobuf::FieldOptions::_InternalSerialize(unsignedchar*,google::protobuf::io::EpsCopyOutputStream*)const	48	24	50.0%
google::protobuf::Reflection::FieldSize(google::protobuf::Messageconst&,google::protobuf::FieldDescriptorconst*)const	38	15	39.47%
google::protobuf::Reflection::ClearOneof(google::protobuf::Message*,google::protobuf::OneofDescriptorconst*)const	31	5	16.12%
google::protobuf::internal::IsDescendant(google::protobuf::Message&,google::protobuf::Messageconst&)	37	7	18.91%
google::protobuf::Reflection::HasBit(google::protobuf::Messageconst&,google::protobuf::FieldDescriptorconst*)const	50	5	10.0%
google::protobuf::internal::EpsCopyInputStream::NextBuffer(int,int)	41	11	26.82%
google::protobuf::internal::(anonymousnamespace)::UTF8GenericScan(google::protobuf::internal::UTF8StateMachineObjconst*,charconst*,int,int*)	72	3	4.166%
google::protobuf::TextFormat::Parser::ParserImpl::ConsumeField(google::protobuf::Message*)	199	108	54.27%
google::protobuf::TextFormat::Parser::ParserImpl::ConsumeFieldValue(google::protobuf::Message*,google::protobuf::Reflectionconst*,google::protobuf::FieldDescriptorconst*)	118	51	43.22%
voidprotobuf_mutator::FieldFunction ::operator() (protobuf_mutator::FieldInstanceconst&)const	39	16	41.02%
lua_grammar::Expression::MergeImpl(google::protobuf::Message&,google::protobuf::Messageconst&)	62	12	19.35%
lua_grammar::BinaryOperator::MergeImpl(google::protobuf::Message&,google::protobuf::Messageconst&)	97	12	12.37%

This section shows which files and directories are considered in this report. The main reason for showing this is fuzz introspector may include more code in the reasoning than is desired. This section helps identify if too many files/directories are included, e.g. third party code, which may be irrelevant for the threat model. In the event too much is included, fuzz introspector supports a configuration file that can exclude data from the report. See the following link for more information on how to create a config file: link

Files in report

Source file	Reached by	Covered by
	[]	[]
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lutf8lib.c	[]	[]
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/llex.c	['luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'lua_stringtonumber_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']	['luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'lua_stringtonumber_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lapi.c	['luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'lua_stringtonumber_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']	['luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'lua_stringtonumber_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']
/src/fuzz_lua.c	['fuzz_lua']	['fuzz_lua']
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/loadlib.c	[]	[]
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_loadbuffer_test.c	['luaL_loadbuffer_test']	['luaL_loadbuffer_test']
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_buffaddr_test.c	['luaL_buffaddr_test']	['luaL_buffaddr_test']
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lzio.c	['lua_dump_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']	['lua_dump_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_loadbuffer_proto/luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test.cc	['luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']	['luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lparser.c	['lua_dump_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']	['lua_dump_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lopcodes.c	['luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'lua_stringtonumber_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']	['lua_dump_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldump.c	['lua_dump_test']	['lua_dump_test']
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_buffsub_test.cc	['luaL_buffsub_test']	['luaL_buffsub_test']
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldebug.c	['luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'lua_stringtonumber_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']	['luaL_traceback_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lmem.c	['luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'lua_stringtonumber_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']	['luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'lua_stringtonumber_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltm.c	['luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'lua_stringtonumber_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']	['luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'lua_stringtonumber_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_dostring_test.c	['luaL_dostring_test']	['luaL_dostring_test']
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldo.c	['luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'lua_stringtonumber_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']	['luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'lua_stringtonumber_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lobject.c	['luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'lua_stringtonumber_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']	['luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'lua_stringtonumber_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_bufflen_test.c	['luaL_bufflen_test']	['luaL_bufflen_test']
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lauxlib.c	['luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'lua_stringtonumber_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']	['luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'lua_stringtonumber_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltablib.c	[]	[]
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstring.c	['luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'lua_stringtonumber_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']	['luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'lua_stringtonumber_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/linit.c	['lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']	['lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltable.c	['luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'lua_stringtonumber_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']	['luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'lua_stringtonumber_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lbaselib.c	[]	[]
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstrlib.c	[]	[]
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lgc.c	['luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'lua_stringtonumber_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']	['luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'lua_stringtonumber_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_addgsub_test.cc	['luaL_addgsub_test']	['luaL_addgsub_test']
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstate.c	['luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'lua_stringtonumber_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']	['luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'lua_stringtonumber_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']
/src/testdir/tests/capi/lua_stringtonumber_test.c	['lua_stringtonumber_test']	['lua_stringtonumber_test']
/usr/local/bin/../include/c++/v1/stdexcept	[]	[]
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/liolib.c	[]	[]
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_loadbufferx_test.c	['luaL_loadbufferx_test']	['luaL_loadbufferx_test']
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_loadbuffer_proto/serializer.cc	['luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']	['luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/loslib.c	[]	[]
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lvm.c	['luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'lua_stringtonumber_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']	['luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'lua_stringtonumber_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldblib.c	[]	[]
/src/testdir/tests/capi/lua_dump_test.c	['lua_dump_test']	['lua_dump_test']
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lundump.c	['lua_dump_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']	['lua_dump_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_traceback_test.c	['luaL_traceback_test']	['luaL_traceback_test']
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lcode.c	['lua_dump_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']	['lua_dump_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_gsub_test.cc	['luaL_gsub_test']	['luaL_gsub_test']
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lmathlib.c	[]	[]
/usr/local/bin/../include/c++/v1/string	[]	[]
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lcorolib.c	[]	[]
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lfunc.c	['luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'lua_stringtonumber_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']	['luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'lua_stringtonumber_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']
/src/testdir/tests/capi/lua_load_test.cc	['lua_load_test']	['lua_load_test']
/src/testdir/tests/capi/torture_test.cc	['torture_test']	['torture_test']
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_loadstring_test.c	['luaL_loadstring_test']	['luaL_loadstring_test']

Directories in report

Directory
/usr/local/bin/../include/c++/v1/
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/
/src/
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_loadbuffer_proto/
/src/testdir/tests/capi/