High level conclusions

Fuzzers reach 94.98% code coverage.

Fuzzers reach 77.43% of cyclomatic complexity.

Fuzzers reach 61.45% of all functions.

Fuzzer lua_stringtonumber_test is blocked:

The runtime code coverage of lua_stringtonumber_test covers 19.67% of its statically reachable code. This means there is some place that blocks the fuzzer to continue exploring more code at run time.

Reachability and coverage overview

Functions statically reachable by fuzzers

821 / 1336

Cyclomatic complexity statically reachable by fuzzers

10296 / 13296

Runtime code coverage of functions

1269 / 1336

Warning: The number of runtime covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that Fuzz Introspector found there are more functions covered at runtime than what is considered reachable based on the static analysis. This is a limitation in the analysis as anything covered at runtime is by definition reachable by the fuzzers.
This is likely due to a limitation in the static analysis. In this case, the count of functions covered at runtime is the true value, which means this is what should be considered "achieved" by the fuzzer.

Use the project functions table below to query all functions that were not covered at runtime.

The following table shows data about each function in the project. The functions included in this table correspond to all functions that exist in the executables of the fuzzers. As such, there may be functions that are from third-party libraries.

For further technical details on the meaning of columns in the below table, please see the Glossary .

Func name	Functions filename	Args	Function call depth	Reached by Fuzzers	Runtime reached by Fuzzers	Combined reached by Fuzzers	Fuzzers runtime hit	Func lines hit %	I Count	BB Count	Cyclomatic complexity	Functions reached	Reached by functions	Accumulated cyclomatic complexity	Undiscovered complexity

Fuzzer: lua_stringtonumber_test

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is

Color	Runtime hitcount	Callsite count	Percentage
red	0	4135	90.2%
gold	[1:9]	0	0.0%
yellow	[10:29]	0	0.0%
greenyellow	[30:49]	4	0.08%
lawngreen	50+	443	9.66%
All colors	4582	100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked	Calltree index	Parent function	Callsite	Largest blocked function
1083	2868	luaH_new	call site: 02868	luaH_resize
656	1925	luaS_new	call site: 01925	luaG_runerror
614	1304	callallpendingfinalizers	call site: 01304	GCTM
402	436	freeobj	call site: 00436	entergen
281	3986	luaV_tonumber_	call site: 03986	luaG_forerror
204	2655	luaH_resize	call site: 02655	luaH_newkey
148	1154	separatetobefnz	call site: 01154	propagateall
118	1032	internshrstr	call site: 01032	luaM_toobig
107	4273	luaH_setint	call site: 04273	luaH_newkey
101	284	luaF_closeupval	call site: 00284	luaC_barrier_
69	860	luaF_close	call site: 00860	prepcallclosemth
44	198	luaM_free_	call site: 00198	freeupval

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions

73

Functions that are reachable but not covered

298

Reachable functions

371

Percentage of reachable functions covered

19.68%

NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.

Function name	source code lines	source lines hit	percentage hit

Files reached

filename	functions hit
/src/testdir/tests/capi/lua_stringtonumber_test.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lauxlib.c	9
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstate.c	19
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lobject.c	21
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldo.c	28
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lmem.c	5
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lgc.c	71
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltable.c	53
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lfunc.c	14
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstring.c	16
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltm.c	19
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldebug.c	35
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lvm.c	29
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lopcodes.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/llex.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lapi.c	9

Fuzzer: luaL_bufflen_test

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is

Color	Runtime hitcount	Callsite count	Percentage
red	0	3721	73.8%
gold	[1:9]	0	0.0%
yellow	[10:29]	0	0.0%
greenyellow	[30:49]	11	0.21%
lawngreen	50+	1305	25.9%
All colors	5037	100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked	Calltree index	Parent function	Callsite	Largest blocked function
737	3532	luaF_newtbcupval	call site: 03532	luaG_traceexec
646	2870	luaH_new	call site: 02870	luaH_resize
213	1927	luaS_new	call site: 01927	luaG_runerror
183	2678	luaV_finishset	call site: 02678	luaG_typeerror
153	1767	luaD_precall	call site: 01767	luaD_growstack
123	1376	luaD_callnoyield	call site: 01376	luaE_checkcstack
123	1510	luaS_newlstr	call site: 01510	luaD_throw
110	4570	newbuffsize	call site: 04570	luaL_error
94	2317	getgeneric	call site: 02317	luaG_runerror
87	581	genlink	call site: 00581	traverseephemeron
87	1207	checkmajorminor	call site: 01207	atomic2gen
81	670	traversetable	call site: 00670	traverseproto

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions

187

Functions that are reachable but not covered

247

Reachable functions

430

Percentage of reachable functions covered

42.56%

NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.

Function name	source code lines	source lines hit	percentage hit

Files reached

filename	functions hit
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_bufflen_test.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lauxlib.c	22
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstate.c	19
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lobject.c	21
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldo.c	28
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lmem.c	5
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lgc.c	74
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltable.c	57
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lfunc.c	15
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstring.c	19
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltm.c	19
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldebug.c	42
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lvm.c	29
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lopcodes.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/llex.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lapi.c	34

Fuzzer: luaL_traceback_test

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is

Color	Runtime hitcount	Callsite count	Percentage
red	0	3843	74.5%
gold	[1:9]	1	0.01%
yellow	[10:29]	0	0.0%
greenyellow	[30:49]	0	0.0%
lawngreen	50+	1311	25.4%
All colors	5155	100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked	Calltree index	Parent function	Callsite	Largest blocked function
737	3530	luaF_newtbcupval	call site: 03530	luaG_traceexec
646	2868	luaH_new	call site: 02868	luaH_resize
213	1925	luaS_new	call site: 01925	luaG_runerror
183	2676	luaV_finishset	call site: 02676	luaG_typeerror
153	1765	luaD_precall	call site: 01765	luaD_growstack
123	1374	luaD_callnoyield	call site: 01374	luaE_checkcstack
123	1508	luaS_newlstr	call site: 01508	luaD_throw
109	4579	newbuffsize	call site: 04579	luaL_error
106	4969	luaL_traceback	call site: 04969	luaL_addvalue
94	2315	getgeneric	call site: 02315	luaG_runerror
87	579	genlink	call site: 00579	traverseephemeron
87	1205	checkmajorminor	call site: 01205	atomic2gen

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions

190

Functions that are reachable but not covered

260

Reachable functions

446

Percentage of reachable functions covered

41.7%

NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.

Function name	source code lines	source lines hit	percentage hit

Files reached

filename	functions hit
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_traceback_test.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lauxlib.c	29
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstate.c	19
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lobject.c	21
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldo.c	28
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lmem.c	5
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lgc.c	74
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltable.c	59
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lfunc.c	15
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstring.c	19
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltm.c	19
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldebug.c	42
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lvm.c	29
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lopcodes.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/llex.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lapi.c	40

Fuzzer: luaL_buffaddr_test

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is

Color	Runtime hitcount	Callsite count	Percentage
red	0	3737	74.1%
gold	[1:9]	0	0.0%
yellow	[10:29]	0	0.0%
greenyellow	[30:49]	11	0.21%
lawngreen	50+	1289	25.5%
All colors	5037	100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked	Calltree index	Parent function	Callsite	Largest blocked function
737	3532	luaF_newtbcupval	call site: 03532	luaG_traceexec
646	2870	luaH_new	call site: 02870	luaH_resize
213	1927	luaS_new	call site: 01927	luaG_runerror
183	2678	luaV_finishset	call site: 02678	luaG_typeerror
153	1767	luaD_precall	call site: 01767	luaD_growstack
123	1376	luaD_callnoyield	call site: 01376	luaE_checkcstack
123	1510	luaS_newlstr	call site: 01510	luaD_throw
110	4570	newbuffsize	call site: 04570	luaL_error
94	2317	getgeneric	call site: 02317	luaG_runerror
87	581	genlink	call site: 00581	traverseephemeron
87	1207	checkmajorminor	call site: 01207	atomic2gen
81	670	traversetable	call site: 00670	traverseproto

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions

186

Functions that are reachable but not covered

248

Reachable functions

430

Percentage of reachable functions covered

42.33%

NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.

Function name	source code lines	source lines hit	percentage hit

Files reached

filename	functions hit
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_buffaddr_test.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lauxlib.c	22
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstate.c	19
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lobject.c	21
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldo.c	28
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lmem.c	5
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lgc.c	74
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltable.c	57
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lfunc.c	15
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstring.c	19
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltm.c	19
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldebug.c	42
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lvm.c	29
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lopcodes.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/llex.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lapi.c	34

Fuzzer: luaL_buffsub_test

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is

Color	Runtime hitcount	Callsite count	Percentage
red	0	3737	74.1%
gold	[1:9]	4	0.07%
yellow	[10:29]	0	0.0%
greenyellow	[30:49]	0	0.0%
lawngreen	50+	1298	25.7%
All colors	5039	100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked	Calltree index	Parent function	Callsite	Largest blocked function
737	3532	luaF_newtbcupval	call site: 03532	luaG_traceexec
646	2870	luaH_new	call site: 02870	luaH_resize
213	1927	luaS_new	call site: 01927	luaG_runerror
183	2678	luaV_finishset	call site: 02678	luaG_typeerror
153	1767	luaD_precall	call site: 01767	luaD_growstack
123	1376	luaD_callnoyield	call site: 01376	luaE_checkcstack
123	1510	luaS_newlstr	call site: 01510	luaD_throw
110	4570	newbuffsize	call site: 04570	luaL_error
94	2317	getgeneric	call site: 02317	luaG_runerror
87	581	genlink	call site: 00581	traverseephemeron
87	1207	checkmajorminor	call site: 01207	atomic2gen
81	670	traversetable	call site: 00670	traverseproto

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions

185

Functions that are reachable but not covered

248

Reachable functions

429

Percentage of reachable functions covered

42.19%

NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.

Function name	source code lines	source lines hit	percentage hit

Files reached

filename	functions hit
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_buffsub_test.cc	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lauxlib.c	21
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstate.c	19
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lobject.c	21
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldo.c	28
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lmem.c	5
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lgc.c	74
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltable.c	57
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lfunc.c	15
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstring.c	19
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltm.c	19
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldebug.c	42
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lvm.c	29
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lopcodes.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/llex.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lapi.c	34

Fuzzer: luaL_gsub_test

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is

Color	Runtime hitcount	Callsite count	Percentage
red	0	3711	73.3%
gold	[1:9]	2	0.03%
yellow	[10:29]	5	0.09%
greenyellow	[30:49]	0	0.0%
lawngreen	50+	1338	26.4%
All colors	5056	100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked	Calltree index	Parent function	Callsite	Largest blocked function
737	3530	luaF_newtbcupval	call site: 03530	luaG_traceexec
646	2868	luaH_new	call site: 02868	luaH_resize
213	1925	luaS_new	call site: 01925	luaG_runerror
183	2676	luaV_finishset	call site: 02676	luaG_typeerror
153	1765	luaD_precall	call site: 01765	luaD_growstack
123	1375	luaD_callnoyield	call site: 01375	luaE_checkcstack
123	1509	luaS_newlstr	call site: 01509	luaD_throw
110	4589	newbuffsize	call site: 04589	luaL_error
94	2315	getgeneric	call site: 02315	luaG_runerror
87	580	genlink	call site: 00580	traverseephemeron
87	1206	checkmajorminor	call site: 01206	atomic2gen
81	669	traversetable	call site: 00669	traverseproto

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions

191

Functions that are reachable but not covered

247

Reachable functions

434

Percentage of reachable functions covered

43.09%

NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.

Function name	source code lines	source lines hit	percentage hit

Files reached

filename	functions hit
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_gsub_test.cc	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lauxlib.c	24
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstate.c	19
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lobject.c	21
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldo.c	28
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lmem.c	5
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lgc.c	74
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltable.c	57
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lfunc.c	15
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstring.c	19
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltm.c	19
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldebug.c	42
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lvm.c	29
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lopcodes.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/llex.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lapi.c	35

Fuzzer: luaL_loadbufferx_test

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is

Color	Runtime hitcount	Callsite count	Percentage
red	0	3408	48.3%
gold	[1:9]	24	0.34%
yellow	[10:29]	20	0.28%
greenyellow	[30:49]	21	0.29%
lawngreen	50+	3579	50.7%
All colors	7052	100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked	Calltree index	Parent function	Callsite	Largest blocked function
470	3076	luaV_tointegerns	call site: 03076	luaG_traceexec
387	3564	luaV_equalobj	call site: 03564	luaT_callTMres
270	1648	luaD_reallocstack	call site: 01648	luaD_reallocstack
172	4664	luaF_newproto	call site: 04664	loadFunction
159	2868	luaH_new	call site: 02868	luaH_resize
158	3981	luaO_str2num	call site: 03981	luaG_forerror
137	2001	luaP_isIT	call site: 02001	luaD_hook
118	4146	luaF_newLclosure	call site: 04146	luaF_findupval
111	2748	luaH_pset	call site: 02748	luaG_runerror
93	2316	luaH_get	call site: 02316	luaG_runerror
87	579	genlink	call site: 00579	traverseephemeron
87	1205	checkmajorminor	call site: 01205	atomic2gen

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions

459

Functions that are reachable but not covered

206

Reachable functions

659

Percentage of reachable functions covered

68.74%

NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.

Function name	source code lines	source lines hit	percentage hit

Files reached

filename	functions hit
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_loadbufferx_test.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lauxlib.c	11
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstate.c	20
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lobject.c	24
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldo.c	32
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lmem.c	8
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lgc.c	71
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltable.c	56
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lfunc.c	16
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstring.c	18
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltm.c	19
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldebug.c	35
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lvm.c	29
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lopcodes.c	2
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/llex.c	25
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lapi.c	8
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lzio.c	5
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lundump.c	23
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lparser.c	107
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lcode.c	108

Fuzzer: lua_dump_test

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is

Color	Runtime hitcount	Callsite count	Percentage
red	0	3409	47.5%
gold	[1:9]	29	0.40%
yellow	[10:29]	33	0.45%
greenyellow	[30:49]	7	0.09%
lawngreen	50+	3696	51.5%
All colors	7174	100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked	Calltree index	Parent function	Callsite	Largest blocked function
470	3076	luaV_tointegerns	call site: 03076	luaG_traceexec
387	3564	luaV_equalobj	call site: 03564	luaT_callTMres
270	1648	luaD_reallocstack	call site: 01648	luaD_reallocstack
172	4670	luaF_newproto	call site: 04670	loadFunction
159	2868	luaH_new	call site: 02868	luaH_resize
158	3981	luaO_str2num	call site: 03981	luaG_forerror
137	2001	luaP_isIT	call site: 02001	luaD_hook
118	4146	luaF_newLclosure	call site: 04146	luaF_findupval
111	2748	luaH_pset	call site: 02748	luaG_runerror
93	2316	luaH_get	call site: 02316	luaG_runerror
87	579	genlink	call site: 00579	traverseephemeron
87	1205	checkmajorminor	call site: 01205	atomic2gen

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions

476

Functions that are reachable but not covered

209

Reachable functions

679

Percentage of reachable functions covered

69.22%

NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.

Function name	source code lines	source lines hit	percentage hit

Files reached

filename	functions hit
/src/testdir/tests/capi/lua_dump_test.c	2
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lauxlib.c	12
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstate.c	20
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lobject.c	24
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldo.c	32
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lmem.c	8
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lgc.c	71
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltable.c	56
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lfunc.c	16
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstring.c	18
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltm.c	19
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldebug.c	35
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lvm.c	29
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lopcodes.c	2
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/llex.c	25
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lapi.c	9
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lzio.c	5
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lundump.c	23
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lparser.c	107
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lcode.c	108
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldump.c	17

Fuzzer: fuzz_lua

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is

Color	Runtime hitcount	Callsite count	Percentage
red	0	2514	32.6%
gold	[1:9]	437	5.67%
yellow	[10:29]	169	2.19%
greenyellow	[30:49]	88	1.14%
lawngreen	50+	4489	58.3%
All colors	7697	100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked	Calltree index	Parent function	Callsite	Largest blocked function
87	579	genlink	call site: 00579	traverseephemeron
87	1205	checkmajorminor	call site: 01205	atomic2gen
80	4664	luaF_newproto	call site: 04664	loadFunction
79	4757	luaS_newextlstr	call site: 04757	loadProtos
76	2951	luaV_execute	call site: 02951	luaV_finishget
69	2878	luaV_execute	call site: 02878	youngcollection
64	3076	luaV_tointegerns	call site: 03076	luaG_traceexec
63	4031	luaV_execute	call site: 04031	luaF_newtbcupval
62	7504	findfield	call site: 07504	findfield
61	4572	checkmode	call site: 04572	luaU_undump
51	3564	luaV_equalobj	call site: 03564	luaT_callTMres
42	7256	lua_getinfo	call site: 07256	collectvalidlines

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions

584

Functions that are reachable but not covered

175

Reachable functions

752

Percentage of reachable functions covered

76.73%

NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.

Function name	source code lines	source lines hit	percentage hit

Files reached

filename	functions hit
/src/fuzz_lua.c	8
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lauxlib.c	33
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstate.c	20
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lobject.c	24
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldo.c	32
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lmem.c	8
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lgc.c	74
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltable.c	59
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lfunc.c	17
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstring.c	19
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltm.c	19
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldebug.c	44
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lvm.c	29
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lopcodes.c	2
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/llex.c	25
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lapi.c	50
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lzio.c	5
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lundump.c	23
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lparser.c	107
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lcode.c	108

Fuzzer: luaL_dostring_test

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is

Color	Runtime hitcount	Callsite count	Percentage
red	0	585	8.06%
gold	[1:9]	69	0.95%
yellow	[10:29]	49	0.67%
greenyellow	[30:49]	43	0.59%
lawngreen	50+	6504	89.7%
All colors	7250	100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked	Calltree index	Parent function	Callsite	Largest blocked function
43	3564	luaV_equalobj	call site: 03564	luaT_callTMres
20	668	traversetable	call site: 00668	traverseudata
19	2295	equalkey	call site: 02295	luaS_eqstr
18	581	genlink	call site: 00581	traverseweakvalue
18	2527	luaH_finishset	call site: 02527	luaS_normstr
16	4248	luaV_execute	call site: 04248	createvarargtab
13	605	iscleared	call site: 00605	genlink
13	966	luaC_fullgc	call site: 00966	luaD_throw
13	2060	luaV_execute	call site: 02060	luaG_traceexec
12	1452	addnum2buff	call site: 01452	addnum2buff
10	4887	loadAlign	call site: 04887	getaddr_
10	5658	numarith	call site: 05658	intarith

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions

1035

Functions that are reachable but not covered

55

Reachable functions

682

Percentage of reachable functions covered

91.94%

NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.

Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.

Function name	source code lines	source lines hit	percentage hit

Files reached

filename	functions hit
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_dostring_test.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lauxlib.c	14
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstate.c	20
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lobject.c	24
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldo.c	32
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lmem.c	8
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lgc.c	71
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltable.c	57
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lfunc.c	17
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstring.c	18
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltm.c	19
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldebug.c	35
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lvm.c	29
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lopcodes.c	2
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/llex.c	25
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lapi.c	25
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/linit.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lzio.c	5
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lundump.c	23
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lparser.c	107
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lcode.c	108

Fuzzer: luaL_loadbuffer_test

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is

Color	Runtime hitcount	Callsite count	Percentage
red	0	528	7.28%
gold	[1:9]	52	0.71%
yellow	[10:29]	10	0.13%
greenyellow	[30:49]	15	0.20%
lawngreen	50+	6641	91.6%
All colors	7246	100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked	Calltree index	Parent function	Callsite	Largest blocked function
43	3564	luaV_equalobj	call site: 03564	luaT_callTMres
20	668	traversetable	call site: 00668	traverseudata
19	2295	equalkey	call site: 02295	luaS_eqstr
18	581	genlink	call site: 00581	traverseweakvalue
18	2527	luaH_finishset	call site: 02527	luaS_normstr
16	4248	luaV_execute	call site: 04248	createvarargtab
14	1935	typeerror	call site: 01935	luaG_runerror
13	605	iscleared	call site: 00605	genlink
13	966	luaC_fullgc	call site: 00966	luaD_throw
13	2060	luaV_execute	call site: 02060	luaG_traceexec
12	1452	addnum2buff	call site: 01452	addnum2buff
10	4883	loadAlign	call site: 04883	getaddr_

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions

972

Functions that are reachable but not covered

54

Reachable functions

681

Percentage of reachable functions covered

92.07%

NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.

Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.

Function name	source code lines	source lines hit	percentage hit

Files reached

filename	functions hit
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_loadbuffer_test.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lauxlib.c	13
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstate.c	20
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lobject.c	24
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldo.c	32
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lmem.c	8
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lgc.c	71
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltable.c	57
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lfunc.c	17
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstring.c	18
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltm.c	19
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldebug.c	35
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lvm.c	29
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lopcodes.c	2
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/llex.c	25
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lapi.c	25
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/linit.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lzio.c	5
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lundump.c	23
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lparser.c	107
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lcode.c	108

Fuzzer: torture_test

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is

Color	Runtime hitcount	Callsite count	Percentage
red	0	3030	61.6%
gold	[1:9]	184	3.74%
yellow	[10:29]	274	5.57%
greenyellow	[30:49]	145	2.95%
lawngreen	50+	1281	26.0%
All colors	4914	100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked	Calltree index	Parent function	Callsite	Largest blocked function
285	3076	luaV_tointegerns	call site: 03076	luaG_traceexec
263	3682	LEnum	call site: 03682	lessequalothers
200	2868	luaH_new	call site: 02868	luaH_resize
153	1765	luaD_precall	call site: 01765	luaD_growstack
150	3989	luaV_tonumber_	call site: 03989	luaG_forerror
137	2001	luaP_isIT	call site: 02001	luaD_hook
118	4146	luaF_newLclosure	call site: 04146	luaF_findupval
113	2746	luaH_pset	call site: 02746	luaG_runerror
93	2316	luaH_get	call site: 02316	luaG_runerror
87	579	genlink	call site: 00579	traverseephemeron
87	1205	checkmajorminor	call site: 01205	atomic2gen
74	1925	luaS_new	call site: 01925	luaG_runerror

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions

552

Functions that are reachable but not covered

170

Reachable functions

415

Percentage of reachable functions covered

59.04%

NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.

Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.

Function name	source code lines	source lines hit	percentage hit

Files reached

filename	functions hit
/src/testdir/tests/capi/torture_test.cc	5
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lauxlib.c	14
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstate.c	19
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lobject.c	21
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldo.c	28
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lmem.c	5
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lgc.c	74
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltable.c	57
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lfunc.c	15
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstring.c	16
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltm.c	19
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldebug.c	44
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lvm.c	29
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lopcodes.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/llex.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lapi.c	23

Fuzzer: luaL_loadstring_test

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is

Color	Runtime hitcount	Callsite count	Percentage
red	0	807	11.1%
gold	[1:9]	87	1.2%
yellow	[10:29]	83	1.14%
greenyellow	[30:49]	63	0.86%
lawngreen	50+	6210	85.6%
All colors	7250	100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked	Calltree index	Parent function	Callsite	Largest blocked function
43	3564	luaV_equalobj	call site: 03564	luaT_callTMres
35	4210	luaV_execute	call site: 04210	luaG_traceexec
20	668	traversetable	call site: 00668	traverseudata
19	2295	equalkey	call site: 02295	luaS_eqstr
18	581	genlink	call site: 00581	traverseweakvalue
18	2527	luaH_finishset	call site: 02527	luaS_normstr
17	6483	forstat	call site: 06483	repeatstat
16	2060	luaV_execute	call site: 02060	luaG_traceexec
16	4248	luaV_execute	call site: 04248	createvarargtab
14	7230	f_call	call site: 07230	luaD_call
13	605	iscleared	call site: 00605	genlink
13	966	luaC_fullgc	call site: 00966	luaD_throw

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions

967

Functions that are reachable but not covered

63

Reachable functions

682

Percentage of reachable functions covered

90.76%

NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.

Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.

Function name	source code lines	source lines hit	percentage hit

Files reached

filename	functions hit
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_loadstring_test.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lauxlib.c	14
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstate.c	20
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lobject.c	24
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldo.c	32
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lmem.c	8
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lgc.c	71
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltable.c	57
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lfunc.c	17
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstring.c	18
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltm.c	19
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldebug.c	35
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lvm.c	29
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lopcodes.c	2
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/llex.c	25
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lapi.c	25
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/linit.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lzio.c	5
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lundump.c	23
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lparser.c	107
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lcode.c	108

Fuzzer: luaL_addgsub_test

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is

Color	Runtime hitcount	Callsite count	Percentage
red	0	3720	73.6%
gold	[1:9]	0	0.0%
yellow	[10:29]	0	0.0%
greenyellow	[30:49]	0	0.0%
lawngreen	50+	1331	26.3%
All colors	5051	100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked	Calltree index	Parent function	Callsite	Largest blocked function
737	3532	luaF_newtbcupval	call site: 03532	luaG_traceexec
646	2870	luaH_new	call site: 02870	luaH_resize
213	1927	luaS_new	call site: 01927	luaG_runerror
183	2678	luaV_finishset	call site: 02678	luaG_typeerror
153	1767	luaD_precall	call site: 01767	luaD_growstack
123	1376	luaD_callnoyield	call site: 01376	luaE_checkcstack
123	1510	luaS_newlstr	call site: 01510	luaD_throw
110	4572	newbuffsize	call site: 04572	luaL_error
94	2317	getgeneric	call site: 02317	luaG_runerror
87	581	genlink	call site: 00581	traverseephemeron
87	1207	checkmajorminor	call site: 01207	atomic2gen
81	670	traversetable	call site: 00670	traverseproto

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions

188

Functions that are reachable but not covered

248

Reachable functions

432

Percentage of reachable functions covered

42.59%

NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.

Function name	source code lines	source lines hit	percentage hit

Files reached

filename	functions hit
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_addgsub_test.cc	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lauxlib.c	23
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstate.c	19
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lobject.c	21
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldo.c	28
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lmem.c	5
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lgc.c	74
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltable.c	57
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lfunc.c	15
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstring.c	19
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltm.c	19
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldebug.c	42
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lvm.c	29
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lopcodes.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/llex.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lapi.c	34

Fuzzer: lua_load_test

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is

Color	Runtime hitcount	Callsite count	Percentage
red	0	695	9.58%
gold	[1:9]	31	0.42%
yellow	[10:29]	55	0.75%
greenyellow	[30:49]	30	0.41%
lawngreen	50+	6439	88.8%
All colors	7250	100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked	Calltree index	Parent function	Callsite	Largest blocked function
78	4948	luaS_newextlstr	call site: 04948	loadProtos
77	4857	luaF_newproto	call site: 04857	loadFunction
43	3564	luaV_equalobj	call site: 03564	luaT_callTMres
31	2680	luaV_finishset	call site: 02680	luaT_callTM
22	4210	luaV_execute	call site: 04210	luaG_traceexec
20	669	traversetable	call site: 00669	traverseudata
19	2295	equalkey	call site: 02295	luaS_eqstr
18	582	genlink	call site: 00582	traverseweakvalue
18	2527	luaH_finishset	call site: 02527	luaS_normstr
16	1597	luaG_errormsg	call site: 01597	luaD_callnoyield
14	1935	typeerror	call site: 01935	luaG_runerror
13	606	iscleared	call site: 00606	genlink

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions

961

Functions that are reachable but not covered

72

Reachable functions

681

Percentage of reachable functions covered

89.43%

NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.

Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.

Function name	source code lines	source lines hit	percentage hit

Files reached

filename	functions hit
/src/testdir/tests/capi/lua_load_test.cc	2
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lauxlib.c	11
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstate.c	20
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lobject.c	24
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldo.c	32
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lmem.c	8
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lgc.c	71
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltable.c	57
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lfunc.c	17
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstring.c	18
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltm.c	19
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldebug.c	35
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lvm.c	29
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lopcodes.c	2
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/llex.c	25
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lapi.c	25
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/linit.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lzio.c	5
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lundump.c	23
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lparser.c	107
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lcode.c	108

Fuzzer: luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is

Color	Runtime hitcount	Callsite count	Percentage
red	0	1254	16.7%
gold	[1:9]	25	0.33%
yellow	[10:29]	57	0.76%
greenyellow	[30:49]	41	0.54%
lawngreen	50+	6091	81.5%
All colors	7468	100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked	Calltree index	Parent function	Callsite	Largest blocked function
85	584	genlink	call site: 00584	traverseephemeron
78	5165	luaS_newextlstr	call site: 05165	loadProtos
77	5074	luaF_newproto	call site: 05074	loadFunction
43	3565	luaV_equalobj	call site: 03565	luaT_callTMres
28	2791	luaV_execute	call site: 02791	luaV_finishset
26	1676	precallC	call site: 01676	luaD_hook
24	3077	luaV_tointegerns	call site: 03077	luaG_traceexec
23	2349	luaV_execute	call site: 02349	luaV_finishget
22	4211	luaV_execute	call site: 04211	luaG_traceexec
21	1086	remarkupvals	call site: 01086	reallymarkobject
21	1708	luaD_poscall	call site: 01708	rethook
20	671	traversetable	call site: 00671	traverseudata

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions

3291

Functions that are reachable but not covered

99

Reachable functions

848

Percentage of reachable functions covered

88.33%

NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.

Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.

Function name	source code lines	source lines hit	percentage hit

Files reached

filename	functions hit
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_loadbuffer_proto/luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test.cc	5
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lauxlib.c	13
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstate.c	20
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lobject.c	24
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldo.c	32
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lmem.c	8
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lgc.c	71
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltable.c	57
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lfunc.c	17
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstring.c	18
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltm.c	19
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldebug.c	35
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lvm.c	29
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lopcodes.c	2
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/llex.c	25
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lapi.c	25
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_loadbuffer_proto/serializer.cc	76
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/linit.c	1
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lzio.c	5
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lundump.c	23
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lparser.c	107
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lcode.c	108

Optimal target analysis

Remaining optimal interesting functions

The following table shows a list of functions that are optimal targets. Optimal targets are identified by finding the functions that in combination, yield a high code coverage.

Func name	Functions filename	Arg count	Args	Function depth	hitcount	instr count	bb count	cyclomatic complexity	Reachable functions	Incoming references	total cyclomatic complexity	Unreached complexity
luaB_cowrap	/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lcorolib.c	1	['N/A']	208	0	17	3	2	403	0	5777	249
str_gsub	/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstrlib.c	1	['N/A']	173	0	418	57	18	454	0	6102	227
io_lines	/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/liolib.c	1	['N/A']	175	0	95	12	5	456	0	6037	153
str_format	/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstrlib.c	1	['N/A']	173	0	686	99	23	446	0	6049	135
luaB_loadfile	/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lbaselib.c	1	['N/A']	172	0	48	3	2	689	0	8282	116
sort	/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltablib.c	1	['N/A']	171	0	76	12	5	402	0	5646	110
searcher_Croot	/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/loadlib.c	1	['N/A']	174	0	105	12	6	449	0	5985	90
str_pack	/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstrlib.c	1	['N/A']	172	0	770	84	24	435	0	5975	83
__lua_getiuservalue(lua_State*,FuzzedDataProvider*)	/src/testdir/tests/capi/torture_test.cc	2	['N/A', 'N/A']	42	0	54	7	2	341	0	5064	68
db_sethook	/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldblib.c	1	['N/A']	173	0	164	16	7	407	0	5736	51

Implementing fuzzers that target the above functions will improve reachability such that it becomes:

Functions statically reachable by fuzzers

975 / 1336

Cyclomatic complexity statically reachable by fuzzers

11546 / 13296

All functions overview

If you implement fuzzers for these functions, the status of all functions in the project will be:

Func name	Functions filename	Args	Function call depth	Reached by Fuzzers	Runtime reached by Fuzzers	Combined reached by Fuzzers	Fuzzers runtime hit	Func lines hit %	I Count	BB Count	Cyclomatic complexity	Functions reached	Reached by functions	Accumulated cyclomatic complexity	Undiscovered complexity

This sections provides heuristics that can be used as input to a fuzz engine when running a given fuzz target. The current focus is on providing input that is usable by libFuzzer.

/src/testdir/tests/capi/lua_stringtonumber_test.c

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag

Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['luaH_new', 'luaS_new', 'callallpendingfinalizers', 'freeobj', 'luaV_tonumber_', 'luaH_resize', 'separatetobefnz', 'internshrstr', 'luaH_setint', 'luaF_closeupval']

/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_bufflen_test.c

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag

Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['luaF_newtbcupval', 'luaH_new', 'luaS_new', 'luaV_finishset', 'luaD_precall', 'luaD_callnoyield', 'luaS_newlstr', 'newbuffsize', 'getgeneric', 'genlink']

/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_traceback_test.c

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag

Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['luaF_newtbcupval', 'luaH_new', 'luaS_new', 'luaV_finishset', 'luaD_precall', 'luaD_callnoyield', 'luaS_newlstr', 'newbuffsize', 'luaL_traceback', 'getgeneric']

/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_buffaddr_test.c

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag

Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['luaF_newtbcupval', 'luaH_new', 'luaS_new', 'luaV_finishset', 'luaD_precall', 'luaD_callnoyield', 'luaS_newlstr', 'newbuffsize', 'getgeneric', 'genlink']

/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_buffsub_test.cc

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag

Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['luaF_newtbcupval', 'luaH_new', 'luaS_new', 'luaV_finishset', 'luaD_precall', 'luaD_callnoyield', 'luaS_newlstr', 'newbuffsize', 'getgeneric', 'genlink']

/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_gsub_test.cc

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag

Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['luaF_newtbcupval', 'luaH_new', 'luaS_new', 'luaV_finishset', 'luaD_precall', 'luaD_callnoyield', 'luaS_newlstr', 'newbuffsize', 'getgeneric', 'genlink']

/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_loadbufferx_test.c

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag

Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['luaV_tointegerns', 'luaV_equalobj', 'luaD_reallocstack', 'luaF_newproto', 'luaH_new', 'luaO_str2num', 'luaP_isIT', 'luaF_newLclosure', 'luaH_pset', 'luaH_get']

/src/testdir/tests/capi/lua_dump_test.c

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag

Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['luaV_tointegerns', 'luaV_equalobj', 'luaD_reallocstack', 'luaF_newproto', 'luaH_new', 'luaO_str2num', 'luaP_isIT', 'luaF_newLclosure', 'luaH_pset', 'luaH_get']

/src/fuzz_lua.c

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag

Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['genlink', 'checkmajorminor', 'luaF_newproto', 'luaS_newextlstr', 'luaV_execute', 'luaV_tointegerns', 'findfield', 'checkmode']

/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_dostring_test.c

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag

Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['luaV_equalobj', 'traversetable', 'equalkey', 'genlink', 'luaH_finishset', 'luaV_execute', 'iscleared', 'luaC_fullgc', 'addnum2buff']

/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_loadbuffer_test.c

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag

Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['luaV_equalobj', 'traversetable', 'equalkey', 'genlink', 'luaH_finishset', 'luaV_execute', 'typeerror', 'iscleared', 'luaC_fullgc']

/src/testdir/tests/capi/torture_test.cc

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag

Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['luaV_tointegerns', 'LEnum', 'luaH_new', 'luaD_precall', 'luaV_tonumber_', 'luaP_isIT', 'luaF_newLclosure', 'luaH_pset', 'luaH_get', 'genlink']

/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_loadstring_test.c

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag

Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['luaV_equalobj', 'luaV_execute', 'traversetable', 'equalkey', 'genlink', 'luaH_finishset', 'forstat', 'f_call']

/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_addgsub_test.cc

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag

Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['luaF_newtbcupval', 'luaH_new', 'luaS_new', 'luaV_finishset', 'luaD_precall', 'luaD_callnoyield', 'luaS_newlstr', 'newbuffsize', 'getgeneric', 'genlink']

/src/testdir/tests/capi/lua_load_test.cc

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag

Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['luaS_newextlstr', 'luaF_newproto', 'luaV_equalobj', 'luaV_finishset', 'luaV_execute', 'traversetable', 'equalkey', 'genlink', 'luaH_finishset', 'luaG_errormsg']

/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_loadbuffer_proto/luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test.cc

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag

Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['genlink', 'luaS_newextlstr', 'luaF_newproto', 'luaV_equalobj', 'luaV_execute', 'precallC', 'luaV_tointegerns', 'remarkupvals']

This section shows analysis of runtime coverage data.

For futher technical details on how this section is generated, please see the Glossary .

Complex functions with low coverage

Func name	Function total lines	Lines covered at runtime	percentage covered	Reached by fuzzers
luaV_finishOp	54	18	33.33%	['lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_dostring_test']
google::protobuf::DescriptorBuilder::AddSymbol(std::__1::basic_string ,std::__1::allocator >const&,voidconst*,std::__1::basic_string ,std::__1::allocator >const&,google::protobuf::Messageconst&,google::protobuf::Symbol)	40	8	20.0%
google::protobuf::DescriptorBuilder::BuildFile(google::protobuf::FileDescriptorProtoconst&)	49	21	42.85%
google::protobuf::DescriptorBuilder::BuildFileImpl(google::protobuf::FileDescriptorProtoconst&,google::protobuf::internal::FlatAllocator&)	201	79	39.30%
google::protobuf::DescriptorBuilder::BuildMessage(google::protobuf::DescriptorProtoconst&,google::protobuf::Descriptorconst*,google::protobuf::Descriptor*,google::protobuf::internal::FlatAllocator&)	135	68	50.37%
google::protobuf::DescriptorBuilder::BuildFieldOrExtension(google::protobuf::FieldDescriptorProtoconst&,google::protobuf::Descriptor*,google::protobuf::FieldDescriptor*,bool,google::protobuf::internal::FlatAllocator&)	232	103	44.39%
google::protobuf::DescriptorBuilder::BuildEnum(google::protobuf::EnumDescriptorProtoconst&,google::protobuf::Descriptorconst*,google::protobuf::EnumDescriptor*,google::protobuf::internal::FlatAllocator&)	84	37	44.04%
google::protobuf::DescriptorBuilder::BuildEnumValue(google::protobuf::EnumValueDescriptorProtoconst&,google::protobuf::EnumDescriptorconst*,google::protobuf::EnumValueDescriptor*,google::protobuf::internal::FlatAllocator&)	43	21	48.83%
google::protobuf::DescriptorBuilder::CrossLinkField(google::protobuf::FieldDescriptor*,google::protobuf::FieldDescriptorProtoconst&)	193	53	27.46%
google::protobuf::FileDescriptorProto::Clear()	33	15	45.45%
google::protobuf::FileDescriptorProto::_InternalParse(charconst*,google::protobuf::internal::ParseContext*)	171	64	37.42%
google::protobuf::DescriptorProto_ExtensionRange::_InternalParse(charconst*,google::protobuf::internal::ParseContext*)	53	28	52.83%
google::protobuf::OneofDescriptorProto::_InternalParse(charconst*,google::protobuf::internal::ParseContext*)	48	24	50.0%
google::protobuf::EnumDescriptorProto::_InternalParse(charconst*,google::protobuf::internal::ParseContext*)	88	35	39.77%
google::protobuf::FileOptions::Clear()	55	13	23.63%
google::protobuf::FileOptions::_InternalParse(charconst*,google::protobuf::internal::ParseContext*)	241	88	36.51%
google::protobuf::FileOptions::_InternalSerialize(unsignedchar*,google::protobuf::io::EpsCopyOutputStream*)const	139	76	54.67%
google::protobuf::FieldOptions::_InternalParse(charconst*,google::protobuf::internal::ParseContext*)	111	28	25.22%
google::protobuf::FieldOptions::_InternalSerialize(unsignedchar*,google::protobuf::io::EpsCopyOutputStream*)const	48	24	50.0%
google::protobuf::Reflection::FieldSize(google::protobuf::Messageconst&,google::protobuf::FieldDescriptorconst*)const	38	15	39.47%
google::protobuf::Reflection::ClearOneof(google::protobuf::Message*,google::protobuf::OneofDescriptorconst*)const	31	5	16.12%
google::protobuf::internal::IsDescendant(google::protobuf::Message&,google::protobuf::Messageconst&)	37	7	18.91%
google::protobuf::Reflection::HasBit(google::protobuf::Messageconst&,google::protobuf::FieldDescriptorconst*)const	50	5	10.0%
google::protobuf::internal::EpsCopyInputStream::NextBuffer(int,int)	41	11	26.82%
google::protobuf::internal::(anonymousnamespace)::UTF8GenericScan(google::protobuf::internal::UTF8StateMachineObjconst*,charconst*,int,int*)	72	3	4.166%
google::protobuf::TextFormat::Parser::ParserImpl::ConsumeField(google::protobuf::Message*)	199	82	41.20%
google::protobuf::TextFormat::Parser::ParserImpl::SkipFieldValue()	53	24	45.28%
google::protobuf::TextFormat::Parser::ParserImpl::ConsumeFieldValue(google::protobuf::Message*,google::protobuf::Reflectionconst*,google::protobuf::FieldDescriptorconst*)	118	44	37.28%
voidprotobuf_mutator::FieldFunction ::operator() (protobuf_mutator::FieldInstanceconst&)const	39	16	41.02%
lua_grammar::Expression::MergeImpl(google::protobuf::Message&,google::protobuf::Messageconst&)	62	12	19.35%
lua_grammar::BinaryOperator::MergeImpl(google::protobuf::Message&,google::protobuf::Messageconst&)	97	12	12.37%

This section shows which files and directories are considered in this report. The main reason for showing this is fuzz introspector may include more code in the reasoning than is desired. This section helps identify if too many files/directories are included, e.g. third party code, which may be irrelevant for the threat model. In the event too much is included, fuzz introspector supports a configuration file that can exclude data from the report. See the following link for more information on how to create a config file: link

Files in report

Source file	Reached by	Covered by
	[]	[]
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lobject.c	['lua_stringtonumber_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']	['lua_stringtonumber_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']
/usr/local/bin/../include/c++/v1/stdexcept	[]	[]
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lapi.c	['lua_stringtonumber_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']	['lua_stringtonumber_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lundump.c	['luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']	['luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_dostring_test.c	['luaL_dostring_test']	['luaL_dostring_test']
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lmathlib.c	[]	[]
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lgc.c	['lua_stringtonumber_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']	['lua_stringtonumber_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstrlib.c	[]	[]
/src/testdir/tests/capi/lua_load_test.cc	['lua_load_test']	['lua_load_test']
/src/fuzz_lua.c	['fuzz_lua']	['fuzz_lua']
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lfunc.c	['lua_stringtonumber_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']	['lua_stringtonumber_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/loadlib.c	[]	[]
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_traceback_test.c	['luaL_traceback_test']	['luaL_traceback_test']
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/llex.c	['lua_stringtonumber_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']	['lua_stringtonumber_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldo.c	['lua_stringtonumber_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']	['lua_stringtonumber_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltable.c	['lua_stringtonumber_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']	['lua_stringtonumber_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_loadstring_test.c	['luaL_loadstring_test']	['luaL_loadstring_test']
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldump.c	['lua_dump_test']	['lua_dump_test']
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_loadbufferx_test.c	['luaL_loadbufferx_test']	['luaL_loadbufferx_test']
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_gsub_test.cc	['luaL_gsub_test']	['luaL_gsub_test']
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lbaselib.c	[]	[]
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_loadbuffer_proto/serializer.cc	['luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']	['luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lmem.c	['lua_stringtonumber_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']	['lua_stringtonumber_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_bufflen_test.c	['luaL_bufflen_test']	['luaL_bufflen_test']
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/liolib.c	[]	[]
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_loadbuffer_proto/luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test.cc	['luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']	['luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_loadbuffer_test.c	['luaL_loadbuffer_test']	['luaL_loadbuffer_test']
/src/testdir/tests/capi/lua_stringtonumber_test.c	['lua_stringtonumber_test']	['lua_stringtonumber_test']
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lzio.c	['luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']	['luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lcode.c	['luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']	['luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstate.c	['lua_stringtonumber_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']	['lua_stringtonumber_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lstring.c	['lua_stringtonumber_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']	['lua_stringtonumber_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lutf8lib.c	[]	[]
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltm.c	['lua_stringtonumber_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']	['lua_stringtonumber_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ltablib.c	[]	[]
/src/testdir/tests/capi/lua_dump_test.c	['lua_dump_test']	['lua_dump_test']
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_buffsub_test.cc	['luaL_buffsub_test']	['luaL_buffsub_test']
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lparser.c	['luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']	['luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lopcodes.c	['lua_stringtonumber_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']	['luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldebug.c	['lua_stringtonumber_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']	['luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/ldblib.c	[]	[]
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_addgsub_test.cc	['luaL_addgsub_test']	['luaL_addgsub_test']
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/loslib.c	[]	[]
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lvm.c	['lua_stringtonumber_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']	['lua_stringtonumber_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lauxlib.c	['lua_stringtonumber_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']	['lua_stringtonumber_test', 'luaL_bufflen_test', 'luaL_traceback_test', 'luaL_buffaddr_test', 'luaL_buffsub_test', 'luaL_gsub_test', 'luaL_loadbufferx_test', 'lua_dump_test', 'fuzz_lua', 'luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'torture_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'luaL_addgsub_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']
/src/testdir/tests/capi/torture_test.cc	['torture_test']	['torture_test']
/usr/local/bin/../include/c++/v1/string	[]	[]
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/lcorolib.c	[]	[]
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/linit.c	['luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']	['luaL_dostring_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_test', 'luaL_loadstring_test', 'lua_load_test', 'luaL_loadbuffer_proto_test']
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_buffaddr_test.c	['luaL_buffaddr_test']	['luaL_buffaddr_test']

Directories in report

Directory
/src/
/src/testdir/build/lua-master/source/
/src/testdir/tests/capi/
/src/testdir/tests/capi/luaL_loadbuffer_proto/
/usr/local/bin/../include/c++/v1/