Fuzz introspector
For issues and ideas: https://github.com/ossf/fuzz-introspector/issues

Project functions overview

The following table shows data about each function in the project. The functions included in this table correspond to all functions that exist in the executables of the fuzzers. As such, there may be functions that are from third-party libraries.

For further technical details on the meaning of columns in the below table, please see the Glossary .

Func name Functions filename Args Function call depth Reached by Fuzzers Runtime reached by Fuzzers Combined reached by Fuzzers Fuzzers runtime hit Func lines hit % I Count BB Count Cyclomatic complexity Functions reached Reached by functions Accumulated cyclomatic complexity Undiscovered complexity

Fuzzer details

Fuzzer: fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is
Color Runtime hitcount Callsite count Percentage
red 0 139 53.8%
gold [1:9] 0 0.0%
yellow [10:29] 0 0.0%
greenyellow [30:49] 0 0.0%
lawngreen 50+ 119 46.1%
All colors 258 100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked Calltree index Parent function Callsite Largest blocked function
29 88 model_signing.hashing.Config.hash call site: 00088 model_signing.hashing.Config._build_sharded_file_hasher_factory._factory
21 236 model_signing.verifying.Config.verify call site: 00236 model_signing.verifying.Config._get_manifest_diff
16 133 model_signing._signing.sign_sigstore_pb.pae call site: 00133 model_signing._signing.sign_pkcs11.CertSigner._get_verification_material
9 168 model_signing._signing.sign_ec_key.Signer.sign call site: 00168 model_signing._signing.sign_certificate.Signer._get_verification_material
9 219 model_signing.verifying.Config._guess_hashing_config call site: 00219 model_signing.hashing.Config.use_shard_serialization
8 46 model_signing.hashing.Config.hash call site: 00046 model_signing.hashing.Config._build_sharded_file_hasher_factory._factory
8 151 model_signing.signing.Config.sign call site: 00151 model_signing._signing.sign_sigstore.Signer._get_identity_token
7 33 ...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key.TestOneInput call site: 00033 model_signing.signing.Config.use_sigstore_signer
5 187 ...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key.TestOneInput call site: 00187 model_signing._signing.sign_sigstore.Signature.read
4 82 model_signing._serialization.file.Serializer.serialize call site: 00082 .list
4 162 model_signing._signing.sign_ec_key.Signer.sign call site: 00162 model_signing._signing.sign_sigstore_pb.pae
4 203 model_signing.manifest.SerializationType.from_args call site: 00203 bytes.fromhex

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions
368
Functions that are reachable but not covered
99
Reachable functions
151
Percentage of reachable functions covered
34.44%
NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.
Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.
Function name source code lines source lines hit percentage hit

Files reached

filename functions hit
/ 1
...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key 15
model_signing.signing 12
model_signing.hashing 21
model_signing._serialization.file 22
model_signing._hashing.memory 2
model_signing.manifest 3
model_signing._signing.sign_ec_key 12
model_signing._signing.sign_sigstore 16
model_signing._serialization.file_shard 27
model_signing._hashing.io 2
model_signing._serialization.serialization 5
model_signing._signing.signing 18
model_signing._signing.sign_pkcs11 18
model_signing._signing.sign_sigstore_pb 1
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric.ec 1
model_signing._signing.sign_certificate 6
model_signing.verifying 18

Fuzzer: fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is
Color Runtime hitcount Callsite count Percentage
red 0 104 56.5%
gold [1:9] 0 0.0%
yellow [10:29] 0 0.0%
greenyellow [30:49] 0 0.0%
lawngreen 50+ 80 43.4%
All colors 184 100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked Calltree index Parent function Callsite Largest blocked function
29 91 model_signing.hashing.Config.hash call site: 00091 model_signing.hashing.Config._build_sharded_file_hasher_factory._factory
19 161 model_signing.signing.Config.sign call site: 00161 model_signing._signing.sign_pkcs11.CertSigner._get_verification_material
9 141 model_signing._signing.sign_ec_key.Signer.sign call site: 00141 model_signing._signing.sign_certificate.Signer._get_verification_material
8 35 model_signing._signing.sign_ec_key.Signer.__init__ call site: 00035 model_signing.signing.Config.sign
8 49 model_signing.hashing.Config.hash call site: 00049 model_signing.hashing.Config._build_sharded_file_hasher_factory._factory
8 151 model_signing.signing.Config.sign call site: 00151 model_signing._signing.sign_sigstore.Signer._get_identity_token
4 85 model_signing._serialization.file.Serializer.serialize call site: 00085 .list
3 7 ...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key.TestOneInput call site: 00007 .open
3 136 model_signing._signing.sign_sigstore_pb.pae call site: 00136 cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric.ec.ECDSA.__init__
2 1 ...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key.TestOneInput call site: 00001 fdp.ConsumeIntInRange
2 4 ...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key.TestOneInput call site: 00004 tempfile.TemporaryDirectory
2 13 ...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key.TestOneInput call site: 00013 model_signing.signing.Config.__init__

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions
367
Functions that are reachable but not covered
79
Reachable functions
119
Percentage of reachable functions covered
33.61%
NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.
Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.
Function name source code lines source lines hit percentage hit

Files reached

filename functions hit
/ 1
...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key 11
model_signing.signing 12
model_signing.hashing 17
model_signing._serialization.file 22
model_signing._hashing.memory 2
model_signing.manifest 2
model_signing._signing.sign_ec_key 11
model_signing._signing.sign_sigstore 12
model_signing._serialization.file_shard 27
model_signing._hashing.io 2
model_signing._serialization.serialization 5
model_signing._signing.signing 7
model_signing._signing.sign_sigstore_pb 2
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric.ec 1
model_signing._signing.sign_certificate 6
model_signing._signing.sign_pkcs11 18

Fuzzer: fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is
Color Runtime hitcount Callsite count Percentage
red 0 159 58.8%
gold [1:9] 0 0.0%
yellow [10:29] 0 0.0%
greenyellow [30:49] 0 0.0%
lawngreen 50+ 111 41.1%
All colors 270 100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked Calltree index Parent function Callsite Largest blocked function
29 87 model_signing.hashing.Config.hash call site: 00087 model_signing.hashing.Config._build_sharded_file_hasher_factory._factory
21 132 model_signing._signing.sign_sigstore_pb.pae call site: 00132 model_signing._signing.sign_pkcs11.CertSigner._get_verification_material
21 248 model_signing.verifying.Config.verify call site: 00248 model_signing.verifying.Config._get_manifest_diff
10 0 EP call site: 00000 atheris.FuzzedDataProvider
9 176 model_signing._signing.sign_ec_key.Signer._get_verification_material call site: 00176 model_signing._signing.sign_certificate.Signer._get_verification_material
9 231 model_signing.verifying.Config._guess_hashing_config call site: 00231 model_signing.hashing.Config.use_shard_serialization
8 49 model_signing.hashing.Config.hash call site: 00049 model_signing.hashing.Config._build_sharded_file_hasher_factory._factory
8 154 model_signing.signing.Config.sign call site: 00154 model_signing._signing.sign_sigstore.Signer._get_identity_token
7 32 ...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key.TestOneInput call site: 00032 model_signing.signing.Config.use_sigstore_signer
5 200 ...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key.TestOneInput call site: 00200 model_signing._signing.sign_sigstore.Signature.read
4 81 model_signing._serialization.file.Serializer.serialize call site: 00081 .list
4 165 model_signing._signing.sign_ec_key.Signer.sign call site: 00165 model_signing._signing.sign_sigstore_pb.pae

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions
368
Functions that are reachable but not covered
100
Reachable functions
154
Percentage of reachable functions covered
35.06%
NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.
Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.
Function name source code lines source lines hit percentage hit

Files reached

filename functions hit
/ 1
...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key 13
model_signing.signing 12
model_signing.hashing 21
model_signing._serialization.file 22
model_signing._hashing.memory 2
model_signing.manifest 3
model_signing._signing.sign_ec_key 17
model_signing._signing.sign_sigstore 17
model_signing._serialization.file_shard 27
model_signing._hashing.io 2
model_signing._serialization.serialization 5
model_signing._signing.signing 17
model_signing._signing.sign_pkcs11 22
model_signing._signing.sign_sigstore_pb 1
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric.ec 1
model_signing._signing.sign_certificate 6
model_signing.verifying 18

Analyses and suggestions

Optimal target analysis

Remaining optimal interesting functions

The following table shows a list of functions that are optimal targets. Optimal targets are identified by finding the functions that in combination, yield a high code coverage.

Func name Functions filename Arg count Args Function depth hitcount instr count bb count cyclomatic complexity Reachable functions Incoming references total cyclomatic complexity Unreached complexity
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.serialization.ssh.SSHCertificateBuilder.sign cryptography.hazmat.primitives.serialization.ssh 2 ['N/A', 'N/A'] 5 0 37 11 7 53 0 177 165
model_signing._signing.pkcs11uri.Pkcs11URI.login model_signing._signing.pkcs11uri 1 ['N/A'] 3 0 2 4 5 31 3 108 96
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.serialization.ssh.load_ssh_private_key cryptography.hazmat.primitives.serialization.ssh 4 ['N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A'] 3 0 12 15 9 35 0 116 82
cryptography.x509.name._RFC4514NameParser._parse_na cryptography.x509.name 1 ['N/A'] 4 0 1 2 4 18 3 62 53
cryptography.fernet.Fernet._decrypt_data cryptography.fernet 4 ['N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A'] 4 0 1 3 4 25 2 81 50
model_signing._signing.pkcs11uri.Pkcs11URI.parse model_signing._signing.pkcs11uri 2 ['N/A', 'N/A'] 2 0 5 5 5 17 3 59 43
model_signing._signing.sign_certificate.Verifier._verify_certificates model_signing._signing.sign_certificate 3 ['N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A'] 2 0 5 4 5 10 2 35 35

Implementing fuzzers that target the above functions will improve reachability such that it becomes:

Functions statically reachable by fuzzers
11.0%
127 / 1112
Cyclomatic complexity statically reachable by fuzzers
12.0%
443 / 3558

All functions overview

If you implement fuzzers for these functions, the status of all functions in the project will be:

Func name Functions filename Args Function call depth Reached by Fuzzers Runtime reached by Fuzzers Combined reached by Fuzzers Fuzzers runtime hit Func lines hit % I Count BB Count Cyclomatic complexity Functions reached Reached by functions Accumulated cyclomatic complexity Undiscovered complexity

Fuzz engine guidance

This sections provides heuristics that can be used as input to a fuzz engine when running a given fuzz target. The current focus is on providing input that is usable by libFuzzer.

/src/model-transparency/tests/fuzzing/fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key.py

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag


Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['model_signing.hashing.Config.hash', 'model_signing.verifying.Config.verify', 'model_signing._signing.sign_sigstore_pb.pae', 'model_signing._signing.sign_ec_key.Signer.sign', 'model_signing.verifying.Config._guess_hashing_config', 'model_signing.signing.Config.sign', '...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key.TestOneInput', 'model_signing._serialization.file.Serializer.serialize']

/src/model-transparency/tests/fuzzing/fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key.py

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag


Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['model_signing.hashing.Config.hash', 'model_signing.signing.Config.sign', 'model_signing._signing.sign_ec_key.Signer.sign', 'model_signing._signing.sign_ec_key.Signer.__init__', 'model_signing._serialization.file.Serializer.serialize', '...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key.TestOneInput', 'model_signing._signing.sign_sigstore_pb.pae']

/src/model-transparency/tests/fuzzing/fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key.py

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag


Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['model_signing.hashing.Config.hash', 'model_signing._signing.sign_sigstore_pb.pae', 'model_signing.verifying.Config.verify', 'model_signing._signing.sign_ec_key.Signer._get_verification_material', 'model_signing.verifying.Config._guess_hashing_config', 'model_signing.signing.Config.sign', '...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key.TestOneInput']

Runtime coverage analysis

This section shows analysis of runtime coverage data.

For futher technical details on how this section is generated, please see the Glossary .

Complex functions with low coverage

Func name Function total lines Lines covered at runtime percentage covered Reached by fuzzers
os.path.isdir 290 131 45.17% ['fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key']
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.serialization.ssh.load_ssh_private_key 68 0 0.0% []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.serialization.ssh._serialize_ssh_private_key 52 5 9.615% ['fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key']
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.serialization.ssh._load_ssh_public_identity 56 0 0.0% []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.serialization.ssh.SSHCertificateBuilder.sign 85 0 0.0% []
re.match 2168 465 21.44% ['fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key']
val.to_bytes 91 38 41.75% ['fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key']
point.tobytes 95 43 45.26% ['fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key']
typing_extensions.override 1709 555 32.47% ['fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key']
resources.append 1640 2 0.121% ['fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key']
statement.Statement 31 13 41.93% ['fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key']
asn1crypto.keys.PublicKeyInfo.dump 350 177 50.57% ['fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key']
google.protobuf.json_format.MessageToJson 492 133 27.03% ['fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key']
hash.finalize 73 27 36.98% ['fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key']
i.isdigit 141 16 11.34% ['fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key']
OpenSSL.crypto.X509StoreContext 880 207 23.52% ['fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key']
signer.sign_dsse 84 30 35.71% ['fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key']
p.is_absolute 46 21 45.65% ['fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key']
r.pop 109 13 11.92% ['fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key']

Files and Directories in report

This section shows which files and directories are considered in this report. The main reason for showing this is fuzz introspector may include more code in the reasoning than is desired. This section helps identify if too many files/directories are included, e.g. third party code, which may be irrelevant for the threat model. In the event too much is included, fuzz introspector supports a configuration file that can exclude data from the report. See the following link for more information on how to create a config file: link

Files in report

Source file Reached by Covered by
[] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.cmac [] []
model_signing._signing.sign_pkcs11 ['fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key'] []
PyKCS11 [] []
random [] []
cryptography.hazmat.bindings._rust [] []
...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key ['fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key'] []
...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key ['fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key'] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.kdf.hkdf [] []
cryptography.hazmat.decrepit.ciphers.algorithms [] []
json [] []
model_signing._signing.sign_sigstore_pb ['fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key'] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.padding [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric.ed25519 [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.twofactor [] []
cryptography.hazmat.backends.openssl.backend [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.kdf.argon2 [] []
shutil [] []
cryptography.x509.ocsp [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.serialization [] []
hashlib [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.serialization.ssh [] []
model_signing.hashing ['fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key'] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.kdf.x963kdf [] []
model_signing.manifest ['fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key'] []
hmac [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.kdf [] []
sigstore [] []
threading [] []
stat [] []
cryptography.fernet [] []
model_signing [] []
asn1crypto [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.kdf.concatkdf [] []
model_signing._hashing.memory ['fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key'] []
cryptography [] []
model_signing._cli [] []
sigstore_protobuf_specs [] []
itertools [] []
model_signing.__main__ [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric.ec ['fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key'] []
model_signing._serialization.file_shard ['fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key'] []
atexit [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives._cipheralgorithm [] []
model_signing.verifying ['fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key'] []
re [] []
model_signing._signing.sign_sigstore ['fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key'] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.twofactor.hotp [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric.dh [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric.dsa [] []
cryptography.x509.oid [] []
cryptography.hazmat [] []
model_signing._hashing.io ['fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key'] []
cryptography.exceptions [] []
cryptography.x509.name [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.hmac [] []
cryptography.x509 [] []
cryptography.hazmat._oid [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.twofactor.totp [] []
cryptography.x509.verification [] []
logging [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric.types [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric.utils [] []
urllib [] []
[] []
opentelemetry [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.ciphers.modes [] []
io [] []
model_signing._hashing [] []
cryptography.x509.extensions [] []
model_signing._signing [] []
OpenSSL [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric.padding [] []
email [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.serialization.pkcs12 [] []
cryptography.hazmat.bindings.openssl.binding [] []
...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key ['fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key'] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric.rsa [] []
tempfile [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.ciphers.algorithms [] []
base64 [] []
cryptography.hazmat.decrepit [] []
model_signing._signing.sign_ec_key ['fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key'] []
glob [] []
math [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.constant_time [] []
cryptography.hazmat.bindings.openssl._conditional [] []
cryptography.hazmat.backends [] []
warnings [] []
google [] []
cryptography.hazmat.bindings [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.kdf.kbkdf [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.ciphers.aead [] []
cryptography.hazmat.backends.openssl [] []
cryptography.x509.base [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.poly1305 [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.keywrap [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric.x25519 [] []
pathlib [] []
binascii [] []
types [] []
certifi [] []
model_signing.signing ['fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key'] []
cryptography.hazmat.bindings.openssl [] []
model_signing._hashing.hashing [] []
sys [] []
cryptography.x509.general_name [] []
datetime [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric.ed448 [] []
cryptography.x509.certificate_transparency [] []
click [] []
model_signing._signing.pkcs11uri [] []
model_signing._signing.sign_certificate ['fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key'] []
time [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.serialization.base [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives._asymmetric [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric [] []
model_signing._serialization [] []
typing [] []
model_signing._signing.signing ['fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key'] []
atheris [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.ciphers.base [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.serialization.pkcs7 [] []
model_signing._serialization.file ['fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key'] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.kdf.scrypt [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives._serialization [] []
cryptography.hazmat.decrepit.ciphers [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.kdf.pbkdf2 [] []
bcrypt [] []
os [] []
cryptography.__about__ [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.hashes [] []
model_signing._serialization.serialization ['fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key'] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric.x448 [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.ciphers [] []
cryptography.utils [] []

Directories in report

Directory