Fuzz introspector
For issues and ideas: https://github.com/ossf/fuzz-introspector/issues
Report generation date: 2025-11-11

Project overview: model-transparency

High level conclusions

Reachability and coverage overview

Functions statically reachable by fuzzers
11.0%
158 / 1390
Cyclomatic complexity statically reachable by fuzzers
12.0%
549 / 4507
Runtime code coverage of functions
26.0%
368 / 1390

Warning: The number of runtime covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that Fuzz Introspector found there are more functions covered at runtime than what is considered reachable based on the static analysis. This is a limitation in the analysis as anything covered at runtime is by definition reachable by the fuzzers.
This is likely due to a limitation in the static analysis. In this case, the count of functions covered at runtime is the true value, which means this is what should be considered "achieved" by the fuzzer.

Use the project functions table below to query all functions that were not covered at runtime.

Project functions overview

The following table shows data about each function in the project. The functions included in this table correspond to all functions that exist in the executables of the fuzzers. As such, there may be functions that are from third-party libraries.

For further technical details on the meaning of columns in the below table, please see the Glossary .

Func name Functions filename Args Function call depth Reached by Fuzzers Runtime reached by Fuzzers Combined reached by Fuzzers Fuzzers runtime hit Func lines hit % I Count BB Count Cyclomatic complexity Functions reached Reached by functions Accumulated cyclomatic complexity Undiscovered complexity

Fuzzer details

Fuzzer: fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is
Color Runtime hitcount Callsite count Percentage
red 0 14 77.7%
gold [1:9] 0 0.0%
yellow [10:29] 0 0.0%
greenyellow [30:49] 0 0.0%
lawngreen 50+ 4 22.2%
All colors 18 100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked Calltree index Parent function Callsite Largest blocked function
5 8 ...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key.TestOneInput call site: 00008 os.path.join
3 0 EP call site: 00000 atheris.FuzzedDataProvider
3 4 ...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key.TestOneInput call site: 00004 tempfile.TemporaryDirectory
3 14 ...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key.TestOneInput call site: 00014 scfg.set_hashing_config

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions
458
Functions that are reachable but not covered
16
Reachable functions
16
Percentage of reachable functions covered
0.0%
NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.
Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.
Function name source code lines source lines hit percentage hit

Files reached

filename functions hit
/ 1
...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key 15

Fuzzer: fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is
Color Runtime hitcount Callsite count Percentage
red 0 353 64.2%
gold [1:9] 0 0.0%
yellow [10:29] 0 0.0%
greenyellow [30:49] 0 0.0%
lawngreen 50+ 196 35.7%
All colors 549 100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked Calltree index Parent function Callsite Largest blocked function
41 231 sigstore.oidc.IdentityToken.__init__ call site: 00231 sigstore.oidc.Issuer.identity_token
38 349 model_signing._signing.signing.Verifier.verify call site: 00349 sigstore.verify.verifier.Verifier.verify_dsse
30 457 sigstore._utils.sha256_digest call site: 00457 sigstore.verify.verifier._validate_dsse_v001_entry_body
26 81 sigstore._internal.tuf.TrustUpdater.get_signing_config_path call site: 00081 sigstore.models.ClientTrustConfig.from_tuf
26 273 model_signing.signing.Config.sign call site: 00273 model_signing._signing.sign_pkcs11.CertSigner._get_verification_material
25 315 ...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key.TestOneInput call site: 00315 sigstore.models.Bundle.__init__
24 432 sigstore.verify.policy._SingleX509ExtPolicy.verify call site: 00432 sigstore.verify.verifier._validate_dsse_v002_entry_body
23 56 sigstore._internal.tuf.TrustUpdater.__init__ call site: 00056 sigstore._internal.tuf.TrustUpdater.get_trusted_root_path
19 388 sigstore._internal.sct._get_signed_certificate_timestamp call site: 00388 sigstore._internal.sct._pack_digitally_signed
16 415 sigstore._internal.sct._pack_signed_entry call site: 00415 sigstore.verify.policy.Identity.verify
6 1 ...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key.TestOneInput call site: 00001 fdp.ConsumeIntInRange
6 44 sigstore._internal.tuf.TrustUpdater.__init__ call site: 00044 sigstore._internal.tuf._get_dirs

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions
493
Functions that are reachable but not covered
241
Reachable functions
322
Percentage of reachable functions covered
25.16%
NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.
Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.
Function name source code lines source lines hit percentage hit

Files reached

filename functions hit
/ 1
...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key 20
model_signing.signing 12
model_signing.hashing 23
model_signing._serialization.file 22
model_signing._hashing.io 3
model_signing._hashing.memory 3
model_signing.manifest 3
model_signing._signing.sign_ec_key 18
model_signing._signing.sign_sigstore 20
sigstore.models 23
sigstore._internal.tuf 20
sigstore._utils 18
sigstore.oidc 26
sigstore.sign 4
model_signing._serialization.file_shard 27
model_signing._serialization.serialization 5
model_signing._signing.signing 18
model_signing._signing.sign_sigstore_pb 6
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric.ec 1
model_signing._signing.sign_certificate 7
sigstore.dsse 7
sigstore._internal.oidc.oauth 9
model_signing._signing.sign_pkcs11 23
model_signing.verifying 20
sigstore.verify.verifier 47
sigstore._internal.sct 26
sigstore.verify.policy 8

Fuzzer: fuzz_with_cert_chain

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is
Color Runtime hitcount Callsite count Percentage
red 0 292 71.3%
gold [1:9] 0 0.0%
yellow [10:29] 0 0.0%
greenyellow [30:49] 0 0.0%
lawngreen 50+ 117 28.6%
All colors 409 100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked Calltree index Parent function Callsite Largest blocked function
60 115 cryptography.x509.extensions.AuthorityKeyIdentifier.__init__ call site: 00115 model_signing.verifying.Config.use_certificate_verifier
38 221 model_signing._signing.signing.Verifier.verify call site: 00221 sigstore.verify.verifier.Verifier.verify_dsse
30 330 sigstore._utils.sha256_digest call site: 00330 sigstore.verify.verifier._validate_dsse_v001_entry_body
28 184 model_signing._signing.sign_certificate.Verifier.__init__ call site: 00184 model_signing.verifying.Config.verify
25 304 sigstore.verify.policy._SingleX509ExtPolicy.verify call site: 00304 sigstore.verify.verifier._validate_dsse_v002_entry_body
19 260 sigstore._internal.sct._get_signed_certificate_timestamp call site: 00260 sigstore._internal.sct._pack_digitally_signed
18 92 ...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_with_cert_chain._pick_sig_hash call site: 00092 ...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_with_cert_chain.gen_name
16 287 sigstore._internal.sct._pack_signed_entry call site: 00287 sigstore.verify.policy.Identity.verify
5 0 EP call site: 00000 ...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_with_cert_chain.build_valid_chain
4 85 cryptography.x509.extensions.SubjectKeyIdentifier.from_public_key call site: 00085 cryptography.x509.base.CertificateBuilder.sign
4 365 model_signing.manifest.SerializationType.from_args call site: 00365 bytes.fromhex
4 379 model_signing._signing.signing.dsse_payload_to_manifest call site: 00379 model_signing.verifying.Config._guess_hashing_config

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions
497
Functions that are reachable but not covered
154
Reachable functions
212
Percentage of reachable functions covered
27.36%
NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.
Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.
Function name source code lines source lines hit percentage hit

Files reached

filename functions hit
/ 1
...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_with_cert_chain 57
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric.rsa 2
cryptography.x509.base 10
cryptography.x509.extensions 9
model_signing.verifying 15
model_signing._signing.sign_certificate 8
model_signing._signing.sign_sigstore 5
sigstore.models 12
sigstore._utils 15
model_signing._signing.sign_sigstore_pb 4
model_signing._signing.signing 14
sigstore.verify.verifier 47
sigstore._internal.sct 26
sigstore.verify.policy 8
sigstore.dsse 4
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric.ec 1
model_signing.manifest 3
model_signing._hashing.memory 1

Fuzzer: fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is
Color Runtime hitcount Callsite count Percentage
red 0 175 69.1%
gold [1:9] 0 0.0%
yellow [10:29] 0 0.0%
greenyellow [30:49] 0 0.0%
lawngreen 50+ 78 30.8%
All colors 253 100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked Calltree index Parent function Callsite Largest blocked function
38 65 model_signing._signing.signing.Verifier.verify call site: 00065 sigstore.verify.verifier.Verifier.verify_dsse
30 174 sigstore._utils.sha256_digest call site: 00174 sigstore.verify.verifier._validate_dsse_v001_entry_body
25 32 ...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key.TestOneInput call site: 00032 sigstore.models.Bundle.__init__
25 148 sigstore.verify.policy._SingleX509ExtPolicy.verify call site: 00148 sigstore.verify.verifier._validate_dsse_v002_entry_body
19 104 sigstore._internal.sct._get_signed_certificate_timestamp call site: 00104 sigstore._internal.sct._pack_digitally_signed
16 131 sigstore._internal.sct._pack_signed_entry call site: 00131 sigstore.verify.policy.Identity.verify
4 209 model_signing.manifest.SerializationType.from_args call site: 00209 bytes.fromhex
3 223 model_signing._signing.signing.dsse_payload_to_manifest call site: 00223 model_signing.verifying.Config._guess_hashing_config
2 1 ...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key.TestOneInput call site: 00001 tempfile.TemporaryDirectory
2 125 sigstore._internal.sct._pack_signed_entry call site: 00125 .len
2 206 model_signing._signing.signing.Verifier.verify call site: 00206 model_signing._signing.signing.dsse_payload_to_manifest_compat
2 232 model_signing.verifying.Config.verify call site: 00232 model_signing.manifest.Manifest.resource_descriptors

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions
493
Functions that are reachable but not covered
126
Reachable functions
158
Percentage of reachable functions covered
20.25%
NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.
Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.
Function name source code lines source lines hit percentage hit

Files reached

filename functions hit
/ 1
...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key 24
model_signing.verifying 17
model_signing._signing.sign_ec_key 2
model_signing._signing.sign_sigstore 5
sigstore.models 12
sigstore._utils 15
model_signing._signing.sign_sigstore_pb 4
model_signing._signing.signing 13
sigstore.verify.verifier 47
sigstore._internal.sct 26
sigstore.verify.policy 8
sigstore.dsse 4
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric.ec 1
model_signing.manifest 3
model_signing._hashing.memory 1

Fuzzer: fuzz_simple_sigstore

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is
Color Runtime hitcount Callsite count Percentage
red 0 268 61.8%
gold [1:9] 0 0.0%
yellow [10:29] 0 0.0%
greenyellow [30:49] 0 0.0%
lawngreen 50+ 165 38.1%
All colors 433 100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked Calltree index Parent function Callsite Largest blocked function
38 136 model_signing._signing.signing.Verifier.verify call site: 00136 sigstore.verify.verifier.Verifier.verify_dsse
30 245 sigstore._utils.sha256_digest call site: 00245 sigstore.verify.verifier._validate_dsse_v001_entry_body
25 103 ...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_simple_sigstore.TestOneInput call site: 00103 sigstore.models.Bundle.__init__
25 219 sigstore.verify.policy._SingleX509ExtPolicy.verify call site: 00219 sigstore.verify.verifier._validate_dsse_v002_entry_body
23 65 sigstore._internal.tuf.TrustUpdater.__init__ call site: 00065 sigstore._internal.tuf.TrustUpdater.get_trusted_root_path
19 175 sigstore._internal.sct._get_signed_certificate_timestamp call site: 00175 sigstore._internal.sct._pack_digitally_signed
16 202 sigstore._internal.sct._pack_signed_entry call site: 00202 sigstore.verify.policy.Identity.verify
15 1 ...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_simple_sigstore.TestOneInput call site: 00001 sigstore.models.TrustedRoot.from_file
12 90 sigstore._internal.tuf.TrustUpdater.get_signing_config_path call site: 00090 sigstore.models.ClientTrustConfig.from_tuf
9 43 ...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_simple_sigstore.TestOneInput call site: 00043 sigstore.models.ClientTrustConfig.from_tuf
6 53 sigstore._internal.tuf.TrustUpdater.__init__ call site: 00053 sigstore._internal.tuf._get_dirs
5 312 model_signing.manifest._FileSerialization.__init__ call site: 00312 model_signing.hashing.Config.use_shard_serialization

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions
494
Functions that are reachable but not covered
191
Reachable functions
250
Percentage of reachable functions covered
23.6%
NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.
Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.
Function name source code lines source lines hit percentage hit

Files reached

filename functions hit
/ 1
...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_simple_sigstore 25
sigstore.models 25
model_signing.verifying 20
model_signing._signing.sign_sigstore 10
sigstore._internal.tuf 20
sigstore._utils 18
sigstore.verify.policy 9
model_signing._signing.sign_sigstore_pb 4
model_signing._signing.signing 13
sigstore.verify.verifier 47
sigstore._internal.sct 26
sigstore.dsse 4
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric.ec 1
model_signing.manifest 3
model_signing._hashing.memory 3
model_signing.hashing 23
model_signing._serialization.file 22
model_signing._hashing.io 3
model_signing._serialization.file_shard 27
model_signing._serialization.serialization 5

Fuzzer: fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is
Color Runtime hitcount Callsite count Percentage
red 0 197 55.6%
gold [1:9] 0 0.0%
yellow [10:29] 0 0.0%
greenyellow [30:49] 0 0.0%
lawngreen 50+ 157 44.3%
All colors 354 100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked Calltree index Parent function Callsite Largest blocked function
38 57 model_signing._signing.signing.Verifier.verify call site: 00057 sigstore.verify.verifier.Verifier.verify_dsse
30 166 sigstore._utils.sha256_digest call site: 00166 sigstore.verify.verifier._validate_dsse_v001_entry_body
25 23 ...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key.TestOneInput call site: 00023 sigstore.models.Bundle.__init__
25 140 sigstore.verify.policy._SingleX509ExtPolicy.verify call site: 00140 sigstore.verify.verifier._validate_dsse_v002_entry_body
19 96 sigstore._internal.sct._get_signed_certificate_timestamp call site: 00096 sigstore._internal.sct._pack_digitally_signed
16 123 sigstore._internal.sct._pack_signed_entry call site: 00123 sigstore.verify.policy.Identity.verify
5 233 model_signing.manifest._FileSerialization.__init__ call site: 00233 model_signing.hashing.Config.use_shard_serialization
4 201 model_signing.manifest.SerializationType.from_args call site: 00201 bytes.fromhex
4 302 model_signing._serialization.file_shard.Serializer.serialize call site: 00302 .list
4 326 model_signing._serialization.file.Serializer.serialize call site: 00326 .list
2 1 ...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key.TestOneInput call site: 00001 tempfile.TemporaryDirectory
2 117 sigstore._internal.sct._pack_signed_entry call site: 00117 .len

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions
493
Functions that are reachable but not covered
150
Reachable functions
209
Percentage of reachable functions covered
28.23%
NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.
Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.
Function name source code lines source lines hit percentage hit

Files reached

filename functions hit
/ 1
...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key 18
model_signing.verifying 20
model_signing._signing.sign_ec_key 2
model_signing._signing.sign_sigstore 5
sigstore.models 12
sigstore._utils 15
model_signing._signing.sign_sigstore_pb 4
model_signing._signing.signing 14
sigstore.verify.verifier 47
sigstore._internal.sct 26
sigstore.verify.policy 8
sigstore.dsse 4
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric.ec 1
model_signing.manifest 3
model_signing._hashing.memory 3
model_signing.hashing 23
model_signing._serialization.file 22
model_signing._hashing.io 3
model_signing._serialization.file_shard 27
model_signing._serialization.serialization 5

Analyses and suggestions

Optimal target analysis

Remaining optimal interesting functions

The following table shows a list of functions that are optimal targets. Optimal targets are identified by finding the functions that in combination, yield a high code coverage.

Func name Functions filename Arg count Args Function depth hitcount instr count bb count cyclomatic complexity Reachable functions Incoming references total cyclomatic complexity Unreached complexity
sigstore._cli.main sigstore._cli 1 ['N/A'] 7 0 13 13 8 242 1 787 418
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.serialization.ssh.SSHCertificateBuilder.sign cryptography.hazmat.primitives.serialization.ssh 2 ['N/A', 'N/A'] 5 0 37 11 7 52 0 174 141
model_signing._signing.pkcs11uri.Pkcs11URI.login model_signing._signing.pkcs11uri 1 ['N/A'] 4 0 2 4 5 31 2 108 90
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.serialization.ssh.load_ssh_private_key cryptography.hazmat.primitives.serialization.ssh 4 ['N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A'] 4 0 12 15 9 35 0 116 82
cryptography.fernet.Fernet._decrypt_data cryptography.fernet 4 ['N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A'] 3 0 1 3 4 25 2 81 50
sigstore._internal.rekor.checkpoint.verify_checkpoint sigstore._internal.rekor.checkpoint 2 ['N/A', 'N/A'] 2 0 2 2 4 18 1 61 43
model_signing._signing.pkcs11uri.Pkcs11URI.parse model_signing._signing.pkcs11uri 2 ['N/A', 'N/A'] 3 0 5 5 5 17 2 59 40

Implementing fuzzers that target the above functions will improve reachability such that it becomes:

Functions statically reachable by fuzzers
18.0%
248 / 1390
Cyclomatic complexity statically reachable by fuzzers
20.0%
903 / 4507

All functions overview

If you implement fuzzers for these functions, the status of all functions in the project will be:

Func name Functions filename Args Function call depth Reached by Fuzzers Runtime reached by Fuzzers Combined reached by Fuzzers Fuzzers runtime hit Func lines hit % I Count BB Count Cyclomatic complexity Functions reached Reached by functions Accumulated cyclomatic complexity Undiscovered complexity

Fuzz engine guidance

This sections provides heuristics that can be used as input to a fuzz engine when running a given fuzz target. The current focus is on providing input that is usable by libFuzzer.

/src/model-transparency/tests/fuzzing/fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key.py

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag


Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key.TestOneInput']

/src/model-transparency/tests/fuzzing/fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key.py

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag


Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['sigstore.oidc.IdentityToken.__init__', 'model_signing._signing.signing.Verifier.verify', 'sigstore._utils.sha256_digest', 'sigstore._internal.tuf.TrustUpdater.get_signing_config_path', 'model_signing.signing.Config.sign', '...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key.TestOneInput', 'sigstore.verify.policy._SingleX509ExtPolicy.verify', 'sigstore._internal.tuf.TrustUpdater.__init__', 'sigstore._internal.sct._get_signed_certificate_timestamp', 'sigstore._internal.sct._pack_signed_entry']

/src/model-transparency/tests/fuzzing/fuzz_with_cert_chain.py

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag


Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['cryptography.x509.extensions.AuthorityKeyIdentifier.__init__', 'model_signing._signing.signing.Verifier.verify', 'sigstore._utils.sha256_digest', 'model_signing._signing.sign_certificate.Verifier.__init__', 'sigstore.verify.policy._SingleX509ExtPolicy.verify', 'sigstore._internal.sct._get_signed_certificate_timestamp', '...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_with_cert_chain._pick_sig_hash', 'sigstore._internal.sct._pack_signed_entry', 'cryptography.x509.extensions.SubjectKeyIdentifier.from_public_key']

/src/model-transparency/tests/fuzzing/fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key.py

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag


Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['model_signing._signing.signing.Verifier.verify', 'sigstore._utils.sha256_digest', '...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key.TestOneInput', 'sigstore.verify.policy._SingleX509ExtPolicy.verify', 'sigstore._internal.sct._get_signed_certificate_timestamp', 'sigstore._internal.sct._pack_signed_entry', 'model_signing.manifest.SerializationType.from_args', 'model_signing._signing.signing.dsse_payload_to_manifest']

/src/model-transparency/tests/fuzzing/fuzz_simple_sigstore.py

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag


Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['model_signing._signing.signing.Verifier.verify', 'sigstore._utils.sha256_digest', '...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_simple_sigstore.TestOneInput', 'sigstore.verify.policy._SingleX509ExtPolicy.verify', 'sigstore._internal.tuf.TrustUpdater.__init__', 'sigstore._internal.sct._get_signed_certificate_timestamp', 'sigstore._internal.sct._pack_signed_entry', 'sigstore._internal.tuf.TrustUpdater.get_signing_config_path']

/src/model-transparency/tests/fuzzing/fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key.py

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag


Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['model_signing._signing.signing.Verifier.verify', 'sigstore._utils.sha256_digest', '...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key.TestOneInput', 'sigstore.verify.policy._SingleX509ExtPolicy.verify', 'sigstore._internal.sct._get_signed_certificate_timestamp', 'sigstore._internal.sct._pack_signed_entry', 'model_signing.manifest._FileSerialization.__init__', 'model_signing.manifest.SerializationType.from_args', 'model_signing._serialization.file_shard.Serializer.serialize', 'model_signing._serialization.file.Serializer.serialize']

Runtime coverage analysis

This section shows analysis of runtime coverage data.

For futher technical details on how this section is generated, please see the Glossary .

Complex functions with low coverage

Func name Function total lines Lines covered at runtime percentage covered Reached by fuzzers
os.path.isdir 290 131 45.17% ['fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key']
signer.sign_dsse 89 31 34.83% ['fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key']
typing_extensions.dataclass_transform 1714 560 32.67% ['fuzz_simple_sigstore', 'fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_with_cert_chain', 'fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key']
resources.append 1640 2 0.121% ['fuzz_simple_sigstore', 'fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_with_cert_chain', 'fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key']
statement.Statement 31 13 41.93% ['fuzz_simple_sigstore', 'fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_with_cert_chain', 'fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key']
OpenSSL.crypto.X509StoreContext 880 267 30.34% ['fuzz_simple_sigstore', 'fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_with_cert_chain', 'fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key']
re.match 80 15 18.75% ['fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key']
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.serialization.ssh.load_ssh_private_key 68 0 0.0% []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.serialization.ssh._serialize_ssh_private_key 52 5 9.615% ['fuzz_simple_sigstore', 'fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_with_cert_chain', 'fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key']
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.serialization.ssh._load_ssh_public_identity 56 0 0.0% []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.serialization.ssh.SSHCertificateBuilder.sign 85 0 0.0% []
val.to_bytes 91 38 41.75% ['fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key']
point.tobytes 96 43 44.79% ['fuzz_simple_sigstore', 'fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_with_cert_chain', 'fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key']
google.protobuf.json_format.MessageToJson 500 142 28.4% ['fuzz_simple_sigstore', 'fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_with_cert_chain', 'fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key']
asn1crypto.keys.PublicKeyInfo.dump 350 177 50.57% ['fuzz_simple_sigstore', 'fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_with_cert_chain', 'fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key']
asn1crypto.core.OctetString.load 2168 465 21.44% ['fuzz_simple_sigstore', 'fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_with_cert_chain', 'fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key']
hash.finalize 73 27 36.98% ['fuzz_simple_sigstore', 'fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_with_cert_chain', 'fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key']
i.isdigit 141 16 11.34% ['fuzz_simple_sigstore', 'fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_with_cert_chain', 'fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key']
p.is_absolute 46 21 45.65% ['fuzz_simple_sigstore', 'fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_with_cert_chain', 'fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key']
r.pop 109 13 11.92% ['fuzz_simple_sigstore', 'fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_with_cert_chain', 'fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key']
os.getenv 290 131 45.17% ['fuzz_simple_sigstore', 'fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_with_cert_chain', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key']
val.lower 91 38 41.75% ['fuzz_simple_sigstore', 'fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_with_cert_chain', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key']
OpenSSL.crypto.X509StoreContext.get_verified_chain 880 267 30.34% ['fuzz_simple_sigstore', 'fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_with_cert_chain', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key']
signer._signing_cert 89 31 34.83% ['fuzz_simple_sigstore', 'fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_with_cert_chain', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key']
verifier.verify_artifact 235 51 21.70% ['fuzz_simple_sigstore', 'fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_with_cert_chain', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key']
pydantic.model_validator 56 28 50.0% ['fuzz_simple_sigstore', 'fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_with_cert_chain', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key']
response.raise_for_status 658 142 21.58% ['fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_with_cert_chain']
collections.defaultdict 234 76 32.47% ['fuzz_simple_sigstore', 'fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_with_cert_chain', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key']
jwt.decode 165 37 22.42% ['fuzz_simple_sigstore', 'fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_with_cert_chain', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key']
url.rstrip 204 60 29.41% ['fuzz_simple_sigstore', 'fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_with_cert_chain', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key']
fields.extend 54 4 7.407% ['fuzz_simple_sigstore', 'fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_with_cert_chain', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key']
sct.log_id.hex 88 21 23.86% ['fuzz_simple_sigstore', 'fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_with_cert_chain', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key']
timestamp.timestamp 46 25 54.34% ['fuzz_simple_sigstore', 'fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_with_cert_chain', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key']
sign.add_argument_group 93 39 41.93% ['fuzz_simple_sigstore', 'fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_with_cert_chain', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key']
verify.add_subparsers 190 41 21.57% ['fuzz_simple_sigstore', 'fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_with_cert_chain', 'fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key']

Files and Directories in report

This section shows which files and directories are considered in this report. The main reason for showing this is fuzz introspector may include more code in the reasoning than is desired. This section helps identify if too many files/directories are included, e.g. third party code, which may be irrelevant for the threat model. In the event too much is included, fuzz introspector supports a configuration file that can exclude data from the report. See the following link for more information on how to create a config file: link

Files in report

Source file Reached by Covered by
[] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.hashes [] []
model_signing._signing.sign_sigstore_pb ['fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_with_cert_chain', 'fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_simple_sigstore', 'fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key'] []
...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key ['fuzz_sign_with_invalid_key'] []
cryptography.__about__ [] []
cryptography.hazmat._oid [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric.types [] []
sigstore._internal.rekor.client [] []
[] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.kdf.concatkdf [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives._cipheralgorithm [] []
cryptography.hazmat.asn1 [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.keywrap [] []
cryptography.hazmat.bindings.openssl.binding [] []
model_signing._signing.sign_ec_key ['fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key'] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric.dh [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.ciphers.base [] []
sigstore.dsse ['fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_with_cert_chain', 'fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_simple_sigstore', 'fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key'] []
urllib [] []
model_signing._cli [] []
json [] []
sigstore.verify.verifier ['fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_with_cert_chain', 'fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_simple_sigstore', 'fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key'] []
tempfile [] []
sigstore._internal.timestamp [] []
re [] []
sigstore._internal.rekor.client_v2 [] []
cryptography.x509 [] []
sigstore.models ['fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_with_cert_chain', 'fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_simple_sigstore', 'fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key'] []
tuf [] []
atheris [] []
enum [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.serialization.pkcs7 [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.ciphers.modes [] []
model_signing._serialization.serialization ['fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_simple_sigstore', 'fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key'] []
cryptography.hazmat.backends.openssl [] []
atexit [] []
model_signing._signing [] []
rfc3161_client [] []
binascii [] []
model_signing.signing ['fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key'] []
itertools [] []
model_signing._hashing.hashing [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.kdf.x963kdf [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.padding [] []
sigstore.__main__ [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric.x448 [] []
sigstore.hashes [] []
OpenSSL [] []
cryptography.hazmat.asn1.asn1 [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.kdf [] []
os [] []
sigstore._internal.key_details [] []
logging [] []
glob [] []
blake3 [] []
model_signing._signing.sign_sigstore ['fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_with_cert_chain', 'fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_simple_sigstore', 'fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key'] []
math [] []
model_signing._serialization.file_shard ['fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_simple_sigstore', 'fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key'] []
model_signing._signing.pkcs11uri [] []
cryptography.hazmat.bindings [] []
rekor_types [] []
sigstore.oidc ['fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key'] []
sigstore.sign ['fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key'] []
...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key ['fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key'] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric.ed448 [] []
opentelemetry [] []
sigstore._internal.trust [] []
uuid [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric.ec ['fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_with_cert_chain', 'fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_simple_sigstore', 'fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key'] []
sigstore._internal.merkle [] []
cryptography.hazmat.bindings.openssl._conditional [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.ciphers.algorithms [] []
sigstore_models [] []
id [] []
certifi [] []
cryptography.hazmat.decrepit [] []
cryptography.x509.base ['fuzz_with_cert_chain'] []
model_signing._hashing [] []
sigstore._internal.oidc [] []
model_signing.hashing ['fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_simple_sigstore', 'fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key'] []
cryptography.x509.ocsp [] []
functools [] []
cryptography.hazmat.bindings.openssl [] []
model_signing._serialization [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.constant_time [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric.utils [] []
cryptography.x509.general_name [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.ciphers [] []
collections [] []
typing [] []
requests [] []
rfc8785 [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.twofactor.totp [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives._asymmetric [] []
...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key ['fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key'] []
base64 [] []
datetime [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric.dsa [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.kdf.kbkdf [] []
...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_with_cert_chain ['fuzz_with_cert_chain'] []
sigstore._internal [] []
model_signing [] []
cryptography.x509.extensions ['fuzz_with_cert_chain'] []
cryptography.hazmat.decrepit.ciphers.algorithms [] []
cryptography.x509.verification [] []
cryptography.hazmat.bindings._rust [] []
utils [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.kdf.hkdf [] []
sigstore._internal.fulcio [] []
google [] []
cryptography.utils [] []
...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_simple_sigstore ['fuzz_simple_sigstore'] []
sigstore._utils ['fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_with_cert_chain', 'fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_simple_sigstore', 'fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key'] []
...model-transparency.tests.fuzzing.fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key ['fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key'] []
model_signing._hashing.io ['fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_simple_sigstore', 'fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key'] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives [] []
jwt [] []
cryptography.x509.oid [] []
model_signing.verifying ['fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_with_cert_chain', 'fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_simple_sigstore', 'fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key'] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.poly1305 [] []
typing_extensions [] []
hashlib [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.ciphers.aead [] []
asn1crypto [] []
platformdirs [] []
warnings [] []
sigstore._store [] []
importlib [] []
click [] []
cryptography.x509.name [] []
sigstore._internal.fulcio.client [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.cmac [] []
sigstore._internal.rekor [] []
hmac [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric.x25519 [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives._serialization [] []
cryptography.hazmat.decrepit.ciphers [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.twofactor [] []
model_signing._signing.sign_pkcs11 ['fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key'] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric.padding [] []
textwrap [] []
types [] []
bcrypt [] []
cryptography.hazmat.backends.openssl.backend [] []
model_signing._hashing.memory ['fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_with_cert_chain', 'fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_simple_sigstore', 'fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key'] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.twofactor.hotp [] []
sigstore._internal.sct ['fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_with_cert_chain', 'fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_simple_sigstore', 'fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key'] []
webbrowser [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.hmac [] []
rich [] []
email [] []
PyKCS11 [] []
shutil [] []
cryptography.hazmat.backends [] []
sigstore.verify.policy ['fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_with_cert_chain', 'fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_simple_sigstore', 'fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key'] []
io [] []
time [] []
pathlib [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric.rsa ['fuzz_with_cert_chain'] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.serialization.base [] []
sigstore.verify [] []
pyasn1 [] []
sigstore._internal.tuf ['fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_simple_sigstore'] []
pydantic [] []
sigstore._cli [] []
cryptography.x509.certificate_transparency [] []
sys [] []
sigstore.dsse._predicate [] []
model_signing._signing.signing ['fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_with_cert_chain', 'fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_simple_sigstore', 'fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key'] []
random [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.kdf.argon2 [] []
sigstore._internal.oidc.oauth ['fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key'] []
cryptography.exceptions [] []
sigstore [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.kdf.pbkdf2 [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.serialization.pkcs12 [] []
model_signing._serialization.file ['fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_simple_sigstore', 'fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key'] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric.ed25519 [] []
model_signing.__main__ [] []
sigstore.errors [] []
struct [] []
importlib_resources [] []
threading [] []
model_signing._signing.sign_certificate ['fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_with_cert_chain'] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.kdf.scrypt [] []
cryptography.fernet [] []
stat [] []
argparse [] []
sigstore._internal.rekor.checkpoint [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.serialization [] []
dataclasses [] []
cryptography.hazmat [] []
cryptography.hazmat.primitives.serialization.ssh [] []
cryptography [] []
model_signing.manifest ['fuzz_sign_with_valid_key_verify_with_invalid_key', 'fuzz_with_cert_chain', 'fuzz_sign_then_mutate_verify_with_valid_key', 'fuzz_simple_sigstore', 'fuzz_sign_verify_with_valid_key'] []

Directories in report

Directory