Fuzz introspector
For issues and ideas: https://github.com/ossf/fuzz-introspector/issues

Project functions overview

The following table shows data about each function in the project. The functions included in this table correspond to all functions that exist in the executables of the fuzzers. As such, there may be functions that are from third-party libraries.

For further technical details on the meaning of columns in the below table, please see the Glossary .

Func name Functions filename Args Function call depth Reached by Fuzzers Runtime reached by Fuzzers Combined reached by Fuzzers Fuzzers runtime hit Func lines hit % I Count BB Count Cyclomatic complexity Functions reached Reached by functions Accumulated cyclomatic complexity Undiscovered complexity

Fuzzer details

Fuzzer: fuzz_dumps

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is
Color Runtime hitcount Callsite count Percentage
red 0 80 40.6%
gold [1:9] 0 0.0%
yellow [10:29] 0 0.0%
greenyellow [30:49] 0 0.0%
lawngreen 50+ 117 59.3%
All colors 197 100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked Calltree index Parent function Callsite Largest blocked function
17 108 tomlkit._compat.decode call site: 00108 contextlib.suppress
11 164 tomlkit.items.Time.__init__ call site: 00164 datetime.datetime.isoformat
10 31 tomlkit.items.item call site: 00031 datetime.date.items
8 152 tomlkit.items.item call site: 00152 tomlkit.items.Date.__init__
7 93 tomlkit.items.item call site: 00093 numbers.Real.items
7 144 tomlkit.items.DateTime.__init__ call site: 00144 datetime.datetime.isoformat
6 62 tomlkit.items.AoT.__init__ call site: 00062 tomlkit.items.item
4 192 tomlkit.items.Array.as_string call site: 00192 v.value.as_string
3 43 tomlkit.items.item call site: 00043 .isinstance
1 1 ...fuzz_dumps.test_one_input call site: 00001 fdp.ConsumeInt
1 24 tomlkit.items.item call site: 00024 .isinstance
1 50 tomlkit.items.Table.append call site: 00050 tomlkit.items.item

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions
268
Functions that are reachable but not covered
65
Reachable functions
97
Percentage of reachable functions covered
32.99%
NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.
Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.
Function name source code lines source lines hit percentage hit

Files reached

filename functions hit
/ 1
...fuzz_dumps 4
tomlkit.api 17
tomlkit.items 63
tomlkit._compat 10
tomlkit._utils 7

Fuzzer: fuzz_parser

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is
Color Runtime hitcount Callsite count Percentage
red 0 162 22.1%
gold [1:9] 0 0.0%
yellow [10:29] 0 0.0%
greenyellow [30:49] 0 0.0%
lawngreen 50+ 569 77.8%
All colors 731 100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked Calltree index Parent function Callsite Largest blocked function
17 5 tomlkit._compat.decode call site: 00005 contextlib.suppress
12 449 tomlkit.container.Container._replace_at call site: 00449 tomlkit.items.Table.append
11 341 tomlkit.items.Time.__init__ call site: 00341 collections.abc.MutableSequence.isoformat
11 418 tomlkit.container.Container._replace_at call site: 00418 tomlkit.container.Container._insert_at
10 256 tomlkit.items.item call site: 00256 datetime.time.items
9 590 tomlkit._utils.parse_rfc3339 call site: 00590 m.group
8 329 tomlkit.items.item call site: 00329 tomlkit.items.Date.__init__
7 299 tomlkit.items.item call site: 00299 collections.abc.MutableSequence.items
7 321 tomlkit.items.DateTime.__init__ call site: 00321 collections.abc.MutableSequence.isoformat
6 287 tomlkit.items.AoT.__init__ call site: 00287 tomlkit.items.item
6 678 tomlkit.parser.Parser._parse_table call site: 00678 tomlkit.items.Table.__init__
5 372 tomlkit.container.Container.append call site: 00372 .isinstance

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions
267
Functions that are reachable but not covered
114
Reachable functions
213
Percentage of reachable functions covered
46.48%
NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.
Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.
Function name source code lines source lines hit percentage hit

Files reached

filename functions hit
/ 1
...fuzz_parser 4
tomlkit.parser 100
tomlkit._compat 10
tomlkit.source 10
tomlkit.toml_char 2
tomlkit.items 67
tomlkit._utils 18
tomlkit.container 58